HRM Module 3
HRM Module 3
HRM Module 3
o At the basic level, it is about finding out the current level of employee performance so
that appropriate steps can be taken to eventually upgrade the performance level.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Many managers conduct this kind of evaluation on their employees from time to time
majorly because it is an organizational tradition or requirement but not necessarily
because of its impact on the future.
KPAs and KRAs are used for bringing in KPAs or KRAs are used as planning
objectivity. mechanisms
Developmental needs are identified at the end Developmental needs are identified in the
of the year on the basis of the appraisal of beginning of the year on the basis of the
competency gaps. competency requirements for the coming year.
There are review mechanisms to ensure There are review mechanisms essentially to
objectivity in ratings. bring performance
Improvements.
It is a system with deadlines, meetings, input, It is a system with deadlines, meetings, input,
and a format and output. output, and a format.
Format-driven with emphasis on those Linked Process driven with emphasis on the format as
to promotions, rewards, training and an aid Linked to performance improvements
development interventions, placements, etc. and through them to other career decisions as
and when necessary.
1) Compare/contrast error
When appraising employees, it is important never to compare their abilities and using it to
make a judgment.
Each employee is gifted in their unique way and thus has different strengths and weaknesses.
When you try to compare or contrast their abilities, it means that you will not get a fair
review because high performers will certainly make relatively low performers for particular
tasks to look below average, which on some occasions is never the case.
Of essence is to ensure that you appraise every worker by their performance against
established standards and criteria, individually.
2) Similarity error
In every organization, some employees have a resemblance of different aspects with the
manager. Now some managers usually find it easy to reward such employees highly
compared to those who portray contrasting behavior or opinion.
As a manager, it would be significant to ensure that you perform your employee appraisal
objectively and considering that diversity should be respected, try to carry out the appraisal
process based on performance and results that they provide and not primarily by
similarity/dissimilarity that you have.
3) Bias
Bias is also one of the problems with performance appraisal managers often encounter. As a
matter of fact, everyone has some biases towards someone or something irrespective of how
we portray them. However, as a manager, it is imperative not to let the biases hinder the
manner in which you approach performance evaluation process.
Your biases can manipulate the objectivity of appraisal hence it is important to ensure that
you keep it off as much as possible to make sure that you do not compromise the results of
your findings. Biases may also lead to inconsistencies among different employees bearing in
mind that the key element for attaining best results from appraisal is consistency.
If you do not like someone it will not be right to use that feeling in making review judgment,
it is unprofessional.
4) Stereotyping
Stereotyping is closely related to biases only that in this case, you tend to make your
judgment by your predetermined mindset towards a particular employee’s race, gender,
political affiliation, religious background, culture and other characteristics.
What you need to know is that stereotyping can also be positive or negative and thus can
significantly influence your judgment respectively. It is only ideal to look beyond the labels
and evaluate the employee by set standards and performance.
This is also known as the horns effect. It is a situation where you let your positive or negative
feelings towards an employee to influence your evaluation easily. It is necessary to judge
each criterion independently without compromising what you feel for the employee.
You should also be careful when doing appraisal evaluations so that in the event you realize
that most criterions are coming out with similar appraisals, you should halt and check
yourself for the halo effect. It is a fact that each employee will always portray certain areas as
their weakness and others as their strengths. What you need to do is to ensure that you do not
color the entire evaluation with a particular impression
6) Recency effect
This is majorly about carrying out an appraisal for a short period before it takes place. As
stated earlier, an appraisal is an activity that takes place continuously, which means that the
focus should not only be for the short period before it happens but rather the entire time of
the year.
In many organizations, problems with performance appraisal usually arise when a manager
decides to determine results by basing their evaluation on what an employee has achieved just
before the assessment. In this case, it sounds unfair to employees who have been outstanding
throughout but later faulted few days to assessment and vice versa because the appraisal will
not be able to reveal the actual reality.
7) Attribution error
This is one of the trickiest problems with performance appraisal. It involves making your
independent belief on possible causes of some behaviors or outcome and letting that
influence your judgment.
