5129-Article Text-18910-1-10-20210208
5129-Article Text-18910-1-10-20210208
5129-Article Text-18910-1-10-20210208
2, 2020 |47 – 53
Abstract. This study aimed to examine the effect of adherence to clinical outcomes and the
quality of life of primary hypertension patients in pharmacy. The studywas conducted cross
sectionally involved 60 patients at one of the pharmacies in Medan, Indonesia. Adherence
was obtained in the form of adherence levels measured using the MMAS-8 questionnaire,
clinical outcomes assessed by measuring a patient's blood pressure, and quality of life
assessed using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Then the data were analyzed using the
Spearmen rho test. Patients who participated in the study consisted of 24 men and 36
women. Almost patient has low adherence with blood pressure mean of 156/ 90 mmHg.
The patient's quality of life was 77.7%. Adherence has a significant relationship to clinical
outcomes (p<0.05) with a strong correlation of r= -0.745. Adherence has a relationship to
quality of life (p<0.05) with moderate correlation r= 0.554. This study concluded that
adherence has a correlation with clinical outcomes and the quality of life of primary
hypertension patients.
Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaruh kepatuhan terhadap outcome
klinis dan kualitas hidup pasien hipertensi primer di Apotek. Penelitian dilakukan secara
cross sectional dengan melibatkan 60 pasien di salah satu apotek di kota Medan,
Indonesia. Data kepatuhan diperoleh dalam bentuk tingkat kepatuhan yang diukur
menggunakan kuesioner MMAS-8, outcome klinis dinilai dengan mengukur tekanan darah
pasien, dan data kualitas hidup dinilai menggunakan kuesioner EQ-5D-3L. Kemudian data
dianalisis menggunakan uji Spearmen rho. Pasien yang mengikuti penelitian terdiri dari 24
laki-laki dan 36 perempuan. Rata-rata pasien memiliki kepatuhan rendah dengan tekanan
darah rata-rata sebesar 156/ 90 mmHg. Kualitas hidup pasien rata-rata diperoleh sebesar
77,7%. Kepatuhan memiliki hubungan yang signifikan terhadap outcome klinis (p<0,05)
dengan korelasi kuat r= -0,745. Kepatuhan juga memiliki korelasi terhadap kualitas hidup
(p<0,05) dengan korelasi cukup r= 0.554). Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa
kepatuhan pengobatan mempunyai korelasi dengan outcome klinis dan kualitas hidup
pasien hipertensi primer.
*Corresponding author at: Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara,
Medan, Indonesia
Copyright © 2020 Published by Talenta Publisher, Print ISSN : 2615-6199, Online ISSN : 2620-3731
Journal Homepage: https://talenta.usu.ac.id/index.php/idjpcr
Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research (IDJPCR) Vol. 03, No. 2, 2020 48
1. Introduction
Data from WHO in 2017 showed that there were 17.9 million people in the world who died
from cardiovascular disease or about 31% of the total deaths worldwide [1]. Hypertension is one
of the risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In 2015, an increase in blood pressure resulted in
9.4 million deaths and was a disease that increased Disability-Adjusted Life Years [2]. WHO
data for 2019 estimated that at least 1.13 billion people in the world suffer from hypertension.
The treatment of hypertension in Asian countries is very important because the prevalence of
hypertension continuesly to increase, including in Indonesia [3]. Indonesia Basic Health
Research in 2018 reported that the number of hypertension patients increased from 25.8% in
2013 to 34.1% in 2018 based on blood pressure measurements in the age group 18 and older [4].
High quality medicines are already widely prescribed for patients, but there are more than 50%
of non-adherence patients. In asimptomatic diseases such as hypertension, the non-adherence
can reach 80% [15]. Low levels of patient adherence to treatment of hypertension are the main
problems of complications, decreased effectiveness of treatment, and resulting in increased
mortality [6], [8]. Non-adherence lead to uncontrolled blood pressure. In United States, only
50% of patients had controlled their blood pressure. Non-adherence patients are more likely to
experience of cardiovascular complications indeed death compared with the adherence patients
[9]. Some factors affected non-adherence were reported by several studies, including age,
presence or absence of comorbid diseases, number of medicines taken, and patients knowledge
[10], [11], [12]. The patient quality of life is also influenced by factors related to physical,
emotional, social conditions as well as factors related to medication treatment [13].
Hypertension also related to quality of life. Patients with hypertension tend to have a poor
quality of life compared to patients with normal blood pressure [14], [15]. The poor quality of
life due to they have the risk of complications and adverse effects form medicines. The main
factor affected the quality of life of hypertensive patients are mental and emotional conditions
[14].
