In many professional sports, there is an increase in the number of

athletes using banned substances to improve their performance.

What are the causes of the phenomenon and what are some of the
possible solutions?

In many professional sports, it is becoming commonplace for athletes to

abuse prohibited substances to boost their overall performance. This
essay will discuss how stiff competition and lax testing systems are the
main cause of this problem, and the most suitable solutions are imposing
heavier punishments on violators and revamping testing facilities.

The main cause of this problem is the fierce competition that exists in any
sports. In other words, most many professional athletes feel that they
have to take substances like steroids to give themselves an advantage
over other strong opponents. Another reason is the lack of strictness in
testing procedures. Many athletes who take advantage of banned
substances can still get off scot-free due to the holes in testing systems.
For example, a high-profile mix martial artist named Jon John who is
notorious for using PED described how easy it was to get away with
cheating in an interview in 2015.

A viable solution is to heavily punish lawbreakers. If sports clubs and

establishments raise the fine for using banned substances, many athletes
will think twice before making attempt to cheat. Another the way to deal
with this issue is to upgrade testing amenities. This will eradicate any
holes existing in the system and ensure that the test result is highly
accurate. For instance, after the UFC had made major investments to
provide their staff with the latest testing equipment, many fighters in their
organization got caught.

In conclusion, strong competition and ineffective testing systems are the

main cause of this problem, and the most suitable solutions are enforcing
harsher punishments on violators and reforming testing facilities.
Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in
newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is thought that the information regarding politicians’ personal lives

should not be shared in print media. This essay strongly agrees with this
suggestion because publishing these details could be harmful to their
families, and obtaining this type of information might require breaking
the law.

First and foremost, what makes that the details related to private aspects
of politicians’ lives should not be shared in newspapers is that it could be
harmful not only to these individuals but also to their families. This is
because revealing some details from their personal lives could expose
them to unwanted comments or allegations, which might lead to a great
deal of distress. In Poland, for instance, in 2015, the vice-prime minister
committed suicide due to not handling the pressure caused by the
paparazzi invading his and his family’s private life.

Furthermore, obtaining this type of information, in most cases, means

breaking the law. This is because the right to privacy is one of the most
fundamental policies in society, and anyone who wants to access the lives
of politicians must obtain their consent. However, not only are paparazzi
hired to invade properties belonging to politicians to take photos without
their permission, but also politicians’ colleagues and relatives are bribed
to share confidential facts from their lives. For instance, an accident in
which Princess Diana was killed was partly caused by the paparazzi who
followed her car, trying to take photos of her and her boyfriend against
their will.

In conclusion, I strongly support the suggestion that politicians’ lives

should not be subject to the interest of newspapers because revealing
personal facts from politicians lives could destroy their family life and the
process of obtaining these details often required wrongdoing.
Some say that music, art and drama are as important as other school
subjects, especially at the primary level. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that arts-related subjects are as important as other

school subjects, especially for primary school children. I totally agree
with this statement because this can help children to discover their talents
from an early age and can increase their confidence.

One of the reasons I agree that creative subjects have the same
importance as other school courses in primary school is that it allows
students to find out their potential talents early on. That is to say, school-
age is the most convenient time for students to learn more about their
interests by trying different activities as they are young enough to pursue
their hobbies. They will probably not have any other chance later in their
lives to discover that because they will be busy with difficult exams when
they get older. For example, most famous singers were discovered by
their music teachers at school from a young age, and they claimed that
they could not be that successful if their teachers did not find out their
talents when they were young.

Moreover, music, art and drama subjects help students to boost their
confidence. That is because creative lessons teach students how to
perform in front of lots of people and give them a chance to socialise with
other students. As a result, students can realise their real potential and act
more confidently. For instance, many psychologists suggest to students
who are struggling with social anxiety to take drama lessons as it helps to
enhance confidence.

