Pil - 30sep24

ABSTRACT
Short summary notes in reference to the previous year

key Questions, Reference book (like KC Saxena) and
other internet sources.
Hemant Patil. Digital Rights Law

GLC LLB – Batch of 2025
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
Summary Notes v14JUNE2024
Page 1 of 52
Contents
Module 1: Introduction to International Law ............................................................................................ 3
Nature, Definition, Origin, and Basis of International Law ....................................................................... 3
Historical Development.................................................................................................................... 3
Definitions and Theories .................................................................................................................. 4
Sources of International Law............................................................................................................... 5
Customary International Law ........................................................................................................... 5
Treaties ......................................................................................................................................... 6
General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations .................................................................... 7
Judicial Decisions and Juristic Writings .............................................................................................. 8
Equity and Resolutions of the General Assembly ................................................................................. 8
Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law ..................................................................... 9
Monistic Theory .............................................................................................................................. 9
Dualistic Theory.............................................................................................................................10
Subjects of International Law .............................................................................................................11
States ..........................................................................................................................................11
International Organizations .............................................................................................................12
Individuals ....................................................................................................................................13
Module 2: Statehood and Recognition ....................................................................................................13
States as Subjects of International Law ...............................................................................................13
Definition and Characteristics of Statehood\ ......................................................................................13
Recognition of States and Governments ...........................................................................................14
State Territory .................................................................................................................................15
Constitution, Acquisition, and Loss of Territory ..................................................................................15
State Jurisdiction ..............................................................................................................................16
State Responsibility ..........................................................................................................................17
Principles of State Responsibility ......................................................................................................17
Consequences of Breach of International Obligations..........................................................................18
Module 3: Law of the Sea and State Responsibility ..................................................................................20
Law of the Sea .................................................................................................................................20
Maritime Zones: Territorial Sea, Contiguous Zone, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone, High Seas
...................................................................................................................................................20
Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries .................................................................................................21
Concept of "Common Heritage of Mankind" .......................................................................................22
International Seabed Mining............................................................................................................23
State Responsibility ..........................................................................................................................24
International Wrongful Acts.............................................................................................................24
Attribution of Conduct to the State ..................................................................................................25
Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness ...........................................................................................26
Reparation for Injury......................................................................................................................27
Module 4: Treaties and International Organizations .................................................................................28
Law of Treaties ................................................................................................................................28
Definition, Kinds, and Essentials ......................................................................................................28
Inception, Interpretation, and Termination of Treaties ........................................................................29
Rights and Duties of Parties ............................................................................................................30
Page 2 of 52
Validity and Enforcement ................................................................................................................31

The United Nations Organization ........................................................................................................32
Principal Organs: General Assembly, Security Council, Economic and Social Council, International Court of
Justice, Secretariat, Trusteeship Council ...........................................................................................32
Functions and Powers.....................................................................................................................34
International Specialized Agencies and NGOs .......................................................................................35
International Labour Organization (ILO) ...........................................................................................35
World Trade Organization (WTO) .....................................................................................................37
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) ...........................................38
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) ..........................................................................................40
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) ..............................................................................41
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)................................................................................41
Amnesty International ....................................................................................................................43
Module 5: Contemporary Issues and Allied Laws .....................................................................................44
Extradition and Asylum .....................................................................................................................44
Principles and Procedures ...............................................................................................................44
Case Studies .................................................................................................................................45
Nationality and Statelessness.............................................................................................................46
Definition and Acquisition of Nationality ............................................................................................46
Loss of Nationality .........................................................................................................................47
Double Nationality .........................................................................................................................48
Diplomatic and Consular Relations ......................................................................................................49
Diplomatic Envoys and Consuls .......................................................................................................49
Privileges and Immunities ...............................................................................................................50
International Health Regulations ........................................................................................................50
World Health Organization (WHO) ....................................................................................................50
Global Health Law Consortium .........................................................................................................51
Communicable Diseases and International Health Regulations (IHR) ....................................................51
Disclaimer ..........................................................................................................................................52
Page 3 of 52
Question Topic Marks Freq Notes

Page
Sources of International Law 12 or High Page 4
13
Powers and Functions of 12 or High Page 33
NHRC 13
Human Rights: Origin and 12 or High Page 3
Development 13
Role of NGOs in Protection of 12 or Medium Page 35
Human Rights 13
Significance of Fundamental 12 or Medium Page 9
Rights and Directive Principles 13
Territorial Sea and High Seas 12 or Medium Page 19

Freedoms 13
Stockholm Conference Impact 12 or Medium Page 41
on Environment 13
De Facto Recognition 5 or 6 High Page 14
International Court of Justice 5 or 6 High Page 32
Legal Nature of Judicial 5 or 6 Medium Page 7
Decisions
Continental Shelf 5 or 6 Medium Page 19
CEDAW 5 or 6 Medium Page 43
Peaceful Settlement of 5 or 6 Medium Page 43
Disputes
Recognition and Withdrawal 5 or 6 Medium Page 14
of Government Recognition
Pacta Sunt Servanda 5 or 6 Medium Page 29
Ozone Depletion 5 or 6 Medium Page 41
Right to Development 5 or 6 Medium Page 45
Magna Carta 5 or 6 Medium Page 8
Equal Pay for Equal Work 5 or 6 Medium Page 47
Land Locked State 5 or 6 Medium Page 19
Module 1: Introduction to International Law

Nature, Definition, Origin, and Basis of International Law
Historical Development
The historical development of public international law is a rich and complex narrative that spans thousands of
years, evolving through various stages influenced by significant historical events, philosophical ideas, and
practical necessities. Here is a comprehensive yet simple explanation:
Early History
Ancient Treaties
The origins of international law can be traced back to ancient civilizations. Early examples include:
 Treaty of Lagash and Umma (circa 2100 BCE): An agreement between two Mesopotamian city-
states, inscribed on a stone block, setting a boundary between their territories.
 Treaty between Ramses II and the Hittites (circa 1258 BCE): An agreement establishing "eternal
peace and brotherhood" between Egypt and the Hittites, dealing with territorial respect and forming a
defensive alliance.
Greek and Roman Contributions
Page 4 of 52
 Greek City-States: The ancient Greeks developed rules for inter-state interactions, which, although
not applied to non-Greek states, resembled modern international community practices.
 Roman Law: The Romans introduced the concept of jus gentium (law of nations), which governed
interactions between Roman citizens and foreigners, based on principles of fairness and natural law.
This concept influenced modern international law.
Medieval Period
Influence of Religion and Philosophy
 Natural Law: During the Middle Ages, the concept of natural law, infused with religious principles by
thinkers like Moses Maimonides and St. Thomas Aquinas, became foundational for the law of nations,
applying to relations between sovereign states.
