ARTIGO, Nanotechnology in Gastrointestinal Endos
ARTIGO, Nanotechnology in Gastrointestinal Endos
ARTIGO, Nanotechnology in Gastrointestinal Endos
net/publication/259189067
CITATION READS
1 1,327
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ashish Kumar Jha on 27 January 2014.
has ability to evade the interception by immune system, and colonic cancer), (c) gene therapy in gastric and colonic cancers,
therefore have longer half‑life and can be used as drug delivery (d) hepatoproteonomics [gene expression (genomics) and protein
vehicle.[7] NPs is acceptable to tumor cells and therefore, production (Proteomics)] and (e) gastrointestinal endoscopy.[30-38]
useful in cancer treatment.[8] It can specifically interact with
biomolecules both on the cell surface and within the cell and Nanotechnology and gastrointestinal endoscopy
can deliver diagnostic and therapeutic agents to specific cells Nanopowder as hemostatic agent in gastric ulcer
and organelles. Because of these unique properties of NPs and bleed
the inherent nanoscale functions of the biological components Endoscopic hemostasis by electrocautery, injection tamponade
of living cells, nanotechnology can be applied to medical fields. and hemoclips has been established as the treatment of choice
for peptic ulcer bleeding. However, endoscopic hemostasis
The various classes of nanomaterials are being developed can be difficult and unsuccessful in situation of severe active
for use in medical sciences and includes liposome’s, stealth bleeding and difficult anatomy. Giday et al. used a novel
liposome’s, emulsions, micelle, polymer‑drug conjugates, nanopowder (TC‑325) application in spurting arterial bleed
biocompatible ceramic NPs with porous characteristics (silica, in stomach in an animal model at endoscopy and showed its
titania, and alumina), metallic particles (iron‑oxide NPs, safety and high effectiveness in achieving hemostasis in an
gold shell NPs, nanocrystalline silver and aluminosilicate anticoagulated severe arterial gastrointestinal bleeding.[34] In
NPs), quantum Dots, calcium phosphate NPs, carbon NPs another prospective pilot clinical study, 20 patients of peptic
(fullerenes and nanotubes), nanocapsules, nanogels, dendrimer, ulcer bleeding (Forrest score Ia or Ib) underwent endoscopic
nanoshell, nanopores, nanodevices and nanomachines application of hemospray within 24 hours of hospital
(nanobots, nanotweezers, smart scalpels and intelligent admission. Hemostasis was achieved in 95% of patients. The
pill).[9‑27] Few of these have been approved by the Food and one patient in whom acute hemostasis was not successful
Drug Administration (FDA) for use in humans such as had a Forrest Ia ulcer. Bleeding recurred in 2 patients within
iron oxide (Feridex and Resovist for MRI contrast in liver), 72 hours. No major complications were reported during 30‑day
gold (Verigene for in vitro diagnostics in genetics), protein follow‑up. Limitation of study was that the only spurter of this
(Abraxane for breast cancer therapy), liposome (Doxil/Caelyx study did not respond to therapy.[35] Hemospray if revalidated
for various cancer therapy), and polymer (Oncaspar for acute appears simple, easy to use and effective method of endoscopic
lymphoblastic leukemia therapy). Some of these nonmaterial’s treatment of active gastrointestinal bleeding.
are currently undergoing clinical trials such as iron oxide
(Combidex for MRI contrast and Nano Therm for cancer Prevention of clogging of plastic stents
therapy), gold (Aurimmune for cancer therapy), nanoshells Endoscopic placement of biliary plastic stents is widely applied
(Auroshell for cancer therapy), quantum dot (Qdots, EviTags in the management of malignant and benign biliary disorders.
