1 s2.0 S1043661823003961 Main
1 s2.0 S1043661823003961 Main
1 s2.0 S1043661823003961 Main
Pharmacological Research
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yphrs
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor and semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor
GLP-1RA agonist, have both demonstrated efficacy in glycemic control, reducing blood pressure, body weight, risk of renal
SGLT2-I and heart failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this observational, real-world, study we aimed to investigate the
T2D
efficacy of the combination therapy with those two agents over glycemic control. We thus obtained the data of
Dual treatment
1335 patients with type 2 diabetes followed by 11 Diabetes centers in Lombardia, Italy. A group of 443 patients
Combination therapy
was treated with dapagliflozin alone, the other group of 892 patients was treated with the combination therapy
of dapagliflozin plus oral semaglutide. We analyzed changes in glycated hemoglobin from baseline to 6 months of
follow-up, as well as changes in fasting glycemia, body weight, body mass index, systolic and diastolic pressure,
heart rate, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria. Both groups of patients showed an
improvement of glycometabolic control after 6 months of treatment; indeed, the treatment with dapagliflozin
plus oral semaglutide showed a reduction of glycated hemoglobin of 1.2% as compared to the 0.5% reduction
observed in the dapagliflozin alone group. Significant changes were observed in body mass index, fasting
plasmatic glucose, blood pressure, total cholesterol, LDL and albumin to creatinine ratio, with a high rate (55%)
of near-normalization of glycated hemoglobin. Our real world data confirmed the potential of the oral combi
nation therapy dapagliflozin with semaglutide in inducing pharmacological remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
This article is authored by a Consulting Editor. According to our policy the article has been handled by another editor independently, with the author being blind
☆
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2023.107040
Received 9 November 2023; Received in revised form 10 December 2023; Accepted 11 December 2023
Available online 20 December 2023
1043-6618/© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
M.E. Lunati et al. Pharmacological Research 199 (2024) 107040
2
M.E. Lunati et al. Pharmacological Research 199 (2024) 107040
In the group of patients treated with dapagliflozin plus oral semaglutide, 3.4. Renal function
basal insulin was suspended in the 89.2% of subjects, rapid insulin in
100% and there was a decrease in the use of sulfonylureas/glinides in Regarding renal function, at follow up serum creatinine remained
the 98.2% of patients. Regarding the use of antihypertensive medica stable in the dapa group with a slightly improvement in the dapa+sema
tions, it remained stable in the 93.9% of patients treated with dapagli group (Table 1) and albumin to creatinine ratio was improved in both
flozin and in the 97.4% treated with dapagliflozin plus oral semaglutide, treatment groups (Figs. 1D and 1H; Fig. 2D). Albumin creatinine ratio
while reduction was obtained, respectively, in the 9.9% and 4.3% of improved at a greater extent in the dapa group (Fig. 2D). Finally, we
subjects. evaluated changes in the KDIGO risk classes, considering the whole
population of patients. The statistically significant reduction in albu
minuria, shown by our data together with the stability of eGFR values,
3.3. Glycometabolic control permitted an improvement in the overall KDIGO class of risk at follow-
up (Fig.3 Suppl. Online). Comparing KDIGO class of risk from baseline to
Glycometabolic parameters variation in the two subgroups during follow-up, the group of patients at low risk increased by 5%, while the
follow-up are reported in Table 1. As shown, in both groups there was a group of patients at moderate and high risk decreased by nearly 6%
significant improvement in all metabolic parameters, blood pressure and (Fig. 3 Suppl. online).
lipidic profile. Fasting plasmatic glucose, glycated hemoglobin and body
mass index were all improved in both treatment groups during follow-up 4. Discussion
(Figs. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1E, 1F and 1G; Figs. 2A, B, C and E). As expected, a
greater a reduction of Hb1Ac was observed in the dapa+sema group, This study investigates the effects of combination of SGLT2is and
while being improved in the dapa group only. Body mass index, fasting GLP-1RAs in a real-world population of patients with type 2 diabetes.