Renaissance and Early Modern Period
Key Developments
 Hugo Grotius (1583-1645): Often considered the father of modern international law, Grotius
secularized international law in his work "On the Law of War and Peace" (1625), advocating for laws
based on natural rights and mutual agreements rather than force.
 Peace of Westphalia (1648): This series of treaties ended major European wars and established
principles of national sovereignty and equality between states, laying the groundwork for the modern
international legal system.
19th and 20th Centuries
Expansion and Codification
 European Colonization: The concept of sovereignty spread globally through European colonization,
influencing international law's development.
 Post-World War II: The creation of the United Nations (1945) marked a significant expansion of
international law, addressing human rights, economic relations, and global peace and security.
Modern Developments
 Globalization: Since the 1980s, globalization has increased the influence of international and regional
organizations, necessitating the expansion of international law to cover new actors and issues, such as
environmental protection and human rights.
Contemporary Challenges
Enforcement and Adaptation
 Enforcement Difficulties: The lack of a centralized global authority often leads to non-compliance
with international norms, particularly in areas like International Humanitarian Law (IHL).
 Technological Advancements and Climate Change: Modern challenges include addressing
cybersecurity threats and climate change, requiring unprecedented international cooperation.
In summary, the historical development of public international law reflects a continuous evolution from ancient
treaties and philosophical ideas to modern legal frameworks addressing complex global issues. This evolution
has been shaped by significant historical events, the rise of nation-states, and the increasing interconnectedness
of the global community.
Definitions and Theories
Historical Development of Public International Law
The historical development of public international law is a journey through time, reflecting the evolution of human
societies, their interactions, and the need for a structured legal framework to govern these interactions. Here is
a comprehensive overview:
Ancient and Medieval Periods
Early Treaties and Practices
 Ancient Civilizations: The earliest forms of international law can be traced back to ancient civilizations.
For instance, the Treaty of Lagash and Umma (circa 2100 BCE) and the Treaty of Kadesh between
Ramses II and the Hittites (circa 1258 BCE) are among the earliest recorded treaties, establishing peace
and defining boundaries between states.
 Greek and Roman Contributions: The Greeks developed rules for inter-state interactions, while the
Romans introduced the concept of jus gentium (law of nations), which governed interactions between
Roman citizens and foreigners, laying the groundwork for modern international law.
Influence of Religion and Philosophy
 Natural Law: During the Middle Ages, the concept of natural law, influenced by religious principles,
became foundational for the law of nations. Thinkers like St. Thomas Aquinas emphasized that natural
law applied to relations between sovereign states, promoting the idea of a universal moral order.
Renaissance and Early Modern Period
Key Figures and Treaties
 Hugo Grotius (1583-1645): Often considered the father of modern international law, Grotius
secularized international law in his seminal work "On the Law of War and Peace" (1625). He argued for
laws based on natural rights and mutual agreements rather than force.
 Peace of Westphalia (1648): This series of treaties ended the Thirty Years' War in Europe and
established principles of national sovereignty and equality between states, which are fundamental to
modern international law.
19th and 20th Centuries
Expansion and Codification
 European Colonization: The spread of European colonial empires extended the principles of
sovereignty and international law globally, albeit often in a manner that served colonial interests.
Page 5 of 52
 Post-World War II Developments: The establishment of the United Nations in 1945 marked a
significant expansion of international law, addressing issues such as human rights, economic relations,
and global peace and security.
Modern Developments
Globalization and New Challenges
 Globalization: The late 20th and early 21st centuries have seen increased globalization, necessitating
the expansion of international law to cover new actors and issues, such as environmental protection,
human rights, and cybersecurity.
 Technological Advancements and Climate Change: Modern challenges include addressing
cybersecurity threats and climate change, requiring unprecedented international cooperation and legal
frameworks.
Theories of International Law
Naturalist Theory
 Basis: This theory posits that international law is derived from natural law, which is considered binding
on all states due to its inherent moral authority. Early proponents like Francisco de Vitoria and Hugo
Grotius argued that natural law principles should govern international relations.
Positivist Theory
 Basis: Positivists argue that international law is based on the consent of states, expressed through
treaties and customary practices. This theory emphasizes the importance of state sovereignty and the
empirical study of law as it exists, rather than its moral or ethical dimensions.
Realist Theory
 Basis: Realists believe that international law primarily serves the interests of powerful states and is a
tool for maintaining their dominance. They argue that states comply with international law only when it
aligns with their national interests.
Functional Theory
 Basis: This theory suggests that both states and individuals are subjects of international law,
recognizing the roles of various entities, including international organizations and multinational
corporations, in the international legal system.
Eclectic or Grotian Approach
 Basis: This approach, named after Hugo Grotius, combines elements of natural law and positivism. It
argues that international law is based on universal principles of morality and justice, as well as the
consent of states.
Supranational Law
 Basis: Supranational law arises when states cede some of their sovereignty to international institutions,
which then have the authority to make binding laws. The European Union is a prime example of a
supranational legal system.
Conclusion
The historical development of public international law reflects humanity's ongoing efforts to create a structured
and just framework for international relations. From ancient treaties to modern legal theories, international law
has evolved to address the complexities of an interconnected world. Understanding its history and theoretical
foundations is crucial for navigating and shaping the future of global governance.
Sources of International Law
Customary International Law
Customary International Law: Definitions and Theories
Definition
Customary international law consists of rules that arise from the consistent and general practice of states, which
they follow out of a sense of legal obligation, known as opinio juris. It is one of the primary sources of international
law, alongside treaties and general principles of law. Customary international law is recognized by the
International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations, and its member states as binding, even if not codified in
written form.
Elements of Customary International Law
Customary international law is determined through two main elements:
1. State Practice: This refers to the consistent and general practice of states. For a practice to be
considered customary international law, it must be widespread, representative, and consistent among
states.
2. Opinio Juris: This is the belief that a particular practice is carried out of a sense of legal obligation.
States must engage in the practice because they believe they are legally required to do so, not merely
out of habit or convenience.
Recognition and Evidence
The ICJ Statute, in Article 38(1)(b), defines customary international law as "a general practice accepted as law."
Evidence of customary international law can be found in treaties, decisions of national and international courts,
national legislation, opinions of national legal advisors, diplomatic correspondence, and the practice of
international organizations.
Types of Customary International Law
1. General Customary International Law: These are practices accepted as law by a significant number
of states and are binding on all states.
2. Regional Customary International Law: These are practices accepted as law by a specific group of
states within a particular region.
Page 6 of 52
3. Jus Cogens (Peremptory Norms): These are fundamental principles of international law that are
accepted by the international community as non-derogable. Examples include prohibitions against
slavery, genocide, torture, and crimes against humanity. Jus cogens norms are binding on all states and
cannot be overridden by treaties or other international agreements.
