Lecture 6
Lecture 6
Lecture 6
net/publication/304659098
CITATIONS READS
0 2,914
5 authors, including:
Uma Shankar
Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, Ja…
97 PUBLICATIONS 322 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Pradeep Singh on 01 July 2016.
31
Integrated Disease Management of
Field Crops under Hill Agro-Ecosystem
The global importance of cereal crops to the human diet and moreover to
the written history of man and agriculture cannot be overstated. Cereal grains
are the fruit of plants belonging to the grass family (Gramineae) most important
group of food crops produced in the world. Nutritionally, they are important
sources of dietary protein, carbohydrates, complex vitamin B, vitamin E, iron,
trace of minerals, and fiber. It has been estimated that global cereal
consumption directly provides about 50 per cent of protein and energy
necessary for the human diet. Some cereals, notably wheat, contain proteins
that form gluten, which is essential for making bread. Major cereal crops
produced worldwide include wheat, rice and maize. Wheat, rice, maize,
sorghum, and millet are produced in large quantities in India.
clearly that it is an important sub-system and interacts with other such systems
that fall under the cropping system.
Surveillance of Disease
Surveillance of crop health is an important component of integrated
disease management system. Disease surveillance includes the monitoring of
disease prevalence and severity. Surveillance helps in the identification of
potentially important diseases in early stage of development. Surveillance
focuses primarily on decision making for the selection of proper timing of
pesticide application and prevents from unnecessary uses of chemical in the
agriculture system. Thus surveillance, along with other logistic support, may
be an effective and important tool of disease forecasting.
Resistant Cultivars
The use of resistant varieties may be the main component in disease control
in several crops. Varietal replacement provides a spatial and temporal
discontinuity of susceptible host against the pathogen. This approach reduces
the disease severity and the extent of the losses. The use of resistant varieties
is the cheapest, safest and the most effective approach of plant disease
management. The important resistant varieties developed to counter the
diseases epidemics of various crop shown in Table 1.
Gene Deployment
Gene deployment strategies are applicable for long distance spreading of
diseases like the black, brown and yellow rusts of wheat, rice tungro disease
and several other pathogens. The spatial and temporal deployment of resistant
genes has immensely benefited India in many crops diseases including the
wheat diseases.
Cultural Control
The proper and judicious use of fertilizers or nutrients, sowing time
adjustment, proper soil and water management, crop rotation, sanitation and
proper weed management help in reducing the losses due to different diseases
and resulting better yield.
Avoidance of Pathogen
Smut and ergot of bajra are more severe in wet areas where rain occurs
for longer period during the flowering stage of the crop. A number of soil
borne diseases can be prevented if the same crop is not grown in the same
field year after year.
Crop Rotation
Crop rotation helps to control many soil borne diseases, such as wilts of
arhar and linseed, smut of bajra, bunt of wheat and root rot of vegetables
crops (Table 2).
Sanitation
Field sanitation is another effective tool for controlling diseases. Burning
of disease stubbles or previous crop refuse is common practice in this method.
Removal of crop debris and the irrigation water regulation from fields with
disease crops also help in reducing the number of primary inoculum and
further spread of the disease. This method is found very effective in case of
soil borne diseases, caused by species of Fusarium sp., Verticillium sp., Rhizoctonia
sp., Sclerotium sp. and Sclerotinia sp.
Rogueing
Roguing of diseased is used for management of simple interest type of
disease as loose smut of wheat, yellow vein mosaic of okra, panama disease
of banana etc. This is the practice of careful removal and destruction of infected
plants or plant parts from the field at an early stage which minimize the foci
of infection and preventing wide spread of pathogen.
Trap Crops
Decoy or trap crop are the non host crops which are sown with the main
crop with the purpose of reduction of inoculum potential of soil borne
pathogens. This is achieved by stimulating the dormant propagules of the
pathogens in the absence of the host.
or restricting the import of plant and plant materials, insects, fungi etc. to
India from foreign countries.
