Project Chapter 2
Project Chapter 2
Project Chapter 2
Chapter two
The project Life cycle
The different stages/phases through which a project passes is called the project life cycle.
The main features and elements of this process are information gathering, analysis and decision making.
The project cycle consist of various stages in which each stage, not only is grown out of the preceding
ones, but also leads into the subsequent ones.
There is no single way of devising the different phases of a project there are many equally valid ways in
which the project cycle may be divided. There are three basic models of project life cycles they are:
1. The Baum project life cycle
2. UNIDO project life cycle
3. DEPSA project life cycle
A. The Baum project life cycle (World Bank procedures)
The first basic model of a project cycle was that of Baum developed in 1970, which has been adopted by
the World Bank and initially recognized four main stages, namely
1. Identification
2. Preparation
3. Appraisal and selection
4. Implementation
At a later stage in 1978 the author has added another stage called “Evaluation “thus making the stages 5
in number.
1. Identification Phase:
The first stage in the project life cycle is to find potentially promising projects which are worthwhile for
investment. Some of the sources of such projects are listed below:
Some projects are resource based and stem from the opportunity to make profitable use of
available resources.
Some may be market based arising from an identified demand in home or overseas markets.
Others may be need based and initiated to make available certain basic material requirements and
services to all people in an area at minimal amounts.
Well informed technical specialists and local leaders are also common source of projects.
Technical specialists will identify many areas where they feel new investment might be
profitable, while local leaders may have suggestions about where investment might be carried out.
Ideas for new projects also come from proposals to extend existing program.
2. Preparation Phase:
Once projects are identified, there begins a process of progressively more detailed analysis of the projects
and preparation of the project plans. This phase of the project life cycle which normally includes both the
prefeasibility and feasibility study .This is the stage at which the project is being seriously considered as
a definite investment action. Project preparation covers the establishment of all the technical, economic,
social, financial, institutional and environmental feasibility analyses. From the inferences of such
analysis, decisions have to be made on the scope of the project, location and site, soil and hydrological
requirements, project size etc. At this stage the project exists as asset of tangible proposals.
3. Appraisal Phase (an assessment of the quality or value of something)
At this stage critical review of the project is to be conducted. This provides an opportunity to re-examine
every aspect of the project proposal (project plan) to assess whether the proposal is appropriate and sound
before large sums are invested. Generally only internal institution/government staffs are used for this
work. Projects are appraised both in the field and at the desk level. Appraisals should cover at least seven
aspects of the project, each of which must have been given special consideration during the project
preparation stage. Those seven aspects are:
Technical- here the appraisals concentrate on verifying whether the proposed project will work in
the way suggested or not.
Financial- In this, the appraisals try to see whether requirements for money needed by the project
have been calculated properly, their sources are all identified and reasonable plans for their
repayment are made where necessary.
Commercial-the way the necessary inputs for the project are conceived to be supplied is examined
here and also the arrangements for the disposal of the products are verified.
Incentive- the appraisals here will see into it whether things are arranged in such a way that all
those whose participation is required will find it in their interest to take part in the project, at least
to the extent envisaged in the plan.
Economic- the appraisal here tries to see that what is proposed is good from the view point of the
national economic development interest when all project effects (positive and negative are taken
into account and check whether all are correctly valued.
Managerial- this aspect of the appraisal examines whether the capacity exists for operating the
project and the people who were assigned responsibilities can operate it satisfactorily or not.
Moreover, it tries to see whether the responsible persons are given sufficient power and scope to
do what is required.
Organizational- this appraisal examines the project if it is organized internally and externally into
units, contract policy institution, etc., to allow the proposals to be carried out properly and to
allow for change as the project develops.
The above issues are the subjects of specialized appraisal report. On the basis of this report, financial
decisions are made- whether to go ahead with the project or not. In practice, there can be quite a
sequence of project selection decisions. Following appraisal, some projects may be discarded. If the
project involves loan finance, the lender will almost certainly wish to carry out his own appraisal
before completing negotiations with the borrower. Comments made at the appraisal stage frequently
give rise to alterations in the project plan.
