Lubricants 10 00337
Lubricants 10 00337
Lubricants 10 00337
Article
Friction and Wear Behavior between Crane Wire Rope and
Pulley under Different Contact Loads
Xiangdong Chang 1,2 , Xiao Chen 3,4, *, Yaoyuan Dong 5 , Hao Lu 1,2 , Wei Tang 1,2 , Qing Zhang 1,2 and Kun Huang 1,2
1 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Mine Mechanical and Electrical Equipment, School of Mechanical and Electrical
Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2 Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Intelligent Mining Equipment, Xuzhou 221116, China
3 State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines,
Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
4 Coal Mine Safety Mining Equipment Innovation Center of Anhui Province, Anhui University of Science and
Technology, Huainan 232001, China
5 Angang Steel Company Limited, Anshan 114000, China
* Correspondence: 2020130@aust.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-150-6219-5713
Abstract: Surface wear caused by contact between crane wire rope and a pulley seriously affects
the mechanical properties of the wire rope. In this study, the tribological behavior of wire rope was
investigated using a homemade rope–pulley sliding friction test rig. Then, the influence of different
surface wear on the bending fatigue life of the rope samples was analyzed. The results show that
the friction coefficient (COF) decreases with the increasing sliding distance. It reaches a minimum of
approximately 0.52 when the contact load is 700 N. The surface temperature of the wire rope rises
rapidly and then gradually stabilizes. The maximum temperature rise fluctuates in the range of 50 ◦ C
to 60 ◦ C with increasing contact load. The wear scar of the wire rope is irregular, and the maximum
wear width increases from approximately 1.94 mm to 2.45 mm with the contact load. Additionally,
increased contact load leads to smoother wear surface of wire rope, and the wear mechanisms are
mainly abrasive wear and adhesive wear. Additionally, surface wear leads to a decrease in the
Citation: Chang, X.; Chen, X.; Dong, bending fatigue life of wire ropes, and degradation of anti-bending fatigue is more serious under a
Y.; Lu, H.; Tang, W.; Zhang, Q.; larger sliding contact load.
Huang, K. Friction and Wear
Behavior between Crane Wire Rope
Keywords: crane wire rope; pulley groove; sliding friction; surface wear; bending fatigue
and Pulley under Different Contact
Loads. Lubricants 2022, 10, 337.
https://doi.org/10.3390/
lubricants10120337
1. Introduction
Received: 30 October 2022
Wire rope is an important bearing and transmission component of crane machinery.
Accepted: 28 November 2022
The mechanical properties of the wire rope in service are directly related to the safe and
Published: 29 November 2022
reliable operation of the equipment system and the life safety of operators [1]. However,
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral during operation of the crane, the wire rope is affected by the system structure and working
with regard to jurisdictional claims in conditions, resulting in different wear of the wire rope [2,3]. This in turn leads to its
published maps and institutional affil- performance degradation and service life reduction. In order to achieve a wide range
iations. of heavy lifting, wire rope is used with pulleys, as shown in Figure 1. When the crane
completes hoisting, rotating, amplitude variation and driving functions, the wire rope is
subjected to irregular vibration and impact loads [4,5]. This leads to relative sliding and
frictional wear between the wire rope and the pulley groove [6,7]. Additionally, the wire
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
rope–pulley system is in a suspended state during service, and it will shake under loading
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
conditions. Thus, the wire rope will twist and swing on the pulley groove, resulting in
This article is an open access article
complex sliding contacts and severe surface wear. In this engineering application, the
distributed under the terms and
tribological behavior between the wire rope and the pulley not only harms the service
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
performance of wire ropes but also affects the operation stability of the hoisting system.
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
Therefore, exploring the sliding friction characteristics and wear mechanism between
4.0/).
Therefore, exploring the sliding friction characteristics and wear mechanism between the
wirewire
the roperope
andand
the the
pulley is ofisgreat
pulley significance
of great to itstostructural
significance design,
its structural safe safe
design, use and
use
maintenance.
and maintenance.
Figure1.1.Schematic
Figure Schematicdiagram
diagram of
of operation
operation system
system of
of crane
crane wire
wire rope.
rope.
In
Inrecent
recentyears,
years, many
many scholars
scholars have have carried
carried out research on damage and safe service
of
ofwire
wireroperopeunder
under actual
actual working
working conditions.
conditions. Wear, corrosion and fatigue are the main main
damage
damage formsforms of of wire
wire ropes
ropes [8].
[8]. To explore the fretting friction friction and
and wear
wear behavior
behavior be- be-
tween
tween internal
internal steel
steel wires
wires of of wire
wire rope
rope caused
caused by complex stress state, state, Wang
Wang et al. [9,10]
investigated
investigatedthe thedynamic
dynamic wearwear evolution
evolution and fretting fatigue characteristics between steel
wires
wiresunder
under different slidingslidingamplitudes.
amplitudes.Larger Larger relative
relative displacement
displacement reduces
reduces the the sur-
surface
face
wearwear of steel
of steel wires. wires. Cruzado
Cruzado et al.et[11–13]
al. [11–13]
deeplydeeply analyzed
analyzed the influence
the influence of contact
of contact load
load
and and crossing
crossing angleangle on fretting
on fretting friction
friction and and
wearwearbetweenbetween
steel steel
wireswires by simulation
by simulation and
and experiment. The results show that the wear volume
experiment. The results show that the wear volume caused by fretting between caused by fretting between steel
steel wires
wires
depends depends
mainlymainly on variation
on variation in normal in normal contact
contact load. load. Additionally,
Additionally, considering considering
the influ-
the
enceinfluence of the structural
of the structural characteristics
characteristics of wire rope,of wire rope, different
different spiralstates
spiral contact contact states
between
between
the steel thewiressteel
willwires
alsowill also
affect affect
their their fatigue
fretting frettingbehavior
fatigue behavior [14]. Furthermore,
[14]. Furthermore, because
because
the servicethe service
environmentenvironment
of wireof wireisrope
rope veryisharsh,
very harsh,
corrosivecorrosive environmental
environmental mediamedia
have
have a greater impact on the surface lubrication and friction state
a greater impact on the surface lubrication and friction state of the wire rope [15]. Wang of the wire rope [15].
Wang et al. [16] analyzed the tribo-fatigue behaviors of rope wires
et al. [16] analyzed the tribo-fatigue behaviors of rope wires under different environmen- under different environ-
mental
tal media media
(air, (air,
acid,acid, neutral
neutral and alkaline
and alkaline electrolyte
electrolyte solutions,
solutions, and deionized
and deionized water).water).