There are several studies related to adherence and the quality of life of hypertensive patients, but
very limited data is obtained from pharmacies. This study aimed to examine the effect of
adherence to clinical outcomes and the quality of life of primary hypertension patients in
pharmacy.
This was an observational study through cross sectional design in one of pharmacies in Medan,
North Sumatera, Indonesia on July-Augustus 2020. The study was conducted on hypertensive
Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research (IDJPCR) Vol. 03, No. 2, 2020 49
patients who were redeemed the medical prescription at the pharmacy and meet the inclusion
criteria (patient diagnosed with primary hypertension more than 2 months, aged older than 18
years, and signed the inform consent. This study has been approved by the Ethical Committee
of the Health Research, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Sumatera Utara No. 2175/VII/SP/2020.
Adherence was measured by the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8)
questionnaire. The study used MMAS-8 version of Indonesia contained 8 questions with closed
dichotomous (yes/no) answer. The questionnaire has been validated with high reliability and
validity well [16]. Respons of the questions were scored from 0 to 8 for adherence. Total score
were translated into 3 category, they were high adherence (score 8), medium adherence (score 6
to <8), and low adherence (score <6).
Clinical outcome was assed by blood pressure measure using digital blood pressure device. The
outcome was recorded as systol and diastol. The number was used to interpret clinical outcome
to adherence scale.
Quality of life was measured by EQ-5D-3L consist of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual
activities, pain/ discomfort, and anxiety/ depression), and has 3 levels (no problems, some
problems, and extreme problems) of each dimension. Health state was converted to utility score.
EQ-5D index score was measured using UK value set [17]. Utility range of EQ-5D from 0.0 (the
worst health) to 1.0 (the best health).
The correlated data were adherence versus clinical outcome and adherence versus quality of life.
The value of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were obtained by the mean of blood pressure
measurements. EQ-5D-3L assessment was performed by precentage of quality of life.
Furthermore, data analysis was displayed using SPSS version of 22 by Spearmen rho test.
With regard to adherence, almost patients had a low adherence (52.6%) with blood pressure
mean of 156/90 mmHg. Only 22.8% of patients were highly adherence. Table 2 displyed the
correlation of adherence with clinical outcomes.
medication had two times more likely adhere compared to those patients with less than three
years. In developing countries, patients with high adherence were the most important challenge
to maintan their adherence understanding [21]. Mouraet al. (2016) reported that personal
reasons become the highest factors (70.3%) contributed to non-adherence, while non-
pharmacological dan pharmacological treatment contributed at 15.9% nd 21%, respectively
[22]. The global burden of hypertension described systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and
diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg or antihypertensive treatment was estimated to increase
from 918 million in year 2000 to 1.56 billion in 2025 [23]. Based on Table 3, patient's quality of
life was 77.7%.
For further research, needed to emphasize the patients adherence for improving clinical
outcomes and quality of life.
Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research (IDJPCR) Vol. 03, No. 2, 2020 52
4. Conclusion
This study concluded that adherence has a correlation with clinical outcomes and the quality of
life of primary hypertension patients.
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful thank to Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Sumatera Utara for the
facilities support.
REFERENCES
[1] Ministry of health of Indonesia. Indonesia health profile 2016. Jakarta: Data and
Information Center of the Health Ministry of Republic of Indonesia, 2017. 102p.
[2] WHO. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases. Switzerland: WHO, 2014. xiv
p.
[3] PERKI. Guidelines for management of dyslipidemia. Jakarta: Centra Communications,
2017. 10-14 p.
[4] Ministry of health of Indonesia. Health Research 2018, Jakarta: Health Ministry of
Republic of Indonesia, 2018. 156-160 p.
[5] M.T. Brown, J. Brussell, S. Dutta, K. Davis, S. Strong, S. Mathew. “Medication
Adherence: Truth and Consequences,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol.
351, no. 4, pp. 387-399. 2016.
[6] A.P.F. Maciel, H.B. Pimenta, A.P. Caldeira. “Quality of life and medication adherence
in hypertensive patients,” Acta Paul Enferm, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 542-548. 2016.
[7] C.D. Barbosa, M.M. Balp, K. Kulich, N. Germain, D. Rofail. “A Literature Review to
Explore the Link between Treatment Satisfaction and Adherence, Complience, and
Persistence.” Patient Preference and Adherence, vol. 6, pp. 39-48. 2012.
[8] G.U. Iloh, A.N. Amadi. “Treatment Satisfaction, Medication Adherence, and Blood
Pressure Control among Adult Nigerians with Essential Hypertension,” International
Journal of Health & Allied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 75-81. 2017.
[9] H. G.S. Femida, E. Manias, L. Lal, M. Salas, D.A. Hughes, A. R. Leewing, M. Grubisic.
