Advertising As A Means of Communication
Advertising As A Means of Communication
Advertising As A Means of Communication
The Von Restorff effect was identified by Hedwig von Restorff in 1933. She
conducted a set of memory experiments around isolated and distinctive items,
concluding that an isolated item, in a list of otherwise similar items, would be
better remembered than an item in the same relative position in a list where all
items were similar. There can also be a reverse effect here. You remember the
unique item, but the attention that it grabs from you is removed from other items
thus you may in fact remember less overall. Hedwig’s work relates to Gestalt,
where she related it to the Figure and Ground principles. Attention is usually
captured by salient, novel, surprising, or distinctive stimuli. These may be used
to enhance the von Restorff effect. In the ‘attention age’, when the plethora of
media around us is constantly battling for a moment of our time, advertisers make
much use of this principle, each vying with the other to stand out from the crowd
and hence be remembered by the target audience. The Von Restorff effect is also
called the Isolation Effect or the Distinctiveness Principle. The same principle
has also been described as prominence effects.
In broader term, for both, customer and manufacturing products firms, a firm’s
ability to distinguish its products as of competitors and to build success brands is
critical for achievement. As a consequence, firms may use more on their
marketing infrastructure to raise the sales by attracting more consumers to the
product group as a whole as healthy as by convincing current consumers to switch
their purchases as of competitor’s products to the firm’s brand. Moreover, firms
by means of strong brand names may be clever to charge best prices based on the
additional worth of the brand which would too improve the firm’s profitability.
Therefore, firms that connect in heavy marketing communication activities in
advertising may show performance that is improved than those investing less
powerfully in marketing infrastructure.
In a bigger scenario the advertisement is treated from two viewpoints: as
advertisement specialists and customers. Advertisement specialists create
decisions incident to preparation, creation and transmission of the advertisement.
Customers on the other hand act in response to the advert which advertisement
specialists have produced and the presented them. Following incorporating these
two perspectives we be able to state that constant communication of advert and
customer is experiential in the advertisement procedure. As marketing specialists
move particular message to the customers while advertise incredible, the
advertisement might be called communication procedure
There has been a strong support for the espousal of consumer retention in as one
of the key performance indicators in Von Restorff effect. It has found that there
is a high association between customer retention and the profit earn by the
industries. The fragmentation of media choices and the active nature of the
marketplace, tied with an enlarged number of additional demanding and
prosperous consumers, brought bigger challenges to marketing practitioners in
keeping hold of their regular customers. An advertisement may provide
information about a brand on several attributes. Attention getting services such
as bold type and arrows can draw attention to a particular attribute and away from
others. Advertisement induced recalls may or may not translate into product use
during a subsequent brand evaluation. Marketers have implicitly assumed that
people who see advertisements encouraging recall of specific brand attributes will
increase their use of that information for brand evaluation. One example of this
is using recall of a claim to test advertisement effectiveness. Yet research in social
cognition indicates that enhanced recall of an attribute does not necessarily imply
increased emphasis on that attribute during a subsequent brand evaluation in Von
Restorff effect.
In advertising, to get the attention of the packaging is the most important medium
of communication because it reaches almost all buyers in the category and is
present at the crucial moment when procurement decision is made; and buyers
are actively involved with packaging as they examine it to obtain the information
they need. A well suited packaging material works as an instrument to
differentiate a product from a wide range of other products having similar
qualities and helps customers to finalize his buying behavior. It can be claimed
that package performs a vital role in marketing connections and can be treated as
one of the most major feature to pursue consumer’s purchase judgment. In this
context, seeking to optimize the effectiveness of package in a buying place, the
researches of package, its elements and their impact on consumer’s buying
behaviour became a relevant issue.
Due to emergent self-service and altering customers’ standard of living, their life
style the awareness in package that includes size, quantity, color, shape as a
mechanism of sales advertising and stimulator of spontaneous purchasing
behavior is rising more and more. So package carries out an imperative role in
advertising communications, in particular in the spot of sale and it is treated as
the most significant features influence purchase decision of consumers. Earlier
study has shown that there is no agreement on categorization of package basics
as well as package impact on purchase decision of consumers.
Color is one of the most important non verbal signs. The impact of colors for the
marketers through advertisement is very well recognized. When it is about
products, it is become aware as one of the foreseeable signs of the whole look of
products that also have an impact on the sales success of a product. Nowadays, it
is fairly clear that products must not be designed just in order to meet up the
functional needs of the customers but at the same time it must be attractive and
eye catching as well. That is the main reason design is accentuate as a key
marketing element. Conversely, colors do not merely lie in the aesthetics as it is
strained that colors have two additional essential functions from a marketing
viewpoint. The first use, it is suggested that colors draw attention to themselves
by implying that color is the most necessary visual element in advertising. The
subsequent purpose of colors that is highlighted is the position of colors as a way
of communication. Hence, it is declared that colors have the skill to express
meanings predominantly while it comes to such marketing phenomenon as
advertising and packaging.
