Cambridge IGCSE ™: First Language English 0500/12
Cambridge IGCSE ™: First Language English 0500/12
Cambridge IGCSE ™: First Language English 0500/12
com
Cambridge IGCSE™
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report f or
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes f or the February/March 2024 series f or most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alon gside the
specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond
the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assess ed by the
question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level
descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however , the use of the full mark range may
be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or
grade descriptors in mind.
^ partially effective Y Y Y Y Y
credited point, detail or choice Y (point Y (point awarded) Y (relevant choice) Y (supporting detail from the
from text awarded) text)
DEV development Y
EXP explanation/meaning Y
O overview or Y Y
organisation (effective organisation (overview)
/ overview)
LM lifted material Y Y
REP repetition Y Y Y
summative comment Y Y Y
- Reading Reading Reading
- Writing Writing
-
SEEN viewed – including blank and Y Y Y
- additional pages
-
Question 1
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R5 (25 marks):
and Question 1(f) only tests writing assessment objectives W2 and W3 (5 marks):
1(a) R5 1
1(b)(i) R1 2
1(b)(ii) R2 2
1(c) R1 2
1(e) R1 and R2 3
Total 30
1(b)(i) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: 2
‘animal inhabitants’ (line 2).
1(b)(ii) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: 2
‘fantastic take’ (line 4).
• strange / remarkable / bizarre / imaginary / unexpected / extraordinary / amazing / incredible / unrealistic / weird /
unbelievable / unlikely / implausible / marvellous / wonderful
• version / interpretation / (distinct) treatment / variation / perspective / adaptation / view(point) / opinion
• Tarzan
• Romulus / Remus / founder(s) of Rome
• show human traits (allow: social traits / show empathy / show kindness)
• closest (living evolutionary cousins) to humans
• adopt other (orphan) chimps
• instinctive adoption most often the case / more likely to adopt one of own species / humans have very different DNA to
animals / animals want to pass on (their/similar) DNA to next generation
• humans look very different to animals / humans look alien to animals
• human (babies) take a lot of resources / human child unlikely to be able to contribute usefully to animal’s life
• no verified evidence
Answers which are entirely in the words of the text should not be credited.
1(f) According to Text B, why is the wolf not well understood by some people? 15
You must use continuous writing (not note form) and use your own words as far as possible.
Up to 10 marks are available for the content of your answer and up to 5 marks for the quality of your writing.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 1(f) (Table A, Reading and Table B Writing).
5 9–10 • A very effective response that demonstrates a thorough understanding of the requirements of the task.
• Demonstrates understanding of a wide range of relevant ideas and is consistently well-focused.
• Points are skilfully selected to demonstrate an overview.
4 7–8 • An effective response that demonstrates a competent understanding of the requirements of the task.
• Demonstrates understanding of a good range of relevant ideas and is mostly focused.
• Points are carefully selected and there is some evidence of an overview.
3 5–6 • A partially effective response that demonstrates a reasonable understanding of the requirements of the task.
• Demonstrates understanding of ideas with occasional loss of focus.
• Some evidence of selection of relevant ideas but may include excess material.
2 3–4 • A basic response that demonstrates some understanding of the requirements of the task.
• Demonstrates general understanding of some relevant ideas and is sometimes focused.
• There may be some indiscriminate selection of ideas.
0 0 • No creditable content.
3 4–5 • A relevant response that is expressed clearly, fluently and mostly with concision.
• The response is well organised.
• The response is in the candidate’s own words (where appropriate), using a range of well-chosen vocabulary which clarifies
meaning.
2 3–2 • A relevant response that is generally expressed clearly, with some evidence of concision.
• There may be some lapses in organisation.
• The response is mainly expressed in the candidate’s own words (where appropriate) but there may be reliance on the words
of the text.
0 0 • No creditable content.
Question 2
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R4 (25 marks):
2(a)(i) R1 1
2(a)(ii) R1 1
2(a)(iii) R1 1
2(a)(iv) R2 1
2(b)(i) R2 1
2(b)(ii) R2 1
2(b)(iii) R1 1
Total 25
2(a)(i) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as the words underlined: 1
When the writer first arrives at Aurora Park, he waits outside a small wooden building which has no lights on.
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the correct answer.
2(a)(ii) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as the words underlined: 1
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the correct answer.
2(a)(iii) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as the words underlined: 1
• (are) accustomed to (human) contact (and enjoy our company) (line 23)
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the correct answer.
2(a)(iv) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as the words underlined: 1
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the correct answer.
2(b)(i) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the words underlined: 1
I extinguish the car lights and step out into the freezing air just as a snowplough comes up the road, driven by my
‘devoted host’ and ‘wildlife expert’, Head Keeper, Stig Hansen.
‘Follow me in your car,’ Stig says softly. ‘At the top, when we get out, don’t make sudden
movements or noises.’
