Managing Risk
Managing Risk
Managing Risk
TO WIN
Managing Risk
Managing Risk
DISCLAIMER
Trade to Win for TradingView is NOT a buy sell signal system. It is a decision support system to help
traders and investors trade the markets in the footsteps of “smart money”.
Trading all markets contains substantial risk. An investor could potentially lose all or more than the
initial investment. Risk capital is money that can be lost without jeopardizing ones’ financial security
or life style. Only risk capital should be used for trading and only those with sufficient risk capital
should consider trading. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described
below. no representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses
similar to those shown; in fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical
performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program.
One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with
the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no
hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk of actual trading.
for example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of
trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are
numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific
trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance
results and all which can adversely affect trading results.
Your risk management strategy will depend on many factors, for example your account size, account
leverage, style of trading (scalping, intraday, swing, investment) or the profitability of the trading
strategy. It is very closely linked to another key element of successful trading - trade management.
There are many risk management techniques, but we will show you a few of the common ones,
most often used with VSA trading.
Note 1: In this document we use the term ‘reward/risk’ instead of the traditional ‘risk/reward’ to
avoid any confusion between the ratio name and the standard formula used for the calculation,
which is the potential reward divided by the potential risk.
Note:2: In order to keep the following descriptions simple, we are not considering some aspects, for
example the average price of the open position, commissions paid by the trader, slippage, etc.
For example, if your current account value is £100,000 then in every single trade your maximum risk
is 1% of £100,000, equal to £1000. Knowing this value and the place of your stop loss, you can
calculate the optimal lot size for that trade. On the other hand, if you know the lot size you are
planning to trade, and the price of one tick of the instrument, you can calculate the price level of the
stop loss.
Depending on your account size, style of trading and your personal preferences, the risk per trade
percentage could generally vary from between 0.2 to 3% of your capital.
Let’s assume your current account value is $100,000, you are planning to trade XYZ stock, the
expected open price of the position is $145.00 and your stop loss is at the level $130.00, then the lot
size will be calculated as follows:
(Risk per Trade) / (Expected Open Price – Stop Loss Price) => ($100 000 * 1%) / ($145 - $130) = 66
shares.
In classic VSA methodology, the stop loss is usually placed behind the bars with very significant Ultra
High Volume, therefore the calculation shown above is most common for VSA trading.
Another example: you are planning to open a short trade on the EUR/USD currency pair with 1 lot.
Your account value is $10,000, tick value is $1, tick size (minimal price change) is equal to $0.0001
and the expected open price of the position is $1.1800. The place of the stop loss can be calculated
as follows:
If you are opening a long trade, you would use the following formula:
Expected Open Price – ((Risk per Trade) / Tick Value) * tick size) => 1.1800 – ((($10 000 * 1%) /$1)
*0.0001) = 1.1800 – 0.01 = $1.1700
It must be noted that none the above formulas include the bid/ask spread, which might be useful to
consider especially for those instruments where it is generally big.
Some traders also add other parameters to this rule. The most common one is that the total risk in
all running trades cannot exceed a certain percentage of your capital. This value usually varies
between 6% and 10%.
For example, if you have 2% risk per trade and 6% of the total risk, you can have up to 3 trades
running simultaneously.
Most commonly, traders use derivatives (specifically options and futures) to protect their trades or
portfolio, but in some circumstances, they may also trade the same or very closely linked
(correlated) assets in an opposite direction.
It must be noted that the trader must think carefully before implementing this kind of risk
management, because hedging can be even more risky, time consuming and cost more than simple
risk management strategies.
Assuming an accumulation in the near background followed by Low Volume testing around the top
of the Ultra High Volume zone, on the 26th of May 2020 the trader purchases some Boeing Company
stock shares (ticker: BA-NYSE) at the price of $143.00. The price rises till the 8th of June, but serious
weakness is observed on the 6th, 7th and 8th of June.
If the price of Boeing collapses below $89.00 (the bottom of an Ultra High Volume zone), both trades
might be closed, and the losses on the Boeing trade will be compensated by the profit on the CVX
trade. There is also the option of closing only the BA trade and keeping CVX running.
When the Boeing correction ends and the initial trend recovers, depending on how cautious the
trader is, they could have several options to close the hedging trade. In this example it can be on the
13th or 23rd of November or on the 2nd of December where the price breaks the top of the previous
Test Bar on the BA chart. In this example, in addition to the profit on BA stock they will also gain
some profit on the CVX trade.
The biggest risk in this strategy is that two instruments may decorrelate for some time and move in
opposite directions. In this case, the trader will have to decide either to close both trades or to wait
until the correlation recovers.
Another example:
After the Test in an uptrend, on 23rd of June 2020, the trader purchases 500 shares of Cisco Systems
(ticker: CSCO - NASDAQ) at the price of $45.55 per share and expects to close the trade at the level
of $42.73 if the price goes against the trade. A week later the two VSA principles Potential
Professional Selling (PS) and No Demand appear on the chart. Thinking that this weakness can
temporarily turn the stock down, they change their mind and instead of closing the position at
$42.73, decide to hedge their investment. To do so they can buy put options.
