Haas 2017-2018

BERKELEY‐HAAS
CONSULTING CLUB
INTERVIEW PREPARATION
GUIDE AND CASE BOOK
FALL 2017 – SPRING 2018

Before you begin…
• This guide is meant to supplement your consulting

recruiting preparation. The contents of this guide
reflect the authors’ best judgment but do not claim
to be universal truths held by all firms and all
interviewers.
• While studying how to do cases and identifying best

practices is helpful, you must develop your own style
to succeed. For example, interviewers can easily
identify “canned” frameworks.
• When using this guide (and other resources), always

ask yourself if this makes sense for you. It is best to
take in information from a variety of resources and
synthesize.
2
Contents
1) Management consulting recruiting process

2) The case interview
3) The behavioral interview
4) Practice cases
3
Recruiting for consulting has two critical workstreams
1 2
Get the interview Ace the interview
• Build consulting‐tailored • Prepare for the case interview

resume & cover letter that • Prepare for the behavioral interview
highlight the right skills and • Prepare for other assessments as
characteristics necessary
• Network to show interest and gain
insights into firm cultures
• Research to see which firms /
offices / practices to apply to
• There is a lot to do, but there are resources to help; use them! See p. 28 for more information
• Do these workstreams simultaneously, not sequentially
• Don’t wait until you have an interview invite before you start preparing. Regular preparation
starting in Fall will be far more fruitful and allow you time to incorporate feedback.
• Case interview prep is (typically) the most time‐intensive item and requires the most lead‐time
4
Knowing what the firms are looking for helps you prepare
Value addition Communication Team
• Structured thinking • Crystalizing the • Cultural fit

• Analytics / quantitative message • “Airport Test”
reasoning / problem solving • Delivering information • Effective team player
• Creativity effectively • Peer mentor
• Managing client
relationship
• Get clarity on each firm’s focus areas by talking to people from that firm; there are a lot
of similarities but each firm has its own flavor best uncovered through networking
conversations and to a lesser extent through marketing materials (e.g. website)
• When preparing for interviews and drafting your resume, ask yourself “am I
highlighting consulting‐relevant skills?”
5
Getting the interview
• Invest time tailoring to consulting

• Look at the career center ’s resume book
1 Resume &
Cover Letter • Prepare for multiple (5+) revisions
• Put yourself in the reviewer ’s shoes and
ask: am I conveying the brand I want?
• Key items to research:

• Firm‐specific: How do firms differ,
Getting both technically (e.g., staffing,
2 Research
the travel) and culturally?
• Office‐specific: What is the work mix
interview among functions and industries?
• Above all be genuine in your interactions

• Don’t ask questions that you can find
answers to on the web
3 Networking • Demonstrate interest by asking questions
that show you did your homework
• This portion of the process can be as
evaluative as the interview.
6
So what exactly is “Networking”?
Networking is more art than science ‐ not hard to be good, but

easy to be bad!
• At its core, networking is the act of building connections with others
• Networking does not mean trying to build lifelong relationships in 10 minutes; rather
networking accomplishes two things:
• Get “insider ” information about the firm, which may be helpful in crafting your
answer to “Why this firm?”
• Show initiative and interest in a firm, which also facilitates name recognition
during initial resume screens
DOs DON’Ts
• Start off with simple questions: How long have • Corner a recruiter/partner/etc. and monopolize the
you been at X? Why did you choose X? What conversation. This is just as awkward for them as it
types of projects have you worked on? is for your peers.
• Ask for a business card at the end – this is a • Ask obvious questions or bring up inappropriate
natural way to bring a conversation to a close topics (compensation, projected hiring,
• Send a thank you note if you made had a competitors)
meaningful conversation! It shows that • Spend too much time with one individual. Even
you appreciate their time, and this is an if the conversation is going great – end on a high
opportunity to implant your name. note, meet some other people, and give your
peers a chance to move around
7
Acing the interview
• Case: Practice, practice, practice

‐ Structured approach to problem solving
• Behavioral / Experience Interview: PARs*

‐ Identify typical questions
‐ Identify your best stories
‐ Prepare answers to the questions
• Other: Keeping up with pleasantries

‐ Questions for them
‐ Chitchat
* Note: PAR = “Problem Action Result”. PAR is framework for sequencing answers to behavioral questions
8
Internship recruiting timeline
Indicative internship recruiting & preparation timeline
• Talk to consultant • Haas Consulting Days • Drop resumes, • Finalize behavioral • 1st round interviews
classmates • Invest heavily in case prep some with cover • Finalize case prep by early Jan*
• Speakers series • Get to know the firms letters (~Nov 29)
• 2nd round / results
• Work on resume and their people • Get invites
by late Jan‐early
• Think through key stories • Polish cases
Feb
for behavioral prep • Behavioral prep
• Finalize resume and cover
letters
*Plan to interview the week before classes begin
Sept Oct / Nov Dec Winter Break Jan / Feb
• This is a long‐term project; invest time upfront designing a good plan!
• Procrastination is costly. Consider making an “interview prep” buddy as

peer pressure is a great way to keep each other on track.
9
Full‐time recruiting timeline
Indicative full‐time recruiting & preparation timeline
• Draft resume • Get invites • 1st rd. interviews by

• Meet the firms • Polish cases early Oct
• 2nd rd. results by late
• Research • Behavioral prep
Oct/Nov
• Start case prep • Finalize behavioral
• Invest heavily in case prep • Finalize cases
• Develop relationships • Drop resumes
• Begin behavioral prep
Summer / Aug Sep / Oct Oct / Nov
• This is an aggressive timeline.

• To be successful you should decide early if consulting is for you and fully
commit to the OCR process.
10
Interviews are ~45 minutes & have behavioral and case components
Intro / Case Questions

pleasantries ~20-25 minutes ~5 minutes
~5 min
Behavorial
~5-10 minutes
• This is the most common interview format, but there are firm and
interview round variations
• Cases that end early could be normal for that case, a good sign that it went really
well, or a sign that it didn’t go so well, so don’t read too much into it
11
A framework for a successful job search
• Haas is full of awesome, worthwhile ways to spend your time and you can’t do
1 PRIORITIES: all (or even most) of them
Know what you • If you don’t have your priorities straight you’ll wind up over committed,
overstretched, and you might not reach your goals
want • Give yourself permission to say no to things so you can focus
• Your job search is too important to leave managing it exclusively to yourself!

2 PEOPLE: • Leverage your fellow classmates who are consulting job seekers to share
Recruiting is a resources, hone your thinking (e.g. debate the ideal profitability framework),
and practice interviews
team sport • Cultivate coaches who have gone through the process and can guide you
3 PLAN: • Consulting recruiting is a “solved problem” – before you draft your plan, ask
several people who were successful what they did
Work smart • For case prep, instead of focusing on quantity, be intentional about what
you want to improve in each case prep session
4 • For most people, the consulting job search is a lot of work; accept it, plan for it,
PERSISTENCE: and do it
Work hard • Think marathon, not a sprint – much better to chip away every day than cram
right before the interview
• The work pays off – on average, people who (intelligently) put the time in do
better than those who invest less time
12
Common pitfalls – and solutions
• Many people fall into the trap of starting prep late, often thinking that they “can
1 Starting late crank it out over winter break”
• However, some of the best resources for effective prep (career coaches, firm
“coffee chats”, other preparing students) are only really available during the
semester, and available slots tend to run out fast
• Solution: starting early helps!
• Your goal isn’t to work hard preparing; it is to actually improve

2 Don’t prepare • People can get into cycle where they do a lot of “low quality” cases without
effectively learning from them
• Solution: if you do a case, do it well. See a Peer Advisor early and often, seek
high‐value case partners, know what skills you need to focus on as you
progress, and spend time after the case redoing areas that were weak the first
time through (example: redesign / represent framework, redo conclusion)
• People typically “respect” the case prep process since it is a new skill, but
3 Under‐index on people are often overconfident with their behavioral prep (and are more likely
behavioral prep to go in cold). The result is a story that falls flat or annoys the interviewer.
• Solution: spending enough time to nail your behavioral prep is worth it! Make
an effort to start every case with a behavioral question, and work on turning
your “Walk me through your resume” and “Tell me about yourself” answers into
real stories.
13
Outline

4) Practice cases
14
Case interviews require you to solve a problem
Behavioral / experience
Case interview
interview
• Requires you to describe what you • Requires you to solve a problem

did or will do
• Shows your ability to answer
questions clearly & powerfully • Shows ability to perform
• Demonstrates “story‐telling” skills

• Typically multiple questions • Typically one major question or topic
• Case interviews test your ability to take a complex problem, break it down into
a reasonable approach, and then drive for a solution
• Case interviews are often new to applicants so they typically require the lion’s
share of preparation time
15
Case interviews vary widely in format
Interviewee Interviewer Other

Written Case
Led Case Led Case
• Most common • The interviewer • Requires you to • Deloitte / Monitor:
presents the quickly analyze a Group written case
• The interviewee large amount of (Typically reserved
directs the case, interviewee with
specific stages / written for 2nd round)
with prodding information,
from the phases with
specific questions answer questions,
interviewer then present /
• Most practice • Similar to, but defend the results
cases are written more structured to interviewers
in this format than an
interviewee led • Example: Bain, LEK,
• Example: Bain, case ATK, Parthenon‐EY
BCG, Deloitte, ATK
• Example: McK
• While the formats vary, the skills tested are the largely the same. That said, it is still
worth your while to get comfortable with each format you expect to encounter
16
Case interviews vary widely in format
Interviewee‐led Interviewer led Written

Other
Case Case Case
• Most common • The interviewer • Requires you to • Deloitte / Monitor:
presents the quickly analyze a Group written case
• The interviewee
interviewee with large amount of (Typically reserved
directs the case,
specific stages / written for 2nd round)
with prodding
phases with information,
from the
specific questions answer questions,
interviewer
then present /
• Similar to, but
• Most practice defend the results
more structured
cases are written to interviewers
than an
in this format
interviewee led • Example: Bain, LEK,
• Example: Bain, case ATK, Parthenon‐EY
BCG, Deloitte, ATK
• Example: McK
• While the formats vary, the skills tested are the largely the same. That said, it is still
worth your while to get comfortable with each format you expect to encounter
17
Typical differences between first round & second round cases
First Round Second Round
• Interviewer: managers • Partners, senior managers

• Standardized cases • Less standardized cases
• More handouts • Less handouts
• More often “typical” case topics • More often “oddball” case
topics
• Cases tend to be less structured in second round interviews (but not always)
• Still need to show breadth and depth of thinking & apply structured thinking
to problems
18
Interviews tend to differ by firm
Regular case Solely behavioral Presentation Comments
• Interviewer‐led
• Some use iPads
• Interviewee‐led
• Interviewee‐led
• Can use group case

for presentation
• Five behavioral
interviews
• Written case in
final round
• Phone interviews
in round 1
• Uses brain teasers
19
Internship interview round specifics by top firms
Round 1 Round 2
Types/Numbers Specifics Types/Numbers Specifics
• 2 interviews • Do care about • 3 interviews • Regular cases
• 60 min each behavioral (lots of • 60 min each • Stronger behavioral
(15+45) follow‐up questions) (15+45)
• 2 interviews • Charts heavy (up to 5 • 2 interviews • Lots of brainstorms
• 45 min each dense charts per • 45 min each • Little behavioral
(5+40) case) (5+40)
• 2 interviews • Charts heavy (up to 3 • 4 interviews • Written (60 min)
• 40 min each charts per case) • 60+40+40+40 • Presentation (40 min)
(5+35) • Written prompt • Solely behavioral (40)
• Regular case (40)
• 2 interviews • One solely behavioral • 3 interviews • Group interview
• 30 min each • Chart heavy (up to 5 slides • 45 min each • Solely behavioral
w 2‐3 charts each) • Charts heavy case
• 2 interviews • Solely behavioral • 3 interviews • Two solely behavioral
• 45 min each • 45+45+100 • Presentation (60 for
prep, 40 to present)
• 2 interviews • One on market sizing • 2 interviews • Presentation (60 for
• 30 min each • One on mini‐case • 100+30 prep, 40 to present)
(5+25) • Regular case (30)
• 2 interviews • One on Math • 3 interviews • Presentation (60 for
• 30 min each • One on mini‐case • 45+45+100 prep, 40 to present)
(5+25) • Phone interviews • Regular case (45)
• Market sizing and mini‐
• 2 interviews • Regular cases • 2 interviews
case (45)
• 45 min each • Little to zero behavioral • 60 min each • Regular case
(5+25) • Brain teaser
20
Presentation interviews by top firms (varies by office location)
Preparation Presentation
• N/A • N/A
• N/A • N/A
• You are provided with deck of 40‐50 slides, • You are to build 7‐10 slides (pick some from
prompt, templates and questions deck + create some own ones)
• 1 hour to get ready • 45 min to present to a partner (not client)
• Group of 4‐5 candidates get 4‐5 roles (e.g. • Each team‐member presents its part
financial, ops, strategy) and deck • 15‐20 min to present to two partners/clients,
• 30 min to get ready on your workstream 25‐30 min for Q&A on the firm
• 2 days in advance you receive a several page • You are to draw your own 4‐7 slides
case with lots of text and data • 40 min to present to a partner who plays
• At interview you get questions and 1 hour role of a client
• You are provided with deck of 70 slides • You are to structure the case, have
• 1 hour to get ready hypotheses, no slide production needed
• 40 min for a partner‐led discussion
• You are provided with deck of 15‐20 slides • You are to make a presentation of 7‐10
without tags slides (mainly from deck), fulfill the tags
• 1 hour to get prepared • 40 min to present to a partner
• N/A • N/A
21
Components of a case
1 2 3
Getting started Running the case Wrapping it up
• Use of paper • Structured • Answer the

• Receiving the thinking & question
prompt communication • Short and
• Framework • Driving the case sweet
• Public math
• Receiving
feedback
22
Example case: “Carlos’ Rafting Business”
The goal of this section is to demonstrate what a case interview looks like and call out focus
areas. See example mock case interview video here* and track with comments below.
Section
Section &
&
Comments
Comments
Timestamp
Timestamp
Receiving the prompt – • You will have a lot of information thrown at you, so make sure you effectively use your
0:41 paper and take concise notes. Develop your own short hand
• Consulting skills highlighted: taking in a lot of information effectively
Summarize & clarify the • Summarize: You need to make sure you know exactly what you are being asked; it is
prompt – 1:12 surprisingly easy to answer the wrong question! Make sure you understand the
question by briefly restating it back to the interviewer. “Brief ” means ~1‐2 sentences
• Clarify: You can ask a few questions before developing your framework. These should
be focused on giving you enough info to develop a framework, not enough for solving
the whole case. Keep these questions at the appropriate level (if you need them)
• Consulting skills highlighted: honing in on the key issue, asking relevant questions
Draft your framework – • Signal you are ready to draft your approach to the problem and take some time to do
1:46 so. Good to be under 60 seconds (and better to be under 45 seconds).
• Consulting skills highlighted: working quickly, structured thinking & problem solving,
being MECE
* URL: http://youtu.be/hudXW7nv4sA. Original source: Tuck Case Book 2009, “Carlos’ Rafting Business”
23
Example case: “Carlos’ Rafting Business” (cont’d)
Section &
Comments
Timestamp
Presenting your • Now you get to present your approach to the case. Note that the paper you just drew
framework – 2:55 out only exists to help your communication with the interviewer, so don’t spend your
time looking down at it. Similarly, it is ok to speak to things that aren’t explicitly
written down, as long as it “fits” with what you have on paper
• As a rough rule of thumb, try to present your framework in under 90 seconds
(excluding questions the interviewer asks you)
• If your interviewer provides comments or feedback, it is a good idea to incorporate
this into your approach (but don’t need to redraft your framework)
• It is good idea to set the initial framework slide paper somewhere off to the side
where you can refer back to it throughout the case
• Once you’ve presented the framework and checked it with your interviewer, it is good
to show initiative by picking where you want to start (ideally, it will be the first area in
your framework)
• Consulting skills highlighted: structured communication and general communication
skills, taking feedback, taking initiative
Driving the case – 4:22 • This section of the case (i.e. everything after presenting the framework and before
presenting the conclusion) is case‐specific. However, some best practices are
highlighted and time‐stamped where applicable
• “Give first then ask”: sometimes you want to get more information from the interviewer.
Instead of just asking for specific data‐points, lay out your approach to a particular
problem then ask for specific pieces of information
24
Section &
Comments
Timestamp
Public math / case math – • Don’t sit in silence while you do your calculations. Instead, talk through your steps
5:40 (unless something is trivially easy). Your interviewer will most likely help you if you
make a mistake!
• Consulting skills highlighted: structured communication, analytical skills,
making reasonable estimates, rounding
Clarify level of detail – • Case interviews are often pretty high level – in a ~20 minute interview you can’t go
11:45 into full detail on everything. If you identify some analysis that you think may be too
much detail, ask the interviewer before wasting valuable time. This also highlights
your thinking without actually having to go through it.
• Consulting skills highlighted: asking the right questions, driving to a solution
Make smart assumptions • In this case, the interviewee is valuing the business using the “Perpetuity Growth
– 13:00 Method”, where Value = Cashflow / (Discount Rate ‐ Growth Rate). Given the
interviewer told him that the growth rate was 3%, assuming the business’s discount
rate / cost of capital is 13% simplifies his math substantially
• Consulting skills highlighted: comfort with numbers
Take the hint – 16:20 • Your interviewer may drop you a hint when they are looking for more information or
insights. Detect this and respond accordingly
• Consulting skills highlighted: people skills / reading the situation
25
Section &
Comments
Comments
Timestamp
Conclusion – 17:10 • When you have enough information and feel reasonably confident you have gone
through the entire case, offer to present your conclusion. Try to have it be “answer
first” – based on what you did, lead with the answer. Then backup with data, and
conclude with areas for follow up (hint – this is a good place to highlight creativity)
• As a very rough rule of thumb, target ~45 seconds for the conclusion. You want this
crisp and punchy, but don’t skip crucial facts just to shorten it
• Consulting skills highlighted: structured communication, problem solving, big‐picture
thinking
Highlight your personality • Remember that consulting is a client services business, and that you will be the
(appropriately) – 18:10 product. Where appropriate, humor can be an effective way to put both you and the
interviewer at ease. However, if you are unsure if something is appropriate, don’t say
it.
• Consulting skills highlighted: “team” skills, building rapport
26
Example case: what was good about this case?
1 2 3
Getting started Running the case Wrapping it up
• Use of paper • Structured • Answer the

• Receiving the thinking & question
prompt communication • Short and sweet
• Framework • Driving the case
design and • Public math
presentation • Receiving
feedback
• Comfortable &
conversational
27
Example case: why was the framework good?
1 2 3
Determine
Determine value Go / no go
profitability
Revenue DCF analysis Fair price
• Price
• Volume Comparable Ability to execute
analysis
Cost Opportunity cost
• Fixed costs
• Variable costs
Moderately MECE
Coherent structure On topic and
(mutually exclusive,
(reason for the order) appropriate depth
collectively exhaustive)
28
There are resources available to you to help with case prep
4) Firms often offer to do a mock