The graphics are any lines, metaphors, symbols, snaps, and text that narrate to the
brand name. The most ordinary graphics in advertising are applications of
figurative representation and abstract symbolization with the exclusion that make
use of design drawings the most. Characteristics of design fundamentals may be
grouped as functional and visual elements. Visual include form, text, pictures,
colors and decorations and functional elements comprise structural designs (store,
protect, reclose and open), material designs (display value and emotional appeal),
volume designs (economy). Advertisement must also draw customer attention
with visual elements that please consumer psychosomatic desires other than their
main functionalities
Self perceptions of familiarity may affect the individual’s use of stored product
class knowledge to interpret and integrate new brand information. This approach
to familiarity is phenomenological; it focuses on the individual’s subjective
perceptions rather than on an objectively verifiable reality. There is evidence that
self perceptions of familiarity are not equivalent to objective measures of
expertise or knowledge and that these self perceptions affect processing. If
prominence directs subjects’ attention to a key attribute, it may direct attention
away from other, non prominent attributes in the ad and this may, in turn, decrease
recall of non prominent attributes.
Customer satisfaction and retention are the key elements for the planning of the
marketing in view of the fact that satisfaction does sway customer’s intention to
re-patronage the restaurant. Therefore, marketers are supposed to look into the
issues that would have an effect on customer satisfaction intensity. Besides, as
customer prospect are altering over time and it is advised to determine the
customer satisfaction and expectation on regular basis and grip complaints timely
and effectively.
Self perceptions of familiarity may affect the individual’s use of stored product
class knowledge to interpret and integrate new brand information. This approach
to familiarity is phenomenological; it focuses on the individual’s subjective
perceptions rather than on an objectively verifiable reality. There is evidence that
self-perceptions of familiarity are not equivalent to objective measures of
expertise or knowledge and that these self perceptions affect processing. Those
who consider themselves familiar with a product (high subjective familiarity)
may feel they have stored criteria for brand evaluation. They are aware of their
stored product knowledge and may use it to interpret and integrate attribute
information presented in an advertisement. In contrast, consumers who consider
themselves unfamiliar with a product (low subjective familiarity) may feel they
lack stored evaluative criteria. Such consumer may not attempt to use whatever
knowledge they do have when presented with data about a new brand, feeling that
it is useless to try to evaluate such information. Product specific attributes may
seem confusing and meaningless; instead, they may use information in the
advertisement that is not product-specific. In some cases, they may use
information about attributes that are normally used to evaluate objects in a more
general class of products to which the unfamiliar product belongs or is related.
For example, a consumer who feels s/he doesn’t know anything about shaving
cream might use attributes appropriate for evaluating toiletries in general-such as
scent-or those frequently found useful in evaluating products in general, such as
price. In other cases s/he may, consciously or unconsciously, base brand attitude
on evaluation of the advertisement itself.
A brand’s advertising can affect both the brand attributes recalled and those used
for subsequent evaluations. In addition, advertisement induced recall due to an
attention focusing tactic does not necessarily imply increased emphasis on that
attribute during a subsequent brand evaluation. This suggests that it is useful for
marketers to distinguish between processing which leads to recall and that which
leads to attitude formation. The results imply that availability and use in attitude
formation are not equivalent; elicitation procedures may not be appropriate
techniques for obtaining the attributes used to evaluate brands.
For year’s advertisers and consumer behaviour researchers have studied the
effects of advertisement on recall, attitude, and other evaluations related to the ad
and the brand. This includes cognitive responses, such as attention, recall, brand
preference, and brand evaluation. These areas of research reflect the growing
convictions of many advertisers that consumers liking and disliking of an ad can
influence its effectiveness regarding attention, recall, brand evaluations, other
cognitive related responses, and reactions. For decision alternatives, consumers
consistently acquire product information on product brand attributes available to
them. Such information in marketing communications is often conveyed either in
numerical and verbal modes or both. Results from past studies on information
mode showed that judgments of numerical estimates and verbal expressions vary
considerably across subjects. Despite the increasing importance of numerical
information in marketing, the marketing and advertising literature is scant on the
effects of numerical attribute information on consumer evaluation of products. In
addition, research on the relationship between presentation forms and information
mode has not been reviewed in the past, despite the growing importance of
numerical attribute information and the persuasive nature of vividness in
advertising. Hence, the importance of vividness in terms of ad evaluation is of
interest. Although the effects of presentation form, vividness, in terms of its
persuasive communication has yielded mixed results, this research attempts to
examine and discuss the role of vividness and the mode of information used with
the inclusion of a moderator, consumer knowledge, as a determinant of how
consumers respond to product advertisement.
Effects of advertising have been examined in the past, although, the influence of
numerical versus verbal information content in advertising has not been
examined. Studies in the area of information mode have primarily compared
numerical information to verbal information with respect to information
processing, memory, preference, and comparative judgments. Although studies
have examined various aspects of advertising message content and format, none
of the studies in the literature cited has made an attempt to measure subjects’
attitude toward to ad, and recall tested for all verbal and all numerical modes. On
the other hand, some studies have compared the differences between visual and
verbal information and their effects on brand attitude prior to the studies focusing
on the comparison of verbal and numerical information. Other researchers have
examined the differences between verbal message format and visual formats in
terms of their effects on information processing, memory and evaluations
concerning the product.