Suburbia BIA3021
Suburbia BIA3021
Suburbia BIA3021
Quality of Life
buildings. A virtual study visit to Tokyo, Japan, will explore families. pollution
Health and Well-being: Diverse Communities
Over 50% minorities.
urban planning and contextual influences. An expert will also Public Transit
Access to nature Suburbs are becoming more diverse
Accessibility:
provide insights through a webinar. Economically Challenged Suburbs Fair Distance to Lower population =
Economically Middle- Affluent
Disadvantaged Income Suburbs
Slow growth and struggles to stations, reliability, less crowded = Suburbs Suburbs
Increased density, commercial hubs, zoning Urban: 93.5% Bordered by: Chiba (east), (25-30°C / 77-86°F) million people. Harmony: Central to social Shintoism: Focuses on
Density: 338 people/km² Yamanashi (west), Kanagawa possible typhoons
Language Family: Japonic, interactions and arts. ancestor worship and nature
Median age: 49.1 years (south), Saitama (north)
Winter specifically the Japanese- Traditional Arts: Calligraphy, reverence. Worship sites are
Greater Tokyo Area: Includes
4 Western Influence (1868-1900) Birth rate: 1.34 children per woman (Dec-Feb) Ryukyuan branch. flower arrangement, tea called jinja (shrines), marked by
phases
HISTORY OF TAMA
Tama Area Overview Tama New Town Development History Infrastructure and Layout
Location : Spans Tama City, Hachioji Pre-Development: Residential Districts: Population per District:
21
Machida City, Inagi City
12k-20k
Rugged, wooded landscapes
Size : 3,000 hectares each around
with agricultural villages.
Purpose : Address Tokyo's housing Planning Phase: 1960s-1970s. 100 hectares residents
shortage, green spaces.
Goals:
Facilities:
Residents
cities
26
Key Developments:
village town
First Districts Occupied: Start: Built as a solution to Tokyo's housing needs. The term "New Town" in Japan can refer to various types of residential areas, from districts and apartment units to small housing lots. Tama New Town, one of the largest,
Suwa and Nagayama
Growth: was planned for 410,000 residents over 3,014 hectares. The Japanese word "machi" adds to the confusion, as it can mean anything from an independent town to a small
Housing: Building Style: Self-Sufficient Urban Area: Developed businesses, block or alley, leading to a broad use of "New Town."
Initial units were all rental 5-story blocks without universities, and institutions.
apartments, primarily 2DK or elevators, arranged in
Tama Center: Became a regional hub for shopping,
3DK, around 50m². south-facing rows.
Advertising often uses terms like "Château" or "Mansion" to suggest luxury, even if the properties aren't upscale. Unlike British new towns, which are independent with
entertainment, and services.
Issues: local jobs, Japanese new towns are primarily residential, serving as suburban areas for city workers. For example, Tama New Town, 30 km west of Tokyo, was designed in
Variety: Many different types of businesses and
Small, quickly built the 1960s to provide housing and limit city sprawl. It mainly features residential zones with some schools, parks, and commercial centers, but lacks sufficient local jobs,
apartments; traffic congestion universities here.
to train stations. Issues: Some people leaving, and there's an older making it a commuter town for Tokyo workers.
population.
Mid-Development Phase Plans: Bring in new businesses, make it attractive for
everyone, and improve roads and buildings.
RESIDENTIAL CONNECTIVITY INFRASTRUCTURE COMMUNITY
Expanded Housing: Goal: Keep growing and stay strong for the future.
Varied Architecture: Administrative Changes: Origins: Family-Friendly Start:
Larger units introduced in districts like
Mid-rise buildings with green Tama's growth led to boundary Developed in the 1960s and 1970s to Planned for families with kids,
Toyogaoka
spaces give Tama its adjustments but kept its city solve Tokyo's housing shortage and attracted by green spaces and
Demographics: suburban feel. status. preserve nature. suburban life.