They
They found that the wear mechanisms include abrasive
found that the wear mechanisms include abrasive wear, adhesive wear, corrosion wear, adhesive wear, corrosion
wear
wear and fatigue
and fatigue wear.wear.Sun etSun
al. et
[17]al.carried
[17] carried
out anout an experimental
experimental studystudy on modification
on modification of wireof
wire
roperope
greasegrease
andand found
found thatthat
thethe anti-wear
anti-wear ability
ability of of
thethebase
basegrease
greasecan
canbe beenhanced
enhanced by by
addition
additionof ofmultilayer
multilayer graphene
graphene or or micron
micron graphite.
graphite. In In addition
addition to to fretting
fretting wear
wear between
between
internal wires, surface wear of wire ropes due to external contact
internal wires, surface wear of wire ropes due to external contact is also an important is also an important
cause
causeof ofdamage
damageand andperformance
performancedegradation
degradationofofwire wire ropes.
ropes. Considering
Considering thethe
influence
influence of
vibration shock and ambient temperature, Peng et al. [18,19] explored
of vibration shock and ambient temperature, Peng et al. [18,19] explored the sliding fric- the sliding friction
and
tionwear
and characteristics
wear characteristicsof wire of ropes
wire under different
ropes under impact
differentloads and low-temperature
impact loads and low-
environments. They found that effective lubrication reduces impact vibration and low
temperatures increase the COF between wire ropes. Oksanen et al. [20,21] analyzed the
Lubricants 2022, 10, 337 3 of 19
contact and wear characteristics between wire rope and a pulley, focusing on the effect
of relative sliding on the surface damage of the groove. The results show that material
removal proceeds through spalling of the deformation tongues by crack growth between
the graphite nodules and the surface. Moreover, the main harm of wear to wire rope is
degradation of its mechanical properties, which in turn reduces the service life of wire
ropes and threatens the safety and reliability of the equipment system. Chang et al. [22]
explored the influence of different wear scars on the breaking strength of wire rope. They
found that surface wear causes breaking elongation of wire rope to decrease and changes
the fracture morphology. Jikal et al. [23] studied the influence of different corrosions on the
fatigue limit of wire ropes through comparative tests and proposed a method for predicting
the life of wire ropes in corrosive environments. They found that corrosion could lead
to a significant decrease in fatigue strength and accelerate fatigue damage of corroded
steel strands. Fatigue life decreases linearly with corrosion level. Chen et al. [24] estab-
lished a corrosion damage model of multi-layer strand wire rope and analyzed the effect
of pitting corrosion on its mechanical properties. Wahid et al. [25] studied the effect of
number of broken wires on fracture failure of wire ropes and proposed a damage prediction
method. By analyzing the mechanical and chemical properties of wire rope, they found
that the behavior of wire rope is semi-brittle. Based on a bending fatigue test of wire ropes,
Battini et al. [26] proposed a thermal method for estimating fatigue life of metallic ropes.
The proposed model showed a very good correlation between early-stage data and first
wire failure conditions. Then, the research results realized evaluation of damage and life of
wire ropes by monitoring heat changes.
To improve the tribological behavior of wire rope under different service conditions,
Zhang et al. [27,28] studied the tribological behavior of wire rope under the condition of
modified lubricating oil and analyzed the effect of different additives on reducing the sur-
face wear. They found that lanthanum-stearate-modified lubricating oil can better reduce
the wear of wire rope under different sliding speeds and contact loads. Chang et al. [29]
studied the tribological properties of lubricated wire ropes in different corrosive envi-
ronments. The results show that the corrosion solutions degenerate the anti-friction and
anti-wear properties of the lubricating grease and oil. McColl et al. [30] studied the friction
and wear properties of steel wire under different lubrication conditions and found that
grease lubrication can form a better protective layer on the contact surface and reduce the
COF. Périer et al. [31] analyzed the fretting friction and wear behaviors of wires in NaCl
solution and aqueous solution. The results show that the influence of NaCl solution on
fretting fatigue life is not obvious. Molnár et al. [32] studied the performance degradation
of wire rope and internal wire in salt solution. It is helpful to predict the service life of wire
ropes. Wu et al. [33] studied the influence of sulfide concentration, stress level and pH
value on stress corrosion cracking of steel wire. They found that galvanized coating was
effective in reducing the corrosion.
Through the above analysis, it can be found that the existing research mainly focuses
on fretting fatigue of steel wires and surface wear between wire ropes. However, the
variation characteristics of friction behavior and wear mechanisms mainly depend on
tribological (friction) pairs [34,35]. There are few studies on the rope–pulley friction and
wear system. This surface wear is also common under service conditions of crane wire
ropes. Additionally, it is difficult to accurately judge the service state and safety reliability
of wire rope without fully mastering the damage forms and characteristic mechanisms.
Therefore, it is necessary to study the tribological behavior of crane wire rope in the process
of bending over the pulley and reveal the damage to its service performance.
In this paper, sliding friction and wear tests between wire rope and a pulley under
different contact loads were carried out. Variations in the COF, friction temperature rise
and characteristic parameters (wear width and wear loss) of surface wear under different
test conditions were measured and analyzed. Additionally, the characteristics and wear
mechanisms of the wear surface were revealed. Finally, the fracture failure behaviors of
different worn wire ropes under bending fatigue load were analyzed. The degradation
Lubricants 2022, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 20
Wire
Zinc coating
Table
Table 1. Structure parameters of the wire rope.
rope.
Parameter
Parameter Value Value
Length
Lengthofofthe
the rope sample(mm)
rope sample (mm) 600 600
Diameter of the rope
Diameter of the rope (mm)(mm) 9.3 9.3
Radiusof
Radius ofthe
the steel
steel wires
wires(mm)
(mm) 0.3 0.3
Strandlay
Strand laylength
length (mm)
(mm) 70 70
Strand lay angle (◦ ) 15.5
Strand lay angle (°)
Strand lay direction Right
15.5
Strand laytensile
Nominal direction
strength (Mpa) 1570 Right
Nominal
Breakingtensile
force (N)strength (Mpa) 52,500 1570
Breaking force (N) 52,500
Lubricants 2022, 10, 337 5 of 19
characteristics and fracture morphology of broken wires in the wear region were observed
and discussed.
F
A A
Torque sensor
(a) (b)
Bending
Wire rope
Rocker
(c) A-A
Bending rope
Arc fixture
650 N
Friction coefficient
0.9 0.64 0.58 0.59
700 N 0.56
0.8 750 N 0.54
800 N 0.52
0.56
0.7
0.6 0.48
0.5
0.40
0.4
(a) (b)
0.3 0.32
0 50 100 150 200 250 600 650 700 750 800
Sliding distance (m) Contact load (N)
Figure 5. COF curves between wire rope and pulley under different sliding conditions: (a) process
variation
variation curves
curves with sliding distance,
with sliding distance, (b)
(b) average
average COF
COF in
in the
the relatively
relatively stable
stable stage.
stage.
Figure6.6. Infrared
Figure Infrared thermal
thermal images
images of
of the friction pairs:
the friction pairs: (a)
(a) contact
contact load
loadof
of600
600N,
N,(b)
(b)contact
contactload
loadof
of 800
800 N.N.
Figure
Figure77shows
showsthetheinfrared
infraredthermal
thermalimage
imageofofthe
thefriction
frictionpairs
pairsunder
underdifferent
differentsliding
sliding
distances. It clearly shows the variation characteristics of the surface temperature
distances. It clearly shows the variation characteristics of the surface temperature during the
during
friction test. The
the friction test.color
The of the of
color wire
therope changes
wire greatly with
rope changes the increasing
greatly sliding distance,
with the increasing sliding
especially in the early stage of the test. When the sliding distance increases
distance, especially in the early stage of the test. When the sliding distance increases from 5 mfromto
50 m, the surface color of the wire rope gradually changes from dull to
5 m to 50 m, the surface color of the wire rope gradually changes from dull to bright, asbright, as shown
in Figure 7a–d. This means that the surface temperature of the wire rope rises rapidly at
shown in Figure 7a–d. This means that the surface temperature of the wire rope rises rap-
this stage. Additionally, the frictional heat generated by the test is gradually diffused from
idly at this stage. Additionally, the frictional heat generated by the test is gradually dif-
the contact surface, and the temperature of the pulley groove rises significantly faster (see
fused from the contact surface, and the temperature of the pulley groove rises significantly
Figure 7c). This is because the structure of the groove is regular and the surface is complete
faster (see Figure 7c). This is because the structure of the groove is regular and the surface
and continuous. The friction heat transfers faster on the pulley. Furthermore, when the
is complete and continuous. The friction heat transfers faster on the pulley. Furthermore,
sliding distance exceeds 100 m, the surface color of the wire rope is very bright and basically
when the sliding distance exceeds 100 m, the surface color of the wire rope is very bright and
unchanged. However, the temperature of the contact area is still increasing with the sliding
basically as
distance, unchanged. However,
shown in Figure theTherefore,
7e–h. temperaturethe of the contact
friction area is stillby
heat generated increasing with the
the rope–pulley
sliding distance, as shown in Figure 7e–h. Therefore, the friction heat generated
friction transfers slowly on the surface of the wire rope, and the temperature rise is mainly by the rope–
Lubricants 2022, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW
pulley friction transfers slowly on the surface of the wire rope, and the temperature 10rise
of 20
concentrated in the sliding contact area. The temperature variation in the wire rope is more
is mainly
easily concentrated
observed in the sliding
by the infrared thermalcontact
imagerarea.