plasmatic glucose and glycated hemoglobin all improved at a greater Interestingly, in the dapagliflozin plus oral semaglutide group we
extent in the dapa+sema group (Fig. 2 A, B and C). A significant observed a mean reduction of HbA1c levels, from baseline after 6
reduction in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, with a slight increase months of treatment, of − 1.2%, as compared to the − 0.5% reduction
in HDL cholesterol, was observed in both groups, while triglycerides observed in the group treated with dapagliflozin only. This result is
were significantly reduced in the dapa group only. The achievement of consistent with the very few studies employing combined SGLT2i and
HbA1c < 6.5%, suggesting a pharmacological remission of type 2 dia GLP1-RA, although using a different combination as compared to our
betes, was obtained in 22.7% (94/415) of subjects in the dapa group and study [18–20]. As known, the two molecules act on glucose metabolism
in 51.8% (282/544) of patients in the dapa+sema group (Fig. 2E). We in a very different manners; indeed, GLP-1RAs reduce glycemia by
then compared the baseline characteristics of patients achieving enhancing insulin secretion and decreasing glucagon release, also
HbA1c< 6.5% (“responders”) as compared to (“non responders”) in delaying gastric emptying, reducing hepatic glucose production and
dapa+sema group. “Responders” were significantly younger with a whole body insulin sensitivity, while SGLT2is provide increased glucose
shorter diabetes duration. Comparing their baselines, they were char excretion by renal proximal tubule [18]. By contrast, they share a
acterized by a better glycometabolic state and higher body weight glucose-dependent mechanism of action, with very low hypoglycemia
values (Table 2). A logistical binary regression was performed to risk, together with a sustained weight loss through different mechanisms
determine the major contributors to the obtainment of HbA1c values [21]. These combination therapy increase cardiovascular and renal
lower than 6.5% considering the whole population and the two different benefits [22–24]. The results of this study seem to confirm that combi
subgroups of patients. Considering the whole population, a better gly nation treatment with SGLT2i and GLP-1RA can lead to clinical benefits
cemic control and renal function at baseline and the use of dual therapy on glycemic control, systolic blood pressure, body weight and dyslipi
(OR 4.9, 95% CI 2.794–8.531, p < 0.0001) were related to demia. Moreover, a recent meta-analysis, involving 1895 patients with
HbA1c< 6.5% at follow-up (Fig. 2 Suppl. online). By contrast, age, sex type 2 diabetes enrolled in 8 randomized clinical trials, confirmed that
and years of disease were not significantly related. Considering the two combination therapy led to a much more significant reduction in gly
subgroups, the major determinant to HbA1c< 6.5% resulted, for both, a cemic levels [25], allowing additional HbA1c reduction of − 0.7%,
better glycemic control at baseline.
Table 1
Glycometabolic parameters of patients that completed the 6 months follow-up.
Dapa (n = 415) Dapa+Sema (n = 544)
Basal Follow up Mean reduction P value Basal Follow-up Mean reduction P value
BMI (Kg/m2) 28.4 ± 4.4 27.5 ± 4.4 -0.9 0.001 28.6 ± 3.3 27.1 ± 3.0 -1.5 0.001
Weight (Kg) 79.6 ± 14.1 77.1 ± 13.9 -2.5 0.001 80.4 ± 13.5 76.2 ± 12.1 -4.2 0.001
FPG (mg/dL) 152.7 ± 35.8 136 ± 24.6 -16.7 0.001 177 ± 30.8 145.1 ± 19.5 -31.9 0.001
HbA1c (%) 7.4 ± 0.9 6.9 ± 0.7 -0.5 0.001 7.6 ± 0.7 6.4 ± 0.45 -1.2 0.001
S-Creatinine (mg/dL) 1.0 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.3 + 0.06 Ns 0.94 ± 0.19 0.91 ± 0.17 -0.03 0.001
eGFR (mL/min/1,73 m2) 72.8 ± 23.5 72.4 ± 37.5 -0.4 Ns 76.2 ± 24 75.1 ± 20.1 -1.1 ns
ACR (mg/g) 52.7 ± 157 31.7 ± 54.9 -21.0 0.001 66.2 ± 160 50.9 ± 111 -15.3 0.01
Tot-cholesterol (mg/dL) 166.4 ± 37.4 159.7 ± 32.0 -6.7 0.001 188 ± 31.7 172.5 ± 19.5 -15.5 0.001
HDL (mg/dL) 47.5 ± 12.3 47.8 ± 11.6 + 0.3 ns 42.9 ± 8.4 44.1 ± 7.1 + 1.2 0.01
LDL (mg/dL) 95.0 ± 35.1 84.0 ± 23.2 -6.5 0.001 116.4 ± 35.3 97.8 ± 25.3 -18.6 0.01
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 145.3 ± 65.1 135.0 ± 53.2 -10.3 0.000 142.8 ± 47.3 150.7 ± 29.7 + 7.9 0.001
SBP (mmHg) 134.1 ± 14.7 129.0 ± 12.0 -5.1 0.000 133.5 ± 13 123 ± 9,4 -10.5 0.001
DBP (mmHg) 80.1 ± 9.0 77.0 ± 8.4 -3.1 ns 80.7 ± 8.8 73.3 ± 8.3 -7.4 0.001
Basal Insulin treatment 68, 16.4 53, 12.7 -22 0.001 120, 22.1 13, 2.4 -89.2 0.001
Rapid Insulin 37, 8.9 25, 6.0 -32.4 0.001 5, 0.9 0, 0.0 -100 0.001
treatment
Sulfonylureas/glinides treatment 38, 9.1 7, 1.6 -81.6 0.014 55, 1.0 1, 0.2 -98.2 0.001