4. Implementation Phase:
The clear objective of any effort in project planning and analysis is to have a project that can be
implemented to the benefit of the society. Thus implementation is perhaps the most important part of
the project cycle. In this stage, funds are actually disbursed to get the project started and keep
running. A major priority during this stage is to ensure that the project is carried out in the way and
within the period that was planned. Problems frequently occur when the economic and financial
environment at implementation differs from the situation expected during appraisal.
It is during implementation stage that many of the real problems of projects are first identified.
Because of this feedback effect on the discovery and design of new projects, and the deficiencies in
the capabilities of the project action can be revealed. Therefore to allow the management to become
aware of the difficulties that might arise, in recording, monitoring and progress reporting are
important activities during the implementation stage.
5. Evaluation Phase:
At later stage that is in 1978, BAUM has added an additional stage called Evaluation which usually
closes the project life cycle. Once a project has been carried out, it is often useful, to look back over
what took place, to compare actual progress with the plans, to judge whether the decisions and
actions taken were corrective, to see whether the results obtained are optimal in a sense that the
resources are efficiently utilized and whether the project’s goals and objectives are effectively
achieved. The extent to which the objectives of a project are being realized provides the primary
criterion for an evaluation. The analysts look systematically at the elements of success and failure in
the project experience to obtain insights about how to plan more productive projects in future.
Evaluation is not limited only to completed projects. It is the most important managerial tool in
ongoing projects and rather formalized evaluation may take place at several times in the life of
project. Evaluation may be undertaken when a project is in trouble, as the first step in a re-planning
effort. Careful evaluation of the project should precede any effort to plan follow-up projects. Finally,
evaluation should be undertaken when a project is terminated or as well in routine operation.
Different people may do evaluation like:
Project management will be continuously evaluating its experience as implementation
proceeds.
The sponsoring agency, the operating ministry, the planning agency or an external assistance
agency may undertake evaluation.
In large and innovative projects, the project’s administrative structure may provide a separate
evaluation until responsible for monitoring the projects implementation and for bringing
problems to the attention of the project’s management.
Evaluation can help not only in the management of the project after the initial phase but also in the
planning of the future projects.
1. Pre-investment stage
It is a usual practice, project ideas must be elaborated in a more detailed study. However, formulation
of the detail techno-economic feasibility study, that enables a definite decision to be made on the
project, is a costly and time consuming task. Therefore, before assigning large funds for such a study,
a preliminary assessment of the project idea must be made in a pre-feasibility study. This is just
seeing that whether:
All possible project alternatives are examined
The project concept justifies the detail study
All aspects are critical and need in-depth investigation
The project idea is viable and attractive or not
According to the UNIDO manual, the main stages of the pre-investment phase are as follows:
Identification of investment opportunities (opportunity studies)
Analysis of project alternatives and preliminary project selection
Project preparation( pre-feasibility and feasibility studies ) and
Project appraisal and investment decision (appraisal report)
These stages assist a potential investor in the decision making process and provide the base for project
decision and implementation.
a. opportunities studies
Identification of investment opportunities is the starting point in a series of investment related activities
when potential investors (private or public) are interested in obtaining information on newly identified
viable investment opportunities. The main instrument used to quantify the parameters, information and
data required to develop a project idea into a proposal is the opportunity study. An opportunity study
should identify investment opportunities or project ideas by analyzing the following factors in detail:
Natural resources with high potential for processing and manufacture:
Existing agricultural pattern that serves as a basis for agro-based industries:
The future demand for certain consumer goods or for newly developed goods:
Imports in order to identify areas for import substitution:
Cost and availability of production factors:
Possible expansion of existing industrial capacity to attain economies of scale and
Export possibilities.
b. Pre-feasibility studies
A Pre-feasibility study should be viewed as an intermediate stage between a project opportunity study
and a detailed feasibility study. c and the intensity with which project alternatives are examined. The
structure of a prefeasibility study should be the same as that of the detailed feasibility study. These two
studies basically compile the information on the justification of the project. In a practical sense, the main
components of the project feasibility report are:
Executive summary
Project back ground and history
Market and plant capacity
Location and site
Project engineering works
Factory, administrative and sale overheads
Man power
Project implementation
Financial analysis and
Project risk analysis
C. feasibility studies
A feasibility study should provide all data necessary for making the investment decision.