Theories of Customary International Law
Naturalist Theory
 Basis: This theory posits that customary international law is derived from natural law principles, which
are inherently binding on all states due to their moral authority. Early proponents like Hugo Grotius
argued that natural law principles should govern international relations.
Positivist Theory
 Basis: Positivists argue that customary international law is based on the consent of states, expressed
through their consistent practices and opinio juris. This theory emphasizes state sovereignty and the
empirical study of law as it exists, rather than its moral or ethical dimensions.
Realist Theory
 Basis: Realists believe that customary international law primarily serves the interests of powerful states
and is a tool for maintaining their dominance. States comply with customary international law when it
aligns with their national interests.
Game Theory Approach
 Basis: This theory, proposed by scholars like Jack L. Goldsmith and Eric A. Posner, uses game theory
to explain how customary international law arises and why states comply with it. According to this
theory, states follow customary international law not out of a sense of legal or moral obligation but
because it aligns with their self-interested policies. Compliance and norms emerge from states' pursuit
of their interests on the international stage, often reflecting a coincidence of interest or coercion rather
than genuine cooperation.
Examples of Customary International Law
1. Doctrine of Non-Refoulement: This principle prohibits the return of refugees to a country where they
may face persecution. It is widely recognized and practiced by states as a binding norm.
2. Immunity for Visiting Heads of State and Diplomats: States generally grant immunity to visiting
heads of state and diplomats, reflecting a consistent practice accepted as law.
3. Maritime Salvage Customs: Practices related to the salvage of ships and cargo at sea have been
followed since ancient times and have evolved into binding customary norms.
4. Peremptory Norms (Jus Cogens): These include prohibitions against slavery, torture, genocide, wars
of aggression, and crimes against humanity. These norms are universally binding and cannot be
derogated.
Conclusion
Customary international law is a fundamental component of the international legal system, derived from the
consistent and general practices of states followed out of a sense of legal obligation. It is recognized and enforced
by international bodies like the ICJ and plays a crucial role in filling gaps left by treaty law. Theories explaining
customary international law range from naturalist and positivist perspectives to realist and game theory
approaches, each offering different insights into why states adhere to these unwritten norms.
Treaties
Treaties as a Source of Public International Law
Definition and Importance
A treaty is a formal, written agreement between sovereign states or international organizations that is governed
by international law. Treaties are considered the principal source of public international law, providing a legal
framework for the conduct of international relations and the establishment of rights and obligations among states.
Legal Framework
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) is the primary international agreement that codifies the
rules governing treaties. According to Article 2(1)(a) of the Vienna Convention, a treaty is defined as "an
international agreement concluded between States in written form and governed by international law, whether
embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments and whatever its particular designation".
Types of Treaties
1. Bilateral Treaties: Agreements between two states.
2. Multilateral Treaties: Agreements between three or more states. These can be global or regional in
scope.
Functions of Treaties
1. Establishing Legal Obligations: Treaties create binding legal obligations for the parties involved. This
can include a wide range of issues such as peace, trade, human rights, and environmental protection.
2. Promoting International Cooperation: Treaties facilitate cooperation among states by providing a
clear legal framework for their interactions. This helps in maintaining international peace and security,
fostering friendly relations, and achieving common goals.
3. Creating International Organizations: Many treaties establish international organizations and define
their functions and powers. Examples include the United Nations Charter and the treaties establishing
the European Union.
Treaty-Making Process
1. Negotiation: Representatives of the states involved negotiate the terms of the treaty. This can involve
multiple rounds of discussions and consultations.
2. Signature: Once the terms are agreed upon, the treaty is signed by the representatives. The signature
indicates the intention of the states to be bound by the treaty, but it does not yet create legal obligations.
Page 7 of 52
3. Ratification: After signing, the treaty must be ratified according to the domestic legal procedures of
each state. Ratification signifies the state's consent to be legally bound by the treaty.
4. Entry into Force: The treaty enters into force once the required number of ratifications is achieved.
The specific conditions for entry into force are usually outlined in the treaty itself.
Interpretation and Application
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties provides guidelines for the interpretation and application of
treaties. Key principles include:
1. Good Faith: Treaties must be interpreted and performed in good faith (pacta sunt servanda).
2. Ordinary Meaning: The terms of the treaty should be interpreted according to their ordinary meaning
in the context of the treaty and in light of its object and purpose.
3. Supplementary Means: If the meaning of the treaty is ambiguous, supplementary means of
interpretation, such as the preparatory work (travaux préparatoires) and the circumstances of its
conclusion, may be used.
Examples of Significant Treaties
1. United Nations Charter (1945): Established the United Nations and set out its purposes, principles,
and structure. It is a foundational treaty for international peace and security.
2. Geneva Conventions (1949): Comprise four treaties that set the standards for international
humanitarian law, particularly in times of armed conflict.
3. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) (1968): Aims to prevent the spread
of nuclear weapons and promote peaceful uses of nuclear energy.
4. Paris Agreement (2015): An international treaty on climate change, aiming to limit global warming
to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Conclusion
Treaties are a fundamental source of public international law, providing a structured and legally binding
framework for international relations. They play a crucial role in maintaining global order, promoting cooperation,
and addressing international issues. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties outlines the rules and
principles governing the creation, interpretation, and application of treaties, ensuring their effective
implementation and adherence by states.
General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations
General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations
General principles of law recognized by civilized nations are fundamental rules that are universally acknowledged
and applied by the majority of legal systems around the world. These principles serve as a source of public
international law, filling gaps where treaties and customary international law may not provide clear guidance.
They ensure that international legal proceedings are fair, just, and consistent.
Sources of Public International Law
According to Article 38(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the sources of public
international law include:
1. International conventions (treaties)
2. International custom
3. General principles of law recognized by civilized nations
4. Judicial decisions and teachings of the most highly qualified publicists
Examples of General Principles
1. Principle of Good Faith: This principle mandates that parties to a treaty or agreement must act
honestly and fairly towards each other, fulfilling their obligations sincerely.
2. Principle of Equity: Equity involves fairness and justice in the application of law, ensuring that legal
outcomes are just and reasonable.
3. Principle of Res Judicata: This principle prevents the same dispute from being litigated more than
once, ensuring finality in legal proceedings.
4. Principle of Natural Justice: This includes the right to a fair hearing and the rule against bias,
ensuring that legal processes are conducted impartially.
5. Principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda: This principle holds that agreements and treaties are binding upon
the parties and must be executed in good faith.
Application in International Law
General principles of law are applied by international courts and tribunals to resolve disputes. They are
particularly useful when there is no specific treaty or customary rule applicable to a case. For instance, the ICJ
often relies on these principles to interpret and apply international law in a manner consistent with the
fundamental values shared by the international community.