Biological Control
The natural mortality of the pathogen by parasites, predators or competitor
fungus is the most important way to minimize the pest outbreaks. The use of
natural parasites, predators or competitor fungus is another important
component of IDM, which can be useful in managing the pathogens and
crop diseases. In this method of disease control care has to be taken so that
the organism used for control of the pathogen should not be pathogenic to
crop concerned or to the other crops that are likely to be grown in the cropping
sequence. The example of antagonistic micro-organism enlisted in Table 3.
Transgenic Plants
Biotechnological approach provides a new tool in plant disease
management through the resistant genes transfer into agronomically superior
genotypes for the management of diseases. For the management of viral
diseases coat protein mediated resistance appears to be very promising.
Chitinase gene of plant and bacterial origin has also been introduced into
Rhizobium meliloti, Pseudomonas flourescencs. These bacteria, colonizing around
the roots carrying the chitinase gene and suppresses wilt disease caused by
Fusarium oxysporum. Cloning of plant defense genes conferring resistance to
varieties of bacteria, fungal and virus diseases has need urgent attention for
management of crop diseases. Transfer of Xa-24 gene of Oryza longistaminata
to rice cultivars which confer resistance against different races of bacterial
blight.
602 Ecologically Based Integrated Pest Management
Wheat Rusts
The three important rust diseases occurs on wheat viz., stem or black
rust (Puccinia graminis Pers. f. Sp. tritici Schof.), leaf or brown rust (Puccinia
recondita Rob. ex. Desm. F. sp. tritici ) and stripe or yellow rust (Puccinia
striiformis West). Rust diseases are responsible for causing huge economics
losses. In India leaf rust are most important diseases and prevalent all over
the country. The disease in north-western region appears in late January and
assumes epidemic growth rate in the month of February- march when the
crop is in anthesis or grain filling stage but in case of stem rust it is mainly
prevalent in central and peninsular region of country but it appear very late
with low intensity in the northern belt. Stripe rust is restricted only in northern
parts of the country particularly in foot hills of Himalayas and adjoining plains
of north-western region. Spores of both Puccinia recondita f. sp. Brown and P.
striiformis (yellow rust of wheat) are thought to be primarily dispersed by
wind and rainfall has the potential to spread both brown rust and yellow
rust of wheat (Geagea et al., 2000).
Rust diseases are responsible for huge economics losses. In 1972-73, stem
and stripe rust which appears in epidemic form in Punjab, Haryana and
western Uttar Pradesh were responsible for a loss of nearly 0.8 to 1.5 million
Integrated Disease Management of Field Crops 603
tones of wheat. In 1980, leaf rust epidemic in Uttar Pradesh and parts of
Bihar caused a loss of one million tones of wheat.
Symptoms
In case of stem rust the pustules appear a narrow, dark brown elliptical,
parallel with the axis of the stem, on the leaf, leaf sheath and on glumes of the
spike. The epidermis covering the pustules rupture irregularly, exposing masses
of reddish brown uredospores. The pustules of leaf rust are small, oval shaped,
orange to orange brown in colour, scattered on leaf and leaf sheath. Uredinaks
pustules are may also developed on awns, glumes, peduncles, and internodes.
Stem rust has been a serious disease of wheat, barley, oat and rye, as well as
various important grasses. Infections in cereals occur mainly on stems and
leaf sheaths, but occasionally they may be found on leaf blades and glumes as
well. The first macroscopic symptom usually appears as a small chlorotic
fleck, after a few days of infection. About 8-10 days after infection, a long
pustule is formed by rupturing the host epidermis from pressure of a mass
urediospores of brick-red colour produced in the infection. The powdery
masses of urediospores appear similar to rust spots on a weathered iron
surface. With age, the infection ceases production of brick-red urediospores
and produces a layer of black teliospores in their place, causing the stems of
heavily infected plants to appear black in the late season (Leona and Szabo,
2005).
