Famliy Law2
Famliy Law2
Famliy Law2
SECTION- “A”
SEMESTER- FOURTH
SUBMITTED BY SUBMITTED TO
Associate Professor
Page 1 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
Introduction
Marriage under Islam is a matrimonial relation and an institution which
legalizes the sexual activities between a male and female for the object of
procreation of kids, promotion of love, mutual support and creation of
families which are considered an essential unit in a society. Just like
Hinduism, Islam is also a strong advocate of marriage. However, the Muslim
conception of marriage differs from the Hindu conception according to which
marriage is not a mere civil contract but a sacrament. According many
philosophers, marriage in Islam is a religious duty. Everyone must marry in
order to fulfil one’s desire of procreation of kids legally.
Muslim law has been derived from various codified and uncodified sources
like- Quran, Ijma, Qiyas, customs, urf, precedents, equity and various
legislations. There are 4 major sunni school of thoughts- hanifa, hamabli,
maliki and shafai. These four schools recognize each other’s validity and they
have interacted in legal debate over the centuries. In India, Hanifa school of
Islamic law is dominant.
Classification of Marriage
Valid (sahih)
When all the legal requirements are fulfilled and there are no prohibitions
affecting the parties, then the marriage is correct or ‘sahih’. The prohibitions
can be permanent as well as temporary, in case of permanent prohibitions:
the marriage will be void and if the prohibitions are temporary then the
marriage is irregular.
Page 2 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
Void (Batil)
The marriage being void ab initio creates no rights or obligations and the
children born out of such marriage are illegitimate. A marriage forbidden by
the rules of blood relationship, affinity or fosterage is void. Similarly, a
marriage with the wife of another or a divorced wife during iddah period is
also void.
Irregular (Fasid)
Due to lack of some formality, or the existence of an impediment which can
be rectified, a marriage becomes irregular, However, this irregularity is not
permanent in nature and can be removed. Thus, the marriage itself is not
unlawful. It can be made valid once the prohibitions are rectified. Marriage in
such circumstances or with following prohibitions are called ‘Fasid’.
Page 3 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
No witnesses are required for mut’ah. And just like in any other contract, the
woman being a party can lay down conditions for her sexual union
throughout this time limit, this can also include her daily maintenance. Her
temporary husband must respect these conditions. The marriage
automatically dissolves at the end of the stated period. No matter how short
the duration was, the woman has to practice abstinence lasting up to two
menstrual cycles.
Interesting part is that, the temporary husband and wife can renew the
contract but the husband must regardless of this pay the amount to the
bride. Husband has a unilateral right to revoke the marriage-mark of his
superior position in the relationship. But the woman can refuse to be intimate
with him or even leave him, but in such case, she must return back the
amount she received from him.
Page 4 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
Dissolution of Marriage
There are 2 categories of divorce under Muslim law:
Judicial
Page 5 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
Extra-Judicial
The Extra-judicial mode of Divorce can further be divided into 3 subdivisions:
Talaaq-i-sunnat
It can further be divided into two categories:
i) Talaaq-i-ahsan
A single pronouncement of divorce is made during the period of tuhr (the
period of purity between two menstrual cycles), followed by abstinence from
sexual intercourse during the period of iddat. Here, the divorce can be
revoked at any time before the completion of iddat, thus preventing hasty
and unreasonable divorces.
ii) Talaaq-i-hasan
A husband is required to pronounce a formula of Talaaq three times, during
three successive tuhrs. It is important that pronouncements are made when
no intercourse takes place during any period of tuhr. The marriage is
dissolved irrevocably, regardless to the period of iddat.
Talaaq-i-Biddat
It is a form of Islamic divorce which is instant in nature. It allows any Muslim
man to legally divorce his wife by stating the word “Talaaq” three times in
oral, written, or more recently, electronic form. This is prevalent among the
Muslims in India, especially among the adherents Hanafi school of Islam. This
is also known as “Triple Talaaq” and has been a subject to debate and
controversy.
Page 6 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
also wreaks havoc to the lives of many divorced women and their children,
especially those belonging to the weaker economic sections of the society.”