Indian Context
In the Indian legal system, these general principles are also recognized and applied. For example, the principle
of natural justice is enshrined in Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law
and equal protection of the laws. Similarly, the principle of good faith is reflected in various Indian statutes, such
as the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Landmark Case Laws
1. Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v. Albania): The ICJ applied the principle of good faith and
the duty of states to not knowingly allow their territory to be used for acts contrary to the rights of other
states.
2. Barcelona Traction Case (Belgium v. Spain): The ICJ recognized the principle of equity in
determining the rights of shareholders in a company.
3. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala: The Supreme Court of India applied the principle of natural
justice in its landmark judgment on the basic structure doctrine.
Page 8 of 52
Conclusion
General principles of law recognized by civilized nations play a crucial role in the development and application of
international law. They provide a foundation for legal reasoning and ensure that international legal processes are
grounded in universally accepted standards of justice and fairness. Understanding these principles is essential
for anyone studying or practicing international law, as they bridge the gaps where specific legal rules may be
absent.
Judicial Decisions and Juristic Writings
Judicial Decisions and Juristic Writings in Public International Law
Judicial decisions and juristic writings are supplementary sources of public international law. They help interpret
and apply primary sources such as treaties, customs, and general principles of law. These sources provide clarity,
consistency, and development in international legal norms.
Judicial Decisions
Judicial decisions refer to the rulings and judgments made by international courts and tribunals. These decisions
are not binding precedents in the same way as in common law systems, but they are highly persuasive and
influential.
Key International Courts and Tribunals
1. International Court of Justice (ICJ): The principal judicial organ of the United Nations, which settles
disputes between states and gives advisory opinions on international legal questions.
2. International Criminal Court (ICC): A court established to prosecute individuals for international
crimes such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
3. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS): A tribunal that adjudicates disputes arising
out of the interpretation and application of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS).
4. World Trade Organization (WTO) Dispute Settlement Body: Resolves trade disputes between
member states.
Examples of Influential Judicial Decisions
1. Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v. Albania): The ICJ established the principle that states
must not knowingly allow their territory to be used for acts contrary to the rights of other states.
2. Nicaragua v. United States: The ICJ ruled on the use of force and the principle of non-intervention,
reinforcing the prohibition of the use of force in international relations.
3. South West Africa Cases: The ICJ's decisions in these cases contributed to the development of the
principle of self-determination.
Juristic Writings
Juristic writings, also known as the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists, refer to scholarly works by
eminent legal scholars and experts in international law. These writings provide interpretations, analyses, and
critiques of international legal principles and practices.
Role and Influence
1. Interpretation of Law: Juristic writings help interpret ambiguous or unclear provisions in treaties and
customary international law.
2. Development of Law: Scholars propose new legal theories and principles that can influence the
evolution of international law.
3. Guidance for Courts: Courts and tribunals often refer to juristic writings to support their reasoning
and decisions.
Notable Jurists and Their Contributions
1. Hugo Grotius: Often considered the father of international law, his work "De Jure Belli ac Pacis" laid
the foundation for modern international legal principles.
2. Emer de Vattel: His book "The Law of Nations" influenced the development of the concept of state
sovereignty and the law of nations.
3. Hans Kelsen: Known for his "Pure Theory of Law," which has had a significant impact on the
understanding of international legal systems.
4. Hersch Lauterpacht: His writings on the role of international law in the protection of human rights
have been highly influential.
Application in Indian Context
In India, judicial decisions and juristic writings are also recognized as important sources of law. The Indian
judiciary often refers to international judicial decisions and scholarly writings to interpret and apply international
law principles.
Landmark Indian Cases
1. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: The Supreme Court of India referred to international conventions and
norms to frame guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at the workplace.
2. Gramophone Company of India Ltd. v. Birendra Bahadur Pandey: The Supreme Court cited
international conventions to interpret the Copyright Act, 1957.
Conclusion
Judicial decisions and juristic writings play a crucial role in the development and application of public international
law. They provide authoritative interpretations, fill gaps in the law, and contribute to the evolution of legal
principles. Understanding these sources is essential for anyone engaged in the study or practice of international
law, as they offer valuable insights and guidance on complex legal issues.
Equity and Resolutions of the General Assembly
Equity and Resolutions of the General Assembly in Public International Law
Equity in International Law
Page 9 of 52
Equity in international law refers to the application of principles of fairness, justice, and reasonableness to achieve
just outcomes in legal disputes. It is not a source of law per se but a method of interpreting and applying existing
legal rules to ensure fair results.
Role of Equity
1. Supplementing Legal Rules: Equity is used to fill gaps where strict application of legal rules may lead
to unjust outcomes.
2. Balancing Interests: It helps balance conflicting interests and ensures that legal decisions are fair
and just.
3. Guiding Judicial Discretion: Courts and tribunals use equity to guide their discretion in cases where
the law is ambiguous or silent.
Application in International Law
1. Maritime Delimitation: Equity plays a significant role in maritime boundary disputes, where courts
aim to achieve an equitable solution that considers the interests of all parties involved.
2. Environmental Law: Equity is used to address issues of environmental justice, ensuring that the
benefits and burdens of environmental protection are fairly distributed.
Notable Cases
1. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Germany v. Denmark; Germany v. Netherlands): The ICJ
emphasized the principle of equity in maritime delimitation, stating that the delimitation must be
effected by an equitable solution.
2. Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia): The ICJ applied equitable principles to resolve
a dispute over a dam project, balancing environmental protection with economic development.
Resolutions of the General Assembly
Resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) are formal expressions of the opinion or will of the
member states. While they are not legally binding, they carry significant moral and political weight and can
influence the development of international law.
Types of Resolutions
1. Declarations: These are statements of principles or standards, such as the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights (UDHR).
2. Recommendations: These suggest actions or policies for member states to adopt.
3. Decisions: These pertain to procedural or administrative matters within the UN.
Role in International Law
1. Normative Influence: General Assembly resolutions can contribute to the formation of customary
international law by reflecting the collective will of the international community.
2. Guidance for States: They provide guidance on the interpretation and application of international legal
principles.
3. Agenda Setting: Resolutions can set the agenda for international discussions and negotiations on key
issues.
Notable Resolutions
1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948): Although not legally binding, the UDHR has
significantly influenced international human rights law and has been incorporated into various national
constitutions and legal systems.
2. Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples (1960): This
resolution played a crucial role in the decolonization process and the recognition of the right to self-
determination.
3. Resolution 2625 (XXV) - Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly
Relations and Cooperation among States (1970): This resolution elaborates on key principles of
international law, such as the prohibition of the use of force and the principle of sovereign equality.
Application in Indian Context
In India, both equity and General Assembly resolutions are recognized and applied in various legal contexts.
Indian courts often refer to these sources to interpret and apply international law principles.
Landmark Indian Cases
1. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: The Supreme Court of India referred to international conventions and
General Assembly resolutions to frame guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at the workplace.
2. Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India: The Supreme Court applied principles of equity to
balance environmental protection with developmental needs.
