Blending of NR BR EPDM by SIDEWALL
Blending of NR BR EPDM by SIDEWALL
Blending of NR BR EPDM by SIDEWALL
ABSTRACT: EPDM incorporated into blends of natural perties: tensile strength and elongation at break, as com-
rubber/butadiene rubber (NR/BR) improves ozone resist- pared to those prepared by straight mixing, in both gum
ance. In this work, the inferior mechanical properties of and carbon black-filled blends. The increase of tensile
NR/BR/EPDM blends generally obtained by conventional properties in gum and filled reactive blend vulcanizates
straight mixing are overcome by utilizing a reactive pro- does suggest that the reactive processing technique leads
cessing technique. The entire amount of curatives, based to more homogeneous blends due to, either a better cross-
on a commonly employed accelerator N-cyclohexyl-2-ben- link distribution, or more homogeneous filler distribution,
zothiazole sulfenamide (CBS) and sulfur, is first added into or both. Ó 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103:
the EPDM phase. After a thermal pretreatment step tuned 2538–2546, 2007
to the scorch time of the EPDM phase, the modified EPDM
is mixed with premasticated NR/BR. The reactive blend Key words: blends; reactive processing; NR/BR/EPDM;
vulcanizates show a significant improvement in tensile pro- tire sidewall
antiozonant,11 which will not leach out via migration N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazolesulfenamide (CBS) or
like conventional antiozonants do. Several approaches Santocure1 (Flexsys B.V.). High abrasion furnace
have been proposed to overcome the cure rate mis- black (HAF-N330, Cabot Corp.) and naphthenic oil
match and achieve covulcanization,12–24 e.g., by using Sunthene 4240 (Sun Petroleum Products Co.) were
bis(diisopropyl)thiophosphoryl disulfide (DIPDIS) as used to prepare the masterbatches in case of filled
a multifunctional additive, maleic anhydride grafted blends. All elastomers, curatives, and other additives
EPDM as compatibilizer, trans-polyoctylene rubber were used as received.
(TOR) or liquid BR as compatibilizing agents, a two-
stage vulcanization technique or by EPDM-modifica- Preparation of blend compounds
tion through a grafting reaction of accelerators onto by reactive mixing
EPDM. The latter approach is similar to the work re-
ported in this article, but the procedures adopted are The two types of blend compounds described in this
different. work, are designated according to the procedures
Hashimoto et al.17 prepared a modified EPDM in adopted for their preparation: straight mix and reac-
solution to achieve bound 2-mercaptobenzothiazole tive mix. With each of the blend types, gum and car-
EPDM. Baranwal and Son19 modified EPDM by bon black-filled compounds were prepared. The
reacting EPDM with accelerators such as 4,40 -dithio- overall recipes for both gum and filled blends are
bismorpholine (DTBM) and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole given in Table I.
(MBT) in solution in the presence of a photosensi-
tizer and UV light. Hopper20–23 modified EPDM by Gum reactive mix
the addition of certain N-chlorothiosulfonamides to
The entire amounts of curatives and other ingredients
the olefinic sites of EPDM in solution and the melt.
were first incorporated into the EPDM only, using a
Cook24 modified EPDM by mixing sulfur donors like
Brabender Plasticorder 350S mixer having a mixing
dithiodicaprolactam (DTDC) and dithiodimorpholine
chamber volume of 370 cm3. The mixer was operated
(DTDM) with EPDM in an internal mixer at elevated
with a rotor speed of 100 rpm, fill factor of 0.7, and
temperature, resulting in EPDM with bound sulfur
an initial temperature of 508C. The EPDM was first
donor moieties. This was subsequently crossblended
masticated for 1 min, and then ZnO, stearic acid, and
with NR and finally mixed with curatives. Various
TMQ were added. After 2 min of mixing, CBS and
aspects of elastomer blends, including blend charac-
sulfur were added and the mixing was continued for
terization, have been reviewed by Hess et al.25 and
another 2 min. The final compound temperature
Mangaraj.26
before dumping from the mixer was in the range of
In the present work, the first part of a series, it is
115–1208C. Immediately after dumping, the compound
shown how a reactive processing technique, in which
was sheeted on a two-roll mill to a thickness of about
a common N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide
2 mm. The resulting EPDM compound was tested for
(CBS) is grafted onto EPDM prior to blending with
its cure characteristics using a Rubber Process Analyzer
NR/BR, can be utilized to overcome the difficulties
(RPA 2000, Alpha Technologies) at 1408C, 0.833 Hz,
associated with cure incompatibility of NR/BR/
and 0.2 degree strain according to ISO 6502. Scorch
EPDM blends. The efficiency of the reactive process-
time (ts2), i.e., the time to incipient cure, was deter-
ing technique is assessed by the improvement of the
mined and used as a reference point to assign various
mechanical properties of the blend vulcanizates.
pretreatment times of the EPDM, as shown in Figure 1.
