Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10
1
Lab 4 (Thevenin and Norton Equivalent Circuits)
Cameron M. Carty
ECE 09205, Principals and Applications of ECE for Non Majors
Bernard Pietrucha
June 29th 2024
2
Table of Contents
Abstract- 3
Objectives-4
Discussion and Results- 5,6,7,8,9
Summary and Conclusions- 10
3
Abstract
The objective of this lab was to develop Thevenin and Norton
equivalent circuits both analytically and experimentally. Initially, the Thevenin and Norton equivalents of a given circuit (Figure 1) with parameters \(V_{in} = 5V\), \(R1 = 2.4 k\Omega\), \(R2 = 2.4 k\Omega\), and \(R3 = 1.8 k\Omega\) were determined analytically. The circuit and its Thevenin equivalent were then constructed on a breadboard to verify the accuracy of the analytical calculations. Additionally, a custom circuit with at least five resistors, incorporating both series and parallel configurations, was designed and analyzed. The Thevenin and Norton equivalents of this custom circuit were calculated, and their terminal characteristics were compared to the original design through breadboard measurements. The experimental results confirmed the theoretical equivalence, demonstrating the practical application of Thevenin’s and Norton’s theorems in circuit analysis. 4
Objectives
1. Develop Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits analytically.
2. Build the circuit from Figure 1 and its Thevenin equivalent on the breadboard. 3. Determine that the circuits are equivalent. 4. Master parallel and series circuits. 5
Discussion and Results
6 7 8
Discussion and Results and
In this experiment, we applied Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and
Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to analyze a circuit comprising three different resistors (R1, R2, R3) and a DC voltage source (Vin). The primary objective was to ensure that the power dissipated by each resistor remained well below its ¼ Watt rating, necessitating preliminary calculations to select appropriate resistor values.
From my calculations, the power dissipated by R1 was 0.0207 Watts,
by R2 was 0.0149 Watts, and by R3 was 0.00992 Watts. These values confirm that each resistor operates safely below the ¼ Watt dissipation limit.
When measuring the actual voltages, currents, and resistances in the
circuit using a multi-meter, it is important to consider how the measurement process itself can impact these parameters:
1. Resistances: The presence of the multi-meter, especially when set to
measure resistance, can introduce additional resistance into the circuit due to the internal resistance of the meter. This can slightly alter the actual resistance values measured compared to their theoretical values.
2. Voltages: When measuring voltage, the multi-meter's internal impedance
should ideally be very high to minimize the current drawn from the circuit. However, if the impedance is not high enough, it can cause a small current draw, slightly affecting the voltage measurement across the components.
3. Currents: The multi-meter, when configured to measure current, is
inserted in series with the circuit. The internal resistance of the meter in this mode, although typically very low, adds to the total resistance in the circuit. This can slightly reduce the current measured compared to the theoretical values. 9
Despite these potential discrepancies, my experimental values showed
good agreement with our theoretical calculations. This confirms the reliability of KVL and KCL in predicting circuit behavior, as long as careful consideration is given to the measurement process and its possible impacts on the circuit. Understanding and accounting for these effects is crucial for accurate circuit analysis and validation of theoretical predictions. 10
Summary and Conclusions
This lab focused on utilizing Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and
Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) to analyze a circuit with three resistors (R1, R2, R3) and a DC voltage source (Vin). By ensuring the power dissipation in each resistor was well below ¼ Watt, we selected appropriate resistor values and performed theoretical calculations to predict voltages, currents, and power dissipation.
My theoretical calculations indicated power dissipations of 0.0207
Watts for R1, 0.0149 Watts for R2, and 0.00992 Watts for R3. These values were validated by constructing the circuit and measuring the actual values using a multi-meter. Despite minor discrepancies introduced by the measurement process, the experimental results closely matched the theoretical predictions.
The measurement process itself can influence the circuit parameters
due to the internal resistance and impedance of the multi-meter, affecting resistance, voltage, and current measurements. However, these effects were minimal and did not significantly impact the overall analysis.
In conclusion, the experiment successfully demonstrated the
application of KVL and KCL for circuit analysis, and the measured values aligned well with the theoretical calculations. This reinforces the reliability of these fundamental electrical laws when careful consideration is given to measurement techniques and potential sources of error.