UNITED VOICE ARTISTS AI Guidelines
UNITED VOICE ARTISTS AI Guidelines
UNITED VOICE ARTISTS AI Guidelines
Table of contents
Preamble
I General Contractual Principles
II AI Creation
III AI Usage Compensation
IV Fee Transparency and Clarity
V Further Contractual Guidance
It is the belief of United Voice Artists and its member groups that any work relying on
human connections and emotions should be voiced by human voices. It is our belief that only
humans are able to translate feelings into words and form deep connections with the
audience and listeners. Artificial intelligence (AI) does not understand nor can it replicate the
nuances needed to authentically execute this task.
However, UVA acknowledges that the development of synthetic voices in combination with
AI is unstoppable and therefore needs to be evaluated, guided, and properly valued in order
to give all involved parties a unified basis of calculation and protection against misuse.
The technical ability to create and use AI and synthetic voices has developed at an ever
increasing pace – while artists’ rights are often overlooked. Primarily in Europe the GDPR,
personality rights, copyright, claims for remuneration, liability, etc. protect the artists and
their work while in other countries legal protections vary from non-existent to limited.
In a worst case scenario AI voice technology poses the danger of a complete loss of market
value and self-determination over one's own voice. Therefore, UVA strongly warns all voice
artists worldwide to carefully and diligently review all contracts, in particular with a view to
the use and application of AI in relation to the work performed.
The following guidelines and recommendations are designed to help all participating parties
worldwide (e.g. artists, agents, clients, licensors, licensees, brands, lawyers and lawmakers)
to determine contractual agreements and adequate remuneration for speech projects
involving AI. This document should serve as a guidance for fair negotiations.
Marketplace Principle
To avoid price dumping through low wage standards in international markets, the voice
artist must at minimum be compensated by the wage standards of the country of
publication / usage.
The Neural Learning Fee (II. A.) and the Compensation For Creating Training Material (II. B.)
should be thought of as single payments, whereas the Listing Fee (II. C.) should be thought
of as a recurring (monthly) payment.
These fees however only compensate for the artist’s input into the AI system, studio work or
listing of digital voice services. They do not clear any usage rights! Usage must always be
compensated additionally.
II. A.
Neural Learning Fee
For feeding the artist’s ‘voice identity’ or ‘voice print’ into the provider’s neural system (e.g.
Open AI, Eleven Labs etc.), the voice artist must be compensated with a so-called “Neural
Learning Fee” no matter if pre-recorded material is used or the voice artist invests extra
studio time.
By supplying professional, high quality voice samples, the neural system experiences a
general learning process which can never be withdrawn once inserted, even if the specific
character parameters of one’s voice are erased. This learning experience feeds on the ‘voice
identity’ of a voice artist (professional expertise, craft, tone, timing, breathing, pressure,
character, experience of life, humor, charm, lovability, personality, etc.) and extends the idea
of “just learning to imitate” a specific sound of a voice. Therefore the Neural Learning Fee
has to compensate for this plethora of knowledge and the potential long-term loss of
income for the artist.
When determining the amount of the Neural Learning Fee one should take into account at
least one year’s income.
II. C.
Listing Fee
Selling or Reselling of Digital Voice Replicas
Eventually, evolving markets might list digital voice replicas (i.e. recording studios, voice
databases) to offer their AI services without the active participation of the original voice
artist. Such digital voice replicas must be authorized by the respective artists and separately
compensated prior to their voice being listed.
In such cases a so-called “Listing Fee” must be agreed to, which authorizes the licensee to
display the digital replica of the artist’s voice and offer their services. The rights to the digital
replica shall remain at all times with the original voice artist. The Listing Fee does not
include any usage rights. All usage needs to be negotiated and licensed separately from the
listing or training.
The set up of a Listing Fee must always be accompanied by a contract that specifies all
details of the collaboration, the usage fees, and strict transparency agreements concerning
the monitoring of the created outputs of a voice.
The artist who provides their voice for a digital replica retains the rights to it and should be
compensated based on the extent of the digital replica's use.
Most countries currently have established fee structures for usage rights and those rights
continue to apply to AI and synthetically created voices and digital replicas.
Given the broad spectrum of requests, ranging from advertising and system / object voices
to audiobooks and beyond, it is crucial to thoroughly understand and apply the General
Contractual Principles outlined in Section I to determine fair compensation for usage.
If a digital replica's quality sufficiently meets a client's needs to represent their brand,
product, content, or output using this AI-generated voice, then there is no justification for
compensating the original artist differently.
With the use of AI, fee structures and fee components become more complex. Therefore, it is
of importance to agree and govern any fee structure and its components very specifically
and clearly in contracts to enable the highest level of transparency for all parties.
Depending on the agreement between the voice artists and its clients and the scope of
services to be provided by voice artists, the following fee components shall be considered
and specifically determined in contracts:
Neural Learning Fee Compensation for extraction of the artist’s One time fee.
(II.A.) ‘voice identity’ or ‘voice print’ to the provider’s
neural system (e.g. Open AI, Eleven Labs etc.).
Usage Compensation Compensation for the extent of the digital voice Individual.
(III.) replica's use.
In order to ensure the same understanding of compensation and its calculation, attaching
sample calculations, potentially for different scenarios as well, in contract annexes may be
helpful to ensure alignment.
The fee components in these guidelines are suggestions and recommendations of important
aspects to consider from our experience in the past and possible future use cases, but are
not meant to be complete and do not substitute any legal advice on the terms of the
proposed contract. Additional fees and compensation components may be justified,
depending on an individual case by case basis.
V. A.
Legal Aspects
Data Protection
The licensee must ensure that the personal data of the voice actor is protected and the voice
actor properly informed. In the EU, data protection is strictly regulated by the General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR). Aside from clear information as indicated in I. (General
Contractual Principles) the data required for the voice replication and the resulting
information must not be transferred or processed outside of the EU at any time. This means
that the servers on which the AI is hosted and the servers on which the algorithm is located
and the replica is processed should be located in the EU to ensure adequate protection.
Jurisdiction
The jurisdiction stated in the contract must be the voice artist’s country of residence.
V. B.
Contractual Aspects
Exclusivity
Exclusivity must be defined precisely. Any form of exclusivity must be taken into account in
the fee, which may well be in the 6-figure range.
Prohibition of naming
In some markets, the right for the voice artist to be named is guaranteed. If it is contractually
agreed upon that the artist will not be named, the loss of value to the artist must be
compensated. This can be estimated at up to 100% of the original fee.
Specific Products/Programs
The contract should specify exactly for which product, program, platform, character, territory,
time period and language the digital replica may be used and to what extent it is made
available to users. Partially unrestricted use can also be agreed upon. However, a clear
definition is necessary to appropriately determine remuneration and usage rights.
Transparency Principle
NDAs should only be temporary and never be used to undermine standards.
NDAs must never be signed carelessly. They silence the artist and limit their ability to
identify and prosecute unfair business conduct and share their particular circumstances with
the community, the public and the press.
DIsclaimer:
These guidelines and recommendations should not be assumed as exhaustive and may be amended from time
to time as legislation regarding database transparency, labeling and traceability is still in development and may
vary in different countries (i.e. the EU AI Act vs laws in the US). Because the application of rules may vary
depending on a voice actor‘s jurisdiction and applicable law, it is recommended to seek legal assistance and to
verify the standards that may have been adopted through the work of local unions and associations