EXPERIMENTAL TABLE I
Formulation of NR/BR/EPDM Compounds
Materials
Gum blend Filled blend
The elastomers selected for the blend were natural Ingredient content (phr) content (phr)
rubber (SIR20, Standard Indonesian Rubber), butadi- NR 35 35
ene rubber (Kosyn KBR01, Korea Kumho Petrochem- BR 35 35
ical Co.), and EPDM rubber containing ethylidene EPDM 30 30
norbonene (ENB) as third monomer (Keltan 578z, Zinc oxide 4 4
Stearic acid 2 2
DSM Elastomers B.V., the Netherlands). Keltan 578z
TMQ 1 1
contains 4.5 wt % of ENB and 67 wt % of ethylene. CBS 1.98 (7.5 mmol) 1.98 (7.5 mmol)
The other compound ingredients used were extra Sulfur 2.5 2.5
pure grade zinc oxide (Merck, Germany), finely di- HAF N330 – 50
vided sulfur (Merck), 95% pure stearic acid (Aldrich, Naphthenic oil – 10
Total formulation
Germany), poly (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquino-
weight 111.48 171.48
line) or TMQ (Flexsys B.V., the Netherlands), and
RESULTS
Cure characteristics of the blends
Figure 2 shows a cure curve of a gum reactive mix
prepared by using ts2 2 pretreated EPDM in com-
parison with that of a straight mix, and Figure 3
shows a cure curve of a HAF filled reactive mix pre-
pared by using ts2 þ 1 pretreated MB3 EPDM in
comparison with that of a straight mix. By applying
the reactive processing method, both scorch time
and cure time of the blend are significantly reduced.
Considering the maximum torque levels of the gum
blends, both show more or less equivalent values. Figure 3 RPA cure curves of the reactive mixed 50 phr
However, in the case of filled blends, the reactive HAF-filled NR/BR/EPDM blend, prepared with ts2 þ 1
mix shows a lower maximum torque than the pretreated EPDM, and of a straight mixed filled blend at
straight mix. 1408C.
The cure curves of reactive mixed gum NR/BR/
EPDM blends prepared by using EPDM with differ- than scorch time. The tensile strength shows the
ent pretreatment times are shown in Figure 4. The most pronounced dependence on the EPDM pre-
blends with EPDM of different pretreatment times treatment time. By increasing the pretreatment time,
show a shift of scorch time, cure time, and maxi- the tensile strength of the blend initially increases,
mum torque. A shorter EPDM pretreatment time but dramatically drops as the pretreatment time ap-
gives a longer scorch time and cure time but a some- proaches the EPDM scorch time. By pretreatment of
what lower maximum torque. Plateaus or flat cure the EPDM compound beyond its scorch time, the
curves are observed for the blends. The RPA 2000 blend remains visually heterogeneous during the
rheometer data: minimum torque (FL), maximum blending with NR/BR on the two-roll mill, indicat-
torque (Fmax), torque difference (Fmax FL), scorch ing that the EPDM has lost its ability to be mixed.
time (ts2), and cure time (tc,90) for all blends are In Figure 6, the tensile moduli at 100% and 300%
given in Table III. strain, tensile strength, and elongation at break of
the HAF-filled reactive blends are shown as a func-
tion of EPDM pretreatment times. The EPDM pre-
Tensile properties of the blend vulcanizates
treatment times show no significant effect on the ten-
Figure 5 shows the tensile moduli at 100% and sile moduli. However, the tensile strength and elon-
300%, tensile strength, and elongation at break of gation at break are again influenced by the EPDM
the gum reactive blends, prepared using different pretreatment times. The highest tensile strength and
EPDM pretreatment times relative to scorch time, ts2. elongation at break are observed for an EPDM pre-
The tensile moduli and tensile strength reach their treatment time of scorch plus 1 min (ts2 þ 1). In con-
maximum values at a pretreatment time of scorch trast to the gum blends, in spite of pretreatment of
less 1.5 min (ts2 1.5). The elongation at break remains
more or less the same for pretreatment times shorter
TABLE III
Cure Characteristics of the NR/BR/EPDM Blends
RPA data at 1408C
Type of blend EPDM pretreatment time (min) FL (dN m) Fmax (dN m) Fmax FL (dN m) ts2 (min) tc,90 (min)
Gum straight 0 0.34 4.15 3.81 24.98 40.95
Gum reactive 7.52 (ts2 4) 0.23 3.97 3.74 1.79 7.53
8.52 (ts2 3) 0.23 4.12 3.89 1.51 6.37
9.52 (ts2 2) 0.28 4.26 3.98 0.93 5.21
10.52 (ts2 1) 0.33 4.30 3.97 0.89 5.25
11.52 (ts2) 0.46 4.37 3.91 0.73 5.35
Filled straight 0 0.78 10.06 9.28 3.03 18.82
Filled reactive 3.15 (ts2 2) 0.63 9.03 8.40 1.25 11.16
5.15 (ts2) 0.69 8.94 8.25 1.01 8.61
6.15 (ts2 þ 1) 0.67 8.48 7.81 0.93 7.39
7.15 (ts2 þ 2) 0.61 8.83 8.22 0.57 7.01
the filled EPDM compound beyond scorch time to tively. The energy required to break each sample can
ts2 þ 1 and ts2 þ 2, the blend remained visually ho- be obtained by calculating the area under those
mogeneous during the blending with NR/BR on the curves. The energy to break for the gum reactive
two-roll mill. A visually heterogeneous blend was mix is 2.6 times higher than that of the gum straight
only observed when the ts2 þ 3 pretreatment time mix, and the energy to break for the filled reactive
was used. mix is 2.0 times higher than that of the filled straight
On comparing the tensile stress–strain behaviors mix.
of both gum and filled reactive blends, prepared In Figure 9, the stress–strain curves of the op-
with optimum EPDM pretreatment times, i.e., ts2 1.5 timum gum and filled reactive mixed blends are
for gum and ts2 þ 1 for filled, with those of straight compared. Both gum and filled blends yield similar
mixed blends, the improvement in tensile properties elongation at break. The tensile moduli and tensile
due to the reactive processing technique is clearly strength of the filled blends are increased as a result
visible. Figures 7 and 8 show representative stress– of carbon black reinforcement.
strain curves, a comparison between the straight mix The tensile properties of the straight mixes in com-
and reactive mix, of gum and filled blends respec- parison with those of the reactive mixes are sum-
Figure 5 Moduli at 100% and 300% strain, tensile strength, and elongation at break of gum reactive NR/BR/EPDM
blends, prepared using different EPDM pretreatment times relative to scorch time, ts2.
