Supernovae - IBDP Physics HL FE2016 - Kognity-Part 4-4
Supernovae - IBDP Physics HL FE2016 - Kognity-Part 4-4
Supernovae - IBDP Physics HL FE2016 - Kognity-Part 4-4
Supernovae
In The accelerating universe (/study/app/12c-ibdp-physics-hl/sid-49-cid-
255088/book/the-accelerating-universe-id-11710), we encountered the importance of
Type Ia supernovae as standard candles which could be used to determine the distance
to distant galaxies, and how that led to the surprising discovery that the universe's
expansion rate is accelerating. Here, we will study the mechanism underlying Type I
supernovae and how that understanding leads to their use as standard candles, and we
will also consider Type II supernovae. All supernovae are associated with a catastrophic
core collapse of a star. In the process of the collapse, a tremendous amount of power is
generated to the extent that a supernova may be more luminous than its host galaxy of
hundreds of billion stars and be visible during the day. Typically, supernovae are billions
of times brighter than our Sun, the most luminous observed to date being SN 2015L,
with a peak energy output of 570 billion times the output of the Sun, and a peak
absolute magnitude of −23.5, or 2.2 × 10 W. As the core collapses, stellar material is
38
blasted outwards with speeds up to 10% of the speed of light, creating shock waves that
gather material from the surrounding interstellar medium into a shell around the
collapsed core, known as a supernova remnant. The Crab Nebula, see Figure 1A, is
such a supernova remnant, first identified in 1731 by an English astronomer and later
shown to be the remnant of a supernova which exploded in 1054 AD and was observed
by Chinese astronomers, see Figure 1B.
Be Aware
While the classification of both Type I and Type II is further subdivided, such as Type
Ia, Type Ib and Type Ic, we will not deal with such details and take the Type Ia to be
representative of Type I supernovae, and Type IIp as representative of Type II
supernovae.
Type Ia supernovae
Main sequence stars with a mass up to eight solar masses, 8M , will ascend the red
⊙
giant branch, and undergo a helium flash with their cores ending up as carbon-
oxygen white dwarfs. If such a white dwarf has a companion star in a binary star system
which becomes a red giant later, the white dwarf may accrete gas into a disc around
itself, see Figure 2. Gas from the accretion disc periodically falls onto the white dwarf
star. As discussed in Stellar evolution (/study/app/12c-ibdp-physics-hl/sid-49-cid-
255088/book/stellar-evolution-id-11793), white dwarfs are stable as a consequence of
the electron degeneracy pressure generated by their electrons through the
Pauli exclusion principle. However, there is a limit on the mass that electron degeneracy
pressure can withstand, namely the Chandrasekhar limit, estimated to be 1.4M for a
⊙
Figure 2. A binary system of two stars of unequal mass. The more massive
star evolves faster and has become a white dwarf. Its companion evolves
slower but as it expands, the strong gravitational effect of the white dwarf
may result in a mass stream, through which mass flows from the companion
star into an accretion disc around the white dwarf. This gas eventually falls
onto the white dwarf, which may push its mass to the Chandrasekhar limit,
leading to a cataclysmic explosion, a supernova. Credit: after STCcI
(http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1995/23/image/a/) with
annotations added.
As the white dwarf accretes gas from its binary companion, its mass increases. Once its
mass approaches the Chandrasekhar limit, electron degeneracy pressure fails and a
cataclysmic stellar explosion takes place. The exact details of the onset of the explosion
are not yet well understood. It is generally accepted that the white dwarf comes to
within ∼ 1% of the Chandrasekhar limit, after which carbon fusion ignites, followed by
oxygen fusion. Once fusion starts, the temperature of the white dwarf rises dramatically.