at theThe temperature
beginning of thevariation
test. in the wire
rope is more easily observed by the infrared thermal imager at the beginning of the test.
Figure 7. Infrared thermal images of wire rope under different sliding distances.
Figure 7. Infrared thermal images of wire rope under different sliding distances.
The variation in the maximum temperature rise of the wire rope with the sliding
The variation in the maximum temperature rise of the wire rope with the sliding distance
distance and the contact load collected by the infrared thermal imager is shown in Figure 8.
and the contact
The difference load collected
among by the infrared
the temperature thermal
rise curves underimager is shown
different contactinloads
Figure 8. Theas
is small, dif-
shown in Figure 8a. The changing trend of the curves is basically the same. The curves in-as
ference among the temperature rise curves under different contact loads is small,
shownrapidly
crease in Figure 8a.beginning
at the The changing trend
of the test butoffluctuate
the curves is basically
greatly. the same.
This is because the The curves
structure
increase rapidly at the beginning of the test but fluctuate greatly. This is because
of the rope surface changes greatly in the initial wear stage. The friction pair changes from the struc-
ture of the rope surface changes greatly in the initial wear stage. The friction pair changes
from discontinuous line contact state to more stable surface contact state. Therefore, the
surface temperature of the wire rope changes greatly in a short sliding distance. Addition-
ally, the contact position of the wire rope on the rope groove changes greatly at this stage,
and the surface temperature distribution of the wire rope is not uniform (see Figure 7).
Lubricants 2022, 10, 337 10 of 19
discontinuous line contact state to more stable surface contact state. Therefore, the surface
temperature of the wire rope changes greatly in a short sliding distance. Additionally, the
contact position of the wire rope on the rope groove changes greatly at this stage, and the
surface temperature distribution of the wire rope is not uniform (see Figure 7). The location
of highest surface temperature monitored by infrared thermography is constantly chang-
ing. Thus, the maximum temperature rise curves of the rope surface fluctuates greatly
within a sliding distance of approximately 50 m. Furthermore, as the sliding distance
continues to increase (from 50 m to 240 m), the temperature curves gradually stabilize
after a slow growth stage. This indicates that the sliding wear surface of the wire rope
gradually becomes stable. Although friction heat continues to be generated during the test,
the surface temperature rise of the wire rope will not always increase. When the sliding
distance exceeds 150 m, the heat generated by the rope–pulley sliding friction is balanced
with the heat dissipation conditions of the surrounding environment. Thus, the maximum
temperature rise of the wire rope is almost constant at the later stage of the friction test.
Moreover, when the contact loads are 750 N and 800 N, the temperature rise curves rise
significantly faster than other curves in the slow growth stage (from approximately 50 m to
150 m). This means that the increase in contact load will accelerate the increase in surface
temperature of the wire rope during the friction test. This is because the larger contact
load leads to an increase in the surface stress of the wire rope, and the evolution speed of
the wear will be accelerated during the sliding process. Especially in the transition phase,
the wear process will be more severe. Additionally, large contact stress will cause plastic
Lubricants 2022, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 20
deformation of the rope surface and the wear surface will be relatively smooth. Thus, more
energy is converted into frictional heat during sliding friction.
80 70
70 (a) (b) 57
Temperature
63
Temperature (℃)
55
Temperature (℃)
60 52.7 53.5
51.7
56
50
40 49
30 600 N
650 N 42
20 700N
750 N 35
10 800 N
0 28
0 50 100 150 200 250 600 650 700 750 800
Sliding distance (m) Contact load (N)
Figure Variationcurves
Figure8.8.Variation curvesofof friction
friction temperature
temperature rise
rise under
under different
different contact
contact loads:
loads: (a) process
(a) process var-
iation curves
variation withwith
curves sliding distance,
sliding (b) (b)
distance, average temperature
average at the
temperature end
at the of of
end thethe
measurement.
measurement.
ToToquantitatively
quantitativelycompare
comparethe theinfluence
influence of of different
different contact
contact loads
loads on friction
on the the friction
tem-
temperature rise in the relatively stable stage, the average temperature
perature rise in the relatively stable stage, the average temperature rise of the rope surfacerise of the rope
surface
was was calculated
calculated based onbased on the
the data data collected
collected from the from
lastthe
50 m lastsliding
50 m sliding
distance,distance,
as shownas
shown in Figure 8b. The influence of contact load on the temperature rise
in Figure 8b. The influence of contact load on the temperature rise is not obvious, and the is not obvious,
and thelaw
change change law is opposite
is opposite to that ofto that
the of the
COF. COF.
With theWith theload
contact contact load increasing
increasing from 600from
N◦ to
600 N to 800 N, the friction
800 N, the friction temperature temperature rise fluctuates in the range of approximately
rise fluctuates in the range of approximately 51 °C to ap- 51 C
to approximately 57 ◦ C. This indicates that the surface wear state of the wire ropes is
proximately 57 °C. This indicates that the surface wear state of the wire ropes is similar in
similar in the relatively stable stage. Because the contact load has a greater influence on the
the relatively stable stage. Because the contact load has a greater influence on the progress
progress and degree of surface wear, the influence on the surface characteristics and friction
and degree of surface wear, the influence on the surface characteristics and friction contact
contact state is relatively small. Furthermore, when the contact load is 700 N, the friction
state is relatively small. Furthermore, when the contact load is 700 N, the friction temper-
temperature rise is maximized. This is because the frictional heat generated by the wire
ature rise is maximized. This is because the frictional heat generated by the wire rope
rope during sliding is closely related to the change in friction and wear morphology [37].
during slidingthe
Additionally, is closely related toaffects
test temperature the change in friction
the hardness andand wear morphology
tribological properties [37]. Ad-
of metal
ditionally, the test
materials [38]. Undertemperature affects
the condition the hardness
of small COF, the and tribological
surface of the wireproperties of metal
rope is relatively
materials [38]. Under the condition of small COF, the surface of the wire rope is relatively
smooth and the wear rate slows down. At this time, more energy is converted into friction
heat during the sliding friction process. Therefore, the friction temperature rise of the wire
rope is relatively large. Therefore, by monitoring the temperature change in the wire rope,
the wear state can be well judged, but it is difficult to distinguish the change in contact
Lubricants 2022, 10, 337 11 of 19
smooth and the wear rate slows down. At this time, more energy is converted into friction
heat during the sliding friction process. Therefore, the friction temperature rise of the wire
rope is relatively large. Therefore, by monitoring the temperature change in the wire rope,
the wear state can be well judged, but it is difficult to distinguish the change in contact load
between the rope and the pulley.
