Final Research PDF
Final Research PDF
Final Research PDF
BY;
NO NAME ID NO.
June, 2022
Ambo, Oromia, Ethiopia
RIFT VALLY UNVERSITY AMBO CAMPUS
By:
NO Name ID NO.
1 .Girma kituma………………………………..020/18
2 .Beley Beyena…………………………………..048/18
3 .Hirpa Dida ……………………………………101/18
4 .Fikedu Tashome……………………….............083/18
5 .Gudeta Adugna………………………………..104/18
This thesis is our original work and has not previously been submitted for a degree at any
other university, and that all reference materials contained therein have been duly
acknowledged.
Approval sheet
Examiners:
1.____________________________ _______ ________
2. ____________________________ _______ ________
3. ____________________________ ________ ________
Advisor
Mr. Bekele Taso ________ ________
We are very much indebted to thank respectfully my all advisor and coordinator of Research
for those precious ideas, support and tolerance throughout the course of our studies program,
and this thesis work. As well for his guidance and enthusiasm, that made this Research work
possible.
i
Abstract
Based on interview data from registered land surveyors, academics in land surveying,
government surveyors and relevant secondary data, this topic presents a case for
improvements the cadastral surveying practice of Ambo town. It argues that current cadastral
practice in Ambo outdated and requires improvements that will position it in line with current
international practice and technological advancements. The paper Investigation the
challenge in preparation of cadastral map and its remedial measure in case of ambo town
General in cadastral survey practice with respect to providing reference information, testing
of survey equipment, lodging and examination of survey records, cadastral survey standards
and regulations. In addition the paper also examines the challenges faced by surveyors in the
existing cadastral management with regard to legislation, archiving of cadastral information,
quality control, and delivery period of cadastral survey services, professionalism and
continuous professional development. The paper offers a modest empirical basis for
investigate cadastral survey practice and how it can be improved.
The cadastral surveying techniques in Ethiopia are using traditional measuring devices (e.g.
chain, rods, tape, or strings).Hence, the plots are described according to their positional
relationship to those features and as to their position relative to neighboring plots (e.g., whose
property is on the north, east, west and south the sides of the plot being registered).For this
reason in the three certification period in Ethiopia none of the regions prepared a (cadastral)
map, not even a sketch and/or they simply measurement based cadastral surveying
techniques.Thus,the integration of GPS and High resolution satellite images with GIS in
producing cadastral map could accelerate the cadastral map coverage in Ethiopia .This is
also tested its‟ procedure in the study area Ambo town urban land Administration office.
ii
Table of contents
Contents page
Acknowledgments .............................................................................................. i
Abstract ............................................................................................................. ii
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
1.1. Background of Study ............................................................................................................... 1
1.2. Statements of Problems.......................................................................................................... 4
1.2.1. Densify Ground Control Points ....................................................................................... 4
1.2.2. Professional Ethics of Surveyor ....................................................................................... 5
1.2.3. Mistake when operating surveying instrument ............................................................... 6
1.2.4. Due to mismatch of orthophotos and data collected ....................................................... 6
1.3. Objectives................................................................................................................................ 6
1.3.1. General objective ............................................................................................................ 6
1.3.2. Specific objectives .......................................................................................................... 6
1.4. Description of study area ........................................................................................................ 7
iii
3.2. Data Source ........................................................................................................................... 21
3.3. Research Design and method ............................................................................................... 22
3.3.1. Basic awareness ............................................................................................................ 22
3.3.2. Reconnaissance for a GPS Survey ................................................................................ 22
3.3.3. Preparation of Base Diagrams or index map................................................................. 23
3.3.4. Collection of Field Information .................................................................................... 23
3.3.5. Investigation of documents related to Land and Demarcation of Boundaries .............. 23
3.3.6. Establishing ground Control point ................................................................................ 24
3.4. Ground surveying method..................................................................................................... 26
3.4.1. Using Real time kinematic (RTK) GPS ........................................................................ 26
3.4.2. Using Total Station ....................................................................................................... 26
3.5. Office Work - Processing of Collected Data .......................................................................... 32
3.6. Public Review ....................................................................................................................... 33
3.7. Material use in cadastral map preparation ............................................................................ 34
3.8. Soft ware‟s: ARCGIS ........................................................................................................... 35
3.8.1. Equipment use ............................................................................................................... 35
6 References .............................................................................................. 42
iv
List of figures
Figure 1 Order of control point ............................................................................................................. 25
Figure 2 data collection using total station. ......................................................................................... 27
Figure 3 Tripod setup. ......................................................................................................................... 28
Figure 4 Mount Instrument on Tripod .................................................................................................. 29
Figure 5 Focused on surveying point .................................................................................................... 30
Figure 6 levelling the instrument .......................................................................................................... 31
Figure 7 The overall prouder of preparation of cadastral map in case of AMBO town ....................... 34
Figure 8 Orthophoto of Ambo town samepart ...................................................................................... 37
Figure 9 GD of one neighborhood of AMBO town .............................................................................. 38
Figure 10 Parcel of one person ownership ............................................................................................ 39
v
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Cadastral systems have a long tradition. Egypt has had such an institution since about 3000
BC.The Romans, particularly under Emperor Diocletian us in the 3rd century AD, introduced
land inventories in occupied territories. Also in China a taxation system was developed for
land. Spain introduced its first cadaster for taxation purposes in 1714. The colonialists in the
late 19th and early 20th century introduced systematic inventories on land in the colonies to
enforce their power. The purpose of the cadasters has changed over time. Initially, taxation
was the main purpose, later on juridical cadastral systems for land use control were
established; and after private land ownership became more common, the systems were
providing security and reliability and became a basis for land markets (De Soto, 2000).
