sdadf214
sdadf214
sdadf214
org/wiki/English_law
English law
English law is the common law legal system of England and
Wales, comprising mainly criminal law and civil law, each
branch having its own courts and procedures.[1][2][3] The
judiciary is independent, and legal principles like fairness,
equality before the law, and the right to a fair trial are
foundational to the system.
Common law is made by sitting judges who apply both statutory law and established principles
which are derived from the reasoning from earlier decisions. Equity is the other historic source of
judge-made law. Common law can be amended or repealed by Parliament.[6][b]
Not being a civil law system, it has no comprehensive codification.[c] However, most of its criminal
law has been codified from its common law origins, in the interests both of certainty and of ease of
prosecution.[7][8] For the time being, murder remains a common law crime rather than a statutory
offence.[9][d]
Although Scotland and Northern Ireland form part of the United Kingdom and share Westminster
as a primary legislature, they have separate legal systems outside English law.
International treaties such as the European Union's Treaty of Rome[e] or the Hague-Visby Rules
have effect in English law only when adopted and ratified by Act of Parliament.[11] Adopted treaties
may be subsequently denounced by executive action,[12] unless the denouncement or withdraw
would affect rights enacted by Parliament. In this case, executive action cannot be used owing to
the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. This principle was established in the case of R (Miller) v
Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union in 2017.
1 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
Legal terminology
The reforming Judicature Acts of the 1880s amalgamated the courts into one Supreme Court of
Judicature which was directed to administer both law and equity.[17] The neo-Gothic Royal Courts
of Justice in The Strand, London, were built shortly afterwards to celebrate these reforms.
Legal remedies
A remedy is "the means given by law for the recovery of a right, or of compensation for its
infringement".[18] Most remedies are available only from the court, but some are "self-help"
remedies; for instance, a party who lawfully wishes to cancel[j] a contract may do so without leave;
[k][20] and a person may take his own steps to "abate a private nuisance".
Formerly, most civil actions claiming damages in the High Court were commenced by obtaining a
writ issued in the Queen's name. After 1979, writs have merely required the parties to appear, and
2 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
writs are no longer issued in the name of the Crown.[21] After the Woolf Reforms of 1999, almost all
civil actions other than those connected with insolvency are commenced by the completion of a
Claim Form [22] as opposed to a writ, originating application, or a summons.[23]
Statute law
Sir William Blackstone in 1774, after
Primary legislation in the UK may take the following forms: his appointment as a Justice of the
Court of King's Bench
Acts of Parliament
Acts of the Scottish Parliament
Acts of the Senedd, or previously Acts of the National Assembly for Wales and measures of the
National Assembly for Wales
Statutory rules of the Northern Ireland Assembly
Orders in Council are a sui generis category of legislation.
Common law
3 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
Common law is a term with historical origins in the legal system of England. It denotes, in the first
place, the Anglo-Norman legal system that superseded and replaced Anglo-Saxon law in England
following the Battle of Hastings in 1066. Throughout the Late Medieval Period, English law was
codified through judge-made laws and precedents that were created in the proceedings of Royal
justices in the Circuit courts dictated by the Eyres throughout the country (these themselves
evolving from the early medieval Itinerant courts). This body of legal scholarship was first
published at the end of the 19th century, The History of English Law before the Time of Edward I,
[27] in which Pollock and Maitland expanded the work of Coke (17th century) and Blackstone (18th
century). Specifically, the law developed in England's Court of Common Pleas and other common
law courts, which became also the law of the colonies settled initially under the Crown of England
or, later, of the United Kingdom, in United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa,
Singapore, Indian Subcontient, Israel and elsewhere.
This law further developed after those courts in England were reorganised by the Supreme Court of
Judicature Acts passed in the 1870s. It developed independently, in the legal systems of the United
States and other jurisdictions, after their independence from the United Kingdom, before and after
the 1870s. The term is used, in the second place, to denote the law developed by those courts, in the
same periods, pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial, as distinct from within the jurisdiction, or
former jurisdiction, of other courts in England: the Court of Chancery, the ecclesiastical courts, and
the Admiralty court.
