2023 AGU Poster
2023 AGU Poster
2023 AGU Poster
80
70
60
50
40
30
probability of exceedance. damaged. This is over 59% of the total number of buildings in the scenario.
109 RES1 FIA three or more floors, no basement, Structure, A-Zone 111 RES1 FIA split level, no basement, Structure, A-Zone
There are an estimated 450 buildings that will be completely destroyed. Of
Within the FEMA, the Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration (FIMA), Depth, duration, and water velocity in the floodplain are the primary factors $172 million in Wastewater Facilities, there would be 29.5% damaged or
formerly known as the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA), is responsible contributing to flood losses. Hazus Flood Model estimates flood losses from $51 million in Wastewater Facility losses.
for administering the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). FIA created the depth of flooding, assumes max duration, and does not estimate losses
riverine flooding DDFs. The original damage functions, developed in 1970 and due to high-velocity flash floods. Using the flood frequency convention, The Building $1.879 billion, Content $3.102 billion, and Inventory $358
1973, are called “theoretical base tables”. Some information used to develop flood hazard is defined by a relation between the depth of flooding and the million losses add up Capital Stock losses to $5.339 billion, a Building loss
the initial functions came from post-flood surveys conducted by the USACE. annual chance of inundation greater than that depth. The relation is called a ratio of 3.5%. When adding the Relocation, Capital-Related, Wage, and
With time, a wealth of damage and loss data was collected as part of the flood depth-frequency curve. Rental Income losses, the total Economic Loss for Buildings is $12.031
insurance claims process. Losses included structure and contents losses and billion for the 46th U.S. Congressional region risk assessment simulated
were determined relative to actual cash value (depreciated replacement cost). To compute the synthetic stream network, we used 1” DEM with a drainage with a 500-year riverine flood hazard.
A majority of claims were for residential structures. A statistical credibility area of 10 sq mi. Santa Ana River from Prado Dam to the Pacific Ocean is
analysis combined the “theoretical base tables” and the insurance claims. correctly identified by this coarse DEM, 1” ~ cos(lat)*30 m pixel resolution.
When a sufficient number of claims existed to provide statistical confidence, Hydrologically, the main-stem reaches have known discharges at all 8 Acknowledgement
the damage relationships were based exclusively on the claims data. When return periods, while more minor reaches used the specific hydrological The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the US
claims data were insufficient, the claims data and base tables were combined region’s regression equations. Hydraulics are calculated using Manning’s Department of Education award number P116Z220190, “Earth Systems
using a weighting process. equation, using the prevalent n for the reach taken from the NLCD buffered Science and Data Solutions Lab (EssDs): Applying Data Science
¼ mi around the reach centerline. Techniques to Achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals”.