“Impact of Interventions on Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in
Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review by the ISPOR Medication
Adherence and Persistence Special Interest Group,” Value Health, vol. 16, no. 5, pp.
863-871. 2013.
[10] O. Amaral, C. Chaves, J. Duarte, E. Countinho, P. Nelas, O. Preto. “Treatment
Adherence in Hypertensive Patients-A Cross-sectional Study,” Sociall and Behavioral
Sciences, vol. 171, pp. 1288-1295. 2014.
[11] M. Burnier. “Drug Adherence in Hypertension,” Pharmacological Research., vol. 125,
pp. 142-149. 2017.
[12] S. Boratas, H.F. Kilic. “Evaluation of Medication Adherence in Hypertensive Patients
and Influential Factors,” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. Vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1-5.
2018.
[13] B. Uchmanowicz, A. Chudiak, G. Mazur. “The influence of quallity of life on the level
of adherence to therapeutic recommendations among elderly hypertensive patients”,
Patient Preference and Adherence, vol. 12, pp. 2593-2603. 2018.
[14] M. Amer, N. U. Rahman, S.U.R. Nazir, A. Raza, H. Riaz, M. Sultana, S. Sadeeqa.
“Impact of Pharmacist’s Intervention on Disease Related Knowledge, Medication
Adherence, HRQoL and Control of Blood Pressure Among Hypertensive Patients,” Pak.
J. Pharm. Sci, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 2607-2616. 2018.
[15] Q. Yao, C. Liu, Y. Zhang, L, Xu. “Health-Related Quality of Life of People with Self-
Reported Hypertension: A National Cross-Sectional Survey in China,” International
Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, vol. 16, no. 72, pp. 1-24. 2019.
[16] D.A. Riani, Z. Ikawati, S.A. Kristina. “Validasi 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence
Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research (IDJPCR) Vol. 03, No. 2, 2020 53
Scale versi Indonesia pada pasien hipertensi dewasa di puskesmas kabupaten Sleman
dan kota Yogyakarta,” Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2017.
[17] EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-3L User Guide. Basic Information on How to
Use the EQ-5D-3L Instrument. Netherlands: Euroqol. 2018; 7-14 p.
[18] K. Peltzer, S. Pengpid. “The prevalence and social determinants of hypertension among
adults in Indonesia: a cross-sectional population-based national survey,” International
Journal of Hypertension, pp.1-9. 2018.
[19] B. Everett, A. Zajacova. “Gender differences in hypertension and hypertension
awareness among young adult,” Biodemography Soc. Biol, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1-17. 2015.
[20] S.S.B.E. Silva, S.F.S.B. Oliveira, A.M.G. Pierin. “The control of hypertension in men
and women: a comparative analysis,” Journal of School of Nursing USP, vol. 5, no. 1,
pp.50-58. 2016.
[21] H.S. Mekonnen, M.H. Gebrie, K.H. Eyasu, A.A. Gelagay. “Drug adherence for
antihypertensive medications and its determinants among adult hypertensive patients
attending in chronic clinics of referral hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia,” BMC
Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 18, no. 27, pp. 1-10. 2017.
[22] A.A. Moura, S. Godoy, C.B. Cesarino, I.A.C. Mendes. “Factor determinig non-
adherence to hypertension treatment,” Enfermerfe Global, pp. 27-39. 2016.
[23] M. Burnier, B.M. Egan. “Adherence in Hypertension, A Review of Prevalence, Risk
Factors, Impact, and Management,” AHAjournal, pp.1124-1140. 2019.
[24] M. Mollaoglu, G. Solmaz, M. Mollaoglu. “Adherence to therapy and quality of life in
hypertensive patients,” Acta Clin Croat, vol. 54, pp.438-444. 2015.
[25] A.C.C. Souza, J.W.P. Borges, T.M.M. Moreira. “Quality of Life and Treatment
Adherence in Hyertensive Patientss: systematic review with meta-analysisis,”Revista de
Saude Publica, vol. 50, no. 71, p. pp. 1-14. 2016.
[26] S.H. Zyoud, W. Al-Jabi, W.M. Sweileh, A.H. Wildali, H.M. Saleem, H.A. Aysa, M.A.
Badwan, R. Awang, D.E. Morisky. “Health-related Quality of Life Associated with
Treatment Adherence in Patients with Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study,”
International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 2981-2983. 2013.
[27] E.W. Holt, P. Muntner, C.J. Joyce, L. Webber, M.A.K. Wood. “Health-related Quality
of Life and Antihypertensive Medication Adherence among Older Adults,” Age and
Ageing, vol. 39, pp. 481-487. 2010.