World 05 00032 v2
World 05 00032 v2
World 05 00032 v2
1 Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University Ibn Tofail, B.P. 133, Kenitra 14000, Morocco;
asmaa.benayad@uit.ac.ma (A.B.); samir.bikri@uit.ac.ma (S.B.); zakiahindi77@gmail.com (Z.H.);
amonaamy99@gmail.com (A.L.); belfakirachaimaa@gmail.com (C.B.); fatima-zahra.yassif@uit.ac.ma (F.-Z.Y.);
youssef.aboussaleh@uit.ac.ma (Y.A.)
2 International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM-Bari), Via Ceglie 9,
70010 Bari, Italy
* Correspondence: elbilali@iamb.it
Abstract: Nowadays, food systems are undergoing major transformations to achieve the 2030 Sustain-
able Development Goals (SDGs). However, there are a lack of comprehensive reviews on this topic in
developing countries. This work highlights food systems’ transition towards sustainability, focusing
on Morocco. It was carried out through searching, selecting, evaluating, and synthesizing existing
relevant scholarly and gray literature. In Morocco, a meaningful transition towards sustainability is
being guided and carried out on several levels, despite numerous challenges, e.g., inability to cope
with the detrimental effects of climate change and escalating water scarcity constitute fundamental
problems. However, there are conflicting views on the outcomes of food system transformation. Some
studies showed that Morocco has increased its agri-food export and reduced poverty to less than 5%
of the population over the past decade; the proportion of wasted and malnourished children has
declined from 25 to 15% and 4 to 3%, respectively, and the 2023 Global Hunger Index (GHI) showed
a score of 9.0. Other studies showed that North Africa has entered a food security crisis; specifically,
food inflation has reached unprecedented levels in Morocco. This paper provides valuable insights
Citation: Benayad, A.; Bikri, S.;
Hindi, Z.; Lafram, A.; Belfakira, C.;
for policymakers and planners to design evidence-based policies and strategies to boost sustainable
Yassif, F.-Z.; El Bilali, H.; Aboussaleh, development in Morocco.
Y. Transition toward Sustainability in
the Moroccan Food System: Drivers, Keywords: food system; transformation; sustainable development goals; food security; sustainability;
Outcomes, and Challenges. World Morocco
2024, 5, 627–644. https://doi.org/
10.3390/world5030032
and the planet, today and tomorrow, especially with the ever-increasing global population
expected to reach 10 billion people in 30 years [4].
The urgency to transform our food systems is now irrefutable [5]. It is time to create
sustainable and resilient food systems. This intervention has the potential not only to
alleviate starvation but also facilitate significant advancements towards all seventeen
SDGs [6]. Specifically, SDG 2, which aims to eradicate famine, enhance nutrition, attain
food security, and advance sustainable agriculture, is interconnected with the other SDGs.
The 169 targets have been formulated to serve as a road map to attain a more sustainable
and favorable future for all nations [7], developed and developing ones alike.
There is a growing interest in evaluating the current food systems’ sustainability
worldwide. Going forward, many food systems are already undergoing major transforma-
tions aiming for sustainability. However, there is a lack of scientific literature reviews on
this topic in developing countries such as Morocco. Indeed, a search carried out on the
Web of Science—using the following query: “food system” AND Morocco AND (transition
or transformation) and (sustainability or sustainable)—returned only one document, namely
El Ghmari et al. [8]. This shows the marginality of the topic in scholarly literature and,
consequently, the impossibility of carrying out a systematic review. For that, this paper com-
bines scholarly literature, retrieved from different sources, and grey literature (e.g., reports,
policy documents). It aims to compile—in one review paper—basic information about
food system transformation towards sustainability in the world, focusing on Morocco;
it addresses the key drivers, interventions and achievements, challenges, opportunities,
and outcomes.
aspects. The food environment encompasses the presence and accessibility of food, its
cost-effectiveness, as well as its safety, quality, and comfort. Additionally, advertising
also plays a role in shaping the food environment [13,14,16]. The attributes of the food
environment impact individuals’ dietary choices by shaping their access to food [11].
Personal determinants such as financial status, cognitive processes, ambitions, and
life circumstances influence an individual’s food selection and consumption. Income can
determine affordable dietary options, while environmental consciousness and nutritional
status can influence purchasing habits. Work or domestic environments also impact the time
available for food preparation. The way individuals engage with their food environment
ultimately determines their food choices and consumption [11].
Consumer behaviors consist of individuals’ selections of food items, as well as their
practices regarding food preparation, storage, consumption, and domestic food sharing.
Additionally, individual and environmental factors impact consumer behavior. A substan-
tial amount of rigorous research has been conducted on consumer behavior; however, there
is a lack of internationally and nationally accepted key indicators of consumer behavior [11].
A sustainable food system ensures that the environmental and socioeconomic foun-
dations for providing and preserving of nutritional resilience, food security, and nutrition
for forthcoming generations while ensuring that all individuals have access to nutrition
and food security [12]. In order to be economically viable, provide equitable and balanced
societal benefits (social sustainability), and maintain a positive or neutral environmental
footprint (environmental sustainability), sustainable food systems must yield favorable
outcomes across the three dimensions of sustainability [12].
A holistic approach is taken to the development of a sustainable agricultural system.
Concurrently generating beneficial advantages in the socioeconomic and environmental
spheres is essential for sustainable food system development. When every action conducted
by a participant in the food system or a supplier of assistance is financially or economically
feasible, the food system is deemed sustainable from an economic standpoint. Benefits
to laborers, taxes to governments, profits for businesses, and an enhanced food supply
for consumers are all categories of constituents for whom the activities ought to generate
economic added value. When added economic value is distributed equitably, considering
vulnerable groups classified by gender, age, race, and other factors, a food system is deemed
sustainable on the social dimension [12].
Anthropogenic endeavors within the food system ought to enhance sociocultural
outcomes such as health, nutrition, labor conditions, and animal welfare. By ensuring that
food system activities do not have adverse effects on the natural environment, including
carbon and water emissions, food loss, pollution, animal and plant health, and biodiversity,
environmental sustainability is achieved [12].
3.1. Drivers
Drivers are considered to be factors that strongly influence the evolution of future
scenarios. They include climate change, globalization, income growth and socio-economic
development, urbanization, population growth, policies, and socio-cultural traditions.
Ongoing economic recovery and increasing incomes, rapid urbanization, consistent popula-
tion growth, intensifying globalization, and digitalization are the primary forces propelling
food system transformation in Africa [19].
In recent times, food systems have been significantly impacted by a range of transfor-
mative developments. These include economic and social transformations (such as the rise
of middle-income earners in developing nations, swift demographic expansion, and urban
World 2024, 5 630
3.2. Outcomes
Dietary patterns are health and nutritionally significant and are impacted by each
component of the food system. A nutritious diet begins early in life and consists of
a variety of foods, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). This includes
carbohydrate staples, legumes, fruits and vegetables, and animal products (e.g., dairy
and meat). With a healthful diet, energy expenditure and intake are in balance, and
sodium, fat, added sugar, highly processed foods, and sugar-sweetened beverages are
restricted [33]. People continue to lack sufficient calories and a diversity of nutritious,
nutrient-dense foods on a global scale. This dearth of access results in micronutrient
deficiencies and malnutrition. The availability and accessibility of nutrient-dense foods,
including fruits, vegetables, and seafood, have been enhanced by rising incomes. However,
rising incomes and globalization have also contributed to an increase in the consumption
of harmful foods [13,34], including highly processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages.
In addition, consumers, policymakers, and researchers are placing a greater emphasis on
the environmental sustainability of nutrition [35]. Diets and food systems have a substantial
impact on greenhouse gas emissions and the utilization and depletion of water and land
resources [11].