In the Oxford English Dictionary (1933) "common law" is described as "The unwritten law of
England, administered by the King's courts, which purports to be derived from ancient usage, and
is embodied in the older commentaries and the reports of abridged cases", as opposed, in that
sense, to statute law, and as distinguished from the equity administered by the Chancery and
similar courts, and from other systems such as ecclesiastical law, and admiralty law.[28] For usage
in the United States the description is "the body of legal doctrine which is the foundation of the law
administered in all states settled from England, and those formed by later settlement or division
from them".[29]
He argued that these institutions were transmitted to England by the Normans,[30] "through the
close connection between the Norman kingdoms of Roger II in Sicily — ruling over a conquered
Islamic administration — and Henry II in England."[32] Makdisi argued that the "law schools
known as Inns of Court" in England, which he asserts are parallel to Madrasahs, may have also
originated from Islamic law.[30] He states that the methodology of legal precedent and reasoning
by analogy (Qiyas) are similar in both the Islamic and common law systems.[33]
4 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
Other legal scholars such as Monica Gaudiosi, Gamal Moursi Badr and A. Hudson have argued that
the English trust and agency institutions, which were introduced by Crusaders, may have been
adapted from the Islamic Waqf and Hawala institutions they came across in the Middle East.[34]
[35] Paul Brand notes parallels between the Waqf and the trusts used to establish Merton College
Early development
In 1276, the concept of "time immemorial" often applied in common law, was defined as being any
time before 6 July 1189 (i.e. before Richard I's accession to the English throne). Since 1189, English
law has been a common law, not a civil law system. In other words, no comprehensive codification
of the law has taken place and judicial precedents are binding as opposed to persuasive. This may
be a legacy of the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, when a number of legal concepts and
institutions from Norman law were introduced to England.[36]
In the early centuries of English common law, the justices and judges were responsible for
adapting the system of writs to meet everyday needs, applying a mixture of precedent and common
sense to build up a body of internally consistent law. An example is the Law Merchant derived from
the "Pie-Powder" Courts, named from a corruption of the French pieds-poudrés ("dusty feet")
implying ad hoc marketplace courts.
Following Montesquieu's theory of the "separation of powers", only Parliament has the power to
legislate. If a statute is ambiguous, then the courts have exclusive power to decide its true meaning,
using the principles of statutory interpretation. Since the courts have no authority to legislate, the
"legal fiction" is that they "declare" (rather than "create") the common law. The House of Lords
took this "declaratory power" a stage further in DPP v Shaw,[37] where, in creating the new crime
of "conspiracy to corrupt public morals", Viscount Simonds claimed the court had a "residual
power to protect the moral welfare of the state".[38][39] As Parliament became ever more
established and influential, Parliamentary legislation gradually overtook judicial law-making, such
that today's judges are able to innovate only in certain, very narrowly defined areas.
Overseas influences
Reciprocity
England exported its common law and statute law to most parts of the British Empire. Many
aspects of that system have survived after Independence from British rule, and the influences are
often reciprocal. "English law" prior to the American Revolutionary Wars (American War of
Independence) is still an influence on American law, and provides the basis for many American
legal traditions and principles.
After independence, English common law still exerted influence over American common law – for
example, Byrne v Boadle (1863), which first applied the res ipsa loquitur doctrine. Jurisdictions
that have kept to the common law may incorporate modern legal developments from England, and
English decisions are usually persuasive in such jurisdictions.
5 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
Even after independence, many former British colonies in the Commonwealth continued to use the
Privy Council, as it offered a readily available high-grade service. In particular, several Caribbean
Island nations found the Privy Council advantageous.
Britain has long been a major trading nation, exerting a strong influence on the law of shipping and
maritime trade. The English law of salvage,[42] collisions,[43] ship arrest,[44] and carriage of goods
by sea[45] are subject to international conventions which Britain played a leading role in drafting.
Many of these conventions incorporate principles derived from English common law[w] and
documentary procedures.[x]
British jurisdictions
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland comprises three legal jurisdictions:
England and Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Although Scotland and Northern Ireland
form part of the United Kingdom and share the Parliament at Westminster as the primary
legislature, they have separate legal systems. Scotland became part of the UK over 300 years ago,
but Scots law has remained remarkably distinct from English law.
The UK's highest civil appeal court is the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, whose decisions,
6 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
Any reference to England in legislation between 1746 and 1967 is deemed to include Wales. As to
later legislation, any application to Wales must be expressed under the Welsh Language Act 1967
and the jurisdiction is, since, correctly and widely referred to as England and Wales.
Devolution has granted some political autonomy to Wales via the Welsh Parliament, which gained
its power to pass primary legislation under the Government of Wales Act 2006, in force since the
2007 Welsh general election. The legal system administered through civil and criminal courts is
unified throughout England and Wales.
This is different from Northern Ireland, for example, which did not cease to be a distinct
jurisdiction when its legislature was suspended (see Northern Ireland (Temporary Provisions) Act
1972). A major difference is use of the Welsh language, as laws concerning it apply in Wales and
not in the rest of the United Kingdom. The Welsh Language Act 1993 is an Act of the Parliament of
the United Kingdom, which put the Welsh language on an equal footing with the English language
in Wales with regard to the public sector. Welsh may also be spoken in Welsh courts.
