Unit-4
Unit-4
Unit-4
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The terms ‘image’ and ‘imagery’ have a wide range of meaning and correlations.
An image need not signify a mental picture alone. Images can be literal, perceptual
or conceptual. Again, they can be visual, auditory, olfactory, tactile, abstract or
kinesthetic. That is why the term, ‘imagery’ is used to suggest the representation
of sensory or extra-sensory experience through the medium of language. Poets
may fuse different kinds of images to produce the desired poetic effects. Indeed,
the images in a poem may not be readily classifiable, since they may merge into
one another or even overlap. All poetry works through images. It is through
images that a poet depersonalizes and universalizes his experience. No matter
how personal an account, a poetic statement, because it works in and through 95
Modes of Creative Writing images, becomes a general statement. An image thus acts as an interface between
the reader and the poet.
The term, ‘symbol’, is derived from the Greek work, ‘symbolon’ meaning mark,
token or sign. It is an animate or inanimate object signifying or standing for
some other thing. It is different from an allegorical sign in that whereas a symbol
exists, an allegorical sign is only arbitrary. For instance, the lion symbolizes
strength and courage, and a dove peace. Likewise, even actions and features
such as a clenched fist, and arms raised above the head symbolize aggressiveness
and surrender. A symbol helps the poet to express complex, mixed or intense
feelings. Since a poem is essentially a symbolic mode of expression it is through
symbols alone that a poet articulates his feelings. They should, however, be
used judiciously, because their excessive use can also harm a poem, dissipate its
impact on the reader’s mind.
Diction is a writer’s particular choice of words and style. This choice is especially
difficult in poetry where words often take on additional meanings depending
upon the context. For most of us, English is a second language, so we should be
specially aware of the precise meanings of the words we use. We should aim at
lucidity of expressions rather than obscurity or complexity. The idea is to use
words in such a way that your thoughts are exactly transferred to the mind of the
reader.
The simplest definition of metaphor, as also the oldest one, is that it is a shortened
or an implied simile. A simile makes explicit comparison between two unlike
things indicated by the words, ‘like’, ‘as’ or ‘than’. When we say, ‘Arjun fights
like a lion’, we are using a simile in which a comparison is made by using the
word, ‘like’. Where such a comparison is made without using such words as
‘like’ or ‘as’ ⎯ as in the following example, ‘On the battlefield Arjun is a lion’ –
we are using a metaphor. In other words, when a speaker says that something is,
or is equivalent to, something in most ways actually unlike it, he is using a
figure of speech called a metaphor. In other words, it is a description of one
thing in terms of another. Comparison between two things, unlike each other, is
the basis of both simile and metaphor. The point(s) of analogy must be logically
clear, whether the comparison is explicitly stated, as in a simile, or only implied,
as in a metaphor.
4.2 IMAGERY
Whatever else they share in common, prose and verse use images differently in
their narrative and lyric modes. Imagery in prose rarely, if ever, attains to the
power of a general statement with universal significance, as it does in poetry.
This is partly due to the fact that the lyric mode functions in and through images.
Often, an image is dismantled and reassembled in the course of a single poem;
equally often, the reverse procedure is adopted. The greatest master in the use of
images, among prose writers, Franz Kafka, seems to actually feel and think
through images: with the result that they assume an allegorical universality that
most other symbols used by other prose writers cannot even begin to pretend to
emulate: The Castle, The Trial, ‘Metamorphosis’ The Country Doctor and the
killing-machine in ‘In the Penal Settlement’ are some good examples. Consider
the following lines from A.K. Ramanujan’s ‘Of Mothers, among other things’:
96
………… Imagery and Symbols
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
(Check your answer with that given at the end of the Unit)
4.3 SYMBOLS
Poetry, like music, conveys ‘feeling’. We all experience half-expressed feelings⎯
intense jubilation, deep despair, hair-pulling, vaulting ambition, dark depression,
high exaltation in our own lives. But if we are asked to express our feelings,
most of us will just mumble. We find language too inadequate to express, to the
exact degree, our feelings. But poets somehow manage to find words to express
their feelings. They use various devices to catch the intensity ⎯soft rhythms for
soft feeling, jagged rhythms for intellectualized feeling, exalted rhythms for higher
exaltation, lilting and cooing for courtship, etc. etc. Naturally, the reader will
miss a good deal if he does not keep pace with the suggestive rhythm of the
verse. But some feelings are lawless. They are too complex to keep to the rhythm.
Symbols, float between a very concrete image at one extreme end and a very
intense feeling at the other. A symbol half-reveals and half-conceals its meaning.