Integrated Management
Grow resistant varieties of wheat recommended for particular area and
grow different varieties at the farm level. Apply balanced dose of nitrogen
and potash. Spray Dithane M 45 @ 0.2% or propiconazole or tebuconazole @
0.1% along with 0.1% sandovit. Kalappanavar (2008) reported that the
fungicide propiconazole performed best followed by triadimefon and
hexaconazole and in the categories other than fungicides, neem leaf extract,
Trichoderma harzianum and Panchgavya were the succeeding treatments
effective against leaf rust of wheat. The yield of the plots sprayed with
propiconazole, triadimefon and hexaconazole were significantly superior with
low intensity of the leaf rust on yield and higher 1000-grain weight. Parsons
(2000) found that the phosphorus (P) fertilization had a moderately
suppressive effect on leaf rust and the increased yield due to production of
about 50% more ear heads per unit area apparently from more prolific tillering
and potassium (K) fertilization reduced leaf rust severity and improved yield
by increasing kernel weight. P and K fertilization along with fungicide
application is an important management tool for reducing disease and
increasing winter wheat yield.
604 Ecologically Based Integrated Pest Management
Symptoms
In case of loose smut entire inflorescence, except the rachis, is replaced
by masses of smut spores. These black teliospores often are blown away by
the wind, leaving only the bare rachis and remnants of other floral structure.
Karnal bunt is not easily detected prior to harvest, since it is usual for
only a few kernels per spike to be affected by the disease. Following harvest,
disease kernels can be easily detected by visual infections. A mass of black
teliospores replaces a portion of endosperm, and the pericarp may be intact
or ruptured. Disease kernels give off a fetid or fishy smell when crushed.
Karnal bunt of wheat is caused by the fungus Tilletia indica, which partially
converts kernels into sori filled with teliospores. Despite minor overall yield
and quality losses, the disease is of considerable international quarantine
concern (Goates and Jackson, 2006).
Integrated Management
Flag Smut
Flag smut of wheat incited by Urocystis agropyri could be managed by
growing resistant cultivars like WH 293 or HD 2329. Seed treatment with
tubeconazole @ 2.0 g/kg, or carboxin and carbendazim @ 2.5 g/kg seed
reduced cent per cent disease incidence. Application of poultry manure
@ 4–6 t per ha managed flag smut. Nl60P50 kg per ha and early or late sowing
were found effective in management of the disease (Kumar and Singh, 2004).
Loose Smut
Sowing of resistant varieties like Kalyan Sona, Sonalika and PU 18 is
mainly adopted for the management of the disease. Seed treatment with
Integrated Disease Management of Field Crops 605
Vitavax @ 2-2.5 g/kg seed before sowing can manage the disease by reducing
the seed borne primary inoculum. Roguing out suspected disease ears at the
time of ear emergence and destroyed them properly by burning or burring
under the ground. Soaking of seeds and solar heat treatment of seeds is
practicable in hot summer areas of plains. During bright sunny days in the
last weeks of May or first week of June soak the seed in water for about four
hours in the morning and dry it under hot sun in the afternoon. Storage of
properly dried seed for use in the next season is also reduce the disease
incidence.
Karnal Bunt
Sowing of resistant varieties and use of disease free seeds are the important
control measure for the management of the disease. Treatment of the seeds
before sowing with Vitavax @ 2-2.5 g/kg seeds minimize the disease intensity
through elimination of seed borne infection. Avoidance of excessive irrigation
at the time of flowering also reduce the disease intensity.
Common Bunt
Treatment of the seeds before sowing with Vitavax @ 2-2.5 g/kg seeds
reduce the disease intensity by elimination of seed borne primary inoculums.
Cultivation of common bunt resistant varieties like Kalyan Sona, Panjamo-62
and PU-18.