There have been calls from both Welsh academics and politicians for a separate Welsh justice
system.[47][48][49]
7 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
Company law
Constitutional law
Contract law
Criminal law[y]
Criminal (law) procedure
Employment and Agency[z]
Equity
Financial services and institutions[aa]
Evidence and Actionability
Family law (private and public regarding local authorities)
Bankruptcy and Insolvency
Probate (and intestacy) law
Property law (with tort, contract and criminal overlap) (includes land, landlord and tenant,
occupancy, housing conditions and intellectual property law, sales, auctions and
repossessions)
Maritime law and law of the sea (mainly private and public international law)
Taxation, tax credits and benefits law[ab]
Tort law
Trust law
See also
Books of authority
England portal
Effect of European Communities Act 1972
Law Commission (England and Wales) Law portal
Notes
a. English regulations are not to be confused with EU Regulations
b. The old estates in land were replaced by new provisions in the 1925 property legislation
8 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
c. Two areas of commercial law, sale of goods and marine insurance, were codified into
(respectively) the Sale of Goods Act 1893 and the Marine Insurance Act 1906.
d. In contentious cases, such as the battered wife's revenge, or family mercy killings, English
juries have been glad of the ability to treat a clear murder as though it were manslaughter.[10]
e. Now renamed as Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
f. ... or "claimant", "plaintiff", "petitioner" etc.
g. An example of civil law is the Napoleonic Code in France
h. Equitable maxims include: "Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy", "Equity acts
on the person" and "He who comes into equity must come with clean hands".[16]
i. This distinction is borrowed from civil law systems, and is neither as useful nor as appropriate
in England as in Europe.
j. Using repudiation or rescission, (as the case may be)
k. If the other party feels that the first was wrong to cancel, he may ask a court to "declare the
contract subsisting".[19]
l. Parliamentary conventions should not be confused with international conventions, which are
treaties adopted and ratified by Parliament.
m. Such as Coke and Blackstone.
n. Before 1963 Acts were cited with a comma between the Short Title and the year, e.g. "Acts of
Parliament Numbering and Citation Act, 1962".[1] (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1962/34/
pdfs/ukpga_19620034_en.pdf) The comma has since been dropped, e.g. "British Museum Act
1963 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1963/24/pdfs/ukpga_19630024_en.pdf)"
o. Although in the past this was all spelled out, together with the long title.
p. In this context, "common law" has been described as a body of judge-made law enforced and
developed by the courts which includes equity and admiralty law, and which has always been
"unintelligible without reference to the statute".[41]
q. The US, Britain's first colony to be "lost", has a central federal Supreme Court as well as a
"supreme court" in each state.
r. Any decisions of the Privy Council made before the change of jurisdiction remain binding legal
precedent.
s. Mere agreement to the final text of a treaty is only the first stage, hence "dualist". For instance,
Britain has yet to ratify the terms of the Arrest Convention 1999, so the earlier 1952 treaty is
still in place.
t. Ratification after agreement of a final text often takes decades. In the case of the Maritime
Labour Convention of 2006, even though the EU instructed member states to adopt the MLC,
this "fast-tracked" treaty still did not come into force until 2013.
u. For example, the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was
signed in 1950 and Britain allowed individuals to directly petition the European Commission on
Human Rights from 1966. Now s6(1) Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) makes it unlawful "... for a
public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a convention right", where a "public
authority" is any person or body which exercises a public function, expressly including the
courts but expressly excluding Parliament.
v. Although the European Convention has begun to be applied to the acts of non-state agents,
the Human Rights Act (HRA) does not make the convention specifically applicable between
private parties. Courts have taken the convention into account in interpreting the common law.
They also must take the convention into account in interpreting Acts of Parliament, but must
ultimately follow the terms of the Act even if inconsistent with the convention (s3 HRA).
9 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
References
1. For Civil procedure, see Civil procedure in England and Wales
2. For Criminal procedure, see the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996
3. Note: "English law" is more accurately, termed the law of England and Wales and is applied in
agreements that parties will adopt the jurisdiction of England and Wales as well as for
matters within the physical jurisdiction.
4. Collins English Dictionary (https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/unwritten-law)
5. It is characteristic of the common law to adopt an approach based "on precedent, and on the
development of the law incrementally and by analogy with established authorities", Robinson v
Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, Supreme Court, [2018] UKSC 4, para. 21 (http://ww
w.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2018/4.html)
6. For example, section 4 of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992 repealed the rule in Grant v
Norway (1851) 10 CB 665.
7. Law Commission Report on the Codification of the Criminal Law (https://www.gov.uk/governme
nt/publications/criminal-law-codification-of-the-criminal-law-a-report-of-the-law-commission)
8. Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394
9. Law Commission Consultation Paper no. 177 - "A New Homicide Act for England and Wales?"
10. "Woman walks free after mercy killing case" (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britai
n/woman-walks-free-after-mercy-killing-case-9143264.html). The Independent. Retrieved
2018-08-03.
11. Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971: s.1(1)In this Act, "the Rules" means the International
Convention for the unification of certain rules of law relating to bills of lading (...). s.1(2)The
provisions of the Rules, as set out in the Schedule to this Act, shall have the force of law.
12. Arrest Convention 1952 Art. 17 (http://www.admiraltylawguide.com/conven/arrest1952.html)
13. Other remedies include equitable relief such as an injunction and account of profits.
10 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
14. Penny Darbyshire writes: "... in England ... at no time was it felt necessary to look outside the
principles of common law or equity for assistance. Inevitably, through the ecclesiastical courts
in particular, some Roman law influence can be traced, but in general terms, this is very
limited". - Darbyshire on the English Legal System (2017)
15. The Judicature Acts of 1873-75 abolished the Court of Chancery and "fused" law and equity.
Today, equity cases are mostly dealt with in the Chancery Division of the High Court.
16. Snell, Edmund Henry Turner; Megarry, R.E.; Baker, P.V. (1960). Snell's Principles of Equity (25
ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell. p. 24
17. Snell, Edmund Henry Turner; Megarry, R.E.; Baker, P.V. (1960). Snell's Principles of Equity (25
ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell. p. 10
18. Law Dictionary (10th ed) - E.R.Hardy Ivamay - Butterworths
19. See Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd 1961] EWCA Civ 7
20. Misrepresentation Act 1967 s.2
21. Rules of the Supreme Court (Writ and Appearance) 1979 (Statutory Instrument 1979, No.
1716) (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1979/1716/made), discussed in House of Lords in
1980 (https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1980/feb/07/rules-of-the-supreme-court-w
rit-and)
22. ...as prescribed by Rules 7 How to start proceedings and 8 Alternative procedure for claims of
the Civil Procedure Rules)
23. The Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/3132/contents/made)
24. Slapper; Kelly (2016). English Legal System. Routledge.
25. "Retained EU Law" (https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/brexit/retained-eu-law).
www.lawsociety.org.uk. Retrieved 2024-01-03.
26. See also: acts listed in First Schedule to Short Titles Act, 1896 (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uk
pga/1896/14/pdfs/ukpga_18960014_en.pdf)) where the title is the "short title", and ends in
"Act", as in "Interpretation Act 1978".
27. Professor S. F. C. Milsom (1968). The History of English Law before the Time of Edward I (htt
p://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/pollock-the-history-of-english-law-before-the-time-of-edward-i-2-vols)
. Vol. 1 and 2. Cambridge University Press. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/2020102710
3457/http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/pollock-the-history-of-english-law-before-the-time-of-edward-
i-2-vols) from the original on Oct 27, 2020 – via Online Library of Liberty.
28. OED, 1933 edition: citations supporting that description, before Blackstone, are from the 14th
and 16th centuries.
29. OED, 1933 edition: citations supporting that description are two from 19th century sources.
30. Makdisi, John A. (June 1999). "The Islamic Origins of the Common Law" (http://scholarship.la
w.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3823&context=nclr). North Carolina Law Review. 77 (5).
University of North Carolina School of Law: 1635–1739.
31. Mukul Devichand (24 September 2008). "Is English law related to Muslim law?" (http://news.bb
c.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7631388.stm). BBC News. Retrieved 2008-10-05.
32. Hussain, Jamila (2001). "Book Review: The Justice of Islam by Lawrence Rosen". Melbourne
University Law Review. 30.
33. El-Gamal, Mahmoud A. (2006). Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice. Cambridge
University Press. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-521-86414-5.
11 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
34. Gaudiosi, Monica M. (April 1988). "The Influence of the Islamic Law of Waqf on the
Development of the Trust in England: The Case of Merton College" (https://scholarship.law.upe
nn.edu/penn_law_review/vol136/iss4/6). University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 136 (4):
1231–1261. doi:10.2307/3312162 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F3312162). JSTOR 3312162 (http
s://www.jstor.org/stable/3312162). S2CID 153149243 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusI
D:153149243).
