Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning as an

Emerging AI Technology: A Survey and Future Directions

Jun Zhao Wenhan Yu
School of Computer Science and Engineering Gradute College
Nanyang Technological University Nanyang Technological University
Singapore Singapore
junzhao@ntu.edu.sg wenhan002@e.ntu.edu.sg

Abstract—This paper presents a comprehensive survey of ing with its environment. The agent learns to achieve a goal
Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (QMARL), a in an uncertain, potentially complex environment by trial and
nascent field at the intersection of quantum computing and error, using feedback from its own actions and experiences [3].
multi-agent systems. The survey begins by introducing the
fundamentals of quantum computing, highlighting its potential In recent years, RL has seen significant advancements, leading
to revolutionize computational capabilities. We then delve into to breakthroughs in various domains, such as game-playing,
the principles of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), autonomous vehicles, and robotics [4].
examining how quantum computing can enhance learning effi-
ciency and decision-making processes in complex environments. B. Importance of Multi-Agent Systems
The core of the survey focuses on the current state of QMARL,
reviewing existing literature, methodologies, and case studies that Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are systems composed of mul-
demonstrate the integration of quantum algorithms with MARL tiple interacting agents which may be cooperative, competitive,
frameworks. The paper also addresses the unique challenges and or both. In MAS, agents work together to solve problems
opportunities presented by quantum technologies in multi-agent that are beyond the capability of a single agent [5]. The
systems, such as quantum entanglement and superposition, and complexity of MAS lies in the coordination, communication,
their implications for agent coordination and learning dynamics.
Additionally, the survey explores the practical applications of and negotiation between agents, each with their own goals and
QMARL in various domains, including cybersecurity, finance, capabilities [6].
and robotics, underscoring its transformative potential. The The integration of Reinforcement Learning into Multi-Agent
paper concludes by identifying key research gaps and proposing Systems, known as Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
future directions for the development of QMARL. This includes (MARL), introduces challenges such as the non-stationarity
the need for scalable quantum algorithms, the exploration of
quantum-resistant strategies in adversarial settings, and the of the environment and the partial observation problem. The
integration of quantum principles in agent communication and non-stationary nature of the environment implies that optimal
collaboration. Overall, this survey serves as a foundational guide actions for agents may change over time, adding complexity
for researchers and practitioners interested in the emerging field to the learning process. Additionally, the partial observation
of QMARL, offering insights into its current achievements and problem arises when agents can only access a limited view
future possibilities.
Index Terms—Quantum computing, quantum multi-agent re- of the environment, requiring them to make decisions based
inforcement learning, Quantum AI, quantum neural network, on incomplete information [7]. Addressing these challenges
quantum machine learning, quantum deep learning, multi-agent in MARL involves developing strategies that enable agents to
system. adapt to changing environmental dynamics and make effective
decisions despite having only partial observations.
I. I NTRODUCTION
We first provide a detailed introduction to the paper, setting C. Motivation: Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
the stage for the in-depth exploration of Quantum Multi-Agent Quantum neural networks blend quantum computing princi-
Reinforcement Learning in subsequent sections. ples with artificial intelligence, using qubits for parallel com-
putation and entanglement. This innovative approach shows
A. Background on Quantum Computing and RL promise for solving complex tasks beyond classical neural
The advent of quantum computing marks a paradigm shift in networks, exploring the potential of quantum superposition
computational capabilities, offering unprecedented processing and entanglement for advanced machine learning and opti-
power and efficiency [1]. At its core, quantum computing mization [8]. Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
leverages the principles of quantum mechanics, such as super- (QMARL) utilizes it, emerging as an interdisciplinary field
position and entanglement, to perform complex calculations combining quantum computing with MARL [9]. The motiva-
at speeds unattainable by classical computers. This innovation tion behind QMARL is to harness the power of quantum com-
is not merely a quantitative leap but introduces a qualitative puting to improve learning efficiency. It offers the potential to
transformation in computational approaches [2]. process vast amounts of information simultaneously, which
Reinforcement Learning (RL), a branch of machine learn- is particularly beneficial in MARL, where the complexity
ing, involves an agent learning to make decisions by interact- of the environment and the number of agent interactions

1
can be extremely high. This integration could revolutionize represent a 0, a 1, or any quantum superposition of these
how autonomous systems operate in complex, dynamic envi- states, enabling complex computations.
ronments, leading to advancements in areas like distributed • Quantum Gates: Operations on qubits, similar to logical
control systems, cooperative robotics, and complex decision- gates in classical computing, but can be reversible and
making processes. exploit the properties of quantum mechanics to perform
complex calculations. Examples include the Hadamard
D. Scope and Objectives of the Paper gate, which puts a qubit into a state of superposition, and
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive survey of the the controlled NOT (CNOT) gate, entangling two qubits.
emerging field of QMARL. The objectives are twofold: first, to • Quantum Circuits: Sequences of quantum gates, analo-
explore the current state of research in QMARL, including the- gous to classical circuits, used to perform computations.
oretical foundations, algorithmic developments, and practical The design of quantum circuits is crucial for implement-
applications; and second, to identify future research directions ing quantum algorithms.
and challenges.