Symptoms
Alternaria blight symptoms appear as small, oval, discoloured lesion,
irregularly scattered on leaves. As lesion enlarged, they become irregular and
dark brown to grey surrounded by yellow margin. Later several lesions coalesce
and cover large areas exhibiting bunt appearance. The lesion on leaves caused
606 Ecologically Based Integrated Pest Management
by B. sorokiniana are light brown to almost black, which are circular linear or
elliptical. A well developed lesion is typically elliptical with abundant
sporulation.
Integrated Management
Cultivation of resistant varieties is an important component of disease
management. Hot water treatment of seeds at 52ºC for 10 minutes before
sowing provides good control of the disease by reducing primary inoculum.
Seed treatment with fungicide vitavax @ 2.5 g/kg of seeds also effective for
the management of the disease in the field. Use of balanced NPK fertilizers
and irrigation reduce the intensity. Spraying of plants with Dithane M 45 @
0.2% or propiconazole or tebuconazole @ 0.1% at 25-35 days interval starting
from the the first symptoms appearance in the field.
Powdery Mildew
Powdery mildew of wheat is caused by Erysiphe graminis tritici. It is widely
distributed in the humid and sub humid wheat growing regions of the world.
It is basically important disease of northern hilly region of India. This disease
is also occurs in the north-western region of the Indo Gangatic Plains where
stripe and brown rust are the potential threat to wheat production. It is believed
that heavy attack of powdery mildew in hilly and north-west plain regions
result in yield losses through reduced grain size.
Symptoms
All the green part of the plant, the upper surface or undersize of the
leaves, sometimes both surface together, the stem or even the ears are affected
by the pathogens, exhibiting white to grey coloured powdery masses on the
plant surface. The cottony powdery mass contains the conidia and
conidiophores of the fungus. As the season progresses, small black cleistothecia
developed on the powdery mass. The infected leaves are twisted, crinkled
and deformed, infected plant become yellow and photosynthetic rates are
severely affected.
Integrated Management
Sowing of resistant varieties is the major control measure. Burning of the
previous crop refuses in the field after harvesting the crop could reduce the
disease intensity. Spraying of the fungicide mixture of 16 parts Dithane M-45
and 4 parts Karathane 25 WP @ 2 kg/ha in 800 litres water. Two to three
sprays of the mixture should be given at an interval of 10-15 days if losses are
expected to very high.
Integrated Disease Management of Field Crops 607
Symptoms
Spot appear as distinct large, indefinite, spindle shaped, grey centred
and lavender blue, purple grey horizon with yellow margin on leaf blade
(Fig. 7). On the stem, one or two nods just below the panicles, grayish black
or dark lesions appear. The grains are mostly half filled or unfilled and
generally grains are partially chaffy, brittle or unfilled; panicle show white
appearance.
Integrated Management
Cultivation of resistant varieties like Vandana, Pathara, Hira, Savitri,
Gayatri, Ratana, Annada, Udaya, Sarasa etc. help to get effective control of
rice blast diseases. Use of healthy seeds for nursery raising and seed treatment
with thiram @ 2.5 g or bavistin 2 g/kg of seed gives good control by avoiding
the primary inoculum. Burning of affected straw and stubbles after harvest is
also a good practice of disease management. High dose of nitrogenous fertilizer
(> 60 kg/ha) increases the disease intensity so, it should be avoided and
phosphorus and potash fertilizer (60 kg/ha) should be use to reduce the
epidemics of the disease. To avoid vulnerable phase for blast development,
planting of crop adjusted in such a way that active tillering stage should not
fall during 3rd week of September to 2nd week of November. In endemic area
the disease appears every year spray the crop with 0.1 % Hinosan 50 EC
(1 ml/ litre) or Edifenphos (0.06%) or copper oxychloride (0.3%). Singh et al.
