LV Task 2 Plagiarism Report 1

PLAGIARISM SCAN REPORT
Date 2024-04-14
0% 100%
Words 1000
Plagiarised Unique
Characters 6701
Content Checked For Plagiarism
INTRODUCTION
The case of Chandan vs. The State (Delhi Admin.) delves into a harrowing tale of a fatal stabbing incident that unfolded on
28th May 1993, leading to the tragic death of the victim, Rakesh. The accused, Chandan, stands at the center of this legal
saga, accused of perpetrating the heinous crime by stabbing the deceased multiple times with a knife before fleeing the
scene. The prosecution's case heavily relies on the testimony of a crucial eyewitness, PW-2, who vividly recounts the
sequence of events leading to the fatal confrontation between the accused and the deceased.At the heart of the legal
proceedings lies the prosecution's endeavour to establish the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt, despite the
absence of a discernible motive for the crime. The recovery of the blood-stained murder weapon from the accused,
coupled with forensic evidence linking the weapon to the victim, serves as a cornerstone of the prosecution's case.
The Trial Court and the Appellate Court meticulously examined the evidence presented, ultimately affirming the conviction
of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellate review process underscored the significance of
direct evidence and the credibility of eyewitness testimony in substantiating the prosecution's claims and ensuring justice
is served in cases of grave criminal offences.
This case encapsulates the intricate legal intricacies involved in criminal trials, emphasizing the critical role of evidence,
witness testimonies, and judicial scrutiny in adjudicating matters of profound societal impact.
FACTS OF THE CASE

1. On the fateful day, at around 8:15 pm, the deceased Rakesh and the accused Chandan were seen grappling with each
other by a witness, PW-2, who was the sister-in-law of the deceased.
2. During the altercation, Chandan stabbed Rakesh multiple times with a knife he was carrying. The injuries inflicted on
Rakesh included incised stab wounds on various parts of his body, such as the clavicular area, left nipple, left arm, and back
of the left arm.
3. Following the attack, Rakesh was rushed to Hindu Rao hospital for emergency treatment but was declared dead upon
arrival. A post-mortem examination revealed the extent of the injuries sustained by Rakesh.
4. The police apprehended Chandan shortly after the incident at Hamilton Road. He was found carrying a blood-stained
knife and wearing a blood-stained shirt. The knife recovered from Chandan matched the blood of the deceased, further
implicating him in the crime.
5. The prosecution presented 18 witnesses during the trial, with PW-2 being the star witness. Despite a lengthy cross-
examination, PW-2's testimony remained credible and detailed, providing a firsthand account of the stabbing incident.
6. While the defence argued that no motive was established for Chandan's actions, the courts emphasized that in cases
with reliable eye-witness testimony, the absence of a motive does not undermine the credibility of the witness.
7. Ultimately, both the Trial Court and the Appellate Court upheld Chandan's conviction under Section 302 of IPC based on
the compelling evidence presented by the prosecution, including the eyewitness testimony and the recovery of the murder
weapon.
ISSUES RAISED
1. Weather was the central issue in the case of Chandan vs. The State (Delhi Admin.) regarding the accused's culpability?
2. Weather the reliability of eyewitness testimony played a significant role in the legal proceedings of the case?
Page 1 of 2
3. Weather there was a contention regarding the lack of a clear motive for the crime, and how did it impact the case?
4. Weather any concerns were raised about evidence collection and the investigative procedures followed in the case?
5. Weather legal precedents and the appellate review process influenced the arguments presented by the prosecution and
the defence in the case?
CONTENTIONS OF APPELLANT
1. The defence argued that the prosecution failed to establish a clear motive for Chandan to commit the crime. Despite the
absence of a motive, the defence contended that this should raise doubts about Chandan's culpability.
2. There were concerns raised about the manner in which the knife was recovered from Chandan. The defence questioned
the validity of the knife recovery process, suggesting potential discrepancies in the evidence collection.
3. While acknowledging the presence of an eyewitness (PW-2) who provided an account of the incident, the defence have
challenged the reliability of the eyewitness testimony. This could include questioning the credibility or consistency of the
witness's statements.
4. The defence have raised concerns about the speed of the investigation, highlighting the quick succession of events
leading to Chandan's arrest and the recovery of the knife. This could suggest a rushed investigation process that may have
overlooked crucial details.
5. It is likely that the appellant sought acquittal based on the contention that the prosecution's evidence, including the
eyewitness account and the recovered knife, was insufficient to prove Chandan's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
CONTENTIONS OF RESPONDENT
1. The prosecution emphasized the presence of a reliable eyewitness, PW-2, who provided a detailed and credible account
of the incident. The respondent argued that the eyewitness testimony, coupled with other evidence, directly implicated
Chandan in the murder of Rakesh.
2. The respondent highlighted the forensic evidence, such as the matching of the deceased's blood with that found on the
knife recovered from Chandan. This forensic link between the weapon and the victim's blood strengthened the case
against the appellant.
3. Building on legal precedents, the respondent argued that the absence of a clear motive should not undermine the
credibility of the eyewitness testimony when direct evidence establishes the crime. The respondent contended that motive
becomes less significant in cases with reliable eyewitnesses.
4. The prosecution have asserted that the investigation was thorough and that the evidence, including the recovery of the
murder weapon and the arrest of Chandan, was conducted in a timely and efficient manner. This comprehensive
investigation supported the case against the appellant.
5. The respondent supported the Trial Court's decision to convict Chandan under Section 302 of IPC, emphasizing that the
evidence presented during the trial, including eyewitness testimony and forensic findings, conclusively proved Chandan's
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
Matched Source
No plagiarism found
Page 2 of 2

LV Task 2 Plagiarism Report 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LV Task 2 Plagiarism Report 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LV Task 2 Plagiarism Report 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PLAGIARISM SCAN REPORT

Content Checked For Plagiarism

FACTS OF THE CASE

You might also like