The Cadaster is a parcel-based system, i.e. information is geographically referenced to
unique, well-defined units of land. These units are defined by the formal or informal
boundaries marking the extent of lands held for exclusive use by individuals and specific
groups of individuals (e.g. families, corporations, and communal groups). Each parcel is
given a unique code or parcel identifier. Examples of these codes include addresses, co-
ordinates, or lot numbers shown on survey plan or map. (Williamson et al, 2001).
Hence, Cadastral systems should be seen as a core component of more comprehensive land
administration systems or infrastructures concerned with the processes of determining,
recording and disseminating information about tenure value and use of land using the
surveying technologies when implementing land polices. Appropriate land administration
systems then provide the basis for sound land management towards economic, social and
environmental sustainability.
A cadastral survey system is an interactive multitude of land administration sub-systems
including adjudication, boundary definition and demarcation, surveying, registration, dispute
resolution and information management (Larsson, 1991; Cheng & Tang, 2002). There has
been a rapid rate of advancement in technology for surveying data collection tools: for
example Total Stations, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), Digital
Photogrammetric work stations as well as survey processing software such as Model Maker,
1
AutoCAD, Arc cadaster, SURPAC to name just a few, although these technological
advancements have been well embraced by cadastral surveyor technologies.
Cadastral Surveyors in Ambo, there have been faced with many challenge when the collect
or surveying the boundary, road, neighborhood, and coordinate of the parcel to produce
cadastral map. Surveying is the technology that used to determine and defines land ownership
and boundaries as Property.
Their ultimate purpose are being to give unambiguous, graphical, numerical or Descriptive
information relating to location, extent, shape and size of land.
The level of detail for cadastral survey information is often a contentious issue amongst
stakeholders of the real property registration process. It is generally the case that surveyors
and survey authorities will support or promote the collection of extraneous amounts of data,
whereas lawyers look to collect less data. The challenge lies in balancing the views and
wishes of all stakeholders and ensuring that cadastral surveys collect an adequate amount of
spatial and other related data,so that an individual rear property object can be unambiguously
described and identified.
The property registration system that the cadastral data is supporting also plays a role in the
level of detail of information collected. Under a deeds registration system, including parcel
based variations, the real property object acts as an object that transaction documents (deeds)
are indexed against. In many cases an accurate spatial description (size and location) does not
exist.
It is the responsibility of those conducting transactions on real property objects to investigate
the contents of the deeds to identify what interests, conflicting or enduring, potentially may
exist for the property unit. There is no requirement for the spatial identification of the various
interests that may exist, for example, easements for utility companies. It is only the property
unit itself that requires identification.
Under a title registration system the real property object is registered, as are all rights,
responsibilities and interests connected with that real property object. In transferring from a
deeds registration system to a title registration system all rights, responsibilities and interests
that exist must be investigated, identified and adjudicated before the real property object can
be registered in the title register.
There are likely to be spatial components to many of these rights and interests, which should
also be identified. Examples include public and private rights of way, easements for
underground utilities, etc. Therefore, cadastral data collection for the purposes of supporting
2
title registration systems will in many cases be more time consuming, complex and expensive
than for a deeds registration system.
Although the cadastral surveying has been long in existence within Ambo town it is
recommended; that the following basic concepts should be used as core guiding principles
underpinning the cadastral surveying and mapping system in Ambo:
1. Cadastral surveying data (maps, plans, coordinates) constitute evidence to support the
definition, validation or re-establishment of a real estate object boundary.
2. All available evidence will be evaluated in support of the validation or re–establishment of
a real estate object boundary. Evidence may include physical indications, verbal testimony,
surveying and mapping records and data, etc.
3. In general, all available legitimate boundary evidence will be considered (weighed)
when validating or re-establishing a boundary. The principle of the preponderance of
evidence will prevail.
However, it should be emphasized that accurate (reliable) cadastral surveying information
constitutes very strong evidence, and therefore contributes significantly to the security of
title. Once these cadastral data requirements have been agreed on it is recommended that a
new set of technical fieldwork instructions for the conduct of cadastral surveys be developed
by EMA for use by its technical staff and private survey contractors.
