Asmaa Proposal-Final PDF
Asmaa Proposal-Final PDF
Asmaa Proposal-Final PDF
Faculty of Education,
Department of Curriculum & Instruction (TEFL)
A Proposal
Submitted for registration of the master’s degree in Education,
Curriculum & Instruction (TEFL).
Prepared by
Asmaa Gamal Mahmoud Abdel Rahman
English Language Supervisor, Ministry of Education, El Dakhla Governorate.
Supervised by
2025
1
Introduction:
One of the writing genres that EFL students are assigned is the
argumentative writing. It is the most complex mode (Baker, 2016) define
argumentative writing as a genre of writing that requires the student to
investigate a topic; collect, generate, and evaluate evidence; and establish a
position on the topic in a concise manner.
2
Argumentative writing is highly effective in demonstrating critical
thinking as students analyze, assess, and give counter-argumentation to
opposing views to persuade the reader (Nikou, 2015). Nippold and Ward-
Lonergan 2016, note that argumentative writing is a challenging
communication task that needs sophisticated cognitive and linguistic
abilities . According to (Richards and Schmidt, 2010), argumentative writing
is an attempt to back a controversial issue or defend a disputable opinion. In
argumentation, students are required to perform rigorous intellectualism
with a critical perspective. Thus, the crucial component necessary for
teaching argumentative writing is that of critical thinking.
Researchers have determined that argumentative writing is the most
difficult form of writing . Argumentative writing is highly demanded in
learning assignments, but unfortunately, most EFL students have difficulty
arguing for or against a thesis statement, in which they are required to find
evidence to back up the claim presented and provide evidence to persuade
readers of a controversial issue or adopt a particular action. Additionally,
this type of writing is crucial for students who need to express themselves in
academically acceptable ways and strategies ( Liu 2016 ; Alkholi 2017;
Zahran 2018; , Houari 2019; Obidi 2021; Shahsavar ,2022). Unfortunately,
EFL students often struggle to write argumentatively (Thepsiri &
Pojanapunya, 2020)
3
that the strength of an argumentative essay lies in its ability to support its
claims with solid evidence. This evidence can take many forms, including
facts, statistics, examples, anecdotes, and expert testimony. When presenting
evidence, it is important to explain how it supports your argument and to
address any potential counterarguments .
4
accomplish the assigned learning tasks. According to the social cognitive
perspective, self-regulation is the outcome of interaction among three
factors: learner’s beliefs, autonomous behavior, and the surrounding
learning environment. Moreover, self-regulation encompasses three
dimensions: self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and self-reaction. As self-
regulated learning is viewed as a reflection of students’ will and skill, it is
considered a valid means not only of justifying the students’ achievement
differences but also of improving their overall achievement. Therefore, the
current study assumes a positive relationship between students’ achievement
and their self-regulated learning skills.
According to (Little, 2017) , students who possess self-regulatory learning
skills are expected to assume more responsibility for their learning,
participate actively in learning tasks, monitor and assess their own progress,
and eventually achieve the learning outcomes successfully. Also, Vu ,
(2016) , considers self-regulated learning skills a ubiquitous part of teaching
literature as students are supposed to be cognitively and emotionally
involved in constructing the meaning of literary works. Similarly, self-
regulation in an online environment is expected to play a vital role in the
learning process. Unexpectedly, developing online self-regulatory learning
skills has not received adequate attention. This reveals the necessity to
explore a new methodology that would enable teachers to teach literary texts
appropriately in order to achieve the intended objectives and foster students’
online self-regulated language learning skills at the same time.
In this context ,(Charles Duhigg in his book The Power of Habit, 2012
and Johnson, 2018 ), emphasize the role of self-regulation in habit
formation. He argues that by understanding the neurological loops that
5
underpin habits, we can develop strategies to control our impulses and
replace unhealthy behaviors with healthier ones . The ability to self-regulate
is essential for effective argumentative writing. Learners who can set goals,
monitor their progress, and make adjustments as needed are more likely to
produce high-quality arguments .
6
telephone or VOIP (Internet Telephoning), e-mail, video conferencing,
instant messaging or other media. Through this experience, you learn your
partner's language while he or she learns your native language.