World 2024, 5 632
For proper nutrition and health, healthy diets are essential. Worldwide, inadequate
dietary habits constitute a significant hazard of death [36]. Poor nutrition, which is linked
to impaired cognitive development and increased vulnerability to infections, is a signif-
icant contributor to disease and a primary risk factor. Micronutrient deficiencies can be
induced by diets deficient in vital nutrients. In addition to noncommunicable diseases like
cardiovascular disease and diabetes, diets that surpass the recommended energy intake,
especially those comprised of unhealthful dietary patterns, may contribute to weight gain
and obesity. A significantly elevated mortality risk is associated with diets that are rich in
sodium and deficient in omega-3 fatty acids, whole cereals, seeds, fruits, and vegetables [36].
Additionally, the health of consumers and food system employees is impacted by pesticide
use, food safety, and antimicrobial resistance [12].
Global and local environments are impacted by food systems. Worldwide food pro-
duction contributes to approximately 19% to 29% of total greenhouse gas emissions, which
exacerbates climate change [17]. Environmental impacts are distinct for various food pro-
duction methods. Particularly detrimental to the environment is the production of ruminant
flesh and dairy products, which is contingent upon the production method employed in
various contexts. Large quantities of water and land may be required for production, which
may also generate substantial greenhouse gas emissions. More pesticides and fertilizers
are required for intensive agriculture. In addition, monoculture and the production of
commercial crops can contribute to the loss of biodiversity. This can degrade the soil and
reduce the resilience of the agricultural system to drought and other extreme weather
events [14,37].
The agricultural system is one of the most significant employment sectors on a global
scale. The agricultural sector serves as the primary economic driver for low-income and
middle-income nations. Problem modifications and alterations in food systems can exert
substantial economic influence on retailers, consumers, and producers [14]. Increases
in imported food products, for instance, could result in decreased production of local
staples and increased competition among smallholder farmers. However, assistance to
export-oriented sectors could potentially result in a surge in cash crop generation among
domestic producers. Additionally, trade can spur increased investment in the technology
and agricultural industries, thus creating new jobs [23,24].
Food systems are vital to the well-being of a community; they contribute to the
assurance that every member is in the best possible health. Food systems can contribute
to this objective by ensuring that every member of society has an equal opportunity to
consume a nutritious diet. They can also ensure that employees of the food system are
employed in safe, well-paid environments. Equitable food systems contribute to the
advancement of animal rights, labor rights, gender equality, and societal health [14,38].
Advancements in food systems have generated numerous favorable outcomes, pre-
dominantly in developing nations. The development of food industries has resulted in the
expansion of off-farm employment opportunities and a broader selection of foods beyond
regional staples, thereby catering to consumers’ inclinations regarding flavor, appearance,
and excellence. Nevertheless, the swift structural changes that have ensued as a result have
given rise to mounting and substantial obstacles, which may have far-reaching implications
for the condition of nutrition and food security. The issues at hand encompass a variety
of concerns. These include the widespread availability and consumption of food items
that are highly processed, high in calories, and lack nutritional value; the restricted market
access for small-scale producers and agricultural enterprises; the significant quantities of
food wastage; the increase in food safety incidents, and animal and human health issues;
and the intensified energy consumption and environmental consequences that arise from
the industrialization and growth of food supply chains [39].
World 2024, 5 633
• Founded in 2009, the National Office of Food Safety (Office National de Sécurité
Sanitaire des produits Alimentaires, ONSSA) monitors and protects the animal and
plant heritage of the country at the national level and the borders. The office ensures
food safety from primary products to the final consumer, including fish products
and animal feed. It provides registration and inspection of agricultural inputs and
registration of veterinary drugs. ONSSA applies phytosanitary and veterinary policies,
laws and measures and provides risk assessment [43].
The financing and functioning of Morocco’s food systems are ensured by many insti-
tutions/tools:
• Founded in 1986, the Agricultural Development Fund (Fonds de Développement
Agricole, FDA) endeavors to stimulate privately funded investment in agriculture. To
achieve this, it offers targeted motivators, including financial support, that encourage
the adoption of irrigation and enhance the yield of vegetables and fruits. Additionally,
it develops downstream activities and improves breeding practices to bolster the
performance of the cattle sector [44]. Thus, the FDA functions as an instrument for
executing governmental policies in the agricultural industry and as a mechanism to
stimulate ventures [45]. In the year 2019, the budgeted encouragement totaled MAD
8.6 billion, and farmers owning less than 10 ha accounted for 58% of the recipients.
FDA expenditures increased to MAD 9.7 billion within 2020 and are anticipated to
surpass MAD 10 billion in 2021 [46].
• Founded in 1949, the Credit Guarantee Corporation (Caisse Centrale de Garantie,
CCG) of Morocco is considered a state instrument. It contributes to boost private
initiatives by encouraging the creation, development, and modernization of companies.
Additionally, the CCG supports social development through guaranteeing loans for
housing [47].
• Founded in 2010, Tamwil El Fellah (TEF) was originally established as the Banque de
Développement Agricole (BDA), which was formerly known as the Credit Agricole
Group of Morocco (Groupe Credit Agricole du Maroc, GCAM). Small producers are
eligible for collateral-free financial services through a partnership between the GCAM
and the Moroccan government. About 25% of the farmer’s income, was established
as the loan limit. Inputs and working capital may account for no more than 20%
of the total, while other investments may account for no more than 80%. TEF, on
the other hand, offers a partial guarantee program under which the government
insures 60% of the risk. To accommodate the lengthier and more seasonal nature
of agricultural finance, adjustments have been made to the loan term. GCAM has
expanded its client base and improved risk management by prolonging the periods
in which loans are deemed pre-doubtful, doubtful, and compromised [48]. TEF also
promotes productivity and enhances low-risk investments, such as in mechanization
and irrigation, through facilitating credit for these investments. The financial services
are complemented by technical assistance [49]. By 2015, the operations of TEF had
reached break-even point. By 2016, more than 67,000 smallholders had benefited from
loans, and the loan repayment rate at the end of the term was 98%. About 70% of the
loans had been granted to finance investments in dairy production, irrigation, agricul-
tural equipment, and tree planting [50]. Particularly popular reasons for borrowing
included the conversion of crops towards higher value-added production like olives,
almonds and figs, diversification towards off-farm and processing activities, and in-
tensification. Interestingly, as of October 2015, more than 1800 irrigation projects using
solar water pumping systems have also been funded. The model was so successful
that it has also been extended to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [48].
• Founded in 1963, the Mutual Moroccan Agricultural Insurance Company (Mutuelle
Agricole Marocaine d’Assurances, MAMDA) is a significant agricultural insurance
company in Morocco. MAMDA and the Moroccan government have formed a public–
private partnership to manage Morocco’s agricultural insurance program, which
covers a wide range of climatic and agricultural risks. MAMDA offers multi-risk
World 2024, 5 635
climate insurance coverage for large crops in three agricultural zones and 10 regions
of Morocco, with five levels of insured capital, and also manages, on behalf of the
State, a multi-risk guarantee fund for fruit trees. For the first insurance product, a
range of insurance amounts and subsidies are offered for the 15 possible zone/level
combinations. Eligibility for payment of claims is officially declared when the yield of
insured crops falls below 60% of the average yield of the previous 10 years in a rural
municipality. Designing and operating this insurance system is very complex. Only
17% of farmers are insured in Morocco (with the reduction in cereal areas in recent
years, this rate has increased to 40%). Insurance mainly covers large farms: while 40%
of large farms (>50 ha) are insured, this is the case for only 24% of medium farms
(10 to 50 ha) and less than 3% of small farms (<10 ha) [51].
• By leveraging educational and training institutions, a network of 52 institutions has
been created in Morocco with 24 different curricula across the country to improve
the uptake and efficiency of agribusiness. Furthermore, eight secondary schools
prepare young people to obtain a baccalaureate degree in agricultural sciences in
addition to 30 middle schools in rural areas dedicated to training young people
in agricultural technology. All agricultural vocational training institutions provide
vocational training to improve employment opportunities for rural youth who are
not in school, but have basic literacy skills. Every year, 10,000 young people receive
retraining in 20 professions [33].