3
1.2. Statements of Problems
GCPs are points on the surface of the earth where both image coordinates and map
coordinates can be identified. The proper distribution of GCPs could be studied through the
consideration of the possibilities that might exist in the aerial images and the geometric
transformations used. An evaluation of control point‟s distribution is carried out to explore
the effect of distribution patterns based on different distortions and commonly used geometric
transformation to obtain high accuracy of geometric correction of remote sensing aerial
4
image, the location and distribution of selected GCPs should be taken into consideration as
mentioned before.
Densification results showed that the number of GCPs used to adjust of the our data collected
by surveying and orthophotos produce approximately the same results
5
work while the other surveyor is still employed, unless the other surveyor is made aware of
the review.
1.2.3. Mistake when operating surveying instrument
Surveying errors may be negligible or at times be significant .Besides the goal of survey is to
Produce accurate and precise observations. Often measurements with greater accuracy and
precision .Requirements employ multiple observations to minimize procedural errors.
In order to avoid surveyor should be calibrate the instrument before the start the survey.
Since the surveying Equipment industry has many different types of tools, each with own
benefit. But the surveyor ambo towns are used total station to producing legal cadaster of
ambo town. The surveyor should put into much consideration to avoid errors.
The surveyor should be checking the accuracy of the control point. If the control points of
surveyor using is faulty the work itself will have errors. So GCP should be verified by the
Government survey office. The machine being used should be calibrated and checked for
errors before work. Calibration mostly happens for total Station and leveling machine. The
errors my occurred during observation due to variation of temperature, humidity, refraction,
pressure, current velocity and etc .this error may be systematic error or personal error.
1.2.4. Due to mismatch of orthophotos and data collected
This happened due to shifting of the data collected by surveyor and orthophotos of ambo
town.
This problem may come from structural plan of the town and the land use of ambo town are
not match with data collected in each parcel of properties Us we see on ground and
orthophotos. Orthophotos becomes more valuable when distortions have been removed to
match the geodetic control, base map, and cadastral layer.
1.3. Objectives
1.3.1. General objective
The research that describes about Investigation the Challenges in preparation cadastral
map and its remedial measure in case of Ambo town To realize the required accuracy
level in .cadastral surveying and mapping it also Facilitate and simplify the cadastral
surveying and mapping works as a user guide in both field and office work.
1.3.2. Specific objectives
The objective of this Research is to assess the general situation of investigation the challenge
in preparation of cadastral map and its remedial measure cadastral system of the Ambo town
6
based on the experiences of some selected case studies that are already stated and provided
by various organizational reports.
Process of modernization and actualization of the ambo cadastral system and its adjusting
with the land management register so they could reflect the real situation in the field was
done and still is working in the following ways:
1. Cadastral survey – ensures harmonized cadastral and land management data which
represents real situation in the field.
2. Technical perambulation– limited collection and processing of data with the same
purpose as the cadastral survey.
3. Individual transformation of cadastral parcel.
Cadastral survey is the process of collecting and processing all necessary data in order to
form cadastral parcels, record buildings and other structures, note special legal rights in the
field and the land use, in the purpose of making new cadaster of real estate.
Technical revision is done while comparing the cadastral map with ownership registers and
digital orthophotos is established that for a maximum of cadastral parcels needed.
7
casualties of the Pusteria Division. The approach to Ambo was still over an old bridge, and
below it a natural bridge used by caravans.
When the Allies reached Ambo with a South African armored car patrol in early 1941, they
had to evacuate 140 "utterly panicked Italians". The British operated an improvised camp for
prisoners-of-war at Ambo until 1942.
At least as early as 1955, there was a 170 kW hydro-electric power station in the town; by
1965 the installed electrical capacity was 210 kVA, with annual production of 132,000 kWh.
In 1958 Ambo was one of 27 places in Ethiopia ranked as First Class Township.
8
CHAPTER TWO
9
the pure technological issues to include also managerial components of building and
maintaining national spatial data infrastructures.
The information technology revolution with the technological development such as digital
cadastral databases and the WWW are vital tools for land administration and planning both
now and into the future. In Ting and Williamson (1999), it is mentioned that the advances on
technology had influenced the management of land through the large spatial database
management, GPS technologies and high-resolution satellite imagery, GIS technologies, and
communication technologies such as the WWW.
The global drivers described above influence the form of land administration infrastructures
which support and facilitate the way societies interact with land. These drivers influence the
development of the different land administration policies and models adopted by state and
national governments, which in turn influence and provide the systems on which local
government and city administrations rely. These models and concepts can only be developed
with a clear understanding of current land administration issues and trends. By its very nature
land administration focuses on land tenure and cadastral (land parcel related) issues. The land
administration perspective includes understanding the changing humankind to land
relationship, cadastral issues such as national cadastral systems in countries which are a
federation of states, and land tenure issues such as native title.
At the same time local government or city administrations must fully recognise these land
administration trends and the impact they have on their own spatial information strategies.