and semiconductor nanocrystals for fluorescent contrast However, the major limitation of plastic stents for biliary
in vitro diagnostic), polymer (CALAA‑01 for cancer therapy), drainage is their occlusion by sludge. The biliary plastic stents
dendrimer (VivaGel for microbicide) and micelle (Genexol‑PM are occluded by sludge because stents surface allows adherence
for cancer therapy).[28] of protein, glycoproteins or bacteria. Nanotechnology provides
new possibilities for the modification of surface by soil‑release
Nanotechnology and gastrointestinal tract phenomenon (the lotus effect‑ lotus leaves stay clean because
Gastrointestinal tract is one of the portals for environmental easily flowing water takes any particle from surface). Sol‑gel
NPs to enter the human body. Once ingested it readily traverse technology allows for systematic design of abrasion‑stable
through mucus layer and comes into contact with enterocytes. nanometer‑thin coating with determined physical and chemical
They are scavenged by M‑cells overlying the intestinal mucosa characteristics. An in vitro study has shown, sludge deposition
and therefore escape from active uptake by enterocytes. After to be reduced on biliary plastic stent made of teflon with
cellular trafficking it can reach the blood stream and distribute sol‑gel coating consisting of organic epoxide of 190 g/mol, or
all over the body. Faster diffusion through mucus layer is 500 g/mol and propylaminosilane as comparison to uncoated
explained by smaller diameter of NPs.[29] teflon and clear coating. The nanocoating of plastic stents may
therefore, prevent biliary plastic stents from clogging.[36]
Each part of gastrointestinal tract has distinct feature and
application of diagnostics and therapeutics is not always Nano‑based capsule‑endoscopy
easy, as the targeted delivery of drugs or endoscopy in Capsule endoscopy is a widely accepted new tool in the
distal small intestine is still far from perfection. Knowing diagnosis of small‑bowel and colonic diseases. The procedure
the properties of NPs, application of nanotechnology in is easy to perform and is well accepted by patients. Major
gastrointestinal tract appears promising. It has been tried in limitations of capsule endoscopy are inability to detect deep
many gastrointestinal conditions with varied success, such as; tissue disorders and absence of therapeutic capability.
(a) targeted delivery of therapeutic agents in terminal ileum and
colon (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease) and stomach (e.g. gastric The concept of merging two technological platforms:
ulcer), (b) theragnostic use in cancer (e.g. pancreatic, gastric and nanotechnology for targeting and marking the affected organ
Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
S78 Vol 3 | Supplement | January 2012
Jha, et al.: Nanotechnology in gastrointestinal endoscopy
and capsule‑endoscopy to detect the marked disorder has disorders such as hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus related
recently been addressed. Nano‑based capsule‑Endoscopy liver disease, inflammatory bowel disease, gastric ulcer, and
with Molecular Imaging and Optical biopsy, (NEMO) malignancy. Application of this technology appears promising
project, supported by European Union is trying to integrate in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy such as the endoscopic
optical technology with nano‑technology, bio‑sensing and hemostasis of peptic ulcer bleeding, prevention of clogging
maneuvering technology to create a capsule endoscope capable of plastic stent and advance capsule endoscopy. The diversity
of secretion analysis and the detection of marked and deep of NPs, technical difficulties and potential adverse effects
tissue disorders.[37] This may be useful especially in highlighting however, represent the major challenges.
cancerous and precancerous lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.
In conclusion, the nanotechnology has emerged as a technical
Nanorobots are innovative nanometric robots potentially tool that enables us to keep the pace of advancement in
capable of endoscopic procedures. The ultra‑sound transducers, diagnostics and therapeutics with the rapid progress of science
bioanalytical and mechanical sensors and robotic arms could and technology. We can hope that some of our unachieved
be combined in capsule endoscopy system (called as “robotic dreams in diagnostics and therapeutic field of gastrointestinal
beetle”) to obtain tissue samples and provide treatment such sciences will be fulfilled by use of this technology.
as targeted drug releasing and thermal tissue destruction.[31]
References
The investigators have planned to develop intelligent
endoscopic capsules (miniaturised robotic pill) with diagnostic 1. Terminology for nanomaterials. Publicly available specification 136.
and therapeutic capability. Concept is based on advancement London: British Standards Institute; 2007.
in micro‑ and nanotechnology. The functional units of the 2. Jain KK. Role of nanobiotechnology in developing personalized medicine
for cancer therapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005a;4:645‑50.
VECTOR capsule consists of the basic capsule functions,
3. Council of the Canadian Academies. Small is different: A science
locomotion systems, diagnostic systems and therapeutic/biopsy perspective on the regulatory challenges of the nanoscale. July 2008.
systems.[38] 4. Thorek DL, Chen A, Czupryna J, Tsourkas A. Superparamagnetic iron
oxide nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging. Ann Biomed Eng
Toxicity of nanoparticles 2006;34:23‑38.