In conclusion, this essay completely agrees that music, art and drama
have the same value as other subjects in primary school because it allows
children to discover their hidden talents early on and increases their self-
confidence.
Some people think that parents should teach their children how to be
good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the
best place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some individuals believe that the right place to teach children how to
become good citizens is the school, while others argue that parents should
be the ones responsible for that. Although parents might influence their
children more than anyone else, I believe that educational institutions are
more trained and equipped to teach children how to become successful
members of the community.

Parents influence their children more than anyone else. This is due to the
fact that mothers and fathers are the ones who raise and spend most of the
time with their children which dramatically influences the way children
act and think. If parents act in a good manner, their children will
indirectly imitate them. This fortifies the fact that no one might exert such
a strong influence on their children. For example, a study in Britain
showed that children are two times more influenced by their parents than
their teachers. However, I believe that this is not enough and that school
should be the place teaching children to become good people in society.

Schools are trained to build good citizens. Teachers spent their

undergraduate years studying how to deal with children and train them to
become better individuals in their communities. For this reason,
educational institutions should be the place where children can safely
acquire the needed behaviors to become better individuals in the future.
For example, a recent study in the USA showed that 90% of schools train
teachers how to help students to become better citizens. For this reason, I
believe that the best place to do this is the school.

In conclusion, although parents have a strong influence on their children,

I believe that the best place to create better citizens is the school because
tutors are trained to do that.
Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in
newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that newspapers ought not to publish the details of private

lives of politicians. This essay strongly disagrees with this view because
politicians build a public image through such news and they could be held
accountable for any wrongdoings.

On the one hand, politicians can gain public trust by building a positive
image through newspapers. Being the focus of media, sometimes details
of their personal interests end up on the front pages of newspapers, which
allows them to gain popularity among masses, especially when their
interests match with the general public. Recently, the pictures of a famous
politician of Milan, while playing football with local school children were
published in many newspapers, and he instantly became famous among
school and college students. Hence, it helps them gain popularity by
depicting themselves in a positive way.

On the other hand, publishing details of private affairs disclose the

corruption of politicians and make them accountable. Many politicians
usually hold a public office and are entrusted with managing public funds.
If they do not spend the money on the wellbeing of people and are
involved in corruption, newspapers expose their private life and put them
under accountability. For example, when details of the lavish spending of
the Mayor of London, while on a vacation, were revealed in the SUN, it
prompted questions from many sections of the society, eventually
exposing his corruption with the public money. Therefore, it is important
that newspapers publish these details.

In conclusion, private matters of politicians should be published in

newspaper because it allows them to gain popularity and expose their
corrupt affairs.
Some say that music, art and drama are as important as other school
subjects, especially at the primary level. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that arts education is as significant as the study of

other subjects, especially for primary students. I completely agree with
this viewpoint because some educational content could be better
illustrated in the forms of arts, and the study of arts is one key
consideration which fosters all-rounded growth of young students.

The arts could deliver information to students, especially to those

attending primary schools, in a way that words in textbooks sometimes
cannot. Children may become bored and tired if they have to read or
listen to too much educational content in textbooks. A colorful painting or
a catchy song, on the other hand, can be much more appealing and thus
more effective in conveying information to these children. For example,
the Ghen Covy song has been taught at most schools in Vietnam and has
become one of children’s favorite songs. This song has effectively
highlighted the importance of hand washing as a means of disease
prevention, and has made it easier for many children to remember every
step of hand sanitization for its catchy melody and appealing dancing
moves.

Furthermore, the study of arts is one factor that contributes to a

comprehensive development of young students. While academic subjects
focus on children’s cognitive development, arts education help children to
develop their social-emotional skills. By singing a song or drawing a
picture, these children are likely to express their feelings and nurture their
sense of community. For example, thousands of Vietnamese children,
who were encouraged by their teaching staff, drew pictures of sunflowers
to deliver messages of love and support for pediatric cancer patients.

In conclusion, the arts can sometimes be better at transmitting knowledge

than textbooks, and the provision of both academic and arts education is
necessary for an all-rounded growth of young students. I firmly believe
that the study of arts should never be underestimated in any child
educational institution.