Let’s assume that on the 6th of July 2020, when the trader decides to hedge their position, five put
option contracts with the strike price of $45.00 for $1.5 per share and an expiration date of the 20th
of October 2020 are available. To cover all CSCO shares, the total price they pay to buy them is:
If the CSCO price stays above the strike price by the expiration date, the put options will not be
exercised and become worthless. The trader will lose the $750 they invested in it. They will also
need to decide what to do with the stock trade: close it at the current market price (when, for
example, the price is below the open price of the position plus premium) or to keep it running (when
the price is above the open price of the position plus premium) and benefit from the potential price
gain.
On the 13th of August 2020 the price gaps down, closes significantly below the strike price at $42.72,
and continues to drop further. From that moment the trader may exercise put options at any point
of time. For example, they could do it on the weakness in a downtrend (when the price breaks the
bottom of the No Demand bars on the 17th of September or 19th of October 2020) or on the day the
put options expire. In all cases, while the price stays below $43.50 ($45.0 - $1.5), the total loss will be
the same:
It must be noted that this value might be significantly bigger if there are opening gaps or very fast
price moves.
Another example applies to the hedging trading accounts provided mostly by Forex brokers. It uses a
similar technique to that in the first example, but the difference is that hedging is performed on the
same asset.
In contrast to netting types of trading accounts where only one running position per instrument can
be presented at any point of time, hedging accounts accept one or several positions in the same or
even different directions on the same instrument.
With an expectation that during the day the AUD/CAD currency pair might tank, the trader decided
to wait for a short trade. On the 23rd of August 2021, they were alerted about a Short VSA Setup on
the 1 minute time frame and placed a resting sell-stop order below the low of the No Demand VSA
principle. The order was triggered at 12:33:15, the short position was opened at the price C$0.91443
and they placed the stop loss at C$0.91481. Within the next few bars the price came closer to the
level where the trader was expecting the correction which might have moved the price to, or be
even higher than, the entry level. They therefore removed the stop loss order and at 12:36:30,
placed a resting buy-stop order at C$0.91401 which was executed a few seconds later and created
another position on the same instrument with the same size, but in a different direction at the level
of C$0.91406.
Again it must be noted that such an operation is only possible on a hedging trading account. On a
netting account, it will close the initial short position and record the profit in the trading history.
If the AUD/CAD price goes lower, the trader may close the long position, restore the stop loss at the
same or even a lower level and benefit from the down move. Otherwise, if the currency pair goes
above C$0.91443, they can close the short position, set the stop loss below the current price and
benefit from an up move.
This hedging strategy eliminates one of the risks we saw in the first example whereby traded
instruments may temporarily decorrelate.
It should be noted that when the broker uses a dynamic bid/ask spread or when positions are rolled
over to the next day, the changes in spread and swap commissions may impact protected profit.
Therefore, the trader must carefully study the pros and cons of this technique before using it.
Long side:
(Take Profit Price – Position Open Price) / (Position Open Price - Stop Loss Price)
Short side:
(Position Open Price - Take Profit Price) / (Stop Loss Price – Position Open Price)
It is obvious that to become profitable, a trader must follow the rule that the reward is always bigger
than risk or, in other words, the value of the reward/risk ratio should be bigger than 1.
In VSA methodology, the stop loss and the take profit are usually set around the top and the bottom
of the Trigger Bar or around the closest key support/resistance levels. Then, knowing the position of
the stop loss and using the Rule of One Percent the trader can define the lot size they are planning
to trade.
This technique can be used both with hedging and netting account types but has one drawback. If
the price continues to change in the direction of the trade after the position is closed on the profit
target, the trader will get a smaller profit than was theoretically possible.
The size of the trade can be calculated based on the Rule of One Percent. Then this size is divided
into several parts, for example, three. The first stop loss is set in the same way as for a Fixed Stop
Loss and a Fixed Profit Target strategy and is called an initial stop loss. The remaining stop losses are
distributed between the open price and the initial stop loss preferably around the minor
support/resistance levels.
On one hand this technique decreases risk, but from the other it has very serious drawbacks.
First, it is time consuming as before opening the trade, the trader will need to perform a complicated
calculation of the total risk. For scalp and intraday trades, it may delay entry significantly enough to
decrease profits or even miss the trade.
Secondly, the majority of trading platforms don’t support such order handling with OCO (One
Cancels Other) orders, therefore the trader will need to set all stop losses manually and then later, if
the profit target is reached, remove them all. This creates the risk of a ‘forgotten order’ which may
result in an unexpected trade.
To eliminate obstacles, instead of using intermediate stop losses, the trader may manually close a
losing position on specific conditions before the initial stop loss is triggered.
In this case, the initial stop loss will be executed if there are fast sharp moves against the trade and
is sometimes called an emergency stop loss.
• A Long Trade
o The appearance of a bar on increasing volume with its high lower than the low of
the Test on which an entry has taken place.
o The appearance of a bar with Very High or Ultra High Volume closed on its bottom
and below an open price of the position.
o A change of the trend to the short side and a Sign of Weakness (SOW) appearing.
