Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Mec610 Test

    Uploaded by

    2022864862

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Mec610 Test

    Uploaded by

    2022864862
    12 views4 pages

    Original Title

    MEC610_TEST

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    12 views4 pages

    Mec610 Test

    Uploaded by

    2022864862

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    MOHAMAD AIMAN SAZWAN BIN SAHARUDIN

    2022864862
    EMD5M1D
    TEST FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (MEC610)

    Structural steel plate

    Figure 1: Total deformation

    Figure 2 : Total equivalent stress


    Titanium alloy plate

    Figure 3:Total deformation

    Figure 4: Total equivalent stress


    Total deformation
    Material Maximum Minimum Average
    Structural steel 4.447× 10−4 0 6.077× 10−5
    Titanium alloy 8.761× 10−4 0 1.134× 10−4

    Equivalent stress(Pa)
    Material Maximum Minimum Average
    Structural steel 5.638× 107 96.11 2.90× 106
    Titanium alloy 5.801× 107 97.946 2.890× 106
    GEOMETRY

    Figure 5: Extrude rod

    Figure 6 : Diameter Rod

    Figure 7: Dimension Plate


    Discussion
    There are notable variations between structural steel and titanium alloy in terms of density,
    strength, and elastic modulus, which have its implications for different sectors. First off,
    Titanium Alloy is denser than structural steel, as seen by its noticeably greater density. This
    may have an impact on weight-sensitive applications like automotive or aerospace
    engineering. Second, the better strength properties of Titanium Alloy, which both exceed the
    maximum and minimum values of Structural Steel, point to the material's potential for
    improved structural integrity and performance in challenging settings. Last but not least,
    titanium alloy's stiffer behaviour is highlighted by its greater elastic modulus, which may be
    advantageous in applications needing precise dimensional stability or resistance to
    deformation under stress. To ensure maximum performance and dependability across a range
    of industrial applications, it is important to comprehend these distinctions in order to make
    educated decisions about material selection and engineering design.

    Conclusion
    Finally, the thorough analysis that was conducted between structural steel and titanium alloy
    clearly highlights the advantage of titanium alloy in terms of density, strength, and elastic
    modulus characteristics. High strength, stiffness, and density are important factors in many
    applications, and the data clearly shows that titanium alloy performs better than structural
    steel in all of these areas. Titanium alloy is the material of choice for challenging applications
    where superior mechanical qualities are needed, whether in the automotive, aerospace, or
    structural engineering fields. This comparison highlights the potential benefits of titanium
    alloy and confirms its status as a top material in sectors where dependability and performance
    are essential requirements.

    You might also like