Participatory Development

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 22

PARTICIPATORY

DEVELOPMENT

LARONA | MACARAIG | OCHOA | PIAMONTE | REVILLA | VALDEZ


PARTICIPATORY
DEVELOPMENT
“Participatory development It seeks the involvement of
is a process through which the locals in different
stakeholders influence and projects of development
2
share control over and believed that such
development initiatives, and participation in the project
over the decisions and led to more successful and
resources that affect sustainable pursuit of the
themselves.” (ADB, 1996) goal.
PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT
THEORY/APPROACH

▹ It has become the dominant approach in all


development initiatives.
▹ This approach allows development initiatives to be 3

able to incorporate local communities as part of the


development process without being dominated.
▹ Allows people and communities to define and
become the subjects of their own development.

“Most manifestations of public participation in development


seek to give the poor a part in initiatives designed for their
benefit” (Cornwall, 2002).
STAKEHOLDERS IN
PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT

GENERAL PUBLIC
4
-who are those affected directly or
indirectly by the project

(i.e. individual and families, women’s


groups, indigenous groups and religious
groups).
STAKEHOLDERS IN
PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT

REPRESENTATIVE ASSEMBLY
5
-elected government bodies

(i.e. national and local assemblies,


district and municipal assemblies,
elected community leaders).
STAKEHOLDERS IN
PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT

DONORS AND INTERNATIONAL


FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 6

-development partners and resource


providers.
STAKEHOLDERS IN
PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT

GOVERNMENT
7
- cabinets and civil servants.

CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS


-includes national NGOs, networks, policy
development and research institutes, media,
community based organizations.
STAKEHOLDERS IN
PARTICIPATORY DEVELOPMENT

PRIVATE SECTOR
8
- umbrella groups representing groups
within the private sector, professional
associations, chambers of commerce
(Reyes, 2014).
PERSPECTIVES OF
PARTICIPATORY
DEVELOPMENT

SOCIAL MOVEMENT
PERSPECTIVE
It refers to participation as the mobilization
of people to get rid of unjust hierarchies,
power, knowledge, and economic
distributions.

10

INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE
Defines participation as the incorporation
and reach of inputs by relevant groups in
the design and implementation of a
development project (Reyes, 2014).

11
Forms/Concepts
of
Participatory
12

Development
PASSIVE PARTICIPATION
The local people participate by making them informed of what
happened or is happening in the project.

PARTICIPATION BY CONSULTATION 13

The local people provides different points and opinion to the


professionals but the decision making will be done only by the
professionals.
PARTICIPATION BY COLLABORATION
The local people together with the professionals provides
different points and opinions and both are involved in the
decision making.
14

EMPOWERMENT PARTICIPATION
The local people have the ownership and power to control the
process and take part of the analysis.
STRENGTHS
- Influencing public policy to provide a check on the power of
government. It also improves the effectiveness, efficiency and
sustainability of development programmes (Reyes, 2014).
- Capacity to improve the match between beneficiaries’ preferences and
the allocation of public goods and benefits.
- Role of the community has given importance as well other stakeholders
involved 15
- Increases local people's interest, awareness and participation which leads
to a supportive relationship among stakeholders involved.
- Applies a variety of methods that can be used flexibly, according to the
situation
- Provides a way of solving some of the problems encountered with the
other approaches
- Poor people’s views are elicited to shape plans and contributed to
development strategies.
WEAKNESSES
- People’s assessment of their condition can be biased
- There may exist different levels of participation
among local people
- Time consuming
- Reflective of existing power relations in a 16

community
- Sample size is too small and not representative
APPLICATION
in FORESTRY
17
DENR - Department Administrative Order
123 (1989)

I. Policies under CBFM DENR - Department Administrative Order


9629 (1996) 18

Republic Act 8371 (1997) Indigenous


People’s Rights Act
II. Upland forestry extension projects
under University of the Philippines Los
Banos (UPLB) Laguna, and Department of 19

Environment and Natural Resources


(DENR) which uses Participatory
Development Approach.
II. Upland forestry extension projects
under University of the Philippines Los
Banos (UPLB) Laguna, and Department of 20

Environment and Natural Resources


(DENR) which uses Participatory
Development Approach.
References:
● Aquino, A. P., & Daquio, C, O. (July 30,2014) CBFM: A National Strategy for Sustainable Forest
Management. Retrieved from http://ap.fftc.agnet.org/ap_db.php?id=280&print=1#_ftn2
● Jabeen, Huraera. (2006). STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF PARTICIPATORY METHODS FOR
RAPID DEFINITION OF PROBLEMS AND POTENTIALS TO PROMOTE SOCIALLY JUST URBAN
INTERVENTION. Retrieved from
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/STRENGTHS-AND-WEAKNESSES-OF-PARTICIPATORY-METH
ODS-Jabeen/bccd8ad5a959b6bdf238b897226d3a904fa85a7f
● Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Washington DC 20433:
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
● Ondrik, Richard S. (n.d.). Participatory Approaches to National Development Planning. Retrieved from
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEASTASIAPACIFIC/Resources/226262-1143156545724/Brief_ADB. 21
pdf
● Reyes, Marijane. (14, September 2014). Participatory Development. Retrieved from
https://www.slideshare.net/marijanereyes/participatory-development?fbclid=IwAR1im5GrSTP_Hq7aiX-b2-_
J9fvTcOWTU8rKseD5DSa90Ii5xlochjq4-Yo
● Mohan, G. & Stokke, K. (2000). Third World Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2: Participatory development and
empowerment: the dangers of localism. pp. 247-249. Retrieved from www.researchgate.net
● Jennings, R. (October 2000). Participatory Development as a New Paradigm: The Transition of
Development Professionalism.
● Tufte, T. & Mefalopulos P. (2009). Participatory Communication: A Practical Guide. Retrieved from
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTDEVCOMMENG/Resources/Participatorycommunication.pdf
● Cornwall, A. (2002). Beneficiary, Consumer, Citizen: Perspectives on Participation for Poverty Reduction.
THANK YOU!
22

You might also like