(http://www.languages.dk )
George 2000, showed that by providing a virtual platform for learners to
engage in authentic communication with native speakers, e-tandem offers a
unique opportunity to enhance writing proficiency and foster a more positive
attitude towards writing. Also Lee 2020 , added that E-tandem provides a
safe and supportive environment for students to practice writing in a real-
world context, which can help to reduce writing anxiety and improve
fluency.
7
develop a deeper understanding of the nuances of language and are better
able to express their ideas clearly and persuasively.
Chen (2021), Lee (2022) & Smith (2023) mentioned that E-tandem can
help learners develop self-regulation skills by providing opportunities for
goal setting, time management, and monitoring their own progress. By
setting specific goals for their e-tandem interactions, learners can develop a
sense of agency and motivation. The collaborative nature of e-tandem can
foster critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are crucial for
effective argumentative writing. Learners are required to consider different
perspectives, evaluate the validity of arguments, and articulate their own
positions in a persuasive manner. Through e-tandem interactions, students
develop a deeper understanding of the nuances of language and culture,
enabling them to construct more sophisticated and persuasive arguments in
their writing.
The same point was stressed by Kim 2020 , said that the asynchronous
nature of e-tandem allows learners to set their own pace and manage their
time effectively. This can help them develop self-discipline and time
management skills, which are essential for successful academic
performance. To sum up, the present study tries to suggest a program based
8
on e-tandem approach to develop English secondary students’ argumentative
writing and self-regulation.
9
To obtain more information about this problem the researcher conducted a
pilot study in which an argumentative writing test was administered on a
group of secondary stage students . The test and the interview reveal the
following remarks:
- Genres of writing are limited to descriptive and narrative writings.
Argumentative writing is neglected.
- Topics of writing are boring and not controversial.
- Writing tasks are considered home assignments; students focus on
the final product and it is an individual activity.
- Most students feel anxious and fearful in the writing task. They
expressed their disability to write correct sentences.
- Students' views about their writing are unclear and lack
appreciation.
To investigate argumentative writing difficulties among secondary
stage students, the researcher used a diagnostic argumentative writing test.
The test applied to 30 students from the third year, at a secondary school
in El Dakhla. The test consisted of two writing prompts; students select
one prompt to write about. The students writing were corrected according
to Oxford argumentative writing performance rubrics (2023) which
covers the following main traits: mechanics- thesis development- thesis-
organization- point of view . The results revealed the following:
65 % of the students failed in expressing a thesis statement that is explaining their
points of view and their position on the argumentative topic ; 72% of the students
could not support their views with appropriate reasons and clues ; 83% failed in
organizing the argumentative writing logically and 84% failed to review various
perspectives on the topic.
10
As a result of the researcher's observation, the piloting tools were
conducted to know the level of argumentative writing skills of English
majors. The present study tries to use a suggested program based on e-
tandem based program to teach argumentative writing courses to secondary
stage students .
Based on these findings, the researcher proposed an e-tandem approach as
a potential solution to improve students' argumentative writing and self-
regulation skills. This approach involves pairing students from different
language backgrounds to collaborate on writing tasks and provide feedback
to each other.
The problem of the present study could be stemmed from secondary stage
students’ weakness in argumentative writing skills and self-regulated
language learning skills too . Accordingly, the researcher investigates the
effectiveness of using a suggested program based on e-tandem to develop
argumentative writing and self-regulated language learning skills secondary
students’ , at Mout secondary school in El Dakhla .
12
Second, it addresses a critical need in education. Argumentative writing
and self-regulation are essential skills for students to succeed in academic
and professional settings. The study seeks to provide evidence-based
insights into how these skills can be effectively developed through the e-
tandem approach.
Third, it aligns with broader educational goals. By promoting the use of
technology in education, the study supports efforts to modernize teaching
and learning practices and prepare students for the challenges of the 21st
century.
Finally, it contributes to the body of knowledge on language learning and
technology. The findings of this study may inform future research and
inform the development of new language learning resources and
methodologies.