• A Short Trade
o The appearance of a bar on increasing volume with its low higher than the high of
the No Demand (ND) on which an entry has taken place.
o The appearance of a bar with Very High or Ultra High Volume closed at its top and
above an open price of the position.
o A change of the trend to the long side and the appearance of a Sign of Strength
(SOS).
This strategy is mostly used in scalping and intraday trading but might also be applied to swing
trading.
On one hand, this kind of trade management offers a possibility of maximizing profitability. On the
other hand it has a few serious issues:
1. Without a profit target it is impossible to calculate the reward/risk of the trade which may
lead to an overall loss.
2. Where the profit from several trades is small, it might be wiped out by one losing trade. As
an example, let’s say that over the day a trader has made four successful trades profiting £5,
£3, £6 and £4. Later they lose one for £20. Their total profit over the day will then be negative:
£5+£3+£6+£4 -£20 = -£2.
To overcome those drawbacks, the trader may define the price of the profit target in a similar way to
the Fixed Stop Loss and a Fixed Profit Target technique, but instead of placing an order there, they
can save that price level in their mind or just draw the line on the chart. This place (price) will be
called the initial profit target.
When the price reaches the initial profit target, depending on the market situation, the trader can
either close the position, keep the position open or even close part of it leaving the remaining part
running. If the trade is still ongoing, they can move the initial stop order in the direction of the trade
to limit potential losses or to lock in some profit.
A stop order which follows the price changing in favor of the open position is called a trailing stop.
From its definition, a trailing stop should not be moved against the trade direction. If you draw lines
on the chart through all the levels of the trailing stop over time, it will look like stairs going up (for a
long trade) or down (for a short trade).
Placing a stop loss at the open price of the position or a few ticks away from it in the direction of
trade is called a breakeven stop or just breakeven.
Breakeven is widely used in trading as, after it is placed, the risk of losing money significantly
decreases, though does not completely disappear. At the same time, the trader must use it very
carefully as many trades with zero or small profit may lead to negative total profit in the long term.
Most trading platforms provide automatic trailing stop orders with different parameters, but in
some situations, the trader may still need to handle them manually.
There are many ways to decide when to move trailing stops. The most common ones are:
• Use the fixed value of the price change. For example, when the price has changed by 10 pips
in the trade direction, the trailing stop is moved.
• Use the percentage value of the price change. For example, when the price has changed by
2% in the trade direction, the trailing stop is moved.
• Use the specific market conditions as listed later in this document.
After the decision to change the trailing stop has been made, the trader needs to understand where
to place a new stop. There are also many ways to decide its location. For example, when the price
When a trader is using VSA, they can consider the following specific conditions as to when and
where to move a trailing stop:
• After a bar with Ultra High or Very High Volume appears, a trailing stop can be moved a few
ticks below the low (for a long trade) or above the top (for the short trade) of that bar.
• After the countertrend VSA principle appears, a trailing stop can be moved a few ticks below
the low (for a long trade) or above the top (for a short trade) of that bar.
• After the bar with Ultra or Very Wide Spread (range) appears, a trailing stop can be moved a
few ticks above the low (for a long trade) or a few ticks below the high (for the short trade) of
that bar.
• When the price moves sideways for a long time (relative to the time frame in which it is being
looked at), a trailing stop can be placed a few ticks below the lowest low (for a long trade) or
above the highest high (for a short trade) of that move.
• When a market correction has ended and the trend of the instrument has recovered and is in
the direction of the trade again, a trailing stop can be placed a few ticks below the lowest low
(for a long trade) or above the highest high (for the short trade) of that correction.
In the image above, upon receiving the ‘Test in a strong market’ VSA alert, the trader sees a
potential trade. On one hand the price may rise to the closest key resistance level (283.0) while on
the other an initial stop loss might be placed below the trigger line (the low of a Potential
Professional Buying (PB) VSA principle) at 277.8. Considering that the position might be open above
the top of the VSA Setup confirmation Test at 280.2 and initial profit target at 283.0, they estimate
the reward/risk ratio to be 1.17 [(283.0 – 280.2) / (280.2 - 277.8)] and open the trade at 16:40 at the
expected level. Immediately after an order is executed, they place the initial stop loss order at
277.8. At this point they have an order in one place only: at the initial stop loss level.
At 17:40 a sideways move starts and, because it is taking too much time, at 18:40 the trader decides
to protect their profit by placing a trailing stop at 283.7. The sideways move ends in the direction of
the trade with an Ultra Wide Spread bar on Ultra High Volume, and the trader moves the trailing
stop again above the low of that bar to 285.2.
At 4:35 another sideways move starts and around 7:45 the trader moves the trailing stop higher to
287.0. Later, after the next correction has ended at 9:20, they change it again to 289.5.
This process continues until the price moves against the trade and triggers the trailing stop at its last
place. We can see that even if the position closes later at 289.5, the profit gained on the trade will
be three times greater than when using a fixed profit target.