The best case partner is interview with people they select to
someone who gives you high interview – take them up on their
offer and treat it as a dress rehearsal
value cases with actionable 4
critical feedback Firm mock
interviews
Who to 3
Peer
practice Advisors 3) They’re here to help and
2
with? Former they’ve been in your shoes!
consultant 2) Very valuable and typically under‐utilized
1 classmates
Fellow
1) Can be valuable, but don’t over index here as it can be
pre-consultants a little bit of the “blind leading the blind”
• School case books (HCC Website)

Where • Firm websites
to get • Prep books (Crack the Case, Case in Point, Victor Cheng)
cases? • Make your own mini‐cases or case parts (“what is Café Strada’s daily
revenue?”) –> great for framework drills
29
Case prep: relationship of practice and performance
3 Final case prep is about polish,

eliminating variability, and making
sure you are comfortable during the
actual interviews
Performance
2 Later cases are about seeing more variety

of cases, developing your own approach to
cases, and honing specific skills
Make sure you are practicing

effectively for your stage of
1 Early case practice is about learning the
practice; you should focus on
mechanics, developing basic skills, and seeing
the most common case types
different skills as you progress
Quality Cases Done
30
Case prep: common issues illustrated
• Some people get started late and don’t have

time to get past the basics
Performance
Not • Be sure to give yourself enough time to
enough prepare
case prep
Cases
• Some people have invested a lot in case prep

but leave off the final polish
Performance
• They know cases cold but sometimes nerves

Missing the
get them in the actual interview
final polish • Practice enough so that you won’t get
nervous; the final stage reduces variability in
your performance
Cases
• Some people do a ton of cases – but do low

value cases (i.e. aren’t focused on learning /
Performance
incremental improvement at each stage of

Flatlining prep)
• They often flat line after a while, with limited
incremental improvement per case
• Don’t just practice; practice consciously, with
Cases
specific goals in mind
31
Read this slide
Case prep: how to practice carefully!
Case
skill = Number of cases
* Average improvement / learning per case
Have a structured approach Have a structured approach

• Set a goal for the number of • Use a case log to keep track of which cases you do, your
cases you will do and by performance level, and areas for improvement
when • Seek out high‐value case interviewers
• Block off time for case • Seek to give cases as well – you learn a lot by seeing things from an
practice early – time interviewers perspective
disappears later in the • Keep a case / framework journal to remember interesting
semester approaches to problems
Depth Get the most from every case

• Some case types (like • Before: Setup enough time to do the case well and get good
market sizing and feedback (i.e. no less than 45 min total)
profitability) are seen over • Before: Be aware of what your top areas for improvement are so
and over again. Know these you can focus on them during the case
cold • After: Always redo and represent your framework and your
conclusion to your interviewer, even if it was pretty good the first
Breadth time. You will need to show these components in most cases so you
• See a large variety of case need to get really good at each
types to develop your • After: Log the feedback you get and record your framework you
pattern recognition came up with (if it is interesting)
Always remember what you are solving for

• You don't get "credit" for doing more cases if they don't help you;
you need to always ask "am I getting better in the areas the firms
will be evaluating me on?”
• Focus on “deliberate practice” with specific sub‐goals in mind
32
Case prep: use a case log to keep track of your feedback
Why use a case log?
• Helps you keep track of your performance over time

• Helps you identify focus areas later (“wow, my conclusions have been weak – let ’s focus there”)
• Helps you track what case types you do so you can get breadth
Example Excel‐based case log
33
Case prep: use a framework journal to remember good ideas
• You are going to come up with good ideas when you do (or give) practice cases – a journal
helps you remember what worked well, and more importantly, why it worked well
• A little thinking and cleaning up after doing a case helps you learn more overall
• Also a good repository for other related concepts – can just paste screenshots from lecture slides
and other sources into a file
Miscellaneous Framework Roadmaps

Turnaround Launch Biz Profitability Profitability vs. Competition
Go / No Go Variant
• What wasn’t Op ons Econ / Market Financial Differences

working (i.e. • Yes (sub op ons) • Econ Trends • ∏=R‐C
symptoms) • No (sub op ons) • Size • R = # * Price
• Growth • # (Mix)
• Why wasn’t it
Criteria • Segments • C = F + V + Other
working (i.e.
• Startup Costs • V (# * V%)
issues)
• Profit when Opera onal • Other = K + Taxes
Opera onal • Revenue
• How to fix it (i.e.
• Evalua on Criteria • Costs Opera onal Differences
solu ons)
(DCF, Payback, • Revenue Related
capital constraints) Non‐Opera onal • Market Segments
• K‐Structure • Sales / Marke ng
• Pricing
• Expenses
• Cost of Doing Business
• Opera onal Efficiency
• Cost of Capital
• Tax rate
34
Frameworks: the “framework game” is a way to practice coming up
with frameworks quickly and efficiently
1 • Any topic (not exclusively business)

Pick a question • Newspapers, politics, classes, etc.
2 • Give yourself time limits (20‐60 sec)

Devise & present a • Go through the presentation process and
framework keep to ~30‐60 seconds Can be done
alone,
better with
3 • What’s it missing? a partner
Evaluate framework • Where is it not tight?
• How can it be better?
4 • Doing it over again reinforces “proper

Redesign & behavior ”
represent
35
Frameworks: example “framework game” prompts
Try making a MECE framework to approach the following questions

1) Your classmate Julie doesn’t know how to approach her career search. Build Julie a framework that
will help her decide which career paths she should pursue.
2) Your are deciding where to eat for dinner Saturday night. How should you think about this?
3) Your client, a Singapore‐based private equity firm, recently acquired a Vietnamese shoe
manufacturer (“ShoeCo”). ShoeCo has experienced declining profitability over the past several
years. Your client would like to know what has driven the decline in profitability and what can be
done to address it.
4) Your client, a US‐based apparel company, has experienced slowing revenue domestic growth and
wants to know how to combat this trend. How should your client think about increasing revenue?
5) Your client, a Japan‐based automaker, has recently experienced a sharp decrease in profitability.
Management thinks it has a good handle on how to increase revenues and wants you to focus on
costs. What is your plan?
6) Your client, a US drug store chain, has seen a sharp decline in profit margin over the past two years.
What is going wrong and what would you advise they do?
7) Your client, a global hard‐disk drive manufacturer, is evaluating acquiring a competitor and would
like your recommendation on how to proceed. How should they look at this?
8) Your friend has just invented an everlasting car battery. She is a brilliant scientist but doesn’t know
the first thing about business. How much is this idea worth and what should she do?
36
Frameworks: you can make frameworks more sophisticated by
highlighting order and the question
Buckets Profit Value Buy
1 2 3
Order Profit Value Buy
Sophistication
1 Determine 2 Determine 3 Decide

Profitability Value go / no go
Task
or
Question
1 Is Co. 2 How much 3 Should
Profitable? is it worth? Carlos buy?
37
Frameworks: one good way to present a framework is to first go
across, then go down
1 • Paraphrase, don’t repeat

Restate question
2
• “I’d like to approach this in
Show structure three ways…”
3
• “To assess profitability, I’d
Show depth like to focus on…”
4
• “I’d like to begin by
Pick starting place addressing revenue”
38
Math: a few thoughts on case math
• Your goal is to show that you can reason with numbers and can
communicate effectively with them
Your goal • Don’t need to be a math genius, do need to be numerate
• Vast majority of cases involve numbers to some degree
• Don’t show thinking

Common • Don’t approximate / use units
mistakes • Take too long
1 2 3
Lay out your Walk through your Sanity check
A good approach steps the results
approach to • Use paper • Use paper (unless • Does the answer
calculations • Make sure you are calcs are very easy) make sense?
speaking
1 2 3
Approximations Math tricks Structure data
A few good
• Use round numbers • Easy to manipulate 10s • Put large lists of
math tips • Use approx. calcs and halves numbers into tables
• Use scientific
notation! Losing
zeros is the most
common math
mistake. 39
Math: quick review of the income statement
IS Item Margin Drivers

Sales NA Volume, price, mix (product,
geography, etc.)
Less Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) COGS Margin Cost to produce
(raw goods, labor, etc.)
= Gross Profit Gross Margin All of the above
Less Operating Expenses (OpEx) OpEx Margin Cost to operate business

(sales, G&A, etc.)
= Operating Profit Operating Margin All of the above
Less Non‐Operating Expense Non‐Operating Expense Margin Other items (interest income,
[Rarely seen] interest expense, etc.)
= Pre‐Tax Income Pre‐Tax Margin All of the above
Taxes Tax Rate (Taxes / Pre‐Tax Income) Tax rates
= Net Income Profit Margin All of the above
40
Math: some math drills
1) Estimate the number of men age 40‐49 in the US that have prostate cancer assuming:
‐ 309M people in US
‐ Life span of ~80 years w/ even distribution across that span
‐ 150 / 100K incidence rate in men 40‐49 years of age
2) Calculate total company net income given the following information:

‐ Hair dressing segment has revenue of $502M and GM of 29.2%
‐ Enterprise software segment has revenue of $1.05B and GM of 71.4%
‐ Auto segment has revenue of $2.98B and Gross margin of 18.9%
‐ Corporate overhead of 3% of total sales
‐ Tax‐rate of 35% of pre‐tax income
3) Calculate auto manufacturer segment profit given the following:
Company Segment Sales Margin
Company A Auto Man $4.9B 5%
Company B Supplier $2.7B 10%
Company C Auto Man $6.1B 6%
Company D Supplier $3.3B 11%
Company E Auto Man $3.0B 4%
41
Presentation: A few thoughts on communicating and presenting
• Can this person communicate in a structured, well organized fashion?

Interviewer ’s
• Will this person work well within a case team?
internal • Can we put this person in front of a client?
monologue
• Professionalism • Body language

Areas to • Response to feedback • Eye contact
focus on • Communication skills
Presenting your Presenting your Remember that these

framework conclusion areas (like all parts of
the case) are about
• Good timing? • Get to the point?
Areas to • Reasonable flow? • Support with data?
both Content and
• A good approach is: Presentation. Evaluate
highlight
1)answer question yourself on both these
within a case 2)support w/ dimensions. Get really
evidence good at presenting
3)follow up / next frameworks and
step conclusions
42
Giving cases: some pointers
Give real feedback

1 Focus on learning, not
• Your partner needs to
following the case
improve – tell them
“script ” – OK to deviate
where you think they
should focus
• You aren’t helping
anyone by holding back Tips for
valuable feedback giving 2 Let them flail, then push
on track; you want to
cases strike the balance
Learn from others between being too
directive and too hands
• What looks good that off
you aren’t doing?
• What looks bad that you 3 When in doubt on what
are doing? feedback to give, focus on
• What innovative intro (framework) and
frameworks / conclusion; these high value
approaches are there? sections appear in every case
interview and so are worth
focusing on
43
Outline

4) Practice cases
44
Five steps to behavioral preparation
• Knowing what you know about what the firms are

1 Identify questions / topics looking for, what questions might they ask?
• Generally a reasonable list of “core questions”
with unlimited variants
• Knowing what you know about what the firms are
2 Identify your best stories looking for, what experiences of yours are
relevant?
• Good to have redundancy (e.g. questions 1‐3 may

3 Match stories to questions all be answerable by story A) as well as flexibility
to help when you get “oddball” questions
4 Bullet out answers • PAR is good simple format

• Shoot for the majority of your response to be on
(PAR = Problem, Action, Result)
the Action ( > ~60%)
• Most people spend too long on the Problem
5 Perform and REPEAT • You get more out of doing one question four times
than four questions one time
• Repetition is key; whether working with a partner
or in front of a mirror, make sure to harness the
power of repetition
45
You can tailor one story to answer multiple experience questions
Typical questions in consulting interviews (NOT EXHAUSTIVE)
Introduction Leadership
• Tell me about yourself • Tell me about a time you had to lead a team /
• Walk me through your resume lead without authority
Fit Personal impact & achievement

• Why are you interested in consulting? • Tell me about a time you made a significant
• Why are you interested in this firm? impact
• What are your career goals? • What achievement are you most proud of?
Strengths / weaknesses Persuasion & conflict

• What are your top strengths / weaknesses? • Tell me about a time you had to persuade people
• What feedback did you receive at your last under challenging circumstances
performance appraisal? • Tell me about a time when you handled conflict at
work
Problem solving
• Tell me about a time when you faced a very Failure
complex problem • Tell me about a time you failed
B‐school essays and interview prep are a good place to start – you’ve probably come up
with some of these stories before
46
Behavioral Prep: use a “PAR Matrix” to help with behavioral answers
Why use a PAR Matrix?

• Helps you make sure you have covered all of the relevant question types
• Forces you to think through your “portfolio” of stories and judge which are the best
• Gets you thinking about how to deliver each story in a structured, thoughtful way
Example PAR Matrix

Relevant question
Story Title Problem Action Result
types
Big assignment in ‐ Leadership Local team didn’t ‐Listened to concerns ‐Earned credibility
international office ‐ Personal Impact trust the visitor from ‐ Met people halfway with local team and
corporate HQ ‐Championed the built lasting
solution friendships
‐Delivered HQ
solution on time and
under budget
Failure in ‐ Failure story … … …

communication
Non‐profit turnaround ‐ Leadership … … …

‐ Problem‐solving
47
Additional Behavioral Questions: NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST
1. Walk me through your resume. 12. What is your leadership style? 22. Why do you want to be in this city?
2. Why should we hire you? 13. How has your leadership style What ties do you have to the area?
3. Why [this firm]? changed over the course of your 23. Why this firm over your current firm?
career? Why didn’t you apply directly rather
4. Where else are you applying? than going through the trouble of
14. Why consulting?
5. Where else do you already have an getting an MBA?
offer? 15. You’ve obviously been successful in
[your prior career], why change now? 24. Tell me about a time when you were
6. What would your friends and asked to lead a group in a subject
colleagues say your greatest strengths 16. You’re going to be older than many matter you were not comfortable
and weaknesses are? people in this role. Is that a problem with.
for you?
7. Describe a situation when you failed. 25. What feedback did you receive in
What did you learn from the 17. What skills do you have that you think your last performance review?
experience? will translate well into consulting?
26. Tell me about a time when you had to
8. Tell me about a time when you led a 18. How do you expect your prior persuade people under challenging
team through adversity. Thanks...tell experience to help you in your career circumstances.
me about another time. at [this firm]?
27. Tell me about a time when you had to
9. Tell me about a project that didn’t go 19. Tell me about a time when there was handle conflict at work
well. What would you have done a difficult personality on a team you
led. How did you manage the 28. Tell me about a time when you had to
differently? lead a team without authority
situation?
10. Can you describe your personal 29. What achievement are you most
brand? 20. Where do you see yourself
professionally in 5 years...in 10 years? proud of?
11. Tell me about a time when you were 30. Tell me about a time you had a big
truly challenged. What did you learn? 21. What steps have you taken to prepare
yourself for the quantitative rigor of impact.
this job? [if no quant in background]
48
Outline

4) Practice cases
49
Table of contents
Pg # Cases Format Topic Industry Concepts tested
5 Berry Chill Partner Growth Consumer Retail  Growth strategy, Product development
2
59 ComfortFoam Interviewee‐ driven Competitive Manufacturing  Profitability, market segmentation, market sizing
Strategy (consumer)
67 CoffeeCo Interviewer‐ driven Profitability Restaurant  Market analysis, financial analysis
79 LifeRenew Interviewee‐ driven Market BioPharma  Market sizing, customer segmentation, pricing
Entry
88 Steel Corp Interviewee‐ driven Growth Industrial (Steel)  Growth strategy
95 FlyMe.com Interviewer‐ driven Profitability Travel / e‐  Financial analysis, Increasing sales

commerce
106 MexTell Interviewee‐ driven M&A Telecom  Financial analysis
113 SunFury Interviewer‐ driven Market Energy (Solar)  Market sizing, Financial analysis
Entry
122 Camilla’s Pets Interviewee‐ driven Operations Consumer Retail  Profitability
131 Hrdwr2Softwr Interviewer‐ driven Growth Tech (Hardware)  Market analysis, Financial analysis
141 AlphaAuto Interviewee‐ driven Market Entry Auto  Market analysis
157 Jamaican Land Interviewee‐ driven Profitability Agriculture  Profitability, Financial analysis
164 Avicenna Health Interviewee‐ driven Market Entry Healthcare  Market analysis
171 Down Under Interviewer‐ driven Growth Retail  Company analysis, Increasing revenue
185 Otobea Interviewer‐driven Market Entry Consumer Retail  Growth strategy, financial analysis
50
Guide to the Interviewer
 Included on the first page of

every case Interviewer Guide Level of Difficulty
 Keep these in mind as you go
through the case to keep the  Keys to the case: the two or
 Single issue case question
interviewee on track three main points that need to
be covered to crack the case
1  Focus on qualitative, not
quantitative solutions
 Included throughout case
 These are for tips for the
v
interviewer on how to move
 Basic case problems
the case along  Tips: hints for you to use to 2  Exhibit analysis introduced
 Quantitative analysis required,
guide interviewee
but no active number crunching
 Included on the exhibit
analysis pages v V
 Additional complexity introduced
 Use these questions to
initiate and guide the  Intro and questions to ask: 3  Basic number crunching
(addition, multiplication) required
candidates' thinking suggested questions to direct for quantitative part of solution
interviewee exhibit analysis
 Included throughout case  Multiple exhibits and stages to
 General guidelines to 4 determine final solution

 Quantitative aspect of solution is
evaluate candidates as they
v the case
progress through  Good candidate vs. Better most important
Candidate: identifies the
 Push better candidates with  Most complex problems with
differentiating characteristics
more complex factors or
questions of interviewee performance 5 several stages to find solution
 Highly quantitative in nature
51
Case 1: Berry Chill Frozen Yogurt
Behavioral Pre‐Case Questions Case Overview

 Describe a failure and what you learned from it? Format: Partner case
 Can you give me an example of a project that didn’t go as well as you had hoped Difficulty level: 1/5
and tell me what you have learned from the experience? Topic: Growth
Industry: Retail (Consumer)
 Concept(s) tested:
− Growth strategy
Case Question
− Product development
Our client, Berry Chill Frozen Yogurt, is the industry ’s best quality frozen yogurt
made from real California milk and served with a wide array of flavors and
toppings. Founded in 2006, the young yogurt chain is popular partly due to its self
serve format and because it is relatively inexpensive compared to other yogurt Interviewer Guide
businesses such as Pinkberry. Over the past two years, the company has opened
an average of 10 stores per year (currently has 25 stores) and increased revenue by  NOTE: Case takes place in 2008
an annual CAGR of 35%.  Keys to the case
− Candidate suggests and tests
several strategies to growth
The CEO of Berry Chill has come to us to identify how to increase its current
− Creativity of solutions
growth path. − Candidate proposes a short‐ and
long‐term growth strategy
 Differentiation: creativity of
solutions, while maintaining
structure
INTERVIEWER ONLY
52
All critical information is provided below – any additional information Interviewer Guide
requested can be made up or explicitly stated as irrelevant
Tips
Additional Facts (provide if asked) − This is an open‐style case: goal is
to push candidate to make
assumptions and come up with
 Company‐specific: creative solutions
− One of the first in the self‐serve frozen yogurt market
− Push candidate to focus on
− Develops own proprietary flavors; toppings are generic
revenue growth
− Currently own and operate all 25 stores in Southern California
− Currently only sells yogurt on a per ounce basis − Feel free to describe the general
operations of a self serve frozen
 Frozen yogurt market
yogurt store
− Frozen yogurt is seen as a healthier alternative to ice cream and other desserts
 Good candidate:
− Self serve style stores are gaining popularity relative to traditional full‐service stores
− Asks general questions regarding
− Major costs are fixed – variable cost is essentially yogurt and toppings client
 Competition − Asks general questions regarding
− In the last year, a few competitors have begun to enter the Southern California market industry
− Does not focus on costs
 Better candidate:
− Understands that business
has economies of scale
− Asks if the company has
considered franchising
NEXT STEP: Framework
evaluation
INTERVIEWER ONLY
53
Potential Framework How to help BC Fro‐Yo grow?
w/in current stores physical expansion how to enact new ideas
New Criteria for Other store