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; FPG, Fasting Plasma Glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; eGFR Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; ACR, albumin/
creatinine ratio; HDL high density lipoprotein; LDL low density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure. T-test for repeated measures.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n, %.
3
M.E. Lunati et al. Pharmacological Research 199 (2024) 107040
Fig. 1. Values of FPG – A, HbA1c - B, BMI - C and ACR - D at baseline and after 6 months of follow up in Dapa group; values of FPG - E, HbA1c - F, BMI - G and ACR -
H at baseline and after 6 months of follow up in Dapa+Sema group. Abbreviations: FPG, Fasting Plasma Glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; BMI, body mass index;
ACR albumin/creatinine ratio. T-test for unpaired measures. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Fig. 2. Mean reduction in: A - FPG, B - HbA1c, C - BMI and D - ACR after 6 months of follow up according to the treatment groups. E - Distribution of HbA1c (%)
values at baseline (green line) and after 6 months of treatment (blue line) in the 2 groups. The dark violet area represents the area under the curve of patients within
the range of pharmacological remission. Abbreviations: FPG, Fasting Plasma Glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; BMI, body mass index; ACR albumin/creatinine
ratio. T-test for unpaired measures. Data are expressed as mean ± SE. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the
web version of this article.)
compared to monotherapy treatment. In particular, combination ther effects, available data are not consistent; indeed, in some studies, the
apy provides a better control in postprandial glucose levels and allows combination regimen seems to be effective only in reducing systolic
greater body weight reduction [25]. Interestingly, in our population we blood pressure [31], whereas in others, a reduction in both systolic and
observed a higher mean reduction of body mass index (− 0.6 kg/m2) and diastolic blood pressure was observed [32,33]. When evaluating the
body weight (− 1.7 kg) in the combination regimen as compared to changes in the KDIGO risk classes during follow-up, a reduction in the
monotherapy group. These values are slightly higher compared to the risk of renal function decline was observed, with an increased in the
data presents in literature [26]. A partial explanation may be related to number of patients at very low risk. We observed no synergistic effect on
short time of follow up. In fact, both SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs can directly the kidney function with the association with dapa+sema. This could be
reduce body weight with particular effectiveness [14–16,27–30]; the explained by different hypothesis: the benefit on the kidney function is
first increasing energy loss and the second inhibiting energy intake and mainly guaranteed by SGLT2i alone, on the other hand, with a longer
inducing thermogenesis of brown adipose tissue. These effects are syn period of observation, it might be demonstrated also the positive effect
ergistic although they may decrease over time. In our study we have also of the add-on semaglutide treatment. Multiple events, including hemo
found a significant reduction of LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol dynamic changes, reduction of blood pressure, improvement of cardiac
levels and a mild increase in HDL, suggesting a potential role of this metabolism are responsible of the observed positive effects on renal
combination in type 2 diabetes patients with dyslipidemia. Indeed, these function; furthermore, the demonstrated anti-inflammatory, anti-
data are in line with a recent meta-analysis, that reported a significant atherosclerotic and anti-oxidative properties, may protect the kidney
reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (− 23.4 mmol/L) among [23,34–36]. Both SGLT2is and GLP1-RAs play a role in mediating
patients treated with combination regimen, even if the effect on TG, TC anti-infiammatory and immunological effects. Both receptors are indeed
and HDL levels was not significant [25]. Concerning blood pressure expressed in different sub-types of cells involved in immune response
4
M.E. Lunati et al. Pharmacological Research 199 (2024) 107040
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; FPG, Fasting Plasma Glucose; HbA1c,
glycated hemoglobin; eGFR Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; ACR albu
Declaration of Competing Interest
min/creatinine ratio; HDL high density lipoprotein; Data are expressed as mean
± SD or %. None.