The properties, which make NPs so useful in medical science, 5. Resch‑Genger U, Grabolle M, Cava‑liere‑Jaricot S, Nitschke R, Nann T.
Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nat Methods
may contribute to the potential toxicity in human being. 2008;5:763‑75.
The respiratory system, blood, central nervous system, 6. Costantino L, Gandolfi F, Tosi G, Rivasi F, Vandelli MA, Forni F.
gastrointestinal tract and skin have been shown to be targeted Peptide‑derivatized biodegradable nanoparticles able to cross the
by NPs. Because of easy of entry, gastrointestinal tract is blood‑brain barrier. J Control Release 2005;108:84‑96.
easily exposed to environmental NPs. Environmental factors 7. Zolnik BS, González‑Fernández A, Sadrieh N, Dobrovolskaia MA.
Nanoparticles and the immune system. Endocrinology 2010;151:458‑65.
of nanosize are putative risk factor for inflammatory bowel
8. Cuenca AG, Jiang HB, Hochwald SN, Delano M, Cance WG,
disease.[39] Recent in vivo and in vitro studies have shown that Grobmyer SR. Emerging implications of nanotechnology on cancer
liver injury can be caused by nanomaterials.[40] Therefore, diagnostics and therapeutics. Cancer 2006;107:459‑66.
the potential toxicity in human being cannot be denied. 9. Donaldson K, Aitken R, Tran L, Stone V, Duffin R, Forrest G, et al.
The nanomaterials which are either approved for clinical Carbon nanotubes: A review of their properties in relation to pulmonary
toxicology and workplace safety. Toxicol Sci 2006;92:5‑22.
use or under clinical trials have been shown to have adverse
10. Hussain SM, Javorina A, Schrand AM, Duhart H, Ali SF, Schlager JJ.
effects such as back pain, vasodilatation and acute urinary The interaction of manganese nanoparticles with PC‑12 cells induces
retention (Iron oxide), fever (Gold), cytopenia (Protein), dopamine depletion. Toxicol Sci 2006;92:456‑63.
hand–foot syndrome and stomatitis (Liposome), mild renal 11. Hofheinz RD, Gnad‑Vogt SU, Beyer U, Hochhaus A. Liposomal
toxicity, urticaria and rash (Polymer), abdominal pain and encapsulated anti‑cancer drugs. Anticancer Drugs 2005;16:691‑707.
dysuria (Dendrimer) and peripheral sensory neuropathy and 12. Moghimi SM, Szebeni J. Stealth liposomes and long circulating
nanoparticles: Critical issues in pharmacokinetics, opsonization and
neutropenia (Micelle).[28] protein‑binding properties. Prog Lipid Res 2003;42:463‑78.
13. Sarker DK. Engineering of nanoemulsions for drug delivery. Curr Drug
Deliv 2005;2:297‑310.
Summary 14. Lee LJ. Polymer nano‑engineering for biomedical applications. Ann
Biomed Eng 2006;34:75‑88.
Nanotechnology is the understanding, control of matter
15. Cherian AK, Rana AC, Jain SK. Self‑assembled carbohydrate stabilized
and development of engineered devices in nanometer range. ceramic nanoparticles for the parenteral delivery of insulin. Drug Dev
NPs have different physicochemical properties (small size, Ind Pharm 2000;26:459‑63.
large surface area to volume ratio, and high reactivity) in 16. Gupta AK, Gupta M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide
comparison to bulk materials of the same composition. The nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 2005;26:3995‑4021.
nanotechnology has proved its usefulness in early diagnosis, 17. Hirsch LR, Gobin AM, Lowery AR, Tam F, Drezek RA, Halas NJ, et al.
Metal nanoshells. Ann Biomed Eng 2006;34:15‑22.
proteonomics, imaging diagnostics and multifunctional
18. Alt V, Bechert T, Steinrücke P, Wagener M, Seidel P, Dingeldein E, et al.
therapeutics. Recent studies have shown its role in early An in vitro assessment of the antibacterial properties and cytotoxicity
diagnosis and targeted therapy of various gastrointestinal of nanoparticulate silver bone cement. Biomaterials 2004;25:4383‑91.