Figure 6 Moduli at 100% and 300% strain, tensile strength, and elongation at break of 50 phr-HAF filled reactive NR/
BR/EPDM blends, prepared using different EPDM pretreatment times relative to scorch time ts2.
marized in Figure 10. Here, the reactive mixed celerator CBS and sulfur into the EPDM phase and
blends with the highest tensile properties are dem- subsequent thermal pretreatment, and next blending
onstrated. The gum blend was prepared by using an with the premasticated NR/BR, a significant increase
EPDM pretreatment time equal to ts2 1.5, and the in tensile strength and elongation at break is ob-
filled blend was obtained by using the ts2 þ 1 EPDM tained. The moduli at 100% and 300% strain do not
pretreatment time. change very much. The significant improvement in
tensile strength and elongation at break for the reac-
tive blends, does suggest that the ternary blends pre-
DISCUSSION
pared through reactive mixing possess a better cross-
The results in Figures 7–10 have demonstrated that, link distribution and/or carbon black distribution
for NR/BR/EPDM blends, by first premixing the ac- between the three rubber components, as compared
Figure 7 Stress–strain curves of gum NR/BR/EPDM Figure 8 Stress–strain curves of filled NR/BR/EPDM
blends: straight mix versus reactive mix with EPDM pre- blends: straight mix versus reactive mix with EPDM pre-
treatment time ts2 1.5 at 1408C. treatment time ts2 þ 1 at 1408C.
Figure 10 Tensile properties of gum and filled NR/BR/EPDM blends; straight mixes versus reactive mixes. [Color figure
can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
References 16. Chang, Y. W.; Shin, Y. S.; Chun, H.; Nah, C. J Appl Polym Sci
1999, 73, 749.
1. Waddell, W. H. Rubber Chem Technol 1998, 71, 590. 17. Hashimoto, K.; Miura, M.; Takagi, S.; Okamoto, H. Int Polym
2. Ignatz-Hoover, F.; To, B. H.; Datta, R. N.; de Hoog, A. J.; Huntink, Sci Technol 1976, 3, T84.
N. M.; Talma, A. G. Rubber Chem Technol 2003, 76, 747. 18. Suma, N.; Joseph, R.; George, K. E. J Appl Polym Sci 1993, 49,
3. Chapman, A. V.; Tinker, A. J. Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 2003, 549.
56, 533. 19. Baranwal, K. C.; Son, P. N. Rubber Chem Technol 1974, 47,
4. Guillaumond, F. X. Rubber Chem Technol 1976, 49, 105. 88.
5. Hess, W. M.; Scott, C. E.; Callan, J. E. Rubber Chem Technol 20. Hopper, R. J. Rubber Chem Technol 1976, 59, 341.
1967, 40, 371. 21. Hopper, R. J. (to Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.). U.S. Pat.
6. Callan, J. E.; Hess, W. M.; Scott C. E. Rubber Chem Technol 3,970,133 (1976).
1971, 44, 814. 22. Hopper, R. J. (to Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.). U.S. Pat.
7. Sircar, A. K.; Lamond, T. G. Rubber Chem Technol 1973, 46, 178. 4,820,780 (1989).
8. Maiti, S.; De, S. K.; Bhowmick, A. K. Rubber Chem Technol 23. Hopper, R. J. (to Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.). U.S. Pat.
1992, 65, 293. 5,756,590 (1998).
9. Kluppel, M.; Schuster, R. H.; Schaper, J. Rubber Chem Technol 24. Cook, S. In Blends of Natural Rubber: Novel Techniques for
1999, 72, 91. Blending with Speciality Polymers; Tinker, A. J.; Jones, K. P.,
10. van de Ven, P. M.; Noordermeer, J. W. M. Rubber World 2000, Eds.; Chapman and Hall: London, 1998; Chapter 14.
222, 55. 25. Hess, W. M.; Herd, C. R.; Vegvari, P. C. Rubber Chem Technol
11. Doyle, M. J. Presented at the International Tire Exhibition and 1993, 66, 329.
Conference, Akron, Ohio, September 10–12, 1996. 26. Mangaraj, D. Rubber Chem Technol 2002, 75, 365.
12. Shershnev, V. A. Rubber Chem Technol 1982, 55, 537. 27. Morrison, N. J.; Porter, M. In Comprehensive Polymer Science.
13. Ghosh, A. K.; Debnath, S. C.; Naskar, N.; Basu, D. K. J Appl The Synthesis, Characterization, Reactions and Applications of
Polym Sci 2001, 81, 800. Polymers, Vol. 6: Polymer Reactions; Allen, G., Ed.; Pergamon
14. Ghosh, A. K.; Basu, D. K. J Appl Polym Sci 2002, 84, 1001. Press: Oxford, 1989; Chapter 4.
15. van Duin, M.; Krans, J. C. J.; Smedinga, J. Kautsch Gummi 28. Heideman, G.; Datta, R. N.; Noordermeer, J. W. M. Rubber
Kunstst 1993, 46, 445. Chem Technol 2004, 77, 512.