It is never a good idea to develop an assumption of what transpired or made the employee
behave in the manner that he or she did and later use it as a basis for reviewing the appraisal
process. It is only essential if you stick by the stipulated standards and criterion and how the
performance of each employee compares to such standards. It only becomes a fair when the
employee is judged on their performance in line with the set standards rather than
preconceived notion.
These mistakes usually arise as a result of distribution errors, which imply that the overall
dissemination of appraisal does not stand firm to the classic bell. This means that some
managers are too lenient and will end up appraising all employees above average, others will
give average whereas others would provide below average.
In the typical occasion, the results need to reflect the classic bell curve where some
employees are graded as high performers; others average while other poor performers.
However, in the unlikely event that all appraisal results come out as similar, you need to
ensure that entire performance measures are given sufficient consideration. It helps in a great
way of making sure that fair appraisal has been carried out.
1. Contextual preparation
2. Planning
3. Execution
4. Assessment
5. Review
6. Renewal of performance.
1. It presupposes that the organization would have clarified its organizational vision,
mission and strategy planning.
2. A mastery over the requirements of the jobs , and more specifically, clear definition
of the roles for performing a given job within the organizational framework is the
second prerequisite.
The pre-requisite stage also covers one more important element: the commitment and support
of the senior leadership and top management. The support is manifested through various
steps, which include:
Step 2: Planning
Key Accountabilitiesthey are broad areas of a job for which the employee is
responsible for producing results.
Performance execution is the joint responsibility for both the employee and the
manager.
Employee responsibility:
Manager responsibility:
Using multiple sources (peers, customers, and subordinates) improves the ownership
of the employee and also opens up wider area of information.
Rater problems
Problems with standards of evaluation: perceptual divergence in the use of words (e.g.
good, adequate, satisfactory) among multiple evaluators.
Halo effect: assigning values on the basis of an overall impression of the rate, created
by a positive first impression.
Central tendency error: avoiding use of high or low ratings, rather rate all employees
on an average basis.
‘Recency of events’ error: rating an employee more on the basis of recent past
behaviour (e.g., last five weeks) rather than overall performance
Contracts effects: raters let another employee’s performance influence the ratings.
Personal bias (stereotyping, similar to me): rating an employee on the basis of sex,
race, and favoritism.
At the review meeting the employee and manager discuss the ‘what’ and the
‘how’ of results achieved against performance plans.
3. Difficulties hampering performance, the reasons and the ways and means of
overcoming them, including use of skills in past achievements.
In the last phase, the manager uses insights and learning from the last cycle to more
effectively plan performance in the next cycle.
The manager and employee review and make appropriate adjustment of goals in tune
with the organization’s mission, vision, values, and strategy.
This could lead to setting new objectives and standards, new accountabilities,
development of new competencies for the upcoming performance period; and
creating the ongoing and continuous nature of the performance management
cycle.
THE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
Here are seven critical elements of performance management that will help your organization
succeed in achieving goals, cultivating career paths and tailoring talent that maximizes
organizational efficiency and performance:
There are different methods for evaluating an employee’s performance, and these methods are broadly
classified as traditional and modern methods of performance appraisal.
TRADITIONAL METHOD:
Ranking Method
In this technique, the evaluator assigns relative ranks to all the employees in the same work unit doing the
same job. The evaluator provides a rank to the employees from good to poor on the basis of their
performance. For Example, if five persons A, B, C, D, and E get a rank on the basis of their performance, it
will be like:
Paired comparison is a good method for evaluating employee performance. However, it becomes
very difficult for companies with large number of employees to form pairs as the pairs are formed
by applying the formula:
For an example, if there are four employees, the number of pairs formed will be six.
Forced Distribution System
In this technique, the rater distributes his rating in the form of a normal frequency distribution. Its basic
purpose is to eliminate the rater’s bias of central tendency. This method is extremely easy to apply and
understand. One of the disadvantages of this method is that the rater cannot explain why an employee is
there in a particular category.
Modern Methods
.
Management by objectives (MBO)
The management by objectives method is an approach that focuses on improving an organization’s
performance across the board by articulating clear objectives for the business. The entire team, both
management and employees, sets those objectives.