Pricing types Franchise Partnerships
Products new BCs
Self‐
Non‐ New Entirely Similar financing
Food Increase Demographics Geographies
food scheme different customers
retail
stores Bank Offer
Cookies Apparel debt equity
Families, Mid/High Warm Coffee
Cups,
kids income weather Int’l shops
Sub shop
Coffee etc.,
Interviewer Guide
 Intro: “Why don’t you go ahead and walk me through your  Good candidate
framework” − Presents non‐canned framework in a structured manner
− Able to talk through thought process while developing
 Keys to section: framework
− Focus on top‐line growth – do not address costs at this point  Better candidate
− Identifies growth opportunities from current and new stores − Unveiling hypotheses along the way and not afraid to
 NEXT STEP: Prioritizing growth opportunities disregard some of these
− Thinks about “how” these will be brought to market
INTERVIEWER ONLY
54
Potential framework for analyzing potential growth opportunities

Potential Level of Potential Timing Risk Go or No Go
Strategies difficulty Magnitude (Short – (Low – (Why)
Interviewer Guide
(Low – (Small – Long) High)
High) Large)  Intro: “How would you
evaluate these potential
growth strategies you
Increase price Low Med – Short‐term Low Yes proposed in your framework?”
a few cents Large (low impact to
per ounce overall cost to  Follow‐up questions to ask:
customer) Which criteria is the most important
for our client to consider?
(Magnitude)
Adopt High Large Med‐ to Low Yes  Good candidate:
franchisee long term (fast growth oppty, − Develops a structured approach to
model for BC highly scalable,
store deters comp. from evaluating strategies
expansion entering markets) − Identifies some criteria related to
difficulty of execution and
Offer new Low Med – Short term Med – High Yes (very magnitude
food products Large low risk,  Better candidate:
through ability to bundle − Able to walk through thought‐
bundling easily, high margin)
process while evaluating ideas
− Identifies timing and risk as
additional criteria
 NEXT STEP: WRAP‐UP
INTERVIEWER ONLY
55
Case 1: Berry Chill Frozen Yogurt: Conclusion (2 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
• Short‐term: increase price per ounce and begin offering additional food items (cookies,
coffee, etc.,) with yogurt
• Medium‐ to long‐term: adopt franchising model to expand within So Cal and in
other warm weather geographies
Reasons to Support Recommendation

 Short‐term immediate impact to bottom line w/low risk
− Price increase: a $0.05 increase on a 10oz order is $0.50/customer ‐> with 400 customers/day ‐> to $200/day ‐> x 365 days/year
‐> additional $73,000 in profit (no additional variable cost)
− Additional food items:: minimal additional marginal cost leads to high potential margins; can bundle
 Franchise model allows for fast, highly scalable approach to expansion w/low risk to overall company
Notes
 Risks: potential cannibalization of current stores, too rapid expansion outpacing demand, loose franchise
monitoring may harm brand and reputation
 Next steps: determine approach steps to initiate franchise model
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Feedback form next

56
Case Feedback Form Name of Case: Case Book:
Behavioral answer ___:___ min Date:

Framework development ___:___ min Case Giver:
Framework explanation ___:___ min
TOTAL Case Time ___:___ min
Behavioral Impactful & well‐communicated
Clarifying questions (if needed)

Initial
Relevant framework
Structure
Explanation and hypothesis
High‐level summary of exhibits

Stating approach  solving 
Analysis
so what
Quantitative accuracy & comfort
Answer first
Closing Structured recap of findings
What’s next
Business intuition & creativity

Structured & clear thinking
Consulting
DNA Comfort with ambiguity
Engaging style
57
Feedback Criteria Key: Definitions of “strong” ratings
Impactful & well‐communicated: begins with a one‐sentence introduction that captures attention. Showcases behaviors/skills
Behavioral relevant to the prompt. Story is easy to follow as the actions/decisions progress. Includes the elements of Problem‐Action‐Result or
Situation‐Task‐Action‐Results/Reflect.
Clarifying questions: Only asks questions clearly relevant to the problem that has been presented. Does not try to solve case by asking
questions that go beyond clarifying.
Initial
Relevant framework: Address the correct problem. Is MECE, showing interdependencies were relevant. Well‐structured/easy to read.
Structure
Explanation and hypothesis: Summarizes primary “buckets” before diving into details. Includes case specific information, like “room
bookings and event space rentals” for a hotel, instead of “revenue.” Drives towards a relevant place to start asking for data.
High‐level summary of exhibits: Focuses on most important take‐aways before diving into math. Asks questions where needed.
Connect to previously provided/solved info, where relevant.
Stating approach  solving  so what: Proactively lays out structure (formula or steps) before diving in. Drives towards answers, and
Analysis
then interprets answers for impact on overall case conclusion or next steps.
Quantitative accuracy & comfort: Arrives at correct or appropriately estimated answers. ”Sanity checks” in order to verify orders of
magnitude or solve for the same number a second way.
Answer first: Gives the “punch line” first, directly addressing the principal question of the case. This shows ability to communicate
effectively with C‐level clients and firm partners.
Closing Structured recap of findings: Reviews “what we’ve learned,” referring only to the most important info for a C‐level client to know.
What’s next: Goes beyond the prompt to provide appropriate recommendations on risks, contingencies and next steps in order for the
client to solve their problem.
Business intuition & creativity: Pulls on personal experience or recent news. Asks appropriate questions about the business model.
Goes “beyond the book,” is not a “case robot” but rather can provide new ideas and be flexible when put on the spot.
Consulting Structured & clear thinking: Clearly shows and explains logical steps towards conclusions, uses paper to create structure around
DNA conversation. Speaks at an appropriate pace and volume.
Comfort with ambiguity: Handles missteps with grace, takes pauses to collect thoughts when needed, reacts well to surprises.
Engaging style: Brings the case‐giver along in multi‐step processes, maintains good eye contact, shows interest in the case content.
58
Case 2: ComfortFoam

 Tell me about a time when you worked on a team that faced a particular ・
Format: Interviewee‐driven
challenge. Please focus on the role you played in this process. ・
Difficulty level: 3/5
 What are your long‐term career goals and how do you see the time you spend ・
Topic: Competitive strategy
at “X” firm helping you achieve these goals. ・Industry: Manufacturing
(Consumer)
Case Question  Concept(s) tested:
− Profitability
Our client, ComfortFoam manufactures, markets and distributes, mattresses, − Market segmentation
− Market sizing
pillows and other bedding products. In the past three years, the company has
experienced declining profits and has asked your team to (1) determine what is
causing profits to decline, (2) identify potential opportunities to increase overall Interviewer Guide
company profitability.
 Keys to the case
− Competition is stealing share in
premium mattress segment
− Client must take share back from
competition due to low industry
growth
− Develop creative ideas to increase
profitability
 Differentiation: quality and
structure of revised strategy
INTERVIEWER ONLY
59
Case 2: ComfortFoam
Good candidate:
Additional Facts (provide if asked)  Asks general questions regarding
client
 Company‐specific:  Asks general questions regarding
industry
• Manufactures, markets, and distributes primarily mattresses
• Publicly traded with $1.7 billion in annual revenues (20% market share); 12% EBITDA  Understands profit is a function of
margin revenue and costs
• Products: primarily produces foam‐based mattress (non‐innersprings) and pillows  Better candidate:
• Competes in premium market mattresses (>$1,000), pillows, and other bedding  Asks questions about changes in
• Costs are on‐par with industry averages
client ’s situation
 U.S. mattress market  Asks questions about changes in
• Exhibit 1 (give this to interviewee during next phase of case when asked for it) – will show industry environment
historical size, growth, and 1 and 3‐year forecasts  Asks questions specifically about
• Retail pricing: retailers typically add a mark‐up of 20%‐30% to final retail price competitor actions
 Competition NEXT STEP: MOVE TO NEXT
• Exhibit 1 – will show segmentation of market PHASE
• Some new and existing companies have recently introduced new products and
technologies target at premium mattress market
INTERVIEWER ONLY
60
Case 2: ComfortFoam
Exhibit 1: U.S. Mattress Market
8,500 3% growth 8,751
Company Market Revenue EBITDA EBITDA Market Price‐to‐
All other All other
Share Growth Margin Value EBITDA
Competitor 5 Competitor 5 Competitor 5 11% 9% 18% $170 $2,074 12.2
Competitor 4 Competitor 4 Competitor 4 14% 2% 8% $99 $755 7.6
Competitor 3 Competitor 3 Competitor 3 13% ‐2% ‐2% ‐$25 $108 N/A

ComfortFoam 20% ‐2% 12% $210 $1,869 8.9
Client Client
2011 2012e
Interviewer Guide Key Observations from Data

 Intro: “Here is data we have on the U.S. mattress market”  Client‐specific
 Questions to ask:  Largest share of market
 Identify key observations from data (examples to right)  Revenue expected to decline and result in loss of market share
 What do you notice about our client, ComfortFoam?  Average profitability and p/EBITDA rating
 What do you notice about the overall market? Any particular firms  Overall market
standout?  Top 6 own ~80% of the market
 Keys to section:  Relatively low growth overall
− Identify client and overall market specific issues
 Profitability varies widely (from ‐2% to 19% EBITDA Margin)
− Identify EBITDA and revenue growth as value drivers
 EBITDA drives Market Value (P/EBITDA varies from 1.8 to 14.6)
 NEXT STEP: Growth opportunities  Competitors 2 and 5 are rising stars
INTERVIEWER ONLY
61
Case 2: ComfortFoam: Handout
Exhibit 1: 2011 U.S. Mattress Market

(values in millions)
3% growth 8,751
8,500
All other
All other
Company Revenue EBITDA Market

Competitor 5 Competitor 5
Value
Competitor 4 Competitor 4 Competitor 5 $925 $170 $1,210
Competitor 4 $1,210 $99 $1,200
Competitor 3 $1,072 ‐$25 $57
Competitor 2 Competitor 2 Competitor 2 $675 $125 $1,825

Competitor 1 $1,300 $127 $230
ComfortFoam $1,708 $210 $1,875
Client Client
2011 Revenue Expected 2012

Revenue
62
Case 2: ComfortFoam
Potential framework for analyzing potential strategies

Potential Level of Potential Timing Risk Interviewer Guide
Strategies difficulty Magnitude (Short – Long) (Low – High)
(Low – High) (Small – Large)  Intro: “What are some of the
things our client can do to
Increase Low Small – Med Short‐term Medium address these competitive
price issues?”
 Questions to ask:
 How would you evaluate these
potential options?
Invest in R&D High Medium Long‐term High  What criteria can you use to
evaluate these potential options?
 Which criteria is the most
important for our client to
consider? (Magnitude)
Invest in Medium Med – Large Mid‐ to Long‐ High
direct to  Keys to section:
term − Develop a structured approach to
consumer
generate and evaluate potential
channels strategic options
Acquire Medium Large Mid‐ to Med – High  NEXT STEP: WRAP‐UP
competitor Long‐term
INTERVIEWER ONLY
63
Case 2: ComfortFoam: Conclusion (2 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
There is no correct answer for this case. Potential answers include: (1) acquiring a smaller
growing company, (2) investing in R&D, or developing a retail chain to increase margin

 Have to address how the recommendation will address the following issues:
− Decline in revenue growth
− Decrease in profitability
Notes
 Candidate must identify potential risks , test the plausibility of key assumptions, and critical analyses that will
help address these risks and next steps

64


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
65
Initial
Structure
Analysis
66
Case 3: CoffeeCo

Format: Interviewer‐driven
 Walk me through your resume. Difficulty level: 4/5
 Why do you want to work for Firm X? Topic: Profitability
Industry: Restaurant
− Market analysis
Case Question − Financial analysis
− Increasing sales
Your client is a small Berkeley‐based café chain called CoffeeCo. CoffeeCo has four − Decreasing costs
café locations in and around the UC Berkeley campus. CoffeeCo has been  Length: Long (~30 min)
experiencing declining profit margins over the past several years. The owner of the
store wants to know why this is happening and what they can do about it. The Interviewer Guide
chain has invested a lot in store expansions, opening one new store in each of the  Keys to the case
past two years. − Quickly realizing that profit
decrease is not due to changes in
the broader market
− Reading “between the lines” in
the financial info to determine
that new stores are
underperforming
− Quickly coming to correct solution
for Revenue and OpEx issue
− Being very quick on the uptake
INTERVIEWER ONLY
67
Case 3: CoffeeCo
Example Framework A
How to Fix CoffeeCo Profit %?
Market: are external forces Financial: Where is CoffeeCo Solution: given first two areas,
causing Profit to decrease? seeing the impact financially pinpoint what actions need to
Supply Demand Revenue Costs be taken
Com Non‐
Substit COGS Opex
petiti # cust $/ Cust Mix Price Volume Operating
utes
on Expenses
Example Framework B
Market: are external forces
causing Profit to decrease?
‐Supply (Competition,
Substitutes)
‐ Demand (# cust, $ / cust) Solution: given preceding
Assess Co. Financials areas, pinpoint what actions
need to be taken to resolve
‐ Revenue (Mix, Price, Volume
‐ Costs (FC, VC) Operational: what internal
forces are driving issues
Choose one or both

depending on financials
INTERVIEWER ONLY
68
Case 3: CoffeeCo
Market Analysis: Regardless of where the interviewee wants to start, Interviewer Guide
push them to explore if market forces impacted profitability
 Answer: The market has not changed
and market forces are not driving
Case Facts (provide if asked) CoffeeCo’s decrease in profitability.
 Market Demand:  Note: This section does not require a

full “market sizing”, only a high‐level
 Customers: if asked by interviewee, ask them to estimate which demographics understanding that the market has
are going to not materially changed in the past
be customers. Once they do, tell them since the locations are on or around campus, the several years
customers are 80% students and 20% faculty / staff
 Good candidate:
 Population: if asked by interviewee, ask them to estimate how the population has changed  Gets to the right answer with a
over the past several years. Once they do, let them know that the population has been little bit of guidance
roughly flat
 Spend per Customer / Usage trends: if asked by interviewee, ask them to estimate how  Better candidate:
Café usage trends have changed over over the past several years. Once they do, let them  Gets to the right answer with
know that the the store owner says spend per customer has been roughly flat essentially no guidance
 Market Supply  Presents a structured approach to
the market analysis before diving
 Competition: If asked by interviewee, ask them to estimate if they think competition has in
materially changed over past several years. Once they do, let them know that the Café  Knows when they have received
market near UC Berkeley has always been competitive but has not become more so over enough information to move on
past several years from market analysis w/o
 Substitutes: no major replacements for Coffee / Cafés have emerged in the Berkeley mkt prompting
 Client
• NEXT STEP: Hand the interviewee the
 Product mix: sells two products: Coffee and Sandwiches Financials exhibit and ask them to
 Store location: two original stores are adjacent to campus (both on Bancroft) and two new analyze
stores are on campus (one at Haas, one at Law School)
INTERVIEWER ONLY
69
Case 3: CoffeeCo
Exhibit: Selected CoffeeCo Income Statement Items
Total Per‐Store Averages New vs. Old Stores in 2012
(assuming old stores stayed at
2010 level)
2010 2011 2012 2010 2012 Old Stores New Stores
Revenue (y/y growth) $1,000 $1,400 (40%) $1,800 (29%) $500 $450 $500 $400
COGS (Margin) $500 (50%) $700 (50%) $900 (50%) $250 (50%) $225 (50%) $250 (50%) $200 (50%)
Gross Profit (Margin) $500 (50%) $700 (50%) $900 (50%) $250 (50%) $225 (50%) $250 (50%) $200 (50%)
OpEx (Margin) $200 (20%) $350 (25%) $500 (28%) $100 (20%) $125 (28%) $100 (20%) $150 (37.5%)
Operating Profit (Margin) $300 (30%) $350 (25%) $400 (22%) $150 (30%) $100 (22%) $150 (30%) $50 (12.5%)
Memo: Number of Stores 2 3 4

 Intro: “Here is the financial data the owner provided us”  Declining revenue per store (new stores contributing
 Questions to ask (if interviewee needs help):
~$100K / year less than old stores
 Should the company be concerned about its COGS?
 How do these figures look on a margin basis?  Gross Margin unchanged at 50%
 How do these figures look on a per‐store basis?  OpEx margin declining, driven by higher OpEx at new
 Info to provide (if asked): old store financial performance has stayed the stores ($150K / store at new stores vs. $100K / at old
same since 2010 stores)
 Keys to section:  The “what to do next” phase of the case needs to
− Remembers store info from prompt (and looks at Exhibit footnote) focus on revenue and OpEx at new stores
− Identifies that declining revenue per store and spiking OpEx are driving the
decrease in profit margin (and, conversely, that COGS are not driving it)  NEXT STEP: Ask interviewee to solve both Revenue
− Identify that the issue is stemming from the new stores and OpEx issue
INTERVIEWER ONLY
70
Case 3: CoffeeCo: Handout
Exhibit: Selected CoffeeCo Income Statement Items*

(values in thousands)
2010 2011 2012

Revenue $1,000 $1,400 $1,800
COGS $500 $700 $900
OpEx $200 $350 $500
* Fiscal Year Ended 12/31. All store openings occurred on Jan 1 of their corresponding fiscal year and open fully operational
71
Case 3: CoffeeCo
Revenue Solution: When interviewee gets to revenue issue, hand them Interviewer Guide
Exhibit entitled “Menu for Old Stores vs. New Stores”
 Answer: CoffeeCo’s has lower revenue at
the New Stores because it doesn’t sell
Flow of this Section sandwiches at the new stores. This, in turn,
is due to the fact that CoffeeCo wont get a
kitchen permit on campus for years. The
1) Interpreting chart: company can fix this by making pre‐made
sandwiches at it’s off‐campus locations and
 Interviewee should quickly be able to tell that all of the $100K revenue deficit is bringing‐on campus
experienced by the New Stores
 Interviewee should read footnote and notice that the New Stores are on campus, and  Good candidate:
know this is more than a coincidence. If they miss this, direct their attention to the footnote  Gets to the right answer with moderate
2) Brainstorming issues: guidance
 Ask the interviewee to brainstorm why the New Stores aren’t selling sandwiches. After  Better candidate:
they they do so, push them to think about why the on‐campus locations might not be able  Gets to the right answer with limited
to (e.g. “the store owner tells us he would like to sell sandwiches on campus but he can’t. guidance
Why might that be?”). Example brainstorm:  Presents a structured approach to
Issue due to Demand (I.e. on‐campus customers don’t want sandwiches) brainstorming
Issue due to Supply (CoffeeCo is not selling sandwiches)
 Bonus points for additional creative
‐ Chooses not to revenue solutions
‐ Can’t
+ No staff NEXT STEP: If the interviewee has done the
+ No ingredients OpEx portion, ask them to wrap up the case
+ No facilities: can’t make the sandwich because the campus wont give them a kitchen permit for years with a conclusion. Otherwise, ask them to
 The point of this section isn’t to test to see if they can guess well, but rather to see if they solve the OpEx issue
can brainstorm effectively and quickly hone in on key issue with some interviewer guidance
3) Suggest solution: CoffeeCo can fix this issue by making sandwiches off campus
and bringing on campus
INTERVIEWER ONLY
72
Exhibit: Menu for Old Stores vs. New Stores
Old Stores* New Stores*