ABSTRACT: Cure incompatibility in NR/BR/EPDM blends ments, attached to the EPDM. NR/BR/EPDM (35/35/30)
is a crucial problem, affecting blend properties. In a previ- ternary blends are prepared by reactive mixing of the pre-
ous study, it was demonstrated that the mechanical proper- treated EPDM with CBS fragments attached with premasti-
ties of such blends can be significantly improved by utiliz- cated NR/BR on a two-roll mill. Their blend morphological
ing a reactive processing technique, in which a pretreated features are studied using the atomic force microscopy
EPDM is first prepared by incorporating all compounding (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micro-
ingredients in the EPDM and subsequent preheating, prior scopic techniques, in comparison with those of blends pre-
to crossblending with premasticated NR/BR. In the present pared by a conventional straight mixing method. Both the
article, the pretreated EPDM-moieties are prepared using tapping mode AFM phase images and TEM micrographs
two different accelerators, N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sul- clearly show that reactive mixing leads to more homogene-
fenamide (CBS) and 6-nitro MBTS. The latter was synthe- ous blends. Ó 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103:
sized and applied for the purpose of IR characterization. 2547–2554, 2007
The infrared (IR) spectra of the pretreated, extracted EPDM
demonstrate absorption peaks associated with the IR Key words: blends; reactive processing; morphology; tire
absorption of the functional groups in the accelerator frag- sidewall; infrared spectroscopy
Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 103, 2547–2554 (2007) The blends consist of the same ingredients as men-
V
C 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. tioned in part I. 6-Nitro-MBTS was prepared using
2548 SAHAKARO ET AL.
RESULTS
6-Nitro-MBTS
Figure 3 shows the IR spectrum of 6-nitro-MBTS in
comparison with that of MBTS. The 6-nitro-MBTS
clearly shows two strong IR absorption bands at
1524 and 1346 cm1 attributed to the characteristic
absorption peaks of aromatic nitro- (N¼ ¼O) com-
pounds,3,4 which normally appear at wavenumbers
1530 6 20 cm1 and 1350 6 30 cm1.
The melting point of 6-nitro-MBTS measured by
using a heating rate of 28C/min from ambient tem-
perature to 3008C (Stuart Scientific melting point ap-
Figure 2 RPA cure curves of the EPDM compounds con- paratus SMP3, England) was in the range of 200–
taining CBS and 6-nitro-MBTS at 1408C with the indication 2058C, whereas that of original MBTS was in the
of the times being used later for the pretreatment. [Color
figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available range of 178–1828C. From the 1H NMR spectra
at www.interscience.wiley.com.] acquired using deuterated chloroform as a solvent,
four different protons in MBTS were observed at 7.4,
and reactive mix. For each of the two blend types, 7.5, 7.8, and 8.0 ppm, whereas three different pro-
gum and carbon black-filled compounds were pre- tons in 6-nitro-MBTS resonate at 8.1, 8.4, and
pared. The overall recipes for both gum and filled 8.7 ppm as a result of the nitro electron withdrawing
blends are given in Table II. group, as shown in Figure 4.
The preparation of the various mixes such as gum
reactive mix, filled reactive mix, gum straight mix,
IR spectra of accelerator-grafted EPDM
and filled straight mix was described in detail in
part I of this series. ATR Fourier-IR spectroscopy was used in this study,
since the pretreated EPDM was only partially solu-
Vulcanization ble in common solvents. Even though the pretreat-
ment step only aimed to attach accelerator fragments
The optimum cure time (tc,90) of the fully com-
to the EPDM, a limited amount of crosslinking in
pounded blends was determined as the time needed
this reactive intermediate was apparently inevitable.
to reach 90% of the maximum torque in the RPA
However, the crosslinking in the pretreated EPDM
2000 at 1408C, 0.833 Hz, and 0.28 strain according to
was still minimal, since the material remained proc-
ISO 6502. The blends were then vulcanized in a
essible when being mixed with NR/BR.
Wickert WLP1600 laboratory compression press at
Figures 5 and 6 show the ATR-IR spectra of sol-
1408C and 100 bar.
vent extracted, pretreated EPDM prepared with CBS
and 6-nitro-MBTS, in comparison with the IR spec-
Atomic force microscopy trum of pure EPDM. The important functional
groups and their assignments are listed in Table III.
Vulcanized samples were prepared for AFM meas-
For pretreated EPDM with CBS, the characteristic
urements by cryo-microtoming the surfaces of the
signal of C¼ ¼N is observed at 1544 cm1. For pre-
samples with a diamond knife at –1508C using a
Leica ultra microtome. The AFM images were ac-
quired using a NanoScope III multimode atomic TABLE II
force microscope (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, Formulation of NR/BR/EPDM Compounds
CA in the Tapping Mode with phase imaging, at Gum blend Filled blend
ambient temperature. Ingredient content (phr) content (phr)
NR 35 35
BR 35 35
Transmission electron microscopy EPDM 30 30
Zinc oxide 4 4
70 nm thin sections of the blend vulcanizates were cry-
Stearic acid 2 2
ogenically cut with a diamond knife using a Leica ultra TMQ 1 1
microtome at 1508C. The sections were deposited on CBS 1.98 (7.5 mmol) 1.98 (7.5 mmol)
a carbon support film on copper grid (200 mesh) and Sulphur 2.5 2.5
then vapor stained using 2% osmium tetroxide for HAF N330 – 50
Naphthenic oil – 10
15 min. TEM measurements were performed with a
Total formulation weight 111.48 171.48
Philips CM 30 transmission electron microscope.
1
Figure 4 H NMR spectrum of 6-nitro-MBTS in comparison with that of original MBTS.