Conclusion
Equity and resolutions of the General Assembly are essential components of public international law. Equity
ensures that legal outcomes are fair and just, while General Assembly resolutions reflect the collective will of the
international community and influence the development of international legal norms. Understanding these
sources is crucial for anyone engaged in the study or practice of international law, as they provide valuable
insights and guidance on complex legal issues.
Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
Monistic Theory
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law
The relationship between international law and municipal (domestic) law concerns how international legal norms
are incorporated and applied within a country's legal system. This relationship is crucial for ensuring that states
comply with their international obligations while maintaining their sovereignty.
Theories Explaining the Relationship
Page 10 of 52
There are two primary theories that explain the relationship between international law and municipal law: Monism
and Dualism.
Monistic Theory
Definition
Monistic theory posits that international law and municipal law form a single, unified legal system. According to
this theory, international law is automatically incorporated into the domestic legal system without the need for
specific legislative action. In a monistic system, international law can directly create rights and obligations for
individuals within the state.
Key Features
1. Unified Legal System: International and municipal laws are seen as part of a single legal framework.
2. Direct Applicability: International law is directly applicable within the domestic legal system without
the need for transformation or incorporation.
3. Supremacy of International Law: In cases of conflict between international and municipal law,
international law prevails.
Application in Practice
In monistic states, international treaties and customary international law are automatically part of the domestic
legal system. Courts in these states can directly apply international law to resolve disputes.
Examples of Monistic States
1. Netherlands: The Dutch Constitution explicitly states that international treaties and decisions of
international organizations have direct effect and take precedence over conflicting national laws.
2. France: The French Constitution provides that duly ratified international treaties have authority superior
to that of domestic laws.
Indian Context
India follows a dualist approach, meaning that international law does not automatically become part of the
domestic legal system. However, elements of monism can be seen in certain judicial decisions where international
law principles are directly applied.
Notable Indian Cases
1. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: The Supreme Court of India referred to international conventions,
such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), to
frame guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at the workplace.
2. Gramophone Company of India Ltd. v. Birendra Bahadur Pandey: The Supreme Court cited
international conventions to interpret the Copyright Act, 1957, demonstrating an instance where
international law influenced domestic law.
Criticisms of Monistic Theory
1. Sovereignty Concerns: Critics argue that monism undermines state sovereignty by allowing
international law to override domestic law without legislative approval.
2. Democratic Deficit: There is a concern that monism may lead to the imposition of international norms
that have not been democratically approved by the state's legislative body.
Conclusion
The relationship between international law and municipal law is a complex and evolving area of legal theory and
practice. Monistic theory advocates for a unified legal system where international law is directly applicable within
the domestic legal framework, while dualistic theory maintains a clear separation between the two.
Understanding these theories is essential for comprehending how states interact with international legal norms
and fulfill their international obligations.
Dualistic Theory
Dualistic Theory
Definition
Dualistic theory posits that international law and municipal (domestic) law are two distinct and separate legal
systems. According to this theory, international law does not automatically become part of the domestic legal
system. Instead, it must be explicitly transformed into domestic law through legislative action before it can have
any effect within the state.
Key Features
1. Separate Legal Systems: International law and municipal law operate independently of each other.
They are seen as two separate spheres of law.
2. Need for Transformation: International treaties and customary international law require specific
legislative action to be incorporated into the domestic legal system. This process is often referred to as
"transformation" or "incorporation."
3. Supremacy of Domestic Law: In cases of conflict between international and domestic law, domestic
law prevails unless international law has been duly incorporated into the domestic legal system.
Application in Practice
In dualistic states, international treaties and customary international law do not automatically become part of
the domestic legal system. They must be incorporated through legislation. This means that even if a state is a
party to an international treaty, the provisions of that treaty will not have legal effect within the state until the
national legislature enacts a corresponding law.
Examples of Dualistic States
1. United Kingdom: The UK follows a dualist approach, where international treaties require an Act of
Parliament to be incorporated into domestic law. For example, the European Convention on Human
Rights was incorporated into UK law through the Human Rights Act 1998.
2. India: India also follows a dualist approach. International treaties and conventions must be transformed
into domestic law through legislative action. For instance, the Convention on the Rights of the Child was
Page 11 of 52
ratified by India, but its provisions were implemented through the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection
of Children) Act, 2000.
Indian Context
In India, the dualist approach is evident in the way international treaties and conventions are handled. The Indian
Constitution does not automatically incorporate international law into the domestic legal system. Instead, the
Parliament must pass legislation to give effect to international treaties and conventions.
1. Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin: The Supreme Court of India held that international
covenants and treaties do not automatically become part of the domestic law unless they are
incorporated by legislation.
2. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan: Although the Supreme Court referred to international conventions,
such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), to
frame guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at the workplace, it did so in the absence of domestic
legislation, highlighting the need for legislative action to incorporate international norms.
Criticisms of Dualistic Theory
1. Delay in Implementation: The requirement for legislative action can delay the implementation of
international obligations, potentially leading to non-compliance with international commitments.
2. Fragmentation of Legal Systems: The separation of international and domestic legal systems can
lead to inconsistencies and fragmentation, making it difficult to achieve a coherent legal framework.
3. Limited Influence of International Law: In a dualist system, international law may have limited
influence on domestic legal practices and policies unless it is explicitly incorporated.
Comparison with Monistic Theory
 Monistic Theory: International law and municipal law form a single, unified legal system. International
law is directly applicable within the domestic legal system without the need for transformation.
 Dualistic Theory: International law and municipal law are separate legal systems. International law
must be transformed into domestic law through legislative action to have any effect within the state.
Conclusion
The dualistic theory emphasizes the separation between international and municipal law, requiring explicit
legislative action to incorporate international legal norms into the domestic legal system. This approach ensures
that international obligations are subject to domestic legislative scrutiny and approval, maintaining the
sovereignty of the state. Understanding the dualistic theory is essential for comprehending how states interact
with international legal norms and fulfill their international obligations within their domestic legal frameworks.
Subjects of International Law
States
In international law, "subjects" refer to entities that possess rights and obligations under international law and
have the capacity to engage in international relations. States are the primary subjects of international law,
meaning they are the main actors with full legal personality in the international legal system.
Characteristics of States as Subjects of International Law
According to the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933), a state must possess the
following characteristics to be considered a subject of international law:
1. Permanent Population: A state must have a stable and permanent population.
2. Defined Territory: A state must have a clearly defined geographical area.
3. Government: A state must have a functioning government that exercises effective control over its
territory and population.
4. Capacity to Enter into Relations with Other States: A state must have the ability to engage in
diplomatic and international relations with other states.
Rights and Obligations of States
As subjects of international law, states have various rights and obligations, including:
1. Sovereignty: States have the right to exercise supreme authority within their territory and conduct
their affairs without external interference.