Besides, Land administration systems all over the world are reviewing their functional
structures and undergoing major legislative and administrative changes. They are doing this
in response to different internal and external drivers. In the developed countries, the major
drivers for reform are advances in geo-information technology (GIT) and the associated
demands from customers for improved service delivery. Reforms include electronic land
administration e.g. electronic lodgment and processing of cadastral and registration
documents, digital management of records and electronic distribution of products and
services through the internet. In the developing countries, the main drivers for reform are the
need for regularization of non-formal land rights. Reforms here mainly include innovative
legislative and administrative adjustments to accommodate and accelerate the
registration of individual and group rights in customary land and informal settlements.
African countries in general have large areas of land, which are sparsely populated. The
economic output from these lands is generally very low. Only specific types of land use can
10
generate income that can motivate the investment in a cadastral system. One aim of a cadaster
is to provide security of tenure.
The customary tenure system in African countries, which usually comprises most land,
provides adequate security of tenure for the members of the community. Transfer of land
between members of the community can usually also be handled with enough security within
the traditional systems.
There is therefore no need and consequently no demand from land users of systematic
establishment of cadastral systems in these large areas. The traditional system is however
unable to provide appropriate security of tenure in areas where it no longer exists, or are
being misused or for other reasons are falling apart.
One such misuse occurs when traditional leaders start to look upon themselves as owners
(instead of custodians on behalf of the community) of the land and see opportunities to own
money on land transactions and speculations. Other disturbances of the customary tenure
occur with migration of people, mixing of people of different origin, diseases and calamities,
investment by foreigners, and the urbanization. In all these situations, which are more and
more frequent, there is a demand for some kind of more elaborated cadastral system in order
to provide the security of tenure that the customary tenure fail to provide.
11
But the system must be appropriate, which means that they must be designed in such a way
that they are affordable and accessible for the users. African countries need economic
development and thus need investments. One of the most important sectors for investments in
African countries is agriculture and other types of efficient land use.
Capital needs to be brought in from abroad.
Generally, the process of land administration needs complete, accurate and reliable
information about the ownership, use and value of existing land and its resources. Cadastres
play the „book-keeping‟‟ role for this information within the wider land administration and
land management systems. The cadaster is considered to be the core of a land administration
system (Steudler, 2004; Wiliamson, 2001a).
It is desirable for all jurisdictions in a state or province to use the same primary system of
parcel identification. Because agencies have different needs, various
secondary identifiers may also be used to index parcel data; however, all of the secondary
identifiers must be cross indexed to the legally recognized, unique parcel identifier, allowing
multiple uses of the data.
The American Bar Association also identified a now widely accepted set of six desirable
criteria that should be evaluated when considering property identification systems.
12
They are:cadastral systems comprise a land registration system and a cadastral survey and/or
mapping system as key components. The cadastral survey comprises processes such as the
control of geodetic data, parcel demarcation and surveying, cadastral mapping, cadastral
mutation and map updating. As Zevenbergen and Bogart‟s (2001) mentioned, Land
registration is the process by which the documentation affecting interests in land are recorded
in a public register. This is the official legal registration of properties and legal rights.
The International Federation of Surveyors (FIG, 1995) defines a cadaster as a “parcel based
and up-to-date land information system containing a record of interests in land (e.g. rights,
restrictions and responsibilities). It usually includes a geometric description of land parcels
linked to other records describing the nature of the interests, ownership or control of those
interests, and often the value of the parcel and its improvements. It may be established for
fiscal purposes (valuation and taxation), legal purposes (conveyancing), to assist in the
management of land and land-use control (planning and administration), and enables
sustainable development and environmental improvement”.
13
permanent geodetic points and maps, the most important of which is the cadastral map.
The measured data are on the sketches and in the protocols. Before digitization, technical and
alphanumerical datasets were maintained separately. Separate data maintenance caused
redundancy, which further led to inconsistencies between the cadastral map and the register.
Therefore, it makes sense to talk about Cadastral Systems or Cadastral Infrastructures rather
than just Cadaster. These systems or infrastructures include the interaction between the
identification of land parcels, the registration of land rights, the valuation and taxation of land
and property, and the control of present and possible future use of land (Enemark et al, 2005).
According to Tuladhar (1998) the term Cadastre includes different types of purposes such as
Juridical: a register of ownership of the proprietary land parcel; Fiscal: a register of properties
recording their value to support taxation; Land use: a register of land use; and when a
cadastre serves as a supplier of up-to-date and reliable land information at an affordable cost,
it is then termed as Multipurpose Cadastre. The objective of the multipurpose cadastre is to
provide a service through which the dynamics of the land parcel may be studied and also
meet the demands of the evolution of LAS which means the needs of the users.
14
Minerals below the surface are also integral part. However, in the legal courts of many
countries, private ownership of mineral deposits does not necessarily follow from the
ownership of the land. III. Legal Cadaster:
Survey which furnishes information for the Registration of the land. Determination of legal
ownership and Registration of legal transactions is called as legal cadaster. The requirements
of physical survey of land boundaries preceding registration may not be necessary since
registration can be based on old documents. Thus, in general, the legal cadaster is a
complement to both property cadaster and tax cadaster.