TABLE III
Infrared Absorption Peaks and Their Assignments
Infrared absorption
peak (cm1) Functional group
2925, 2843 CH stretching
1544
C¼¼N stretching
1540, 1401
N¼¼O aromatic nitro
1462, 1378 CH bending (scissoring)
720 CH out-of plane bending
710–570 CS stretching, sulfides (weak)
Figure 6 ATR-IR spectra of pretreated EPDM in comp- Figure 7 Tapping mode AFM phase images of gum NR/
arison with that of pure EPDM in the range of 2000– BR/EPDM blends: straight mix (left) and reactive mix
1200 cm1. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, (right). [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue,
which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.] which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
Figure 9 TEM images of gum NR/BR/EPDM blends: Figure 11 TEM images of 50 phr HAF-filled NR/BR/
straight mix (left) and reactive mix (right) at a magnifica- EPDM blends: straight mix (left) and reactive mix (right)
tion of 10,500. at a magnification of 21,000.
The AFM images of the gum blends in Figure 7 Accelerator-grafted EPDM was prepared under a
show that the dark EPDM phase is less distinct from normal rubber processing condition prior to blend-
the main phase (NR/BR) in the reactive mix, indicat- ing with premasticated NR/BR. The entire amount
of curatives and compounding ingredients was first
incorporated in the EPDM phase, then pretreated at
elevated temperature using a predetermined time
selected based on its scorch time. Extracted, pre-
treated EPDMs prepared using CBS and 6-nitro-
MBTS as the accelerators and characterized by
means of IR spectroscopy clearly show absorption
peaks assigned to the functional groups of grafted
Figure 12 Postulated formation of EPDM-bound interme- accelerator fragments. Both AFM and TEM images
diate by pretreatment of EPDM compound containing CBS. of reactive vulcanizates of gum and filled NR/BR/
EPDM (35/35/30) ternary blends prepared by reac- 5. Niedermeier, W.; Stierstorfer, J.; Kreitmeier, S.; Metz, O.;
tive mixing illustrate a better homogeneity of the Goritz, D. Rubber Chem Technol 1994, 67, 148.
6. Magonov, S. N.; Hwangbo, M. H. Surface Analysis with STM
blends, in comparison with those of straight mixed and AFM; VCH: Weinheim, 1996.
vulcanizates. 7. Galuska, A. A.; Poulter, R. R.; McElrath, K. O. Surf Interface
Anal 1997, 25, 418.
Clemens Padberg and Mark Smithers are acknowledged 8. Haeringen, D. T.-V.; Schönherr, H.; Vancso, G. J.; van der
Does, L.; Noordermeer, J. W. M.; Janssen, P. J. P. Rubber Chem
for help with the AFM and TEM experiments, respectively.
Technol 1999, 72, 862.
9. Jeon, I. H.; Kim, H.; Kim, S. G. Rubber Chem Technol 2003, 76, 1.
References 10. Yerina, N.; Magonov, S. Rubber Chem Technol 2003, 76, 846.
11. Sawyer, L. C.; Grubb, D. T. Polymer Microscopy; Chapman
1. Sahakaro, K.; Naskar, N.; Datta, R. N.; Noordermeer, J. W. M. and Hall: London, 1996.
J Appl Polym Sci 2007, 103, 2538. 12. Kapur, R. S.; Koenig, J. L.; Shelton, J. R. Rubber Chem Technol
2. Talma, A. G. Akzo Nobel, Memorandum RPP9940022; Akzo 1974, 47, 911.
Nobel: Deventer, The Netherlands, 1999. 13. Morrison, N. J.; Porter, M. Rubber Chem Technol 1984, 57, 63.
3. Socrates, G. Infrared and Raman Characteristics Group Fre- 14. Ghosh, P.; Katare, S.; Patkar, P.; Caruthurs, J. M.; Kenkatasubra-
quencies; Wiley: New York, 1994. manian, V.; Walker, K. A. Rubber Chem Technol 2003, 76, 529.
4. Colthup, N. B.; Daly, L. H.; Wiberley, S. E. Introduction to Infra- 15. Heideman, G.; Datta, R. N.; Noordermeer, J. W. M.; van
red and Raman Spectroscopy; Academic Press: Boston, 1990. Baarle, B. Rubber Chem Technol 2004, 77, 512.
ABSTRACT: The NR/BR blend compound formulations parison with those of equivalent conventional NR/BR com-
for tire sidewall applications contain a set of stabilizers added pounds. The reactive NR/BR/EPDM blend vulcanizates
to prevent degradation mainly due to oxygen, ozone, and show excellent tensile strength, elongation at break, tear
heat. 6PPD is the most effective and widely used antiozonant strength, fatigue-to-failure, and ozone resistance in both static
in tire compounds, but is a highly staining material causing a and dynamic conditions. The properties are equivalent or
surface discoloration of the tire sidewall. Incorporation of 30 even superior to those of the conventional NR/BR tire side-
phr EPDM into blends of NR/BR improves the ozone resist- wall compounds. The simple straight mixed NR/BR/EPDM
ance to the required level, without the need of 6PPD. The first blend vulcanizates distinctively possess inferior mechanical
two parts of this series have described a reactive processing properties compared to those of the reactive mix. Ó 2006
technique applied to enhance the covulcanization and blend Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 2555–2563, 2007
homogeneity, together with their characterization. In the pres-
ent article, the properties of the NR/BR/EPDM blends pre- Key words: blends; reactive processing; tire sidewall;
pared by both reactive and straight mixing are tested in com- fatigue resistance; ozone resistance
TABLE I
Compound Formulations
Compound formulation (F1–F8)
Gum HAF filled
Component F1 F2 (straight) F3 (reactive) F4 F5 F6 (straight) F7 (reactive) F8 (reactive)
NR 50 35 35 50 50 35 35 35
BR 50 35 35 50 50 35 35 35
EPDM 0 30 30 0 0 30 30 30
ZnO 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Stearic acid 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
CBS 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98
Sulfur 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
6PPD 2.5 0 0 2.5 0 0 0 0
TMQ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Wax 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0
HAF N330 0 0 0 50 50 50 50 50
Sunthene 4240 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10
Total weight 115.48 112.98 112.98 175.48 172.98 172.98 172.98 170.48
EXPERIMENTAL TABLE II
Dynamic Ozone Test Conditions
Materials Test
The blends consist of the same ingredients as men- Condition 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
tioned in part I. Additional ingredients in the com- Ozone conc. (pphm) 50 6 5 50 6 5 100 6 5 100 6 5
pound formulations for this study are N-(1,3-dimethyl- Elongation (%) 10 20 20 30
butyl)-N0 -phenyl-p-phenylenediamine (Santoflex 6PPD, Temperature (8C) 40 6 2 40 6 2 40 6 2 40 6 2
Flexsys B. V., the Netherlands) and microcrystalline Relative humidity (%) 50 6 5 50 6 5 50 6 5 50 6 5
Frequency (Hz) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
wax (Sunolite 240, Flexsys B. V., the Netherlands). All
Time (h) 72 48 24 72
ingredients were used as received.
