2023 LHC 6816

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Writ Petition No.

55800 of 2023

Muhammad Tariq Sahi Govt. of Punjab and others

20.12.2023 Mr. Imran Raza Chadhar, Advocate for the petitioner.


Mr. Muhammad Osman Khan, Assistant Advocate General,
Punjab with Mr. Rashid Bhatti, Law Officer and Farooq
Sultan, Deputy Director Mines.

The petitioner is aggrieved of enhancement of reserve


price of auction of Block No.116-A South District Sargodha
for the purpose of mining by Government of the Punjab.

2. It is case of the petitioner that 500% increase in the


reserve price is without lawful authority and tainted with
mala fide only to prevent the petitioner from participating in
the bid.

3. The report and parawise comments have been filed on


behalf of respondents No.1 to 4, inter alia, stating therein that
sandstone Block No.116-A comprising of an area of 226.03
acres District Sargodha was granted to the petitioner against a
bid of Rs.7,02,70,000/- for period of 03 years w.e.f
21.12.2019 to 20.12.2022; that before expiry of lease period
of the Block in question, a meeting of the Special Experts
Committee was held on 02.11.2022 at Mines & Minerals
Head Quarter Office, Lahore to determine the Reserve Prices
of several mining leases/blocks/zones, which were vacant or
likely to be vacant till 30.01.2023 throughout the Province of
Punjab; that the notification dated 24.10.2022 specifically
provides that the Special Expert Committee shall determine
the reserve price of the blocks/zones of Minor Minerals by
majority decision of members including Chairperson of the
2
Writ Petition No.55800 of 2023

Committee under the rules; that in the said meeting, the minor minerals
blocks/zones of District Sargodha including Block in question were also
discussed, and the Special Experts Committee determined reserve price of
Block in question as Rs. 40,00,00,000/- by majority decision for up-coming
auction plan as per schedule, keeping in view market forces/trend, such as
the fixed reserve prices of the surrounding blocks and bid moneys received
thereon in the best public interest; that the Block in question has more area
in acres as compared to the surrounding sandstone blocks which are granted
against much higher bids, the relevant details whereof are as follows:

Sr. Block/Lease No. Acreage Status Reserve Price Total Bid


No. (Rs.) Money (Rs.)

1. ML-SRG-Sand
Granted since 60,00,00,000 60,05,00,000
Stone 64.08
04.10.2021
(4-A+4-B)/116
2. ML-SRG-Sand
Granted since 35,00,00,000 59,50,00,000
Stone 78.09
30.0.2022
(5)/116
3. ML-SRG-Sand
Granted since 24,10,00,000 65,07,02,000
Stone 53.07
06.02.2021
(6)/116
4. ML-SRG-Sand
Stone (A)/116 Vacant Since
226.03 40,00,00,000
(Block in 21.09.2023
question)

It is further stated in the comments that as per order of respondent No.1 the
petitioner has fully enjoyed by excavating sand stone from the said leased
area under Rule 228 of the Punjab Mining Concession Rules, 2002. Now,
the leases of minor mineral (Sand Stone & Ordinary Sand), which are
vacant or likely to be vacant upto 15.12.2023, have been advertised for open
auction against the fixed reserve prices of each block/ zone in newspaper
through "Daily Express" dated 20.08.2023 under Rule 198 of the Punjab
Mining Concession Rules, 2002. As per said advertisement, open auction of
leases of minor minerals of District Sargodha, including the Block in
question was scheduled to be held on 11.09.2023, 02.10.2023 and
01.11.2023 respectively.
3
Writ Petition No.55800 of 2023

4. Learned Assistant Advocate General, Punjab contends that to


sabotage the legitimate auction process, the petitioner has filed the instant
petition with mala-fide intention. The instant case revolves around the
fixation of reserve price of the Block in question to the tune of
Rs.40,00,00,000/-, vide decision of Special Experts Committee taken in its
meeting dated 02.11.2022. The Special Experts Committee has determined
the reserve price of the Block in question keeping in view the different
factors, especially the market trend. The petitioner, in connivance with other
existing lease holders, just wants to maintain regional monopoly over the
business of sand stone that is why he has involved the Mines Department in
an uncalled for litigation. His action point to his wish that the general public
do not participate in the auction proceedings and offer bids for the Blocks of
the sand stone, which is against the fundamental right of other citizens as
envisaged in Article 18 of the Constitution of Pakistan.

5. In rebuttal, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that despite


several times, auction of Block No.116-A subject matter of this petition
could not be carried out successfully on account of exorbitant reserve price.
According to him, if an auction fails for such number of times, the matter is
to be sent back to the Special Experts Committee for review of the reserve
price.

6. Fixation of reserve price is prerogative of the concerned government


department and in this regard, neither any existing lessee nor any
prospective bidder can seek fixation of the reserve price of his own choice.
There is no cavil to the proposition that while fixing reserve price, the
exercise of discretion by the public authority must be just, fair and
reasonable and any arbitrary, whimsical and capricious exercise of such
authority is amenable to judicial scrutiny, however, the scope of jurisdiction
under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973
in that regard is very limited. For such a challenge to succeed in writ
jurisdiction, it is imperative for the petitioner to establish that the reserve
price fixed by the public functionaries is so unreasonable that no authority
4
Writ Petition No.55800 of 2023

with prudent mind could have fixed the same. This is also known as the
wednesbury principle. Reliance in this regard has been placed on the cases
of Messrs 3N-Lifemed Pharmaceuticals Vs. Government of Punjab through
Secretary Primary and Secondary Healthcare Department and others
(2023 CLC 948) and Hajj Organizers Association of Pakistan through
Authorised Officer and 11 others Vs. Federation of Pakistan through
Secretary Ministry of Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony, Islamabad
and 2 others (PLD 2020 Sindh 42)

7. In the instant case, as emphasized by the respondents in their


parawise comments, the reserve price of Rs.40,00,00,000/- for Block
No.116-A has been prescribed by the Special Experts Committee in the
public interest keeping in view the market forces/trend, such as the fixed
reserved prices of the surrounding blocks and corresponding bids received
therein, a chart whereof has been reproduced in Paragraph No.3 herein
above. The above explanation provides sufficient justification for the
exercise of restraint in the matter and no case of arbitrary or unreasonable
exercise of authority warranting interference has been established by the
petitioner. Needless to observe that case auction for the Block in question
fails to fetch bids for and above the reserve price advertised, as per
directive/instruction dated 26.05.2021, the matter shall be referred to the
Committee of Special Experts for review of the reserve price.

8. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

(RAHEEL KAMRAN)
JUDGE
*Z.A. Manzoor*

You might also like