Figure9.9.Distribution
Figure Distribution of
of wear
wear scars
scars on
on rope
rope strand
strand under
under different
different contact loads: (a,b)
contact loads: (a,b) wear
wear scars,
scars,
(c)
(c)profile
profileofofwear
wearscar
scarunder
underdifferent
differentcontact
contactloads.
loads.
Figure
Figure10 10shows
shows thethe maximum
maximum wear wear width
width of
of the
the wear
wear scar
scar on
on the
the rope
rope surface and
surface and
the wear loss of the friction pairs under different contact loads. Wear width increases
the wear loss of the friction pairs under different contact loads. Wear width increases sig- signif-
icantly withwith
nificantly increasing contact
increasing load,load,
contact from from
approximately 1.94 mm
approximately 1.94tomm
2.45tomm.
2.45Additionally,
mm. Addi-
when thewhen
tionally, contacttheload is small
contact load is(less
smallthan 700
(less N),700
than theN),
wear
the width increases
wear width slowly.
increases The
slowly.
variation range in the wear width is approximately 0.14 mm. However,
The variation range in the wear width is approximately 0.14 mm. However, when the when the contact
load increases
contact from 700from
load increases N to700
800NN, tothe
800wear
N, thewidth
wearincreases rapidlyrapidly
width increases from approximately
from approx-
2.08 mm to 2.45 mm. This indicates that the wear width increases nonlinearly with in-
imately 2.08 mm to 2.45 mm. This indicates that the wear width increases nonlinearly with
creasing contact load. This is not only because the surface wear is more severe but also
increasing contact load. This is not only because the surface wear is more severe but also
the result of structural deformation of the wire rope under transverse pressure. The wear
the result of structural deformation of the wire rope under transverse pressure. The wear
loss between the wire rope and the pulley under different contact loads is presented in
loss between the wire rope and the pulley under different contact loads is presented in
Figure 9b. It increases linearly with the contact load (from approximately 5.614 g to 6.581 g).
Figure 9b. It increases linearly with the contact load (from approximately 5.614 g to 6.581
There are obvious differences in the change trend between the wear width and the wear
g). There are obvious differences in the change trend between the wear width and the
loss. This is because the pulley groove during the sliding friction test also resulted in severe
wear loss. This is because the pulley groove during the sliding friction test also resulted
wear and produced a large amount of wear debris. Because the wear of the rope groove is
in severe wear and produced a large amount of wear debris. Because the wear of the rope
relatively uniform during sliding wear, the amount of wear generated by the friction pairs
groove is relatively uniform during sliding wear, the amount of wear generated by the
increases steadily as the contact load increases. Therefore, by quantitatively analyzing the
friction pairs increases steadily as the contact load increases. Therefore, by quantitatively
wear characteristics, it can be found that the actual damage of the contact load to the wear
analyzing the wear characteristics, it can be found that the actual damage of the contact
degree of the wire rope is approximately linear.
load to the wear degree of the wire rope is approximately linear.
3.0 8.0
Wear width Wear loss
2.45 7.2 6.581
6.137 6.242
)
2.5 5.916
wear loss. This is because the pulley groove during the sliding friction test also resulted
in severe wear and produced a large amount of wear debris. Because the wear of the rope
groove is relatively uniform during sliding wear, the amount of wear generated by the
friction pairs increases steadily as the contact load increases. Therefore, by quantitatively
Lubricants 2022, 10, 337 analyzing the wear characteristics, it can be found that the actual damage of the contact
12 of 19
load to the wear degree of the wire rope is approximately linear.
3.0 8.0
Wear width Wear loss
2.45 7.2 6.581
6.137 6.242
4.0
1.5
3.2
1.0 2.4
600 650 700 750 800 600 650 700 750 800
Contact load (N) Contact load (N)
(a) (b)
Figure
Figure 10.
10. Wear
Wear characteristic
characteristic parameters
parameters of
of wire
wire rope
rope under
under different
different contact
contact loads:
loads: (a)
(a) maximum
maximum
wear
wear width,
width, (b)
(b) wear
wear loss.
loss.
Figure11.
Figure 11.Surface
Surface wear
wear characteristics
characteristics of wireof wire
rope rope
under undercontact
different different contact
loads: (a) 600loads: (a) 600
N, (b) 650 N, N, (b)
N,700
(c) (c) N,
700(d)N,750
(d)N,750 N, (e)
(e) 800 N. 800 N.
The morphological characteristics of the wear debris were obtained by the optical
microscope and SEM, as shown in Figure 12. Figure 12a–c shows the optical micrographs
of the wear debris in different sizes, and Figure 12d–f shows the SEM images of the wear
debris in different sizes. They are taken from different test samples. It is observed that the
characteristics of the wear debris produced during the friction test are constantly changing.
The particle size of the wear debris is relatively large at the initial stage of the test, as
shown in Figure 12a,d. The wear debris is mostly long strip, and there is obvious plastic
deformation and furrows on the surface. This is because the contact area between the
wire rope and the rope groove is small and the contact stress is large in the early stage
of the friction test. The line contact state is easy to produce ploughing on the surface of
the rope groove, resulting in removal of large particle materials. Furthermore, with the
sliding distance increasing, the contact area between the friction pairs expands rapidly
and the size of the wear debris becomes smaller, showing irregular flake particles (see
Figure 12b,e). This indicates that the ploughing action of the wire rope on the surface of the
groove is weakened, and the removal of the material is mainly caused by adhesion and
spalling between the contact surfaces. Moreover, when the friction experiment enters a
relatively stable stage, the wear rate of the friction pair slows down and the size of the wear
debris becomes smaller (see Figure 12c,f). This is because the surface of the friction pairs
becomes more and more smooth, and the material does not easily fall off during the sliding
friction process. Additionally, part of the wear debris is crushed between the sliding contact
surfaces and the wear particles become smaller and thinner. Therefore, in the process of
sliding wear between the wire rope and pulley, the size of wear debris becomes smaller
and smaller. In the relatively stable stage, the wear debris is the smallest and plays a role of
lubrication in the sliding process, which can reduce the degree of the surface wear.
Figure 13 shows the SEM image of the wear surface on the damaged steel wires under
different contact loads. This clearly shows the change in wear characteristics on rope
surface with increasing contact load. The wear characteristic of the damaged wire is mainly
furrows when the contact load is 600 N (see Figure 13a). The surface is uneven, and there
are characteristics of plastic deformation caused by large contact stress. This means that
the surface damage of the wire rope is obviously affected by its structure, and removal
of the material is mainly caused by the mechanical damage. Because the wire rope is a
spiral structure, the sliding contact surface is composed of discontinuous steel wires and
rope strands. This causes the friction pair contact surface to be very uneven. Thus, the
Lubricants 2022, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 14 of 20
The morphological characteristics of the wear debris were obtained by the optical
Lubricants 2022, 10, 337 14 of 19
microscope and SEM, as shown in Figure 12. Figure 12a–c shows the optical micrographs
of the wear debris in different sizes, and Figure 12d–f shows the SEM images of the wear
debris in different sizes. They are taken from different test samples. It is observed that the
sliding resistance is larger and the surface scratches and ploughing effect is more obvious.