Figure 1 EPDM cure curves of gum and 50 phr HAF Fatigue-to-failure test
filled EPDM compounds at 1408C for pretreatment step,
indicating the pretreatment times used. Fatigue-to-failure test was carried out using a Mon-
santo fatigue-to-failure tester as described in ASTM
D 4482-99 at an extension ratio, i.e., the extended
compounds are described in detail in part I of this length of a specimen to the unextended length, of
series. There are two more additional additives added 2.0. A dumbbell test specimen undergoes a tensile-
to the recipes, compared to those recipes given in strain cycle and the number of cycles required to
part I, i.e., 6PPD and microcrystalline wax. For the cause failure, as indicated by complete rupture of the
Brabender mixing of the gum compounds, 6PPD and test specimen, is recorded. In this test, 12 test speci-
wax were added into the compounds together with mens of each sample were tested and the median
ZnO, stearic acid, and TMQ. For the two-roll mill mix- value of the number of cycles required to cause fail-
ing of the filled compounds, stearic acid, ZnO, CBS, ure was recorded.
TMQ, 6PPD, wax, and sulfur were sequentially
added. Static and dynamic ozone test
For reactive mixing, the EPDM compounds with
the entire amounts of curatives and other ingredients Ozone resistance of the blend vulcanizates in both
were first pretreated to a predetermined pretreat- static and dynamic conditions was tested according
ment time related to the scorch time of the EPDM to ISO 1431-1 using an Argentox ozone test cabinet
phase, as described in detail in part I of this series. (Argentox Ozone Technology, Germany).
Based on this previous study, a pretreatment time of For the static ozone test, the test specimens of
scorch time minus 2 min (ts22), and a pretreatment 20 mm in width and 2 mm of thickness, as shown in
time of scorch time plus 1 min (ts2þ1) were selected Figure 2, were clamped, elongated to 20% and tested
for gum and filled blends respectively, as shown in under the following conditions: ozone concentration
Figure 1. The thermal pretreatment of EPDM was car- 50 6 5 pphm; temperature 408C 6 28C; relative
ried out at 1408C in a compression molding machine humidity 50% 6 5% for 168 h.
(Wickert WLP1600 laboratory press) using a tensile For the dynamic ozone test, specimens and test
sheet mold with a thickness of 2 mm. configuration are shown in Figure 2.
The pretreated EPDM compounds of both gum Test specimens are normally clamped at the re-
and filled were finally cross-blended with NR/BR on quired elongation. However, in this case, the speci-
a two-roll mill.
Vulcanization
The optimum cure time (tc,90) of the fully com-
pounded blends was determined as the time needed
to reach 90% of the maximum torque in the RPA
2000 at 1508C, 0.833 Hz, and 0.28 strain according to
ISO 6502. The blends were vulcanized in a compres-
sion press (Fontijne, Holland) at 1508C.
The resulting blend vulcanizates were left condi- Figure 2 Test specimens and test configuration in dynamic
tioning at room temperature for at least 16 h prior to ozone cabinet. [Color figure can be viewed in the online
being tested. issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
TABLE III
Cure Characteristics of the Compounds at 1508C
Compound formulation (F1–F8)
Gum HAF filled
RPA data F1 F2 (straight) F3 (reactive) F4 F5 F6 (straight) F7 (reactive) F8 (reactive)
Min. torque, FL (dN m) 0.26 0.28 0.24 0.61 0.68 0.66 0.58 0.61
Max. torque, Fmax (dN m) 4.23 3.95 3.93 9.21 9.78 9.08 8.28 8.65
FmaxFL (dN m) 3.97 3.66 3.69 8.60 9.10 8.42 7.70 8.04
ts2 (min) 8.45 12.00 1.17 3.85 4.21 2.63 0.73 0.87
tc,90 (min) 14.78 22.06 4.01 8.25 9.09 10.21 4.37 4.67
than the straight NR/BR/EPDM blends. The results standard, this fatigue test implies a rupture failure
are in agreement with those reported in part I of this mechanism that stems from the growth of flaws in
series. the specimen, and fatigue data give primarily an
Figure 8 shows the trouser tear strength of the blend estimation of the crack initiation behavior of a rubber
vulcanizates. Considering the mean tear strength of vulcanizate.