(lymphocytes T and B, macrophages, iNTK cells, eosinophils and neu Data availability
trophils for GLP1-RAs and monocytes for SGLT2is) and have demon
strated to reduce inflammatory cytokines production during clinical Data will be made available on request.
trials. [23,35] In our study, the use of combination therapy with dapa
gliflozin plus oral semaglutide lead to the suspension of basal and rapid Acknowledgements
insulin in one third of patients and a superb reduction in sulfonylur
eas/glinides use in almost all patients. Considering that with combina We are grateful to Fondazione Romeo and Enrica Invernizzi for the
tion treatment the risk of hypoglycemia is very low, the use of this amazing and unconditional support.
regimen can be useful in the more fragile classes of patients, such as
elderly [37,38]. It is noteworthy that more than half of the treated pa Appendix
tients in the dapa+sema group achieved a HbA1c levels < 6.5%. Even if
the presence of active pharmacological treatment cannot allow a full Other participants to the study: Andrea Laurenzi, Annalisa Creanza,
definition of diabetes remission, which requires the absence of usual Antonio Luigi Belviso, Baldassarre Grassa, Bernadetta Pasquino, Chiara
glucose-lowering pharmacotherapy for at least three months [39], the Mauri, Cristiana Scaranna, Cristina Mascadri, Danila Marta Camozzi;
achievement of HbA1c goal of less than 6.5% in such a proportion of Elena Cimino, Elena Mion, Emanuela Zarra, Enrico Pigni, Erika Pedone,
patients can reasonably permit us to highlight this result as a "pharma Fabrizio Guerci, Francesca Pesenti, Giacomo Sturniolo, Giorgio Ragni,
cological remission". In fact, is well known that the obtainment of a Giosuè Ghilardi, Giulia Massari, Laura Menicatti, Luca Zenoni, Maria
sustained glycemic control over time, without a significant increase in claudia Tusi, Maria Elena Malighetti, Mario Buizza, Paolo Erpoli, Raf
hypoglycemia risk, is associated with reduced odds of the faella Radin, Roberto Pollastri, Roberta Serra, Rosalia Bellante, Valeria
diabetes-related complications of cardiovascular disease, metabolic Brami.
disease, neuropathy, nephropathy, and peripheral vascular disease [40].
This was probably facilitated by few characteristics at baseline, Appendix A. Supporting information
including age and duration, suggesting that in order to maximize the
clinical results, this treatment should be offered to younger patients and Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the
early in the natural history of the disease. The beneficial role of the online version at doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2023.107040.
intensive diabetes management during the earliest stages of the disease
is particularly important due to the legacy effect. In fact, intensive References
diabetes management in the early stages of the disease translates into
[1] S.I. Taylor, Z.S. Yazdi, A.L. Beitelshees, Pharmacological treatment of
long-term risk reduction over all diabetes-related complication and hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, J. Clin. Investig. 131 (2021), e142243.
death from any causes. [41,42] Interestingly, the binary regression [2] L.-L. Lim, E. Chow, J.C.N. Chan, Cardiorenal diseases in type 2 diabetes mellitus:
analysis confirmed that the major factors contributing to achieve levels clinical trials and real-world practice, Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 19 (2023) 151–163.