The commercial, technical, financial, economic and environment prerequisites for an investment project
should therefore be defined and critically examined on the basis of alternative solutions already reviewed
in the pre-feasibility study. The results of these efforts strengthen a project whose back ground conditions
and aims have been clearly defined, in terms of its control objective and possible marketing strategies,
the possible market share that can be achieved, the corresponding production capacities, the plant
location existing raw materials, appropriate technology and mechanical equipment and, location, existing
raw materials, appropriate technology and mechanical equipment and if required an environmental
impact assessment.
The financial part of the study covers the scope of the investment, including the net working capital, the
production and marketing costs, sales revenue and the return on capital invested. The final estimates on
investment and production costs and its subsequent calculations of financial and economic profitability
are only meaningful if the scope of the project is defined in order not to omit any essential part and its
related cost. However, there is no uniform approach or pattern to cover all industrial projects of whatever
type, size or category. The emphasis on the components varies from project to project. For most
industrial projects, however, there is a broad format of general application-bearing in mind the larger the
project the more complex will be the information required.
d. Appraisal Report
When a feasibility study is completed, the various parties will carry out their own appraisal of the
investment project in accordance with their individual objectives and evaluation of expected risks, costs
and gain. Large investment and development finance institutions usually have formalized project
appraisal procedures and usually prepare an appraisal report. This is the reason why project appraisal
should be considered an independent stage of the pre-investment phase, marked by the final investment
and financing decisions taken by the project promoters.
The appraisal report will prove whether the pre production expenditures spent since the initiation of the
project idea were well spent or not. Project appraisal, as carried out by financial institutions concentrates
on the health of the company to be financed, the returns to be obtained by equity holders and the
protection of its creditors. The techniques applied to appraise projects in line with these criteria center
around technical, commercial, market, managerial, organizational, financial and if possible economic
aspects of project.
2. Investment (implementation) phase
The investment or implementation phase of a project provides a wide scope for consultancy and
engineering work, first and foremost, in the field of project management. The investment phase can be
divided into the following stages:
Technological acquisition and transfer
Detailed engineering design and contract, including tendering, evaluation of bids and negotiations
Acquisition of land, construction work and installation
Pre-production marketing, including the securing of suppliers and setting up the administration of
the firm
Recruitment and training of personnel and
Plant commissioning and start-up
Detailed engineering design comprises preparatory work for site preparation, the final selection of
construction planning and time scheduling of factory construction, as well as the preparation of flow
charts, scale drawing and a wide variety of layouts. During the stage of tendering and evaluation of bids,
it is chiefly important to receive comprehensive tenders for goods and services for the project from a
sufficiently large number of national and international supplies of proven efficiency and with good
delivery capacity.
This stage covers the signing of contracts between the investor on the one hand, and the financing
institutions, consultants, architects and supplies of raw materials and required inputs on the other.
The construction stage involves site preparation, construction of buildings and other civil works, together
with the erection and installation of equipment in accordance with proper programming and scheduling.
The personnel recruitment and training stage, which should proceed simultaneously with the construction
stage, may prove very crucial for the expected growth of productivity and efficiency in plant operations.
Plant commissioning and start up is usually a brief, but technically critical span in project
implementation.
3. Operational Phase
Replacement of equipment
Development, invasion or liquidation
Before dealing with pre –investment phase, the various stages of the investment and operational phases
are considered since these impacts on the nature and scope of pre-investment studies. The project
investment or implementation phase for a large industrial business project will be different as compared
to that of a small non- industrial project.