characteristics of the wear debris produced during the friction test are constantly chang-
Additionally, the wear particles between the contact surface will exacerbate the surface
ing. The particle size of the wear debris is relatively large at the initial stage of the test, as
ploughing. Furthermore, as the contact load changes to 650 N (see Figure 13b), although
shownfurrows
many in Figure are12a,d. The wear
distributed alongdebris is mostly
the sliding long strip,
direction on theandwear there is obvious
surface, the size plastic
of the furrows is small and the surface is more regular. This indicates that an increase wire
deformation and furrows on the surface. This is because the contact area between the
rope
in the and
contactthe load
ropewillgroove
reduceis small and
the size of the
the contact
furrows stress
and makeis large in the early
the spalling and stage
pittingof the
friction test. The line contact state is easy to produce ploughing
characteristics more pronounced. Moreover, when the contact load exceeds 700 N, on the surface of the
the rope
groove,
wear resulting
surface of the in removal
steel of largevery
wire becomes particle
smooth materials. Furthermore,
(see Figure with the
13c–e). Especially sliding
when the dis-
tance increasing,
contact load is 800 N, theit contact area
is difficult between
to see the friction
the obvious damagepairs expands rapidly
characteristics andarea.
in the wear the size
This is because
of the the friction
wear debris becomestemperature
smaller,rise of the wire
showing rope isflake
irregular larger under the
particles condition
(see Figure of 12b,e).
large contact load. The surface material will soften during the sliding
This indicates that the ploughing action of the wire rope on the surface of the groove is wear process, which
isweakened,
more likelyand to bethesheared
removal and ofplastically deformed.
the material Therefore,
is mainly caused thebyfurrow characteristics
adhesion and spalling
of the wear surface are weakened, and the adhesion characteristics,
between the contact surfaces. Moreover, when the friction experiment enters such as pitting and
a relatively
spalling, are enhanced.
stable stage, the wear rate Therefore, with the
of the friction increases
pair slows downin contact load,
and the theoffurrows
size the wear anddebris
spalling pits on the wear surface of the wire rope are significantly reduced. The abrasive
becomes smaller (see Figure 12c,f). This is because the surface of the friction pairs becomes
wear is reduced during this process. Additionally, as the surface becomes smoother, the
more and more smooth, and the material does not easily fall off during the sliding friction
wear rate slows down, and adhesion is enhanced and the size of the wear debris becomes
process. Additionally, part of the wear debris is crushed between the sliding contact sur-
smaller. This also causes the abrasive wear characteristics to weaken. The sliding wear
faces and the
mechanisms wear particles
between the wire become
rope andsmaller
the pulleyandare thinner.
mainlyTherefore,
abrasive wear in the
andprocess
adhesive of slid-
ing wear
wear. between the
Furthermore, thewire rope andcharacteristics
morphology pulley, the size of of wear debris
abrasive wear on becomes
the wiresmaller
rope and
smaller.
surface areInmore
the relatively
obvious under stable stage,contact
smaller the wearload.debris is the
The effect of smallest
contact load andonplays a role of
the wear
lubrication in the sliding process, which can reduce the degree
mechanism is mainly achieved by plastic deformation and friction temperature rise. of the surface wear.
Figure 12.Optical
Figure12. Opticalmicroscopy and
microscopy SEM
and of of
SEM wear debris
wear between
debris wirewire
between roperope
and and
pulley: (a–c)(a–c)
pulley: macro-
macro-
graph under optical microscope, (d–f) microtopography under SEM.
graph under optical microscope, (d–f) microtopography under SEM.
Figure 13 shows the SEM image of the wear surface on the damaged steel wires under
different contact loads. This clearly shows the change in wear characteristics on rope
Lubricants2022,
Lubricants 10, x
2022, 10, 337
FOR PEER REVIEW 15 of 19
16 of 20
Figure13.
Figure 13.SEM
SEMimage
imageofof worn
worn steel
steel wires
wires under
under different
different contact
contact loads:loads:
(a) 600(a)
N,600 N, (b)
(b) 650 650700
N, (c) N,N,
(c) 700
N, 750
(d) (d) N,
750(e)
N,800
(e)N.
800 N.
3.4.
3.4.Bending
BendingFatigue
FatigueFailure of of
Failure Worn
Worn Wire Rope
Wire Rope
The corresponding relationship between number of broken wires and bending cycles
The corresponding relationship between number of broken wires and bending cycles
is obtained by carrying out bending fatigue tests on the wire rope with different surface
is obtained by carrying out bending fatigue tests on the wire rope with different surface
wear, as shown in Figure 14. With the accumulation of bending fatigue time, the number of
wear, as shown in Figure 14. With the accumulation of bending fatigue time, the number
broken wires increases continuously. When the wire rope is not subjected to surface wear,
of broken
the wires
first broken increases
wire continuously.
occurs after When
approximately thebending
5200 wire rope is not
fatigue subjected
cycles, as shownto surface
in
wear, 14a.
Figure the first
Then,broken wire occurs
as the amount after approximately
of bending 5200 bending
increases, the broken fatigue
wire increases cycles, as
linearly.
shown in when
However, Figurethe14a. Then, of
number as broken
the amount
wiresof bending
exceeds increases,
four, its growth therate
broken
begins wire increases
to slow
linearly.
down. However, when
Furthermore, the number
when the numberof ofbroken
brokenwires
wiresexceeds
exceeds six,four, its growth
its growth rate rate
beginsbegins
toincrease
to slow down. Furthermore,
again. when in
With the increase thebending
numberfatigue
of broken
time,wires exceeds
the broken six,curves
wire its growth
rise rate
begins to increase
approximately again. With
in a straight line. the
Thisincrease
indicatesinthat
bending fatiguefatigue
the bending time, the broken
damage wire
to the curves
wire
rope is a cumulative deterioration process, and, with an increase in bending
rise approximately in a straight line. This indicates that the bending fatigue damage to the fatigue time,
the
wirefracture
rope isspeed of the wires
a cumulative is accelerated.process,
deterioration Additionally, the variation
and, with an increase trendinofbending
the brokenfatigue
wire
time,curves of the rope
the fracture speed samples is basically
of the wires the same,Additionally,
is accelerated. but the anti-fatigue performance
the variation trendisof the
obviously
broken wire degraded.
curves of With
the an increase
rope samplesin contact load,the
is basically thesame,
bending butfatigue times of the
the anti-fatigue perfor-
wire rope under the same broken wire condition decrease.
mance is obviously degraded. With an increase in contact load, the bendingThe first broken wire beginstimes
fatigue
to appear on these rope samples after 2000–3500 bending fatigue cycles. This means that
of the wire rope under the same broken wire condition decrease. The first broken wire
surface wear has a significant effect on the bending fatigue strength of wire ropes and
begins to appear on these rope samples after 2000–3500 bending fatigue cycles. This means
accelerates the fracture speed of internal steel wires [42]. Furthermore, by comparing the
that surface wear has a significant effect on the bending fatigue strength of wire ropes and
change process of the curves, it can be seen that, when the number of broken wires exceeds
accelerates the fracture speed of internal steel wires [42]. Furthermore, by comparing the
change process of the curves, it can be seen that, when the number of broken wires exceeds
approximately seven, the broken wires change more regularly with increasing bending
Lubricants 2022, 10, 337 16 of 19
Lubricants 2022, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 20
approximately seven, the broken wires change more regularly with increasing bending
fatigue
fatigue times.
times. This
This indicates
indicates that
that the
the internal
internal wire
wire breaking
breaking of of the
the wire
wire rope
rope hashas aa certain
certain
randomness
randomness in the early stage of the bending fatigue test, and the breaking sequence
in the early stage of the bending fatigue test, and the breaking sequence of of
different
different positions
positions isis uncertain.
