Agile Methodology Manual
Agile Methodology Manual
Agile Methodology Manual
In Agile development, testing needs to happen early and often. So, instead of waiting
for development to be finished before testing begins, testing happens continuously
as features are added.
Tests are prioritized just like user stories. Testers aim to get through as many tests
as they can in an iteration. Adding automated testing tools can help testers get
through more of the testing backlog.
>> Learn how to transition to Agile testing. Get the white paper >>
Agile development is often driven by tests. Developers use Agile testing methods like
TDD (test-driven development) to write the test first. Then they write the code that
will be verified by the test. And developers and Agile testers should collaborate
before user stories (e.g., requirements) are set.
It’s important that both Agile testers and developers know what has been tested and
what defects still need to be resolved.
It doesn’t matter which Agile test methodology you use — Scrum, XP, Kanban. The
following are typically used for Agile testing methods.
Test-driven development (TDD) starts with tests. This type of development begins by
discussing what you want to test and then creating a user story. So, you start by
writing a unit test. Then you write the user story. Finally, you write the code until the
unit test passes.
TDD is typically used on unit and component tests — which can be done with
automated testing tools. TDD makes sure the features are working as they should
be.
ATDD is typically used for acceptance tests. It verifies that the product functions as
users would expect.
BDD is also used for acceptance tests. It verifies that the product functions are
necessary for the desired business outcome.
Exploratory Testing
Exploratory testing is a style of testing that lets testers follow their intuition — rather
than a predefined path. It’s typically manual. You record what you’re doing and save
it as a test. And you figure out what exactly it is that you’re testing as you go.
Exploratory testing is typically used to find hidden risks within a product. These
would be bugs that are missed in functional tests done in TDD.
Session-Based Testing
Session-based testing has some similarities to exploratory testing. But there’s a little
more structure in session-based testing. Instead of figuring out what you’re testing as
you go, you start with a mission in mind.
>> Learn how to reduce risk with exploratory testing. Get the white paper >>
So, there needs to be an Agile test strategy rather than an Agile test plan.
There are many ways to outline your Agile test strategy. You may simply outline the
strategy in a document. You might create a test matrix. Or, you might use a Kanban
board.
No matter which Agile test methodology you take, your strategy should include:
Creating an Agile test strategy is easy when you’re using the right testing tools —
such as Helix ALM.
The backlog includes user stories — the items that need to be developed and tested.
These are prioritized in order of importance. And this example shows development
and testing in progress — and tests that have been completed.
You’ll find and fix errors faster. So, you’ll lower the risk of finding a bug at the very
end of testing — and missing a deadline.
You’ll make customers happy by delivering regular releases. So, you’ll improve
customer retention rates.
And you’ll manage the scope of each release. That helps you prioritize features for
each iteration and deliver the most important ones first.
Of course, there will be some challenges with Agile testing. But the future of
development is Agile. It’s time for testers to embrace it.
Regression testing in Agile is best done with test automation and continuous testing
tools. This keeps teams focused on innovation through new features and releases. It
reveals defects early on in the process. This reduces risk as well as the time it takes
developers to fix them.
It helps find major defects after an update and soon enough so that it can be
fixed with minimal impact on customers.
It creates a risk mitigation strategy so that companies can stay ahead of the
curve with changes and fix problems before they really become issues.
It modifies code for new features so that the software can still meet any
requirements or business flows without causing problems.
It can run 24/7 which frees up testers for exploratory testing.
Execution Schedule
What does your execution schedule for the regression suite look like? Think about
whether it will be beneficial to do this weekly, daily, or by some other schedule.
Will all regression tests in the regression suite be executed from the main CI engine?
Or are there others executed from a different scheduler?
What triggers regression suite maintenance and improvements? Are there certain
events that inspire maintenance?
Analysis
Are you continuously analyzing the value of your tests? Find out which are flaky,
which aren’t producing the value you need, etc. Adapt to what you determine your
testing needs.
Continuous Testing
One round isn’t enough. Performing continuous testing is how you’ll get the most out
of your regression tests, and it should be a process incorporated into overall
DevOps.
1. Understand Scope
Testing can vary in scope, time windows, platform coverage, and objectives. It’s
important to understand the differences in these scopes if you’re running sprint-level
regression tests or full regression test cycles.
Like all types of testing, you need to stay up to date with your regression suites.
Keep in mind both the high-value functional and the non-functional
scenarios. Always maintain the high-priority, high-value test cases in your
suite. Ensure that your entire team is aligned to which test cases are top priority.