Many institutions work for employment and skills development in the agrifood sector:
• Founded in 2000, the National Agency for the Promotion of Employment and Skills
(Agence Nationale de Promotion de l’Emploi et des Compétences, ANAPEC) facilitates
access to job opportunities by matching individual skills with labor market require-
ments. The agency provides intensive training programs to enhance job seekers’ skills,
making them more prepared for the requirements of modern jobs. ANAPEC pro-
vides career counseling to help individuals identify the best career paths and develop
their professional plans. Many testimonials from individuals who have benefited
from the agency’s services show important changes in their career paths, highlight-
ing the agency’s effective role in improving individuals’ lives and providing real job
opportunities [52].
• Founded in 1999, the Social Development Agency (Agence de Développement Social,
ADS) was set up as a public agency with legal status and financial autonomy, and
with a mandate to initiate and support programs aimed at sustainably improving
the living conditions of the most vulnerable populations, including smallholders. It
finances income-generating activities and employment opportunities, such as food
processing and local restaurants, and provides financing that covers all stages from
production to consumption. ADS, for example, has funded the program «TATMINE»,
which promotes local production chains for small farmers, including women [53].
to the extent that all vegetables, livestock, and milk are produced domestically, in
addition to approximately 70% of the local cereal market. Agricultural value was
added, and agricultural exports increased twofold between 2007 and 2018. The PMV
facilitated the creation of over 250,000 agricultural sector jobs. The implementation
of interventions, including agricultural insurance, irrigation, and water management,
benefited over 2.7 million individuals. Each USD 1 of publicly funded incentives
generated USD 2.3 of private investment [56].
• The Green Generation Strategy (GG), which is aligned with the 2030 Agenda, spans
the years 2020 to 2030. Building upon the achievements of the PMV, the GG provides
a contemporary instrument for agricultural development, a fresh perspective on the
sector, and a framework for recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic and bolstering
the resilience of rural regions. Human capital development and sustainable agricul-
tural development comprise its two pillars, respectively [57]. Pillar I promotes the
formation of a new generation of youthful entrepreneurs and an agricultural middle
class comprised of 10,000 families. By bolstering the performance of the agricultural
value chain, doubling agricultural exports and gross domestic product (GDP) by 2030,
and modernizing wholesale markets to ensure more efficient merchandise dispersal,
the second Pillar will guarantee the long-term viability of agricultural progress and
seeks to stimulate the annual revenue of production chains and ecotourism, replant
13,000 ha of forest, and generate an additional 2750 direct employment jobs. A mul-
titude of facets of food security are influenced by the two pillars when joined. By
establishing forest nurseries, an educational and research institution, a water and
forest agency, and a nature conservation agency, the GG intends to inspire and engage
local communities in forest management activities. Profiting from the comparative
advantages of each region, it is implemented using a regional strategy [58].
• Halieutis Plan (Plan Halieutis), which was introduced in 2009 as a supplement to the
PMV’s emphasis on agricultural and cattle farming, seeks to improve the sector’s
competitiveness in the global economy, preserve of marine biomes and the fishing
sector, as well as increase quality and productivity. It aimed to increase the sector’s con-
tribution to gross domestic product and exports, as well as enhance food and nutrition
security, all while ensuring the water resources’ long-term viability. Three processing
zones were established in Tangier (northern Morocco), Agadir (central Morocco), and
Laayoune-Dakhla (southern Morocco) to increase annual domestic fish consumption
from 11 kg to 16 kg per capita. The productivity of marine fisheries increased by 7.2%
in value by 2017, a 2.3% annual average increase. Presently, 108,000 positions are
aboard vessels and 97,000 are on shore in the marine fisheries industry. By elevating
fish consumption per capita in Morocco from 11 kg in 2009 to 14 kg in 2017, the
associated increased production enhanced the country’s food security and nutrition.
Additionally, private investment in the sector amounted to USD 295 million. Fish pro-
cessing industry investment peaked at 13% [59]. However, a strategy operating under
the territorialization approach has been formulated for the period of 2020–2030 [43].
• Initiative Nationale pour le Développement Humain (INDH) translates to the National
Human Development Initiative and is a territorial approach to administering agricul-
tural systems, which has been adopted by Morocco to facilitate a more inclusive politi-
cal process and bring the decision-making process closer to the populace. Initiated in
2005 by the King of Morocco to tackle the underlying factors that contribute to poverty
and socioeconomic exclusion, the INDH embodies this novel framework. The INDH
endeavors to alleviate poverty through the promotion of collective entrepreneurial
thought and networking, as well as the establishment of income-generating activities.
Under the INDH, a multi-level governance structure including a strategic committee
has been adopted. Under the INDH, agricultural and rural development are top prior-
ities [60]. From 2005 to 2014, over 80% of financed endeavors were concentrated in the
farming sector. Youth and women residing in rural regions comprised the majority of
Initiated
entrepreneurial in 2005thoughtby the King and of Morocco toastackle
networking, well as the theunderlying
establishment factors that contrib-
of income-gen-
World 2024, 5, FOR PEER REVIEW 11
ute to poverty
erating activities. andUnder
socioeconomic
the INDH,exclusion, a multi-level the INDH governance embodies this novel
structure includingframe-a
work.
strategic Thecommittee
INDH endeavors has beentoadopted. alleviateUnder poverty thethrough
INDH,the promotionand
agricultural of collective
rural de-
entrepreneurial
velopment are top thought
prioritiesand [60].
networking,
From 2005 as well as the
to 2014, over establishment
80% of financed of income-gen-
endeavors
Initiated
erating in 2005 byUnder
activities.
were concentrated the
in the King
the of
farming Morocco
INDH, sector. to tackle
a multi-level
Youth andthe underlying
governance
women factors
structure
residing that
in rural contrib-
including
regions a
World 2024, 5 ute to poverty and socioeconomic exclusion, the INDH embodies this novel frame-637
strategic committee has been adopted. Under
comprised the majority of the beneficiaries [61]. In addition, efforts were made to the INDH, agricultural and rural de-
work.
velopment
strengthen The INDH are
the top endeavors
actors priorities
engaged toin
[60].alleviate
From
the poverty
2005
implementation through
to 2014, over
of the the
80% promotion
INDHof financed
and developofendeavors
collective
their
entrepreneurial
were concentrated
capabilities [55].thoughtin theand networking,
farming sector. Youth as welland as thewomen establishment
residing in ofrural
income-gen-
regions
• the beneficiaries
erating
comprised activities.
A collaboration [61].
the majorityUnder
among In addition,
thethe
of
nine INDH, efforts
beneficiaries
ministries were[61].
a multi-level
resulted made inIn toaddition,
the strengthen
governance
conception the
structure
effortsand actors
were engaged
including
made to
execution ofa
in
thethe
strategic
strengthenimplementation
National committee
the actorshas
Nutrition of the INDH
been
engaged
Strategy theand
adopted.
in(SNN) develop
Under
implementation
for the
the period their
INDH, capabilities
of theagricultural
2011–2019 INDH [55].