Hence, the most efficient approach is to take all three objectives together and integrate the
three types of cadasters in one system. This, in essence is Land Information System or LIS.
According to Dr Jim Riddell, FAO The success of the cadaster can be measured by:
1. Simplicity
2. Uniqueness
3. Accuracy
4. Flexibility
5. . Economy
6. Accessibility
Simplicity
A property unit identifier should be easy to understand, easy to use and reasonably
permanent. This will ensure that a new system can be readily adopted by its users, is easy to
use and maintain under normal operations, and can be expected to remain in place for a
reasonable period of time.
Uniqueness
An identifier should be assigned to only one real property object and one real property
object should be assigned only one identifier to ensure a one-to-one relationship between
identifiers and real property objects. This contributes to the system‟s simplicity by
avoiding misidentification of property unit related data and contributes to its longevity.
Accuracy
Accuracy is pertinent only for those systems that contain some spatial component within
the identifier. For example, a system using the coordinates of a property unit centroid in
15
the identifier for a real property object in Cairo could be accurate to the nearest 1m in
terms of absolute accuracy.
Flexibility
Any system introduced should be flexible enough to be compatible with various systems
already in place and have the ability to be adapted to future advances in technology GIS.
Economy
The costs of real property identifications should be assessed with regards to the initial
cost of establishing the system, and ongoing costs for maintaining and updating the system.
Accessibility
The parcel identification system should be readily accessible to the various users of
property related data, such as the REPD, RETD and Municipalities in the case of Egypt.
This is an important consideration for whichever agency is chosen for establishing,
maintaining and updating in Egypt. Given ESA‟s existing role in providing maps and
some ownership data to REPD and RETD, it is recommended that ESA be tasked with
this responsibility, and that of disseminating up-to-date data to other agencies.
It is recommended that the committee formed by MSAD first evaluate the appropriateness a
predominantly location based numeric identifier as the primary real property object identifier,
Mas opposed to a system based on administrative boundaries, map based numbering.
The mass scale property registration activities planned for Greater Cairo present a unique
opportunity to design an appropriate property locator system for implementation in urban
areas prior to implementation of field activity. This should be a priority issue that is
addressed by MSAD and other agencies as soon as possible.
Where additional individual real property objects, exist such as buildings or apartments, they
could be represented through a suffix to the location based parcel identifier.
It is recommended that a building suffix (2 digits) sit between land parcel and apartment unit
numbers to accommodate scenarios where more than one building may sit on the land parcel.
Apartment unit suffixes should not need more than 3 digits to accommodate larger apartment
developments as well as commercial buildings. Since the system proposed consists of
coordinates it is again recommended that the NED-95 be adopted as the norm for cadastral
surveying and mapping, at least within Greater Cairo to begin with. Such a numbering system
would meet simplicity criteria given its link with the coordinate based location of property
16
units. This location based approach also ensures uniqueness if adequate levels of accuracy are
achieved during the initial data capture phase.
Since the system proposed consists of coordinates it is again recommended that to be adopted
as the norm for cadastral surveying and mapping, at least within Greater Ambo town to begin
with. Such a numbering system would meet simplicity criteria given its link with the
coordinate based location of property units.
This location based approach also ensures uniqueness if adequate levels of accuracy are
achieved during the initial data capture phase, which is more likely than not. The mass scale
property registration activities planned for Ambo town present a unique opportunity to design
an appropriate property locator system for implementation in urban areas prior to
implementation of field activity.
The cadastral mapping areas are the areas in which cadastral maps have been completed and
when resurveying land parcels in these areas, following instructions should be followed.
It may be required to resurvey the following types of land parcels in cadastral mapping areas.
Many of these initiatives have previously been carried out by the International Federation of
Surveyors (FIG), the UN Economic Commission for Europe (UN-ECE), cadastral template
project etc. Registration of Urban Land Holding No.818/2014 and regulation of Council of
Ministers No.44/ 2007 provide for Urban Cadastral surveying establishment. Since Cadaster
is up-to-date LIS of which parcel must be surveyed based on the national cadastral surveying
standard.
Efficient systems to officially record rights in land comprise two basic sets of information:
Registers comprised largely of textual or alphanumeric data that record rights in land;
And maps or a spatial framework that define the boundaries and extent of land parcels
over which these rights apply.
These two basic sets of information constitute the concept of the cadaster.
