obtaining-linguistic-data
obtaining-linguistic-data
obtaining-linguistic-data
Many procedures are available for obtaining data about a language. They range from a
carefully planned, intensive field investigation in a foreign country to a casual introspection
about one's mother tongue carried out in an armchair at home.
In all cases, someone has to act as a source of language data - an informant Informants
are (ideally) native speakers of a language, who provide utterances for analysis and other
kinds of information about the language (e.g. translations, comments about correctness, or
judgements on usage). Often, when studying their mother tongue, linguists act as their own
informants, judging the ambiguity, acceptability, or other properties of utterances against
their own intuitions. The convenience of this approach makes it widely used, and it is
considered the norm in the generative approach to linguistics. But a linguist's personal
judgements are often uncertain, or disagree with the judgements of other linguists, at which
point recourse is needed to more objective methods of enquiry, using non-linguists as
informants.
The latter procedure is unavoidable when working on foreign languages, or child speech.
Many factors must be considered when selecting informants - whether one is working with
single speakers (a common situation when languages have not been described before),
two people interacting, small groups or large-scale samples. Age, sex, social background
and other aspects of identity are important, as these factors are known to influence the kind
of language used. The topic of conversation and the characteristics of the social setting
(e.g. the level of formality) are also highly relevant, as are the personal qualities of the
informants (e.g. their fluency and consistency). For larger studies, scrupulous attention has
been paid to the sampling theory employed, and in all cases, decisions have to be made
about the best investigative techniques to use.
Today, researchers often tape-record informants. This enables the linguist's claims about
the language to be checked, and provides a way of making those claims more accurate
('difficult' pieces of speech can be listened to repeatedly). But obtaining naturalistic, good-
quality data is never easy. People talk abnormally when they know they are being
recorded, and sound quality can be poor. A variety of tape-recording procedures have thus
been devised to minimise the 'observer's paradox' (how to observe the way people behave
when they are not being observed). Some recordings are made without the speakers being
aware of the fact - a procedure that obtains very natural data, though ethical objections
must be anticipated. Alternatively, attempts can be made to make the speaker forget about
the recording, such as keeping the tape recorder out of sight, or using radio microphones.
A useful technique G is to introduce a topic that quickly involves the speaker, and
stimulates a natural language style (e.g. asking older informants about how times have
changed in their locality).
An audio tape recording does not solve all the linguist's problems, however. Speech is
often unclear and ambiguous. Where possible, therefore, the recording has to be
supplemented by the observer's written comments on the non-verbal behaviour of the
participants, and about the context in general, A facial expression, for example, can
dramatically alter the meaning of what is said. Video recordings avoid these problems to a
large extent, but even they have limitations (the camera cannot be everywhere), and
transcriptions always benefit from any additional commentary provided by an observer.
Linguists also make great use of structured sessions, in which they systematically ask their
informants for utterances that describe certain actions, objects or behaviours. With a
bilingual informant, or through use of an interpreter, it is possible to use translation
techniques (‘How do you say table in your language?'). A large number of points can be
covered in a short time, using interview worksheets and questionnaires. Often, the
researcher wishes to obtain information about just a single variable, in which case a
restricted set of questions may be used: a particular feature of pronunciation, for example,
can be elicited by asking the informant to say a restricted set of words. There are also
several direct methods of elicitation, such as asking informants to fill in the blanks in a
substitution frame (e.g. I_see a car), or feeding them the wrong stimulus for correction ('Is it
possible to say / no can see?').
Write the correct letter A-G in boxes 1-5 on your answer sheet.
Questions 6-10
Complete the table below.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Questions 11-14
Complete the summary of paragraph G below.