19. Chen X, Schluesener HJ. Nanosilver: A nanoproduct in medical 32. Yang L, Mao H, Cao Z, Wang A, Peng X, Wang X, et al. Molecular imaging
application. Toxicol Lett 2008;176:1‑12. of pancreatic cancer in an animal model using targeted multifunctional
20. Liu Y, Pinnavaia TJ. Aluminosilicate nanoparticles for catalytic nanoparticles. Gastroenterology 2009;136:1514‑25.
hydrocarbon cracking. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:2376‑7. 33. Liu T, Zhang G, Chen YH, Chen Y, Liu X, Peng J, et al. Tissue specific
21. Weng J, Ren J. Luminescent quantum dots: A very attractive and expression of suicide genes delivered by nanoparticles inhibits gastric
promising tool in biomedicine. Curr Med Chem 2006;13:897‑909. carcinoma growth. Cancer Biol Ther 2006;5:1683‑90.
22. Pagona G, Tagmatarchis N. Carbon nanotubes: Materials for medicinal 34. Giday SA, Kim Y, Krishnamurty DM, Ducharme R, Liang DB,
chemistry and biotechnological applications. Curr Med Chem Shin EJ, et al. Long‑term randomized controlled trial of a novel
2006;13:1789‑98. nanopowder hemostatic agent (TC‑325) for control of severe arterial
23. Goldberg M, Langer R, Jia X. Nanostructured materials for applications upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a porcine model. Endoscopy
in drug delivery and tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2011;43:296‑9.
2007;18:241‑68. 35. Sung JJ, Luo D, Wu JC, Ching JY, Chan FK, Lau JY, et al. Early clinical
24. West JL, Halas NJ. Applications of nanotechnology to biotechnology experience of the safety and effectiveness of Hemospray in achieving
commentary. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2000;11:215‑7. hemostasis in patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Endoscopy
25. Hirsch LR, Stafford RJ, Bankson JA, Sershen SR, Rivera B, Price RE, et al. 2011;43:291‑5.
Nanoshell‑mediated near‑infrared thermal therapy of tumors under 36. Seitz U, Block A, Schaefer AC, Wienhold U, Bohnacker S, Siebert K,
magnetic resonance guidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:13549‑54. et al. Biliary stent clogging solved by nanotechnology? in vitro study of
26. Bagshawe KD, Sharma SK, Springer CJ, Antoniw P, Boden JA, Rogers GT. inorganic‑organic sol‑gel coatings for teflon stents. Gastroenterology
Antibody directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) — clinical report. 2007;133:65‑71.
Dis Markers 1991;9:233‑8. 37. European FP6 project NEMO, Nano‑Based Capsule‑Endoscopy with
27. Vingerhoeds MH, Haisma HJ, van MM, van de Rijt RB, Crommelin DJ, Molecular Imaging and Optical Biopsy. [Available from: http://www.
Storm G. A new application for liposomesin cancer therapy. nemo‑strep.org].
Immunoliposomes bearing enzymes (immuno‑enzymosomes) for 38. VECTOR: Versatile Endoscopic Capsule for gastrointestinal TumOr
site‑specific activation of prodrugs. FEBS Lett 1993;336:485‑90. Recognition and therapy project. [Available from: http://www.
28. Kim BY, Rutka JT, Chan WC. Nanomedicine. N Engl J Med vector‑project.com.]
2010;363:2434‑43. 39. Podolsky DK. Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med 2002;347:417‑29.
29. Szentkuti L. Light microscopical observation in luminally administered 40. Nishimori H, Kondoh M, Isoda K, Tsunoda S, Tsutsumi Y, Yagi K.
dye, dextran, nanospheres and microsphere in pre‑epithelial mucus gel Silica nanoparticles as hepatotoxicants. Eur J Pharm Biopharm
layer of rat distal colon. J Control Release 1997;46:233‑42. 2009;72:496‑501.
30. Diamond DL, Proll SC, Jacobs JM, Chan EY, Camp DG 2nd, Smith TD,
et al. Hepatoproteomics: Applying proteomics technologies to the study
of liver function and disease. Hepatology 2006;44:299‑308. How to cite this article: Jha AK, Goenka MK, Nijhawan S, Rai RR,
Goenka U, Suchismita A. Nanotechnology in gastrointestinal endoscopy:
31. Laroui H, Wilson DS, Dalmasso G, Salaita K, Murthy N, Sitaraman SV, A primer. J Dig Endosc 2012;3:77-80.
et al. Nanomedicine in GI. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
2011;300: G371‑83.