2. Equality: All states are considered equal under international law, regardless of their size, power, or
wealth.
3. Non-Intervention: States have the obligation to refrain from intervening in the internal affairs of other
states.
4. Respect for International Law: States must comply with international treaties, customary
international law, and general principles of law.
5. Peaceful Settlement of Disputes: States are obligated to resolve their disputes through peaceful
means, such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or judicial settlement.
Recognition of States
Recognition is the process by which existing states acknowledge the existence of a new state and accept it as a
member of the international community. Recognition can be:
1. De Jure Recognition: Formal and legal acknowledgment of a state's existence.
2. De Facto Recognition: Practical acknowledgment of a state's existence without formal legal
recognition.
Examples of Statehood and Recognition
1. South Sudan: South Sudan became an independent state in 2011 and was subsequently recognized
by the international community.
2. Palestine: Palestine's statehood is recognized by some countries and international organizations, but
not universally accepted.
Page 12 of 52
Indian Context
India, as a sovereign state, is a primary subject of international law. It engages in international relations, enters
into treaties, and participates in international organizations. India's rights and obligations under international law
are governed by its status as a state.
1. Berubari Union Case: The Supreme Court of India dealt with issues of territorial sovereignty and the
transfer of territory between India and Pakistan.
2. In Re: Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves: The Supreme Court examined the constitutional
requirements for ceding Indian territory to another state.
Conclusion
States are the primary subjects of international law, possessing full legal personality and the capacity to engage
in international relations. They have specific rights and obligations under international law, including sovereignty,
equality, non-intervention, and the peaceful settlement of disputes. Understanding the role of states as subjects
of international law is essential for comprehending the functioning of the international legal system and the
interactions between different legal entities on the global stage
International Organizations
States and International Organizations in Public International Law
Definition and Essential Elements of a State
A state is the primary subject of international law. According to the Montevideo Convention of 1933, a state must
possess the following qualifications:
1. Permanent Population: A stable community of people.
2. Defined Territory: Clearly demarcated geographical boundaries.
3. Government: An established political authority.
4. Capacity to Enter into Relations with Other States: The ability to engage in diplomatic and
international relations.
Types of States
1. Sovereign States: Fully independent and recognized entities with complete control over their internal
and external affairs.
2. Semi-Sovereign States: States that have limited sovereignty, often due to treaties or agreements
with more powerful states.
3. Protectorates: Regions that are controlled and protected by another state.
4. Vassal States: States that are under the suzerainty of another state, with limited independence.
5. Trust Territories: Regions administered by other states under the supervision of international
organizations like the United Nations.
6. Neutralized States: States whose independence and neutrality are guaranteed by international
treaties.
7. Holy See (Vatican City): A unique entity that serves as the spiritual and administrative center of the
Roman Catholic Church.
Recognition is the formal acknowledgment by existing states that a new entity meets the criteria of statehood
and is eligible to participate in international relations. There are two main theories of recognition:
1. Constitutive Theory: A state becomes a subject of international law only through recognition by other
states.
2. Declaratory Theory: A state exists as a subject of international law once it meets the criteria of
statehood, regardless of recognition by other states.
International Organizations
International organizations are entities established by treaties between sovereign states to achieve common
goals. They play a crucial role in maintaining international peace, security, and cooperation.
Key International Organizations
1. United Nations (UN): Established in 1945, the UN aims to promote peace, security, and cooperation
among states. Its principal organs include:
o General Assembly: A deliberative body where all member states are represented.
o Security Council: Responsible for maintaining international peace and security, with five
permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and
ten non-permanent members.
o International Court of Justice (ICJ): The principal judicial organ that settles legal disputes
between states.
o Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC): Coordinates economic, social, and related work of
the UN and its specialized agencies.
o Secretariat: The administrative organ headed by the Secretary-General.
o Trusteeship Council: Oversees the administration of trust territories (currently inactive).
2. World Trade Organization (WTO): Established in 1995, the WTO deals with global trade rules and
aims to ensure smooth and fair trade between nations.
3. International Labour Organization (ILO): Founded in 1919, the ILO promotes social justice and
internationally recognized human and labor rights.
Functions and Importance of International Organizations
 Peacekeeping and Security: Organizations like the UN play a vital role in conflict resolution and
peacekeeping.
 Economic Development: Entities like the WTO and ILO work towards economic stability and fair labor
practices.
Page 13 of 52
 Human Rights: International organizations advocate for and protect human rights globally.
 Environmental Protection: Organizations like the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
focus on global environmental issues.
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law
The relationship between international law and municipal (domestic) law can be understood through various
theories:
1. Monism: International and municipal laws form a single legal system, with international law prevailing
over domestic law.
2. Dualism: International and municipal laws are separate systems, and international law must be
explicitly adopted into domestic law to have effect.
3. Transformation Theory: International law needs to be transformed into domestic law through
legislative action.
4. Specific Adoption Theory: International law is directly applicable in domestic law only if specifically
adopted by the state.
Conclusion
Understanding the roles and functions of states and international organizations is crucial for comprehending the
dynamics of international law. States are the primary actors, but international organizations facilitate
cooperation, peace, and development on a global scale. The relationship between international and municipal
law varies, but both are essential for maintaining order and justice in the international community.
Individuals
Individuals in Public International Law
Historical Context
Historically, international law primarily focused on states as the main subjects, treating individuals as objects
without direct rights or obligations. This perspective began to shift significantly after World War II, particularly
with the establishment of the United Nations and the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in
1948.
Evolution of Individual Rights
1. Pre-1945: Individuals were largely seen as objects of international law. States were the primary actors,
and individuals had no direct rights or obligations under international law.
2. Post-1945: The aftermath of World War II and the Nuremberg Trials marked a significant shift. The
international community began to recognize the need for individual accountability and protection under
international law.
Legal Status of Individuals
1. Subjects of International Law: Modern international law increasingly recognizes individuals as
subjects with rights and obligations. This shift is evident in various international treaties and conventions
that directly address individual rights.
2. International Human Rights Law: Instruments like the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
explicitly grant rights to individuals and impose obligations on states to protect these rights.
Rights of Individuals
1. Human Rights: Individuals have a wide range of rights under international human rights law, including
the right to life, freedom from torture, freedom of expression, and the right to a fair trial.
2. Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: These include the right to work, education, health, and an
adequate standard of living.
3. Protection in Armed Conflicts: International humanitarian law, particularly the Geneva Conventions,
provides protections for individuals during armed conflicts, including prisoners of war and civilians.
Duties of Individuals
1. Respect for Sovereignty: Individuals must respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of states.
This includes refraining from acts of terrorism and other activities that violate state sovereignty.
2. Compliance with International Law: Individuals are also subject to international criminal law, which
holds them accountable for crimes such as genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
Mechanisms for Enforcement
1. International Courts and Tribunals: Individuals can bring claims before international bodies like the
European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights if their rights are
violated.
