Assignment 1 PP
Assignment 1 PP
Assignment 1 PP
Class: BS IT
Semester: 8th
GC University Faisalabad
Page 1 of 8
1.Three-step strategy for approaching cyber-ethics issues are:
Understanding:
Begin by thoroughly understanding the ethical issue at hand. This includes
understanding the technology involved, its implications, and the stakeholders
affected. It's important to consider how actions in the cyber realm can impact
individuals, organizations, and society as a whole.
Analysis:
Once the issue is understood, it's important to analyze it from an ethical
standpoint. This involves considering different ethical frameworks, such as
utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, etc., to evaluate the potential
consequences and moral implications of various courses of action. Analyze how
the actions align or conflict with ethical principles and societal norms.
Decision-Making:
After understanding and analyzing the issue, make an informed decision about
how to address it. This decision should be guided by ethical principles, legal
considerations, and the potential impact on stakeholders. It's important to
choose a course of action that minimizes harm, respects individual rights, and
upholds ethical standards.
Similarities:
Focus on Consequences:
Both Act and Rule Utilitarianism prioritize the consequences of actions as the
basis for determining their morality. The goal is to maximize overall happiness
or utility.
Utilitarian Principle:
Both theories are grounded in the principle of utility, which holds that actions
are morally right if they produce the greatest good for the greatest number of
people.
Promotion of Happiness:
Both Act and Rule Utilitarianism seek to promote happiness and minimize
suffering as the ultimate goals of morality.
Differences:
Evaluation of Actions:
Act Utilitarianism evaluates individual actions based on their specific
consequences, while Rule Utilitarianism evaluates actions based on the
consequences of following general rules or principles.
Role of Rules:
Act Utilitarianism does not rely on fixed rules or principles, while Rule
Utilitarianism emphasizes the importance of following rules that have been
determined to maximize overall happiness.
Complexity:
Rule Utilitarianism introduces a layer of complexity by considering the
consequences of adopting and following certain rules, whereas Act
Utilitarianism focuses solely on the immediate consequences of individual
actions.