Oviposición Stenoma
Oviposición Stenoma
Oviposición Stenoma
THE OVIPOSITION BEHAVIOR OF lepidopterans is a complex nis (Curtis) (Plutellidae) (Gupta and Thorsteinson
process that follows a sequence of events. First, mated 1960), can use a polyvinyl plastic surface.
females search for, orient to, and Þnd the host plant. Despite the advances in laboratory insect rearing
These events are difÞcult to evaluate in the laboratory techniques, especially on artiÞcial diet, obtaining eggs
because they involve chemical cues governed by ol- is still one of the most difÞcult obstacles to overcome.
faction and by factors related to vision, such as shape, Therefore, knowledge of oviposition behavior under
size, and color of the substrate (Rausher 1979, Mihs- natural conditions is necessary if techniques or meth-
feldt 1998). In a second step, now on the host, assess- ods that mimic natural conditions are to be used in the
ment of the surface and its suitability for egg laying laboratory. However, many lepidopterans lay their
takes place. Chemical and physical characteristics of eggs on substrates whose surfaces do not resemble the
leaves, fruits, stem, and other plant parts can inßuence natural host either chemically or physically. For ex-
the selection of an egg-laying site (Schultz 1988, ample, oviposition has been obtained on newspaper
Thompson and Pellmyr 1991). At this stage, processes for Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) and Thyrinteina
involved in oviposition often can be determined under
arnobia (Stoll); on parafÞn wax-coated Þlter paper for
laboratory conditions and in the greenhouse. At the
Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner and Diatraea sacchara-
Þnal step, the acceptance or rejection of the oviposi-
lis (F.); on ofÞce paper for Hedylepta indicata (F.)
tion site involves the central nervous system, which
processes the impulses emitted by sensilla located on (Parra 1999); on transparent plastic for Ecdytolopha
different parts of the body: tarsi, antennae, proboscis, aurantiana (Lima) (Garcia 1998); and on transparent
and ovipositor. In addition, the response does not plastic placed over green paper for Bonagota cranaodes
depend solely on characteristics of the plant but also (Meyrick) (Parra et al. 1995), among others. For other
on the presence of insects, pheromones, age of fe- species, it is necessary to add plant parts that possibly
males, and learning (Renwick and Chew 1994). provide some chemical stimulus. Moreti and Parra
In lepidopterans, and particularly in moths, egg lay- (1983) reported that Heliothis virescens (F.) (Noctu-
ing is done on pubescent or rough-surfaced sites that idae) requires cotton leaves in the cage for oviposi-
allow better adhesion of the eggs to the substrate, tion; otherwise, the number of eggs is dramatically
which protects the eggs from predators and parasitoids reduced. Mihsfeldt (1998) tested several treatments
(Callahan 1957, Nitao and Berenbaum 1988). Never- consisting of paper, tomato leaf extract, and green
theless, some microlepidopterans, such as Ethmia spp. plastic for obtaining Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) eggs and
(Ethmiidae) (Peterson 1968) and Plutella maculipen- found that treatments associating an olfactory stimu-
Fig. 1. Papers used as substrate for S. catenifer oviposition. (A) A SNOB two-ply quilted paper towel. (B) A SNOB two-ply
nonquilted paper towel. (C) A 75 g/m2 RIPAX white smooth sulÞte paper.
Eight overlapping paper towel sheets were stacked 0600 hours, with six replicates during 2 d. Eggs on the
between the bench and the base of the cage, corre- paper towel and on the fruit were counted 24 h after
sponding to one sheet for each 2-h interval (Fig. 2F). their removal from the cage because by then the eggs
One fruit was placed inside the cage at the center, had become dark and more conspicuous.
on paper towel sheets, without touching the sides Data Analysis. The experiments were conducted in
(Fig. 2G). The fruit was attached to a string (Fig. 2H) a completely randomized design. To determine a pos-
that was tied to an arm hanging from the iron structure sible chemical stimulus for oviposition, the data for
(Fig. 2I). At evaluation time, the fruit was suspended number of eggs laid on the paper and on the fruit were
a few centimeters on the structureÕs arm, without submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the
removing the screened plastic lid (0.02 mm2) (Fig. 2J). means were compared by the Tukey test (P ⱕ 0.05).
The PVC cage was then moved a few millimeters For determination of a possible physical stimulus, the
vertically to remove a paper towel sheet, correspond- data were analyzed in a 3 by 2 factorial scheme, con-
ing to the egg-laying time interval, while preventing sisting of the three types of paper (quilted, nonquilted,
the adults from escaping. Later, the fruit was replaced and white sulÞte paper) and two oviposition sites
with another fruit through the upper part of the struc- (fruit and paper). Results were submitted to ANOVA,
ture, by partially lifting the screened plastic lid. and the means were compared by the Tukey test (P ⱕ
Treatments consisted of 2-h egg-laying time inter- 0.05). For determination of oviposition time, the data
vals, i.e., 1800 Ð2000 hours, 2000 Ð2200 hours, 2200 Ð were submitted to a second degree polynomial re-
2400 hours, 2400 Ð 0200 hours, 0200 Ð 0400 hours, 0400 Ð gression analysis.