1. Under the cadastral concept there is a close, explicit linkage between the textual and
spatial data. With this link in place, various search/access mechanisms can be
developed to search information on rights in land. These searches can be from keys in
17
the alphanumeric data or from queries in the spatial framework and reports can be
produced in either or both domains. The spatial framework can also be a useful tool in
validating the textual data, identifying, for example, parcels where numerical data is
not available. An essential prerequisite for an efficient cadastral system is therefore
ensuring that the two datasets are maintained and up-to-date. No set of rights should
exist without a spatial parcel to assign them to, and all spatial parcels should be linked
to a set of rights. This is a simple concept, but can be very difficult to implement in
practice. In many countries there is a weak or non-existent spatial framework and this
is a major cause of uncertainty in rights in land hence, it is important to consider the
social context of land boundaries in assessing the technical requirements for surveying
and mapping. Where there is a simple, community-accepted system of defining parcel
boundaries or where there is a low social cost in getting agreement on boundaries there
is reduced justification for accurate but costly surveys and comprehensive mapping
systems. This is the situation in many countries for instance; Thailand where the prime
emphasis in re-establishing boundaries is agreement by the parties rather than re-
instatement from information recorded in the land records. Most surveys in Thailand
are undertaken to lower accuracy, but lower cost, graphical standards. In other
countries, such as Tunisia, there is a higher social cost in reaching agreement on
boundaries. When agreement is reached on boundaries in Tunisia, accurate and costly
surveys are undertaken and the coordinates determined from these surveys are used to
re-instate boundaries. In England a general boundary system operates with strong
community acceptance. The general boundaries are charted on large-scale topographic
maps produced by a national authority. Registry maps and file plans are produced from
these maps. Land owners have the option of requesting accurate surveys to fix their
boundaries, but few such requests are made.
2. According to Ting and Williamson 2000, the cadastral map record is a prime layer in
supporting the development of national Spatial Data Infrastructure. In many countries
cadastral maps compiled to graphical standards that support the index aspect as stated
above provide the foundation for SDI. Many users in various countries express a need
for higher accuracy. These users include utility authorities that want to chart their
assets on the cadastral spatial framework and typical express the need for „spade
width‟ accuracy, something that approaches survey accuracy in the cadastral
framework. Few if any developed countries have been able to implement such a
18
system, even with significant recent improvements in technology and a range of
innovative approaches to phase the introduction of improved accuracy.
Generally, there are two broad aspects to the spatial framework that might support a
land registration system. The first is a topological or indexing the identification of
land parcels recorded in the register, including support for the sub-division or
consolidation of land parcels.
19
Mapping – This is the geometric description of cadastral land units. The basic
requirement of cadastral mapping is to provide a sufficient specification of the location of a
land unit (or object). An index (i.e. a spatial framework) that is based on the earth‟s
surface is necessary for this purpose. Aerial photographs provide suitable indices for
cadastral mapping in many countries because land units can be identified by reference
to terrestrial features using simple photo interpretation methods. Land object definitions
without any reference to the earth‟s surface can use other means to meet the demands of
providing evidence of the location of land objects. Any sort of geo-reference that is
recognized by a community will meet the demands of specifying a land object.
20
CHAPTER THREE
The study area is Ambo Town and located 114kms west of Addis Ababa. It has 6 urban
kebele and 4 rural peasant associations surrounding and located at the altitude of 2100 meters
above sea levels with temperate climate. Afte Lij Iyasu was captured, he was he was held for
Awhile at Ambo, before being transferred to house Arrest at Fiche in the early 1930s.
BY1933 Ambo had stated to be recreation Area with the construction of some bath cabins
With cisterns of Concert and a couple of European type hotel aswel as simple villas for the
Emperor and important person.
21
3.3. Research Design and method
3.3.1. Basic awareness
The Commissioner of Cadastral Team will arrange the divisional level awareness programs
and the Senior Superintendent of Surveys / Superintendent of Surveys / Surveyors should
participate in such awareness programs.
The Commissioner of cadastral team will collect the preliminary information of the land
parcels in the area selected for the registration of cadastral map.
The information thus collected will be categorized and entered in sub – schedules by the
Commissioner of Title Settlement and send by a survey requisition to District Senior
Superintendent of Surveys along with the relevant lists of names those live in Ambo town.
22
3.3.3. Preparation of Base Diagrams or index map
The Ambo town urban land Division is considered as a unit for the preparation of Cadastral
Maps and once the cadastral mapping area is declared, the District Senior Superintendent of
Surveys should make arrangement to assign cadastral map numbers to each Ambo town
Division after getting a digital map of the Divisional Secretary area indicating the Ambo
urban land divisions from the branch of the Land Information System. A copy of this digital
map should be given to relevant Superintendent of Surveys. The Superintendent of Surveys
should collect the required registers, maps, information, to prepare a work plan for the
Ambo urban land Division which is selected to prepare the Cadastral Map.
The Surveyor should find out from the owner of the land / claimant whether there is a earlier
surveyed plan or a Court Partitioned plan is available and, if there are no big differences in
boundaries in the field and this plan, the Surveyor can proceed after explaining to the Land
Owner / Claimant only if he agree.
