Philosophers in the French Revolution
Philosophers in the French Revolution
Philosophers in the French Revolution
During the Age of Enlightenment, certain changes were observed in logical ideals
as society gradually developed a theory of logic by integrating science and
knowledge. They are respectively 1) The establishment of rational explanation of
the mysteries of nature begins with denial of the divine and supernatural. 2)
According to the philosopher Immanuel Kant, if nature is governed by law, then
there must be certain laws for the discipline of the state and society. According to
Kant, the task of philosophers is to liberate and discover these rules. 3)
Rationalizing human experience and placing rationalism above theology. 4)
Judging the medieval feudal system and superstitious religious beliefs in the
light of logic. Hence, the Enlightenment helped popularize Rationalism in
eighteenth-century thought. That is, in the century of the Enlightenment,
rationalism ushered in a new humanism, whose ultimate aim was to influence the
state and human welfare.
1) The first phase is from 1715 to 1750. Robert Boyle's theory of blood circulation
in the human body, Sir Isaac Newton's theory of gravitation gained great fame in
the field of science during this period.
At this time, the English philosopher John Locke published his 'Social Contract
Theory' and preached that the position of the king of the empire is not governed
by the command of God, the emperor can only rule by the social contract by
gaining power from the people. As a result, philosophers like Locke began to
question the authority of the medieval regime. French thought was particularly
influenced by its influence. Philosophers and thinkers of the first phase began to
attack orthodox Catholicism's orthodoxy and religious intolerance. Attacks on
Catholicism led to the decline of the influence of the Catholic Church in European
society and the development of independent thought in society.
3) The third phase i.e. between 1774 and 1789 AD organized influence of thinkers
and philosophers began to materialize in different areas of Europe. Enlightened
by philosophers, Turgot, Necker and economists in France began trying to reform
the financing process. During this period philosophers began to spread their
doctrines to the masses through various journals, clubs and pubs. Writers such
as Renal and Condorcet published various pamphlets to promote the doctrines of
the philosophers in simple language to the public.
There was no communication. Thirdly, while the philosophers had direct contact
with the educated bourgeois leadership, the philosophers had no direct contact
with the masses, the rural masses and the working people. It is therefore highly
unreasonable to attribute the contribution of philosophers entirely to the cause of
revolution.
Among those historians who did not give importance to the contribution of
philosophers as the reason for the revolution, the Marxist historians such as
Lefebvre, Mathieu, Monstephens and Welle etc. are notable. Monstephens
commented that the cause of the French Revolution was mainly economic and
political, with no direct contribution of the philosophers behind the revolution.
Economic theorists argued that philosophers did not advocate the transformation
of social order through bloodshed, and even Rousseau himself was opposed to
bloodshed and murder. As a result, philosophers had no contact with the
leadership of the revolution, publicly criticizing the flaws of the conventional
system. Historian George Lefebvre said in his book 'The coming of the French
revolution' that the contribution of philosophers in the French revolution of 1789
was very minor, the cause of the revolution should be attributed to the king's
Philosophers contributed to the French Revolution
financial mismanagement, administrative weakness and incompetence.
According to him, the importance of the bourgeoisie should be particularly
attributed to the French Revolution. However, a class of historians, especially
George Rude in his book 'Resolution Europe', said that in order to make a
revolution, apart from economic distress, social discontent, lack of political and
social desire, many other elements are needed. There were no political parties in
France at the time, so enlightened philosophers helped to expand the psychology
of the revolution. David Thomson in his book 'Europe since Napoleon' says that
by 1789 the people of France had become revolutionary for the overall state of
society, but behind this the writings of philosophers did not play a very important
role rather the writings of philosophers indirectly influenced every level of the
revolution.
But historians such as Edmund Burke, Setobria, Tein and Rustan have seen
philosophers as directly important to the revolution. Setobria and Rustan argue
that philosophers cannot be expected to directly participate in revolutions or
dictate the course of revolutions. However, the main duty of the philosophers was
to judge and analyze the injustices and injustices of the state and society using
rationalism. Historian Madela remarked that humble respect for tradition was the
mainstay of the Old Tantras, so philosophers and thinkers constantly criticized
the Old Traditions, creating a rift in the autocratic regime. Philosophers at this
time preached that if nature is governed by rules, then the state must be
governed by rules, so these philosophers began to try to discover new rules by
applying rationality. As a result, the anti-monarchy movement in France gradually
took the form of a revolution.