The scope of the paper encompasses a review of the C. Quantum Computational Advantages
fundamental principles of quantum computing and MARL,
the integration of quantum techniques in multi-agent envi- Quantum computers have the potential to solve certain
ronments, and an analysis of the current achievements and problems much faster than classical computers. This advantage
limitations in this field. By doing so, the paper seeks to offer comes from their ability to process and manipulate large
a foundational understanding of QMARL and to inspire further amounts of data simultaneously through superposition and to
research and innovation in this exciting and rapidly evolving utilize entanglement for complex problem-solving [2]. Key
domain. areas of advantage include:
• Optimization Problems: Quantum algorithms can explore
II. F UNDAMENTALS OF Q UANTUM C OMPUTING a vast solution space more efficiently, offering potentially
In this section, we will introduce the fundamental concepts faster solutions for complex optimization problems.
of quantum computing, laying the groundwork for understand- • Simulation of Quantum Systems: Quantum computers
ing how these principles can be applied to enhance MARL in can natively simulate other quantum systems, making
later sections. them ideal for research in fields like material science,
chemistry, and physics.
A. Basic Principles of Quantum Mechanics for Computing • Cryptography and Security: Quantum computing can
Quantum computing is grounded in the principles of quan- theoretically break many current cryptographic protocols
tum mechanics, a fundamental theory in physics describing but also offers pathways to far stronger, quantum-resistant
nature at the smallest scales of energy levels of atoms and encryption methods.
subatomic particles [2]. Key principles include: • Machine Learning and Data Analysis: The ability to
process large datasets simultaneously and perform com-
• Superposition: Unlike classical bits, which are either 0
plex calculations quickly makes quantum computing a
or 1, quantum bits (qubits) can exist in multiple states
promising tool for advanced machine learning and data
simultaneously due to superposition. This principle al-
analytics.
lows quantum computers to process a vast number of
calculations at once, significantly increasing computing
power. D. Quantum vs. Classical Computing
• Entanglement: Quantum entanglement is a phenomenon
It is essential to note that quantum computing is not simply
where pairs or groups of particles interact in ways such a faster version of classical computing. Instead, it represents
that the quantum state of each particle cannot be de- a fundamentally different way of processing information, suit-
scribed independently of the others. This interconnect- able for specific types of problems. While quantum computing
edness allows for faster and more efficient information shows great promise, it is not a universal solution for all
processing in quantum computing. computational tasks and currently faces significant technical
• Quantum Interference: It is the principle where multiple
challenges, including error rates, qubit coherence times, and
probability amplitudes associated with quantum states can scalability issues.
add or subtract from each other. Quantum algorithms
exploit this interference to find solutions to problems
III. P RINCIPLES OF M ULTI -AGENT R EINFORCEMENT
more efficiently than classical algorithms.
L EARNING (MARL)
B. Key Quantum Computing Concepts
This section provides a detailed overview of the principles,
Important notions in quantum computing is as follows: challenges, and methodologies of MARL, setting the stage for
• Qubits: The fundamental unit of quantum information, discussing the integration of quantum computing techniques in
analogous to the bit in classical computing. Qubits can this domain in subsequent sections.

2
A. Definition and Scope of MARL Competitive Learning: Agents have opposing goals, typi-
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) extends the cal in game-theoretic scenarios. Learning in such environments
framework of single-agent reinforcement learning to scenarios often involves developing strategies to outperform adversaries.
involving multiple agents [10]. Each agent in MARL interacts Mixed-Motive Learning: A blend of cooperative and
with the environment and possibly with other agents, learning competitive elements, where agents have both shared and
to optimize their behavior based on a reward signal. MARL is individual objectives.
applicable in diverse fields, including robotics, autonomous ve- E. Approaches to MARL
hicles, economics, and game theory, where multiple decision-
Various approaches have been developed to tackle the
makers are involved.
complexities of MARL [10]:
B. Key Concepts in MARL Value-Based Methods: These methods extend Q-learning
and other value-based techniques to multi-agent settings, often
We present crucial concepts in MARL as follows:
requiring adaptations to handle non-stationarity and coordina-
States: In MARL, the state represents the collective status
tion issues.
of the environment and all agents within it. Due to the presence
Policy-Based Methods: Techniques like multi-agent actor-
of multiple agents, the state space becomes significantly more
critic methods directly learn policies and are more suited for
complex compared to single-agent systems.
continuous action spaces and complex interaction dynamics.
