Eng Proj Draft
Eng Proj Draft
PROJECT WORK
SUBJECT – ENGLISH
NAME- MALVIKA TIWARI
Lastly, I would also like to thank my friends and seniors who aided me in
giving shape to my assignment. I shall forever remain indebted to the
aforementioned people for helping me out, showing me the right
direction, and exhibiting patience, love, and respect toward me.
FEMALE FOETICIDE
Boys have traditionally been thought of as the family's "breadwinners" in terms of finances.
They have been responsible for finding employment and supporting their family. But girls
have consistently been seen as a financial burden, particularly during the marriage. Girls still
frequently marry at a relatively young age in India's rural areas. A global alliance called Girls
Not Brides, which seeks to prevent child marriage, reports that roughly 27% of Indian girls
get married before they turn 18 years old. When a girl marries, her parents are supposed to
give the groom's family a "dowry," which is essentially payment in the form of money, food,
home goods, and clothing. Dowries, according to Professor Ferus-Comelo, are "a profoundly
demeaning ritual. To some extent, it represents the fact that you must pay someone to take
your daughter. She said that the practise is still in use, but that there are many alternative
names and euphemisms for it. "Dowries are not necessarily termed 'dowries,' but sometimes
they are called 'gifts,'" she said. Daughters are expected to take on their husband’s last name
after marriage and relocate with their family to start their responsibilities in the home. As a
result, young females frequently lack the knowledge, self-assurance, and financial
independence necessary to make thoughtful choices regarding pregnancy and parenthood.
The political culture in India further exacerbates the perception that women should be treated
inferiorly. In the 1980s, political propaganda in India and the United States portrayed slogans
such as “Pay 5,000 now, save 50,000 later” directed towards South-Asian communities to
encourage them to pay the cost of sex-determination technology than having a daughter and
bearing an economic cost in the future. Professor Ferus-Comelo remarked that, “The same
ads, now decades later, have come back with the clinics offering the same possibilities, and it
shows that there is still a market for sex-selective abortions even in the United States.” She
also explained that the rise of the Hindu political right has furthered, “notions of womanhood
tied exclusively to the heteronormative wife and mother roles. This then restricts women’s
abilities to break out of these molds.”
A) Economic Factors:
Female Foeticide in the 21st century has a great deal to do with capitalist modernity. There
are aspects of it lying behind these phenomena.
i) For rural households with landed property there is a clear inverse correlation between the
income level and child sex ratio. It is especially evident in south India. Again there is a
gender-based wage level. For the same work, females are paid less remuneration. In most
cases women enter domestic non-paid services which a patriarchal society gives little or no
value at all, so they are regarded as liabilities than assets.
ii) Cultural politics of dowry in Indian society have a lot of answers for this pernicious
phenomenon. Since the turn of the century, the recorded dowry deaths are increasing. Nearly
7- 8000 per year brides are murdered for the lack of full payment of dowry. Nearly 3-5000
brides are committing suicide for dowry. Brides are thought of as commodities and the pre-
marriage and marriage have been described as ‘consumption-oriented reproductive journey.
When the reproductive practices make daughters into such an economic burden, the threat of
having to amass dowry is motive enough to dispose of female commodities. (Barbara
Harriss-White, 2009)
iii) Female foeticide has been commodified. It has started to become a field of accumulation
in its own right. Malini Bhattachgarya, a member of the national commission for women,
admitted that in the era of liberalization “one has to allow freedom of choice to the service
seeker and the freedom to sell by the service provider”. Foeticide may cost one or two
months’ earnings, while dowry requires mobilisation of several years’ income. Hence there
appears equilibrium between the service seeker and provider. UNICEF estimates that the
turnover of the foeticide industry has now reached 244 million dollars from 77 million
dollars in 2006. (Barbara Harriss-White, 2009). Those who disapproved of the practice of
sex-selective abortions but engaged in it against their principles expressed their compulsions
and helplessness due to pressures arising out of unhealthy competition in the healthcare
service sector. It was said that if they did not provide abortion care services, some others
would have provided them (Tandon and Sharma, 2008).
