001
001
001
www.elsevier.com/locate/polydegstab
Abstract
New formulations of waterborne polyurethanes (wPU) and poly(urethane-urea)s (wPUU) were produced based on hydroxy-ter-
minated polybutadiene (HTPB), poly(propylene glycol) (PPG), dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA), and three different types of
aliphatic diisocyanates—isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), 4,40 -dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (HMDI) and hexamethylene dii-
socyanate (HDI)—and the aromatic tolylene diisocyanate (TDI). Three types of chain extender were used in some of the formula-
tions: ethylene glycol (EG), forming polyurethanes, and hydrazine (HYD) or ethylenediamine (EDA), resulting in poly(urethane-
urea)s. In the formulations, HTPB content and NCO/OH ratio were varied. The thermal stability of the materials, obtained as cast
films prepared from aqueous dispersions was evaluated by thermogravimetry (TG). It was observed that initial degradation tem-
peratures were above 200 C, with two- or three-step degradation profiles. An increase in HTPB content, the presence of urea lin-
kages, and HMDI as diisocyanate in the formulations led to materials with higher thermal stability. DTG curves exhibited stages
not perceptible in the curves of weight loss, which were mainly influenced by the differences in the formulations.
# 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Polyurethanes; Aqueous dispersions; Hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene; TG; DTG
tions. Thermogravimetry (TG) is a suitable method and the water. After the addition of EG, the reactions
widely used to evaluate the thermal properties of these were maintained at 45 C, for 1 h. Finally, water was
materials [3,13]. added, with high speed stirring, and aqueous dispersions
In a previous study, the degradation profile, based on with solids content of 35 2.5% (w/w) obtained.
TG and DTG curves, of polyurethane and poly(urethane- In the polyurethane formulations, the amount of
urea) cast films produced from aqueous dispersions was DMPA was fixed at 60% in equivalent-number of total
discussed. The formulations were based on poly(propylene OH groups (number of OH groups present in the
glycol) (PPG), 4,40 -dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate hydroxylated compounds: DMPA, and the polyols PPG
(HMDI) and dimethylolpropionic acid (DMPA). Fur- and HTPB). The variations performed were: the type of
thermore, three types of chain extender were used: diisocyanate, the HTPB content (from 10 to 50% in
ethylene diamine (EDA) and hydrazine (HYD), forming equivalent-number relative to polyols OH groups), and
poly(urethane-urea)s, and ethylene glycol (EG), produ- NCO/OH prepolymer ratio (2.0 and 3.0), which were
cing polyurethanes [3]. the ratio between the equivalent-numbers of NCO
In this work, degradation profiles of some aqueous groups and total OH groups. It is important to empha-
dispersion-cast films based on hydroxy-terminated size that as the HTPB content increased, the dispersion
polybutadiene (HTPB), PPG, DMPA, and four differ- in water became more difficult, due to both the higher
ent diisocyanates were evaluated. The diisocyanates viscosity of the prepolymer and its non-polar character.
were the aromatic tolylene diisocyanate (TDI) and the Films were obtained by casting the aqueous disper-
aliphatics: isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), 4,40 -dicyclo- sions on leveled polyethylene surfaces and allowing
hexylmethane diisocyanate (HMDI) and hexamethylene them to dry at room temperature, for 7 days, and then
diisocyanate (HDI). In some formulations HYD, EDA at 60 C, for 12 h. The thickness of the films were below
or EG were used as chain extenders. 1 mm. The cast films obtained from the aqueous dis-
persions became more flexible as the HTPB content in
the formulation increased.
2. Experimental
2.3. TG analysis
2.1. Reagents
Thermogravimetric experiments were performed in a
The following reagents were used as received: TA Instruments TG 2950 Analyser. Film samples ran-
dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL), Aldrich; 4,40 -dicyclo- ging from 2 to 6 mg were placed in a platinum sample
hexylmethane diisocyanate (HMDI), Hüls; dimethyl- pan and heated from 25 to 600 C, under N2, at a heat-
olpropionic acid (DMPA), Aldrich; ethylene diamine ing rate of 10 C/min. During the heating period, the
(EDA), Reagen; ethylene glycol (EG), Vetec; hexa- weight loss and temperature difference were recorded as
methylene diisocyanate (HDI), Bayer; hydrazine a function of temperature.
(HYD), 64%, Bayer; hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene
(HTPB) (M n =3500, determined by VPO), Petroflex;
isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), Hüls; poly(propylene 3. Results and discussion
glycol) (PPG), M v =1200, Dow Chemical; tolylene di-
isocyanate (TDI), Bayer; and triethylamine (TEA), Polyurethane chains are composed of flexible seg-
Union Carbide. ments, derived from polyols, and rigid or hard segments
formed by the urethane linkages. Urea linkages may
2.2. Synthesis of aqueous dispersions and films also be present in the rigid segment, leading to the for-
preparation mation of poly(urethane-urea) chains [14].