Coffee Offered (~80% of Offered (100% of
revenue) revenue)
Sandwiches Offered (~20% of Not offered
revenue)
* Both old stores are located adjacent to campus. Both new stores are located on campus.
73
Case 3: CoffeeCo
OpEx Solution: When interviewee gets to OpEx issue, hand them Interviewer Guide
Exhibit entitled “OpEx Breakout for Old Stores vs. New Stores”
 Answer: CoffeeCo’s has higher OpEx in the
new stores due to the higher labor cost at
Flow of this Section the new stores. This is due to the fact that
the store is open too long and does not have
enough employees, causing it to pay
1) Interpreting chart: overtime. The company should explore
reducing the hours for New Stores. It should
 Interviewee should quickly be able to tell that the all of the $50K OpEx increase in the New also explore adding more employees to
Stores is due to higher labor expense in the New Stores. Interviewee will need to refer back reduce overtime.
to data from the Financials exhibit
 If interviewee needs prompting, ask them “What is the $ value of Labor Expense in the  Good candidate:
new stores vs. old stores?” (an answer: $40K Old Stores, $90K New Stores)  Gets to the right answer with moderate
guidance
2) Brainstorming issues:  Better candidate:

 Ask interviewee to break down then brainstorm the drivers of Labor expense. Example:  Gets to the right answer with limited
Labor = hours worked * effective hourly wage per hour guidance
 Info to provide when asked:  Presents a structured approach to
brainstorming
 New stores have longer hours than the old stores but experience little traffic / business during these extra periods
 Base hourly wage is the same at both stores, but the new stores have substantial overtime charges while old stores
have not NEXT STEP: If the interviewee has done the
Revenue portion, ask them to wrap up the
case with a conclusion. Otherwise, ask them
3) Suggest solution to solve the Revenue issue
INTERVIEWER ONLY
74
Exhibit: OpEx Breakout for Old Stores vs. New Stores

Presented as % of total OpEx
Old Stores* New Stores*

Overhead 30% 20%
Rent 30% 20%
Labor 40% 60%
* Both old stores are located adjacent to campus. Both new stores are located on campus.
75
Case 3: CoffeeCo: Conclusion (2 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
(GOOD) CoffeeCo’s profit margin decrease is due to its new stores, which have
$100K less revenue and $50K higher higher OpEx per store. The revenue issue stems from not being
able to sell sandwiches at its new stores due to kitchen permitting issues. The company should start
selling sandwiches it made off‐site to resolve this. The OpEx issue is due to higher labor costs at the new
stores due to unnecessarily long hours and unnecessary overtime. The company should explore reducing
its store hours and hiring more employees
(BETTER) Same as above plus: Some areas for CoffeeCo to follow up on include looking into the logistics
for making extra sandwiches off site and assessing the financial impact of reducing on‐campus store
hours

76


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
77
Initial
Structure
Analysis
78
Case 4: LifeRenew

 Tell me about a time when you worked on a team that faced a particular Format: Interviewee‐led
challenge. Please focus on the role you played in this process. Difficulty level: 5/5
 What are your long‐term career goals and how do you see the time you spend Topic: Market Entry
at “X” firm helping you achieve these goals. Industry: BioPharma
− Market sizing
Case Question
− Customer segmentation
− Pricing
Our client, LifeRenew Inc. a privately‐held biopharmaceutical company, is
developing animal blood substitutes. Blood substitutes are created using red
blood cells from other animals and are able to carry oxygen around the body and Interviewer Guide
have several characteristics that make it more attractive than the current supply  Keys to the case
channel. LifeRenew’s proprietary blood substitute for canines, Canopure, − Canopure has potential to replace
represents a brand new technology that will solve the blood availability issue for current products and also expand
use in acute blood loss and emergency trauma surgeries. LifeRenew has just the overall market (disruptive)
received third stage FDA approval to market and sell Canopure. − Target market: emergency care vet
practices, which treat the majority
of critical trauma cases
LifeRenew has asked us to determine (1) the potential penetration of Canopure − Go‐to‐market strategy must be
into the canine blood supply, (2) which customer segment to target, and (3) how consistent across target customer
segment ‐> price ‐> distribution
much to charge for it.
 Option to extend w/ section on
distribution and profitability
INTERVIEWER ONLY
79
Case 4: LifeRenew
Good candidate:
Additional Facts (provide if asked)  Ask clarifying questions about
company and/or blood substitutes
 Company‐specific:  Asks about value proposition of

blood Canopure
 Org. structure includes division management, scientists, manufacturing staff, and 3  Asks about blood substitute
dedicated sales employees
market, including size, customers,
 Capital sources: recently received $50 million in capital from Venture Capital and competitors
 Other products in development, but not for 2 to 4 years  Asks about costs of production
 Production capacity (units): 300,000 units of Canopure; additional volume requires  Better candidate:
substantial investment  Asks about production capacity
 Canopure‐specific
 Identifies that Canopure may be a
 Value proposition of Canopure: readily available; does not require refrigeration; long shelf‐ disruptive technology that may
life (2 years vs. 2 months); faster recovery expand the overall market
 Costs: not known at this stage  Identifies impact of veterinarians
 Canine blood substitutes market on final price of Canopure
 Exhibit 1 – give this to interviewee next  Indicates understanding of
 Low blood availability is the biggest limiting factor on the number of canine blood implications that client is a small,
transfusions performed private company with limited
 Competition: No company currently in FDA trials; at least 3 to 5 years out access to capital
 Retail pricing: Typical practice for veterinarians is to mark‐up products 100% from the price NEXT STEP: MOVE ON TO
they pay to the price they charge pet owners SIZING THE POTENTIAL
MARKET FOR CANINE BLOOD
SUBSTITUTES
INTERVIEWER ONLY
80
Case 4: LifeRenew
Exhibit 1: Annual Canine Care Market
Avg. No. Number Number of Transfusions Cost of Blood ABL Cases % of ABL Cases
Practice Type of Doctors of Practices Average Total Unit of Blood Total Number Annually w/Transfusion
Primary care practice 1.0 4,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,200 4,800,000 8%
1 Doctor practices
2.0 4,800 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2,400 11,520,000 67%
2 Doctor practices
3+ Doctor practices 4.6 6,400 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3,600 23,040,000
Avg. primary care practice 2.7 16,000 200 3,200,000 $50 $160,000,000 2,968 39,360,000
Emergency care practice 4.0 4,000 2,000 8,000,000 $50 $400,000,000 3,000 12,000,000
Avg. emergency care practice
Total veterinarian practices ‐ 20,000 ‐ 11,200,000 $50 $560,000,000 ‐ 51,360,000 22%
 Intro: “Here is data we collected on the canine care market”  Many more primary care than emergency care
 Questions to ask: practices
 Identify key observations from data (examples to right)  Able to ignore breakout of primary care practices
 Calculate the current market size (# of practices * # of transfusions and focuses on average subtotal
* cost of blood / unit): 51M cases, or $560M
 Emergency care conduct many more
 Which market should LifeRenew target? Emergency care practices transfusions/year and see more ABL cases
 Keys to section:  No. of transfusions and ABL cases are market drivers
− LifeRenew has limited resources as private company – needs to
target portion of market
 ~20% of ABL cases receive transfusions – there may
− Identifies market may be bigger if more transfusions are performed
be an opportunity to expand market if blood
availability increases
 NEXT STEP: OPTIMAL PRICE
INTERVIEWER ONLY
81
Case 4: LifeRenew: Handout
Exhibit 1: Annual Canine Care Market

Practice Type Avg. No. Number Avg. No. of Cost of Unit Acute Blood Percent of ABL Cases
of Doctors of Practices Transfusions of Blood Loss Cases w/Transfusion
Primary care practice
1 Doctor practices 1.0 4,000 ‐ ‐ 1,200
2 Doctor practices 2.0 4,800 ‐ ‐ 2,400
3+ Doctor practices 4.6 6,400 ‐ ‐ 3,600
Avg. primary care practice 2.7 16,000 200 $50 2,968 8%
Emergency care practice

Avg. emergency care practice 4.0 4,000 2,000 $50 3,000 67%
Total veterinarian practices ‐ 20,000 ‐ $50 ‐ 22%
Assumption: 1 unit of blood per transfusion
* Average cost of a unit of blood to the veterinarian
82
Case 4: LifeRenew
Survey question: How willing are you to trial Canopure at the following price?
Price per unit Price per unit
$500 Noncritical Cases Critical Cases
$500 Noncritical Cases Critical Cases
$400 $400
$300 $300
$200 $200
$100 $100
$0 $0
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of Veterinarians Willing to Trial Product Percent of Pet Owners Willing to Trial Product
 Intro: “We conducted survey to determine  Pet owners have higher willingness to trial
willingness to trial the product. See results above”
 Questions to ask:
 Vets are more price sensitive overall
 Identify key observations from data (examples to right)  Critical cases have higher willingness to trial
 How much should LifeRenew charge for Canopure?  Price that Vets pay will not be the same that pet owners
pay (typically vets charge a 100% mark‐up to their cost)
 Keys to section:
− Links prior target market recommendation with this
section (ex., critical care, higher price)
− Recall small size of LifeRenew limits ability to serve large
number of customers
 NEXT STEP: WRAP‐UP
INTERVIEWER ONLY
83
Case 4: LifeRenew: Handout
Survey question: How willing are you to trial Canopure at the following price?
Exhibit 2: Vet Willingness to Trial Canopure Exhibit 3: Pet Owner Willingness to Trial Canopure
Price per unit Price per unit
$500 Noncritical Cases Critical Cases $500 Noncritical Cases Critical Cases
$400 $400
$300 $300
$200 $200
$100 $100
$0 $0
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percent of Veterinarians Willing to Trial Product Percent of Pet Owners Willing to Trial Product
84
Case 4: LifeRenew: Conclusion (2 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
(GOOD) LifeRenew should target market and distribute Canopure to Emergency Care Clinics
(BETTER) LifeRenew should target market and distribute Canopure to Emergency Care
Clinics at a price of $200/unit.

 Focusing on emergency clinics will allow LifeRenew to serve the largest percent of market with the fewest
amount of customers (80/20 rule)
Notes
 Distribution: how will this product be supplied and how will potential distribution partners affect overall
pricing
 Profitability: want to know total cost to determine profitability of Canopure

85


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
86
Initial
Structure
Analysis
87
Case 5: Steel Corp
Potential Behavioral Pre‐Case Questions Case Overview

Tell me a about a time when you assumed a leadership role? What do you think made you a Format: Interviewee‐led
good leader? Difficulty level: 3/5
Topic: Growth Strategy
Looking back on your career to date, what's one thing you wish you could have done differently
and why? Industry: Industrial (Steel)
− Strategy analysis
Case Question
Our client, Steel Corp, is a privately held automotive flat steel producer serving
North American automotive OEMs. The steel industry as a whole has
experienced steady growth over the last decade due to increased North American Interviewer Guide
auto production. In the past, Chinese and Brazilian steel imports have taken a  Keys to the case
significant portion of North American market share, however recently the markets − The North American steel market
have seen a more stable distribution. is heavily tied to the Automotive
industry
− This is a commoditized market so
product differentiation is very
Steel Corp has asked us to develop a strategy that would allow them to reach difficult
30% market share by 2025. (Currently 2015) − Organic growth would not fall
within the required timeframe
 Recommendation is that Steel
Corp acquires a competitor
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Question 1 next page

88
Case 5: Steel Corp
 Good candidate:
 Understands that there may be
Additional Facts (provide if asked) production limitation for Steel Corp
Steel Corp:  Asks probing questions about the

• Current production: 4,000,000 tons per year current and future state of the steel
• Current production capacity: 4,600,000 tons per year market
• Current market share: 20%
 Understands that this is a
Flat Steel Industry: commoditized good
• Current price of steel is $500 per ton and is expected to increase 20% over the next decade
• Average margin for a ton of steel is 15%  Better candidate:
• Steel demand is expected to grow by 25% over the next decade  Builds a quick and concise
• Governments can impose import restrictions framework that touches on the
• Capital projects within this industry usually have extremely long lead times, sometimes taking market, competition, customers,
10‐15 years to get a new facility up and running and capabilities
Competitors: (There are no production constraints for competitors)  Realizes a new facility will not fit
1) New Steel: 15% market share (privately held) (Max Capacity: 4,000,000) into the timeframe
2) National Steel: 25% market share (publically held) (Max Capacity: 6,500,000)
3) HD Steel: 10% market share (privately held) (Max Capacity: 2,500,000)  Asks relevant questions about
4) Imports: 30% market share customer relationships
Customer:  Notes the fact that MS will remain

• OEMs typically maintain long term relationships and will rarely switch suppliers constant in 2025
• All OEMs are expected to grow at an equal rate (market shares will remain constant)
INTERVIEWER ONLY
89
Case 5: Steel Corp
Candidate should calculate the size and breakdown of the market for Interviewer Guide
both 2015 and 2025
 Good candidate:
 Correctly calculates the 2015 and
Production Figures for 2015 and 2025 2025 productions numbers
• To reach 30% market share Steel Corp • At this point if candidate did not ask,  Presents the data in a organized
would need to produce and sell 7,500,000 Interviewer should note that OEMs and readable way
tons of steel per year rarely switch suppliers
 Clearly states the required
• To reach that number Steel Corp would • If asked, market share will stay the production needed to reach 30%
need to add an additional 2,900,000 tons same in 2025 for all producers market share
of production capacity
Producer Market Share Production 2015 Production 2025  Recognizes the fact that Steel Corp
has a production constraint and will
Steel Corp 20% 4,000,000 5,000,000 not be able to meet future demand
New Steel 15% 3,000,000 3,750,000  Correctly notes the production

shortfall (for 30% market share)
National Steel 25% 5,000,000 6,250,000
HD Steel 10% 2,000,000 2,500,000
Imports 30% 6,000,000 7,500,000
INTERVIEWER ONLY
90
Case 5: Steel Corp
Candidate should come up with some potential growth options, Interviewer Guide
realizing that an acquisition meets all the clients needs
 Good candidate:
 Lists out potential options and
Potential Solutions addresses some risk factors
associated with those options
Option 1: Acquire New Steel
• Potential Benefits:  Correctly identifies an appropriate
‐ OEMs are not likely to switch suppliers so organic growth would not get you to 30% acquisition target
‐ This would be the most appropriate target to meet the 2,900,000 production shortfall
‐ There may be some synergies between the two companies  Clearly communicates thoughts and
‐ Economies of scale provides supporting rationale
• Potential Risks:
‐ Acquisition price may not make economic sense
‐ Antitrust issues
 Demonstrates an understanding of
‐ Cultural fit between the two companies
market risk factors associated with
‐ Raw material sourcing/long term obligation raw materials and OEMs
• The two key points here are that Steel Corp does not have the capacity to meet future demand
 Notes the fact that equal OEM
as is. In order to reach their stated goal they would need to acquire both capacity and
growth would result in no MS
customers.
change for 2025
• New Steel production facilities or new steel grades would deal with extremely long lead times
 Provides a reasonable estimate for
and fall outside the range of the clients stated goal.
what the value of additional
capacity would be
• Candidate could figure out what a reasonable price for an acquisition should be (using the
additional tonnage times the margin received per ton).
INTERVIEWER ONLY
91
Case 5: Steel Corp
Suggested answer:
1) Steel Corp should look to acquire New Steel
2) Steel Corp should look to take controlling interest in publically traded National Steel
(51% ownership)

 New facilities would not be online quick enough to meet the customers needs
 New customers are difficult to acquire without a significant change in the market itself
 Steel Corp has a production constraint and needs to acquire additional capacity
Notes

92


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
93
Initial
Structure
Analysis
94
Case 6: FlyMe.com

 Tell me about your most recent performance review at your pre‐MBA Format: Interviewer‐led
job. Both the positive and negative aspects. Difficulty level: 2/5
 At what point in your life or career were you the most busy or overwhelmed? Topic: Profitability
How did you handle it? Industry: Travel / e‐commerce
− Profit drivers
Case Question
− Buyer/supplier power
− Turnaround
Our client, FlyMe.com is a US‐based online travel agency (OTA) – similar to
Expedia, Priceline, etc. They sell flights, hotel rooms, car rentals, and other travel
products on their website directly to consumers. Their inventory comes from all Interviewer Guide
of the major travel suppliers (airlines, hoteliers, car rental companies, etc.).  Keys to the case
Although the travel industry is large and growing, our client has recently − The issue is on the revenue side 
experienced a drop in profitability. airlines are paying less commission
to OTAs for each flight sold
They have hired us to (1) figure out why profits are down, and (2) what they can − Criticaltogettotherootoftheissue
do to turn around the business. before trying to suggest ways to
solve it
− The business model of an OTA
may not be totally intuitive  a
strong candidate will problem
solve their way through
understanding
INTERVIEWER ONLY
95
Case 6: FlyMe.com: Additional Info
Pre Framework Interviewer Guide
Interviewer: only provide these details if asked
Good candidate:
o Recognizes this is a
 Industry‐specific:
straightforward profitability
o OTA business model – ecommerce site that sells travel related content to consumers. Make
problem
money by charging a commission to content providers (airlines, hoteliers, etc.) on each sale.
o Asks enough questions to fully
o Markets – most OTAs are regional – a few big players in the US, Asia, Europe, South America
understand the situation
o Different than travel aggregators (Kayak) – aggregators don’t actually sell content
 Company‐specific  Better candidate:

o Location – operatemostly in theUS; havesome subsidiarieselsewhere,butsmall o Engages with the interviewee
during the prompt /
o Products – sell a broadrangeof products(flights,hotels, etc.) from a broadrangeof providers
understanding stage
o Reputation – verywell known brand;householdname in theUS
o Asks 2nd level questions before
jumping into framework  will
 Competitor‐specific:
help structure what the
o 5‐6 main competitors in the US
framework should contain
o 2 are profitable; the rest are experiencing declines like us
o Industry has seen recent consolidation
NEXT STEP: Create
framework (example on next
This is a simple prompt – the candidate should quickly move into creating a slide)
profitability framework. Don’t let them ask too many questions up front.
INTERVIEWER ONLY
96
Case 6: FlyMe.com: Framework (2‐4 minutes)
Interviewer Guide
Profitability Framework
Interviewer: examples of what to look for – not a comprehensive list Good candidate:
o Includes all of the standard pieces
 Non‐company items (less relevant)
of a profitability framework
o Market / economy – travel spend is highly correlated with the economy
o Includes the piece about needing
o Competition – the consolidation is likely having an effect
to provide recommendations to
o Customers – are purchasing behaviors or customer needs changing?
fix the issue within the framework
o Suppliers – how are airlines and hotels doing? Are they happy selling through us?
 Company profitability (most relevant)
o Doesn’t just put the pieces of
o Revenue– P * Q  candidateshouldhighlightthisandincludesome extra detail
profitability – explains the drivers
o Cost– Fixed+ Variable candidateshouldhighlightthisandincludesome extra detail o Reads across, then down when
presenting framework
 How to fix the issue (relevant) o Provides a hypothesis of what is
o Candidate should at least note in the framework that a piece of the case is to recommend
driving a drop in profit
ways to fix the issue o Says where they want to start
o Does not need to be complete in the framework, but should be included after presenting framework
NEXT STEP: Profitability