3. Automate the Right Tests
If a test is difficult to automate or scale, you’re risking the whole cycle and are better
off leaving it out. If a test is not able to be automated, strongly consider leaving it out
of the regression suite.
5. Track ROI
ROI is important. Teams should always keep track of the ROI of executions. Make
sure that reports from your regression testing tools are transparent, and that you can
see the real results of test executions over time.
Compare and track what the differences are when processes and tests are run on
different platforms. We also recommend assigning grades to test scenarios, so that
you’re ensuring you’re properly prioritizing.
Bottom Line
Know why tests failed and fix them quickly with Perfecto’s test reporting. See all your
test results in one unified place — including a CI dashboard, heatmaps, and
individual test reports. Rich artifacts like screenshots, videos, HAR files, and vitals
help you understand what went wrong. And ML-powered noise filtering keeps you
focused on real defects, not noise.
Perfecto can help you leverage automated regression testing — and test more,
faster. Try Perfecto’s all-in-one cloud testing platform. See how easy it is to create,
execute, and analyze tests. Explore for 240 free minutes, test real user conditions,
and get detailed analytics.
What's the difference between manual testing vs. automation testing? That's what
we break down in this blog. Plus, you'll learn about the best type of testing.
When manually testing, the tester validates the key features of a software
application. Analysts execute test cases and develop summary error reports without
specialized automation tools.
Learn how to transition from manual testing to automated testing in 7 steps >>
Automation testing is the process in which testers utilize tools and scripts to
automate testing efforts.
Automation testing helps testers execute more test cases and improve test
coverage. When comparing manual vs. automation testing, manual takes longer.
Automated testing is more efficient.
Automation testing involves testers writing test scripts that automate test
execution. (A test script is a set of instructions to be performed on target platforms to
validate a feature or expected outcome.)
Both have their strengths and weaknesses. Manual testing is slow and tedious. But
its strength is that it better handles complex scenarios. Automated testing requires
coding and test maintenance. But on the plus side, it is much faster and covers many
more permutations.
Try Testing With Perfecto
Here's a quick comparison table of the differences between manual vs. automation
testing.
Aspect of
Manual Automation
Testing
Done automatically using automation tools and
Test Execution Done manually by QA testers
scripts
Time-consuming and less
Test Efficiency More testing in less time and greater efficiency
efficient
Most tasks can be automated, including real
Types of Tasks Entirely manual tasks
user simulations
Difficult to ensure sufficient test
Test Coverage Easy to ensure greater test coverage
coverage
The biggest pro of automation testing over manual testing is that it allows you to do
more testing in less time. It increases productivity and expands how much you can
test.
Users choose automated testing over manual testing mainly because of time. In fact,
automated testing was developed because manual testing is so time consuming.
Automated testing is much faster.
Automated testing reduces repetitive manual tasks during the testing phase.
However, automated testing does require some manual work during the
implementation stage. Testers need to manually create the baseline testing scripts.
Test scripts are written in code like Java, JavaScript, Python, or C#. Writing test
scripts can be complex, so in automated testing, specialized tools help testers
develop code and test scripts.
Plus, test scripts can be reused. This adds efficiency further down the line.
More Automation
Test automation tools have come a long way. They can now automate even highly
advanced tests, thanks to real user simulation technology.
This includes:
Face ID
Location mocking
Fingerprint testing
Network virtualization
Image and voice-related testing
Another pro of automated testing vs. manual testing is increased test coverage.
Automation testing can actually deliver better results because of its ability for
increased test coverage.
Manual testing can only cover a certain number of device and OS permutations. But
automated testing can cover many more. This leads to better error detection.
Repetitive, high-frequency tests can easily be automated. But tests should not be
automated if they occur infrequently, are high risk, or are subject to change.
Here are some instances when you would want live testing instead of automated
testing:
So, manual testing is still important. But adding automated testing makes your
manual tests more efficient.
The main biggest pro of continuous testing in Agile is to protect your brand’s
reputation and the user experience — without sacrificing delivery. Releasing sub-
standard software is a risk to a business’s bottom line.
Automated testing dramatically improves upon the results of manual testing. But
continuous testing takes software testing to the ultimate finish line.
If you can implement continuous testing in a stable and scalable manner, you will
get:
Faster feedback
Quick-release turnaround
High customer satisfaction and loyalty
Perfecto empowers you to do continuous testing and utilize test automation. With
our continuous testing platform, you'll have everything you need to deliver better user
experiences. This includes:
See for yourself how Perfecto will take your testing to the next level. Try Perfecto for
free today.