[3] A.B. van der Aart-van der Beek, R.A. de Boer, H.J.L. Heerspink, Kidney and heart
of HbA1c < 6.5% were better glycemic control and better renal function
failure outcomes associated with SGLT2 inhibitor use, Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 18 (2022)
at baseline, being the use of combination therapy the most important 294–306.
determinant. In conclusion, our real-world study suggests that the [4] A. Winiarska, M. Knysak, K. Nabrdalik, J. Gumprecht, T. Stompór, Inflammation
and oxidative stress in diabetic kidney disease: the Targets for SGLT2 inhibitors
combination of dapagliflozin plus oral semaglutide induces optimal
and GLP-1 receptor agonists, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021) 10822.
glycemic control, weight loss, amelioration of lipid profile and kidney [5] A.K. Wright, et al., Primary prevention of cardiovascular and heart failure events
protection. The main limitations of the present study are the short time with SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and their Combination in type 2
of follow up and absence of randomization at baseline. Even if further diabetes, Diabetes Care 45 (2022) 909–918.
[6] E. Longato, et al., Cardiovascular outcomes of type 2 diabetic patients treated with
research is needed, we suggest that the combination regimen of dapa SGLT-2 inhibitors versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in real-life, BMJ Open Diabetes
gliflozin plus oral semaglutide may induce type 2 diabetes pharmaco Res. Care 8 (2020), e001451.
logical remission in clinical practice in more than 50% of patients. [7] C.-T. Yang, C.-Y. Yang, H.-T. Ou, S. Kuo, Comparative cardiovascular safety of GLP-
1 receptor agonists versus other glucose-lowering agents in real-world patients
5
M.E. Lunati et al. Pharmacological Research 199 (2024) 107040
with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide population-based cohort study, Cardiovasc. [26] A.M. Ali, et al., Combination therapy with canagliflozin plus liraglutide exerts
Diabetol. 19 (2020) 83. additive effect on weight loss, but not on HbA1c, in patients with type 2 diabetes,
[8] J.-M. Petit, B. Vergès, GLP-1 receptor agonists in NAFLD, Diabetes Metab. 43 Diabetes Care 43 (2020) 1234–1241.
(2017) 2S28–2S33. [27] H. Deol, L. Lekkakou, A.K. Viswanath, J.M. Pappachan, Combination therapy with
[9] H.J.L. Heerspink, et al., Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease, GLP-1 analogues and SGLT-2 inhibitors in the management of diabesity: the real
N. Engl. J. Med. 383 (2020) 1436–1446. world experience, Endocrine 55 (2017) 173–178.
[10] E. Lazzaroni, et al., Dapagliflozin acutely improves kidney function in type 2 [28] J. Harreiter, et al., Combined exenatide and dapagliflozin has no additive effects on
diabetes mellitus. The PRECARE study, Pharmacol. Res. 183 (2022), 106374. reduction of hepatocellular lipids despite better glycaemic control in patients with
[11] C.C. Berra, et al., Real world effectiveness of subcutaneous semaglutide in type 2 type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with metformin: EXENDA, a 24–week, prospective,
diabetes: a retrospective, cohort study (Sema-MiDiab01), Front. Endocrinol. 13 randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial, Diabetes Obes. Metab. 23 (2021)
(2023) 1099451. 1129–1139.
[12] M. Husain, et al., Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with [29] S.A. Jabbour, et al., Efficacy and safety over 2 years of exenatide plus dapagliflozin
type 2 diabetes, N. Engl. J. Med. 381 (2019) 841–851. in the DURATION-8 study: a multicenter, double-blind, phase 3, randomized
[13] S.A. Jabbour, et al., Effects of exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin, exenatide controlled trial, Diabetes Care 43 (2020) 2528–2536.
once weekly, or dapagliflozin, added to metformin monotherapy, on body weight, [30] S.A. Jabbour, et al., Safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin
systolic blood pressure, and triglycerides in patients with type 2 diabetes in the once daily versus exenatide or dapagliflozin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes
DURATION-8 study, Diabetes Obes. Metab. 20 (2018) 1515–1519. inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: 52-week results of the
[14] L. Blonde, et al., Liraglutide as add-on to sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 DURATION-8 randomized controlled trial, Diabetes Care 41 (2018) 2136–2146.
inhibitors in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: LIRA- [31] J.J. Gorgojo-Martínez, C. Serrano-Moreno, A. Sanz-Velasco, G. Feo-Ortega,
ADD2SGLT2i, a 26–week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, F. Almodóvar-Ruiz, Real-world effectiveness and safety of dapagliflozin therapy
Diabetes Obes. Metab. 22 (2020) 929–937. added to a GLP1 receptor agonist in patients with type 2 diabetes, Nutr. Metab.