2(b)(ii) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the words underlined: 1
• host: person receiving guests / someone looking after (visitors) / person in charge (of your stay) / organiser (of stay)
2(b)(iii) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the words underlined: 1
2(c) Use one example from the text below to explain how the website makes Aurora Park sound appealing. 3
I check the park’s website on my phone: ‘Experience Arctic nature up close. Live amongst our rare semi-wild
wolves at the ultra-exclusive Wolf Lodge. Revel in the unique feeling of being watched by curious amber eyes; be
part of a new story for these marvellous, mythical, misunderstood creatures …’
Award 3 marks for an appropriate example with a comprehensive explanation which shows understanding of how the
website makes Aurora Park sound appealing.
Award 2 marks for an appropriate example and attempt at an explanation which shows some understanding of how the website
makes Aurora Park sound appealing.
Award 1 mark for an example with an attempt at an explanation which shows awareness of the appeal of Aurora Park. The
explanation may be partial.
Explain how the writer uses language to convey meaning and to create effect in these paragraphs. Choose three
examples of words or phrases from each paragraph to support your answer. Your choices should include the use of
imagery.
The following notes are a guide to what good responses might say about the selections.
Candidates can make any sensible comment, but only credit those that are relevant to the correct meanings of the words in
the context and that have some validity. Alternative acceptable explanations should be credited. Credit comments on effects
created by non-vocabulary choices such as grammar / syntax and punctuation devices. These must be additional to
comments on vocabulary.
Paragraph 9 begins ‘From inside …’ and is about the first evening in the lodge
Overview: juxtaposition of the extraordinary sights in the night sky with the latent threat of the wolves observed from the
safety and comfort of the lodge
• plush (mountain lodge): comfortable, expensively appointed, suggests soft/furry toy or material, expect to be cosseted;
warm and welcoming
• peer out: look out tentatively / try to see out; difficulty seeing out into the dark; slightly nervous
• a green glow: at first just smudges that grow: faint suggestion of light initially; otherworldly, becoming more intense;
life of its own; indistinct marks at the beginnings of a picture that become a work of art
• (forming a) cosmic phantom: taking shape; ghostlike / in outer space; alien character; ethereal; unknown, unsettling
power; awe-inspiring
• flutters, swirls and moves mysteriously (across the vast sky): light, organic motion, suggests natural force/power
reminiscent of water/wind
• Surfacing from the depths of the darkness: coming up, emerging, as if from below an ocean; monster of the deep;
menacing
• sudden, vicious, wolf-fight: brutal, shocking physical encounter, surprise
• eerie silence: no one is talking; unnatural quiet; nervous, listening out, waiting for the next noise
• gazing at a shimmering white moon: staring at the moon; as if entranced; sparkling; precious, pearl-like iridescence
• silhouetted against it, are the swift shadows of running wolves : outline of the creature against the moon;
stereotypical image; horror movies; otherworldly connection between mysterious power of moon and the beasts
Only credit comments on stylistic effect where these are explicitly linked to choices.
2(d) Paragraph 10 begins ‘Next morning …’ and is about meeting the wolves.
Overview: endearing appeal contrasted with their wild, unpredictable nature and capacity for aggression
• emboldened by a hearty breakfast: ready to face the wolves; enjoyed a delicious and satisfying meal; feeling braver
now he has eaten a good breakfast; amusing; childlike
• venture out: dare to go out; showing some courage; sense of anticipation to explore
• (wolf pack) loping eagerly (towards us): awkward; gangly, jaunty movement; dog-like; friendly
• (They) jump up excitedly: ebullient welcome; keen to greet them
• (a) snarling stand-off: growling at each other; competitive; apparently aggressive contest, though fighting over who gets
to say hello first
• agree (to lick my camera instead): resolve the argument, as if they have discussed it; compromise suggested
• (it’s all) remarkably non-threatening: surprisingly amicable; not what was expected, pleasant anti-climax
• stroll: slow, casual walk; enjoyable and relaxed
• a bit of a howl and hold a wrestling contest: make typical wolf noise and play fight; understated, as if children
playing; perceived/presented as light-hearted entertainment
• instantly curious and pushy: sudden change; alert and insistent; unexpected; potentially overwhelming
• flooded with predatory instincts (and the power of the pack): sudden deluge of natural urges; nature takes over;
instinctive behaviour of the group; natural hunters; primeval
• retreat to a respectful distance: stepping away; recognising the potential danger in these creatures; acknowledging
their power; not presuming to understand or be part of the pack
• Cute they may be, but cuddly toys they are not: contrast between physical appeal and their wild nature; mocking
childish interpretation; emphasis on ‘not’ suggests potentially dire consequences for anyone trying to cuddle a real wolf.
Only credit comments on stylistic effect where these are explicitly linked to choices.
5 13–15 • Wide-ranging discussion of judiciously selected language with some high-quality comments that add meaning and
associations to words/phrases in both parts of the text and demonstrate the writer’s reasons for using them.
• Tackles imagery with some precision and imagination.
• There is clear evidence that the candidate understands how language works.