Actions: Each agent in MARL chooses actions based on
Recent multi-agent actor-critic methods often utilize Central-
its policy. The joint action space, encompassing the actions
ized Training with Decentralized Execution (CTDE) struc-
of all agents, grows exponentially with the number of agents,
ture [12], where agents are trained together in a centralized
adding to the complexity.
manner but act independently during execution. This approach
Rewards: Rewards in MARL can be individual (pertaining
balances the need for coordination during learning with the
to each agent’s goals) or collective (shared among agents).
requirement for autonomous operation.
Designing reward structures that promote both individual and
Model-Based Approaches: These approaches involve
collective objectives is a key challenge.
learning models of the environment and other agents, useful
Policies: A policy in MARL defines the behavior of an
for planning and predictive decision-making.
agent, mapping states to actions. In deep reinforcement learn-
ing, policies are also represented by neural networks. F. Theoretical Foundations and Algorithmic Developments
C. Challenges in MARL Recent advances in MARL algorithms have been grounded
in both empirical results and theoretical analysis. Theoretical
MARL introduces several challenges not present in single- work has focused on convergence properties, stability under
agent reinforcement learning [7]: non-stationarity, and optimality in various settings. Algorith-
Non-Stationarity: The environment in MARL is inherently mic developments include adaptations of deep learning tech-
non-stationary from the perspective of any single agent, as the niques to MARL, leading to the emergence of deep MARL,
actions of other agents continually change the environment’s which combines the representational power of deep neural
dynamics. networks with the dynamic learning capabilities of MARL.
Partial Observability: Agents often have limited informa-
tion about the state of the environment and the intentions or IV. I NTEGRATION OF Q UANTUM C OMPUTING IN MARL
actions of other agents, leading to uncertainty in decision- We now delve into the theoretical and practical aspects of in-
making. tegrating quantum computing with multi-agent reinforcement
Scalability: The exponential growth of the state-action learning, outlining the potential benefits and challenges of this
space with the number of agents makes many MARL problems innovative approach. This section sets the stage for a deeper
computationally challenging. exploration of current achievements and future prospects in
Coordination: Agents must learn to coordinate their ac- the subsequent sections.
tions, which is particularly challenging in environments where
A. Theoretical Foundation of Quantum MARL (QMARL)
communication between agents is limited or non-existent.
Credit Assignment: Determining the contribution of each The integration of quantum computing into Multi-Agent
agent to the collective outcome is difficult, especially in Reinforcement Learning (MARL) forms the basis of Quan-
cooperative settings, where there is numerous heterogeneous tum MARL (QMARL) [13]. This integration aims to exploit
state and reward information. quantum computational advantages to address the complexities
inherent in MARL. The theoretical foundation of QMARL lies
D. Learning Paradigms in MARL in the application of quantum principles—such as superposi-
MARL encompasses several learning paradigms, each suited tion, entanglement, and quantum interference—to the learning
to different scenarios [11]: processes of agents in a multi-agent system.
Cooperative Learning: All agents work towards a common • Quantum Superposition in State Representation: Quan-
goal, often requiring sophisticated coordination and commu- tum superposition allows for the representation of mul-
nication strategies. tiple states simultaneously [9]. In QMARL, this can

3
 be used to represent the exponentially large state space • Improved Scalability: The compact representation of
of multi-agent environments more compactly, enabling states and the potential for efficient computation can
agents to process and evaluate a multitude of possible improve the scalability of MARL algorithms, enabling
environmental states in parallel. them to handle larger and more complex multi-agent
• Entanglement and Agent Coordination: Quantum entan- systems.
glement can potentially be harnessed to develop novel
coordination mechanisms among agents [13]. In scenarios D. Challenges in Realizing Quantum MARL
where agent coordination is crucial, entangled states
While QMARL holds great promise, there are significant
can be used to create correlations between the actions
challenges in its realization [16]:
of different agents, leading to more synchronized and
efficient decision-making processes. • Hardware Limitations: Current quantum computers are
• Quantum Interference and Policy Optimization: Quan- limited in terms of qubit count and coherence times,
tum interference could be used to enhance the policy restricting the complexity of problems they can tackle.
optimization process in MARL [13]. By exploiting con- • Error Rates and Decoherence: Quantum systems are
structive and destructive interference patterns, quantum prone to errors and loss of quantum state (decoherence),
algorithms can theoretically navigate the policy space which can significantly impact the reliability of quantum
more efficiently than classical algorithms, leading to MARL algorithms.
faster convergence to optimal policies. • Algorithmic Complexity: Designing quantum algorithms
that can effectively exploit quantum advantages for
B. Quantum-Enhanced Learning Algorithms MARL is a complex task, requiring advancements in both
quantum computing and reinforcement learning theories.
Quantum-enhanced learning algorithms aim to leverage the
• Interoperability with Classical Systems: Integrating quan-
computational superiority of quantum mechanics to improve
tum computing into existing classical MARL frameworks
the efficiency and effectiveness of learning in MARL. These
poses significant challenges in terms of compatibility and
algorithms can be categorized as follows:
interoperability.