(1975) found hinosan @ 0.1 per cent superior to other treatments. Two
treatments of azoxystrobin and trifloxystrobin at 250 and 125 g/ha,
respectively, were more effective for management of blast and neck blast and
reduced incidence and severity by 90-100% and by 75-90%, respectively.
Antibiotic Kasugamycin @ 20-30 mg/l to be found very effective in preventing
secondary spread.
Brown spot : (Bipolaris oyzae)
608 Ecologically Based Integrated Pest Management
Symptoms
The spot are small, definite, some spot may be oval to oblong, light brown
or straw centre and dark reddish brown margin. Dark brown to black, oval
or oblong spots on the glumes, whole surface of grain black and velvety.
Integrated Management
Treatment of the seeds with thiram or bavistin 2 g/kg of seeds. Add
murate of potash to correct the potash deficiency in the soil and apply balanced
dose of fertilizer to minimize the disease in the field. Three to four spray of
Dithane M-45 @ 2.5 g/l of water or bavistin or propiconazole 0.1 per cent at
15 days interval just before the appearance of first symptoms of the disease.
Cultivation of moderately resistant varieties like Bala, Krishna, Sabarmati and
IR 24. Seeds should not be collected from the diseased fields and plants.
Sheath Blight
Paracer and Chahal (1963) first described the disease in detail from
Gurdaspur, Punjab. Later, this disease was reported from Uttar Pradesh (Kohli,
1966), Orissa (Das, 1975) and Tamil Nadu (Kanniyan and Prasad,1976) as
well. Sheath blight a fungal disease of rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn.,
is prevalent in upland and low land rice. It is gaining importance in Andhra
Pradesh, Assam, Kerala, Punjab and Tamil Nadu and its incidence has also
been recorded in Jammu and Kashmir, Orrisa, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal.
The extent of damage due to sheath blight is more than 25 per cent. Roy
(1979) reported that yield losses vary from 10 to 36 per cent depending upon
the crop growth stage at which the disease first appears.
Symptoms
On leaf blade greenish grey irregular lesions with dark line on margins,
lesion large and develop irregularly on older plants. The symptoms appear
on stem and sheath with large greenish grey or dark edged whitish lesions
which are oval, oblong, cobra patches, irregular and necrotic. Small, white or
brown, globular sclerotial bodies are loosely attached to the surface.
Integrated Management
The disease control strategy should be rather preventive to realize
maximum yields. Using seeds from healthy crop. Deep ploughing and use of
limited but adequate nitrogenous fertilizers. Avoiding close planting and follow
field sanitation i.e. burning of disease straw, stubbles and chaff and eradication
of graminaceous weeds and water hyacinth in and around the field. Soil
amendment with green manure and rotation of rice with dicot crops. Avoiding
field to field irrigation. Some of promising ones with moderate resistant to
Integrated Disease Management of Field Crops 609
sheath blight are T141, CR 1014, Ptb 21, Ptb 33, Swarndhan, IET 6056 IET
6105, CR-44-11, Krishna and Saket-I. The disease can be controlled by need
based application of fungicides such as Bavistin or MBC (0.1%) and delayed
top dressing of nitrogenous fertilizer when 10 per cent or more tillers are
affected during early planting of mid tillering. Second spraying of Bavistin or
MBC (0.1%) is done when 10 per cent or more tillers are affected during
panicle initiation to booting stage. Bhuyan et al. (1994) reported the antagonist
activity of Trichoderma viride, Trichoderma harzianum and Aspergillus terreus
against R. solani. Baby and Manibhushanrao (1996) evaluated Trichoderma
spp. and Gliocladium virens as well as some vesicular arbuscular fungi against
sheath blight (R.solani) of rice in field and reported that Tirchoderma spp.
(T. harzianum and T. longibrachiotum) and Gliocladium virens were equally
effective in controlling the disease.