412 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 98, no. 3
Table 1. Mean number (ⴞ SD) of S. catenifer eggs laid on fruit Table 2. Mean number (ⴞ SD) of S. catenifer eggs laid on fruit
and on paper added as lining to the oviposition cage, on avocado and on paper when the cage was lined with different types of paper
fruit Margarida and Breda, and on artificial fruit, as well as on the
cage without fruit No. eggs
Treatment
Fruit Paper
No. eggs
Treatment Quilted paper towel ⫹ fruit 74.00 ⫾ 13.49bB 315.63 ⫾ 34.66aA
Fruit Paper
Nonquilted paper towel ⫹ 184.75 ⫾ 25.00aA 137.63 ⫾ 70.95bA
Margarida fruit ⫹ paper towel 110.85 ⫾ 22.36aB 321.10 ⫾ 60.29aA fruit
Breda fruit ⫹ paper towel 87.51 ⫾ 19.03aB 362.72 ⫾ 66.28aA SulÞte paper ⫹ fruit 248.00 ⫾ 47.21aA 8.88 ⫾ 04.25cB
ArtiÞcial fruit ⫹ paper towel 10.26 ⫾ 03.06b
phase. Approximately 80% of the eggs were laid be- Hohmann, C. L., and A. M. Meneguim. 1993. Observações
tween 2000 and 2400 hours. This egg-laying behavior preliminares sobre a ocorrência da broca do abacate,
is variable among Lepidoptera. Garcia (1998) ob- Stenoma catenifer Wals. no estado do Paraná. Ann. Soc.
served that Ecdytolopha aurantiana (Tortricidae) ovi- Entomol. Bras. 22: 417Ð 419.
posits during the day, and 16.12% of eggs were re- Hohmann, C. L., A. M. Meneguim, E. A., Andrade,
T. C. Novaes, and C. Zandoná. 2003. The avocado fruit
corded from 0700 to 1900 hours. However, the greatest
borer Stenoma catenifer (Wals.) (Lepidoptera: Elachisti-
egg-laying percentage was concentrated from 1900 dae): egg and damage distribution and parasitism. Rev.
to 2300 hours, when 78.96% of eggs were laid. For Bras. Frutic. 23: 432Ð 435.
S. catenifer, no oviposition was observed during the Jackson, D. M., R. F. Severson, A. W. Johnson, and
day, and thus it can be said that its egg-laying habit is G. A. Herzog. 1986. Effects of cuticular duvane diterpe-
crepuscular/nocturnal, because egg laying started at nes from green tobacco leaves on tobacco budworm
1800 hours and ended at dawn by 0800 hours. Al- (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) oviposition. J. Chem. Ecol. 12:
though this study was conducted under laboratory 1349 Ð1359.
conditions, where transitions from day to night (pho- Medina, J. C. 1978. Abacate: da cultura ao processamento e
tophase/scotophase) occurred in an abrupt manner, comercialização. Ital, Campinas, Brasil.
this behavior may be similar to what occurs under Þeld Mihsfeldt, L. H. 1998. Biologia e exigências térmicas de
Tuta absoluta (Meyriek, 1917) em dieta artiÞcial. Ph.D.
conditions.
dissertation, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz deq
Ueiroz, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brasil.
Acknowledgments Moreti, A. C., and J.R.P. Parra. 1983. Biologia comparada e
controle de qualidade de Heliothis virescens (Fabr., 1781)
We thank José Carlos Gonçalves (Café Total Company) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) em dietas naturais e artiÞcial.
for funding this research and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoa- Arq. Inst. Biol. 50: 7Ð15.
mento do Ensino Superior (CapesÐCoordination for the De- Nitao, J. K., and M. R. Berenbaum. 1988. Laboratory rearing
velopment of Higher Education Personnel) for granting a of the parsnip webworm, Depressaria pastinacella (Lep-
doctoral scholarship. idoptera: Oecophoridae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81:
485Ð 487.
Parra, J.R.P., A. E. Eiras, M. L. Haddad, E. Vilela, and
References Cited A. Kovaleski. 1995. Técnica de criação de Phtheochroa
Callahan, P. S. 1957. Oviposition response of the corn ear- cranaodes Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) em dieta
worm to differences in surface texture. J. Kans. Entomol. artiÞcial. Rev. Bras. Biol. 55: 537Ð543.
Soc. 30: 59 Ð 63. Parra, J.R.P. 1999. Técnicas de criação de insetos para pro-
Garcia, M. S. 1998. Bioecologia e potencial de controle bio- gramas de controle biológico. 4⬚ edição. FEALQ, Piraci-
lógico de Ecdytolopha aurantiana (Lima, 1927) (Lepi- caba, Brasil.
doptera: Tortricidae), o bicho-furão-dos-citros, através Peterson, A. 1968. Eggs of moths among the Ethmiidae,
de Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, 1879. Ph.D. disserta- Acrolophidae and HepialidaeÑMicrolepidoptera. Fla.
tion, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz deq Ueiroz, Entomol. 50: 181Ð183.
Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brasil. Ramaswamy, S. B. 1988. Host Þnding by moths: sensory mo-
Gupta, P. D., and A. J. Thorsteinson. 1960. Food plant re- dalities and behaviours. J. Insect Physiol. 34: 235Ð249.
lationships of the diamond-back moth Plutella maculipen- Rausher, M. D. 1979. Larval habitat suitability and ovi-
nis (Curt.): II. Sensory regulation of oviposition of the position preference in three related butterßies. Ecology
adult female. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 3: 305Ð314. 60: 503Ð511.
414 ANNALS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Vol. 98, no. 3
Renwick, J.A.A., and C. D. Radke. 1982. Ovipositional Schultz, J. C. 1988. Many factors inßuence the evolution of
choice and larval survival of the spruce budworm, Cho- herbivore diets, but plant chemistry is central. Ecology 69:
ristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Envi- 896 Ð 897.
ron. Entomol. 11: 503Ð505. Thompson, J. N., and O. Pellmyr. 1991. Evolution of ovipo-
Renwick, J.A.A., and F. S. Chew. 1994. Oviposition behavior sition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera.
in Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 377Ð 400. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36: 65Ð 89.
Städler, E. 1974. Host plant stimuli affecting oviposition of
the eastern spruce budworm. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17:
176 Ð188. Received 6 July 2004; accepted 3 January 2005.