[62].and Byand
develop ruraltheir
ensuring de-
the
• A collaboration
velopment
capabilities
safety are
[55].
and integrity topamong
priorities
of foodnine [60].
ministries
goods, From resulted
2005
it seeks in the
to 2014,
enhance over conception
80% of financed
nutrition, and execution
food endeavors
accessibility, of
• the
were
A
and National
concentrated
collaboration Nutrition
affordability.among in Strategy
the farming (SNN)
nine ministries
To capitalize sector.
on the benefitsfor the
Youth
resulted period
and
of in 2011–2019
women
the conception
regional [62].
residing
agricultural By
in ensuring
rural
andproducts, the
regions
executionthis of
safety
comprised
the and
National
strategy integrity
the
involved Nutritiontheofimplementation
majority food
of the
Strategy goods,(SNN) it seeks
beneficiaries theto
forimproved
of enhance
[61].
period nutrition,
Incost-control
addition,
2011–2019 food
efforts
[62]. By
mechanisms, accessibility,
were
ensuringmade to
the
includ-
and
safetyaffordability.
strengthen
ing price the actors
andsupport
integrity To capitalize
forofengaged
food and
food, onthe
in
goods, the
increased benefits
itimplementationtoof
seeks efficiency regional
enhance of
ofthe agricultural
INDH food
nutrition,
small-scale and products,
develop
accessibility,
producers. this
their
Alt-
strategy
capabilities
and
hough involved
affordability.
the [55]. the
strategy To implementation
capitalize
approach was theofbenefits
onfundamentally improved cost-control
of central
regional and mechanisms,
agricultural
lacked including
products,
regional this
or local
• price
A
strategysupport
collaboration
dimensions, involved for food,
among
it didthe and nineincreased
notimplementation ministries
presume a regional efficiency
resulted
of improved of small-scale
in
orientation the producers.
conception
cost-control
[55]. and Although
execution
mechanisms, includ- the
of
• strategy
the
ing National
The price approach
National Nutrition
support was fundamentally
Strategy
for food,
Integrated Youth and (SNN)
increased
Policy central
for the and
period
(SNIJ),efficiency lacked
which spans regional
2011–2019
of small-scale or
[62].
the years 2015 local
By dimensions,
ensuring
producers.
to 2030,Alt- the
en-
it did not
safety
hough
deavors and
thetopresume
integrity
strategy
rectify aapproach
the regional
ofinefficacy orientation
food goods,
was it seeks
offundamentally
disparate [55].to enhance
central
sectoral nutrition,
and lacked
approaches food accessibility,
regional
through theor local
imple-
• The
and National
dimensions,
mentation ofitaIntegrated
affordability. did
youthTo Youth
notcapitalize
presume
policy thatonaPolicy (SNIJ),
the benefits
regional
transcends which
of
orientation
sectors.regional spans
It [55].
ensures the
agriculturalyears
that 2015for
products,
actions toyouth
2030,
this
• endeavors
strategy
The National to
involved rectify the
Integrated the inefficacy
implementation
Youth of
Policy disparate
of improved
(SNIJ), sectoral
which approaches
cost-control
spans the through
mechanisms,
years 2015 to the imple-
includ-
2030, en-
in all domains are coordinated by involving sectors including agriculture, environ-
mentation
ing price
deavors of a
support youth for
to rectify employment,policy
food, that
and
the inefficacy health, transcends
increased
of disparate sectors.
efficiency It ensures
of
sectoral approaches that
small-scale actions for
producers. youth in
Alt-
ment, education, and culture. Particularly through the imple-
for disadvantaged
all domains
hough
mentation are
the strategy
ofgroups, coordinated
a youth policy by
approach was
that involving
fundamentally
transcends sectors including
sectors.central and
Itisensures agriculture,
lacked environment,
regional
that actions foror local
youth
adolescent economic and social inclusion emphasized. Young people
education,
dimensions, employment, health, and culture. Particularly for disadvantaged adolescent
in
should reachithigh-quality
all domains did
are not presume
coordinated a regional
by
educational involving orientation
resources, sectors [55].
including
permanent agriculture, opportu-
employment environ-
• groups,
The economic
National and social
Integrated Youthinclusion
Policy is(SNIJ),
emphasized.
which Youngthe
spans people should reach high-
ment,
nities, education,
and adequate employment,
health health,
facilities; they and culture.
should also be able years
Particularly for2015
to actively to 2030,
disadvantaged
participate en-
quality
deavors educational
to rectify resources,
the inefficacy permanent
of disparate employment
sectoral opportunities,
approaches through and adequate
the imple-
adolescent groups, economic and social inclusion
in the sociopolitical and cultural sphere, and their basic rights should be respected. is emphasized. Young people
health
mentation facilities; they should
of ahigh-quality
youth policy alsotranscends
that be able to actively sectors. participate
It ensuresemployment in the
that actionssociopolitical
for youth
should
The SNIJ reachwas designed to educational
ensure greater resources,
youth permanent
participation in the formulation opportu- of
and cultural sphere, and their basic rights should be respected. The SNIJ was designed
in all
nities, domains
public and policiesadequateare coordinated by involving sectors including
[63]. health facilities; they should also be able to actively participate agriculture, environ-
to ensure greater youth participation in the formulation of public policies [63].
ment, education, employment,
in the sociopolitical and culturalhealth, sphere,and andculture.
their basic Particularly
rights should for disadvantaged
be respected.
4.1.3.adolescent
The SNIJ
Programmatic wasgroups,
4.1.3. Programmatic Approaches designed economic
Approaches to ensure and social
greater inclusion
youth is
participationemphasized. in the Young
formulation people of
should
public
To attain reach
policies
attain the high-quality
[63]. educational resources, permanent employment opportu-
To the objectives
objectivesofofits itsvarious
variouspolicies, policies, plans,
plans, and andinitiatives,
initiatives, Morocco
Morocco has has
im-
nities, several
plemented and adequate novel health facilities; they should also be able to actively participate
programs.
implemented several novel programs.
4.1.3.in the stages
sociopolitical
Programmatic
Three and
Approaches
comprise thecultural
INDH’ssphere, and their basic rights should be respected.
implementation:
Three stages comprise the INDH’s implementation:
The SNIJ
To attain was designed
the objectives to ensure greater youth participation in the formulation of
➢ Stage
Stage 11policies
(2005–2010)
(2005–2010) wasof
was
its various
organized
organized around
policies,
around four
four
plans,
programs
programs
and initiatives,
that focused
that focused Morocco
on combating
on
has im-
combating
public
plemented several novel [63].
rural poverty, urban urbanprograms.
social exclusion, and volatility,
social volatility, and and an an intervention
intervention that that spans
spans
Three stages comprise the INDH’s implementation:
human development.
4.1.3. Programmatic Approaches
➢ Stage
Stage 12 (2005–2010)
(2011–2015)was
(2011–2015) gaveorganized
gave aastrong
strongimpetusaround
impetusto four
tothe programs
theINDH
INDHinsofar that focused
insofar asasthethe on combating
financial
financial enve-
en-
To
rural
lope attain
poverty,
allocated the objectives
urban
to it was of itsexclusion,
social
increased.various Aiming policies,
and for plans,
volatility,
one and
million and initiatives,
an intervention
receivers inMorocco
3300 that
rural has im-
spans
com-
velope allocated to it was increased. Aiming for one million receivers in 3300 rural
plemented
human
munities several
development. novel programs.
encompassing 22 22isolated mountainous areas,
communities encompassing isolated mountainous areas,this thisphase
phaseof of the
the initiative
Three
Stage 2stages
➢ focused (2011–2015)comprise gave thea INDH’s
strong implementation:
impetus to the INDH insofar as the financial enve-
neighborhoods.
on rural communes and urban neighborhoods.
➢ Stage
Stage 13 (2005–2010)
lope allocated (2019–2023)
(2019–2023) to it waswas organized
increased.
solidified around
theAiming for
accomplishments
accomplishments four
one programs
million that focused
receivers
documented in
in3300 on combating
the
the rural
preceding
preceding com-
rural
munities
phases.
phases. poverty, urban upon
It encompassing
is founded
is founded social
upon exclusion,
22four
isolated
four programs
programs andthat
mountainous volatility,
that prioritize
prioritize and
areas, the
the an
this intervention
phase of
provision
provision ofof the that spans
initiative
fundamen-
fundamental
human
focused
services
tal services development.
on
andrural
and communesinand
infrastructure
infrastructure urban neighborhoods.
underdeveloped
in underdeveloped regions,
regions, assistance
assistance to those
to those in precar-
in pre-
➢ iousStage
carious circumstances, enhancement of youth income and economic integration,enve-
23 (2011–2015)
(2019–2023)
circumstances, gave a
solidified
enhancement strong the impetus to
accomplishments
of youth the
income INDH and insofar
documented
economic as the
in financial
the
integration, preceding and
and
lope allocated
phases. It is in
investment to
founded it was
humanupon increased.
capital four Aiming
to programs
foster human for one million
that development receivers
prioritize the provision in
for the benefit3300 rural
of fundamen- com-
of future
future
munities
generations
tal services encompassing
[64].infrastructure
and 22 isolated mountainous regions,
in underdeveloped areas, this phase of
assistance to the
those initiative
in pre-
focused
carious
By 2014, the on rural
circumstances,
the INDH communes
INDHhad hadfacilitatedand
enhancement urban
facilitatedthe of neighborhoods.
youth
theimplementation income
implementation and
of of economic
over over 7400 7400integration,
initiatives
initiatives inandin
the
➢
the Stage
investment
agricultural
agricultural 3 (2019–2023)
sector. in human
sector.