In this approach, an employee and manager work together to identify and plan goals for the employee to
reach, usually within a specific time frame. The manager and employee then meet regularly to discuss the
employee’s progress and make any adjustments necessary toward the goals and objectives.
1. Collecting samples of effective and ineffective job behavior from the experts by analyzing the
critical incident method
2. Converting these samples into performance dimension
3. Relocating the performance dimension (from unacceptable to outstanding)
4. Rating the performance dimension accordingly, starting from 1
5. Finally, using the scale anchor to evaluate employee’s performance
Assessment center
In the assessment center method, an organization tests its employees on both job capabilities
and social interaction skills. Written tests help evaluate ability, while situational exercises and role-playing
scenarios assist with determining an employee’s likelihood of success in carrying out responsibilities that
are part of their day-to-day role.
Performance appraisals are critical to the success of any organization. The performance
appraisal method you choose will depend on your goals and the structure of your business; the right one can
help you improve performance and provide growth opportunities across your organization.
FUTURE OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
The most debated component of PMS seems to be the used of forced ranking or
Bell curve.
REWARD
1. Reward implies all the tangible benefits and provisions an employee obtain as part of
‘employment relationship’
2. Buch (Employee perceptions of the rewards associated with six sigma. 2006) found in
his study, the concept of six sigma that indicates the four categories of rewards:
⚫ Intrinsic – Internal feelings of satisfaction, involvement, growth, autonomy
and self-competence
⚫ Social – Alderfer’s social relatedness and affiliation are associated with team
based projects that reinforce the employees to interact with peers in order to
obtain the shared goal outcomes (Larson 2003)
⚫ Organisational – refer to the probability of increased profits and productivity:
extensive training that streamlined the main business processes and good
communications between the employees and management
A. TOTAL COMPENSATION
2. Old Pay is the frozen system based on ‘tenure, entitlement and internal equity’. The
New Pay is linked ‘to the success of the employee and the firm’. The New New Pay
suggests a new system of 10 variables that form the Total Compensation system’ or
the Cafeteria Compensation.
⚫ X = any unique element that an employee wants that the workplace can
facilitate ("Can I bring my dog to work?")
3. TOTAL REWARDS
⚫ It integrates the financial and non financial elements of rewards into a unified
whole
⚫ The WorldatWork Total Rewards Model, depicts the strategic elements of the
employer-employee exchange, and indicates how external influences and an
increasingly global business environment affect ‘attraction, motivation,
retention and engagement’ of employees
6. Talent development and career opportunities : Provides the opportunity and tools
for employees to advance their skills and competencies in both their short- and long-
term careers
BASIC PAY
VARIABLE PAY
FRINGE BENEFITS
PERQUISITES
ALLOWANCES
BASIC PAY: Basic salary is the base income of an individual. Basic salary is the
amount paid to employees before any reductions or increases due to overtime or
bonus, allowances (internet usage for those who work from home or communication
allowance).
III. Individual Performance Linked Pay: They are tied to individual levels of
performance measurement (typically performance appraisal ratings), and the
payouts allocated under merit plans are commonly added into an individual
employee's base salary.
FRINGE BENEFITS: Fringe benefit, any nonwage payment or benefit (e.g., pension
plans, profit-sharing programs, vacation pay, and company-paid life, health, and
unemployment insurance programs) granted to employees by employers. It may be
required by law, granted unilaterally by employers, or obtained through collective
bargaining.
ALLOWANCES Allowances are the financial benefits that are provided to the
employees by the employers over their regular salary. While some allowances are
taxable under the head salaries, some are partly taxable or fully non-taxable.
Entertainment allowance.
Overtime allowance.
Interim allowance.
Project allowance.
Tiffin/meals allowance.
Uniform allowance.
THEORIES OF COMPENSATION
REINFORCEMENT THEORY
Expectancy theory proposes that people are motivated when they believe they can
accomplish the task, they will get the reward, and the rewards for doing the task are worth
the effort.