After presenting the framework – push the candidate to suggest where to start
deep dive
INTERVIEWER ONLY
97
Case 6: FlyMe.com: Profitability Math (10 minutes)
Profitability Deep Dive Interviewer Guide
Interviewer: “Where would you like to start?”
Good candidate:
o Recognizes it is not a cost problem
The problem is in revenue, but they can start with cost if they’d like o Asks for specific information
 If asked about costs within revenue, not just “do you
o Interviewer: “Overall costs have been growing ~3% year over year. Growth is happening have revenue information”
across most key categories”
o NOT A COST ISSUE – PUSH THEM TOWARDS REVENUE IF THEY DON’T RECOGNIZE THIS  Better candidate:
QUICKLY o Recognizes that the cost growth is
roughly inflationary growth and to
be expected for a business
 Revenue
o Provides a rationale for the
o Interviewer:“Whatdo you wantto know aboutrevenue?”
revenue data they request
o If asked,primarysourcesof revenuearebookingfees chargedto suppliersforeachsale, andforbanner
advertisingon thewebsite
NEXT STEP: Revenue
o WHEN THEY MENTION PRODUCT BREAKDOWN, BOOKINGS INFO, VOLUME/RATE, ETC–
analysis using Exhibit 1
PROVIDE THEM WITHEXHIBIT 1
INTERVIEWER ONLY
98
Case 6: FlyMe.com
Exhibit 1: FlyMe.com Selected Financial Data – 2013 & 2014

2013 2014
Revenue ($M) Bookings (M) Revenue ($M) Bookings (M)
Product Revenue
Air $440 110 $319 159
Hotel $270 30 $331 31
Car Rental $75 15 $81 16
Cruise $15 5 $17 6
Banner Ad Revenue $150 N/A $149 N/A
Trip Insurance Revenue $50 2 $53 2
99
Case 6: FlyMe.com: Profitability Math
Exhibit 1: FlyMe.com Selected Financial Data – 2013 & 2014
2013 2014
Revenue ($M) Bookings (M) Avg. Booking % of Total Revenue ($M) Bookings (M) Avg. Booking % of Total
Fee Revenue Fee Revenue
Product Revenue $440 110 $4 44% $319 159 ~ $2 34%
Air
Hotel $270 30 $9 27% $331 31 ~ $11 35%
Car Rental $75 15 $5 8% $81 16 ~ $5 9%
Cruise $15 5 $3 2% $17 6 ~ $3 2%
Banner Ad Revenue $150 N/A N/A 15% $149 N/A N/A 16%
Trip Insurance Revenue $50 2 $25 5% $53 2 ~ $25 6%
Total: $1,000 $950
Interviewer Guide Key Observations from Data – Interviewee

should get most of these
 Interviewer: “What does this revenue data tell us?”
• Air and Hotel are the largest revenue drivers
 Additional Guidance for Interviewer: • Hotels and Insurance have the largest booking
o Have them walk through the data contained in the table fee, and therefore relative profit margin,
o If they don’t recognize that booking fees could be an issue, have because it is all commission
them calculate average booking fee for each category, each year • Air booking fees are dropping year‐over‐year
(answers provided in red) – BAD
o 2014 SHOULD BE ESTIMATES – THIS IS A TEST FOR PRACTICALITY • Hotels and Insurance booking fees are
o Good candidate will also do rough % of total estimation (in red) to growing even more year‐over‐year
see which categories are most important)
THE CANDIDATE SHOULD CONCLUDE THAT THE
o If asked, the end ticket prices to consumers have stayed the same DROP IN AIR BOOKING FEES IS THE PRIMARY
 NEXT STEP: Brainstorm drivers to lower Air booking fee DRIVER TO DECLINING REVENUE
INTERVIEWER ONLY
100
Case 6: FlyMe.com: Brainstorm (5 minutes)
Brainstorm Interviewer Guide
Interviewer: “What could be causing this drop in Air booking fees?”
Good candidate:
o Summarizes findings from the
There are many potential answers. Ensure the answers make sense.
math portion before moving on
Some potential examples are: o Writes down brainstorm ideas
rather than just reciting
 Airlines have strong bargaining power and are pressuring OTAs to drop fees
o Doesn’t give completely illogical
 Contract renewals just occurred and the new fee is lower
reasons
 Airlines are selling more flights on own websites – we had to drop fees to keep
the content on our site
 Air ticket prices are dropping overall o Is hypothesis‐driven when
 Mix shift of lower cost airline tickets (Spirit, Frontier) being sold vs. higher priced brainstorming
(Hawaiian, American) o Gives justification for each item in
 A competitor dropped booking fees – we had to follow suit brainstorm
 Many others…
NEXT STEP: Brainstorm ways
to turn around the revenue
Once they provide at least 3‐5 answers, tell them: decline
Interviewer: “A lot of factors contributed, but we had to drop the air booking fees
to stay competitive – there was nothing we could do”
INTERVIEWER ONLY
101
Case 6: FlyMe.com (5 minutes)
Brainstorm & Conclusion Interviewer Guide
Interviewer: “Given this, what can the client do to improve revenue?”
Good candidate:
o Writes down brainstorm ideas
There are many potential answers. Ensure the answers make sense.
rather than just reciting
Some potential examples are: o Doesn’t focus on the air booking
fees – we said this was set
 Focus on Hotel – booking fees are high and rising
 Focus on selling Trip Insurance – revenue per purchase is huge and growing  Better candidate:
 Increase advertising to drive more traffic to the site – will increase bookings and o Brings in data from in the preview
drive up banner ad revenue section – i.e. Hotel and Insurance
 Offer bundles Air bookings (hotel, car) – will help drive bookings to higher margin have large booking fees
products o Think outside the box and gives
 Consolidate with a competitor to increase bargaining power against airlines creative ideas to improve revenue
 Many others… o In conclusion:
o Summarizes case
o References data from case
o Provides risks of the
recommendations
Once they provide at least 3‐5 answers, drive towards a case conclusion:
o Provides next steps past
what was covered in case
Interviewer: “Ok, great. We are going to meet with the client now – what do we
tell them based on what we’ve covered today?”
INTERVIEWER ONLY
102
Case 6: FlyMe.com: Conclusion (5 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
(GOOD) Profits are down due to revenue and the Company should focus on hotels where booking
fees are higher
(BETTER) To overcome the $50M revenue shortfall impacting profits the Company should pursue a
bundling strategy with hotels and car rental companies to drive bookings to higher margin products.

103


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
104
Initial
Structure
Analysis
105
Case 7: MexTell

 Tell me about a time when you failed. Format: Interviewee led
Difficulty level: 3/5
 Tell me about another time when you failed.
Topic: Acquisition
Industry: Telecommunications
− Math
Case Question
− Valuation
Our client is a major U.S. cell phone service provider with $45 billion in revenues.
They have recently been buying companies in an attempt to expand their
network, and have been notified of a potential window to acquire MexTell, a Interviewer Guide
Mexican Cellular network. They’ve determined the deal will be worth the trouble  Keys to the case
likely to come from activist investors if MexTell is worth more than $6 billion. − This is meant to be a math heavy
testing ground; candidate will have
Should they acquire? to structure and calculate quickly
to keep from losing control
− Valuation meeting the threshold is
largely based on the growth and
interest rates used in DCF.
 Recommendation is dependent
entirely on candidate’s chosen WACC
and growth assumptions.

106
Case 7: MexTell: Framework (5 minutes max)
“Should our client acquire MexTell?” NOTE: Relevant information for candidate in BOLD
Suggested Framework (and answers) for determining if value is >$6B Interviewer Guide
What does the What does the Should we do the  Good candidate:
Mexican Cellular MexTell Income deal? What are the  Creates a framework that catches
Market look like? Statement look like? Risks and Next Steps the major levers and risks to the
deal
‐Competition is non‐existent ‐ Need to understand the Valuation Methods:
‐Industry growth has been major revenue and cost DCF: Need income statement  Ensures that valuation and risks to
steady at 5% YOY streams to be able to value Comps: Need other deals the deal are part of the framework
‐Major substitutes don’t the company: Book Value: Balance Sheet
exists  Better candidate:
‐Prevalence of cell phones in Suggested Risks:  Understands from the prompt that
Mexican society has been
growing at 5% per year
‐Everything else is irrelevant,
π ‐Client moving internationally
‐Regulatory environment in
Mexico is different
a final number of > or < $6B is the
goal, and creates a framework
based on valuation methods
and should be deflected ‐What is the adjusted WACC commonly used (DCF, Comps, Book
given the move? Value)
R C ‐Lack of competition given
profit margin of 18% seems
unlikely; either illegal activity
of soon‐to‐enter competition
Price/ Number of FC VC
User Users (Overhead) (Rental of
(Segments?) Satellite
Bandwidth)
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Numbers on Profit Tree next

107
Case 7: MexTell: Income Statement (15 minutes max)
NOTE: Number to provide are highlighted in BOLD
Basic Premium Ultra SUM
Interviewer Guide
Users 300,000 1,500,000 50,000 $ 1,850,000
Price $ 40 $ 100 $ 150
 Good candidate:
Monthly $ 12,000,000 $ 150,000,000 $ 7,500,000 $ 169,500,000  Creates a structure after realizing
REVENUE the volume of information they are
Annual $ 144,000,000 $ 1,800,000,000 $ 90,000,000 $ 2,034,000,000 about to get.
 Keeps a structure through most of
REVENUE
the profit tree, asking for relevant
VC/User $ 5 $ 10 $ 10 information when needed
Total VC $ 1,500,000 $ 15,000,000 $ 500,000 $ 17,000,000  Calculates numbers as they go.
FC as % of Rev 40% 60% 60%
Total FC $ 4,800,000 $ 90,000,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 99,300,000  Better candidate:
Monthly COST $ 6,300,000 $ 105,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 116,300,000  Realizes that in order to get to a
Annual COST $ 75,600,000 $ 1,260,000,000 $ 60,000,000 $ 1,395,600,000 Valuation they need a profit, and
makes a structure to get the data
Gross Monthly $ 5,700,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 53,200,000  Does math as necessary to keep the
numbers flowing, but doesn’t
Profit interrupt data capture
Gross Annual $ 68,400,000 $ 540,000,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 638,400,000  Realizes that Basic Users<<Premium
Profit users; hypothesizes that Basic price
Tax Rate 40% 40% 40% may be too high for average GDP,
and flags for “opportunity review”
Annual Tax $ 27,360,000 $ 216,000,000 $ 12,000,000 $ 255,360,000
 Realizes that total users<<pop. of
Burden Mexico since Mextell has no
Net Annual $ 41,040,000 $ 324,000,000 $ 18,000,000 $ 383,040,000 competition; flags as growth
Profit potential
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Valuation next

108
Case 7: MexTell: Valuation (5 minutes max)
NOTE: Relevant information for candidate in BOLD
Three potential Valuation Methods Interviewer Guide
DCF: We have the

Comps: “No Data in
Book Value: “We  Good candidate:
information, so this don’t have their  Knows all three methods, and
recent history” quickly identifies that DCF is the
is the way to go asset data”
way to go with the data we have
‐Competition is non‐existent KEY POINTS:
 Has an intelligent discussion on
‐Industry growth has been ‐ WACC decision determines
interest rates and growth
steady at 5% YOY deal validity
projections
‐Major substitutes don’t ‐ Growth projections are
exist also critical; is 5% forever
‐Prevalence of cell phones in likely? (Based on data left,  Better candidate:
Mexican society has been answer is “Yes” but an  Understands that WACC is based on
growing at 5% per year intelligent discussion on risk inherent in this deal and this
‐Everything else is irrelevant, competition is warranted industry, not just on the company or
and should be deflected here) client itself; when provided with
10% as the company’s WACC,
suggests that we use a higher WACC
$383,040,000
15% WACC: DCF = = $ 3,830,400,000.00 to capture the extra risk in this deal
15 ‐5
 Realizes that WACC makes or
breaks the deal, and suggests
$383,040,000 further due diligence on
10% WACC: DCF = = $ 7,660,800,000.00 determining the right WACC
10 ‐5
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Conclusion

109
Case 7: MexTell: Conclusion (2 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
(GOOD) Our client should continue purchase of MexTell based on a $7.6B valuation
(BETTER) We should continue our due diligence in order to determine the correct WACC to
evaluate this deal with, lest we miss our target.

 Strong profit margins of ~20% on gross revenue
 Lack of competition makes future position much more secure, even with competitive entry
 WACC changes of 5% change valuation from $2B above our benchmark to $2B below benchmark; WACC is single
most important factor here
Notes
 A star candidate will realize that Basic Users are far 5x fewer than Premium users, despite price tag. A good
hypothesis is that Basic price may be too high for average GDP, and Premium users are mostly business. This is a
good opportunity to adjust prices to better capture the segments.
 A star candidate will also notice that MexTell has no competition, yet holds far fewer subscribers than the
population of Mexico; huge opportunity for growth, or competition, depending on the regulation.

110


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
111
Initial
Structure
Analysis
112
Case 8: SunFury

 Tell me about a time when you had to give a team member unpleasant Format: Interviewer‐led
feedback. How did you approach the situation? What would you do differently? (McKinsey style)
 What’s the hardest feedback you’ve received? How did you take it?
Topic: Market Entry
Industry: Energy (Solar)
Case Question
− Market sizing
− Strategy analysis
Our client, SunFury, is a publically traded solar developer and the largest builder
of utility scale solar projects across the US. They have experienced incredible
growth over the last 6 years, due largely to the rapidly falling solar module prices Interviewer Guide
from China and the consistent US tax credit for solar projects. In 2017 the Solar  Keys to the case
Investment Tax Credit (ITC) will drop from 30% for all solar to 10% for utility and − The residential solar market is a
0% for residential, forcing the industry to compete more closely with cheap coal huge potential market that has
only been partially tapped
and natural gas.
− Competitionisveryfierce,asmany
differentplayersaretryingtocompete.
It is August 2015, and SunFury has decided to expand their operations into the − Market is unprofitable without
residential arena to better capture the ITC while it still exists. They have asked us ITC, and SunFury cannot recoup
to (1) estimate the potential value at stake, and (2) determine whether they investment costs in time.
should go ahead with their residential launch in 2016.  Recommendation is that SunFury
allocate resources to utility projects.

113
Case 8: SunFury: Market Sizing Portion (15 minutes max)
“Given that SunFury is targeting US residential solar, how many homes can we target?”
Note: If candidate starts to make a framework, redirect them to answer the question
All critical information is provided below in bold – any additional Interviewer Guide
information requested can be made up or stated as irrelevant.
 Good candidate:
(Information in italic brackets is suggested assumption range)  Understands that this is a market
sizing and requires no prompting
Sequence of events and required data
TASK: Estimate number of homes in the US that have suitable roofs  Makes reasonable assumptions
a) Assume 320M people in US and (80‐100M) families about home ownership and
b) Assume (40‐80%) of families live single or multi‐family domiciles (homes), and that population density
others live in large apartment complexes, mobile homes, etc (not suitable for solar)
 Understands what information they
Things they should then ask: will need to answer the question as
1. “Can we build solar everywhere in the US?” (GIVE HANDOUT 1, NEXT PAGE) it comes up
a) Follow on question should be “Ok, what is population density?” or some
deviation thereof (GIVE HANDOUT 2, NEXT PAGE)  Better candidate:
b) Based on 2 handouts, acceptable estimates of population living in solar  Lays out the steps to the problem in
radiation zones >5kWh/m2/day is between 30‐50% (CA+TX is 80M) advance; knows how they will get
c) This yields a PAM of (9.5‐40M homes) (Give 15M once math is complete) to a number and the information
2. “How many homes already have solar?” Can assume 20‐50%, then provide 40% they need before they start
a) This means the TAM is 9M homes
 Reads the footnotes to find out the
If candidate gets stuck at any point, or work at this question passes 10 minutes, solar cutoff is >5 kWh/m2/day
provide 9 million homes as the answer and move to question 2.
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Handout 1 and 2 next page

114
Case 8: SunFury: Handout 1
Footnote:
(1) SOURCE: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 1961‐1990
(2) Expert analysis has shown that residential solar with SunFury™ solar panels is profitable when kWh/m2/day is >5 on an annualized basis
115
Case 8: SunFury: Handout 2
Footnote:
(1) SOURCE: US Census Bureau
116
Case 8: SunFury: Market Sizing Portion (15 minutes max)
“The client would like to know how many solar panels they could sell based on your
estimate of 9M homes. How would you structure this problem?”
Answer: 225M panels: critical information is provided below in bold Interviewer Guide
 Good candidate:
Sequence of events and required data  Given the prompting, lays out the
Candidate should understand they will need to find the number of panels per home, which rough structure in advance
requires knowing:
1. Size of average roof:  Knows the information they need at
a) “The average American home is single story, and roughly 1600sqft” each point in the process
b) 1600sqft means that there is 40’x40’ of roof
2. Size of the SunFury solar panel: “Each solar panel is 2m x 3m”  Does math correctly and quickly
3. Number of panels that can fit on a roof:
a) The panel can be estimated to be 6’x9’, which yields 54sqft/panel (55’ OK)
b) This means that 1600’/55’ = ~29 panels COULD fit on the roof
 Lays out the correct structure in
NOTE: A great candidate will recognize that you can’t fit panels extending over the edge of
advance and knows therefore
the roof, so you can really only fit 6 wide (roof is 40’ wide, so 6 panels at 6’ is 36’) and 4
panels tall. knows what information they need
before they begin the math
The number of panels/home is therefore 6*4=24 panels (tell them to round to 25)
 Quickly realizes that the size of the
The final number of panels SunFury could potentially sell is 225M panels
roof and the size of the panels
aren’t perfectly divisible, and
Help candidate along if needed; if time on this question passes 10 minutes with no
therefore need to be calculated by
endpoint in sight, give them assumptions as necessary to reach 225M panels
row x column.
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Question 3 next

117
Case 8: SunFury: Strategy Portion (15 minutes max)
“The client is excited, and wants to launch immediately. What information do you still
need to recommend that SunFury move into residential solar?”
Expect the candidate will make framework to structure relevant info. Interviewer Guide
Suggest framework and sequence of events  Good candidate:

 Creates a framework that catches
the major levers and risks
Do external Do internal Are there relevant
conditions support? conditions support? Risks? Next Steps?  Determines the profit that SunFury
could capture based on Profit Tree
“The residential solar market “Business Model: SunFury “There is an engineering and  Comes to the conclusion
is extremely competitive right sells home owners the panels certification process that competition will drive down market
now, with 10‐12 regional at an ‘All‐inclusive cost’ per must be completed to launch share to <10%
players, all at the same price panel, similar in price to the a residential solar system.
point, in each market we competition” Based on the reduced  Notices the initial negative profit,
want to launch in.” Price = $355/panel timeline to launch by January and recalls the ITC without
“We are offering a Material Cost= $300/panel 2016, we expect it will cost prompting
commodity product here” Labor + Permit = $5000/roof $35M to launch the system”
(Note: equals $200/panel) “Logistics and training will
Based on the above, cost us $50M to ramp up in 6  Better candidate:
reasonable assumptions of Total Cost/Panel is => $500, months”  Looks back to their notes and
the market share we can and Tax Credit is 30%, so cost remembers that the ITC goes away
expect to get is (5‐10%). Any after the ITC is $350 Based on upper bound of in one year
higher, and push back for market capture (10%) and
unreasonable assumptions of Profit: $5/panel @22.5M startup cost of $85, we will  Comes to the conclusion that the
capturing market share so panels (10% market share) so only be very close to breaking upper bounds are not profitable
quickly in a saturated market. Potential Profit = $112.5M even: max profit ~$25M
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Conclusion next

118
Case 8: SunFury: Conclusion (5 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
(GOOD) SunFury should not enter the residential market.
(BETTER) SunFury should instead focus on locking in and completing utility projects before
the ITC lowers by 20%, reducing their profit margin significantly.

