Governor Abbott Amicus Letter

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

FILED

24-0884
10/21/2024 8:43 AM
tex-93359639
SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

G OVERNOR G REG ABBOTT


J AMES P. S ULLIVAN (512) 936-3306
General Counsel james.sullivan@gov.texas.gov

October 20, 2024


Via E-Filing
Mr. Blake Hawthorne, Clerk
Supreme Court of Texas
Re: No. 24-0884, In re Texas House of Representatives

Dear Mr. Hawthorne:

In his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the State, Governor


Greg Abbott submits this letter brief as amicus curiae supporting TDCJ
in the above-captioned case.*

The Texas Constitution’s Separation-of-Powers Clause provides


that no branch “shall exercise any power properly attached to either of
the others, except in the instances herein expressly permitted.” TEX.
CONST. art. II, § 1. The power to grant clemency in a capital case,
including a 30-day reprieve, is vested in the Governor alone. TEX. CONST.
art. IV, § 11(b).

In this case, however, actions by a single committee of a single


chamber of the Legislature have had the effect, both legally and factually,
of granting (at least) a 90-day reprieve. Indeed, the House Committee on
Criminal Jurisprudence conceded as much in its response brief field
earlier today. See Response at 3 (noting that the relief it sought and
obtained “slowed [TDCJ] in performing an execution”); see also
@SupremeCourtTX, X (Oct. 17, 2024), https://x.com/SupremeCourt_TX/
status/1847107820899971266 (announcing this Court’s order “effectively
halting the execution of Robert Roberson”). Unless the Court rejects that
tactic, it can be repeated in every capital case, effectively rewriting the
Constitution to reassign a power given only to the Governor.

* No fee was paid or will be paid for preparing this brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 11(c).

POST OFFICE BOX 12428 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 512-463-2000 (VOICE) DIAL 7-1-1 FOR RELAY SERVICES

Copy from re:SearchTX


Here, the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence has stepped
out of line. The Legislative Branch is supposed to move first, as Justice
Young correctly acknowledged, by “defin[ing] crimes and authoriz[ing]
punishments.” In re Texas House of Representatives, No. 24-0884, slip op.
at 1 (Tex. Oct. 17, 2024) (Young, J., joined by Hecht, C.J., & Huddle, J.,
concurring). Next, the Judicial Branch can order the execution of a death
sentence under those criminal laws—bringing its role to an end. See, e.g.,
Vandyke v. State, 538 S.W.3d 561, 572 (Tex. Crim. App. 2017)
(“Consistent with the constitutional provision that prohibits any one
branch of the government from exercising control over any other branch,
we have long recognized that this Court has no power to control nor right
to review the Governor’s exercise of his clemency power.”).

At that point, the Governor has the ultimate authority to grant a


30-day reprieve, or some other form of clemency. See, e.g., Ex parte Gore,
4 S.W.2d 38, 39 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928) (“[T]he power to parole, to pardon,
etc., is one confided by our Constitution to the Governor of this state, over
whose discretion in such matters this court has no control or right of
review.”). Nowhere does the Constitution even impliedly suggest—much
less “expressly permit” as the Separation-of-Powers Clause requires—
that the Legislative Branch can cut in again at the end.

If the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence thinks itself


entitled to testimony from a criminal on death row, a point which is not
conceded, it could have done so without erasing the authority given
exclusively to the Governor. Robert Roberson was convicted over two
decades ago. His claim under Article 11.073 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure—the supposed point of hearing his legislative testimony—was
rejected by the Court of Criminal Appeals over a year ago. And his
execution date was set months ago. In all that time, even when it was
clear that Roberson’s execution date was nearing and the Article 11.073
issue was manifest, the House Committee could not trouble itself with
seeking Roberson’s testimony. Only at the eleventh hour, when the
Constitution empowers the Governor to make the last move, did the
House Committee decide to violate the Separation-of-Powers Clause.

“The Governor shall have the power to grant one reprieve in any
capital case for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days . . . .” TEX. CONST.
art. IV, § 11(b) (emphasis added). Nobody other than the Governor, in
2

Copy from re:SearchTX


any branch of this State’s government, can exercise that constitutional
clemency power. Not the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence.
Not the 53rd Judicial District Court of Travis County. Not the Court of
Criminal Appeals. Not even the Supreme Court of Texas.

The Court should dismiss the House Committee’s petition for lack
of jurisdiction. There is no reason to delay. At a minimum, though, the
Court should immediately vacate the temporary injunction, which rests
on a subpoena that, on its face, was not signed by the officer required by
law. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 301.024(a); H.R. 1, § 13, 88th Leg., at 13
(2023).

Respectfully submitted.
/s/ James P. Sullivan
JAMES P. SULLIVAN
General Counsel
Texas Bar No. 24070702
james.sullivan@gov.texas.gov
TREVOR W. EZELL
Deputy General Counsel
JASON T. BRAMOW
Assistant General Counsel
Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 12428
Austin, Texas 78711
(512) 936-3306
Counsel for Amicus Curiae

Copy from re:SearchTX


CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Microsoft Word reports that this document contains 737 words,


excluding the exempted portions of the document.

/s/ James P. Sullivan


James P. Sullivan
Counsel for Amicus Curiae

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On October 20, 2024, this document was served electronically on all


counsel of record as follows:

Jeff Leach (jleach@grayreed.com)


Joe Moody (joe.moody@house.texas.gov)
Counsel for Petitioners

Billy Cole (william.cole@oag.texas.gov)


Counsel for Respondents

/s/ James P. Sullivan


James P. Sullivan
Counsel for Amicus Curiae

Copy from re:SearchTX


Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below:

Envelope ID: 93359639


Filing Code Description: Amicus Brief
Filing Description: Letter brief as amicus curiae supporting TDCJ
Status as of 10/21/2024 8:48 AM CST

Associated Case Party: Office of the Attorney General of Texas

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

Edward Marshall edward.marshall@oag.texas.gov 10/21/2024 8:43:25 AM SENT

William Cole william.cole@oag.texas.gov 10/21/2024 8:43:25 AM SENT

Associated Case Party: Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

Stephanie Greger stephanie.greger@tdcj.texas.gov 10/21/2024 8:43:25 AM SENT

Associated Case Party: Office of Governor Greg Abbott

Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status

James Sullivan james.sullivan@gov.texas.gov 10/21/2024 8:43:25 AM SENT

Copy from re:SearchTX

You might also like