This This solidified
capital
includes includes to the
foster
3063 3063 accomplishments
human development
livestock-related
livestock-related documented
projects for
projects the in the
benefit
with 45,945
with 45,945 preceding
of future
benefi-
beneficiaries,
phases.
generations
ciaries,
300 local 300 It is product
local
product founded
[64].
promotion upon
promotion four programs
projects projects
with 7407 that
with prioritize
7407 the
288provision
beneficiaries,
beneficiaries, of fundamen-
288 fishery-related
fishery-related projects
tal
projects
By services
2014, the andINDH infrastructure
had in
facilitated underdeveloped
with 4320 beneficiaries, and over 723 small farmer-focused activities with a total oftotal
with 4320 beneficiaries, and over 723
the small regions,
farmer-focused
implementation of assistance
over activities
7400 to those
with
initiatives a ininpre-
of
the
10,845
10,845carious circumstances,
beneficiaries
agricultural
beneficiariessector. [55]. enhancement of youth income
[55]. This includes 3063 livestock-related projects with 45,945 beneficiaries, and economic integration, and
investment
The
300 local PMV
product wasinpromotion
human
executed capital
usingtoinventive
projects foster
with 7407 human development
interventions
beneficiaries, 288for
that the benefit
enabled ofprojects
the fulfillment
fishery-related future
of thegenerations
aims of the [64].
strategy. To establish the agricultural
with 4320 beneficiaries, and over 723 small farmer-focused activities with a total of 10,845 value chain, program contracts
and aggregation
By 2014,[55].
beneficiaries theinitiatives
INDH hadwere utilized
facilitated the toimplementation
implement Pillar ofI.overGovernment
7400 initiatives institutions,
in the
including
agricultural the Agriculture
sector. This includesand Fisheries Ministry, and projects
3063 livestock-related interprofessionalwith 45,945 establishments
beneficiaries,
associated
300 local productwith agricultural
promotion projects supply chains with 7407 jointly affixed their
beneficiaries, 288 signatures
fishery-related to program
projects
contracts.
with 4320 The contracts delineate
beneficiaries, and over the 723obligations
small farmer-focused of each participating
activities with entityato enhance
total of 10,845the
structure, output,
beneficiaries [55]. and efficiency of a specified value chain, encompassing both agricultural
and processing activities, within a timeframe of seven to ten years. The government
incentivizes private sector investment in business through the contract program, contingent
upon the value chain and activities involved. Project aggregation revolves around the
World 2024, 5 638
deliberations, and the extension of an employment instruction and direction center network
to assist youth in their job-seeking. Youth participate in brief training programs tailored to
rural environments [72]. To increase the sustainability of the paradigm, the initiative assists
important actors engaged in national and regional employment promotion. More than
2500 young men and women aged 15 to 35 benefited from the initiative during the first
phase, which ran from 2015 to 2017. Of the supported youth, 47% obtained employment or
saw an increase in income. The secondary stage of the initiative dedicates the years 2018 to
2021 to implementing the intervention in alternative provinces to expand its reach to an
additional 3000 young individuals [73].
4.3. Opportunities
By enhancing the agri-food sector’s efficiency, inclusivity, and environmental sus-
tainability, digital technologies may provide a remedy for food system improvement in
Morocco [86]. As a result, producers, consumers, and society as a whole can experience
greater benefits [80]. Increased on-farm productivity, enhanced resource utilization ef-
ficiency, and climate resilience can be facilitated by these technologies [87]. Moreover,
they can contribute to a substantial reduction in food losses and waste, as well as notable
improvements in the core areas of manufacturing, logistics, and supply-chain management.
Particularly in the agri-food industry, COVID-19 has increased awareness of the necessity
and utility of adopting digital technologies [88]. Additionally, the opportunity to ensure
food security is presented by Morocco’s climate, biogeographical, and cultural diversity,
which results in a wide range of cultivars, animal strains, and indigenous production
knowledge. In addition, Moroccan producers have demonstrated in the past a strong
capacity to manage local agriculture both individually and collectively. Morocco possesses
substantial expertise in irrigation water management and is currently progressing towards
the adoption of localized irrigation systems. By enhancing the efficacy of irrigation systems
and the sustainability of irrigation schemes, public–private partnerships in irrigation are
an effective instrument for enhancing the performance of agricultural irrigation in terms
food security is presented by Morocco’s climate, biogeographical, and cultural diversity
which results in a wide range of cultivars, animal strains, and indigenous productio
knowledge. In addition, Moroccan producers have demonstrated in the past a strong ca
pacity to manage local agriculture both individually and collectively. Morocco possesse
substantial expertise in irrigation water management and is currently progressing to
World 2024, 5 wards the adoption of localized irrigation systems. By enhancing the efficacy640
of irrigatio
systems and the sustainability of irrigation schemes, public–private partnerships in irr
gation are an effective instrument for enhancing the performance of agricultural irrigatio
in terms of water resources development. A substantial portion of agricultural productio
of water resources development. A substantial portion of agricultural production is also
is also guided by scientific and agronomic research with a focus on sustainability [61].
guided by scientific and agronomic research with a focus on sustainability [61].
4.4. Outcomes
4.4. Outcomes
Morocco has achieved notable success in its export production growth and povert
Morocco has achieved notable success in its export production growth and poverty
reduction to below 5% of the population through its agricultural planning efforts over th
reduction to below 5% of the population through its agricultural planning efforts over the
last two decades [89], particularly the latter decade. In Morocco, the proportion of waste
last two decades [89], particularly the latter decade. In Morocco, the proportion of wasted
and malnourished children declined from 25 to 15% and from 4 to 3%, respectively, an
and malnourished children declined
the country’s from 25Index
Global Hunger to 15% anddecreased
score from 4 toby 3%, respectively,
43% between 2000 andand
the 2020 [90
country’s Global Hunger Index score decreased by 43% between 2000 and 2020 [90],
with a score of 9.0 in the 2023 GHI (Figure 1) according to recent statistics, and with a a rank o
score of 9.0 in the 2023 GHI (Figure 1) according to recent statistics, and a rank of 47th
47th out of 125 countries [91]. Morocco has demonstrated notable progress in the reduc out of
125 countries [91].
tion Morocco
of povertyhasanddemonstrated
famine [92]. Ifnotable progress
we include in thegroups
significant reduction
thatof poverty
lack access to funda
and famine [92]. mental social services and adequate shelter, however, food insecurity social
If we include significant groups that lack access to fundamental affects million
services and adequate shelter, however,
more individuals. food
It has been insecuritythat
determined affects
Northmillions
Africamore individuals.
has entered a food securit
It has been determined
crisis [90].that North Africa
Specifically, foodhas entered
inflation hasareached
food security crisis [90].levels
unprecedented Specifically,
in Morocco, Tun
food inflation has
sia, reached
and Algeriaunprecedented
since the Arablevels in Morocco,
Spring Tunisia,
civil unrest and ago.
a decade Algeria since the Morocc
Furthermore,
Arab Spring civilhasunrest a decade
experienced ago. Furthermore,
a three-year average of Morocco has experienced
28% moderate-to-severe food a three-year
insecurity rate from
average of 28%2018 moderate-to-severe
to 2020. food insecurity rate from 2018 to 2020.