uncertain. However,
However, whenwhen thethe broken
broken wirewirereaches
reachesaacertain
certainnumber,
number,
the
the bending
bending fatigue
fatigue dangerous
dangerous area area of
of the
the wire
wire rope
rope is is basically
basically determined,
determined, and and the
the stress
stress
becomes
becomes concentrated
concentrated nearnear the
the broken
broken wire
wireofofthe
thewire
wirerope.
rope.This
Thisisismore
morelikely
likelytotocause
causea
afracture
fractureofof
thethe surrounding
surrounding steel
steel wires.
wires. Therefore,
Therefore, thetherope rope samples
samples in bending
in the the bending fa-
fatigue
tigue process appear as continuous concentrated broken wires in the
process appear as continuous concentrated broken wires in the late bending fatigue test. late bending fatigue
test. Moreover,
Moreover, Figure Figure 14b shows
14b shows the maximum
the maximum bendingbending
fatigue fatigue
times times
of the of thesample
rope rope sample
under
under different
different contactcontact loads.
loads. The The bending
bending fatigue fatigue times decrease
times decrease from approximately
from approximately 7700 to
7700
4850 to 4850
with with increasing
increasing contactcontact
load. Theload. The bending
bending fatiguefatigue life wire
life of the of therope
wireisrope is ob-
obviously
viously
degraded,degraded,
and it isand it is proved
proved that thethatharmtheof
harm of sliding
sliding wear to wear
theto the rope
wire wire increases
rope increases
with
with increasing
increasing contact contact load. Therefore,
load. Therefore, controlling
controlling the contact the load
contact load the
between between
crane the
wirecrane
rope
wire rope and the pulley can effectively extend its
and the pulley can effectively extend its bending fatigue life. bending fatigue life.
14 10,000
10000
Without wear
(a)
10
8000 7250
6780
(b)
7000
8 5910
6000
6 4850
600 N 5000
4 650 N
4000
700 N
2 750 N 3000
800 N
0 2000
2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10,000 11,000
10000 11000 600 650 700 750 800
Bending fatigue times Contact load (N)
Bending fatigue
14. Bending
Figure 14. fatigue degradation
degradation characteristics
characteristics of different
different rope samples: (a) variation
variation curves
curves
of broken wire number with bending fatigue times, (b) maximum bending fatigue times
broken wire number with bending fatigue times, (b) maximum bending fatigue times under under dif-
ferent contact loads.
different contact loads.
Figure 15 shows
shows the the broken
broken wirewire distribution
distribution (Figure
(Figure 15a–c)
15a–c) and
and fracture
fracture morphology
morphology
(Figure 15c–e) of rope samples caused by bending fatigue test.
15c–e) of rope samples caused by bending fatigue test. The observations The observations in in
Figure
Figure 15
areare
15 taken from
taken different
from roperope
different samples and wire
samples and samples. The broken
wire samples. wires produced
The broken during
wires produced
the bending
during fatiguefatigue
the bending processprocess
are mainly concentrated
are mainly in theinwear
concentrated region.
the wear ThisThis
region. indicates
indi-
that surface
cates wear reduces
that surface wear reducesthe bending fatiguefatigue
the bending strength of wireofrope
strength wire[42].
ropeAdditionally,
[42]. Addition- the
fracture
ally, of the steel
the fracture wire
of the appears
steel in the middle
wire appears of the wear
in the middle of thescar and
wear is and
scar distributed along
is distributed
the spiral
along direction
the spiral on theon
direction ropethestrand (see Figure
rope strand 15a–c).15a–c).
(see Figure This isThis
because wire tension
is because wire ten- is
along the steel wire axial direction in the process of bending and
sion is along the steel wire axial direction in the process of bending and the fracture is the fracture is along the
steel wire
along radialwire
the steel direction
radial[43]. Therefore,
direction the brokenthe
[43]. Therefore, steel wire issteel
broken continuously distributed
wire is continuously
along the strand
distributed alongaxis. Additionally,
the strand the fracturethe
axis. Additionally, of fracture
the steelof wire
theissteel
verywire
neat,
is indicating
very neat,
that the fracture
indicating that theis afracture
transient is process,
a transient andprocess,
no plasticanddeformation caused by a large
no plastic deformation caused load
by isa
produced before fracture. Figure 15d shows the fracture characteristics
large load is produced before fracture. Figure 15d shows the fracture characteristics of the of the unworn steel
wire. Thesteel
unworn fracture
wire.profile of the steel
The fracture profilewireofisthevery complete
steel wire is andverythere are many
complete and cracks
there are on
the fracture surface. This indicates that the internal damage of
many cracks on the fracture surface. This indicates that the internal damage of steel wiresteel wire under bending
fatiguebending
under load is fatigue
a process loadofiscontinuous
a process ofcumulative
continuouschange.
cumulative Thechange.
crack propagates
The crack prop-with
the increase in bending fatigue times until fracture. Furthermore,
agates with the increase in bending fatigue times until fracture. Furthermore, when the when the steel wire is
subjected
steel wire to surface wear,
is subjected the fracture
to surface wear,characteristics do not change
the fracture characteristics dosignificantly, but the
not change signifi-
number of cracks on the surface increase and the size becomes
cantly, but the number of cracks on the surface increase and the size becomes larger. This larger. This means that
surface wear accelerates growth in fatigue cracks, causing
means that surface wear accelerates growth in fatigue cracks, causing the wire rope tothe wire rope to break faster.
Moreover, the fracture morphology of the wire rope is relatively regular and the surface is
break faster. Moreover, the fracture morphology of the wire rope is relatively regular and
bright crystalline. Therefore, the fracture mechanism of wire rope under bending fatigue
the surface is bright crystalline. Therefore, the fracture mechanism of wire rope under
load is mainly brittle fracture. Surface wear causes the broken wire to concentrate and
bending fatigue load is mainly brittle fracture. Surface wear causes the broken wire to
speed up, greatly affecting the service life of the wire rope.
concentrate and speed up, greatly affecting the service life of the wire rope.
Lubricants
Lubricants2022,
2022,10,
10, x337
FOR PEER REVIEW 17 of 18
19 of 20
Figure15.
Figure 15.Fracture
Fracturefailure
failurebehavior
behaviorofof worn
worn wire
wire rope
rope caused
caused by bending
by bending fatigue:
fatigue: (a–c)(a–c) distribution
distribution
characteristicsofofbroken
characteristics brokenwires,
wires, (d–f)
(d–f) fracture
fracture characteristics.
characteristics.
4.
4. Conclusions
Conclusions
In this study, the friction characteristics and wear mechanisms between crane wire
In this study, the friction characteristics and wear mechanisms between crane wire
rope and a pulley groove were investigated. Then, the bending fatigue life and fracture
rope and a pulley groove were investigated. Then, the bending fatigue life and fracture
failure behavior of the damaged rope samples were analyzed. The major conclusions are
failure
as behavior of the damaged rope samples were analyzed. The major conclusions are
follows:
as follows:
(1) The COF decreases with the increasing sliding distance, and the variation speed is
(1) The COFthen
fast and decreases
slow. The with theofincreasing
effect contact load sliding
on thedistance,
COF in the andstable
the variation speed is
stage is small.
fast and
With then slow.
the contact loadThe effect of
increasing contact
from 600 Nload onN,
to 800 thetheCOF
COFinfluctuates
the stableinstage is small.
the range
With the contact load
of approximately increasing
0.52 to 0.59. from 600 N to 800 N, the COF fluctuates in the range
(2) ofTheapproximately
surface temperature0.52 to rise
0.59.of the wire rope increases rapidly and then becomes
stablesurface
(2) The gradually during therise
temperature friction
of the test. The
wire surface
rope temperature
increases rapidlyofand the then
wire rope
becomes
rises relatively
stable gradually fastduring
under the
the condition of large
friction test. Theload contact.
surface The increase
temperature in contact
of the wire rope
load causes
rises the friction
relatively fast undertemperature rise to
the condition ofincrease
large loadfirstcontact.
and then Thedecrease,
increase andin the
contact
temperature reaches the maximum at the load of 700 N, which is approximately ◦ C.