 The fierce competition reduces market share available to <20%
 Duration of ITC is only one year from launch date
 Startup costs make this an unprofitable endeavor

119


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
120
Initial
Structure
Analysis
121
Case 9: Camilla’s Pets

 Tellmeaboutatimewhenyouhadtochangedirectiononatask.Whatdidyoudo? Format: Interviewee‐led
(McKinsey style)
 Tell me about a time when you tried really hard, but you still failed. What did Difficulty level: 2/5
you learn?
Topic: Market Entry
Industry: Retail
Case Question
− Profitability
− Strategic analysis
Our client, Camilla’s Pets is a regional pet store chain based in San Francisco. The
Company’s profits are $64M and they have 400 stores. Over the last 5 years the
Company has performed exceptionally well and is now interested in a chartering a Interviewer Guide
national expansion. A key concern Camilla’s Pets would like to address before  Keys to the case
undertaking the expansion is improving individual store performance per sq. − Actively presenting frameworks
meters. The average store has an area of 2000 sq. meters. − Actively ask for information
− Remain calm if the case changes
You and the team have been brought in to identify the factors that drive store direction
performance and perform an analysis of how floor space is currently utilized. − Pay attention when reading charts

122
Case 9: Camilla’s Pets: Profit Tree Portion (10 minutes max)
“What are the factors that should be considered with assessing store performance?”
Note: candidate may try other frameworks, but steer them towards a profit tree
All critical information is provided below in bold – any additional Interviewer Guide
information requested can be made up or stated as irrelevant.
 Good candidate:
(Information in italic brackets is suggested assumption range)  Takes initiative, proposes a
path forward and starts
Sequence of events and required data developing hypothesis
TASK 1: Calculate the avg profit per store. The candidate should have captured the following notes:
a) profits are $64M  Gets industry specific with the
b) 400 stores
framework (e.g. retail and pet
c) 2000 sq. meters per store
store related)
Answer: $80.00 per sq. meters  Asks questions about the

market (e.g. size and growth)
Things they should then ask:
1. Are there any major outliers: No  Better candidate:
2. What other locations are included in the region: Not Relevant  Ask why the chain wants to
3. Should anything else be included in store performance: Only profit expand
TASK 2 : Draw out a profit tree and highlight some of the major costs of a retailer  Asks about specific targets
Things they should then ask about:  Inquires about technology (i.e.
1. Are there non‐obvious expenses or revenue (e.g. special taxes)? Not Relevant online retail, social media,
2. Where is our client versus industry benchmarks? Not Relevant etc.)
3. Does the pet store items sell other than pets? Yes
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Sample profit tree next page

123
Case 9: Camilla’s Pets: Profit Tree Portion
Potential Framework
Profit Tree
Costs
Revenues
Fixed Costs Variable Costs

New Pricing Other: Licensing, etc.
Products
Property Pet Washing Utilities Shipping
Loyalty Program Equipment Labor
Increase
Non‐
Food
food
Interviewer Guide
 Intro: “Let’s step through your approach”  Good candidate
 Keys to section: • Presents non‐canned framework in a structured manner
− Discusses costs and revenue related items • Able to talk through thought process while developing
framework
− Identifies growth opportunities from current and new
 Better candidate
stores
• Unveiling hypotheses along the way and not afraid to
 NEXT STEP: Prioritizing opportunities disregard some of these
• Thinks about “how” areas are under performing

124
Case 9: Camilla’s Pets: Calculations (5 minutes max)
“The client has changed their minds and now would like the team to just focus on animal sales.
They have decided they would like us to increase the floor space allocation for two types of
animals. Here is the data collected by our analysts.”
Sequence of events and required data Interviewer Guide

Read the following information to the candidate: Only 5% of profits come from animal purchases.
Assume floor space is equally distributed by animal types.  Good candidate:
 Remains calm and not thrown by
Task 1) Obtain additional information: the case twist
Do NOT Give Expenses, Growth, or Charts Until Asked:  Understands that they need
Revenues:
Expenses: Growth %: Answers: GP and GP% additional information, but does
Reptiles ‐ 5895
Reptiles ‐ 4295 Reptiles – 10% Reptiles – 1600 / 27% not actively ask or assume more
Birds ‐ 5073
Birds ‐ 5073 Birds – 15% Birds – 2400 / 47% information.
Hamster ‐ 4647
Hamster ‐ 4647 Hamster – 10% Hamster – 1360 / 29%
Gerbils ‐ 8958
Gerbils ‐ 8958 Gerbils – 10% Gerbils – 2000 / 22%  Quickly understands the chart and
Fish ‐ 2416
Fish ‐ 2416 Fish – 5% Fish – 640 / 26% communicates what they see
Once candidate has performed gross profit (GP) calculation give charts 1 and 2
*If candidate realized all information is needed give charts right away.  Performs calculations quickly
Ask the candidate which animals they should recommend:

Task 2) Actively read and understand simple charts including foot notes:  Understands immediately that they
need both costs and growth to
Candidate should quickly recognize that birds generate the most revenue and are the most make an informed decision
profitable animal. Reptiles and Hamsters have the second highest revenues and GPs, respectively,
but fish generate significantly more ancillary services and product revenue.
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Handouts 1 and 2 next

125
Case 9: Camilla’s Pets: Handout 1
Profitability Per Animal

$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$‐
Reptiles Birds Hamster Gerbils Fish

Footnote:
(1) Fish generate more ancillary product purchases than reptiles, hamsters, and gerbils combined.
126
Case 9: Camilla’s Pets: Handout 2
Nat'l Growth Rates

16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Reptiles Birds Hamster Gerbils Fish
127
Case 9: Camilla’s Pets: Conclusion (2 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
(GOOD) Camilla’s pets should focus on birds and fish.

(BETTER) Camilla’s pets should focus on birds dues to the 14% growth rate and fish dues to
the smaller growth rate of 5%, but massive increase to ancillary product sales.

128


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
129
Initial
Structure
Analysis
130
Case 10: Hrdwr2Softwr

 Tell me about a time when you had to change someone’s mind Format: Interviewer‐driven
 Tell me about a time when you had to manage the interests of conflicting Difficulty level: 2/5
stakeholders Topic: Operations, Market
Entry
Industry: TMT (Tech)
Case Question
− Growth strategy
− Operations
Your client is a networking equipment provider with roughly $2B in revenue, but
sales have declined over the past few years. There is a general trend in the
industry towards software‐defined networking (SDN) so in response, the
company acquired several software assets over the past few years with one Interviewer Guide
significant acquisition this year. Although sales have been stagnant, the client set
 NOTE: Case takes place in 2015
a very aggressive revenue target for the new SDN division.
− Understanding the basic
The company wants to hear your recommendation on the following: 1) How operations of a business
does the Company need to reorganize its departments in order to successfully − Perform moderate calculations
sell software? 2) Evaluate the go forward strategy for additional product − Read charts
offering.  Differentiation: creativity of
structure
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Question 1 cont’d next page

131
 Tips
Additional Facts (provide if asked) − This is an open‐style case:
goal is to push candidate to
 Company‐specific: make assumptions and come
−Company is a smaller player in network hardware up with creative solutions
−Customers include businesses of all sizes, public institutions, − Feel free to describe
telecommunication companies, other service providers and individuals the general operations
− Other products include: switches, routers, servers, interfaces and of a network provider
modules, etc  Good candidate:
− Company is based in Silicon Valley, CA −Asks general questions about
 Computer networking market the client
− Other major players switching to software −Asks general questions about
− Trend driven by need for increased automation, cost savings, flexibility, and the industry
application use
 Competition
− Competes against dozens of competitors globally
− Structures their thoughts
− Amongst the first to move to software
− Proposes a path forward
NEXT STEP: Framework
evaluation
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Sample framework next page

132
Potential Framework Functional Areas to Review
Commercial Operations R&D / Product Development
Sales Finance Customer

Marketing Service Engineering Product
HR
Management
Quality Control
Sales Rep Staffing Promotion Relationship Revenue Help Desk Software Support
Training Mgmt. Recognition
Interviewer Guide
 Intro: “Why don’t you walk me through your thoughts  Good candidate
about which department will undertake changes?” − Presents non‐canned framework in a structured manner
 Keys to section: − Able to talk through thought process while developing
framework
− Focus on the most significant areas changing
 Better candidate
− Suggest opportunities for growth or cost savings
− Unveiling hypotheses along the way and not afraid to
 NEXT STEP: Prioritizing areas to change disregard some of these
− Thinks about “how” these will impact the existing org
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Question 2 and 3 next page

“Which product strategy should the client pursue?”
Sequence of events and required data Interviewer Guide
Task 1) Could you tell me about some of the major trends in tech that might impact the need
for SDN (giving computers extra capacity, flexibility, and custom ability):  Good candidate:
− Let the interviewee brainstorm then present the charts  Actively brainstorms relevant
tech ideas and attempts to
Interviewee should comment on what they are seeing (e.g. the following): structure their thoughts (e.g.
‐ Mobile and video are increasing steadily compared to others top 3 ideas)
‐ Big dataand cloud have major upticks in lateryears
‐ Mobile has the most patents/ Video has the least  Actively read the charts and
communicate about what they
Once the interviewee has commented then inform the interviewee that the client would like to pursue all are observing
strategies.
 Quickly understand the chart
and communicate what they
Task 2) As a mid‐sized networking player valuation is also important. Calculate how many years see
will it take the software business to overtake hardware in valuation?
 Perform calculations quickly
‐ Company revenue is $2B today and declining at 5% YoY. and accurately
‐ Software business is $30M today and growing 100% YoY.
‐ How many years will it take the software business to overtake hardware in valuation? (Answer:  Better candidate:
year 3)  Is not thrown off that the
client has decided on all
strategies
 Demonstrates strong
knowledge of the technology
sector
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Handouts 1 and 2 next

134
Case 10: Hrdwr2Softwr: Handout 1
Which product strategy should the client pursue? Explain your logic.
Exhibit 1: Cloud Revenue Exhibit 2: Big Data Revenue

$140
Millions
2020
$120
2019
$100
$80 2018
$60 2017
$40
2016
$20
$‐ $40 $80
$‐
Millions
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Exhibit 3: Mobile Revenue Exhibit 4: Video Revenue

$200 $80
Millions
Millions
$180
$70
$160
$140 $60
$120 $50
$100 $40
$80
$30
$60
$40 $20
$20 $10
$‐ $‐
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
135
Case 10: Hrdwr2Softwr: Handout 2
Exhibit 5: 2020 Est. Segment Revenue, Customer Base and Patent Count
60
50
Represents
Patents Held by Segment
market size
Video
40
30
20 Big Data
10 Cloud Mobile
0
$50 $75 $100 $125 $150 $175 $200
2020 Est Segment Revenue ($M)
136
Case 10: Hrdwr2Softwr: Conclusion (2 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
(GOOD) The software business will overtake hardware in 3 years and the Company should pursue
product strategies in Cloud, Mobile, Video, and Big Data.
(BETTER) The software business will overtake hardware in 3 years. The Company can pursue all product
strategies as they all represent growth potential. The Company should focus on Mobile since it
represents the biggest market size and revenue while showing the highest rate of growth potential.
Alternatively, the Company can focus on Video as they hold the most patents in this area and there’s
potential to monetize them as the product grows.

137

 Tell me about a time when you had to change someone’s mind Format: Interviewer‐driven
 Tell me about a time when you had to manage the interests of conflicting Difficulty level: 2/5
stakeholders Topic: Operations, Market
Entry
Industry: TMT (Tech)
Case Question
− Growth strategy
− Operations
Your client is a networking equipment provider with roughly $2B in revenue, but
sales have declined over the past few years. There is a general trend in the
industry towards software‐defined networking (SDN) so in response, the
company acquired several software assets over the past few years with one Interviewer Guide
significant acquisition this year. Although sales have been stagnant, the client set
 NOTE: Case takes place in 2015
a very aggressive revenue target for the new SDN division.
− Understanding the basic
The company wants to hear your recommendation on the following: 1) How operations of a business
does the Company need to reorganize its departments in order to successfully − Perform moderate calculations
sell software? 2) Evaluate the go forward strategy for additional product − Read charts
offering.  Differentiation: creativity of
structure
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Question 1 cont’d next page

138


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
139
Initial
Structure
Analysis
140
Case 11: AlphaAuto

 Tell me about a time when you were in a stressful situation at work? How do Format: Interviewee‐led
you deal with stress? Difficulty level: 3/5
 What is the biggest risk for us in hiring you? Topic: New product
Industry: Automotive
− Market entry
Case Question
− Customer segmentation
− Pricing
Our client, Alpha Auto, is a large US‐based auto manufacturer that produces a
broad range of vehicles from compact cars to medium‐sized commercial trucks.
Alpha Auto emerged from bankruptcy in 2009 and it’s share in the US auto market Interviewer Guide
has declined from 11.2% to 9.5% over the past 3 years.  Keys to the case
With increasing consumer interest in electric vehicles, Alpha Auto wants to − Recognize that the electric vehicle
evaluate the option of expanding it’s product range to offer an electric or hybrid market, although growing rapidly,
is still a small fraction of the
vehicle. overall US auto market
− Target segment has to be aligned
The client wants our advise on how to evaluate this option. with client’s operations and
current positioning in the market
− Internalize exhibits/data and
eliminate non‐viable options using
strategic insights
INTERVIEWER ONLY
141
Case 11: AlphaAuto
Good candidate:
• Asks clarifying questions about
Additional Facts (provide if asked) Company’s ability to develop EV
technology
 Company‐specific:
• Asks about company’s current
• Financial health: Net income in 2014 was $1.2 billion. Cash at year’s end was $8.4 billion product lineup and brand
• Current product lineup: Consists of 3 brands
• Asks about electric vehicle
• Astra: Low to medium end luxury sedans, convertibles and minivans market, including size, growth,
• Neptune: Low end passenger, performance cars, crossovers and SUVs segments, and competitors
• Forge: Trucks and commercial vehicles
• Technology  Better candidate:
• R&D: Have developed technology to manufacture electric/hybrid power trains • Asks about company’s financial
• Have commitment from battery suppliers to provide batteries at all capacities position after bankruptcy
• Distribution: Network of dealerships across the US • Identifies that EV market is still
 US auto market very small and growth is subject to
risks
• Marketsizein 2014
• Total units (cars) sold in US: 8 million
NEXT STEP:
• Electric vehicles sold as percentage of total units: 1.5%
• Average price of vehicle in US ‐ $33,560 PROVIDE EXHIBIT 1, IF
• Average price of electric vehicle in US ‐ $40,025 CANDIDATE HAS NOT
• Electric vehicle market growth: provide exhibit 1 ALREADY ASKED FOR
• Electric vehicle segments: provide exhibit 2 MARKET DATA
• Competitors: provide exhibit 5
INTERVIEWER ONLY
142
Case 11: AlphaAuto
Electric vehicle unit sales forecast, US, 2015‐2020

1,000,000
800,000
800,000
600,000
600,000
400,000
400,000 300,000
200,000
200,000 100,000
0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Assuming ‐
1) Oil prices at $100 / barrel
2) Network of charging stations continues to
expand at current rate
Interviewer Guide
 Candidate should identify that EV market is forecasted to grow rapidly but is subject to some risks
 If candidate asks about impact of lower oil prices, state that some decrease in demand is expected
 If candidate asks about charging stations, state that they’re expected to grow at a constant rate
NEXT STEP: PROVIDE EXHIBIT 2
INTERVIEWER ONLY Handout 1 next page

143
Case 11: AlphaAuto: Handout 1
Electric vehicle unit sales forecast, US, 2015‐2020

900,000
800,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
400,000
300,000
300,000
200,000
200,000
100,000
100,000
0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Assuming ‐
1) Oil prices at $100 / barrel
2) Network of charging stations continues to
expand at current rate
144
Case 11: AlphaAuto
Segments % of EV market in 2014
Compact or mid‐sized family cars
Economy
Average price ‐ $32,000
75%
Premium features, higher‐end brand
Luxury
24%
High performance, usually two‐door
Sports 1%
Interviewer Guide
Ask candidate – “What factors should the client consider in selecting the target
segment?”
 Candidate should be able to provide several factors including – segment growth, profitability, price elasticity
within segment, competitor concentration, fit with client’s current brand, positioning, manufacturing
capabilities and distribution channels
 Good candidate will ask if percentage share of segments is expected to change in future. Can assume no
change in percentage
 Good candidate will realize that the economy segment is a better fit with the current brands owned by Alpha
Auto which skew towards the lower end.
 NEXT STEP: PROVIDE EXHIBIT 3
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Handout 2 next page

145
Electric Vehicle Segments % of EV market in 2014
Compact or mid‐sized family cars

Economy
75%
Premium features, higher‐end brand

Luxury
24%
High performance, usually two‐door

Sports
1%
146
Case 11: AlphaAuto
Sports Luxury Economy
High pricing Price $100,000 $70,000 $32,000
Market share 2.5% 5% 5%
Low pricing
Price $90,000 $55,000 $30,000
Market share 5% 10% 10%
Interviewer Guide
Ask candidate – “The client wants to target one segment. The table shows how much
market share they can capture within each segment if they set either a high price or
low price. Which segment and price level do you recommend?”
 It’s important for candidate to note that market share listed above is market share within the specific
segment
 Candidates can assume that market share will remain constant in subsequent years
 In order to estimate unit sales for client, candidate will have to refer to information in exhibits 1 and 2.
 Candidate should pick total forecast sales for EITHER 2018 or 2019 or 2020 to run any calculations (because
production capacity will not come online until 2018 (see Exhibit 4)
 Example calculation, total forecast unit sales in 2018 = 400,000 (from exhibit 1)
unit sales for economy segment in 2018 = 400,000 * 75% (from exhibit 2) = 300,000
unit sales for client = 300,000 * 5% (assuming high pricing) = 15,000
• A good candidate will ask for unit costs. If not, prompt candidates to think about costs before starting any
calculations.
 NEXT STEP: PROVIDE EXHIBIT 4 before candidate begins any calculations