the gum NR/BR and of the reactive NR/BR/EPDM Considering the fatigue-to-failure of the gum blends
blends, both of them show equivalent values, but shown in Figure 9, the NR/BR blend shows a supe-
higher than the straight mixed NR/BR/EPDM blend. rior fatigue life compared to the gum NR/BR/EPDM
In case of the filled blends, the reactive NR/BR/ blends. However, between the gum NR/BR/EPDM
EPDM blend F7 containing TMQ and wax shows the blends, the reactive mix gives a significant improve-
highest value, and the NR/BR/EPDM blends show ment in fatigue life compared to the straight mix. In
a higher tear strength than the NR/BR blends F4 case of the filled blends, by applying the reactive
and F5. On comparing the tear strength of the NR/ processing method, a number of cycles to failure of
BR blends, F4 versus F5, the exclusion of 6PPD the reactive NR/BR/EPDM blend vulcanizate is
apparently has a negative effect on the tear strength observed which is approximately two-fold higher
of the blend vulcanizate. On comparing the NR/BR/ than that of the blend prepared by simple straight
EPDM blends with equivalent ingredient composi- mixing. In addition, the fatigue-to-failure (Kc) of the
tions, F6 versus F7, the tear strength of the reactive filled reactive NR/BR/EPDM blend shows even
NR/BR/EPDM blend is clearly better than that of significantly higher values than the filled NR/BR
the straight mix. The exclusion of antidegradants in blends.
F8 also results in a reduction of tear strength of the
blend vulcanizate.
Static and dynamic ozone resistance
All specimens are free of cracks after the static ozone
Flex-fatigue
test for 168 h at an ozone concentration of 50 pphm,
The cyclical flexing of the test specimens initiates temperature of 408C, and 20% elongation.
cracks and finally leads to complete rupture of the A subsequent series of dynamic ozone tests, car-
test specimens. According to the ASTM D 4482 test ried out consecutively on the same test specimens
Figure 7 Elongation at break of the blend vulcanizates. Figure 9 Fatigue-to-failure of the blend vulcanizates at an
extension ratio of 2.
under the heavier test conditions described in Table II, testing conditions of the 4th test, i.e., 100 pphm ozone
illustrates the resistance to ozone cracking of the concentration and 30% elongation. All the gum blend
NR/BR/EPDM blends in comparison with the con- vulcanizates in Figure 12 show small cracks on the
ventional NR/BR blends with 6PPD as antiozonant. elongated area. However, the test specimens of the
After the 1st and 2nd test, there are no cracks ob- gum NR/BR/EPDM blends rupture completely soon
served on the surface of any test specimens, except after cracks appear, indicating a low cut growth re-
on those of compound F5: NR/BR with no 6PPD. sistance of the NR/BR/EPDM blends compared to
The exclusion of 6PPD from the NR/BR blend clearly the NR/BR blends.
gives no protection of the rubber against ozone attack, Cracks can also be observed on the surface of the
and cracks in a direction perpendicular to the elon- filled blend vulcanizates. Figure 13 shows many
gation are clearly observed, as shown in Figure 10. small cracks on the edge but only a few on the sur-
Figure 10 also clearly shows surface discoloration face of the F4 NR/BR blend with 6PPD. The test
and staining, caused by the use of 6PPD in the F1 specimens of F6, F7, and F8 show a lower number of
and F4 compounds. cracks and better surface appearance. However,
After the 3rd test at 20% elongation and 100 pphm these specimens ruptured soon after the develop-
ozone concentration for 24 h, very small cracks can ment of the cracks, again due to lower cut growth
be seen on the surface of compound F4 through a resistance.
2 magnifying glass, as shown in Figure 11. The F5
vulcanizates are badly damaged. On the other hand,
there are still no cracks visible with 2 magnification DISCUSSION
for the blend vulcanizates of compounds F1, F2, F3,
F6, F7, and F8. Figure 11 also shows a badly stained As has been demonstrated in parts I and II of this
F1 gum NR/BR vulcanizate due to 6PPD, in compar- series, the reactive processing technique significantly
ison with the light colored F2 gum NR/BR/EPDM improves tensile properties and blend morphology
blend vulcanizate. of NR/BR/EPDM blends. This study covers such
Figures 12 and 13 show photographs of the blend blend properties as relevant for tire sidewall applica-
vulcanizates exposed to ozone under the most severe tion, e.g., flex-fatigue and ozone resistance, in direct
comparison with conventional NR/BR sidewall com-
pounds. The cure characteristics of the blends shown
in Table III and Figures 3, 4, reveal a shorter scorch
time and cure time of the reactive NR/BR/EPDM
blends compared to NR/BR and straight mixed NR/
BR/EPDM blends, respectively. This is the result of
the preactivated EPDM as, described in detail in
part II. Irrespective of the somewhat higher maxi-
mum torques of the NR/BR compounds compared
to those of the reactive NR/BR/EPDM blends, both
gum and filled reactive ternary blend vulcanizates of
NR/BR/EPDM yield more or less equivalent tensile
properties: tensile moduli, tensile strength, and elon-
gation at break. The inclusion of 30 phr of EPDM
Figure 8 Trouser tear strength of the blend vulcanizates. into the NR/BR blend by means of the reactive pro-
Figure 10 Photographs of blend vulcanizates of compound F1, F4, and F5 after 2nd test. [Color figure can be viewed in
the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
cessing technique, clearly retains the properties of firming the improvement of crosslink and/or filler
the simple NR/BR blend, as a result of a good cross- distribution among the various rubber phases in the
link distribution between the various rubber phases ternary blend. The primary controlling parameters
and/or a better homogeneous carbon black distribu- affecting the fatigue life are inhomogeneities or flaws
tion in the blends. Simple straight mixed NR/BR/ present in each sample, caused by the blending, mix-
EPDM again results in the poorest tensile properties, ing, curing, and sample cutting.11 The reactive NR/
reproducible with the results reported in part I. BR/EPDM blends show a much better blend homo-
The tear strengths of the gum NR/BR and reactive geneity compared to that of equivalent straight mix,
NR/BR/EPDM blend vulcanizates are equivalent, and hence possess significantly longer fatigue life.