Bacterial blight of rice : (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae)
This is also most important disease of rice and appears in rice field
cultivated under low land areas. The losses due to bacterial blight may reach
30 to 50 per cent. In certain years rice fields infected with blight in different
states are reported to suffer yield loss up to 60 per cent.
Symptoms
The disease appears in two phases viz., wilt or kresek phase and leaf
blight phase.
Kresek Phase
This is most destructive phase of the disease which result from the early
systemic infection. The leaves roll completely, droop and turn yellow or grey
ultimately the tillers wither away. Affected shoot may be completely killed in
severe attack.
Integrated Management
Use disease free seeds from the reliable sources. Drain the standing water
in the field from time to time. Incorporate balanced dose of NPK fertilizers
610 Ecologically Based Integrated Pest Management
after soil testing and avoid use of heavy dose of nitrogen fertilizer aggravates
the disease. Spray the crop with a mixture of copper oxychloride and
streptomycin. Apply 7.5 g streptomycin or Agrimycin and 500 g Copper
oxychloride (fytolan or blitox-50) in 500 litre water. Seed soaking for 12 hours
and treating in hot water at 530C for 30 minutes will make the seeds free from
bacterium. Cultivation of resistant varieties like Ratna, Pusa 2-21, IR 20,
Prasad, Govind, IR 24, Jaya, Vijaya, Shakti, Rudra, Shankar, Parijat, Keshari,
Annapurna, IR 36, Mahalaxmi.
Symptoms
An early symptom is the easily recognizable; the symptoms produced as
slightly oval, water-soaked, small spots produced on the leaves. These lesions
Integrated Disease Management of Field Crops 611
Management
Harlapur et al. (2007) reported that Neem seed kernel extract @ five per
cent concentration showed maximum inhibition of growth (56.64%) followed
by Aloe vera @ 10 per cent (53.50%). Among the bio-agents, Trichoderma
harzianum was effective in inhibition of growth (65.17%) and in the fungicides
tested, mancozeb @ 0.25 per cent completely inhibited the growth. Carboxin
power @ 0.1 per cent and propiconazole @ 0.1 per cent were the other effective
fungicides. The development of cultivars resistant to E. turcicum seems to be
the most efficient method to control NCLB damage (Khampila et al.,2008).
Vieira et al. (2009) reported that the hybrids of popcorn UEM129, UEM145,
UEM140, UEM116 and UEM101 presented the lowest levels of disease and
were considered the most resistance genotypes. Okori et al. (1999) reported
that the infection by maize streak virus (MSV) masked the symptoms
expression of turcicum leaf blight (TLB).
Symptom
The young lesions are observed as small diamond shaped lesion. As they
mature the elongation of lesion takes place. Growth is limited to adjacent
veins, so finally the shape of lesion is rectangular of 2 to 3 cm long. Lesions
may coalesce, producing a complete burning of large areas of the leaves. The
symptoms described above correspond to the “O” strain of the fungus. In the
early 1970s the “T” strain caused severe damage to maize cultivars. Lesions
produced by the T strain are oval and larger than those produced by the O
strain. A major difference is that the T strain affects husks and leaf sheaths,
while the O strain normally does not affects husks and leaf sheaths. Maydis
612 Ecologically Based Integrated Pest Management
leaf blight (or southern maize leaf blight) is prevalent in hot and humid maize-
growing areas. The fungus requires slightly higher temperatures than
E. turcicum for infection. Both species are often found on the same plant.
Management
Sprying of any copper fungicides@ 0.3 per cent or Dithane M 25 @ 0.25
per cent after the appearance of the disease gives good result. Kumar et al.
(2009) found that the garlic, clove, neem leaf and tulsi leaf and bael leaf extract
was highly effective in inhibiting the growth of Helminthosporium maydis from
37 to 65 per cent.