It employs a concrete image only to hide an intensity of meaning which has
become too hurtful to state explicitly. It draws on the conventions of language.
For instance, a ‘wolf’ is conventionally believed to be a killer; unlike a fox who
is believed to be a slinker, though he could also kill. In other words, a symbol
employs ‘association’, not direct meanings, to carry out its double function of
half-revealing and half-concealing its meaning. A good symbol enriches the
meaning by concealment. The cleverer the concealment, the richer the meaning.
Look at these lines:
The paper is whiter
For these black lines.
(Wallace Stevens)
98
This is an image without specific meaning; nevertheless, it has a sufficient Imagery and Symbols
meaning complete in itself.
I shall show you fear in a handful of dust.
(T.S.Eliot)
Such self-sufficience of meaning is a mark of the highest creative genius. How
a concrete image becomes meaningful is hard to explain; but we can vaguely
explain the process as ‘suggestion’ ⎯what our Poetics has described through
terms like ‘Dhwani’ or ‘Vjyanjana’. Most poets are aware of a faculty which
can see meaning in inanimate objects, e.g. ‘stone’ for hard, cold, dead
unresponsiveness. They employ these meanings by strengthening the force of
the context. But not always!
O Rose, thou art sick.
The invisible worm….
Has found out thy bed
Of crimson joy,….
(Blake)
There is here no contextual support. Yet, this poem seems to sum up the sickness
of the world. The word, ‘rose’, is an image of health, freshness and hope, sufficient
in meaning. It is an ‘image’, yet acts as a symbol.
What wondrous life is this I lead!
Ripe apples drop about my head;
The luscious clusters of the vine
Upon my mouth do crush their wine;
The nectarine, the curious peach,
Into my hands themselves do reach;
Stumbling on melons, as I pass,
Ensnared with flowers, I fall on grass.
(Andrew Marvell)
The paradisal experience is revealed in the recurrent images of simple natural
rural pleasures. The consistent, reiterative, repetitive images of natural joy create
(‘evoke’) an atmosphere (‘context’) of well-being. No single image is a ‘symbol’,
but cumulatively they create (‘evoke’) a whole context of a paradise on Earth.
The passage thus becomes ‘symbolic’.
4.4 METAPHOR
The command of metaphor has been held to be the hall mark of a poet and so its
importance to the creation of a poem cannot be overemphasized. Metaphor is
not a mere rhetorical device⎯ a figure of speech⎯but a means of making a
poem highly evocative and thus enlarging its significance and power. The issues
that the use of metaphor in poetry raises are complex in that the metaphor, in the
modern view, is a ‘stereoscope of ideas’.
Although, superficially, the distinction between simile and metaphor looks simple,
it is not really so. They differ in significance. Simile merely joins two separate 99
Modes of Creative Writing entities. The metaphor, on the other hand, attempts an identification or fusion
of two objects to make a new one that shares in some degree the attributes or
qualities of both. While in a simile the comparison is straightforward and often
prosaic, in a metaphor an altogether new kind of association is created by
discovering and combining resemblances between two otherwise dissimilar
objects. Simile being more explicit than metaphor is, therefore, less evocative.
However, it must be remembered that a metaphor has its origin in a simile.
If we compare the poem of Sir Walter Raleigh given above with the following
poem by Emily Dickinson we will notice that, while in the former, metaphor has
been employed for merely noting of a likeness between life and a stage-play, the
latter uses the metaphor ‘Iron Horse’ for train as the central concept of the poem:
4.6.2 Meter
Rhythmic patterns make a poem move onward and it is the function of meter to
effect this rhythm. As meter occurs in the course of our reading or reciting, let’s
call it an ‘event’. However, this even, by itself, may not register in our minds.
Only a repeated succession of these stimuli, like repeated pulses of energy, will
help us discern a regular rhythm.
Once it is established, it builds up a momentum of its own and the verse is impelled
onward by the force of this rhythm. A rhythm in this way creates an expectancy,
a metrical expectancy to be precise, and you gradually grow accustomed to the
syllabic runs and pauses and find yourself actively participating in the rhythmic
pattern of the poem. You also begin to recognize the rhythm as something that
contributes a tangible ‘body’ and ‘form’ to an otherwise abstract looking poem.
If verse is said to march, it must be marching with a measured or measurable
stride which, in prosody, is called ‘the foot’. Before we learn to measure the
foot, we need to distinguish the syllable which is the smallest unit of language.
Each syllable corresponds to a chest pulse which may be either weak or strong.
The relative strength of the chest pulse is responsible for the stressed and
unstressed syllables.