but clearly better than the straight mixed gum NR/ The static ozone test produced no visible cracks in
BR/EPDM. On the other hand, the filled NR/BR/ either compound. The presence of microcrystalline
EPDM blends show higher tear strengths compared wax in the compounds is apparently sufficient to
to the equivalent filled NR/BR blends, and the high- protect the rubber under static conditions due to the
est value is observed for the reactive NR/BR/EPDM formation of a surface film of bloomed wax.3,12
containing TMQ and wax: compound F7. The higher However, under dynamic conditions, the inelastic
tear strength of such reactive NR/BR/EPDM blend wax film breaks and allows ozone to attack. As tire
vulcanizates again must be the result of a better sidewalls are subjected to both static and dynamic
homogeneity of either crosslink distribution or ozone exposures, therefore, an antiozonant for dy-
carbon black distribution or both. The dispersion of namic service condition, e.g., 6PPD, is required.
EPDM particles inside the NR/BR matrix could also From the dynamic ozone test results it is seen, that
impede the tear propagation and hence increases the addition of 30 phr of EPDM into the conven-
tearing energy or tear strength. tional NR/BR blends gives the blends the same good
The superior fatigue-to-failure of the gum NR/BR resistance to ozone cracking in both static and dy-
blends, shown in Figure 9, over the gum NR/BR/ namic conditions as 2.5 phr of 6PPD.
EPDM blends, and also the better fatigue property of The dynamic ozone test results for both gum and
the filled reactive NR/BR/EPDM blends compared filled blends suggest that the 6PPD can be totally
to the NR/BR and the straight mixed NR/BR/EPDM omitted from the compound formulation when re-
blends, are partially due to their lower modulus, as placed by EPDM. The ternary blends show excellent
shown in Figure 5. Considering the NR/BR/EPDM physical appearance because of absence of the stain-
blends only, the reactive mixes do have distinctively ing antiozonant. Considering the ozone resistance of
better fatigue-to-failure than the straight mixes, con- the NR/BR/EPDM blends, the blend vulcanizates
Figure 11 Photographs of blend vulcanizates of compound F1,F2, F4, and F5 after 3rd test. [Color figure can be viewed
in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
Figure 12 Photographs of gum blend vulcanizates during the 4th test, observed after 24, 48, and 72 h ozone exposure.
[Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
Figure 13 Photographs of 50 phr HAF-filled blend vulcanizates during the 4th test, observed after 24, 48, and 72 h
exposure. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at www.interscience.wiley.com.]
obtained by both straight mix and reactive mix show dynamic conditions of the NR/BR/EPDM blend
a similar quality, suggesting that the resistance to vulcanizates with 30 phr of EPDM is excellent and
ozone cracking is only due to the presence of a suffi- 6PPD can totally be omitted from the tire sidewall
cient amount of highly saturated EPDM, irrespective compound. The overall properties of the reactive
of crosslink and/or filler distribution and blend mixed NR/BR/EPDM blends are clearly better than
morphology. The ozone resistance of the F8 NR/BR/ those of the straight mixed NR/BR/EPDM blends,
EPDM blends indicates that both 6PPD and micro- obviously due to the improvement of crosslink and/
crystalline wax can be omitted from the formulation. or carbon black distribution in the blends as seen in
This preliminary laboratory study on the perform- part II, and the reproducibility of the reactive pro-
ance of NR/BR/EPDM blends prepared by using cessing technique.
the reactive processing technique, gives a promising
perspective for application in tire sidewalls. The re-
active processing technique is simple to implement References
and the properties of the ternary blend without 1. Sahakaro, K.; Naskar, N.; Datta, R. N.; Noordermeer, J. W. M.
staining antiozonants are equivalent to those of a J Appl Polym Sci 2007, 103, 2538.
conventional NR/BR tire sidewall compound. 2. Sahakaro, K.; Talma, A. G.; Datta, R. N.; Noordermeer, J. W. M.
J Appl Polym Sci 2007, 103, 2547.
3. Layer, R. W.; Lattimer, R. P. Rubber Chem Technol 1990, 63,
CONCLUSIONS 426.
4. Waddell, W. H. Rubber Chem Technol 1998, 71, 590.
The physical properties of NR/BR/EPDM blend 5. Sandstrom, P. H.; Lal, J. (to Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Co.).
vulcanizates prepared by using the reactive process- U.S. Pat. 4,003,420 (1977).
6. Sandstrom, P. H.; Lal, J. (to Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Co.).
ing technique under optimum conditions, are equiv-
U.S. Pat. 4,004,627 (1977).
alent or even superior to conventional NR/BR tire 7. Van de Ven, P. M.; Noordermeer, J. W. M. Rubber World
sidewall compounds. The tensile strength and elon- 2000, 222, 55.
gation at break of the reactive filled NR/BR/EPDM 8. Doyle, M. J. Presented at the International Tire Exhibition
blends and the NR/BR filled blends are more or less Conference, Akron, Ohio, September 10–12, 1996.
9. Sumner, A. J. M.; Kelbch, S. A. Rubber World 1995, 213, 38.
equivalent. The reactive filled NR/BR/EPDM blends
10. Kim, H. J.; Hamed, G. R. Rubber Chem Technol 2000, 73, 743.
show superior tear strength and fatigue-to-failure to 11. Young, D. G.; Kresge, E. N.; Wallace, A. J. Rubber Chem
those of the equivalent filled NR/BR blend com- Technol 1982, 55, 428.
pound. The ozone resistance under both static and 12. Veith, A. G. Rubber Chem Technol 1972, 45, 293.