• Quantum Versions of Classical Algorithms: Algorithms
like Q-learning and policy gradient methods can be V. C URRENT S TATE OF QMARL
adapted to quantum frameworks. For example, a quan-
tum Q-learning algorithm could perform updates on a This section will provide an overview of the current state of
superposition of state-action pairs, thereby accelerating Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning, highlighting
the learning process [13]. its potential, the progress made so far, and the challenges that
• Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms: These algorithms need to be addressed. This sets the stage for discussing future
combine quantum and classical computing elements, aim- research directions and the potential impact of QMARL in
ing to capitalize on the strengths of both. For instance, a various fields.
hybrid algorithm might use a quantum processor for com-
plex optimization tasks within a larger classical MARL A. Literature Review of Existing Research and Methodologies
framework. The current state of Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement
• Quantum Machine Learning for MARL: Quantum ma-
Learning (QMARL) is at a nascent stage, with research
chine learning techniques [14], such as quantum neural primarily focused on theoretical foundations and small-scale
networks [15] and quantum deep learning [17], can be experimental implementations. Early studies have begun to
utilized to handle the high-dimensional data and com- explore the integration of quantum computing principles into
plex models often involved in MARL. These techniques MARL frameworks, offering preliminary insights into the
can potentially offer faster training times and improved potential and challenges of this interdisciplinary field [17].
performance for agent learning.
1) Quantum Algorithms for MARL: Initial research has cen-
tered around adapting existing MARL algorithms to quantum
C. Benefits of Quantum Approaches in Complex Decision-
settings. For instance, studies have investigated quantum ver-
Making
sions of classic algorithms like Q-learning and policy gradient
The application of quantum computing to MARL offers methods, with modifications to exploit quantum superposition
several theoretical benefits: and entanglement for efficient state-action evaluations [13],
• Efficient Exploration of Policy Space: Quantum algo- [18].
rithms can explore the policy space more efficiently, 2) Simulation Studies: Due to the limitations of current
which is particularly beneficial in high-dimensional quantum hardware, many studies rely on simulations to test
MARL environments. quantum MARL algorithms. These simulations often use clas-
• Enhanced Computational Speed: Quantum parallelism sical computers to emulate quantum computational processes,
can significantly speed up computations needed for learn- providing valuable insights into the potential performance and
ing and decision-making processes in MARL. scalability of QMARL systems [13].

4
 3) Small-Scale Experimental Implementations: There have VI. C HALLENGES AND O PPORTUNITIES IN QMARL
been experimental implementations of QMARL on available
In this section, we will examine the challenges and opportu-
quantum hardware, albeit on a limited scale. These experi-
nities inherent in the integration of quantum computing with
ments primarily focus on simple environments and scenarios to
multi-agent reinforcement learning. The discussion includes
test the feasibility of quantum-enhanced learning and decision-
the technical hurdles, the potential transformative impact on
making processes in multi-agent settings.
various domains, and the broader societal and ethical implica-
tions of QMARL.
B. Comparative Analysis with Classical MARL Approaches
A. Technical Challenges in QMARL
Comparative studies between quantum and classical MARL
approaches are crucial for understanding the advantages and The advancement of Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement
limitations of QMARL. Initial comparisons suggest that quan- Learning (QMARL) faces several technical challenges that
tum approaches could offer significant computational advan- are critical to address for its successful development and
tages in specific scenarios, particularly those involving com- implementation.
plex, high-dimensional state spaces and the need for efficient 1) Quantum Hardware Maturity: The current generation of
coordination among a large number of agents [19]. However, quantum computers, often referred to as Noisy Intermediate-
these advantages are currently theoretical and contingent on Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, is limited by factors such as
advancements in quantum computing technology. qubit count, coherence times, and error rates. These limitations
constrain the complexity and scale of QMARL applications
C. Case Studies and Practical Applications that can be feasibly implemented.
2) Error Correction and Noise: Quantum systems are
Although practical applications of QMARL are still largely inherently susceptible to errors and noise, which can sig-
theoretical, several potential use cases have been identified: nificantly impact the reliability and accuracy of QMARL
1) Distributed Control Systems: QMARL could enhance algorithms [16]. Developing robust quantum error correction
the efficiency and effectiveness of distributed control systems methods is crucial for the practical application of QMARL.
in sectors like energy management and traffic control, where 3) Algorithmic Complexity: Designing efficient QMARL
multiple agents must coordinate to optimize overall system algorithms that can effectively leverage quantum computa-
performance [17]. tional advantages while addressing the challenges of multi-
2) Financial Modeling: In finance, QMARL can potentially agent environments is a complex task. It requires a deep
be used for high-frequency trading and risk management, understanding of both quantum computing and reinforcement
where agents need to make rapid and complex decisions based learning principles.
on a multitude of factors [20]. 4) Resource Optimization: Quantum resources are ex-
3) Robotics and Autonomous Systems: QMARL has the po- pensive and scarce. Efficiently utilizing these resources for
tential to significantly improve the coordination and decision- QMARL, such as optimizing qubit usage and quantum oper-
making processes in multi-robot systems, including search and ations, is a significant challenge.
rescue operations and autonomous vehicle fleets [21].