13
The researcher is going to prepare, validate and conduct the following
tools and materials to achieve the objectives of the present study:
1. Test of argumentative writing skills .
2. A scale of Self-regulated language learning skills.
3. A suggested program based on e-tandem.
Research variables
Definition of Terms:
E-tandem:
An e-tandem is a language learning approach and partnership between
two people who are native speakers of each other's language. This
partnership involves regular communication and interaction, often through
online platforms, to practice speaking, listening, and writing in the target
language. It's like having a language exchange partner, but done digitally.
14
A language learning approach where learners from different language
backgrounds partner online to practice their respective languages (eTandem
Learning, 2023) .
Argumentative writing:
Argumentative writing is a type of writing that presents a claim or thesis
and then supports it with evidence and reasoning. It involves constructing a
logical argument, considering counterarguments, and persuading the reader
to accept your viewpoint. It's often used in academic essays and debates.
It is a process of inquiry and persuasion. It involves investigating a topic
in depth, formulating a thesis, gathering evidence to support that thesis, and
presenting your argument in a clear, logical, and persuasive manner ( David
Williamson, 2015) .
A type of writing that presents a particular viewpoint and supports it with
evidence and reasoning (National Council of Teachers of English, 2014)
15
Procedures of the study:
1- Reviewing the literature and previous studies related to e-tandem,
argumentative writing, and self-regulation skills .
2- Preparing and validating materials and tools for the proposed study.
3- Selecting the sample of the study and dividing them into two equivalent
groups: experimental and control group.
4- Pre-assessment of argumentative writing proficiency and self-
regulation skills for both groups.
5- Implementing e-tandem activities with the experimental group.
6- Post-assessment of argumentative writing proficiency and self-
regulation skills for both groups.
7- Statistical analysis of the obtained data.
8- Analyzing and discussing the results.
9- Conclusion, recommendations, and suggestions for further research .
References
16
Barnard-Brak L., Paton V. O., and Lan W. Y., Profiles in self-regulated learning in
the online learning environment, International Review of Research in Open and
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education.
Routledge
17
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360193055_Employing_e-
tandem_language_learning_method_to_enhance_speaking_skills_and_willingness_t
o_communicate_the_case_of_EFL_learners
Lee, J. (2016). Exploring EFL learners' writing anxiety: A qualitative study. Journal
of English Language Teaching, 50(2), 177-196.
Lee, Y.-J. (2014). The effects of e-tandem on EFL learners' speaking and writing
skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning, 7(1), 1-18.
18
Liu, Y. (2021). The impact of online language exchange on English language
learners' motivation and learning outcomes. International Journal of English
Language Teaching, 9(1), 1-18.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Baker, W. J. (2010). The effects of anxiety on second language
learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 275-305.
Manso M., Caeiro M., and Llamas M., Analysis of self-regulated learning strategies
oriented to the design of software supportFrontiers in Education (FIE), 2014,
Aprobada Pendiente de publicación, Madrid.
Rahimi, A., & Fathi, A. (2022). Employing e-tandem language learning method to
enhance speaking skills and willingness to communicate: The case of EFL learners.
ResearchGate.
Rahimi, M., & Fathi, M. (2022). The Impact of E-Tandem on EFL Learners' Writing
Skills. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 123-138.
Resnik, D., & Schallmoser, D. (2019). The Role of E-Tandem in Reducing Foreign
Language Anxiety. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 457-472.
19
Şahin-Kızıl A. and Savran Z., Self-regulated learning in the digital age: an EFL
perspective, Novitas-Research on Youth and Language. (2016) 10, no. 2, 147–158.
Vasallo, M. A., & Telles, D. (2006). The Tandem Approach in Foreign Language
Learning: A Theoretical Perspective. Revista de Investigación, 28(1), 121-132.
Writing Anxiety and EFL Learners: Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new
psychology of success. Random House.
Zhang, L., & Ma, X. (2015). The influence of anxiety on EFL learners' writing
performance. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(2), 183-196.
Zhang, Y. (2018). The impact of online writing instruction on EFL learners' writing
anxiety and performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(2), 151-170.
20
Zimmerman B. J., Academic studying and the development of personal skill: a self-
regulatory perspective, Educational Psychologist. (1998) 33, 73–86,
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_3.
21