2. International Criminal Court (ICC): The ICC prosecutes individuals for serious international crimes,
ensuring accountability and justice.
Conclusion
The role of individuals in international law has evolved significantly. From being mere objects, individuals are
now recognized as subjects with rights and obligations. This transformation underscores the growing importance
of human rights and individual accountability in the international legal framework. The recognition of individual
rights and duties not only enhances the protection of human dignity but also contributes to the development of
a more just and equitable international order.
Module 2: Statehood and Recognition

States as Subjects of International Law
Definition and Characteristics of Statehood\
Definition and Characteristics of Statehood in International Law
Definition of a State
Page 14 of 52
A state is a primary subject of international law, recognized as an entity with a defined territory, a permanent
population, a government, and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. This definition is widely
accepted and is encapsulated in the Montevideo Convention of 1933.
Essential Elements of Statehood
According to the Montevideo Convention and various legal scholars, a state must possess the following
characteristics:
1. Permanent Population: A stable community of people who reside within the state's territory. This
population does not need to be large but must be permanent.
2. Defined Territory: Clearly demarcated geographical boundaries within which the state exercises its
authority. The size of the territory is not as important as the fact that it is defined and recognized.
3. Government: An established political authority that exercises control over the territory and population.
The government must be capable of maintaining order and providing public services.
4. Capacity to Enter into Relations with Other States: The ability to engage in diplomatic and
international relations. This implies recognition by other states and the ability to enter into treaties and
agreements.
Additional Characteristics
1. Sovereignty: The state must have supreme authority within its territory and independence from
external control. Sovereignty implies that the state can make its own laws and policies without
interference from other states.
2. Recognition: While not a formal requirement for statehood, recognition by other states and
international organizations is crucial for a state to fully participate in the international community.
Recognition can be de facto (acknowledgment of control) or de jure (formal acknowledgment of
statehood).
Types of States
1. Sovereign States: Fully independent and recognized entities with complete control over their internal
and external affairs.
2. Semi-Sovereign States: States that have limited sovereignty, often due to treaties or agreements
with more powerful states.
3. Protectorates: Regions that are controlled and protected by another state.
4. Vassal States: States that are under the suzerainty of another state, with limited independence.
5. Trust Territories: Regions administered by other states under the supervision of international
organizations like the United Nations.
6. Neutralized States: States whose independence and neutrality are guaranteed by international
treaties.
7. Holy See (Vatican City): A unique entity that serves as the spiritual and administrative center of the
Roman Catholic Church.
Recognition is the formal acknowledgment by existing states that a new entity meets the criteria of statehood
and is eligible to participate in international relations. There are two main theories of recognition:
1. Constitutive Theory: A state becomes a subject of international law only through recognition by other
states.
2. Declaratory Theory: A state exists as a subject of international law once it meets the criteria of
statehood, regardless of recognition by other states.
Legal Definitions and Perspectives
 Oppenheim: Defined international law as a body of customary and treaty rules considered legally
binding by civilized states in their interactions with each other. He emphasized that states are the
primary subjects of international law.
 J.G. Starke: Expanded the definition to include not only states but also international organizations,
individuals, and non-state entities. He highlighted that international law governs the relations between
these entities and includes rules related to the functioning of international institutions.
Conclusion
Understanding the definition and characteristics of statehood is fundamental to comprehending the structure and
function of international law. A state must have a permanent population, a defined territory, a government, and
the capacity to engage in international relations. Recognition, while not a formal requirement, plays a crucial role
in a state's ability to participate fully in the international community. The evolution of these concepts reflects the
dynamic nature of international law and its adaptation to changing global realities.
Recognition of States and Governments
Recognition of States and Governments in International Law
Definition and Significance of Recognition
Recognition in international law is the formal acknowledgment by existing states that a new entity meets the
criteria of statehood and is eligible to participate in international relations. Recognition is crucial because it allows
the new state to engage in diplomatic relations, enter into treaties, and become a member of international
organizations.
 Professor G. Schwarzenberger: Recognition is a process through which existing states acknowledge
the sovereignty and independence of a new state, thereby allowing it to join the international
community.
 Prof. L. Oppenheim: Recognition is the declaration by existing states that a new state fulfills the
conditions of statehood as required by international law.
 Fenwick: Through recognition, the international community formally acknowledges that a new state
has acquired international personality.
Page 15 of 52
Theories of Recognition
1. Constitutive Theory:
o This theory posits that recognition by other states is essential for a new state to acquire
international personality and rights under international law.
o Hegel, Anzilloti, Oppenheim: A state becomes an international person through recognition
only and exclusively.
Criticism: This theory faces criticism because it suggests that a state without recognition has no rights
or duties under international law, which is impractical. For example, China and Bangladesh had all
attributes of statehood but were not recognized by some states for a period.
2. Declaratory Theory: According to this theory, a state exists as a subject of international law once it
meets the criteria of statehood, regardless of recognition by other states.
 Hall, Wagner, Brierly: Recognition is merely a formal acknowledgment of an existing fact that a state
possesses the essential attributes of statehood.
 Soviet View: Birth of a state is an act of internal law rather than international law.
Criticism: While recognition is declaratory of an existing fact, it also has constitutive effects, such as
enabling the recognized state to engage in diplomatic relations and join international organizations.
Types of Recognition
1. De Facto Recognition:
o This is provisional recognition given when a state possesses the essential elements of statehood
but lacks stability or permanence.
o Prof. G. Schwarzenberger: De facto recognition is a step towards de jure recognition and
indicates that the recognizing state wants to establish relations without full diplomatic ties.
o Judge Lauterpacht: De facto recognition shows a desire to establish relations without full
diplomatic recognition.
2. De Jure Recognition:
o This is full and formal recognition given when a state meets all the essential requirements of
statehood and is capable of being a member of the international community.
o Prof. H.A. Smith: De jure recognition requires stability, permanence, and statehood.
o Prof. G. Schwarzenberger: De jure recognition implies full and normal diplomatic relations.
o Kelsen: De jure recognition is final, whereas de facto recognition is provisional and may be
withdrawn
Recognition of Governments
Recognition of governments involves acknowledging the authority of a new government that has come to power,
often through non-constitutional means such as a coup or revolution. The criteria for recognizing a new
government include:
1. Effective Control: The new government must have effective control over the state's territory and
population.
2. Stability and Permanence: The government should demonstrate stability and the ability to maintain
order.
3. Willingness to Fulfill International Obligations: The new government must show a willingness to
adhere to international treaties and obligations.
Doctrines of Recognition
1. Estrada Doctrine: Propounded by Mr. Estrada, the Foreign Minister of Mexico, this doctrine states that
the establishment of diplomatic relations should be based on the facts and circumstances of each case,
without formal recognition of governments.