B. Opportunities Presented by Quantum Technologies
D. Challenges and Limitations Despite these challenges, the integration of quantum com-
puting with MARL presents unique opportunities that have the
The development of QMARL faces several challenges as potential to revolutionize various domains.
discussed below. 1) Enhanced Computational Capabilities: Quantum com-
1) Quantum Hardware Limitations: The current state of puters can theoretically process information at an exponen-
quantum hardware, characterized by limited qubit numbers tially faster rate than classical computers in certain scenarios.
and high error rates, restricts the complexity of problems that This capability could enable more efficient exploration and
QMARL algorithms can handle. exploitation in MARL, leading to faster learning and better
2) Scalability Issues: Scaling QMARL algorithms to han- decision-making.
dle real-world problems with numerous agents and complex 2) Complex Problem Solving: The ability of quantum com-
environments remains a significant challenge. puters to handle high-dimensional data and complex models
3) Theoretical and Algorithmic Development: The field could be particularly beneficial in addressing challenges in
requires further theoretical development to fully understand MARL that are currently intractable with classical computing
and exploit the advantages of quantum computing in multi- methods.
agent settings. 3) Innovative Coordination Mechanisms: Quantum entan-
4) Integration with Classical Systems: Seamlessly integrat- glement and superposition offer novel ways of coordinating
ing quantum algorithms into existing classical MARL frame- actions and sharing information among agents in a multi-agent
works is a non-trivial task that requires careful consideration system, potentially leading to more efficient collaborative
of compatibility and interoperability issues. strategies.

5
 4) Advancement in Theoretical Understanding: The explo- 1) Smart Grids and Energy Management: QMARL can
ration of QMARL contributes to the broader understanding of significantly optimize the operation of smart grids, where
both quantum computing and multi-agent systems, potentially multiple agents (such as distributed energy resources and stor-
leading to new theoretical insights and methodologies. age systems) must coordinate to balance supply and demand
effectively. Quantum computing can enhance the decision-
C. Implications for Agent Coordination and Learning Dynam- making process in real-time, leading to more efficient energy
ics distribution and usage [27].
2) Traffic and Transportation Management: In traffic con-
The application of quantum principles in multi-agent sys-
trol systems, QMARL can optimize the flow of vehicles by
tems could lead to fundamentally different approaches to agent
enabling rapid processing of data from various sources (e.g.,
coordination and learning dynamics.
traffic lights, sensors) and facilitating coordination among
1) Quantum Communication: Utilizing quantum commu-
them to reduce congestion and improve safety.
nication channels can potentially enhance the efficiency and
security of information exchange between agents, impacting B. Financial Modeling and Algorithmic Trading
their coordination strategies [22].
QMARL can be used in finance, as discussed below [20].
2) Quantum Game Theory: The principles of quantum 1) Portfolio Management: Quantum-enhanced algorithms
mechanics applied to game-theoretic aspects of MARL could can process vast market data more efficiently, helping in
lead to new equilibria concepts and strategies, differing sig- the optimization of investment portfolios. QMARL can assist
nificantly from classical game theory [23]. in dynamically adjusting portfolios in response to market
3) Adaptive and Responsive Learning: The ability of quan- changes, maximizing returns while minimizing risks.
tum systems to process multiple possibilities simultaneously 2) High-Frequency Trading: In high-frequency trading,
could lead to more adaptive and responsive learning algorithms where milliseconds can make a significant difference,
in dynamic and uncertain environments. QMARL’s ability to rapidly analyze and act on market data
4) Societal and Ethical Considerations: The development can provide a substantial edge.
of QMARL also raises important societal and ethical consid-
erations [24]. We need to reflect on the potential impacts on C. Robotics and Autonomous Systems
various aspects of society, including privacy concerns, data We also present how QMARL can be useful for robotics
security, and the implications of advanced decision-making and autonomous systems [21].
algorithms on human agency. 1) Cooperative Robotics: In scenarios like search and res-
5) Impact on Employment and Industries: The potential cue or exploration missions, QMARL can enable a team of
efficiency and capabilities of QMARL systems could sig- robots to efficiently divide tasks, share information, and make
nificantly impact labor markets and industries, necessitating collective decisions, improving the overall effectiveness of the
considerations for workforce adaptation and ethical deploy- mission.
ment [25]. 2) Autonomous Vehicle Fleets: QMARL can enhance the
6) Data Privacy and Security: The integration of quantum coordination among autonomous vehicles, optimizing routes,
computing in MARL could lead to both opportunities and reducing traffic congestion, and improving safety by rapidly
challenges in data privacy and security, requiring careful processing environmental data and predicting the actions of
consideration of the ethical implications of data handling and other vehicles and pedestrians.
protection [26].