5. Conclusions5. Conclusions
If food systems fail, dire
If food consequences
systems are expected,
fail, dire consequences arejeopardizing humans and
expected, jeopardizing the and th
humans
planet. Therefore,
planet. Therefore, food security and the transition to sustainable food systemsof
food security and the transition to sustainable food systems are subjects are subjec
discussion today. However, today.
of discussion to our However,
knowledge, to there is a lack ofthere
our knowledge, scientific literature
is a lack reviews
of scientific literature re
about the transformation
views about of theMorocco’s
transformationfood of systems towards
Morocco’s food sustainability.
systems towards This work
sustainability. Th
aims to compile—in one to
work aims review paper—information
compile—in about food system
one review paper—information transformation
about food system transfo
towards sustainability in the sustainability
mation towards world, focusing in theonworld,
Morocco’s
focusing keyondrivers,
Morocco’s interventions,
key drivers, interven
achievements,tions,
challenges, opportunities,
achievements, and opportunities,
challenges, outcomes. Globally, many food
and outcomes. systems
Globally, are food sy
many
tems are
already undergoing already
major undergoing major
transformations aimingtransformations aiming
for sustainability. Ourfor paper
sustainability.
showedOur pape
that Morocco’sshowed
driversthat Morocco’s
(climate change,drivers (climate change,
globalization, incomeglobalization, income growth and socio
growth and socio-economic
economic development, urbanization, population growth,
development, urbanization, population growth, policies, and socio-cultural traditions) policies, and socio-cultural
for tra
ditions) for food system transformation are not different
food system transformation are not different from those of the world. Morocco, in turn, is from those of the world. Mo
rocco, inefforts
furnishing remarkable turn, isinfurnishing
this regard, remarkable
despite the efforts in this
existing regard, despite
challenges; the existing
the inability to cha
lenges; the inability to effectively address the detrimental
effectively address the detrimental effects of climate change and escalating water scarcity effects of climate change an
was identified as the fundamental cause of this vulnerability. Additionally, COVID-19
has added pressure on African food systems. A meaningful sustainability transition is
guided and carried out at the institutional, policy, and programmatic levels, resulting
in many achievements. However, there are conflicting views on the outcomes of food
system transformation. Some studies showed that Morocco has achieved notable successes
in increasing export production and reducing poverty to less than 5% of the population,
particularly over the past decade; the proportion of wasted and malnourished children has
declined from 25 to 15% and 4 to 3%, respectively, in this country. The 2023 GHIs showed
a score of 9.0, which suggests that Hunger is low in Morocco. Other studies showed that
North Africa has entered a food security crisis. Specifically, food inflation has reached
unprecedented levels in Morocco, Tunisia, and Algeria since the Arab Spring civil unrest
a decade ago. It was argued that, despite the positive results achieved by food system
developments over the last three decades, the associated rapid structural transformations
have increased challenges with potentially wide-reaching consequences regarding the
World 2024, 5 641
condition of nutrition and food security. So, it is time to redouble efforts to overcome
the challenges of developing food systems towards sustainability, both in Morocco and
globally. This paper provides precious insights, enabling policy makers and planners to
design evidence-based policies and strategies and contribute to the advancement of current
knowledge in this field, not only eliminating hunger and malnutrition, but also stimulating
sustainable development in Morocco.
References
1. El Bilali, H.; Callenius, C.; Strassner, C.; Probst, L. Food and nutrition security and sustainability transitions in food systems. Food
Energy Secur. 2019, 8, e00154. [CrossRef]
2. FAO. Policy Brief: Food Security. 2006. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/faoitaly/documents/pdf/
pdf_Food_Security_Cocept_Note.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2022).
3. Garcia-Oliveira, P.; Fraga-Corral, M.; Carpena, M.; Prieto, M.A.; Simal-Gandara, J. Approaches for sustainable food production
and consumption systems. Future Foods 2022, 23–38. [CrossRef]
4. World Bank. Food Security Update. 2022. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/food-
security-update (accessed on 6 February 2023).
5. Webb, P.; Benton, T.G.; Beddington, J.; Flynn, D.; Kelly, N.M.; Thomas, S.M. The urgency of food system transformation is now
irrefutable. Nat. Food 2020, 1, 584–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. UN. Food Systems Summit x SDGs. New York, NY, USA, 2021. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/food-systems-
summit/sdgs (accessed on 10 December 2022).
7. Merghani, S.A. Sustainable Business Models Implementation in Industry: Strategies and Challenges—A Systematic Review.
In Remote Work and Sustainable Changes for the Future of Global Business; Ali, M., Ed.; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2021;
pp. 237–261. [CrossRef]
8. El Ghmari, H.; Harbouze, R.; El Bilali, H. Pathways of Transition to Organic Agriculture in Morocco. World 2022, 3, 718–735.
[CrossRef]
9. Dupouy, E.; Gurinovic, M. Sustainable food systems for healthy diets in Europe and Central Asia: Introduction to the special
issue. Food Policy 2020, 96, 101952. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10. FAO. Sustainable Food Systems—Concept and Framework. 2018. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/ca2079en/CA207
9EN.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2022).
11. Johns Hopkins University; Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN). The Food Systems Dashboard. 2023. Available online:
https://www.foodsystemsdashboard.org (accessed on 2 January 2024).
12. Parsons, K.; Hawkes, C.; Wells, R. What Is the Food System? A Food Policy Perspective. Centre for Food Policy: London, UK,
2019. Available online: https://www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/570442/7643_Brief-2_What-is-the-food-system-
A-food-policy-perspective_WEB_SP.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2022).
13. GLOPAN. Food Systems and Diets: Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century. London, UK, 2016. Available online: http:
//ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll5/id/5516/filename/5517.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2022).
14. HLPE. Nutrition and Food Systems. A Report by HLPE on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security.
Rome, Italy, 2017. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7846e.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2022).
15. Gómez, M.I.; Ricketts, K.D. Food value chain transformations in developing countries: Selected hypotheses on nutritional
implications. Food Policy 2013, 42, 139–150. [CrossRef]
16. Turner, C.; Aggarwal, A.; Walls, H.; Herforth, A.; Drewnowski, A.; Coates, J.; Kalamatianou, S.; Kadiyala, S. Concepts and
critical perspectives for food environment research: A global framework with implications for action in low- and middle-income
countries. Glob. Food Secur. 2018, 18, 93–101. [CrossRef]
17. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Building Climate Resilience for Food Security
and Nutrition; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018.
18. FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. In Transforming Food Systems for Food
Security, Improved Nutrition and Affordable Healthy Diets for All; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. [CrossRef]
19. FAO. Vers une Agriculture et une Alimentation Durables au Maroc dans le Cadre du Programme de Développement Durable à
l’Horizon 2030—Diagnostic Rapide de la Durabilité de l’Agriculture au Maroc. FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017. Available online: https:
//www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/FAO-countries/Maroc/docs/Document_maroc_lowres_I7442FR_1_07.17.pdf (accessed
on 10 December 2022).
20. UN. Revision of World Urbanization Prospects; UN: New York, NY, USA, 2018. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/desa/20
18-revision-world-urbanization-prospects (accessed on 12 December 2022).
21. Balineau, G.; Bauer, A.; Kessler, M.; Madariaga, N. Food Systems in Africa: Rethinking the Role of Markets; Africa Development
Forum; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2021.
World 2024, 5 642
22. Smith, M.R.; Myers, S.S. Impact of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on global human nutrition. Nat. Clim. Change 2018, 8, 834–839.
[CrossRef]
23. FAO. Climate Change and Food Systems: Global Assessments and Implications for Food Security and Trade. FAO of UN. 2015.
Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4332e.pdf (accessed on 12 December 2022).
24. Baker, P.; Kay, A.; Walls, H. Trade and investment liberalization and Asia’s non-communicable disease epidemic: A synthesis of
data and existing literature. Glob. Health 2014, 10, 66. [CrossRef]
25. Thow, A.M. Trade liberalisation and the nutrition transition: Mapping the pathways for public health nutritionists. Public Health
Nutr. 2009, 12, 2150–2158. [CrossRef]
26. Thow, A.M.; Nisbett, N. Trade, nutrition, and sustainable food systems. Lancet 2019, 394, 716–718. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Popkin, B.M. Global nutrition dynamics: The world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with non-communicable diseases.