There have been many cases in High courts and the supreme court, where
the court invalidated the instant triple talaaq. In Shamim Ara V. State of
U.P, the court observed that:
However, one of the principle conflicts against the proposed enactment has
consistently been its acknowledgment of a common offense as a cognisable
and non-bailable offence.
Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum And Ors 1985 SCR (3) 8441
One of the most landmark cases in the history of India, pertaining to Muslim women, was the
Shah Bano Case of 1985. This case introduced an ever standing conflict between what should
and should not come under the adjudication of the Supreme Court of India.
Shah Bano Begum, a Muslim woman, was divorced by her husband, Mohd.
Ahmed Khan, by virtue of the Triple Talaq system. The issue that came up, was
that Ms Bano had claimed maintenance under the Code of Criminal Procedure,
rather than as per the personal laws.
1
1985 SCR (3) 844
Page 7 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
The personal laws of Islam state that a woman may be given maintenance for the
‘iddat’ period, i.e., a period of three menstrual cycles, along with the ‘mehr’, i.e.,
the money promised to the bride, at the time of marriage.
Beyond these two, there is hardly any legally enforceable way of maintaining the
woman for life. The Indian law, on the other hand, provides for maintenance for
life, barring some exceptions.
Held
The plaintiff and the defendant being Muslims, were to be governed by the
Muslim Personal Law. However, since the petition was filed under the Code of
Criminal Procedure, the district court, the High Court and the Supreme Court
passed their judgements, favouring Ms Shah Bano.
However, this judgement was opposed by the AIMPLB, as they claimed that
adjudication of Personal laws was beyond the jurisdiction of the courts.
The Shah Bano Case had received a lot of varied public stances. Muslim women
vehemently defended the Supreme Court judgement of husbands having to
maintain the wife.
The then government had passed a legislation, termed as ‘The Muslim Women
(Protection of Rights on Divorce), 1986’, and aimed to overturn the judgement of
the Supreme Court.
According to this legislation, Muslim women were entitled to a ‘fair and just’
amount of money within the ‘iddat’ period, beyond which, the husband was to
have no liability.
Ahmedabad Women Action Group (AWAG) v. Union of India (AIR (1997) 3 SCC 5732
Muslim law allows Muslim men to have four marriages, along with the right to divorce,
under the concept of Talaq, whereby, the husband has the authority to divorce by the
2
(AIR (1997) 3 SCC 573
Page 8 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
utterance of the term ‘Talaq‘, without judicial methods, and this may happen without her
consent. The PIL filed in this case addressed both these issues, along with some others.
to declare Muslim Personal Law which enables a Muslim male to give unilateral
Talaq to his wife without her consent and without resort to judicial process of
courts. as void, offending Articles 13. 14 and 15 of the Constitution.
to declare that the mere fact that a Muslim husband takes more than one wife is an
act of cruelty within the meaning of Clause VIII.
to declare that Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce Act, 1986 is void
as infringing Articles 14 and 15.
to further declare that the provisions of Sunni and Shia laws of inheritance which
discriminate against females in their share as compared to the share of males of the
same status. void as discriminating against females only on the ground of sex.
Held
In the light of these contentions, the court was of the opinion that India and Indians have been
governed by personal laws, regardless of the time period. It was of the opinion that an
interference by the court would lead to several undesirable outcomes, as the adjudication of
personal laws was beyond the jurisdiction of the courts. The petition was therefore dismissed.
Page 9 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
After the landmark judgement of Shah Bano’s case, there was a chaos in the Muslim personal
law. The parliament passed and enforced The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on
Divorce) Act, 1986, which provided that under section 3(1)(a), a divorced woman is entitled
to reasonable and fair provisions, and maintenance within the ‘iddat’ period. One of the
council, i.e, Danial Latifi challenged the above act, claiming that it was unconstitutional, and
in violation of Article 14 and 21.
Held
In this case, the petitioner, in his argument said that that the Act is unconstitutional and has
the potential of suffocating the Muslim women, and undermines the secular character, which
is the basic feature of the Constitution. There is no reason to deprive the Muslim women of
the applicability of section 125 of CrPC and present act is in violation of article 14 and 21. To
this, the respondent said that personal laws are a legitimate basis for discrimination and
therefore does not violate article 14 of the Constitution. The Court thereby held that the said
Act was not in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Indian constitution.