7) Accessibility and Inclusivity: Ensuring equitable access D. Cybersecurity
to the benefits of QMARL technologies is crucial. There is QMARL can also be beneficial for cybersecurity [26].
a risk that the advanced nature of these technologies could 1) Quantum-Resistant Security Protocols: As quantum
exacerbate existing digital divides. computing poses a threat to traditional encryption methods,
QMARL can aid in developing new, quantum-resistant security
VII. P RACTICAL A PPLICATIONS OF QMARL protocols, ensuring data integrity and confidentiality.
2) Network Security: In network security, QMARL can
Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (QMARL)
be used to detect and respond to threats more efficiently,
holds the potential to revolutionize a variety of fields by offer-
by analyzing network traffic in real-time and coordinating
ing enhanced computational capabilities and novel approaches
responses among multiple security agents.
to problem-solving. This section explores potential practical
applications of QMARL, illustrating how its unique properties E. Medical Research
could be leveraged in real-world scenarios.
We can leverage QMARL in medicine [28]. For example,
QMARL can accelerate the drug discovery process by effi-
A. Distributed Control Systems
ciently simulating molecular interactions. Also, in personal-
QMARL can be applied to distributed control systems as ized medicine, it can aid in analyzing patient data to tailor
follows. treatments to individual needs.

6
F. Limitations and Challenges in Practical Implementation C. Integration of Quantum and Classical Systems
While the potential applications of QMARL are vast, there Quantum and classical systems may be integrated as follows
are significant challenges in its practical implementation: in the future for QMARL.
1) Technology Maturity: The current state of quantum com- 1) Hybrid Quantum-Classical MARL Frameworks: Devel-
puting technology limits the immediate practical application of oping hybrid frameworks that effectively integrate quantum
QMARL [25]. Advances in quantum hardware and algorithmic and classical computing elements can be a practical approach
development are necessary for these applications to become to leveraging the strengths of both. This includes research
feasible. into algorithms that can operate across quantum and classical
2) Data Privacy and Ethical Concerns: Implementing platforms seamlessly.
QMARL in fields like healthcare and finance raises concerns 2) Interoperability and Standardization: Establishing stan-
regarding data privacy and ethical use of technology. Ensuring dards and protocols for the interoperability of quantum and
secure and responsible use of QMARL is paramount. classical systems in MARL is essential. This ensures com-
3) Integration with Existing Systems: Seamlessly integrat- patibility and facilitates the adoption of QMARL in diverse
ing QMARL solutions with existing infrastructures and sys- applications.
tems presents a considerable challenge, requiring careful plan- D. Theoretical Developments
ning and execution. We present theoretical directions for QMARL below.
1) Quantum Game Theory for MARL: Extending classical
VIII. F UTURE R ESEARCH D IRECTIONS IN QMARL game theory to quantum domains can provide new insights
The nascent field of Quantum Multi-Agent Reinforcement into agent interactions in QMARL. Research in this area could
Learning (QMARL) presents a rich tapestry of research oppor- lead to the development of novel strategies and equilibrium
tunities. This section outlines key areas where future research concepts in multi-agent settings.
is essential to advance the field, addressing both the challenges 2) Quantum Information Theory in MARL: Applying quan-
and harnessing the potential of QMARL. tum information theory to MARL can deepen our understand-
ing of information processing and sharing among agents in a
A. Advancements in Quantum Algorithms quantum framework.
We discuss future work in quantum algorithms for QMARL. E. Ethical and Societal Implications
1) Algorithmic Efficiency: Developing more efficient quan- Ethical and societal considerations for QMARL need to be
tum algorithms for MARL is crucial. Future research should addressed.
focus on creating algorithms that can fully exploit quantum 1) Addressing Ethical Concerns: As with any emerging
parallelism and entanglement, reducing computational com- technology, it is crucial to address the ethical implications of
plexity and enhancing learning efficiency. QMARL. Research should focus on developing frameworks
2) Error Correction and Noise Resilience: As quantum and guidelines for the responsible use of QMARL, considering
systems are prone to errors, research into robust quantum aspects like data privacy, security, and societal impact.
error correction methods specifically tailored for QMARL is 2) Policy and Regulatory Frameworks: Developing policy
essential. This includes developing algorithms that are resilient and regulatory frameworks to govern the use of QMARL tech-
to noise and decoherence, ensuring reliable and accurate nology is essential to ensure its safe and beneficial application.
learning outcomes.
F. Diverse Application Domains
3) Scalability of Quantum Algorithms: Current quantum
algorithms face scalability challenges. Research should aim to Future applications for QMARL can be investigated.
design algorithms that can scale with the increasing number of 1) Exploring New Applications: Identifying and exploring
agents and the complexity of environments, making QMARL new application domains for QMARL is crucial for its evolu-
applicable to real-world scenarios. tion. This includes fields like environmental modeling, social
dynamics, and complex system optimization.
B. Quantum Hardware Development 2) Cross-Disciplinary Research: Encouraging cross-
disciplinary research involving quantum physics, computer
Future studies about quantum hardware for QMARL are as
science, economics, sociology, and other fields can foster
follows.
innovative applications and a deeper understanding of
1) Enhancing Qubit Stability and Coherence: Improving
QMARL.
the stability and coherence time of qubits is fundamental for
the practical application of QMARL. Research in materials IX. C ONCLUSION
science and quantum engineering is crucial to achieving these This concluding section encapsulates the essence of the
improvements. survey, reiterating the potential and challenges of QMARL. It
2) Increasing Qubit Count: To handle complex MARL emphasizes the need for continued research and responsible
problems, a higher qubit count is necessary. Advances in quan- innovation, envisioning a future where quantum-enhanced
tum hardware that can provide more qubits, while maintaining multi-agent systems redefine the boundaries of computational
or improving fidelity, are vital. possibilities.

7
A. Summary of Findings R EFERENCES
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of Quantum
Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (QMARL), an emerging [1] E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient
quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature, vol. 409, no. 6816,
field at the intersection of quantum computing and multi-agent pp. 46–52, 2001.
systems. Exploring the integration of quantum mechanics into [2] L. Gyongyosi and S. Imre, “A survey on quantum computing technol-
multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), we highlight its ogy,” Computer Science Review, vol. 31, pp. 51–71, 2019.
potential to enhance learning efficiency and decision-making [3] R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction.
in complex environments. The survey reveals the early stage MIT press, 2018.
of QMARL, marked by theoretical explorations and initial [4] N. C. Luong, D. T. Hoang, S. Gong, D. Niyato, P. Wang, Y.-C.
Liang, and D. I. Kim, “Applications of deep reinforcement learning
experiments. Despite current quantum technology limitations, in communications and networking: A survey,” IEEE Communications
QMARL’s transformative impact is evident in potential appli- Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3133–3174, 2019.
cations, including distributed control systems, financial mod- [5] A. Dorri, S. S. Kanhere, and R. Jurdak, “Multi-agent systems: A survey,”
eling, and autonomous systems. IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 28 573–28 593, 2018.
[6] F. Alzetta, P. Giorgini, A. Najjar, M. I. Schumacher, and D. Calvaresi,
“In-time explainability in multi-agent systems: Challenges, opportuni-
B. Implications for the Field of QMARL ties, and roadmap,” in International Workshop on Explainable, Trans-
parent Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. Springer, 2020,
The integration of quantum computing into MARL rep- pp. 39–53.
resents a significant advancement, addressing scalability, [7] W. Du and S. Ding, “A survey on multi-agent deep reinforcement
decision-making efficiency, and complex coordination dynam- learning: from the perspective of challenges and applications,” Artificial
ics. Theoretical and experimental progress in QMARL can Intelligence Review, vol. 54, pp. 3215–3238, 2021.
deepen our understanding of both quantum computing and [8] F. V. Massoli, L. Vadicamo, G. Amato, and F. Falchi, “A leap among
quantum computing and quantum neural networks: A survey,” ACM
multi-agent systems, pushing computational boundaries. Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1–37, 2022.
Although practical applications are largely theoretical, [9] S. Y.-C. Chen, C.-M. Huang, C.-W. Hsing, H.-S. Goan, and Y.-J. Kao,
QMARL suggests a future where complex multi-agent prob- “Variational quantum reinforcement learning via evolutionary optimiza-
lems can be efficiently addressed, from optimizing smart grid tion,” Machine Learning: Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, p.
015025, 2022.
energy distribution to enhancing financial market decision-
[10] T. Li, K. Zhu, N. C. Luong, D. Niyato, Q. Wu, Y. Zhang, and B. Chen,
making. “Applications of multi-agent reinforcement learning in future internet:
A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials,
C. Challenges and Future Perspectives vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1240–1279, 2022.
[11] K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and T. Başar, “Multi-agent reinforcement learning:
Despite its promise, the field of QMARL faces significant A selective overview of theories and algorithms,” Handbook of rein-
challenges. The current limitations of quantum hardware, forcement learning and control, pp. 321–384, 2021.
including qubit stability and coherence, pose substantial ob- [12] P. K. Sharma, R. Fernandez, E. Zaroukian, M. Dorothy, A. Basak,
and D. E. Asher, “Survey of recent multi-agent reinforcement learning
stacles to the practical implementation of QMARL algorithms. algorithms utilizing centralized training,” in Artificial Intelligence and
Additionally, the complexity of integrating quantum com- Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications III, vol.
puting principles into MARL algorithms requires substan- 11746. SPIE, 2021, pp. 665–676.
tial theoretical and algorithmic advancements. The future of [13] W. J. Yun, J. Park, and J. Kim, “Quantum multi-agent meta reinforce-
ment learning,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial
QMARL depends on continued research and development in Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 9, 2023, pp. 11 087–11 095.
both quantum computing and MARL. This includes not only [14] M. Cerezo, G. Verdon, H.-Y. Huang, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles,
technological advancements but also a focus on the ethical and “Challenges and opportunities in quantum machine learning,” Nature
societal implications of deploying such powerful technologies. Computational Science, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 567–576, 2022.