INTERVIEWER ONLY 147
Case 11: AlphaAuto
Low pricing
Price $90,000 $55,000 $30,000
Interviewer Guide
 Units sold calculation for interviewer’s REFERENCE ONLY
 Candidates can pick one segment based on factors such as brand fit, price elasticity etc. and focus on that
 Some candidates might choose to run partial calculations across segments before deciding upon one.
 Note: candidate does NOT need to do these calculation for all years, but choose any ONE YEAR
 Good candidates will eliminate the Sports segment based on poor brand fit and low unit volume
Market share 2018 2019 2020
Total units sold forecast 100% 400,000 600,000 800,000
Sports segment units sold 1% 4,000 6,000 8,000
Luxury segment units sold 24% 96,000 144,000 192,000
Economy segment units sold 75% 300,000 450,000 600,000
Company units sold forecast Segment share 2018 2019 2020

Sports segment (high price) 2.5% 100 150 200
Sports segment (low price) 5% 200 300 400
Luxury segment (high price) 5% 4,800 7,200 9,600
Luxury segment (low price) 10% 9,600 14,400 19,200
Economy segment (high price) 5% 15,000 22,500 30,000
Economy segment (low price) 10% 30,000 45,000 60,000
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Handout 3 next page 148


within segment
Low pricing Price $90,000 $55,000 $30,000

within segment
149
Case 11: AlphaAuto
Option 1 Investment $1 Billion
• Retrofit existing Max capacity 50,000 units per year
production facility
Average unit cost $65,000 $50,000 $24,000

• Set up new Max capacity 100,000 units per year
production facility
Interviewer Guide
Ask candidate – “The client has two options to manufacture these electric vehicles. Which
one would you recommend? What criteria would you use?
 Good candidates will ask about operation expenses (OPEX) – state that OPEX will be 5% of sales in addition to the
unit costs. OPEX will be same across both options.
 Good candidates will bringup qualitative factors of choosing either option before jumping to any calculations.
 Option 1: lower capital requirements may limit exposure if EV market doesn’t realize growth expectations
 Option 2: higher production capacity provides room to scale in the future. Lower unit costs may lead to
higher return on invested capital (ROIC)
 Candidates should then proceed to calculate return on invested capital (ROIC) for either one or both production
options for their chosen segment
 Good candidates will eliminate the Sports segment based on poor brand fit and low unit volume. Direct candidates
to do so if they start running calculations on the sports segment
INTERVIEWER ONLY
150
Case 11: AlphaAuto
production facility

production facility
Interviewer Guide
 Candidates should calculate gross profits for the segment, pricing level & production option they have chosen.
 Some candidates might choose to run calculations for multiple pricing levels and options before selecting one
Segment share Price Cost Gross margin 2018 units sold 2018 gross profit
Luxury segment (high price, production option 1) 5% $70,000 $50,000 $20,000 4,800 $96,000,000
Luxury segment (low price, production option 1) 10% $50,000 $50,000 $0 9,600 $0
Luxury segment (high price, production option 2) 5% $70,000 $45,000 $25,000 4,800 $120,000,000
Luxury segment (low price, production option 2) 10% $50,000 $45,000 $5,000 9,600 $48,000,000
Economy segment (high price, production option 1) 5% $32,000 $24,000 $8,000 15,000 $120,000,000
Economy segment (low price, production option 1) 10% $30,000 $24,000 $6,000 30,000 $180,000,000
Economy segment (high price, production option 2) 5% $32,000 $22,000 $10,000 15,000 $150,000,000
Economy segment (low price, production option 2) 10% $30,000 $22,000 $8,000 30,000 $240,000,000
 Option highlighted in RED above will lead to highest ROI.

Gross profit = $180M, Operating expenses = 5% of sales = 5% * $900M = 45M, Net Income = $135M
ROIC = $135M / $1B = 13.5% in 2018
 Option highlighted in BLUE is also an acceptable answer if candidate justifies it with strategic factors
Gross profit = $240M, Operating expenses = $45M, Net Income = $195M, ROIC = $195M / $3B = 6.5% in 2018
INTERVIEWER ONLY: Handout 4 and 5 next page 151


production
facility Production start Beginning of 2018

production
facility Production start Beginning of 2018
152
Electric vehicle market share (US) in 2014

Others Tesna
15.20% 18.70%
Fode
15.60%
Missun
22.50%
Loyola
13.60%
CM
14.40%
153
Case 11: AlphaAuto: Conclusion (2 minutes max)
Suggested answer:
Alpha Auto should enter the electric vehicle market and target the economy segment.
Price should be set lower than the average price at $30,000 to capture 10% market share.
Retrofit existing production facility to manufacture electric vehicles
 Expanding product line to include electric vehicles will enable Alpha Auto to tap into a rapidly growing segment
within the overall auto market and strengthen the Alpha Auto brand
Risks, Caveats, and/or Next Steps
Risks
 Growth – Actual growth might end up lower than forecasts
 Pricing – competitors might reduce price putting pressure on Alpha Auto
 Technology – advances in technology by competitors may pose threats
 Regulatory changes – Tax benefits provided by the government might change
INTERVIEWER ONLY
154


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
155
Initial
Structure
Analysis
156
Case 12: Jamaican Land Investment
Case Question Case Overview
Our client is thinking about buying a piece of land in Format: Interviewee‐led
Difficulty level: 2/5
Jamaica for $3000 and has asked us to determine
Topic: Profitability
whether or not this is a good idea.
Industry: Agriculture
Concept(s) tested:
Information to be given upon request only − Profitability
•The price of the land is $3000 − Strategy analysis
•Total acreage: 10 acres
•Financial Target: $4,500 profit within first two years, excluding
$3000 purchase price
Interviewer Guide
•When prompted about use of land, ask candidate to brainstorm •It is important to let the
possibilities before giving him/her the answer: real estate candidate drive the case!
development, farming, hold and sell it once it appreciates, etc.) •The objective of the case is
• Land will be used for agriculture vague and ambiguity.
• Trees, Shrubs, Fruit, Exotic Flowers Candidates must spend time
•Cannot mix products (trees and shrubs) on same acre. Only one clarifying what exactly a
type of plant allowed per acre. “good idea” is in the eyes of
• Price per plant the client.
• Tree $50, Shrub $35, Fruit $15, Exotic $25
• Variable Cost per plant
• Tree $30, Shrub $25, Fruit $11, Exotic $17
INTERVIEWER ONLY
157
Information to be given upon request only (continued) Interviewer Guide
•Fixed Cost: $500 initial set up (first year only), $350 per year Good candidate:
for salaried labor Understands that this is a
• Market Demand per year profitability and needs to
•5000 Trees, 1000 shrubs, 1000 fruit, 2500 exotic ask many questions to get
the information needed
flowers Understands what
• Penetration rate: competitors cannot meet current demand. information they will need
•Competitors have 60% tree share, 20% shrub to answer the question as
it comes up
share, 85% fruit share, 90% exotic flower
share…the remaining shares can be captured by Better candidate:
our client. Lays out the steps to the
•How many plants can fit on an acre? When asked about how problem in advance;
knows how they will get
much of each plant can fit onto an acre, throw the question back to a number and the
and ask: “which plants do you think would have less of per acre?” information they need
(trees and shrubs b/c they take up a lot of room) before they start
Understands limit to
• 10 Trees/acre profitability is amount of
• 25 Shrubs/acre acres you own
• 75 Fruit/acre
• 50 Exotic Flowers/acre
INTERVIEWER ONLY
158
Market Size/Est. Demand Margins Per Unit Profitability Per Acre
Demand P‐C=Profit per unit # of units per acre x profit per unit
Market Size x Client Penetration Rate $50‐$30= $20 per Tree 10 trees per acre x $20= $200/acre
•5000 trees x 40%= 2000 units $35‐$25= $10 per Shrub 25 shrubs per acre x $10=
•1000 shrubs x 80%= 800 units $250/acre
•1000 fruit x 15%= 150 units
$15‐$11= $4 per Fruit
75 fruit per acre x $4= $300/acre
•2500 exotic x 10%= 250 units $25‐$17= $8 per Exotic
50 exotic flowers per acre x $8=
Supply $400/acre
*Client’s capability to meet estimated
demand is dependent on the number
of acres it has (10 acres)
Possible follow‐up and guidance Possible follow‐up and guidance Possible follow‐up and guidance
to interviewer to interviewer to interviewer
To make the case more challenging, ask:
# of units per acre x profit per unit 5 acres of Exotic Flowers x
‐How would you price each unit? (cost
10 trees per acre x $20= $200/acre $400/acre=$2000
based pricing, look at competitors
25 shrubs per acre x $10= $250/acre 2 acres of fruit x $300= $600
prices, price by segment (premium
75 fruit per acre x $4= $300/acre 3 acres of shrubs x $250= $750
supermarkets vs. fruit stands, etc.)
50 exotic flowers per acre x $8= Y1: $3,350‐500‐350= $2,500 (do not
‐If demand was there, would you use
$400/acre include $3000 investment)
all 10 acres for exotic flowers? Why or
Y2: $3, 350‐$350= 3000
why not?
Total Profit For First Two Years:
(important to diversify products!)
$5,500
INTERVIEWER ONLY
159
Clarify the Problem
Interviewee should always spend time clarifying the objective(s)
upfront. Find out what the land will be used for, how many acres, financial target of client,
etc. in order to come up with a more precise structure and to avoid stumbling later on in the
case.
Determine Demand & Assign Plants To # of Acres Based on Profitability

Interviewee should determine total demand of each product and the client’s penetration rate
(market share that client can grab). After finding estimated demand, interviewee should look
to assign each type of plant to a specific number of acres. This involves figuring out the margins
per unit, the profitability per acre of each plant (most profitable plants get first priority in
acre assignments), and how many plants can fit onto an acre.
Determine If Investment Would Meet Client’s Financial Target
Once interviewee assigns plants to a specific number of acres, he/she should calculate the total
profitability for the first two years. Interviewee should take into account the fixed costs for
each year. Running the numbers, he/she will find that the investment will exceed the client’s
financial target of $4,500
INTERVIEWER ONLY
160
Recommendation (Answer First) Interviewer Guide
“My recommendation to our client is to invest in the Jamaican •Before calculating the
property. My calculations show that we would achieve $5,500 in figures, it’s always a good
profit within the first two years, exceeding our client’s financial idea to tell the
target by $1,000.” interviewer what you’re
going to do next.
Risks •Remember to label your
units and keep your math
“Before making a final decision, however, I would look into the neat. Use as
growth rate and expected demand for these agricultural much paper as necessary.
products, and any risks from natural disasters such as hurricanes, •Once you arrive at a figure,
Risks drought, plant diseases, etc.” step back and explain what
the number means for the
benefit of both you and the
Next Steps interviewer.
“At this point in time though, given my calculations, investing in

this land looks like a great idea.”

161


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
162
Initial
Structure
Analysis
163
Case 13: Avicenna Health
 Tell me about a time you had to optimize two or more competing variables, what Format: Interviewee‐led
was the result? What would you have done differently?
Topic: Competitive Response
Industry: Healthcare
(Payer/Provider)
Case Question − Market Analysis
− Opportunity Assessment
Our client is Avicenna Health, a major healthcare payer in the Chicagoland area.
Avicenna Health recently purchased a large hospital system in order to compete
with a former strategic partner, University Medical Center (UMC), one of the best Interviewer Guide
hospital systems in the nation. The client believes that as a provider and payer, it
will be better positioned for the future of healthcare which will focus on value of
− Recognize that toe‐toe
care, rather than volume. Nonetheless, our client is concerned about the competition with UMC is a losing
profitability of its hospitals today and in the future, since the majority of patients strategy
are choosing UMC. What should the client do to position itself more successfully − Propose creative methods for
driving patients into Avicenna
in the short and long‐term?
− Evaluate most attractive non‐
hospital sites of care
Additional Information (if asked): Payer=healthcare insurance company, provider=  Recommendation is to reduce
hospital or healthcare setting, value=reimbursement based on quality and value of hospital by driving
appropriateness of care, volume=reimbursement based on quantity of care. members to non‐hospital sites
of care
INTERVIEWER ONLY164
164
Case 13: Avicenna Health: Framework Development
What should the client do to position itself more successfully in the short and long‐term?
Expect the candidate will make framework to structure relevant info. Interviewer Guide

 Creates a framework that logically
orders thinking
Evaluation and Next  Correctly applies healthcare and
Market Landscape Opportunities develop specific opportunities
Steps
evaluated against meaningful
Industry Trends Short Term Evaluation
criteria
• Consolidation in payers • Marketing Campaign • Criteria and scorecard for  Asks for or makes reasonable
and providers due to • Poach UMC Talent each opportunity in ST estimates to calculate most
reduced reimbursement Medium/Long Term and LT attractive Non hospital service
for high volume services • Build Hospitals • Calculate most attractive
Local Competition • Cut UMC out of non‐hospital service  Better candidate:
• UMC has world renowned Network • Needs to estimate  Supports each bucket with specific
physicians and cancer • Non‐hospital services population of
qualifying facts
facilities • Home Health Chicagoland (~10
• 80% of population and • Hospice Care million)  Generates specific opportunities
70% of Avicenna • Infusion Next Steps that cover short and medium term
insurance members go to • Nurse Facilities • Recommendation with opportunities
UMC • Etc. risks associated with best  Develops second level insights with
Regulation options exhibit calculation with minimal
• National and state focus is prodding (see exhibit calculation
on value based care,
slide)
reducing reimbursement
for re‐hospitalization and
excessive care
INTERVIEWER ONLY
165
Case 13: Avicenna Health: Handout
Table of Non‐Hospital Sites of Care
Site of Care Target demographic Relative Hospital Replacement Average cost

Utilization rate of service
Home Health Age 65+ High 60% $500
chronically ill
Hospice Age 65+ Low 10% $800
terminally ill
Infusion All Very Low 5% $2000
Nurse Age 65+ Medium 80% $1000
Facilities chronically ill
166
Case 13: Avicenna Health
Table of Non‐Hospital Sites of Care
Site of Target Relative Hospital Average Calculation Result
Care demographic Utilization Replacement cost of
rate service
Home Age 65+ High 60% $500 20%*100% $60/person
Health chronically ill (100%) *60%*$500
(20%)
Hospice Age 65+ Low (50%) 10% $800 5%*50%*1 $2/person
terminally ill 0%*$800
(5%)
Infusion All (100%) Very Low 5% $2000 100%*25% $80/person
(25%) *5%*$2000
Nurse Age 65+ Medium 80% $1000 20%*50%* $80/person

Facilities chronically ill (50%) 80%*$1000
(20%)
Second Level Insight: Infusion is most attractive site of care since it is least capital intensive
and represents the highest revenue per service
INTERVIEWER ONLY
167
Case 13: Avicenna Health Conclusion
Suggested answer:
(GOOD) Avicenna should avoid competing directly with UMC by leveraging its insurance
position and building non‐hospital services
(BETTER) Avicenna should acquire high quality infusion capabilities to drive customers away
from UMC in the short and medium term, while reducing the role of hospitals across all
services in the long term
 Infusion represents the least capital intensive and highest revenue per service
 Risks of reducing hospital traffic at owned facilities, may need to change the role
 Expect a competitive response from UMC, create long term strategy to loyalty to Avicenna
INTERVIEWER ONLY
168


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
169
Initial
Structure
Analysis
170
Case 14: Down Under
 Tell me about a time when you failed. Format: Interviewer‐led
 Tell me about another time when you failed. Topic: Business analysis/ strategy
Industry: Retail
− Company Analysis
Case Question − Increase in revenue
Our client is Down Under Apparel an Australian based swim wear and lifestyle
company. The company unexpectedly missed its internal earnings target. The
CEO has called on your firm to diagnose the problem Interviewer Guide
− identifying why Down Under missed
it’s earnings forecast
− Understanding the client and industry
− Ability to distinguish between concept
forecast vs actuals
− Data segmentation
− Evaluate risks and challenges
Solution: The client missed earning
forecast due to selling 2m fewer
surfboards/ surf equipment at surf
shops
INTERVIEWER ONLY171
171
Case 14: Down Under
Information to be given upon request only (continued) Interviewer Guide
Competitors:
•The client competes against a different competitor set depending on the product. Good candidate:
Maui is the largest rival in the surf and athletic swim wear, but offered lower quality Understands that this is a
products at lower price points. performance analysis
•The client has no interest in growth through competitor acquisition case and needs to ask
Customers: many questions to get the
information needed
•Surfers and Professional Athletes (30% of Revenue): Willing to pay for performance, Understands what
yet low earnings for the average surfer suggests limits to what they will pay information they will need
•Luxury Seekers (70% of revenue): Fastest Growing segment, contributing to the to answer the question as
explosive growth. These are casual users who enjoy the performance but not a key to it comes up
buying process. Value the brand and ascetics. Brand offers legitimacy.
Better candidate:
Channel: Prepares a clear
•Surf Shops: Typically small independent retailers located in beach towns. Client has structure or framework
long standing relationships and entry point for any given market. Carry limited to organize
merchandise due to small locations, almost exclusively performance wear. brainstorming
•Big Box Retailers: Products at targeted price points to appeal to their customers. Demonstrates executive
Typically more price sensitive customers. Offers a wide variety of performance wear presence, describes the
and equipment (boards, beach equipment etc.), some lifestyle products. Frequent problem, and proposes
a solution
Sales
•Department Stores: Least price sensitive customers. Offer variety of products
focusing on lifestyle wear. Only channel outside online offering “resort collection”.
•Direct to Consumer (Online): Attracts repeat customers who are already familiar
with brand and products. Never puts anything on sale.
INTERVIEWER ONLY
172
Case 14: Down Under
What should the client do to course correct and achieve its projected earnings forecast?
Expect the candidate will make framework to structure relevant info. Redirect candidate that Interviewer Guide
immediately requests data to learn more about the client.