The petitioner was married to the respondent in 1948, in accordance with the
Muslim personal law, and subsequently had four sons.
The wife filed an application in the court, under Sec. 125 of the CrPC, claiming
that her husband had deserted her and that there was cruelty by the husband.
3
(2001) 7 SCC 740
4
(MANU/SC/0850/2002)
Page 10 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
The family court denied her maintenance, on the grounds that she had already been
divorced. However, a sum of Rs. 150/- was granted as maintenance for one son,
till he attained majority.
Held
The petitioner denied having been divorced. One of the major points of conflict,
was that ‘Is a divorce valid if it is not directly communicated to the wife( in this
case the husband said to have dissolved marriage by means of triple Talaq in
presence of neighbours) and the said divorce communicated to the appellant
become effective from the date of filing the written statement by the husband in
the proceeding?’
To this, the Supreme Court was of the view that the mere plea of a Talaq, would
not validate the same. Ther Quranic procedures of obtaining a Talaq need to be
fulfilled, i.e., Talaq has to be pronounced in the Quranic injunction.
The following case had several reactions, the most popular one being that the
concept of triple Talaq was both demeaning as well as cruel to Muslim women.
There were several other contentions, however, the idea that triple Talaq was
immoral stuck to the minds of people.
Shayara Bano v. Union of India and others. (The current Triple Talaq case.)
Though this case has not yet received a judgement, it deserves a mention in this article, as it
has challenged the very concept of ‘instantaneous triple Talaq’, though not the concept of
‘triple Talaq’ itself.
The mere approval of the PIL filed by Ms Shayara Bano has led to a ray of hope for millions
of women who have suffered because of this immoral and unfair practice. To begin with, this
petition has been greatly discussed, supported and believed to have given a chance to those
who have suffered for a long time.
Page 11 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
The PIL was initiated by Ms Shayara Bano, a resident of Uttarakhand, who was constantly
abused by her husband and eventually divorced by way of Triple Talaq at one go. Her plight
was heard by the Supreme Court of India and a 5-judge Constitutional Bench heard this case.
The verdict is yet to come.
India is a secular country and its citizens deserve to be happy, content and should always
have the right to equality and justice. The very fact that the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
has chosen to acknowledge the rights of those who truly deserve it, is commendable and a
positive step towards the injustice that women are subjected to.
India is the home to the second largest Muslim population. If several Islamic countries have
chosen to forgo the concept of Triple Talaq, why shouldn’t a secular country like India, do
the same?
Page 12 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
Conclusion
The notions of Muta marriage can be evidently seen in our country. In India,
temporary marriage is not recognized, although there exists few who
contract Muta marriage but such marriages are not enforceable in court.
Hyderabad is considered to be the epicentre of the practice where marriage
can be instituted for time span as short as one or two days. In a Hyderabad
case it was held that there is no difference between muta for an unspecified
period and a muta for life; a permanent nikah marriage for life can be
contracted by the use of word muta also; specification of the period for which
a muta marriage is contracted alone makes a marriage a temporary marriage
for the period specified.
The conflicts over the rights of minority women are best dealt with by
creating new representative bodies which have special provisions to ensure
that women are sufficiently represented. In the Shah Bano case, this would
have meant creating a new mechanism to administer Muslim personal law
instead of simply recognizing the Muslim Personal Law Board as the
legitimate representative of the Muslim community. Creating a new
mechanism is more sensitive to the political reality of Muslims in India, which
is that they consist of widely dispersed groups characterized by significant
differences. It would also make some provision to ensure that Muslim women
have some access to the institutions which make the rules which govern their
lives.
References
Ahmed, Akbar S. Discovering Islam: Making Sense of Muslim History
and Society.
New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul Inc., 1988. Brass, Paul.
R. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi:
Sage Publications, 1991.
Page 13 of 14
MARRIAGE UNDER MUSLIM LAW – SUMIITED BY RIJUL ARYA
Page 14 of 14