Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    J26 AB Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    msgreenhwang

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    J26 AB Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    msgreenhwang
    0 views3 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    0 views3 pages

    J26 AB Peer Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    msgreenhwang

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Honsbridge International

    School
    Building Bridges, Exceeding Expectations

    Name : Date :
    Class : J26 A / B Teacher : Ms SYAZNI
    Subject : BIOLOGY Marks :

    Peer Evaluation Rubric for Group Presentation


    Name of groupmate:

    Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Needs Improvement (1) Score
    Presentation was thorough,
    Presentation was mostly
    accurate, and well- Major gaps in content or
    Content & accurate and covered key Some content was inaccurate
    researched. Information was inaccuracies that affect
    Accuracy points, with minor gaps or or missing important points.
    clear, relevant, and well- understanding.
    omissions.
    organized.
    Ideas were presented in a
    Organization was clear, but
    clear, logical order. Organization was somewhat Presentation was
    Clarity & some ideas were presented less
    Transitions between topics confusing; it was hard to disorganized, making it
    Organization logically or transitions were
    were smooth and easy to follow the flow of ideas. difficult to follow.
    awkward.
    follow.
    Presenter was confident, Presenter was mostly confident,
    Presenter showed some Presenter was disengaged,
    engaging, and maintained but may have occasionally
    Engagement & nervousness or had difficulty lacked eye contact, or
    eye contact with the lacked engagement or had
    Delivery engaging the audience. Tone struggled to keep the
    audience. Used appropriate minor issues with pace or
    or volume was inconsistent. audience's attention.
    volume, pace, and tone. volume.
    Teamwork & Group worked seamlessly Group worked well together Some group members did not Group collaboration was
    Collaboration together, and all members with some minor issues contribute equally, affecting poor, with noticeable lack
    contributed equally and regarding equal participation. overall teamwork. of participation from some

    1|PEER EVALUATION| PROJECT PRESENTATION


    Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Needs Improvement (1) Score
    effectively. members.
    Visuals (e.g., slides, Visuals were poorly
    Visuals were appropriate and Visuals were unclear or
    Visual Aids & handouts) were clear, designed or not used,
    clear, but could have been more distracting, and did not
    Materials professional, and enhanced detracting from the
    polished or better integrated. support the presentation well.
    the presentation. presentation.
    Presentation was too short or Presentation was
    Presentation was well-timed, Presentation slightly exceeded
    Time too long, affecting the clarity significantly too short or
    with all points covered in the or fell short of the time but was
    Management or completeness of the too long, detracting from
    allotted time. still effective.
    information. the overall impact.
    Responded to questions with Responded to questions Struggled to respond to
    Responsiveness Responses to questions were
    clear, confident, and well- adequately, but answers could questions or gave
    to Questions unclear or incomplete.
    thought-out answers. have been more detailed. inaccurate answers.

     What did you find most effective about the presentation?

     What could be improved for future group presentations?

     Any other feedback or suggestions?

    Scoring Guide:

    2|PEER EVALUATION| PROJECT PRESENTATION


     Total Score: ___ / 28
     Average Score: ___ / 4.0

    Instructions:

     Please provide honest and constructive feedback based on your observations during the presentation.
     Evaluate each criterion individually, providing a score from 1 to 4, with 4 being the best.
     Use the “Additional Comments” section to offer specific feedback to your peers.

    3|PEER EVALUATION| PROJECT PRESENTATION

    You might also like