Midterm Exam Curriculum Development Midyear 2024

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Romblon State University

GRADUATE EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL STUDIES


Liwanag, Odiongan, Romblon

MELM 223 Curriculum Development


MIDTERM EXAMINATION
MIDYEAR 2024

Name: _______________________________ SCORE: _______________


Date: JULY 14, 2024
Instructor/Professor: DR. MA. TERESA M. CHICO

ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:

I. Prepare a comparative analysis of two different curriculum models (e.g., Tyler's


Rationale Model vs. Walker’s Deliberative Model). (15 points)
a. Define each model and its components.
b. Explain how each model conceptualizes the role of objectives, content, and
assessment in curriculum development.
c. Provide examples of how these models might influence the design of a
curriculum for any grade school learning area of your choice.

II. Examine the philosophical foundations of the MATATAG curriculum framework


introduced by the Philippine Department of Education. (20 points)
a. Define MATATAG’s key principles and objectives.
b. Identify and explain the educational philosophies (such as Progressivism or
Essentialism) reflected in MATATAG’s framework.
c. Show how MATATAG incorporates elements of these philosophies (e.g.,
learner-centered activities, integration of core subjects).
d. Provide examples from the MATATAG curriculum that illustrate these
philosophical principles (e.g., project-based learning, interdisciplinary
connections).

III. Cite the purpose, mission, vision, goals and objectives of the school where you
belong. Draft your school’s VMGO that align in the MATATAG curriculum principles.
(8 points)

IV. Explain fully the interplay between the teachers, learners and environment which
play a vital role in shaping educational outcomes. (7 points)

Prepared by:

DR. MA. TERESA M. CHICO


Professor
Romblon State University
GRADUATE EDUCATION AND PROFESSIONAL STUDIES
Liwanag, Odiongan, Romblon

SCORING RUBRICS:

Meets Standards Within Standards Approaching Below Standards


INDICATORS Standards

Content Student has an Student has a good Student has some Student doesn’t
Knowledge in-depth and understanding of understanding of the give answer
complete the concept. concept. showing
understanding of understanding of
the concept the concept.
Organization Logically organized, Somewhat digresses Central point and Unorganized and
well structured, from central idea, flow of ideas is lost, vague, no particular
critical thinking ideas do not logically lacks organization flow was followed
evident follow each other’s
Providing All of the examples Most of the examples At least one of the Examples are NOT
examples are specific, relevant are specific, relevant pieces of examples is relevant AND/OR
and explanations and explanations are relevant and has an are not explained.
are given that show given that show how explanation that
how each piece of each piece of show that piece of
evidence supports evidence supports evidence supports
the student’s the student’s position the student’s position
position

You might also like