The development of robust policy and regulatory frameworks [15] A. Abbas, D. Sutter, C. Zoufal, A. Lucchi, A. Figalli, and S. Woerner,
will be essential to guide the responsible use of QMARL. “The power of quantum neural networks,” Nature Computational Sci-
ence, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 403–409, 2021.
[16] A. Melnikov, M. Kordzanganeh, A. Alodjants, and R.-K. Lee, “Quantum
D. Final Thoughts on the Future of Quantum Technologies in machine learning: From physics to software engineering,” Advances in
Multi-Agent Systems Physics: X, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 2165452, 2023.
[17] R. Yan, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, and J. Dai, “A multiagent quantum deep
As we stand at the cusp of a new era in computing, reinforcement learning method for distributed frequency control of
the prospect of quantum-enhanced multi-agent systems offers islanded microgrids,” IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems,
a glimpse into a future with unprecedented computational vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1622–1632, 2022.
capabilities. The journey towards realizing the full potential [18] W. J. Yun, Y. Kwak, J. P. Kim, H. Cho, S. Jung, J. Park, and
J. Kim, “Quantum multi-agent reinforcement learning via variational
of QMARL will undoubtedly be challenging, but the rewards quantum circuit design,” in 2022 IEEE 42nd International Conference
promise to be transformative. It is an exciting time for re- on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1332–
searchers and practitioners in the field and in Quantum AI 1335.
generally, as each advancement brings us closer to unlocking [19] C. Park, W. J. Yun, J. P. Kim, T. K. Rodrigues, S. Park, S. Jung,
and J. Kim, “Quantum multi-agent actor-critic networks for cooperative
the full potential of quantum technologies in solving some of mobile access in multi-uav systems,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal,
the most complex problems in multi-agent systems. 2023.

8
[20] M. Pistoia, S. F. Ahmad, A. Ajagekar, A. Buts, S. Chakrabarti, D. Her-
man, S. Hu, A. Jena, P. Minssen, P. Niroula, A. Rattew, Y. Sun, and
R. Yalovetzky, “Quantum machine learning for finance iccad special
session paper,” in 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Com-
puter Aided Design (ICCAD). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–9.
[21] W. J. Yun, J. P. Kim, S. Jung, J.-H. Kim, and J. Kim, “Quantum multi-
agent actor-critic neural networks for internet-connected multi-robot
coordination in smart factory management,” IEEE Internet of Things
Journal, 2023.
[22] D. Cozzolino, B. Da Lio, D. Bacco, and L. K. Oxenløwe, “High-
dimensional quantum communication: benefits, progress, and future
challenges,” Advanced Quantum Technologies, vol. 2, no. 12, p.
1900038, 2019.
[23] J. Bostanci and J. Watrous, “Quantum game theory and the complexity
of approximating quantum nash equilibria,” Quantum, vol. 6, p. 882,
2022.
[24] M. Kop, “Establishing a legal-ethical framework for quantum technol-
ogy,” Yale Law School, Yale Journal of Law & Technology (YJoLT), The
Record, 2021.
[25] E. Pelucchi, G. Fagas, I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, E. Figueroa,
Q. Gong, H. Hannes, J. Liu, C.-Y. Lu, N. Matsuda, J.-W. Pan, F. Schreck,
F. Sciarrino, C. Silberhorn, J. Wang, and K. D. Jöns, “The potential and
global outlook of integrated photonics for quantum technologies,” Nature
Reviews Physics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 194–208, 2022.
[26] L. Malina, P. Dzurenda, S. Ricci, J. Hajny, G. Srivastava, R. Mat-
ulevičius, A.-A. O. Affia, M. Laurent, N. H. Sultan, and Q. Tang, “Post-
quantum era privacy protection for intelligent infrastructures,” IEEE
Access, vol. 9, pp. 36 038–36 077, 2021.
[27] P.-Y. Kong, “A review of quantum key distribution protocols in the per-
spective of smart grid communication security,” IEEE Systems Journal,
vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 41–54, 2020.
[28] D. Maheshwari, B. Garcia-Zapirain, and D. Sierra-Sosa, “Quantum
machine learning applications in the biomedical domain: A systematic
review,” IEEE Access, 2022.