 Creates a framework that logically
orders thinking
Analyze business Recommendation  Identifies the reason for missed
Brainstorm solutions earnings
performance and Next Steps
 Recaps the case and delivers fact
based recommendations on the
• Provided earnings data when If the candidate does not • Propose options to increase
switch to “solutioning,” then sales (e.g., introduce surf best course of action for Down
asked
guide with the following equipment into new Under
• Provide forecast details and
question: how could the channels, developed
sales information exhibits
when candidate asks for a
client increase sales? actionable steps to increase  Better candidate:
breakdown of either the Good response
sales with surf shops,  Supports each recommendation
increase product with specific qualifying risks and
sales or cost information considerations:
consideration, etc.)
• If candidate does not , then • Tailor to the customer next steps
direct to form a hypothesis: experience instead of sales • Identify other  Quickly draws insights between
Missed surf equipment overall considerations/ challenges exhibits to identify the source of
forecast at surf shops is the • Acknowledge but not focus (lack of channel and the problem
issue on other ways to increase consume awareness of
sales (e.g., working with product, movement away
• Direct candidate to validate the vendor, product from core competencies,
hypothesis through modification, etc.) long term impact to brand)
understanding cost • Outline potential
information challenges, risk, or other
considerations
INTERVIEWER ONLY
173
Case 14: Down Under
Forecast
Expect Profit = $1,100M
Sales by Year Actual Profit= $500M Costs by Year
$14,000 $14,000
$12,000 $12,800 $12,000

$12,000
$11,700 $11,500
$10,000 $10,000
$9,300 $9,500
$8,900 $9,000
$8,000 $8,350 $8,000
$8,000 $7,800
$7,500
$6,000 $6,000
$4,000 $4,000
$2,000 $2,000
$‐ $‐
2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014
Note: in millions ($) Forecast Actual Forecast Actuals

Approximate figures
Interviewer Guide
Always provide this exhibit before forecast details exhibit, even if the candidate asks for more specific information
Candidate should compare expected sales and costs to determine expected earnings = $1,100 million

Case 14: Down Under
Forecast Details
2014 Sales Forecast by Channel and Category
Big Box Department Online Surf Shops Total
Beach Attire $1,000 $800 $480 $400 $2,680
Casual Swim $1,400 $870 $580 $435 $3,285
Professional Swim $400 $0 $360 $800 $1,560
Resort Wear $1,050 $1,100 $450 $675 $3,275
Surf Equipment $400 $0 $0 $1,600 $2,000

Total $4,250 $2,770 $1,870 $3,910 $12,800
2014 Projected Units Sold by Channel and Category

Beach Attire 8 6 4 3 21
Casual Swim 11 6 4 3 24
Professional Swim 3 0 2 4 9
Resort Wear 7 6 3 4 20
Surf Equipment 1 0 0 4 5
Total 30 18 13 18 79
Note: in millions
Interviewer Guide
 Only provide if the candidate proposes to break down the information on exhibit 1
Case 14: Down Under
Sales by Category (actuals)
Average Price by Category (2014)
Net Sales by Category 2014 Actual Sales = Beach Attire $128
$12,000 million
$2,600
Casual Swim $134
$800M sold at Surf
2012
$1,600
$2,100
Shops/ $400 average Professional Swim $173
price for surf
$2,000
equipment = 2M Resort Wear $163
units sold Surf Equipment $400
$3,050 Compares this
$1,700
information to data Margin by Category
2013 $2,550
sheet 2 and
$2,200
determine only 50%
of units sold Casual Swim 4%
$3,480 compared to 2014

forecast Professional Swim 8%
$1,800
2014 $3,000
$2,520 Resort Wear 11%
$1,200
Beach Attire 6%
$‐ $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000
Surf Equipment 20%

Casual Swim Professional Swim Resort Wear
Beach Attire Surf Equipment 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Note: in millions ($)
Interviewer Guide
The candidate should notice Surf Equipment is new. After making the observation, provide the following information:
• Surf Equipment is a recently launched category
• Products include Surf Boards, primarily at Surf Shops
• Sold $800 million at Surf Shops this year
Information confirms that costs are inline with expectations and costs are not a problem

Case 14: Down Under
Cost Information (actuals)
Average Cost by Category Other Information
$350
• Down Under’s offers free shipping for Direct
to Customer sales due to competitive
$300
pressures
$250
$120 • Down Under is opening a new
manufacturing and distribution center and
consideration 3 sites:
$200
$40 - Southern California
$150 $60
- Mexico
$70
$20 $43
$60
$100 $15 $36
- Guatemala
$10
$15 $30 $12
$15
$50 $10 $30 • Five years ago, Down Under relocated many
$50
$20 $20 $20 of its manufacturing facilities to South Asia
$60
$30 $40 $35 $30
from Australia boosting long term
$‐ profitability
Casual Swim Professional Surf Beach Attire Resort Wear
Swim Equipment • FY 2014 costs are approximately the same
Materials Labor Marketing Shipping SG&A as FY 2013 costs
Interviewer Guide
 Candidate should identify the following from the provided data:
• Higher marketing costs as a percentage of overall costs due to recent product launch
• Costs are not the main issue
Case 14: Down Under Handout
Forecast
Sales by Year Costs by Year

$14,000 $14,000
$12,800
$12,000 $12,000
$12,000
$11,700
$11,500
$10,000 $10,000
$9,500
$9,300
$8,900 $9,000
$8,000 $8,350 $8,000
$8,000
$7,800
$7,500
$6,000 $6,000
$4,000 $4,000
$2,000 $2,000
$‐ $‐
2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014
Forecast Actual Forecast Actuals
178
Forecast Details
2014 Sales Forecast by Channel and Category
Beach Attire $1,000 $800 $480 $400 $2,680
Casual Swim $1,400 $870 $580 $435 $3,285
Professional Swim $400 $0 $360 $800 $1,560
Resort Wear $1,050 $1,100 $450 $675 $3,275
Surf Equipment $400 $0 $0 $1,600 $2,000

Total $4,250 $2,770 $1,870 $3,910 $12,800
2014 Projected Units Sold by Channel and Category

Beach Attire 8 6 4 3 21
Casual Swim 11 6 4 3 24
Professional Swim 3 0 2 4 9
Resort Wear 7 6 3 4 20
Surf Equipment 1 0 0 4 5
Total 30 18 13 18 79
Note: in millions
179
Sales by Category (actuals)

Net Sales by Category Average Price by Category (2014)
Beach Attire $128
$2,600
Casual Swim $134
$1,600
2012 $2,100 Professional Swim $173

$2,000 Resort Wear $163
Surf Equipment $400
$3,050
$1,700
Margin by Category
2013 $2,550
$2,200
Casual Swim 4%
Professional Swim 8%
$3,480
Resort Wear 11%
$1,800
2014 $3,000 Beach Attire 6%
$2,520
Surf Equipment 20%
$1,200
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
$‐ $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000
Casual Swim Professional Swim Resort Wear Beach Attire Surf Equipment
180
Cost Information (actuals)
Average Cost by Category Other Information
$350
• Down Under’s offers free shipping for Direct
to Customer sales due to competitive
$300 pressures
$120
• Down Under is opening a new
$250 manufacturing and distribution center and
consideration 3 sites:
$200 - Southern California

$40
- Mexico
$60
$150
- Guatemala
$70
$20
$100
$60 $43
• Five years ago, Down Under relocated many
$15 $36
$10 of its manufacturing facilities to South Asia
$15 $30 $12 from Australia boosting long term
$50 $30
$15 $10
$50 profitability
$20
$20 $20
$60
$30
$40 $35 $30
• FY 2014 costs are approximately the same
$‐ as FY 2013 costs
Casual Swim Professional Surf Beach Attire Resort Wear
Swim Equipment
Materials Labor Marketing Shipping SG&A

181
Case 14: Down Under Conclusion
Suggested answer:
(GOOD) Down Under missed its earnings forecast due to lower than expected sales of Surf
Equipment at Surf Shops.
(BETTER) Down Under missed its earnings forecast due to lower than expected sales of Surf
Equipment at Surf Shops. The new product launch into a tangential category proved
challenging for down under. The candidate should summarize strategies to increase sales
and identify considerations/ challenges to proposed strategies
INTERVIEWER ONLY


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
183
Initial
Structure
Analysis
184
Case 15: Otobea Furniture Company
Potential Behavioral Pre‐Case Questions
 Tell me about a time when you failed.
 Tell me about another time when you failed.
Case Question
Our client is Otobea Furniture Company. Otobea is based in Europe and designs luxury furniture for homes. Otobea’s design
studio, showroom and manufacturing center are all located in Germany. They are the 2nd largest player in the Eurozone, with 39%
market share. Otobea is currently considering entering the Indian market.
• Based on market analysis, there is a growing market in India for similarly designed furniture. There is another European
competitor that is also preparing to enter the Indian market
• Otobea’s goal is to get the same market share in terms of volume as in Europe with 25% lower market prices
• There are 3 possible expansion options:
• Ship (continue to manufacture in Germany but sell in India),
• Build (manufacture and sell in India),
• Acquire (acquire a local Indian company that is 50% the size of European operations)
KEY QUESTION: SHOULD OTOBEA FURNITURE CO. ENTER THE INDIAN MARKET?
• How profitable is Otobea? What is the profit potential of the Indian market?
185
Sample Framework STEPS OF A CASE INTERVIEW

Economics Time Customer Risk
Relationships 1. Structuring the problem:
• Understand the case

situation and
complication
• Cost to ship from • How long to get • How well can • Does the • Ask clarifying questions
Germany to India to the 28% you meet Indian distance create • Use a simple and
• Cost of setting target market customer needs? quality issues relevant framework to
up sales and share? (e.g. breakages)
Ship distribution • Is there a viable
guide the discussion
center in India path to the • Confirm/formulate key
target? question(s)
• Cost of investing • How long does it How well can you • Can you find the
on a plant and take to become meet Indian right resources Guidance for Interviewer:
distribution relevant? customer needs? in India to be The best candidates will
Build center successful? focus on the calculations but
also weave in qualitative
concerns, e.g.
• How fast can they enter
• Base line • Is there a target? • How does • Risks associated the market?
economics? • How fast can it acquisition affect with integration • Relative riskiness of the
• Cost of be acquired? customer and culture
acquisition relationships clashes
three options
Acquire premium? • Effect on customer
relationships
e
INTERVIEWER ONLY
186
KEY DATA (to be provided based on clarifying questions) STEPS OF A CASE INTERVIEW
• Otobea sells 350K pieces of furniture per year
• Average price of furniture is $900
2. Solving the problem:
• Profit (EBITDA) margin is 30%
Otobea market • European market is $800M in annual revenues; Otobea Develop hypothesis
has 39% market share (OK to round to 40%) Demonstrate quant skills
data • Indian market is the same size but prices are 25% lower Refine hypothesis
• If Otobea enters the market, they can get to full
potential within 2 years (350K pieces) and halfway there • Drive the discussion via
in 1 year (175K) your hypothesis
• Break the complex
• Furniture market in India is highly fragmented but there problem into its
Acquisition is one large target called Hatil that can be acquired component parts
• Hatil currently sells 200K furniture with ~$40M EBITDA… • Share your assumptions
Costs but can grow to 350K pieces. (Purchase price is 3‐5x out loud
EBITDA) • Identify and dig into
drivers that matter
• Cost to ship within Europe is $100 per piece. Cost to ship
Manufacturing / outside Europe is $150 and takes 2 weeks
• Use a simplified analytic
• Cost to build sales / distribution operations in India has
approach to quantify
distribution one time cost of $5M
values and solve the case
costs • Cost to build a manufacturing facility is $5M
Otobea is planning a 1 year time frame on any investment due to market pressure
INTERVIEWER ONLY
187
PROFIT POTENTIAL OF INDIAN MARKET (CALCULATION KEY): STEPS OF A CASE INTERVIEW
Number of pieces of furniture sold (same as U.S.) = 350K 2. Solving the problem:
Prices in the U.S. = $900 per piece
Develop hypothesis
European Revenue = $315M Demonstrate quant skills
Margin (30%) = $94.5M (round to ~$95M) Refine hypothesis
Prices in India (25% lower) • Drive the discussion via

Indian market profit potential ~ $95 x 0.75 = $70M your hypothesis
• Break the complex
problem into its
component parts
• Share your assumptions
out loud
• Identify and dig into
drivers that matter
• Use a simplified analytic
approach to quantify
values and solve the case
INTERVIEWER ONLY
188
Sample hypothesis‐driven discussion STEPS OF A CASE INTERVIEW

Hypothesis: Indian market is attractive; best long term option for entry is
likely to build, but the acquisition allows Otobea to be relevant now Guidance for Interviewer:
• The best candidates will
touch on at least 2/3rds
of these insights or bring
Ship Build Acquire up additional insights
not captured in this
sample
• Shipping will be costly • Start‐up costs of $10M • The acquisition premium
and come out of margin ($5M + $5M) are low must be recouped
(not price) relative to the “prize” • Premium is likely much
• Customer needs can’t be $54M of run rate higher than the cost of
met as efficiently given EBITDA) distribution ($5M) and
longer shipping times • No impact on margin manufacturing ($5M)
• Not a viable option (like ship) • While you start selling
relative to building if • Shows commitment and immediately, you are
building isn’t too responsiveness to only able to generate
expensive, which it market incremental profits that
doesn’t seem to be (only • Speed is important but come from the
$5M despite run rate worth it to go slower difference of your
profits of $54M) • Some execution risk, as ultimate market share
• Slow start for sales, will there is the risk of not (~30%) and their current
take time to develop understanding the market share.
distribution channels market (customers, • Very high integration risk
distribution) • Changes the balance
sheet (debt)
INTERVIEWER ONLY
189
Calculations related to each option: STEPS OF A CASE INTERVIEW

Hypothesis: Indian market is attractive; best long term option for entry is
likely to build, but the acquisition allows Otobea to be relevant now Guidance for Interviewer:
• The best candidates will
identify that the
numbers are most
Ship Build Acquire attractive for the build
option but also discuss
the qualitative concerns
around speed
# of pieces sold over 2 years # of pieces sold over 2 years Hatil EBITDA:
175K, 350K 175K, 350K $40M
Margin over two years: Margin over two years: EBITDA multiple (3‐5x)
$35M, $70M $35M, $70M Assume 4x
Incremental shipping costs: Up‐front cost (Plant + Sales) Acquisition price:

$50 per piece $10M $160M
Shipping cost over 2 years: Total costs over 2 years: Margin over 2 years:
$9M, $17.5M $10M $40M, $70M
Up‐front costs (Sales/dist)

$5M
Total costs over 2 years:

$14M, $17.5M
INTERVIEWER ONLY
190
For the recommendation, refer back to the original framework STEPS OF A CASE INTERVIEW
Economics Time Customer Risk
Relationships 3. Recommend a solution
• Proactively get to an
answer
• Tie together the pieces
• Shipping eats • Still needs to • Build your • Does the of analysis into a
~25% of margin build distribution relationships but distance create coherent answer
/ customers always be any quality • Recommend a practical
which will take “European” issues?
Ship time • Issue with being
course of action to
responsive due achieve results
to shipping time • Demonstrate
understanding of
• Best economics • Still needs to • Build • Starting with a business sensitivities
since startup build dist / relationships manufacturing
costs are low customers which from scratch facility is
Build will take time • Can say company difficult… could Guidance for Interviewer:
• May be easier is truly an Indian fail or cost more The best candidates will
than “ship” since company
you are local refer back to the original
framework to form their
• Premium is high, • Immediate • Brings • Big integration / recommendation
given 5 year revenues and relationships, culture risk
timeframe relevance but some issues • People could
• Very fast transitioning leave and take
Acquire them to the new customers with
company them
INTERVIEWER ONLY
191
KEY RECOMMENDATIONS: STEPS OF A CASE INTERVIEW
• Build sales and manufacturing capability in India and don’t 3. Recommending a solution
acquire Hatil; the much greater profit opportunity and lower
• Proactively get to an
upfront costs with building outweigh the speed constraint answer
• Is the speed constraint even real? Many companies feel the • Tie together the pieces
need to go fast but is unclear what the risk / cost is of going of analysis into a
slower coherent answer
• Be willing to “overspend” to grow market faster, since there • Recommend a practical
course of action to
is so much profit potential achieve results
• Consider much smaller acquisition if you can’t get a foothold • Demonstrate
with European distribution or customers understanding of
business sensitivities
Guidance for Interviewer:

The best candidates will
refer back to the original
framework to form their
recommendation
INTERVIEWER ONLY
192
Other ideas / topics / creative solutions: STEPS OF A CASE INTERVIEW
• Possibility of doing a smaller deal than Hatil to get access Guidance for Interviewer:
Challenge the interviewee
rapidly but also preserve the long‐term economics of with additional creative
building questions after they present
• Should we use the same brand in Europe and India? their recommendation. This
can be used to test the
• Do we use the same go to market strategy in India as in interviewee’s ability to think
Europe? Maybe it is less/more distributor based? on her feet and react to
• What if we go to low cost manufacturing outside of unexpected questions.
Europe/India?
• Should we think about attacking other segments?
• Does it make sense to acquire the other European
competitor?
• Since there is a “fashion” element, does this make the whole
expansion much more risky?
• What happens if Hatil gets aggressive to prevent us from
entering the market?
INTERVIEWER ONLY
193


Initial
Relevant framework
Structure

Analysis
so what
Answer first
What’s next

Consulting
Engaging style
194
Initial
Structure
Analysis
195

Haas 2017-2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Haas 2017-2018

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Haas 2017-2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BERKELEY‐HAAS

FALL 2017 – SPRING 2018

• This guide is meant to supplement your consulting

• While studying how to do cases and identifying best

• When using this guide (and other resources), always

1) Management consulting recruiting process

Get the interview Ace the interview

• Build consulting‐tailored • Prepare for the case interview

Value addition Communication Team

• Structured thinking • Crystalizing the • Cultural fit

• Invest time tailoring to consulting

• Key items to research:

• Above all be genuine in your interactions

Networking is more art than science ‐ not hard to be good, but

• Case: Practice, practice, practice

• Behavioral / Experience Interview: PARs*

• Other: Keeping up with pleasantries

Indicative internship recruiting & preparation timeline

*Plan to interview the week before classes begin

Sept Oct / Nov Dec Winter Break Jan / Feb

• This is a long‐term project; invest time upfront designing a good plan!

• Procrastination is costly. Consider making an “interview prep” buddy as

Indicative full‐time recruiting & preparation timeline

• Draft resume • Get invites • 1st rd. interviews by

Summer / Aug Sep / Oct Oct / Nov

• This is an aggressive timeline.

Intro / Case Questions

• Your job search is too important to leave managing it exclusively to yourself!

• Your goal isn’t to work hard preparing; it is to actually improve

1) Management consulting recruiting process

• Requires you to describe what you • Requires you to solve a problem

• Demonstrates “story‐telling” skills

Interviewee Interviewer Other

Interviewee‐led Interviewer led Written

First Round Second Round

• Interviewer: managers • Partners, senior managers

Regular case Solely behavioral Presentation Comments

• Can use group case

• Uses brain teasers

Getting started Running the case Wrapping it up

• Use of paper • Structured • Answer the

Getting started Running the case Wrapping it up

• Use of paper • Structured • Answer the

4) Firms often offer to do a mock

• School case books (HCC Website)

3 Final case prep is about polish,

2 Later cases are about seeing more variety

Make sure you are practicing

Quality Cases Done

• Some people get started late and don’t have

• Some people have invested a lot in case prep

• They know cases cold but sometimes nerves

• Some people do a ton of cases – but do low

incremental improvement at each stage of

Have a structured approach Have a structured approach

Depth Get the most from every case

Always remember what you are solving for

Why use a case log?

• Helps you keep track of your performance over time

Behavioral answer _:_ min Date:

Behavioral answer _:_ min Date: