FAU JJ 2024 MIDTERM SOLUTION
FAU JJ 2024 MIDTERM SOLUTION
FAU JJ 2024 MIDTERM SOLUTION
SECTION A
1. D
Tutorial note: Confirmation of completeness of recording in the company’s accounting records
is a particular problem for an auditor where the internal controls are not operating effectively.
This is because lack of adequate controls leads to systems objectives not being met and there is
often a lack of an audit trail to evidence the inception of transactions through to completion.
2. C
Tutorial note: As the auditor has concluded that the internal controls are not effective, the
approach to the final audit must be fully substantive. This will involve extensive testing of
transactions for the whole accounting period in addition to the verification of the items in the
statement of financial position and a review of the financial statements. The other options do
not allow the necessary substantive procedures to be carried out.
3. B
Tutorial note: The principal purpose of the engagement letter is to clearly define the extent of
the responsibilities of the auditor and so minimise the possibility of any misunderstanding
between the client and the auditor in this respect.
4. A
Tutorial note: Analytical procedures must be applied in risk assessment at the planning stage of
the audit. They must also be used in the overall review stage at the end of the audit when
forming an overall conclusion as to whether the financial statements are consistent with the
auditor’s knowledge of the business. Analytical procedures can be used as substantive
procedures to reduce detection risk, but this is not a requirement.
5. C
Tutorial note: A management representation letter contains confirmations from management
on matters relevant only to the audit of the financial statements subject to audit. It should
therefore be retained on the current audit file.
6. A
Tutorial note: ICEQs contain key control questions which focus on the objectives of the system
under review.Options B, C and D all focus on the objectives of a payroll system, whereas option
A focuses on a control procedure only.
7. C
Tutorial note: A wages master file must contain standing data which is of continuing importance
for the processing of information and updating of the wages data file for each employee. The
amount of cumulative statutory deductions to date is not of continuing importance; the other
data items are important.
8. D
Tutorial note: It is generally recognised that all three aspects should be reviwed by an internal
audit function.
9. B
Tutorial note: The risk of material misstatement is a function of inherent risk and control risk.
10. C
Tutorial note: Use of test data is essentially a test of controls because it is designed to test the
effectiveness of controls built into a specified computer programme. Test data is normally
processed separately from the client’s normal processing runs; however, it may be processed
simultaneously in certain circumstances.
11. B
Tutorial note: The auditor does not have the right to attend or speak at directors’ meetings and
should not make or take part in any executive decisions on behalf of the company.
12. C
Tutorial note: Control risk and inherent risk are components of the risk of material
misstatement, which is governed by the circumstances of the audit client and therefore is
outside the control of the auditor. Only detection risk is controlled by the auditor.
13. B
Tutorial note: The extent and quality of the communication with the audit client’s staff, will
depend on the personal attributes of audit staff and their individual ability to communicate
effectively. Standard audit programmes should facilitate all the other options
14. B
Tutorial note: Acting on behalf of a client in a dispute is an illustration of an advocacy threat.
Pressure on the performance of an audit is an intimidation threat. Owning shares in a client
company represents a self-interest threat.
15. C
Tutorial note: The same statistical probability is a feature of all random selection methods. The
selection of monetary units characterises value weighted selection. Stratification of the
population may improve audit efficiency regardless of the selection method.
SECTION B
The components of audit risk are inherent risk, control risk and detection risk.
Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transaction, account balance or
disclosure to a misstatement which could be material (either individually or when aggregated with other
misstatements) before consideration of any related controls.
Control risk is the risk that a misstatement which could occur in an assertion about a class of
transaction, account balance or disclosure and which could be material (either individually or when
aggregated with other misstatements) will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely
basis by the entity’s internal control.
Detection risk is the risk that audit procedures performed by the auditor to reduce audit risk to an
acceptably low level will not detect a misstatement which exists and which could be material (either
individually or when aggregated with other misstatements).
Aquamarine has ordered $1.2m of plant and machinery, two-thirds of which may not have been
received by the year end. Only assets which physically exist at the year end should be included in
property, plant and equipment (PPE). If items not yet delivered have been capitalised, PPE will be
overstated.
Consideration will also need to be given to depreciation and when this should commence. If
depreciation is not appropriately charged when the asset is available for use, this may result in assets
and profit being over or understated.
The company has borrowed $1.2m from the bank via a five-year loan. This loan needs to be correctly
analysed between current and non-current liabilities in order to ensure correct presentation in the
statement of financial position.
Also, as the level of debt has increased, there should be additional finance costs. There is a risk that this
has been omitted from the statement of profit or loss leading to understated finance costs and
overstated profit.
The land and buildings are to be revalued at the year end; it is likely that the revaluation surplus/deficit
will be material. The revaluation needs to be carried out and recorded in accordance with IAS 16
Property, Plant and Equipment; otherwise non-current assets may be incorrectly valued.
Receivables for the year to date are considerably higher than the prior year. If this continues to the year
end, there is a risk that some receivables may be overvalued as they are not recoverable. If there is no
write off or allowance for credit losses, profit for the year will be overstated.
Aquamarine is planning to make approximately 60 employees redundant after the year end. The timing
of this announcement has not been confirmed; if it is announced to the staff before the year end, a
redundancy provision will be required at the year end (IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and
Contingent Assets). Failure to make adequate provision will result in an understatement of provisions
and expenses.
(b)
Engagement letters for recurring/existing clients should be revised if any of the following factors are
present:
• Any indication that the entity misunderstands the objective and scope of the audit, as this
misunderstanding would need to be clarified.
• Any revised or special terms of the audit engagement, as these would require inclusion in the
engagement letter.
• A recent change of senior management or significant change in ownership. The letter is signed
by a director on behalf of those charged with governance; if there have been significant changes
in management they need to be made aware of what the audit engagement letter includes.
• A significant change in nature or size of the entity’s business. The approach taken by the auditor
may need to change to reflect the change in the entity and this should be clarified in the
engagement letter.
• A change in legal or regulatory requirements. The engagement letter is a contract; hence if legal
or regulatory changes occur, the contract could be out of date.
• A change in the financial reporting framework adopted in the preparation of the financial
statements. The engagement letter clarifies the role of auditors and those charged with
governance, it identifies the reporting framework of the financial statements and if this changes,
the letter requires updating.
• A change in other reporting requirements. Other reporting requirements may be stipulated in
the engagement letter; hence if these change , the letter should be updated.
• Prior year financial statements: Provides information in relation to the size of Milky Way Co as
well as the key accounting policies, disclosure notes and whether the audit opinion was
modified or not.
• Discussions with the previous auditors/access to their files: Provides information on key issues
identified during the prior year audit as well as the audit approach adopted.
• Prior year report to management: If this can be obtained from the previous auditors or from
management, it can provide information on the internal control deficiencies noted last year. If
these have not been rectified by management, they could arise in the current year audit as well
and may impact the audit approach.
• Milky Way’s accounting systems notes/procedural manuals: Provides information on how each
of the key accounting systems operates and this will be used to identify areas of potential
control risk and help determine the audit approach.
• Discussions with management: Provides information in relation to the business, any important
issues which have arisen or changes to accounting policies from the prior year.
• Review of board minutes: Provides an overview of key issues which have arisen during the year
and how those charged with governance have addressed them.
• Current year budgets and management accounts: Provides relevant financial information for the
year to date. It will help the auditor during the planning stage for preliminary analytical review
and risk identification.
• Milky Way’s website: Recent press releases from the company may provide background on the
business during the year as this will help in identifying the key audit risks.
• Financial statements of competitors: This will provide information about Milky Way’s
competitors, in relation to their financial results and their accounting policies. This will be
important in assessing Milky Way’s performance in the year and also when undertaking the
going concern review.
4. (a) Definition
Evaluations of financial information through analysis of plausible relationships among both financial and
non-financial data. Analytical procedures also encompass such investigation as is necessary of identified
fluctuations or relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant information or that differ from
expected values by a significant amount.
(b) Analytical procedures
Analytical procedures help identify inconsistencies, unusual transactions or events, and amounts, ratios
and trends that indicate matters that may have audit implications.
Unusual or unexpected relationships that are identified may assist the auditor in identifying risks of
material misstatement.
Analytical procedures performed as risk assessment procedures may therefore assist in:
• identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement by identifying aspects of the entity
of which the auditor was unaware; or
• understanding how inherent risk factors, such as change, affect susceptibility of assertions to
misstatement.
5. Concept
Judgements about materiality are affected by the size (quantity) or nature (quality) of a misstatement,
or a combination of both.
The concept of materiality is applied by the auditor both in planning and performing the audit and in
evaluating the effect of misstatements on the financial statements and in forming the opinion in the
auditor’s report.
The auditor determines materiality for the financial statements as a whole when establishing the overall
audit strategy.
Performance materiality
The auditor determines performance materiality for purposes of assessing the risks of material
misstatement and determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures.
Performance materiality is the amount set by the auditor at less than materiality for the financial
statements as a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of
uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
Performance materiality is used for testing individual transactions, account balances and disclosures.