Predominantly young families, resulting TAMA SUBURBAN - SHRINKING CITIES Around Tama Center, taller
in a high ratio of children.
buildings create an urban Land Development: Smart Infrastructure: Growing Diversity:
vibe with mixed-use areas. Started in 1968, transforming old Designed for 150,000 people, with Professionals from nearby
Challenges: Current Trends: areas into bustling zones by 1989. railways, roads, and water from the businesses and students from
Temporary Living: Tama and Yūgi sectors became Tama River. universities add variety.
Shortage of schools and educational Cities and suburbs are
staff; heavy reliance on cars due to poor experiencing a decline in Despite affordable options, home to many residents with
public transport. many see Tama as a planned layouts. Neighbourhood Focus: Aging Population:
population and aging temporary stop rather than Some areas are getting older as
Each district has schools, post offices,
demographics. a permanent home. kids move out, leading to
Transportation Backbone: and medical services for a cohesive
1974: Infrastructure Improvement A survey showed only 37% of Trains linked Tama to Tokyo, community feel. challenges like school closures.
Affected New Towns: households planned to stay
Tama Center Station: shifting it from a commuter spot
Examples like Tama New long-term, with feelings to a full-fledged city. Active Engagement:
Opened to reduce traffic congestion, possibly changing over time. Transport Hub:
Town near Tokyo are Roads and trains formed the core, Tama Center Station connects to
Residents take part in local events,
providing connectivity to Shinjuku maintain shared spaces, and push
facing challenges due to connecting neighborhoods and Shinjuku, reducing car reliance;
Station. for better services.
population loss and Urban Fabric: fueling growth. monorail boosts local mobility.
stagnant land markets. Three main types of areas:
1980s: Western Expansion low-rise houses, mid- to Resilient Spirit:
Adaptive Planning: Green Spaces: Despite challenges, the
Issues Faced: high-rise towers, and Tama adjusted plans to fit local
New Districts: densely packed blocks near Parks like Tama Central Park offer community stays strong and works
Population Growth: Aging population, vacant needs, unlike strict ones recreational spots, enhancing the together for a better future.
Ochiai and Tsurumaki the station. elsewhere.
by 1985, reached buildings, and degraded Buildings are arranged along suburban vibe.
(5-11 story apartments, townhouses, It stayed linked to Tokyo's Shinjuku
landscapes are common. streets or face south, with Vibrant Evolution:
row houses, detached houses). Station, showing their close ties.
Job opportunities are few large open spaces. Mixed-Use Areas: Diverse mix of families,
100,000 limited, leading to
Pedestrian Integration:
Tama Center's shops and professionals, and seniors keep
commuting to cities. Population Density: entertainment venues create a lively the town lively and evolving.
Walking paths joined atmosphere.
Tama's density is lower than neighborhoods, making it easier to
New Amenities: Four universities, various
U N IV E R S I TY
Population Shifts: Tokyo's average, with 42 42 people/ get around.
companies, and additional
People are moving from people per hectare.
hectar Special streets improved safety Challenges:
services around Tama
Center Station. remote suburbs to city and made walking more enjoyable. Aging population and outdated
centers, encouraged by Housing Types: infrastructure need modernization;
urban renewal laws. Typical dwellings, like the hilly terrain poses mobility issues.
2000-2006: Final Development Phase Neighborhood Centers:
3DK type, offer about 60 Centers like Tama Center became
Monorail: Began operation in Tama New Town Specifics: square meters of space. hubs for shopping and community Ongoing Improvement:
2000, enhancing intra-town Projected population not Some layouts, like the 1DK, life. Despite challenges, continuous
may feel cramped for They became gathering spots for efforts ensure Tama New Town
mobility. reached, rapid aging, and
families, highlighting space locals and helped the town thrive. remains a desirable and livable
declining school challenges in New Town community.
Project Completion: Officially enrollment. Residents feel living.
isolated, and buildings are Transportation Challenges:
completed in 2006, shifting More cars caused traffic issues,
abandoned.
focus from construction to but solutions were found.
maintenance.