B) Socio-ritual factors:
Females are vulnerable to brutalities of the male in the forms of physical, mental and sexual
assaults and traumas in the patriarchal societal structure of India. Females are subjugated,
condemned, and deprived in sphere of life. Every parent of a girl child is at risk for their
daughter in this patriarchal society for the mentioned causes. Again for the funeral
ceremonies of the parents, the presence of a son is a must. According to Manu, A man cannot
attain moksha (redemption) unless he has a son to light his funeral pyre. In old age, the sons
will care for them believably. These socio-rituals factors including illiteracy and orthodox
societal norms lead to cravings for a male baby, discarding the females one after another.
C) Technological factors:
Female foeticide is the latest trend of long-established gender bias. We are civilized with time
and our killing of female babies has also been civilized. The presence of low-cost
technologies like ultrasound has led to sex-based abortion of female foetuses, and an
increasingly smaller percentage of girls born each year (Jain, 2005)
D) Population Policy:
Indian family planning policies promote a two-child family and health workers say this often
leads to the abortion of female foetuses in efforts to have a "complete family" with at least
one son. (Sen, 2005)
Although abortion in India is legal, illegal abortions currently outnumber them because most
abortions in India are solely based on the fetal sex preference for boys. Almost ten women
die every day of unsafe, illegal abortions in India. According to India’s health ministry,
nearly half of abortions are conducted in hazardous and unhygienic conditions and are often
performed by untrained physicians or healthcare professionals.
Since sex determination tests are illegal within India, many women opt-in for diagnostic
testing (conducted illegally by gangs), take sex selection drugs (SSDs), or try “old-wives
tale” remedies to change the sex of the foetus after conception. Still, many women are
unaware that the foetus’s sex is determined during the fertilization of the egg by sperm and
cannot be changed after that. The mother donates an egg, which always contributes an X
chromosome to the fetus’s genome, while the father’s sperm can contribute either an X or a Y
chromosome. If the sperm contributes an X chromosome, the fetus will be a girl, while a Y
chromosome indicates that it will be a boy. Not only are many women uninformed about this
concept, but they take harmful drugs containing synthetic chemicals and heavy metals that
often result in congenital disabilities and stillbirths.
This fall in CSR indicates that during 1991-2001 there may be substantial female foeticide.
As the sex CSR declines, in near future overall sex ratio will do the same. This decline in the
sex ratio will badly hamper the social structure and the development process. This imbalance
would have serious repercussions for Indian society in the future, especially on the status of
women, leading to increased sexual violence including prostitution, trafficking, and the
reduced mobility of women. Recent reports in local media said young men in Punjab and
Haryana were finding it hard to find brides. Indira Gandhi, Mother Teresa, Kalpana Chawla
all these special names have one thing in common, “they were all women”. Killing the girl
child by making a pre-birth investigation is a social sin destroying the roots of Indian society.
And one will come when the females will be disappeared from the earth i.e. the human race
will also face extinction.
COVID-19 has exacerbated this issue as women are more likely to seek unsafe or illegal
abortion options since medical professionals and resources have been redirected to help
combat the pandemic. Even before the pandemic, domestic violence has been an immense
problem in India. In 2018, “Cruelty by Husband or His Relatives” accounted for 32% of all
crimes against women registered by the police amounting to over 100,000 cases. Due to
quarantine orders, women are more likely to be trapped with abusive partners or lack access
to contraception. Many Indian women who are victims of domestic violence have limited
education and are usually unable to be financially independent. They have inadequate options
and resources because they cannot turn to their parents due to social stigmas, or their parents
cannot take them in due to financial burdens. However, the future looks optimistic as more
organizations such as Shakti Shalini, Rise Up, and SNEHA Crisis Helpline are working to
provide health and sexual education to girls and women in India to inform them about safe
sex practices, contraception, and resources for domestic violence survivors.