Management
The major approach to management of these diseases has been the
utilization of host resistance. Resistance varieties viz., Ganga 11, Deccan 105
and inbred lines CM 104, Cm 105 have been reported to durable resistance to
this disease. Complete control was obtained by a schedule of four spray
applications of carbamate group of fungicide (Dithane M-45) @ 0.2 % a.i., on
a susceptible cultivar Basi in case of common rust. Reuveni et al. (1994) reported
thata single foliar spray of phosphate salts solution induced systemic resistance
against common rust as expressed by 98% reduction in the number of pustules
of P. sorghi.
Stalk Rot
This group of disease is broadly dividisible into two categories i.e., pre
flowering and post flowering types.
Management
Planting should be done timely between 10 and 20th of July, which is
prevalent in North India. Plant population should not exceed 50,000/ha.
Maintenance of good field drainage, and Removal of previous crop debris to
minimize the primary inoculum. Growing of resistant varieties viz., hybrids
Ganga Safed 2, high starch and composite Suwan 1 is recommended for the
disease prone area. Application of Captan @ 120g a.i.,/100 litre of water as
soil drench at the base of the plants when crop is 5 to 7 week old can effectively
check this disease.
Referances
Agrios, G.N. 2005. Plant Pathology. Academic Press, California.
Baby, U.I. and Manibhusharrao, K. 1996. Fungal antagonists and VA Mycorrhizal fungi
for bio- control of Rhizoctonia solani, the rice sheath blight pathogen, pp. 1-9. In :
Recent Development in Biocontrol of Plant Pathogens (Eds. K. Manibhushan Rao and
A. Mahadevan). Today and Tomorrow Printers and Publishers, Karol Bagh, New
Delhi.
Bhuyan, S.A., Das, B.C. and Bore, L.C. 1994. Antagonistic effect of Trichoderma viride,
Trichoderma harzianum and Aspergillus terrus on R. solani. Journal of Agri. Science
Society of North East India. 7: 125-127.
Chander, S., Aggarwal, P.K., Kalra, Naveen and Swaruparani, D.N. 2003. Changes in
Pest Profiles in Rice-Wheat Cropping System in Indo-Gangetic Plains. Annals of
Plant Protection Sciences. 11 (2).
Chatrath, R., Mishra, B., Ortiz Ferrara, G., Singh, S.K. and Joshi, A.K. 2007. Challenges to
Wheat Production in South Asia. Euphytica. 157 (3) : 447-456.
Das, S.R. 1975. Occurrence of sheath blight disease of rice in Western Orrisa. Indian
Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology. 5: 54.
Dorothea S. B.; H. G. Welz and H.H. Geiger, 1998. Molecular marker analysis of European
Setosphaeria turcica populations. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 104(6):
611-617.
Geagea, L., Huber, L., Sache, I., Flura, D., McCartney, H.A. and Fitt, B.D.L. 2000. Influence
of Simulated Rain on Dispersal of Rust Spores from Infected Wheat Seedlings.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 101 (1) : 53-66.
Goates, B.J. and Jackson, E.W. 2006. Susceptibility of Wheat to Tilletia indica During
Stages of Spike Development. Phytopathology. 96 (9) : 962-966.
Harlapur, S.I., Kulkarni, M.S., Wali, M.C. and Kulkarni, S. 2007. Evaluation of Plant
Extracts, Bio-agents and Fungicides Against Exserohilum turcicum (Pass.) Leonard
and Suggs. Causing Turcicum Leaf Blight of Maize. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural
Sciences. 20 (3).
Harlapur, S.I., Kulkarni, M.S., Wali, M.C., Kulkarni, S., Hegde, Y. and Patil, B.C. 2008.
Status of Turcicum Leaf Blight of Maize in Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of
Agricultural Sciences. 21 (1).
Joshi, L.M., Singh, D.V. and Srivastava, K.D. 1986. Problems and progress of wheat
pathology in South Asia. Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi.