57and
load causes the friction temperature rise to increase first and then decrease, the
(3) temperature
Rope–pulley sliding
reachescontact causes the
the maximum wear
at the of the
load wire
of 700 N,rope
whichto be discontinuously57 °C.
is approximately
distributed on multiple strands with irregular contour. Under the same sliding
(3) Rope–pulley sliding contact causes the wear of the wire rope to be discontinuously
condition, the larger contact load leads to an increase in the wear degree of the wire
distributed on multiple strands with irregular contour. Under the same sliding con-
rope. The wear width increases from approximately 1.94 mm to 2.45 mm with the
dition, the larger contact load leads to an increase in the wear degree of the wire rope.
increasing contact load.
(4) The
In thewear width
process increases
of sliding wear from approximately
between the wire rope 1.94
andmm theto 2.45 groove,
pulley mm with thethe
sizeincreas-
of
ing contact load.
wear debris becomes smaller and smaller. The wear surface of the wire rope becomes
(4) In the process
smoother and theof sliding
damage wear between thesuch
characteristics, wireasrope and and
furrows the pulley
pits, aregroove,
no longerthe size
of wear with
obvious debristhebecomes
increasingsmaller
contactand smaller.
load. The wearThemechanism
wear surface of the
under wire
large rope be-
contact
comes smoother
load is mainly and the
adhesive wear.damage characteristics, such as furrows and pits, are no
(5) longer
Surfaceobvious with thethe
wear accelerates increasing contact
fracture speed ofload. Therope
the wire wear andmechanism
causes theunder
brokenlarge
wire
contactposition
load istomainly
be concentrated
adhesive wear.under bending fatigue condition. An increase in
contact load
(5) Surface wearleads the maximum
accelerates bending
the fracture speed fatigue
of thecycles
wireof the and
rope worncauses
wire rope to
the broken
decrease from approximately 7700 to 4850. The bending fatigue
wire position to be concentrated under bending fatigue condition. An increase in con- life of the wire rope
tact load leads the maximum bending fatigue cycles of the worn wire rope to decrease
from approximately 7700 to 4850. The bending fatigue life of the wire rope decreases
Lubricants 2022, 10, 337 18 of 19
decreases with an increase in sliding contact load. The fracture failure mechanism of
the wire rope is mainly brittle fracture.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, X.C. (Xiangdong Chang) and X.C. (Xiao Chen); method-
ology, X.C. (Xiangdong Chang) and X.C. (Xiao Chen); validation, Y.D. and H.L.; investigation, Y.D.
and W.T.; data curation, Q.Z. and K.H.; writing—original draft preparation, X.C. (Xiangdong Chang)
and X.C. (Xiao Chen); writing—review and editing, Y.D. and H.L.; visualization, W.T., Q.Z. and K.H.;
supervision, Y.D. and H.L.; project administration, X.C. (Xiangdong Chang); funding acquisition, X.C.
(Xiangdong Chang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers
52005272 and 51975572. This project is also partly supported by Priority Academic Program Devel-
opment of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), Top-notch Academic Programs Project of
Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (TAPP).
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the
corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Zhang, D.; Yang, X.; Chen, K.; Zhang, Z. Fretting Fatigue Behavior of Steel Wires Contact Interface Under Different Crossing
Angles. Wear 2018, 400–401, 52–61. [CrossRef]
2. Guerra-Fuentes, L.; Torres-López, M.; Hernandez-Rodriguez, M.A.L.; Garcia-Sanchez, E. Failure Analysis of Steel Wire Rope
Used in Overhead Crane System. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 118, 104893. [CrossRef]
3. Pal, U.; Mukhopadhyay, G.; Sharma, A.; Bhattacharya, S. Failure Analysis of Wire Rope of Ladle Crane in Steel Making Shop. Int.
J. Fatigue 2018, 116, 149–155. [CrossRef]
4. Wang, D.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Ge, S. Effect of Various Kinematic Parameters of Mine Hoist on Fretting Parameters of Hoisting
Rope and a New Fretting Fatigue Test Apparatus of Steel Wires. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2012, 22, 92–112. [CrossRef]
5. Wang, D.; Zhang, J.; Ge, S.; Zhang, D.; Shi, G. Mechanical Behavior of Hoisting Rope in 2 Km Ultra Deep Coal Mine. Eng. Fail.
Anal. 2019, 106, 104185. [CrossRef]
6. Hakala, T.J.; Laukkanen, A.; Suhonen, T.; Holmberg, K. A Finite-Element Model for a Paste Lubricated Steel Wire vs. Cast Iron
Contact. Tribol. Int. 2020, 150, 106362. [CrossRef]
7. Zhang, J.; Wang, D.; Zhang, D.; Ge, S.; Araújo, J.A. Dynamic Contact and Slip Characteristics of Bent Hoisting Rope in Coal Mine.
J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2018, 40, 1–9. [CrossRef]
8. Singh, R.P.; Mallick, M.; Verma, M.K. Studies on Failure Behaviour of Wire Rope Used in Underground Coal Mines. Eng. Fail.
Anal. 2016, 70, 290–304. [CrossRef]
9. Wang, D.; Zhang, D.; Ge, S. Effect of Displacement Amplitude on Fretting Fatigue Behavior of Hoisting Rope Wires in Low Cycle
Fatigue. Tribol. Int. 2012, 52, 178–189. [CrossRef]
10. Wang, D.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, D.; Wang, D.A. Dynamic Wear Evolution and Crack Propagation Behaviors of Steel Wires
During Fretting-Fatigue. Tribol. Int. 2016, 101, 348–355. [CrossRef]
11. Cruzado, A.; Hartelt, M.; Wäsche, R.; Urchegui, M.A.; Gómez, X. Fretting Wear of Thin Steel Wires. Part 1: Influence of Contact
Pressure. Wear 2010, 268, 1409–1416. [CrossRef]
12. Cruzado, A.; Hartelt, M.; Wäsche, R.; Urchegui, M.A.; Gómez, X. Fretting Wear of Thin Steel Wires. Part 2: Influence of Crossing
Angle. Wear 2011, 273, 60–69. [CrossRef]
13. Cruzado, A.; Urchegui, M.A.; Gómez, X. Finite Element Modeling of Fretting Wear Scars in the Thin Steel Wires: Application in
Crossed Cylinder Arrangements. Wear 2014, 318, 98–105. [CrossRef]
14. Xu, C.; Peng, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Lu, H.; Chen, G.; Wang, D.; Peng, X.; Wang, S. Fretting Friction and Wear of Steel Wires in Tension-Torsion
and Helical Contact Form. Wear 2019, 432–433, 202946. [CrossRef]
15. Kumar, K.; Goyal, D.; Banwait, S.S. Effect of Key Parameters on Fretting Behaviour of Wire Rope: A Review. Arch. Comput. Method
Eng. 2020, 27, 549–561. [CrossRef]
16. Wang, D.; Song, D.; Wang, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, C.; Wang, D.A.; Araújo, J.A. Tribo-Fatigue Behaviors of Steel Wires Under
Coupled Tension-Torsion in Different Environmental Media. Wear 2019, 420–421, 38–53. [CrossRef]
17. Sun, Z.; Xu, C.; Peng, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Y. Fretting Tribological Behaviors of Steel Wires Under Lubricating Grease with Compound
Additives of Graphene and Graphite. Wear 2020, 454–455, 203333. [CrossRef]
18. Peng, Y.; Chang, X.; Sun, S.; Zhu, Z.; Gong, X.; Zou, S.; Xu, W.; Mi, Z. The Friction and Wear Properties of Steel Wire Rope Sliding
Against Itself Under Impact Load. Wear 2018, 400–401, 194–206. [CrossRef]
19. Peng, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhu, Z.; Chang, X.; Lu, H.; Tang, W.; Jiang, F.; Chen, G. Effect of Low Temperature on Tribological
Characteristics and Wear Mechanism of Wire Rope. Tribol. Int. 2021, 164, 107231. [CrossRef]
Lubricants 2022, 10, 337 19 of 19
20. Oksanen, V.; Andersson, P.; Valtonen, K.; Holmberg, K.; Kuokkala, V.T. Characterization of the Wear of Nodular Cast Iron Rollers
in Contact with Wire Ropes. Wear 2013, 308, 199–205. [CrossRef]
21. Oksanen, V.; Valtonen, K.; Andersson, P.; Vaajoki, A.; Laukkanen, A.; Holmberg, K.; Kuokkala, V.T. Comparison of Laboratory
Rolling–Sliding Wear Tests with in-Service Wear of Nodular Cast Iron Rollers Against Wire Ropes. Wear 2015, 340–341, 73–81.