A star stabilised by thermal pressure is able to regulate its core temperature
through expansion. However, electron degeneracy pressure is temperature-independent
and a white dwarf is unable to regulate its core temperature. As a consequence, the
white dwarf undergoes a runaway thermonuclear process. Within seconds carbon and
oxygen are fused into heavier elements, releasing energy that exceeds the white dwarf's
binding energy, leading to a cataclysmic explosion. In the explosion, shock waves are
sent out, ejecting material with speeds up to 3% the speed of light, and enriching the
star's surroundings with the heavier elements fused in its core. Whether or not a
supernova remnant is formed and the companion star is ejected depends on the force of
the shock wave. The sequence of events leading a supernova explosion is
indicated in Figure 3 and an image of a Type Ia supernova explosion is shown
in Figure 4.
Much ongoing research is done to understand the onset of the Type Ia supernova
explosion, in no small measure due to its importance as a standard
candle in determining cosmological distances. However, as a consequence of the similar
initial conditions of the onset of the explosion, the light curves of Type Ia supernovae
show very little variation. Their peak luminosity is similar and their fall-off follows the
same profile, as seen in Figure 1 in the accelerating universe (/study/app/12c-ibdp-
physics-hl/sid-49-cid-255088/book/the-accelerating-universe-id-11710). It is this
luminosity regularity which makes them a candidate as a standard candle. In order to
distinguish between a Type Ia and Type II supernova, astrophysicists analyse the
spectrum of their light curves. Type Ia, resulting from a white dwarf star, contains no
hydrogen lines, unlike the spectra from Type II supernovae, see below.
Type II supernovae
Main sequence stars with masses between 8M and 40M are too massive for fusion
⊙ ⊙
to prevent gravitational core collapse. Core collapse forms the basis for all but the Type
Ia supernovae. Towards the end of the evolutionary cycle of these massive stars, they
are left with an iron core – see Nuclear fusion (/study/app/12c-ibdp-physics-hl/sid-49-
cid-255088/book/nuclear-fusion-id-12052) in stars. However, silicon burning in the
surrounding shell continues to increase the iron in the core until the core reaches the
Chandrasekhar limit. With electron degeneracy pressure no longer able to stabilise the
core, it collapses from an initial radius of about 3000km to a final radius of about
20km, i.e. from roughly the size of the Earth to that of Los Angeles, in a fraction of a
second. Outer parts of the core fall inward with speeds up to 25% the speed of light as
the core temperature increases. With increasing core temperature, photon energies
increase to a level whereby they can photodisintegrate nuclei into protons and neutrons,
leading to an even faster core collapse. In that process densities become so large that the
free electrons are captured by protons in an inverse β-decay to produce neutrons:
+ −
p + e → n + νe .
With the removal of free electrons there is no longer any electron degeneracy pressure
and all mechanisms leading to pressure counteracting gravity are gone. The core
collapses catastrophically in milliseconds until the density in the core reaches nuclear
densities, i.e., the density of a nucleus ρ
nucleus ∼ 3 × 10
17
kg m
−3
. At this point
neutrons, which as fermions also obey the Pauli exclusion principle, become degenerate,
and the core stiffens and becomes incompressible, which reverses the collapse, an event
called the core bounce. At this point the infalling outer parts of the core violently
collide with the stiffened core, creating shockwaves that travel throughout the star to its
surface. The energy stored in the shockwave as it travels outwards disintegrates the
nuclei into protons and neutrons. As the shockwave reaches the surface, it will blow off
its envelope, and what remains is a neutron star. This sequence of events is shown
in Figure 5, and Figure 6 shows the remnants of a Type II supernova.
Figure 5. A massive star ends up (a) with an onion-layered structure of
elements surrounding an iron core in shells undergoing fusion. (b) Unable
to undergo fusion, the iron core starts to collapse; notice the zoom in to
core size. The inner part of the core turns into neutrons (c) until neutron
degeneracy pressure leads to an incompressible core (d) and (e) forming
an outwards-travelling shockwave (shown in red). Eventually a remnant
remains with the surrounding material blown away. After R.J. Hall
on Wikipedia
(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Core_collapse_scenario.svg).