35. Badr, Gamal Moursi (Spring 1978). "Islamic Law: Its Relation to Other Legal Systems". The
American Journal of Comparative Law. 26 (2 – Proceedings of an International Conference on
Comparative Law, Salt Lake City, Utah, February 24–25, 1977): 187–198 [196–8].
doi:10.2307/839667 (https://doi.org/10.2307%2F839667). JSTOR 839667 (https://www.jstor.or
g/stable/839667).
36. "The English legal system" (https://www.iclr.co.uk/knowledge/topics/the-english-legal-system/).
ICLR. Retrieved 2024-01-03.
37. Shaw v DPP 1962 AC 220 HL [n]
38. Shaw v DPP case summary (http://e-lawresources.co.uk/Shaw-v-DPP.php)
39. Viscount Simonds: "There remains in the Courts of Law a residual power to enforce the
supreme and fundamental purpose of the law, to conserve not only the safety and order but
also the moral welfare of the State, and that it is their duty to guard it against attacks which
may be the more insidious because they are novel and unprepared for."
40. Liam Boyle, An Australian August Corpus: Why There is Only One Common Law in Australia (h
ttp://epublications.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1473&context=blr), Bond Law
Review, Volume 27, 2015
41. Liam Boyle: An Australian August Corpus: Why There is Only One Common Law in Australia,
Bond Law Review, Volume 27, 2015. p.29 II Some Preliminary Propositions (http://epublication
s.bond.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1473&context=blr)
42. 1989 Salvage Convention
43. COLREGS
44. 1952 Arrest Convention
45. The Hague-Visby Rules
46. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL [1932] UKHL
47. "Written Statement: Update on the development of the justice system and the legal sector in
Wales (30 September 2021)" (https://gov.wales/written-statement-update-development-justice-
system-and-legal-sector-wales). GOV.WALES. 30 September 2021. Retrieved 2022-11-29.
48. "Plaid Cymru call for devolution of justice to Wales - 'we can't be treated as an appendage to
England' " (https://nation.cymru/news/plaid-cymru-devolution-justice/). Nation.Cymru.
2022-11-29. Retrieved 2022-11-29.
49. "Devolution a 'necessary step' towards a better Welsh criminal justice system, academics
argue" (https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/news/view/2678710-devolution-a-necessary-step-towards-a-b
etter-welsh-criminal-justice-system,-academics-argue). Cardiff University. Retrieved
2023-02-22.
Bibliography
Beale, Joseph H. (1935). A Treatise on the Conflict of Laws. ISBN 978-1-58477-425-9
Darbyshire, Penny (2017). Darbyshire on the English Legal System - 12th ed - Sweet &
Maxwell - ISBN 978-0-414-05785-2
12 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43
English law - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_law
Dicey, A. V.; Morris, J. H. C. & Collins, Lawrence (1993). Dicey and Morris on the Conflict of
Laws 12th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell ISBN 978-0-420-48280-8
Slapper, Gary & Kelly, David (2016). The English Legal System. London: Routledge.
ISBN 978-1-138-94445-9.
Barnett, Hilaire (2008). Constitutional & Administrative Law. London: Routledge-Cavendish.
ISBN 978-0-415-45829-0.
Further reading
Fleming, Justin (1994) Barbarism to Verdict: A History of the Common Law. Sydney, NSW:
Angus & Robertson Publishers. ISBN 978-0-207-17929-7
Greenberg, Daniel & Banaszak, Klara eds. (2012) Jowitt's Dictionary of English Law, 5th ed.
London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Milsom, S. F. C. (2003) A Natural History of the Common Law. New York: Columbia University
Press. ISBN 978-0-231-12994-7
Milsom, S. F. C. (1981) Historical Foundations of the Common Law, 2nd ed. London:
Butterworths; Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-406-62503-8
External links
The History of English Law before the Time of Edward I, 2 vols. (http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/p
ollock-the-history-of-english-law-before-the-time-of-edward-i-2-vols), via Online Library of
Liberty, with notes, by S. F. C. Milsom, originally published in Cambridge University Press's
1968 reissue.
"First Edition of Halsbury’s Laws of England Digitized (https://web.archive.org/web/2019060509
1401/https://lsslib.wordpress.com/2017/03/21/first-edition-of-halsburys-laws-of-england-digitize
d/)", Legal Sourcery, 21 March 2017, Alan Kilpatrick.
Leeming, Mark. "Theories and principles underlying the development of the common law" (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20230326024906/http://www7.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLawJl/2
013/40.pdf) (PDF). Archived from the original (http://www7.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLa
wJl/2013/40.pdf) (PDF) on 2023-03-26. Retrieved 2019-02-18. (2013) 36(3) University of New
South Wales Law Journal 1002.
13 of 13 12/5/2024, 20:43