Final Term Exam Professional Ethics II PHD
Final Term Exam Professional Ethics II PHD
Final Term Exam Professional Ethics II PHD
Note: Students have to attach question paper along with answer sheet.
Subjective Part
Discuss the justifications for and against the use of deception, and propose
Answer
In research deception is an act of hiding or omitting the information about the aspects of the
conducting study. By nature, it is unethical practice to deceive the participant in order to get
them participate in the particular study, i.e., in Tuskegee Syphilis experiment participants are
unaware about the nature of the experiment. Deception in research basically violates the rule
of informed consent as participants and these violations hindered the ability of participant to
make Decision to participate in the study. Honesty and integrity are a major principle of the
ethical consideration of any profession but the studies in which deception is used have lack of
transparency which can lead to the potential harm to the participants as when they mislead,
betrayed about the true nature of the research. It can cause harm emotionally and
psychologically and sometimes physically also. Sometime deception may compromise the
fidelity and credibility of the research’s work. Researchers are striving to benefit with whom
they work and take care to do no harm but the deception demoralize the basic principles of
the ethics. Beyond the ethical violations, sometimes deception be considered necessary for
many research objectives. For example, to ensure the validity of the research findings as if
participants are aware that they are being observed in particular behavior than they will be
conscious and true findings will be compromised. By using deception, the research can
observe the true picture of the participants behavior. Also, deception can be used in recaches
when there is no other alternative is existed to measure the particular phenomena of interest
then deception can be used to get true findings. Deception can be used if it ensure the rule of
Beneficences and non-maleficence in which research to do work for the benefit of the society
and do not harm the participants. Beyond the justification of deception, it is considered
unethical in research and there is something alternate to deception which can be used as
debriefing is the technique in which researcher disclose the incomplete information about the
study and provide the information about the experiment or study and purposes of the study.
deception with no physical and emotional harm can be used and other then this naturalistic
in psychological research.
Answer:
Replication in research is the process to repeat the study to validate its findings. Accuracy,
honesty and transparency is basic fundamental rules in any profession and if any study is
unable to replicate then it directly hit the accuracy of that particular study. Like the other
fields, in psychology the crisis of replication is a major challenge in academic and practical
both domains. Lack of transparency, flawed and duplicated results or findings leads toward
replication failure. Failure in replication means study have lacking in validity and reliability
and due to lack of reliability it cannot be genialized. Replication crises raise the question
mark of the research process and credibility of the researcher. To address the issues related to
research. For example, when someone is conducting research or experiment, they publish
only accepted hypothesis or results but it is important to publish positive and negative results
that study can be replicate and could generate true findings. Improvement in methodology,
advance training and mentoring can improve the replication as multi methods and advance
research. Discuss the ethical justifications for and against the use of placebos in
Answer
A pacebo-controll traits are experiments in which there are two groups of participants and
one is get the original treatment and the other is get fake treatment which is called
placebo. Everything is same in between groups except the treatment originality. The
purpose of the placebo is to create the difference in their outcomes. For example, to see
the effects of alcohol on sleep both groups are given the treatment of alcohol but one
group is given the original dose of alcohol and the other group is given a drink seems the
alcohol. Placebo is like a deception as participants are believing they are getting treatment
but they are not. O overcome the ethical consideration informed consent should be taken
from the participants and researcher provide the information about the true nature of the
study. Non- Maleficence and beneficence should be ensured to minimize the risk and
maximize the benefits for the participants. However, placebo trails have ethical concerns
but, in some experiments, it is necessary to find the real picture or effectiveness of the
intervention. It can be justified as it ensures the validity of the study i.e., to assess the
effectiveness of any new treatment. Other than this it controls the biasness factor of the
participants i.e., if the participants are aware about the treatment, then they can be
attributed the fake behavior, with placebo the biasness can be controlled. Beyond the
benefits the placebo trails sometime violate the ethical considerations as it involves the
deception and violate the autonomous right of the participants because they are unaware
about the true nature of the study so they are unable to make decision about the
participation in study.
among researchers.
Answer:
Transparency and accountability are essential for maintaining the ethical concerns in
professional clinical research as it should based on truth and demonstrate the scientific
integrity and accuracy. Lack of integrity and accuracy lead toward the many challenges
someone’s work and the outcomes of the research. Together, they both promote the
honest and reliable practice in research field. There are several ways which can be used to
ethics can aware the researchers about the responsibility of the research accuracy. Study
replications are promoted to validate the previous findings. During the publication and
after the publication peer review should be encouraged to enhance the transparency of the
researches.