The Surveyor should demarcate the boundaries of the land pointed out by the claimant or his
authorized representative with the agreement of the claimants to the adjoining lands. When
there are disagreements to the common boundaries, should work as a mediator to get an
agreement. Still if they are not agreeing to the common boundary, should try to mediate to
reach an agreement along with Field Investigator. The collective agreement must be obtained
as in the form “Procedure to follow for boundary disputes.
23
3.3.6. Establishing ground Control point
All Cadastral Surveys should be connected to the National Survey Control System (GN ).
The Superintendent of Surveys should decide about the additional control points in addition
to the use of existing, sufficiently accurate control points considering the size of the Ambo
town Land Division / Block at the time of dividing the blocks for the preparation of cadastral
maps. The Control Surveys should be done by using G.P.S. or E.D.M. Instruments. The
numbering of control surveys inside cadastral area should be connected to the Cadastral
Map number. The existence of three or more 2nd order national reference systems for each
new control points. The distance between existing 2nd order control point and the new station
shall not be greater than 15km.
All stations shall be marked by tablets of non-corrodible metal and set firmly in posts
of concrete.
The local there shall be the minimum of three local surveying stations in selected
adjudication section within 300 m interval,
A minimum spacing for supplementary control points is 50 meter using total station (100
meter when using GPS).New point shall be shown by authorized cadastral surveyor
24
Figure 1 Order of control point
If the cadastral map is based on Orthophot for aerial photography; Horizontal Accuracy
in RMSE must not exceed two pixels size of Ground Sample Distance (in x and y).
Vertical Accuracy in RMSE must not exceed three pixels size of Ground Sample
Distance (in z).
Regardless of the method, however, the positional accuracy of the final output should
not exceed 40cm at scale of 1:2000.The first task is to assure whether the positional
accuracy of the Orthophotos is within tolerance limit. To examine how well the line map
overlap with orthophotos (Ortho-verification), Geodata base Design Work;
considering selection of appropriate projection, local datum, ellipsoid etc.
But in our investigation or research we focus on ground based preparation of cadastral in case
of Ambo town.
25
3.4. Ground surveying method
3.4.1. Using Real time kinematic (RTK) GPS
Checking the existence of GCP point in the adjudication section.
Reading traverse for existing GCP points to check whether the GCP points moved or
not.
Using one GCP point as the Base and other as Rovers collect the parcel corners.
Checking the GCP reading by mounting the TS on one of points and holding reflector
on the other visible point.
Dansifying the turning points on necessary corners for the traverse computation.
26
Figure 2 data collection using total station.
27
Levelling Total station
Levelling the Total station shall be accomplished as sufficient accuracy otherwise the
instrument does not report accurate result. Levelling instrument take 30 OR 40 minute
Make sure to see all targets from the instrument station before going through process.
28
Step 2: Mount Instrument on Tripod:
Secure with cantering screw wile bracing instrument with the other hand
29
Step3: Focused on surveying point
Adjust the levelling foot screw to centre the surveying point in the optical plummet reticule.
30
Figure 6 levelling the instrument
Release the vertical and horizontal clamps and point telescope to featureless light
background.
Adjust the reticule (i.e. cross hair) Focus Adjustment until reticule image is sharply focus.
Point Telescope ton target and Adjust the focus ring until target is focussed.
31
Move your head from side to side to test for image shift (i.e. parallax).Tangent Screw Use -
When sighting an object, always make the last turn of the tangent
screw, clockwise. This clockwise movement increases the tension on a small spring which
is loaded against the tangent screw. A final turn counterclockwise releases tension and
the spring can temporarily hang up in the heads. A "backlash" error results if the
spring moves after final pointing is made. Cross Hair Use Consistency - Sight each object
with the same part of the cross hair, preferably near the center of the field of view. This
practice will minimize small residual adjustment errors. This procedure is a "must" for
traverse work. Technique - Experiments have proved that the human eye can estimate the
center of a wide object more accurately than it can line up two objects. For this reason,
different pointing techniques should be used.
Digital cadastral map (DKP) is made according to the prescribed specifications. With
topological processing of DKP following data on cadastral parcels are obtained: the number
of parcel, surface and the way of use, address of the parcel and from which parcels of old
survey has formed a new one. These data combined with a holder‟s database is used to create
evidently lists and supporting registers that are used in the process of Public review.
32
A cadaster is a system of major importance for economy and planning. A cadastre
provides data on land. It is the basis for legal aspects like ownership as well as fiscal
aspects like taxation of land. The cadaster also provides data for planning assignments
(for example, boundaries of constructions, land use, and soil). Storage and update of
these data require a complex system that had been developed in Austria during more
than 100 years. Understanding, using, and improving a cadaster requires knowledge on the
cadastral a processes. The problems a cadaster must solve are important to understand the
needs
for a cadaster. It is also important to understand the processes of a cadaster to see how
a cadaster works. These processes define the way a cadaster handles data and what
prerequisites the data must fulfill to be accepted by the cadaster. Improving a system
requires analysis of the processes.