Three Variables
All three variable conditions must be met in Vroom’s formula for motivation to take place:
Expectancy refers to the person’s perception of his or her ability (probability) to accomplish an
objective. Generally, the higher one’s expectancy, the better the chance for motivation. When
employees do not believe that they can accomplish objectives, they will not be motivated to try.
Instrumentality refers to belief that the performance will result in getting the reward.
Generally, the higher one’s instrumentality, the greater the chance for motivation. If employees
are certain to get the reward, they probably will be motivated. When not sure, employees may not
be motivated.
For example, Dan believes he would be a good manager and wants to get promoted. However,
Dan has an external locus of control and believes that working hard will not result in a promotion
anyway. Therefore, he will not be motivated to work for the promotion.
Valence refers to the value a person places on the outcome or reward. Generally, the higher the
value (importance) of the outcome or reward, the better the chance of motivation.
For example, the supervisor, Jean, wants an employee, Sim, to work harder. Jean talks to Sim and
tells him that working hard will result in a promotion. If Sim wants a promotion, he will probably
be motivated. However, if a promotion is not of importance to Sim, it will not motivate him.
The Adam’s Equity Theory was proposed by John Stacey Adams, and is based on the
following assumptions:
Individuals make contributions (inputs) for which they expect certain rewards
(outcomes).
To validate the exchange, an individual compares his input and outcomes with
those of others and try to rectify the inequality.
There are three types of exchange relationships that arise when an individual input/outcomes
are compared with that of the other persons.
1. Overpaid Inequity: When an individual perceives that his outcomes are more
as compared to his inputs, in relation to others.
2. Underpaid Inequity: When an individual perceives that his outcomes are less
as compared to his inputs, in relation to others.
3. Equity: An individual perceives that his outcomes in relation to his inputs are equal
to those of others.
Thus, Adam’s equity theory shows the level of motivation among the individuals in the
working environment. An individual is said to be highly motivated if he perceives to be
treated fairly. While the feelings of de-motivation arise, if an individual perceives to be
treated unfairly in the organization.
Thus, an individual’s level of motivation depends on the extent he feels being treated fairly,
in terms of rewards, in comparison to others.
TYPES OF EQUITY
– INTERNAL EQUITY – Internal equity exists when the employees perceive that
the wages are commensurate with the relative internal value of each job
– INDIVIDUAL EQUITY – When individuals who on similar jobs are compensated on
the basis of variations in individual performance, in so-called pay for performance,
individual equity occurs
Reactions to Inequity
– Paid by time:
– Paid by quality:
The forces of demand and supply of human resources, no doubt, play a role in compensation
decision. Employees with rare skill sets and expertise gained through experience command
higher wage and salary than the ones with ordinary skills abundantly available in the job
market. But the higher supply of human resources for certain jobs may not lead to reduction
of wages beyond a floor level due to Government’s prescription of minimum wage levels and
employee union’s bargaining strength.
Similarly, this factor by itself does not result in lower pay if the vast majority of available
resources are unemployable due to poor skill and low talent. Thus, it is clear that law of
demand and supply applies to labour market only to a limited extent.
2. Economic Conditions:
Organizations having state-of-the-art technology in place, excellent productivity records,
higher operational efficiency, a pool of skilled man power, etc., can be better pay masters.
Thus, compensation is the consequence of the level of competitiveness .prevailing in a
given industry.
3. Prevailing Wage Level:
Most of the organizations fix their pay in keeping with the level for similar jobs in the
industry. They frequently conduct wage survey and accordingly seek to keep their wage
level for different jobs. If a particular firm keeps its pay level higher than those of others
in the industry, its employee cost becomes heavier which may escalate the end cost of the
products. This will affect the competitiveness of the firm. On the other hand, if a firm
keeps its pay level lower than the prevailing rates, it may not recruit the skilled and
competent man power.
4. Government Control:
Government through various legislative enactments such as Minimum Wages Act, 1948,
Payment of Wage Act, 1936, Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, Payment of Bonus Act,
1965, dealing with Provident Funds, Gratuity, Companies Act, etc., have a bearing on
compensation decisions. Therefore, firms have to decide on salaries and wages in the
light of the relevant Acts.