The thermal stability of these thermoplastic elasto-
The synthesis of the prepolymer based on HTPB, mers is generally not high, specially above their soft-
PPG, DMPA and the diisocyanate, catalyzed by ening temperatures [15], and the degradation
(DBTDL), was carried out in bulk, at 100 C, for 2 h, mechanism is very complex due to the variety of pro-
under N2 atmosphere. The prepolymer neutralization ducts formed in the process [3,16,17]. It was proposed
with TEA was conducted at 50 C, for 1 h. The tem- that the thermal degradation of polyurethane is pri-
perature was reduced to 25 C and the dispersion of the marily a depolycondensation process, which starts at
bulk in water was carried out by high speed agitation. about 250 C [3,18], and presents a bimodal profile. The
NCO-terminated prepolymer chains were reacted with first mode is related to the hard segments, poly(urethane-
EDA or HYD, in a chain extension step, at 35 C, for 1 urea)s being more stable than polyurethanes [19].
h, forming urea groups. The chain extender EG was Usually, at a low heating rate, the degradation process
added before the dispersion, in order to avoid the com- results in differential weight loss (DTG) curves with
petition between the hydroxyl groups of the extender several peaks, which indicates the complexity of the
F.M.B. Coutinho et al. / Polymer Degradation and Stability 81 (2003) 19–27 21
degradation [3,13]. Those peaks correspond to the tem- finally at 208 C, when IPDI was employed. HDI, which
peratures at maximum rate of weight loss in the corre- contains the most flexible portion, –(CH2)6–, seems to
sponding step. facilitate the thermal degradation. On the other hand,
In the present study, the onset degradation tempera- the cyclic structures seem to be more resistant, specially
ture (Tonset) of the monomers, polyurethanes and HMDI, which is more symmetrical than IPDI and,
poly(urethane-urea)s was defined as the initial tempera- consequently, promotes stronger interactions between
ture of degradation, corresponding to the intercept of the chains by hydrogen bonding. This way, the former
the tangent drawn at the inflection point of the decom- imparts higher thermal resistance than the latter.
position step with the horizontal zero-line of the TG Fig. 2 compares the thermal resistance of formula-
curve [3,20,21]. Table 1 shows the TG parameters tions using diisocyanates with the aliphatic structures
obtained for the hydroxyl-terminated monomers. HTPB (HMDI and IPDI) and the aromatic TDI, at same
showed the highest thermal resistance. NCO/OH ratio (2.0), 10% HTPB content, and HYD as
TG curves for some formulations are presented in chain extender. Degradation in three discrete stages
Figs. 1–5 and some corresponding DTG curves are starts at 199 C for TDI, 205 C for IPDI and 208 C
depicted in Figs. 6–8. TG curves show two or three dis- for HMDI. At the beginning of the process, the aro-
crete stages of degradation. In general, the materials matic diisocyanate resulted in polymer chains with
obtained in the absence of HTPB presented a two- lower thermal stability. The aromatic rings, with 2,4- and
degradation-step profile and those synthesized with 2,6-isocyanate groups formed more rigid chains but also
HTPB, three stages, which are clearly distinguished in more asymmetrical, which seems to make the interactions
derivative curves (DTG). between the hard segments difficult, reducing their ther-
It is in the hard segment, composed of urethane lin- mal resistance. However, the presence of TDI seemed to
kages, that the initial thermal decomposition occurs. impart higher thermal stability to the flexible segments,
When urea linkages are present, the thermal stability is compared with the aliphatic structures.
higher, probably because of the higher hydrogen-bond- Figs. 3 and 4 show the influence of HTPB content on
ing capacity of this group when compared with urethane the thermal stability of formulations prepared with
[3,14]. The subsequent stages of degradation correspond HMDI (NCO/OH=2.0) and IPDI (NCO/OH
to the soft segments, formed from polyols [3,15,16]. ratio=3.0), respectively. HYD was the chain extender
Figs. 1 and 2 present the influence of diisocyanate used. The calculated onsets for the beginning of degra-
type on thermal stability for some formulations. Fig. 1 dation process are listed in Table 2. It can be observed
shows the degradation profiles of films obtained from that the presence of a low content of the flexible chain
aqueous dispersions, synthesized with the aliphatics of HTPB in the formulation (10%) did not influence the
HDI, HMDI and IPDI, at same NCO/OH ratio (3.0), thermal stability, comparing with the formulation with-
and in the absence of HTPB. The chain extender out HTPB. On the other hand, for the formulations
employed was HYD. The profiles show two discrete with higher contents of HTPB, the thermal stability was
steps of degradation when HDI is present and three notably improved.
when the cyclic diisocyanates make part of the struc- We also observed higher values for the initial degra-
ture. The first step, corresponding to the rigid segments, dation temperature of HMDI series, in which NCO/OH
begins at 197 C, for HDI, at 202 C, for HMDI and ratio or rigid segment content was lower than in the IPDI
Table 1
TG data obtained for the di-hydroxyl monomers
T1onset ( C)d T2onset ( C)e T1m ( C)f T2m( C)g m1 (%)h m2 (%)i
Fig. 1. TG curves of poly(urethane-urea)s synthesized with different types of aliphatic diisocyanates, HYD as chain extender, in the absence of
HTPB, and at NCO/OH ratio=3.0.
