Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 1 views

    Ielts Art

    Uploaded by

    Laish Christle Capiendo

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ielts Art

    Uploaded by

    Laish Christle Capiendo
    1 views2 pages

    Original Title

    IELTS ART

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    1 views2 pages

    Ielts Art

    Uploaded by

    Laish Christle Capiendo

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Should the government continue to fund various kinds of artist like

    musicians, painters and poets or not anymore? Discuss both views

    Argument

    1. promotes economic growth

    2. social cohesiveness

    3. promotes creativeness and self-awareness

    Reason

    1. more job opportunities, trades, attracts tourisms

    2. brings people together

    3. critical thinking, freedom of expression, knowledge dissemination

    Example

    Argument 2.

    1. government lacks resources

    2. private companies should fund it

    3. bias with other talents

    Art and Music are essential part of people’s lives. It is a skill that one must be
    supported to develop, and it may lead to various opportunities locally and
    abroad as well. It is difficult to imagine life without it as life will be dull and
    dark. With that being said, it is inevitable that some arguments arose such as
    whether the government should allocate funds to support artists such as
    painters, poets and musicians or not.

    Nowadays, art and music are not only used as a past time activity, but it also
    brings numerous advantages to society. Apparently, this can promote
    economic growth as it provides not only several jobs but also business
    opportunities. It has been observed that there are artists who were
    discovered and converted their skills into a tremendous source of income. In
    addition, exhibits and concerts also attract tourists. Therefore, it creates a
    drastic positive outcome in global tourism. And thus, it also promotes social
    cohesiveness and great cultural diversity as people get together no matter
    what nationalities are to enjoy what art and music can offer. For example,
    foreigners tend to visit to other parts of the world just to visit museums,
    exhibits and heritages, people also spend time to travel and allot leisure
    funds to see their favorite artists.

    Moreover, art and music are not just about singing or creating masterpieces,
    but it is also a medium for freedom of expression and imparting knowledge
    and information. It has been observed that these activities develop creativity
    and promote critical thinking. Hence, with positive outcomes, the
    government is encouraged to allocate funds to support it.

    On the contrary, most people argue that there are more issues that the
    government must prioritize such as education, health care and
    infrastructures as in today’s world it is undeniable that the government lacks
    funds to provide people with their needs in these aspects. Several individuals
    also claims that these activities must be funded by the private sectors and if
    the artists are competitively talented they do not need the budget from the
    government and they can work themselves to the top.

    I therefore conclude that with more positive effects that art and music bring
    to our country the government should seek ways to include art and music in
    the funds. I believe, without corruption, enough budget can be raised to
    combat issues of health, education and infrastructures as well as art and
    music.

    You might also like