During the survey, the land registry clerks produce new land registration files containing the
data on cadastral parcels and titleholders and reflecting the actual situation. After the
production of all files for the cadastral municipality where the survey has been conducted, the
passes the decision on opening a new land register and closing the old register.
33
Figure 7 The overall prouder of preparation of cadastral map in case of AMBO town
This is not an adequate number of total stations to cover the six Keble districts that fall under
the cadastral jurisdiction, especially under any large scale systematic program.
It had been earlier recommended that cadastral data collection under Task rely heavily on
aerial photography and GPS. Based on the review of technical capacity it is clear that
the use of aerial photography is considerably less likely to happen than was originally
envisioned.
34
Despite having a dedicated unit for the processing of aerial photography and creation of map
products, Ambo town has not yet tested the appropriateness of orthophotos for cadastral maps
in urban areas. It was indicated1 that maps created through aerial surveys would only serve as
a starting point and should be updated with extensive fieldwork using total stations to get
higher absolute accuracy.
The soft ware‟s used in this research in order to analysis the given data were:
Here are lists of Survey instruments used for cadastral surveying
35
CHAPTER FOUR
The importance of the use of the cadaster to support land management has steadily increased.
During the first half of this century the cadastral system served as a basis for managing the
regulations under the Agricultural Holdings Act. During the second half of this century the
cadastral identification has also become an important component for managing a number of
environmental acts. In addition the cadaster provides basic information to support many
activities including the operation of town and country planning processes, construction
planning and implementation, and utility administration.
The basic function of the cadastral map will still be the same even if the maps are
computerized. The benefits will be the multipurpose use of the maps, in combination with
other land data registers and maps, leading towards cadastral based GIS-systems. The concept
of a modern digital cadaster therefore has to face the challenge of being an effective tool to
support the traditional cadastral processes of land transfer and subdivision, as well as being
an efficient tool for land management and administration. The challenge will be to use the
lowest acceptable standard for fulfilling these objectives in order to minimize the costs
of computerization.
36
4.1. Othophoto of Ambotown
That show airl Imagenary of the area within data collected by usingGround surveying
procedur .
37
Figure 9 GD of one neighborhood of AMBO town
38
Figure 10 Parcel of one person ownership
39
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1. Conclusions
Ethiopia is like most developing countries of the world the cadastral surveying technique is
still supported by traditional methodologies. Hence, the output comes from this kind of
methodology is apparently the measurement based identification of the parcels .For instance,
cadastral survey was undertaken in the four regional state (Oromia, Amahara, SNNP &
Tigray) with traditional methods in the first ,second and third level of certification. But, the
size of the plot was determined either using ropes or relying on knowledge of the number
„timed‟ of a plot. In addition the plot is described by naming the neighbors on the N, E, S and
W. Hence, the preparation of cadastral map using the integration of GIS and Total station
in urban areas of Ethiopia have the advantage to accelerate the cadastral map coverage for
the whole country in the upcoming decades. As a result, the integration of these techniques
conducted in the study area „Ambo town‟, to see the possibility and procedures of
methodologies.
Due to their different stages of development, different countries have different capacities for
the development of cadastral systems. In particular, human, technological and financial
resources will determine the most appropriate form of cadastral system to meet the needs of
individual countries.
Thus, a simple low cost manual cadaster recording only private ownership rights may
be appropriate for one country, while a sophisticated and relatively expensive fully
computerized cadaster recording a wide range of ownership and land use rights may be
appropriate for another country.
It is difficult to build a complete and resourceful cadastral map using traditional surveying
techniques in short period of time. Hence, it is better to use an up to date surveying
technologies, such as the integrating of GPS and satellite images with GIS, in order to
enhance and accelerate the level of cadastral map the country
Finally, improving land administration and the cadastral system in particular has the potential
to significantly increase investments in urban development by all producers, improve urban
livelihoods, reduce conflicts over land, reduce land degradation, and improve resource use.
40
Along with other interventions, improved tenure security is vital to creating an environment
in which the urban population is able to survive and prosper and at the same time to adapt to
environmental and other shocks.
5.2. Recommendations
Urban cadastres should be principally maintained at‟ kebele „levels where these would
provide for convenient access to the records, considerable costs will be incurred in the
establishment, staffing, and maintenance of offices at this level.
•Enhancing the capacity for the dissemination of information to the public about the various
land administration reform programs, their impacts, objectives, and ways that they will
impact local resource use.
• The land administration programs should be technological center regarding data
collection for land registration purpose and preparation of cadastral map.
The decision makers should aware enough about the integration of surveying
methodologies such as GPS and high resolution satellite images with GIS effectiveness in
cadastral surveying projects.
• Cadastral surveying project should mainly perform in collaboration with academic
institutes like Adama,Ambo, and many town at oromia Region.
41
6 References
Cay, T., Inam, and Iscan, F., (2003). Application Problems in Graphic Cadaster Sheets, 9 th
of Scientific and technical surveying semposium of Turkey, March 31- April 4, 2003,
Ankara,Turkey.
42