Figure 6. The remnants of supernova SN 1987A which was observed in
1987 and shone with the brightness of about 100 million Suns.
Credit: ESO (http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso1032/).
In Table 1, we show the typical core temperatures and densities as well as the timescale
involved in the evolution of a 25M star, followed by an animation, courtesy
⊙
of NASA/JPL (http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/video/details.php?id=1279).
Core
temperature Core density
Stage (K) (kg m
−3
) Duration
hydrogen 4 × 10
7
5 × 10
3
7 × 10
6
years
burning
helium 2 × 10
8
7 × 10
5
7 × 10
5
years
burning
carbon 6 × 10
8
2 × 10
8
600 years
burning
ing
oxygen 1.5 × 10
9
10
10
6 months
Core
temperature Core density
Stage Duration
−3
(K) (kg m )
burning
silicon 2.7 × 10
9
3 × 10
10
1 day
burning
core 5.4 × 10
9
3 × 10
12 1
second
collapse 4
core 2.3 × 10
10
4 × 10
15
milliseconds
bounce
explosion around 10
9
varies 10 seconds
(supernov
a)
Sorry
This video does not exist.
Neutron capture
As previously mentioned, when temperatures are sufficiently high, T ≳ 1.5 × 10 K, 9
photon energies are high enough that they can photodisintegrate nuclei. This leads to a
neutron-rich environment. Neutrons do not experience the Coulomb barrier, and under
these highly energetic conditions, they can easily penetrate the nuclei of even fully
ionised heavy elements such as Fe . If the neutrons are captured by the nucleus, as a
26+
consequence of the strong nuclear force, new neutron-rich isotopes are produced. These
isotopes may be stable or unstable. We distinguish between a slow and a rapid neutron
capture process, referred to as an s-process and an r-process, respectively. The
particular process that leads to the formation of heavy elements is determined by
the time involved in β-decay (n → p + e + ν̄ ) and the neutron capture rate.
−
e
Definition
The s-process or slow neutron capture is a nucleosynthesis process that occurs in
relatively low neutron flux and intermediate temperatures conditions in stars;
neutron flux is roughly the number of neutrons incident per unit area per unit time.
Heavier nuclei are created through neutron capture to form an isotope which may
then undergo β-decay to form a new element heavier than iron. The rate of
neutron capture is slow in comparison to the rate of β-decay.
successive neutrons to become Fe. Unlike the two lighter isotopes, iron-59 is unstable
59
with a half-life of 44.5 days. If the neutron flux is not high and neutron capture takes
longer than its half-life, iron-59 may β-decay to cobalt-59. This process can repeat
itself to form successively heavier elements, as shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7. A typical s-process during which iron turns into copper using
successive neutron capture followed by β-decay.
If the neutron flux is so high that neutrons are captured on timescales shorter than the
half-life of any of the enriched elements, super-neutron-rich isotopes can form. A typical
r-process is shown in Figure 8. The ytterbium-188 nucleus is bombarded by neutrons at
such a high rate that its isotopes do not have time to undergo β-decay until it has
absorbed eight neutrons. The half-life of ytterbium-196 is short enough to start a series
of decays which end in stable gold, Au. The neutron flux necessary for the r-process
197
Its light curve falls off sharply Its light curve has a plateau and falls
after peak luminosity, which is off more gently after peak luminosity,
comparable for all Type Ia see Figure 9.
supernovae, see Figure 9.
Type Ia supernovae Type II supernovae
Figure 9. The light curves of a Type Ia and a Type II supernova. Notice the
sharp decline after peak luminosity of the Type Ia light curve compare to
the plateau of the Type II.
Examiner Tip
While the details of Type Ia and Type II supernovae are of interest and importance,
for your exams you should be in a position to differentiate between these two types
of supernova. Thus, take particular note of Table 2 above and pay close attention
to Figure 9.