Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Rubric OOP 2nd Sem SY 2022 2023

    Uploaded by

    jadeoabalos

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Rubric OOP 2nd Sem SY 2022 2023

    Uploaded by

    jadeoabalos
    6 views3 pages

    Original Title

    Rubric-OOP-2nd-Sem-SY-2022-2023

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    6 views3 pages

    Rubric OOP 2nd Sem SY 2022 2023

    Uploaded by

    jadeoabalos

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    RUBRIC ON OBJECT - ORIENTED PROGRAMMING

    Course: COMP 212: Object-Oriented Programming Semester: 1st Semester, S.Y. 2023-2024

    LO: CLO1: Discuss the concept and principles object- Instructor: Loren Rose A. Abad
    oriented programming.
    CLO2: Plan, design, develop and debug object–
    oriented computer program.
    CLO3: Formulate problems as steps so as to be
    solved systematically.
    CLO4: Develop software in team-work integrating
    robustness, reusability and portability.
    Topic: Chapter V: Swing Components Class Schedule: Monday and Wednesday
    Chapter VI: GUI Development BSIT II – 1 9:30 – 12:00 AM
    BSIT II – 2 1:00 – 3:30 PM
    BSIT II – 3 3:30 – 4: 30 PM
    Tuesday and Thursday
    BSIT II – 3 3:30 – 5:00 PM
    Activity Create a program using Java programming language. Its goal is to demonstrate what you have learned in this subject.
    Description: The program will be evaluated using the following criteria.

    PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
    OBJECTIVE/
    WEIGHT Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory SCORE
    CRITERIA
    100% 85% 70% <55%
    - Completed between 86- - Completed between 71- - Completed between - Completed less than
    100% of the requirements. 85% of the requirements. 56-70% of the requirements. 56% of the requirements.
    Delivery 20%
    - Delivered on time, and in - Delivered on time, and in - Delivered on time, and in - Not delivered on time or
    correct format. correct format. correct format. not in correct format.

    ESSU-ACAD-500 | Version 4 Page 1 of 3


    Effectivity Date: June 10, 2021
    - Includes name, and title. - Includes name, and title. - Includes name, and title. - No name or title
    included
    Coding Standards 20% - Excellent use of white space. - Good use of white space. - White space makes
    program fairly easy to read. - Poor use of white space
    - Creatively organized work. - Organized work. (indentation, blank lines).
    - Organized work.
    - Excellent use of variables (no - Good use of variables (no - Disorganized and
    global variables, unambiguous global variables, - Good use of variables (few messy
    naming). unambiguous naming) global variables,
    unambiguous naming). - Poor use of variables
    (many global variables,
    ambiguous naming).
    - Program produces correct - Program produces correct - Program approaches - Does not execute due
    answers or appropriate results answers or appropriate correct answers or to errors.
    Runtime 20% for all inputs tested. results for most inputs. appropriate results for most
    inputs, but can contain - User prompts are
    - Thorough and organized - Thorough testing has been miscalculations in some misleading or non-
    testing has been completed completed cases. existent.
    and output from test cases is
    included. - User prompts contain little - No testing has been
    information, poor design. completed.
    - Solution is efficient, easy to - Solution is efficient and - A logical solution that is - A difficult and inefficient
    Efficiency 15% understand, and maintain. easy to follow (i.e. no easy to follow but it is not the solution.
    confusing tricks). most efficient.
    - The project shows great - The project shows certain - The student uses ideas - He/she uses the ideas
    15% originality. All figures and originality. from other people but there is of other
    Originality ideas were self-made. little evidence of the original classmates/people.
    ideas.
    - Project was received on or - Project was one (1) day - Project was two (2) days - Project was three (3) or
    Timeliness 10% before the deadline. late. late. more days late.

    Total 100% Final Rating

    ESSU-ACAD-500 | Version 4 Page 2 of 3


    Effectivity Date: June 10, 2021
    Computation of Grades:

    Name of Student: Year and Section:

    Prepared by: Noted:

    LOREN ROSE A. ABAD, MIT HERSHEY R. ALBURO, DIT


    Instructor I Head, BSIT Program

    Approved:

    ENGR. RENATO A. PADULLO, E.E.


    College Dean, CCS

    ESSU-ACAD-500 | Version 4 Page 3 of 3


    Effectivity Date: June 10, 2021

    You might also like