AI Governance For The Enterprise
AI Governance For The Enterprise
AI Governance For The Enterprise
04 →
Holistic AI governance
01
Introduction
Governance makes Are your colleagues pushing Keep reading for the full story
to operationalize AI? They’re
AI practical at the or try watsonx.governance
right to be excited.
enterprise level at no charge.
The Harvard Business Review reports1 that
“to call generative AI revolutionary is not
hyperbole. It has the potential to improve
productivity in any function that involves
cognitive tasks.”
The influence of AI is growing It's hard to operationalize Read key takeaways from
exponentially as organizational AI with confidence
a poll of global IT senior
leaders deploy the technology A wide variety of tools exists for AI
in nearly every industry. governance—but too often, models are decision-makers on the
built without proper clarity, monitoring pace of AI adoption.
At the same time, employees and leaders or cataloging. Without end-to-end AI
at many of these organizations have lifecycle tracking using automated
difficulty with the following aspects processes, scalability and transparent IBM Global AI Adoption
of implementing AI. processes are hindered. Explainable
results are elusive.
Index 2022 →
It’s difficult to manage risk and reputation AI regulations just keep changing
You’ve seen the headlines: unfair, Successful AI requires adherence to
unexplainable or biased AI models, laws and regulations—local, regional
in production. The resulting incorrect and national—which are proliferating at
assumptions and decisions can affect a rapid pace. Noncompliance could cost
customers and harm your brand. your organization tens of millions of dollars
in fines, as demonstrated by some of the
Explainable processes and results most stringent AI regulations currently
help auditors and customers know how debated globally, such as the proposed EU
specific analytic results were reached. AI Act. The current draft of the EU AI act
Such processes help ensure that results contemplates fines of up to €30 million,
don’t reflect bias around race, gender, age or 6% of a company’s global revenue.
or other key factors. These processes are
critical for patient diagnoses and treatment Model documentation is crucial—and
plans, reviewing transactions flagged it’s an area with aspects that are easy to
as suspicious, and loan applications miss for a data scientist who’s pressed for
that are denied. time and whose organization lacks clear
requirements.
Take action to build AI systems that are
transparent, explainable, fair and inclusive. Don’t disregard this step: new regulations
You’ll help preserve privacy, security, will require model documentation for
customer loyalty and trust. metadata and lineage.
Germany: Colombia: Norway: United States: China: United States: European Union:
AI Strategy National Policy for National NIST issues an AI Internet Information AI Bill of Rights EU AI Act
Digital Transformation AI Strategy risk management Service Algorithmic validation for endorsed and
South Korea: and AI framework Management algorithms to be begins rolling
AI Strategy Serbia: (IISARM) regulations explainable and out in 2024
Strategy for the protect against
India: development discrimination
National of AI European Union:
Strategy for AI The AI Act
↓ Singapore:
Fine: €30M or 6% Launches AI Verify—
of company’s global a testing framework
revenue and toolkit
80% of business
48% 46%
leaders see at least one
of these ethical issues Explainability Ethics
46% 42%
Bias Trust
Believe that generative AI will Believe generative AI
propogate established biases. cannot be trusted.
Such models are highly customizable, While generative models have pushed
scalable and cost effective. They can AI high on the agenda for most business
query extremely large volumes of data— leaders, their capabilities drive a new
and they’re learning all the while. “Off the complexity which can pose risks for
shelf” generative applications require little organizations and for society alike.
expertise and have the potential to eliminate
many tedious, time-consuming tasks.
Like any other initiative, To implement AI properly, you need Learn how to build a holistic
a strong cross-functional team. AI is
successful AI governance approach to AI governance
very much a strategic imperative for
depends upon the intersection many leaders, and it can feel like the list
of people, process and of stakeholders grows longer by the day. Read the blog →
Some of these people are new to the AI
technology. lifecycle concept, and others have new
reasons to be involved in AI efforts.
Process Technology
AI governance traces and documents the The establishment of well-planned, well-
origin of data, associated models and executed, and well-controlled AI requires
metadata, and overall data pipelines for specific technological building blocks. Look
audit. Your documentation should include for a solution that governs the end-to-end AI
the techniques that trained each model, lifecycle and has the following capabilities:
the hyperparameters that were used,
and the metrics from testing phases. This – Integrates data of many types and
results in increased transparency visibility sources across diverse deployments
by the appropriate stakeholders into the – Is open, flexible and works with your
model’s behavior throughout the lifecycle, existing tools of choice
including the data that was influential in its – Offers self-service access with privacy
development and the model’s possible risks. controls and a way to track lineage
– Automates model building, deployment,
You’ll first want to benchmark and evaluate scaling, training and monitoring
your organization’s current AI technology – Connects multiple stakeholders
and processes. Some processes and through a customizable workflow
stakeholders may already be aligned and can – Provides support to build customized
be extended, while others might need to be workflows for different personas using
replaced. Then create a set of automated governance metadata
governance workflows in line with compliance
requirements. New and existing AI models
can adopt these workflows, which should
be designed to avoid the process delays
mentioned above. Finally, set up a framework
to alert owners and users when a model’s
metrics exceed the acceptable threshold.
Plan Define measurable Review existing processes Conduct gap analysis Review existing skills and
performance metrics that monitor fairness and against current and demand for responsible
for AI usage across explainability potential AI regulations AI, and align with
your organization business objectives
Build Establish traceability Operationalize updated Make sure model Specify the new roles, skills
and auditability of processes and checkpoints documentation and learning agendas required
current processes throughout the AI lifecycle is accessible to implement responsible AI
Create Create automatic Enable AI models that Act to strengthen Establish a repeatable, end-
documentation of model are fair, explainable and regulatory compliance to-end workflow with built-in
lineage and metadata high-quality, minimize for data science teams stakeholder approvals to
drift and conduct regular without overhead lower risk and increase scale
policy reviews
Meet the toolkit for AI Built on the IBM® watsonx™ AI and data With this governance toolkit, audits
platform, this toolkit employs software can become easier. Trace and document
governance. The IBM®
automation to strengthen your ability the origin of data, the models and their
watsonx.governance™ to meet regulatory requirements and associated metadata, and the pipelines.
approach helps you to direct, address ethical concerns. You get
comprehensive AI governance without The documentation will include the
manage and monitor your the excessive costs of switching from techniques that trained each model,
organization’s AI activities. your current data science platform. the hyperparameters used, and the
metrics from testing phases.
Before a model is put into production,
it’s validated to assess business risks. Expect increased transparency into each
Once the model goes live, it’s continuously model’s behavior throughout its lifecycle,
monitored for fairness, quality and drift. knowledge of the data that was influential
Regulators and auditors can get access in its development, and the ability
to documentation that provides to determine possible risks.
explanations of the model’s behavior
and predictions.
Consider these
components:
– Translate external AI – Automate facts and workflow for – Monitor, catalog and govern AI
regulations into policies compliance to business standards models from where they reside
for automated enforcement – Identify, manage, monitor and report – Automate the capture
– Enhance adherence to regulations on risk and compliance at scale of model metadata
for audit and compliance – Use dynamic dashboards for clear, – Increase prediction accuracy,
– Use dynamic dashboards for concise, customizable results identifying how AI is used
compliance across policies – Enhance collaboration across and where it lags
and regulations multiple regions and geographies
– Operationalize AI governance
– Manage risk and reputation
– Support regulatory compliance
20