[CrossRef]
22. Chang, X.; Peng, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Gong, X.; Yu, Z.; Mi, Z.; Xu, C. Experimental Investigation of Mechanical Response and Fracture
Failure Behavior of Wire Rope with Different Given Surface Wear. Tribol. Int. 2018, 119, 208–221. [CrossRef]
23. Jikal, A.; Majid, F.; Chaffoui, H.; Meziane, M.; Elghorba, M. Corrosion Influence on Lifetime Prediction to Determine the Wöhler
Curves of Outer Layer Strand of a Steel Wire Rope. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 109, 104253. [CrossRef]
24. Chen, Y.; Qin, W.; Wang, Q.; Tan, H. Influence of Corrosion Pit on the Tensile Mechanical Properties of a Multi-Layered Wire Rope
Strand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 302, 124387. [CrossRef]
25. Wahid, A.; Mouhib, N.; Ouardi, A.; Sabah, F.; Chakir, H.; ELghorba, M. Experimental Prediction of Wire Rope Damage by Energy
Method. Eng. Struct. 2019, 201, 109794. [CrossRef]
26. Battini, D.; Solazzi, L.; Lezzi, A.M.; Clerici, F.; Donzella, G. Prediction of Steel Wire Rope Fatigue Life Based on Thermal
Measurements. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2020, 182, 105761. [CrossRef]
27. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Peng, Y.; Chang, X.; Chen, G. Tribological behavior of octadecylamine functionalized graphene oxide
modified oil for wire rope in mine hoist. Wear 2022, 494, 204273. [CrossRef]
28. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Peng, Y.; Wang, C.; Chang, X.; Chen, G. Preparation and Tribological Properties of Lanthanum Stearate
Modified Lubricating Oil for Wire Rope in a Mine Hoist. Materials 2021, 14, 5821. [CrossRef]
29. Chang, X.; Peng, Y.; Cheng, D.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, D.; Lu, H.; Tang, W.; Chen, G. Influence of Different Corrosive Environments on
Friction and Wear Characteristics of Lubricated Wire Ropes in a Multi-Layer Winding System. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022, 131, 105901.
[CrossRef]
30. McColl, I.R.; Waterhouse, R.B.; Harris, S.J.; Tsujikawa, M. Lubricated fretting wear of a high-strength eutectoid steel rope wire.
Wear 1995, 185, 203–212. [CrossRef]
31. Périer, V.; Dieng, L.; Gaillet, L.; Fouvry, S. Influence of an aqueous environment on the fretting behaviour of steel wires used in
civil engineering cables. Wear 2011, 271, 1585–1593. [CrossRef]
32. Molnár, V.; Fedorko, G.; Krešák, J.; Peterka, P.; Fabianová, J. The influence of corrosion on the life of steel ropes and prediction of
their decommissioning. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2017, 74, 119–132. [CrossRef]
33. Wu, S.; Chen, H.; Ramandi, H.L.; Hagan, P.C.; Crosky, A.; Saydam, S. Effects of environmental factors on stress corrosion cracking
of cold-drawn high-carbon steel wires. Corros. Sci. 2018, 132, 234–243. [CrossRef]
34. Krbata, M.; Eckert, M.; Majerik, J.; Barenyi, I. Wear Behavior of High Strength Tool Steel 90MnCrV8 in Contact with Si3N4. Metals
2020, 10, 756. [CrossRef]
35. Krbata, M.; Eckert, M.; Bartosova, L.; Barenyi, I.; Majerik, J.; Mikuš, P.; Rendkova, P. Dry Sliding Friction of Tool Steels and Their
Comparison of Wear in Contact with ZrO2 and X46Cr13. Materials 2020, 13, 2359. [CrossRef]
36. Chang, X.; Peng, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Gong, X.; Yu, Z.; Mi, Z.; Xu, C. Effects of Strand Lay Direction and Crossing Angle on Tribological
Behavior of Winding Hoist Rope. Materials 2017, 10, 630. [CrossRef]
37. Chang, X.; Peng, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zou, S.; Gong, X.; Xu, C. Evolution Properties of Tribological Parameters for Steel Wire Rope under
Sliding Contact Conditions. Metals 2018, 8, 743. [CrossRef]
38. Studeny, Z.; Krbata, M.; Dobrocky, D.; Eckert, M.; Ciger, R.; Kohutiar, M.; Mikus, P. Analysis of Tribological Properties of
Powdered Tool Steels M390 and M398 in Contact with Al2 O3 . Materials 2022, 15, 7562. [CrossRef]
39. Chang, X.; Peng, Y.; Cheng, D.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, D. The Correlation Between Wear Evolution and Mechanical Property Degradation
of Wire Rope in a Multilayer Winding System. J. Tribol. 2022, 144, 091702. [CrossRef]
40. Han, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Cui, W.; Wang, D. Tribo-Fatigue Characteristics of Braided Wire Rope for Traction Under Low Cycle
Bending Fatigue. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2021, 235, 6529–6540. [CrossRef]
41. Hanke, S.; Dos Santos, J.F. Comparative Study of Severe Plastic Deformation at Elevated Temperatures of Two Aluminium Alloys
During Friction Surfacing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2017, 247, 257–267. [CrossRef]
42. Zhang, D.; Feng, C.; Chen, K.; Wang, D.; Ni, X. Effect of Broken Wire on Bending Fatigue Characteristics of Wire Ropes. Int. J.
Fatigue 2017, 103, 456–465. [CrossRef]
43. Zhang, D.; Chen, K.; Jia, X.; Wang, D.; Wang, S.; Luo, Y.; Ge, S. Bending Fatigue Behaviour of Bearing Ropes Working Around
Pulleys of Different Materials. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2013, 33, 37–47. [CrossRef]