[15] B. Zinman, et al., Semaglutide once weekly as add-on to SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy Cardiovasc. Dis. 27 (2017) 129–137.
in type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 9): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial, Lancet [32] H.S. Kim, W.J. Lee, Clinical efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor
Diabetes Endocrinol. 7 (2019) 356–367. and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist combination therapy in type 2
[16] B. Ludvik, et al., Dulaglutide as add-on therapy to SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with diabetes mellitus: real-world study (Diabetes Metab J 2022;46: 658-62), Diabetes
inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (AWARD-10): a 24-week, randomised, Metab. J. 46 (2022) 665–666.
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 6 (2018) [33] R.M. Saroka, M.P. Kane, R.S. Busch, Jay Watsky, R.A. Hamilton, SGLT-2 inhibitor
370–381. therapy added to GLP-1 agonist therapy in the management of T2DM, Endocr.
[17] C. Berra, et al., Blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus with arterial Pract. 21 (2015) 1315–1322.
hypertension. The important ancillary role of SGLT2-inhibitors and GLP1-receptor [34] O. Díaz-Trastoy, et al., GLP1 receptor agonist and SGLT2 inhibitor combination: an
agonists, Pharmacol. Res. 160 (2020), 105052. effective approach in real-world clinical practice, Clin. Ther. 42 (2020) e1–e12.
[18] J.E. Anderson, Combining glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and [35] G. Bendotti, et al., The anti-inflammatory and immunological properties of GLP-1
sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors to target multiple organ defects in type Receptor Agonists, Pharmacol. Res. 182 (2022), 106320.
2 diabetes, Diabetes Spectr. 33 (2020) 165–174. [36] A. Sforza, et al., Liraglutide preserves CD34+ stem cells from dysfunction Induced
[19] R.A. DeFronzo, Combination therapy with GLP-1 receptor agonist and SGLT2 by high glucose exposure, Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 21 (2022) 51.
inhibitor: DEFRONZO, Diabetes Obes. Metab. 19 (2017) 1353–1362. [37] J.P. Frías, et al., Exenatide once weekly plus dapagliflozin once daily versus
[20] P. Gourdy, P. Darmon, F. Dievart, J.-M. Halimi, B. Guerci, Combining glucagon-like exenatide or dapagliflozin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately
peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 controlled with metformin monotherapy (DURATION-8): a 28 week, multicentre,
inhibitors (SGLT2is) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), Cardiovasc. double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 4
Diabetol. 22 (2023) 79. (2016) 1004–1016.
[21] E. Lazzaroni, et al., Anti-diabetic drugs and weight loss in patients with type 2 [38] M.E. Lunati, et al., SGLT2-inhibitors are effective and safe in the elderly: The SOLD
diabetes, Pharmacol. Res. 171 (2021), 105782. study, Pharmacol. Res. 183 (2022), 106396.
[22] I.H. de Boer, et al., Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus [39] M.C. Riddle, et al., Consensus report: definition and interpretation of remission in
report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving type 2 diabetes, Diabetes Care 44 (2021) 2438–2444.
Global Outcomes (KDIGO), Diabetes Care 45 (2022) 3075–3090. [40] E. Astorri, P. Fiorina, G. Gavaruzzi, A. Astorri, G. Magnati, Left Ventricular
[23] G. Bendotti, et al., The anti-inflammatory and immunological properties of SGLT-2 Function in Insulin-Dependent and in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetic patients:
inhibitors, J. Endocrinol. Investig. (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-023- radionuclide assessment, Cardiology 88 (2008) 152–155.
02162-9. [41] J. Chalmers, M.E. Cooper, UKPDS and the Legacy Effect, N. Engl. J. Med. 359
[24] F. Folli, et al., Mechanisms of action of incretin receptor based dual- and tri- (2008) 1618–1620.
agonists in pancreatic islets, Am. J. Physiol. -Endocrinol. Metab. (2023), https:// [42] N. Laiteerapong, et al., The legacy effect in type 2 diabetes: impact of early
doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00236.2023. glycemic control on future complications (the diabetes & aging study), Diabetes
[25] C. Li, J. Luo, M. Jiang, K. Wang, The efficacy and safety of the combination therapy Care 42 (2019) 416–426.
with GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a
systematic review and meta-analysis, Front. Pharmacol. 13 (2022), 838277.