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 84, 289–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Blecher, E.; Liber, A.C.; Drope, J.M.; Nguyen, B.; Stoklosa, M. Global Trends in the Affordability of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages,
1990–2016. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2017, 14, 160406. [CrossRef]
29. Imamura, F.; Micha, R.; Khatibzadeh, S.; Fahimi, S.; Shi, P.; Powles, J.; Mozaffarian, D. Dietary quality among men and women in
187 countries in 1990 and 2010: A systematic assessment. Lancet Glob. Health 2015, 3, E132–E142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Mayén, A.L.; Marques-Vidal, P.; Paccaud, F.; Bovet, P.; Stringhini, S. Socioeconomic determinants of dietary patterns in low- and
middle-income countries: A systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 1520–1531. [CrossRef]
31. Qaim, M. Globalisation of agrifood systems and sustainable nutrition. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2017, 76, 12–21. [CrossRef]
32. IFPRI. Global Food Policy Report; IFPRI: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. [CrossRef]
33. Abdelradi, F.; Admassie, A.; Asafu-Adjaye, J.; Ayieko, M.; Badiane, O.; Glatzel, K.; Hendriks, S.; Mbaye, S.; Mengoub, F.E.;
Ramadan, R.; et al. Policy Options for Food Systems Transformation in Africa—From the Perspective of African Universities and Think
Tanks; Food Systems Summit Brief: New York, NY, USA, 2021. Available online: https://www.mamopanel.org/media/uploads/
files/FSS_Brief_Policy_Options_Food_Sytems_Transformation_Africa.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2022).
34. WHO. Fact Sheet: Healthy Diet; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-
sheets/detail/healthy-diet (accessed on 13 December 2022).
35. FAO; WHO. The Nutrition Challenge: Food Systems Solutions; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. Available online: https://
apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/277440/WHO-NMH-NHD-18.10eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on
13 December 2022).
36. WHO. Information Sheet: A Healthy Diet Sustainably Produced; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. Available online: https:
//www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-18.12 (accessed on 13 December 2022).
37. Afshin, A.; Sur, P.J.; Fay, K.A.; Cornaby, L.; Ferrara, G.; Salama, J.S.; Mullany, E.C.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abebe, Z.; et al.
Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
Lancet 2019, 393, 1958–1972. [CrossRef]
38. Mapnews. ONSSA Tient Son Conseil d’Administration. 2023. Available online: https://www.mapnews.ma/fr/actualites/
economie/l%E2%80%99onssa-tient-son-conseil-d%E2%80%99administration (accessed on 2 January 2024).
39. FAO. Morocco. Investing In Collective Action. Opportunities in Agrifood Cooperatives. 2018. Available online: http://www.fao.
org/3/ca1198en/CA1198EN.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2022).
40. World Bank. Morocco—Modernizing Irrigation Schemes for Agriculture Project. 2020. Available online: https://projects.
worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/project-detail/P169263 (accessed on 13 December 2022).
41. FAO. Morocco: Policy Support for Sustainable Food Systems Transformation. 2021. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/cb0
406en/cb0406en.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2022).
42. ADA. Missions. 2021. Available online: https://www.ada.gov.ma/fr/missions (accessed on 13 December 2022).
43. Malabo Montpellier Panel. Connecting the Dots: Policy Innovations for Food Systems Transformation in Africa; Malabo Montpellier
Panel: Dakar, Senegal, 2021.
44. ADA. Guide de l’Investisseur dans le Secteur Agricole au Maroc; Ministère de l’Agriculture, de la Pêche Maritime, du Développement
Rural, des Eaux et Forêts: Rabat, Morocco, 2018. Available online: https://www.ada.gov.ma/sites/default/files/Guide-
Investisseur-ADA/Guide_Investisseur%20FR.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2022).
45. FDA. Les Aides Financières de l’État pour la Promotion des Investissements Agricoles; Ministère de l’Agriculture, de la Pêche Maritime,
du Développement Rural, des Eaux et Forêts: Rabat, Morocco, 2019.
46. EcoActu. Fonds de Développement Agricole. 2021. Available online: https://www.ecoactu.ma/fonds-de-developpement-
agricole-2021/ (accessed on 13 December 2022).
47. Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances. Central Guarantee Fund; Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances: Rabat, Morocco,
2020. Available online: https://www.finances.gov.ma/en/The_Ministry/Pages/Central-Guarantee-Fund.aspx (accessed on
13 December 2022).
48. FAO; ADA. Innovations for Inclusive Agricultural Finance and Risk Mitigation Mechanisms, the Case of Tamwil El Fellah in Morocco;
FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016.
49. FAO; AFRACA. Agricultural Value Chain Finance Innovations and Lessons: Case Studies in Africa; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020. Available
online: https://www.fao.org/3/ca6345en/ca6345en.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2022).
World 2024, 5 643
50. GCAM. Modèle Economique Marocain au Service du Monde Agricole et Rural; Groupe Crédit Agricole du Maroc: Rabat,
Morroco, 2016.
51. World Group Bank. Maghreb: Policy Engagement for Resilient and Inclusive Agrifood Systems. Available online: https:
//documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099062724124512633/pdf/P1799651be5f35051b34a18377bda67bd8.pdf (accessed on
10 June 2024).
52. Chambre de Commerce et d’Industrie et de Services Région Laâyoune—Sakia El Hamra. 2024. Available online:
https://www.ccislaayoune.ma/ccislaayoune/en/blog/the-national-agency-for-the-promotion-of-employment-and-skills-
your-partner-in-developing-skills-and-enhancing-career-opportunities/?cn-reloaded=1 (accessed on 10 June 2024).
53. ADS. Présentation. 2021. Available online: https://social.gov.ma/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Maroc-Tamkine-Fr.pdf (ac-
cessed on 13 December 2022).
54. Verner, D.; Tréguer, D.; Redwood, J.; Christensen, J.; Mcdonnell, R.; Elbert, C.; Konishi, Y.; Belghazi, S. Climate Variability, Drought,
and Drought Management in Morocco’s Agricultural Sector; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [CrossRef]
55. OECD; FAO; UNCDF. Adopting a Territorial Approach to Food Security and Nutrition Policy; OECD: Paris, France, 2016. [CrossRef]
56. Ministère de l’Agriculture, de la Pêche Maritime, du Développement Rural et des Eaux et Forêts. Nouvelle Stratégie Agricole;
Ministère de l’Agriculture, de la Pêche Maritime, du Développement Rural et des Eaux et Forêts: Rabat, Morocco, 2018.
57. Mouahidi, K.A. Morocco Green Generation Program-for-Results: Funding Approval; World Bank Group 850 (IBRD)/International
Development Organization/International Development Association: Bonn, Germany, 2021. Available online: https://www.gtai.
de/gtai-de/trade/entwicklungsprojekte/marokko/verbesserung-des-agrarsektors-596710 (accessed on 16 December 2022).
58. Mouahidi, K.A. Morocco Launches “Green Generation 2020–2030”, a New Farming Development Strategy. Medafrica Times.
2020. Available online: https://medafricatimes.com/19464-morocco-launches-green-generation-2020-2030-a-new-farming-
development-strategy.html (accessed on 16 December 2022).
59. Al-Awsat, A. Morocco Achieves 83% of its Sea Fishing Development Plan. 2019. Available online: https://english.aawsat.com/
home/article/1603271/morocco-achieves-83-its-sea-fishing-development-plan (accessed on 16 December 2022).
60. IFAD; ILO. Country Brief: Morocco Young Women’s Employment and Empowerment in the Rural Economy; International Labor Organi-
zation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/documents/
publication/wcms_622767.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2022).
61. Toumi, L. Sustainable food security in Morocco: Challenges & opportunities. AGROFOR Int. J. 2016, 1, 30–40. [CrossRef]
62. Ministère de la Santé. La Stratégie Nationale de la Nutrition 2011–2019; Ministère de la Santé: Rabat, Morocco, 2011. Available
online: https://www.sante.gov.ma/Publications/Guides-Manuels/Documents/Couv%20Strat%C3%A9die%20de%20Nutrition.
pdf (accessed on 16 December 2022).