Assuming that a projected industrial activity involves the construction of a factory and the installation of
machinery and equipment, the project investment phase could be divided in to the following stages:
Project engineering designs
Negotiations and contracting
Construction and training and
Plant start up
An adequate importance should be given to the pre investment phase, because the success or failure of an
industrial project ultimately depends upon the marketing, technical, financial and economic feasibility
study findings and their interpretation. To reduce wastage of scarce resources, a clear comprehension of
the sequence of events is required when developing an investment proposal from the conceptual stage by
way of active promotional efforts to the operational stage.
The problem of the operational phase needs to be considered from both short and long term view points.
The short term view relates to the initial or commencement of production when a number of problems
may arise concerning such matters as the application of production techniques, operation of equipment or
inadequate labor productivity owing to lack of qualified staff and labor. Most of the problems have their
origin in the implementation phase. The long term view relates to chosen strategies and the associated
production and marketing costs as well as sales revenues. These have a direct relationship with the
productions made at the pre-investment phase. If such strategies and projections prove faulty and
remedial measures will not only be difficult, but may prove highly expensive.
C. The DEPSA Model
In Ethiopia, Development Project Studies Authority (DEPSA) made certain efforts and developed a
model for Project life cycle which is known as DEPSA’s Project life cycle. This life cycle comprises
three major phases. They are:
1. Pre-investment phase
2. Investment and
3. Operation
Each of these three phases may be divided into different stages.
The following is the summary of this classification of the project life cycle.
1. Pre- investment Phase
a. Identification Stage
b. Formulation Stage
Pre-feasibility study
Feasibility study
c. Appraisal
Appraisal
Decision
2. Investment Phase
Implementation
Tendering negotiation and contractual
Detailed engineering design
Construction, erection and commissioning
3. Operation Phase
Operation
Ex-post evaluation
1. Pre-investment phase
A. Project Identification
Projects identification amounts to finding projects, which could contribute toward achieving, specified
development objectives. Or the first stage in project cycle is to identify an idea, which enables to launch a
project. The question at this stage is where do project ideas come from?
Sources of project ideas
We can distinguish two level where projects ideas are born: the macro level and the micro level.
At the macro level project idea comes from:
National, sectoral or regional plans and strategies supplemented by special studies often
called opportunity studies, conducted with the explicit aim of translating national and
sectoral programmes into specific projects.
Frequently these questions are the subjects of a specialized appraised report. On the basis of this report,
final decisions are made about whether to go ahead with the project or not. Following appraisal, some
projects may be discarded.
2. Investment phase
Project Implementation
In this stage, funds are actually disbursed to get the project set up and running. Translating project plan
into actual investment and operation is one of the most critical and difficult task. No matter how
sophisticated or detail the project preparation work, it has no value unless it is transformed into action or
implemented.
Implementation can be defined as a project stage which covers the actual development or construction of
the project up to the point at which it becomes fully operational. It includes monitoring of all aspects of
the work or activity as it proceeds. It's where the earlier preparations and designs, plans and analysis are
tested in the highlight of reality. The project's objectives are realized only when it is successfully
implemented.
Implementation stages begins immediately after the final decision on the project and ends when it starts
rendering the benefit envisaged. While in earlier stages of project planning there was more thinking and
less action, in this stage more actions and less thinking is needed.
Project implementation, even though it may involve complex decisions, is essentially a logical and
systematic approach. Now a days planning the implementation stage of a project explicitly is one of the
activity in project preparation. The better and more realistic a project implementation plan is, the more
likely it is that the plan can be carried out effectively and the expected output or benefit realized.
Project analysts generally divide the implementation phase into three different time periods. These are:
1. The investment period: when the major project investments are undertaken.
2. The development period: when the project's production builds up.
3. The life of a project: when full development is reached.
Evaluation can be defined as a systematic and periodical gathering, analyzing and interpreting of inputs,
information to see the effects and impacts of a development programme/project in order it may be
adjusted where necessary.
This kind of analysis can help not only in the management of the project after the initial construction
phase, but will also help in the planning of future project. Experience with one project can give rise to
new ideas for extension of the project. Generally evaluation of a project helps to determine whether the
objectives sets were realistic, given the capacities with which and the circumstances in which they had to
be fulfilled, to assess the impact of the project activities.
END