Four kinds of meter
These are the commonest metres in English verse. The analysis of metrical
patterns, is known as scansion. The fundamental unit, that is the foot, is composed
of one accented syllable in combination with (usually)one (or more) unaccented
syllables. A typical example in English verse would be: ‘Is this/the face/that
launched/a thous/sand ships?’ This particular line is in iambic pentameter because
it is composed of five iambic feet, each iamb being a metrical foot consisting of
an unaccented syllable followed by an accented syllable.
Other types of feet are:
Anapaest, which is composed of two unaccented syllables followed by an
accented syllable
The word, anapaest, itself is used to give the impression of swiftness, and even
of action as in the following line:
‘With a leap/and a bound/the swift/anapaests throng’ (Coleridge)
Trochee, which has one accented syllable followed by one unaccented syllable
as in hardly Dactyl which has one accented syllable followed by two unaccented
syllables, as in merrily.
4.7 INNOVATIONS
In the 20th and 21st centuries there has been a great deal of experimentation in
104 poetry as well as in music and in the other arts. It is a reflection of the revolutionary
discoveries and new ways of thinking and looking at our world. From Freud’s Imagery and Symbols
and Jung’s discoveries, scientific discoveries and explorations of the most startling
kind, technological innovations that changed the dimensions and possibilities of
our physical universe, the impinging of Hindu and Buddhist thought and
consciousness, the sense of doom created by the threat of nuclear war, experienced
in limited but horrifying form by the inhabitants of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, the
feminist revolution⎯all these have been unprecedented developments in our
time. These have had the effect of making artists and writers seek new forms,
new ways of stimulating their vision and the fragmentation to which they have
been subjected by them. They have advocated the use of ‘the subjective image’
(an image drawn from the unconscious which defies logic). In painting, the
work of Picasso spelt a new way of seeing things⎯shape, form, light, objects,
figures ⎯ that led to a new kind of expression. Cubism, and later Surrealism
(whose most influential exponent was Salvador Dali), also had an enormous
influence on literature.
One of the first expressions of this new, ‘liberated’ way of seeing was the tendency
to reject traditional, classical verse forms and metrical patterns. Poets began to
write Free Verse. They have now come to rely on ‘natural speech rhythms, of
stressed and unstressed syllables’, instead of any regular meter or line-length.
Along with Free Verse, many other experiments were attempted. The poets have
even stopped using formal punctuation and capital letters at the beginning of a
line or a new verse paragraph. One of the poets who became famous for this
kind of writing was the American poet, E.E. Cummings, who always signed
himself e..e cummings. He died in 1962, but his influence has been considerable.
Consider the following lines:
My father moved through dooms of love
through sames of am; through have to give….
Even their grammar and sentence-construction seem strange. Yet, somehow, we
understand the poet’s meaning. He makes us share his fresh, ecstatic, lyrical,
song-like language. Cummmings and some other poets feel that punctuation and
capital letters give only formal importance to a line or a word.
An Indian poet who drops formal punctuation, so as to reinforce the hypnotic
and incantary quality of his experience and expression, is Arun Kolatkar, who
writes in both Marathi and English. In a poem called ‘The Boatride’, he makes
us see the smallest details with heightened perception, and creates a hypnotic
quality in which the seer sees more rather than less. Consider the following
lines:
two sisters
that came
last
when the boat
nearly started
seated side
by side
athwart 105
Modes of Creative Writing on a plank
have not
spoken
hands in lap
they have
been looking
past the boatman’s
profile.
splicing
the wrinkles
of his saline
face
and loose ends
of the sea.
You would have here noticed the absence of punctuation, capital letters, rhyme
schemes, etc. Kolatkar avoids them to express his own inner compulsions and
his unique vision, which is surrealistic⎯ a term signifying an attempt in art and
literature ‘to express the workings of the unconscious mind’ and in which
imagination and reality are fused, in which contradictions in logic are acceptable
to the imagination, ordinary concepts of time and space do not operate, and
everything is seen with an innocent eye. This kind of innovativeness which
springs from inner need is genuine. It is not an attempt to attract attention or be
different, but is a genuine way of seeing, feeling and being different.
Poems now simultaneously disclose and conceal their meanings. Some poets
have experimented with ‘the decomposition or breaking up of language, the
dismantling of normal syntax and word usage, so as to create a new language
field’. In a way, you may say that life is like this, with all sorts of different things
going on at the same time, and coming together, or separating.
4.8 SUMMING UP
In this Unit we’ve spoken about the importance of using symbols and images to
enhance the poetic effect. We’ve also spoken about metrical structures and how
innovations in poetry are experimenting with form and content of poetry.