63. Ministère de la Jeunesse et des Sports. Stratégies Nationale Intégrée de la Jeunesse 2015–2030; Ministère de la Jeunesse et des
Sports: Rabat, Morocco, 2014. Available online: http://www.transnational-corridors.com/files/Transnational%20Corridors/
Downloads/File_1_319.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2022).
64. INDH. Initiative Nationale pour le Développement Humain. 2023. Available online: https://www.maroc.ma/fr/content/indh
(accessed on 2 January 2024).
65. Inter-Réseaux. The Green Morocco Plan: The Major Principles and Advances of Morocco’s Agricultural Strategy; Inter-Réseaux
Développement Rural and SOS Faim: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2016. Available online: https://www.inter-reseaux.org/wp-content/
uploads/bds_no20_plan_maroc_vert_en.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2022).
66. L’Economiste. PMV: Comment la Région a Valorisé ses Filières Agricoles. 2013. Available online: https://www.leconomiste.com/
article/913655-plan-maroc-vert-comment-la-r-gion-valoris-sesfili-res-agricoles (accessed on 16 December 2022).
67. ADA. Accompagnement dans la Mise en Ouvre des Projets Agricoles. 2024. Available online: https://www.ada.gov.ma/fr/
accompagnement-dans-la-mise-en-oeuvre-des-projets-agricoles (accessed on 10 June 2024).
68. Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche Maritime. Projet de Loi de Finance au Titre de l’Exercice Budgétaire; Projet Ministériel
de Performance du Département de l’Agriculture: Rabat, Morocco, 2016. Available online: https://lof.finances.gov.ma/sites/
default/files/budget/files/pmp_dep_agriculture_2016_fr.pdf (accessed on 16 December 2022).
69. Challenge. Mécanisation Agricole: Le PMV Tracte la Mécanisation Agricole. 2016. Available online: http://www.challenge.ma/
mecanisationagricole-le-pmv-tracte-la-mecanisation-agricole-67747/ (accessed on 16 December 2022).
70. ADA. Investor’s Guide in the Agricultural Sector in Morocco; Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Rural Development, Water and
Forests: Rabat, Morocco, 2016.
71. Sadiki, P.M. La Rareté de L’eau: Défis et Opportunités, Cas du Secteur Agricole au Maroc. Séminaire de Haut-Niveau, « Rareté
de L2019eau: Défis et Opportunités ». Rome, Italy, 2017. Available online: https://www.ciheam.org/uploads/attachments/623/
WaterScarcity_ACEA_FAO_CIHEAM_17112017_Intervention_Mohammed_Sadiki_VP_CIHEAM.pdf (accessed on 16 December
2022).
72. Dispositif de Promotion de l‘Emploi en Milieu Rural, Promotion de l’Emploi des Jeunes en Milieu Rural (PEJ), Unités Mobiles pour
l’Employabilité en Milieu Rural (UMER). Casablanca, Morocco, 2020. Available online: https://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/33
958.html (accessed on 16 December 2022).
73. GIZ. Promotion de l’Emploi des Jeunes en Milieu Rural (PEJ II). 2021. Available online: https://prospera-consulting.com/project/
employment-and-labour-market-analysis-morocco/promotion-de-lemploi-des-jeunes-en-milieu-rural-pej-ii/ (accessed on
16 December 2022).
World 2024, 5 644
74. Salhi, A.; Benabdelouahab, T.; Martin-Vide, J.; Okacha, A.; El Hasnaoui, Y.; El Mousaoui, M.; El Morabit, A.; Himi, M.;
Benabdelouahab, S.; Lebrini, Y.; et al. The Gap of Perception Is the Only Way to Align Soil Protection Actions. Sci. Total Environ.
2020, 718, 137421. [CrossRef]
75. FAO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Transforming Food Systems for Affordable Healthy Diets; FAO: Rome,
Italy, 2020.
76. Lagrini, K.; Ghafiri, A.; Ouali, A.; Elrhaz, K.; Feddoul, R.; Elmoutaki, S. Application of Geographical Information System (GIS) for
the development of Climatological Air Temperature Vulnerability Maps: An Example from Morocco. Meteorol. Appl. 2020, 27,
e1871. [CrossRef]
77. HCP. Agriculture 2030. Quels Avenirs pour Le Maroc? HCP: Rabat, Morocco, 2007.
78. Srairi, M.T. Rethinking the Agricultural Development Model in Morocco in the Post COVID-19 Era. Cah. Agric. 2021, 30, 1–9.
79. El Ghmari, H.; Harbouze, R.; El Bilali, H. Transition to organic agriculture in Morocco. AGROFOR Int. J. 2021, 6, 5–14. [CrossRef]
80. World Bank Group. Future of Food: Harnessing Digital Technologies to Improve Food System Outcomes; World Bank: Washington, DC,
USA, 2019. Available online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/31565/Future-of-Food-Harnessing-
Digital-Technologies-to-Improve-Food-System-Outcomes.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 17 December 2022).
81. Saidi, A.; Diouri, M. Food self-sufficiency under the Green-Morocco Plan. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci. 2017, 5, 33–40. [CrossRef]
82. El Youssfi, L.; Doorsamy, W.; Aghzar, A.; Cherkaoui, S.I.; Elouadi, I.; Faundez, A.G.; Salazar, D.R. Review of water energy food
nexus in Africa: Morocco and South Africa as case studies. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 183, 2002. [CrossRef]
83. IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies). The Impact of the Conflict in Ukraine as a Crisis
Multiplier in the Middle East and North Africa. 2022. Available online: https://www.ifrc.org/sites/default/files/2022-06/
impact-ukraine-conflict-mena-EN_1.pdf (accessed on 17 December 2022).
84. Benchanna, I. Le Maroc s’Engage dans la Voie des Systèmes Alimentaires Durables. 2021. Available online: https://www.lavieeco.
com/economie/le-maroc-sengage-dans-la-voie-des-systemes-alimentaires (accessed on 17 December 2022).
85. El Bilali, H.; Ben Hassen, T. Regional Agriculture and Food Systems Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of the Near East
and North Africa Region. Foods 2024, 13, 297. [CrossRef]
86. Bahn, R.A.; Yehya, A.A.K.; Zurayk, R. Digitalization for Sustainable Agri-Food Systems: Potential, Status, and Risks for the
MENA Region. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3223. [CrossRef]
87. Trendov, N.M.; Varas, S.; Zeng, M. Digital Technologies in Agriculture and Rural Areas-Status Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019.
Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/ca4985en/ca4985en.pdf (accessed on 18 December 2022).
88. De’, R.; Pandey, N.; Pal, A. Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice. Int. J. Inf.
Manag. 2020, 55, 102171. [CrossRef]
89. Tanchum, M. The Fragile State of Food Security in the Maghreb: Implication of the 2021 Cereal Grains Crisis in Tunisia, Algeria,
and Morocco. 2021. Available online: https://www.mei.edu/ (accessed on 18 December 2022).
90. Von Grebmer, K.; Bernstein, J.; Alders, R.; Dar, O.; Kock, R.; Rampa, F.; Wiemers, M.; Acheampong, K.; Hanano, A.; Higgins,
B.; et al. Annex E: 2000, 2006, 2012, and 2020 Global Hunger Index Scores, 2020. 2020 Global Hunger Index: One Decade to Zero
Hunger—Linking Health and Sustainable Food Systems 2020. Available online: https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/pdf/2020
-global-hunger-index.pdf/ (accessed on 18 December 2022).
91. GHI. Global Hunger Index 2023: Morocco 2023. Available online: https://www.globalhungerindex.org/pdf/en/2023/Morocco.
pdf (accessed on 13 July 2024).
92. Ait Ali, A.; Dadush, U.; Mengoub, F.Z.; Tsakok, I. The Russia-Ukraine War and Food Security in Morocco. Policy Brief.
2022. Available online: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/2022-05/PB_34-22_Tsakok%20EN.pdf (accessed on
18 December 2022).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.