5. Cost of Living:
Increase in the cost of living, raise the cost of goods and services. It varies from area to
area within a country and from country to country. The changes in compensation are
based on consumer price index which measures the average change in the price of basic
necessities like food, clothing, fuel, medical service, etc., over a period of time.
Allowances like Dearness Allowance. City compensatory allowances are paid to meet
the increasing cost of living and parity among employees posted at different geographies.
6. Union’s Influence:
The collective bargaining strength of the trade unions also influence the wage levels.
Trade unions enjoy an upper hand in certain industries like banking, insurance, transport
and other public utilities. Therefore, wage structure in such industries and in such Union-
active regions, salary and wage need to be fixed and revised in consultation with the
unions for ensuring smooth industrial relation.
7. Globalization:
The collective bargaining strength of the trade unions also influence the wage levels.
Trade unions enjoy an upper hand in certain industries like banking, insurance, transport
and other public utilities. Therefore, wage structure in such industries and in such Union-
active regions, salary and wage need to be fixed and revised in consultation with the
unions for ensuring smooth industrial relation.
8. Cross Sector Mobility:
Contemporary companies find it difficult to benchmark the salaries of their staff with
others in the industry thanks to mobility of talent across the sectors. For example,
hospitality sector employees are hired by airlines, BPOs, healthcare companies and
telecom companies.
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
a. Allowances
b. Perquisites.
Dale Yoder (Personnel Management and Industrial Relations. Prentice Hall. 1942)
considers IR to be “a designation of a whole field of relationship that exists
because of the necessary collaboration of men and women in the employment
processes of Industry”.
1. No. of Strikes & lockouts and their intensity - man days / man-hours lost &
production loss during last five years.
2. Productivity improvement initiatives and result achieved.
3. Welfare measures and CSR activities launched by the company.
4. Training/re-training and skill development initiatives taken by the company
for employee's development.
5. Number of Industrial Disputes pending.
6. Information about grievance machinery set up by the management at various
levels for redressal of genuine grievances of workers.
JOHN DUNLOP gave the systems theory of industrial relations in the year 1958. He
believed that every human being belongs to a continuous but independent social
system culture which is responsible for framing his or her actions, behaviour and
The industrial relations system was based on three sets of different variables:
Actors: By actors here we mean that the individuals or parties involved in the
process of developing sound industrial relations. This variable is denoted by ‘A’.
Contexts: The contexts refer to the setup in which the actors perform the given
tasks. It includes the industry markets (M), technologies (T) and the power
distribution in the organization and labour unions(P).
Ideology: The similar ideas, mentality or beliefs shared by the actors helps to blend
the system. It can be expressed by the initial (I) role.
UNITARIST APPROACH
Under unitary approach, industrial relations are grounded in mutual co- operation,
individual treatment, team-work, and shared goals. Work place conflict is seen as a
temporary aberration, resulting from poor management, from employees who do
not mix well with the organizational culture.
This theory believes that the conflicts are non-permanent malformations, which are
a result of improper management in the organization.
PLURALIST APPROACH
The pluralist theory also called the ‘Oxford Approach’, was proposed by Flanders in
the year 1970. This approach explained that the management and the trade unions are
the different and robust sub-groups which unanimously form an organization.
Following are some of the highlights of this approach:
The organization should appoint personnel experts and industrial relations specialists
to act as mediators between the management and trade unions. They need to look into
the matters of staffing, provide consultation to the managers and the unions, and
negotiate with both the parties in case of conflicts.
The organization should ensure that the trade unions get recognized and the union
leaders or representatives can perform their duties freely.
In the case of industrial disputes, the organization can avail the services of
the external agent for settlement of such issues.
The managers should resolve to a collective bargaining agreement when there is a
need for negotiation and settlement with the trade unions.
Marxist Approach
This theory perceived that the industrial relations depend upon the relationship
between the workers (i.e., employees or labour) and the owners (i.e., employer or
capital). There exists a class conflict between both the groups to exercise a higher
control or influence over each other.
SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH
The industries comprise of different human beings who need to communicate with the
individuals of other organizations.
Due to the difference in their attitude, skills, perception, personality, interests, likes
and dislikes, needs, they are usually involved in one or the other conflict. Even
the social mobility and other aspects including transfer, default, group dynamics,
stress, norms, regulations and status of the workers influence their output and the
industrial relations.
GANDHIAN APPROACH
The Gandhian approach to industrial relations was proposed by the father of our
nation, Mahatma Gandhi or Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, who was also a well-
known labour leader.
The Gandhian approach illustrated that nature had provided us with human
capabilities and different kinds of property. Thus, such nature’s gift belongs to the
whole society and cannot be considered as of personal possession by anyone.
The objective of this theory is to adopt non-violent ways to bring in economic parity
and material enhancement in a capitalist society.
Gandhi Ji perceived that every organization is a joint venture, and the labour should
be treated as associates or co-partners with the shareholders. Moreover, the workers
should have proper knowledge of all the business transactions as it is their right.
He focussed on increasing the production and believed that the gains should be shared
with the employees because of whom it has been possible.
He also emphasized that the industrial disputes and conflicts between the parties
should be resolved healthily through interactions, arbitration and bilateral
negotiations.
This theory gained massive popularity and is applied to address disputes and
misunderstandings in the organizational setup even today.
PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH
The psychologists perceived the problem of the industrial relations as a result of the
varying perception and mindset of the key participants, i.e., the employees and the
management.
The ‘thematic application test’ was conducted by Mason Harie to understand the
behaviour, mindset and perception of the two significant workgroups, i.e., executive
and the union leaders, in a particular situation.
In this test, both the groups were asked to rate and interpret the photograph of an
ordinary middle-aged person, and the results were drastically contrasting. The union
leaders perceived the person to be a ‘manager‘ whereas, the executives thought that
the person was a ‘union leader‘.
Both the management and labour do not consider each other to be trustworthy.
Even each of these groups considers that the other one lacks emotional and
interpersonal attributes.
HUMAN RELATIONS APPROACH
The concept of human relations approach underlines the need for making the
individuals familiar with the work situations of the organization and uniting the
efforts of the workers. The purpose is to meet the social, psychological and economic
objectives, by enhancing the overall productivity.
(i) Employers.
(ii) Employees/workers.
(iii) Government. Employers have their associations to deal with labour problems and
their unions in a collective way.
IR AND HRM
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS
According to ILO, The employment relationship is the legal link between employers and
employees. It exists when a person performs work or services under certain conditions in
return for remuneration.
The formal and informal employment policies and practices of the organization.
● The development, negotiation and application of formal systems, rules and procedures
for collective bargaining, handling disputes and regulating employment. These serve to
determine the reward for effort and other conditions of employment, to protect the
interests of both employees and their employers, and to regulate the ways in which
employers treat their employees and how the latter are expected to behave at work.
● The informal as well as the formal processes that take place in the shape of continuous
interactions between managers and team leaders or supervisors on the one hand and
employee representatives and individuals on the other. These may happen within the
framework of formal agreements but are often governed by custom and practice and the
climate of relationships that has been built up over the years.
● The philosophies and policies of the major players in the industrial relations scene: the
government of the day, management and the trade unions.
● A number of parties each with different roles. These consist of the state, management,
employers’ organizations, the trade unions, individual managers and supervisors, HR
managers, employee representatives or shop stewards and employees
(ii) Control power : Controlling Power means the power actually used to direct the
corporate activities and guide the operation of the Company's bodies, whether directly or
indirectly, on a factual or legal basis.
(iii) The disciplinary power : Disciplinary power is a particular type of power which
subjects exercise over their own person, such as the application of rules of conduct and
appropriate behaviour.
Human dispirit and work Value a stable and secure job Offer secure jobs
Formal people practices are conspicuous by their absence, and the internal
environment is relaxed and friendly with strong focus on relationships
Needs to define a coherent set of values and priorities: greater equity, trust and
reciprocity
Greater employment security and Flexibility in work to create a work life balance
demanded by the new employees