Kalappanavar, I.K., Patidar, RK., Kulkarni, S. 2008. Management Strategies of Leaf Rust
of Wheat Caused by Puccinia recondita f. sp. Tritici Rob. ex. Desm Karnataka Journal
of Agricultural Sciences. 21 (1).
Kannaiyan, S. and Prasad, N.N. 1976. Efficacy of certain fungicides in the control of
sheath blight disease of rice. Madras Agriculture Journal. 63: 407-408.
Khampila, J., Lertrat, K., Saksirirat, W., Sanitchon, J., Muangsan, N. and Theerakulpisut,
P. 2008. Identification of RAPD and SCAR Markers Linked to Northern Leaf Blight
Resistance in Waxy Corn (Zea mays var. ceratina). Euphytica. 164 (3) : 615-625.
Integrated Disease Management of Field Crops 617
Kohli, C.G. 1966. Pathogencity and host range studies of paddy sheath blight pathogen.
Journal of Research, Punjab Agriculture University. 3:37-40.
Kumar, S., Rani, A. and Jha, M.M. 2009. Evaluation of Plant Extracts for Management of
Maydis Leaf Blight of Maize. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 17 (1).
Kumar, V.R. and Singh, B. 2004. Management of Flag Smut in Wheat. Annals of Plant
Protection Sciences. 12 (1).
Leona, K.J. and Szabo, L.J. 2005. Stem rust of small grains and grasses caused by Puccinia
graminis. Molecular Plant Pathology. 6 (2) : 99-111.
Okori, P., Adipala, E. and Kyetere, D.T. 1999. Induced Resistance to Turcicum Leaf Blight
in Maize when Doubly Infected with Maize Streak Virus Disease. International
Journal of Pest Management. 45 (2) : 111-116.
Paracer, C.S. and Chahal, D.S. 1963. Sheath blight of rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani
Kuhn, a new record in India. Current Science. 32: 320-329.
Reuveni, R., Agapov, V. and Reuveni, M. 1994. Foliar Spray of Phosphates Induces Growth
Increase and Systemic Resistance to Puccinia sorghi in Maize. Plant Pathology. 43
(2): 245-250.
Roy, A.K. 1979. Identification of strains of Corticium sasakii in India. International Rice
Research Newsletter. 4: 17.
Sweeney, D.W., Granade, G.V., Eversmeyer, M.G. and Whitney, D.A. 2000. Phosphorus,
Potassium, Chloride, and Fungicide Effects on Wheat Yield and Leaf Rust Severity
Journal of Plant Nutrition. 23 (9) : 1267-1281.
Sharma, G., Saxena, S.C. and Sharma, G. 2001. Evaluation of biocontrol agents against
Rhizoctonia solani-the causal agent of banded leaf and sheath of maize. Annals of
Plant Protection Sciences. 9: 144-145.
Shah, D.A. and Dillard, H.R. 2006. Yield Loss in Sweet Corn Caused by puccinia Sorghi: A
Meta-analysis. Plant Disease. 90(11): 1413-1418.
Shivankar, S.K. and Shivankar, R.S. 2000. Losses in Grain Yield Due to Turcicum Leaf
Blight Disease in Maize. Agricultural Science Digest. 20 (3).
Singh, G., Chohan, J.S. and Sandhu, K.S. 1975. Fungicidal control of rice blast. Indian
Phytopathology 28 : 422-423.
Thind, T.S. 2005. Diseases of field crops and their management. Daya Publishing House,
New Delhi.
Vieira, R.A., Tessmann, D.J., Hata, F.T., Souto, E.R. and Mesquini, R.M. 2009. Resistance
of Popcorn Hybrids to Exserohilum Turcicum, Causal Agent of Northern Leaf
Blight of Maize. Scientia Agraria. 10 (5) : 391-395.
Welz, H.G. and Geiger, H.H. 2000. Genes for Resistance to Northern Corn Leaf Blight in
Diverse Maize Populations. Plant Breeding. 119 (1) : 1-14.