Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4
Solid waste management, or SWM, is a useful
instrument for analyzing effective environmental
management and good governance through administrators. Since all waste has a direct connection to people, plants, and animals, proper management reduces negative effects on human health and the environment and aids in resource conservation. However, the environment and sustainability have suffered greatly as a result of ineffective and unsustainable SWM practices, which have been exacerbated by unchecked urbanization, budgetary constraints, and a lack of research. In addition to the inadequate transportation and storage systems, the main methods of disposal are open burning, uncontrolled dumping, and landfills. Solid waste emissions lead to pollution and the release of leachate, a toxic liquor that reduces the environment and human health, among other things. Today's solid waste management requires technology and proactivity. (Lokhandwala et al., 2024) Waste is only considered waste if it is never examined again! The production of solid waste has been rising daily as global lifestyle changes and upgrades take hold. The environment, economy, and community health are all declining due to the increased rate of waste generation. These three factors are thought to be the main pillars of sustainability, and achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs) would be challenging without concentrating on managing solid waste. The achievement of the SDGs can be secured if the circular economy concept is integrated with efforts to manage solid waste. By emphasizing the 10Rs—refuse, rethink, reduce, reuse, repair, refurbish, remanufacture, repurpose, recycle, and recover—the circular economy seeks to minimize resource consumption. The management of solid waste through the application of the circular economy concept is the main topic of this chapter. (Salunke et al., 2024) As a result of their irreversible harm to human health and the environment, micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) have garnered increased attention in recent years due to their presence in water, soil, and the air. MNPs have been discovered in fresh water, the air we breathe, and a variety of marine animals and plants in recent studies. The primary cause of plastic's detection in various human organs and its correlation with diseases like cancer, metabolic disorders, neurological conditions, etc. is improper disposal of plastic waste. Still, there are issues with both the quantification and the identification of these particles. Furthermore, it is still unclear how exactly plastic particles behave when they enter the bodies of people and other animals. Therefore, we begin this chapter by defining MNPs. (De Freitas et al., 2024) The global pollutants known as microplastics (MPs) or nanoplastics (NPs) are becoming more prevalent and are attracting a lot of attention because they may pose a threat to the ecosystem due to their persistence and accumulation. Mechanical abrasion, photochemical oxidation, and biological degradation are the processes that turn larger plastic waste into microplastics (microplastics, 1-4 mm) and nanoplastics (nanoplastics, 1-1000 nm). Because of their unique physiochemical nanoscale characteristics, NPs might be riskier and more dangerous than MPs. On the other hand, not much has been written about the fate of NPs in the environment, their effects on ecosystems, and potential dangers. This chapter offers a comprehensive overview of the current state of NP research through an extensive bibliometric analysis. We conducted a thorough search of the Web of Science Core Collection scientific database, covering the period from 2004 to 2022. The results showed that the number of papers on NPs has significantly increased since 2014. This chapter provides a critical assessment of the current state of affairs, emphasizing risk management techniques, environmental behavior, and the fate of nanoplastics in the environment and the ensuing ecological toxicity. The entire ecosystem—which includes the ocean, groundwater, freshwater, soil, and air—is the focus of more research. To fully comprehend the sources, additional efforts have been made to investigate the aging and aggregation of NPs in environmentally relevant settings. Lastly, NP research's present difficulties and potential directions are explored. (Gulati et al., 2024) To ensure that future generations have access to clean air, water, and soil, bioremediation can assist in reducing and eliminating the pollution that humans produce. This is summed up in our policy briefing on food security: pollution harms our health and the environment, affecting wildlife and the sustainability of our planet. The process of biologically degrading organic wastes under controlled conditions—usually to a state of innocuousness or concentration levels that stay within specific concentration limits set forth by the controlling authority—is known as bioremediation. Ex situ and in situ bioremediation are both feasible, depending on a variety of variables including the kind and amount of contaminants, the site's features, cost, and/or other factors. Ex situ therefore typically costs more than in situ because excavation includes extra costs, ex situ is typically more expensive than in situ. The most practical and affordable method of cleaning up a contaminated site is using biological processes. While bioremediation is not a novel technique, our comprehension of its underlying mechanisms is expanding, allowing us to apply it more skillfully. Bioremediation has both technical and financial benefits, but it can occasionally take longer to finish than conventional methods. It typically uses fewer resources and less energy than conventional technologies and doesn't produce waste products that can be hazardous. (Kundu et al., 2024)