2 4–6 • The response provides a mixture of appropriate choices and words that communicate less well.
• The response may correctly identify linguistic devices but not explain why they are used.
• Explanations may be few, general, slight or only partially effective.
• They may repeat the language of the original or do not refer to specific words.
Question 3
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R3 (15 marks):
3 You are Stig Hansen. You have been invited to give a talk about Aurora Park and your work there. 25
• what your job involves and the skills and qualities you feel you need to do the job well
• what visitors enjoy about Aurora Park and the security measures you have in place
• why the work you and your team are doing at Aurora Park is important for both wolves and humans.
Base your talk on what you have read in Text C, but be careful to use your own words. Address each of the three
bullet points.
Up to 15 marks are available for the content of your answer and up to 10 marks for the quality of your writing.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 3 (Table A, Reading and Table B Writing)
Candidates should select ideas from the text (see below) and develop them relevantly, supporting what they write with
details from the text. Look for an appropriate register for the genre, and a clear and balanced response which covers the
three areas of the question, is well sequenced, and is in the candidate’s own words.
Annotate A1 for references to what your job involves and the skills and qualities you feel you need to do the job well.
Annotate A2 for references to what visitors enjoy about Aurora Park and the security measures you have in place.
Annotate A3 for references to why the work you and your team are doing at Aurora Park is important for both wolves and
humans.
3 A1: what your job involves and the skills and qualities you feel you need to do the job well
• looking after the park’s animals (det. head keeper) [dev. organising team / managing]
• looking after the visitors to Wolf Lodge (det. meet them at reception, show to accommodation, cook) [dev. ensure
guests are comfortable / need to be prepared to pitch in to any job]
• clearing the snow (det. driving a snowplough) [dev. regular, heavy falls of snow / necessary to avoid being cut off /
physical endurance required to withstand weather conditions]
• calm (det. talk softly, no sudden noise or movements) [dev. need to reassure visitors / show visitors how to behave]
• expert knowledge (det. monitor wolves, different calls) [dev. confident around wolves]
A2: what visitors enjoy about Aurora Park and the security measures you have in place
• overnight accommodation (det. Wolf Lodge) [dev. extremely comfortable / luxurious / welcoming first impression]
• scenery / view (det. aurora, Northern lights) [dev. impressive / panoramic views out of the window]
• meeting wolves (det. semi-wild; licking; have to be 18+) [dev. always accompanied by a keeper / extraordinary /
exciting]
• food (det. dinner, hearty breakfast) [dev. traditional / cooked over fire]
• tunnel (det.in the hillside) [dev. only way for visitors to enter / wolves do not have access]
• wire fence / gate (det. electrified, leave cars outside) [dev. keeping wolves in / keeping unwanted visitors out]
A3: why the work you and your team are doing at Aurora Park is important for both wolves and humans.
• wolves are misunderstood (det. part of a new story) [dev. changing perception of the animals]
• accustoming wolves to humans (det. captivity is stressful for many wolves, better welfare in captivity) [dev. help both
species to coexist happily / protecting their wolves in the valley]
• environmental benefits (det. we don't interfere, biodiversity) [dev. allowed to live naturally / part of what should be
there / redressing the balance]
• increasing numbers (det. rare, were once on the brink of extinction) [dev. attracting other wolves]
• encourage more visitors (det. charge for meeting wolves) [dev. protecting their future as a species / brings in revenue /
publicity for the cause]
Table A, Reading
Use the following table to give a mark out of 15 for Reading.
5 13–15 • The response reveals a thorough evaluation and analysis of the text.
• Developed ideas are sustained and well related to the text.
• A wide range of ideas is applied.
• There is supporting detail throughout, which is well integrated into the response, contributing to a strong sense of purpose
and approach.
• All three bullets are well covered.
• A consistent and convincing voice is used.
4 10–12 • The response demonstrates a competent reading of the text with some evidence of basic evaluation or analysis.
• A good range of ideas is evident.
• Some ideas are developed but the ability to sustain them may not be consistent.
• There is frequent, helpful supporting detail, contributing to a clear sense of purpose.
• All three bullets are covered.
• An appropriate voice is used.
2 4–6 • There is some evidence of general understanding of the main ideas, although the response may be thin or in places lack
focus on the text or the question.
• Some brief, straightforward reference to the text is made.
• There may be some reliance on lifting from the text.
• One of the bullets may not be addressed.
• The voice might be inappropriate.
1 1–3 • The response is either very general, with little reference to the text, or a reproduction of sections of the original.
• Content is either insubstantial or unselective.
• There is little realisation of the need to modify material from the text.
3 5–6 • Language is clear but comparatively plain and/or factual, expressing little opinion.
• Ideas are rarely extended, but explanations are adequate.
• Some sections are quite well sequenced but there may be flaws in structure.
2 3–4 • There may be some awkwardness of expression and some inconsistency of style.
• Language is too limited to express shades of meaning.
• There is structural weakness and there may be some copying from the text.