Fig. 2. TG curves of poly(urethane-urea)s synthesized with different aliphatic and aromatic diisocyanates, HYD as chain extender, 10% HTPB, and
at NCO/OH ratio=3.0.
F.M.B. Coutinho et al. / Polymer Degradation and Stability 81 (2003) 19–27 23
Fig. 3. Influence of the amount of HTPB in the degradation profiles of poly(urethane-urea)s materials synthesized with HMDI, HYD as chain
extender, and at NCO/OH ratio=2.0.
Fig. 4. Influence of the amount of HTPB in the degradation profiles of poly(urethane-urea)s materials synthesized with IPDI, HYD as chain
extender, and at NCO/OH ratio=3.0.
24 F.M.B. Coutinho et al. / Polymer Degradation and Stability 81 (2003) 19–27
Fig. 5. Influence of the chain extender type in the degradation profiles of polyurethane and poly(urethane-urea)s synthesized with HDI, at NCO/OH
ratio=3.0, in the absence of HTPB.
Fig. 6. DTG curves of poly(urethane-urea)s synthesized with different aliphatic and aromatic diisocyanates, HYD as chain extender, 10% HTPB,
and at NCO/OH ratio=3.0.
F.M.B. Coutinho et al. / Polymer Degradation and Stability 81 (2003) 19–27 25
Fig. 7. DTG curves of poly(urethane-urea)s materials synthesized with HMDI, HYD as chain extender, at NCO/OH ratio=2.0, employing different
amounts of HTPB.
Fig. 8. DTG curves of polyurethane and poly(urethane-urea)s synhesized with HDI, different chain extenders, at NCO/OH ratio=3.0, in the
absence of HTPB.
26 F.M.B. Coutinho et al. / Polymer Degradation and Stability 81 (2003) 19–27
References [11] Huang S-L, Lai L-Y. J Appl Polym Sci 1995;58:1913.
[12] Huang S-L, Lai J-Y. J Membrane Sci 1995;105:137.
[1] Coutinho FMB, Delpech MC, Garcia MEF. Polym Test 2002; [13] Chang TC, Chiu YS, Chen HB, Ho SY. Polym Degrad Stab
21:719. 1995;47:375.
[2] Coutinho FMB, Delpech MC, Alves LS. J Appl Polym Sci 2001; [14] Hepburn C. Polyurethane elastomers. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier;
80:566. 1991.
[3] Coutinho FMB, Delpech MC. Polym Degrad Stab 2000;70:49. [15] Wang TL, Hsieh TH. Polym Degrad Stab 1997;55:95.
[4] Delpech MC, Coutinho FMB. Polym Test 2000;19:939. [16] Ferguson J, Petrovic Z. Eur Polym J 1976;12:177.
[5] Shao CH, Huang JJ, Chen GN, Yeh JT, Chen KN. Polym [17] Grassie, N., Scott, G. Polymer degradation and stabilisation
Degrad Stab 1999;65:359. England: Cambridge University Press; 1985. p. 41.
[6] Coutinho FMB, Delpech MC, Moura PMQ, Mello SDS. Polym [18] Grassie N, Zulfiqar M. J Polym Sci 1978;16:1563.
Bull 1996;37:1. [19] Bhattacharyya J. In: Cheremisinoff NP, editor. Physical chemical
[7] Coutinho FMB, Delpech MC. Polym Test 1996;15:103. crosslinking of polyurethane, vol. 2: handbook of polymer
[8] Satguru R, McMahon J, Padget JC, Coogan RG. J Coat Technol science and technology. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1989. p. 578.
1994;66(830):47. [20] Nakamura K, Hatakeyama T, Hatakeyama H. Polym Adv
[9] Scharpman F, Couvercelle JP, Bunel C. Polymer 1998;39(4):965. Technol 1992;3:151.
[10] Haska SB, Bayramli E, Pekel F, Özkar S. J Appl Polym Sci 1997; [21] Hatakeyama H, Izuta Y, Kobashigawa K, Hirose S, Hatakeyama
64:2347. T. Macromol Symp 1998;130:127.