REVIEW OF THE MEASURE TAKEN TO COMBAT FEMALE
FOETICIDES
In the modern period of Indian history, a number of measures have been taken to combat
female foeticides either as institutional measures or as individual initiatives.
A) Institutional measures:
1) PNDT (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act-1994: Maharashtra is the first state in
The country is to ban pre-natal sex determination through the enactment of the Maharashtra
regulation of prenatal diagnostics techniques act. Similar efforts at the national level resulted
in the
enactment of the Central pre-natal diagnostic techniques (Regulation and prevention of
misuse) Act 1994. The act has two aspects viz., regulatory and preventive. It seeks to regulate
the use of pre-natal diagnostic techniques for legal or medical purposes and prevent misuse
for illegal purposes. The act provides for the setting up of various bodies along with their
composition powers and functions. There is a central supervisory board, appropriate
authorities, and advisory committees. Violations of the PNDT Act carry a five-year jail term
and a fine of about 2,300 U.S. dollars.
2) The Supreme Court of India has issued notices to the Indian government and the states and
union territories on a petition seeking stricter implementation of laws that ban pre-natal sex
selection tests and sex-selective abortions in India. A concerned Supreme Court observed that
the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act
1994 (PCPNDT) which is meant to prevent female foeticide in India, has failed. The petition
brought to the court's attention the rampant practice of sex-selective abortions in many parts
of the country, with doctors indiscriminately conducting sex-determination tests and carrying
out abortions because of the lax implementation of the PCPNDT Act.
3) UNICEF is committed to protecting every child from violence, exploitation, abuse and
discrimination.
4) The government would declare January 24, 2010 as national girl child day with a focus
on targeting the scourges of female foeticide, domestic violence, and malnutrition.
SOLUTIONS
Professor Ferus-Comelo explained that as more young people become exposed to other
cultures and lifestyles, “people have higher expectations of one’s own culture.” She
continued to explain that, “there has been a very positive, inspiring awakening of women
when their worlds have been constrained, and they know there is greater potential.” The only
way to combat the issue of such a complex problem of female foeticide is to solve the root
causes: skewed political propaganda, and a lack of economic opportunities, and unenforced
legislation.
South Korea, which also faced a severely skewed sex-ratio, implemented solutions that have
shown promising results, and many Indian government officials are looking to emulate their
approach. They improved, enacted, and strictly enforced laws that prohibited female feticide,
encouraged and provided opportunities for more women to enter the labor force, and used the
media to mobilize support for their initiatives.
India should work to allocate more resources to better enforce the Prohibition of Sex
Selection Act. Although the government launched a similar campaign in 2015, it was
unsuccessful. To improve their efforts, experts recommend that the government should
charge doctors who conduct illegal sex determination testing with hefty fines and strengthen
detection for illegal clinics and services provided by gangs.
Most importantly, the government should promote women’s education, provide better
opportunities for women to enter the labor force, enable more women to serve political
positions, and enact equal inheritance laws. Furthermore, health education on domestic
violence awareness and safe sex practices should also be provided for men. Female education
is one of the most influential factors in reducing gender discrimination and sexual violence.
Studies prove that exposure to female leadership leads to a significant decrease in the gender
gap for educational attainment (32%). Moreover, introducing cable television to India’s rural
areas and playing shows that had strong female characters or women in power caused
preference for sons to decrease by 12% and school enrolment for children to increase by 5%.
If women have better access to quality education, they can have better opportunities to enter
the workforce and become financially independent. Professor Ferus-Comelo expressed that,
“economic independence leads to less discrimination. If girls and women had equal access to
wealth and income and legal inheritance rights, they could have a sense of economic
independence, then these kinds of norms are going to change.”