Standards
Standards
Standards
(USA)
(Norway)
Texas Railroad
Commission –
Onshore
API Monogram Program
•Licenses are specific to product specs.
•Specific products are listed on
license.
•Requires certification of quality system
to API Q1 / ISO 29001.
•License applies only to one location.
•Audits by API every 3 years.
•Monogram applied by licensed facility
certifies compliance with product spec
& quality system requirements.
API Monogram Program
•Top three API specifications:
•5CT: Casing & tubing – 455 licenses
•6A: Wellhead & trees – 432 licenses
•6D: Pipeline valves - 415 licenses
•Top three countries:
•USA: 531 facilities, 980 licenses
•China: 484 facilities, 843 licenses
•India: 138 facilities, 277 licenses
•Licenses listed online & updated daily:
•Includes suspensions & cancellations
•Versatile search engine available
•Link from Cameron Quality website
Cameron International API Licenses
-more than any other company
API 6A Wellhead & Xmas Tree Equip. 27
API 6D Pipeline Valves 15
API 16A Drill-Through Equipment 14
API 16C Choke & Kill Systems 4
API 16D Drilling Controls Systems 2
API 16R Drilling Riser Couplings 1
API 17D Subsea Wellhead & Xmas Trees 12
API 17F Subsea Production Controls 1
API 11AX Downhole pump components 1
API 11B Sucker rods and couplings 1
ISO
ANSI
API
AWHEM
Why do we need standards?
Standards Development:
Evolution of Goals
•1930-1960: Interchangeability
-Flange dimensions & standard connections
-Sizes and pressure ratings
•1960-1980: Safety
-Basic pressure vessel integrity (ASME BPVC)
-Fire resistance, contingency in design
•1980-2000: Standardization
-PSL, Material & Temperature Classes
-Replace individual company standards
•2000-present: Reliability
Significant events drive
standards priorities
1970:
Bay Marchand Fire, GOM
•Multi-well platform
•Well control lost on one well with others in
production.
•Fire consumed platform, burned for months.
•Total asset loss of platform ($100 MM).
•Led to development of standards for fire-
resistant equipment.
•Contributed to development of US
regulations for offshore operations
Bay Marchand Xmas Tree
(Cameron)
1973:
West Texas: Fatal H2S Leak
•Bullplug failure on Xmas tree.
•Failure cause: sulfide stress cracking
(SSC).
•Nine deaths from release of H2S.
•Texas RRC requested NACE to develop
standard for materials resistant to SSC.
•NACE MR0175 published in 1975, revised
annually, used globally.
•ISO 15156 (Parts 1-3) / NACE MR0175
published in 2004, continually updated.
1988: Piper Alpha
North Sea, UK Sector
•Specifications
-Product requirements
-Manufacturing & design
•Recommended Practices (RP)
-Operational procedures
-System design
•Technical Report/Bulletin
-Informational or advisory
-Research reports
API Publications
• 1964: 36 standards, 23 RP’s
-Typical price 50 cents
• 2004: 350 stds. & RP’s, 400 others
-Typical price $100.00
• Current chair of Executive
Committee for Standardization:
-Charlie Williams, Shell Oil Co.
(Gary Devlin, Cameron, represents
Petroleum Equipment Suppliers Assoc.)
Standards Development Process
ISO (Geneva, Switzerland)
• Subcommittees & Work Groups
-Organized by product, activity area
-Develops & approves work plans
• Work Groups & Task Groups
-Technical “experts” write, revise standards
-Users, manufacturers, interested parties
• Voting and Comment by Country
-Through national standards bodies (e.g., ANSI, BSI)
-25 “P-member” countries for TC-67 voting
ISO: International Standards
TC-67: Petrochemical & Gas
• 1996: First standards published.
-Adoptions of API standards
• 2006: 100 standards
-20 under ISO direct control
• Current chair: Cheryl Stark, BP
(Ries Langereis, Cameron chairs ISO work
group for 10423)
Joint Standards Development
ISO + API
• API & ISO Work Groups collaborate
-May assign or share responsibility
• ISO stages: CD, DIS, FDIS
-Comments from both API & ISO members
Voting on International Standards
-API votes & recommends US vote (to ANSI)
-Separate API ballot to adopt as API Standard
-API may add “regional annexes”
Joint Standards Development
Example: API 6A/ISO 10423
API 6A ISO
10423 API
Cover Annex N: API
Sheets Wellhead & Annex O:
Xmas Tree Use of
Equipment The API Technical
Monogram Changes
for API 6A
Differences between US & ISO
Standards Processes
•US Restraint of Trade Legislation.
-Landmark $10MM judgment against ASME
•US Product Liability lawsuits.
-Works both for & against standards
•US Requirements for Open Process.
-Cannot restrict non-industry access
•ISO allows patented designs in standards.
•ISO has less structure for maintaining standards.
•ISO process is slower: typically 5 year cycle,
multiple ballot stages.
Oil & Gas Industry Standards
Where are we going?
•API & ISO develop international standards.
- Include more countries as participants
•Shift in focus from products to people.
- Capture experience & knowledge base
- Cover training & competency requirements
•Manage cost of technology development.
-JIP’s, API & other independent research
•Continue to learn, improve, change cultures.
-No pollution, injury, loss of life is acceptable!
Industry Standards for
Drilling & Production Systems
Questions?