Management Focus On P&G
Management Focus On P&G
Management Focus On P&G
a. What strategy was Procter & Gamble pursuing when it first entered foreign
markets? Why do you think this strategy became less viable later on?
The strategy became less viable because P&G's was facing high costs because of
extensive duplication of manufacturing, marketing, and administrative facilities in
different national subsidiaries. Duplication was the major cause of high costs.
Secondly, the barriers to cross-border trade were falling rapidly worldwide, and
fragmented national markets were merging into larger regional or global markets.
Also, the retailers through which P&G distributed its products were growing larger
and more global, such as Walmart, Tesco from the United Kingdom, and Carrefour
from France. These emerging global retailers were demanding price discounts from
P&G.
b. What strategy does P&G appear to be moving toward? What are the benefits
of this strategy? What are the potential risks associated with this strategy?
Benefits:
- P&G can enhance innovation and learning by tapping into knowledge and
experience from global business units.
Risks:
- Transnational strategies can create conflicts and tensions within and between global
business units. Because countries may have different goals, motivations, and
performance measures, and may compete for resources and influence.
- P&G's organizational culture and identity can change, because this strategy requires
the company to weigh the need for consistency and standardization against the need
for variety and adaptability.
Procter & Gamble's (P&G) recent sales decline can be attributed to several factors:
- Competition: Increased competition from both established brands and new entrants
in the consumer goods market can erode P&G's market share.