Criticism: This doctrine disregards international law rules and encourages individual appraisal in
recognition matters.
2. Stimson Doctrine: Propounded by Mr. Stimson, Secretary of State of the United States, this doctrine
states that recognition should not be granted to states created in violation of international treaties, such
as the Pact of Paris, 1928.
Application: This doctrine was applied when Japan attacked Manchuria in 1931, and the League
Assembly passed a resolution against recognizing states violating the Pact of Paris.
State Territory
Constitution, Acquisition, and Loss of Territory
Constitution of State Territory
State territory refers to the geographical area under the jurisdiction and sovereignty of a state. It includes land,
internal waters, territorial sea, and the airspace above these areas. The concept of state territory is fundamental
to the notion of statehood in international law, as a state cannot exist without a defined territory.
 Definition: According to Oppenheim, state territory is "a portion of the globe which is subjected to the
sovereignty of a state".
 Components: State territory includes:
o Land Territory: The physical landmass.
o Internal Waters: Waters on the landward side of the baseline, including rivers, lakes, and
canals.
o Territorial Sea: A belt of coastal waters extending up to 12 nautical miles from the baseline.
o Airspace: The space above the land and territorial waters.
o Subsoil: The ground beneath the land and waters.
Acquisition of State Territory
States can acquire territory through various methods recognized under international law. These methods include:
1. Occupation:
Page 16 of 52
o Definition: The acquisition of terra nullius (territory not under the sovereignty of any state)
by a state through effective control and administration.
o Requirements: Intention to act as sovereign and effective occupation (actual control and
administration).
Case Example: The Island of Palmas case, where the arbitrator ruled that effective occupation and
administration are necessary for a valid claim.
2. Prescription:
o Definition: Acquisition of territory through continuous and peaceful exercise of sovereignty
over a long period.
o Requirements: Long duration, peaceful and uninterrupted possession, and public exercise of
sovereignty.
Case Example: The Island of Palmas case also highlighted the importance of continuous and
effective control.
3. Accretion:
o Definition: The gradual and natural addition of land to a state's territory through natural
processes like sediment deposition.
o Characteristics: No formal act is required; the new land automatically becomes part of the
state's territory.
4. Cession:
o Definition: Transfer of territory from one state to another through a treaty or agreement.
o Types: Voluntary (peaceful negotiations) or involuntary (result of war or compulsion).
Case Example: The cession of Hong Kong from China to the United Kingdom and its subsequent
retrocession.
5. Conquest and Annexation:
o Definition: Acquisition of territory through the use of force and subsequent formal annexation.
o Modern View: Generally considered illegal under contemporary international law, particularly
after the adoption of the UN Charter
6. Adjudication:
o Definition: Acquisition of territory through a decision by an international court or tribunal.
o Example: The resolution of territorial disputes by the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Loss of State Territory
States can lose territory through various means, including:
1. Cession:
o Definition: Voluntary transfer of territory to another state through a treaty or agreement.
o Example: The cession of Alaska from Russia to the United States in 1867.
2. Conquest and Annexation:
o Definition: Loss of territory through military defeat and subsequent annexation by the
victorious state.
o Modern View: Generally considered illegal under contemporary international law.
3. Decolonization:
o Definition: The process by which colonies gain independence and become sovereign states.
o Example: The independence of India from British rule in 1947.
4. Dismemberment:
o Definition: The breakup of a state into two or more independent states.
o Example: The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, resulting in the creation of
multiple independent states.
5. Prescription:
o Definition: Loss of territory due to the continuous and peaceful exercise of sovereignty by
another state over a long period.
o Example: The gradual loss of control over a territory due to effective administration by another
state.
6. Adjudication:
o Definition: Loss of territory through a decision by an international court or tribunal.
o Example: The resolution of territorial disputes by the ICJ, resulting in the transfer of territory.
Conclusion
The constitution, acquisition, and loss of state territory are fundamental aspects of statehood in international
law. States acquire territory through methods like occupation, prescription, accretion, cession, conquest, and
adjudication. Conversely, they can lose territory through cession, conquest, decolonization, dismemberment,
prescription, and adjudication. These processes are governed by principles of international law to ensure stability
and order in international relations.
State Jurisdiction
o Territorial Jurisdiction
o Personal Jurisdiction
o Protective Jurisdiction
o Universal Jurisdiction
Territorial Jurisdiction
Definition and Scope:Territorial jurisdiction refers to the power of a state to regulate and enforce laws within
its geographical boundaries. This includes land, internal waters, territorial sea, and the airspace above these
Page 17 of 52
areas. The principle is rooted in the sovereignty of the state, allowing it to exercise authority over all persons,
property, and events within its territory. Components:
1. Land Territory: The physical landmass within the state's borders.
2. Internal Waters: Waters on the landward side of the baseline, including rivers, lakes, and canals.
3. Territorial Sea: A belt of coastal waters extending up to 12 nautical miles from the baseline.
4. Airspace: The space above the land and territorial waters.
5. Subsoil: The ground beneath the land and waters.
Legal Basis:
 Island of Palmas Case: Emphasized that sovereignty over territory involves the right to exercise
authority to the exclusion of other states.
 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982): Codifies the extent of territorial waters and the rights
of coastal states.
Personal Jurisdiction
Definition and Scope: Personal jurisdiction refers to the authority of a state to regulate the conduct of its
nationals, regardless of where they are located. This principle allows a state to apply its laws to its citizens even
when they are abroad. Components:
1. Nationality Principle: States can exercise jurisdiction over their nationals for actions committed
outside their territory.
2. Domicile: Jurisdiction can also be based on the domicile of the individual, which is their permanent
home.
Legal Basis:
 Nationality Principle: Recognized in international law as a basis for jurisdiction, allowing states to
prosecute their nationals for crimes committed abroad.
Protective Jurisdiction
Definition and Scope: Protective jurisdiction allows a state to exercise authority over actions that threaten its
security, even if these actions occur outside its territory. This principle is invoked to protect the state's vital
interests. Components:
1. National Security: Actions that threaten the state's security, such as espionage or terrorism.
2. Economic Interests: Activities that could harm the state's economic stability.
Legal Basis:
 Protective Principle: Recognized in international law, allowing states to take action against threats to
their security and vital interests.
Universal Jurisdiction
Definition and Scope: Universal jurisdiction allows a state to prosecute individuals for certain serious crimes
regardless of where the crime was committed and regardless of the nationality of the perpetrators or the victims.
This principle is based on the notion that some crimes are so heinous that they affect the international community
as a whole.
Components:
1. Crimes Against Humanity: Includes genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
2. Piracy: Historically, piracy has been subject to universal jurisdiction.
3. Torture: Under conventions like the Convention Against Torture, states are required to prosecute or
extradite individuals accused of torture.
Legal Basis:
 International Conventions: Various international treaties, such as the Geneva Conventions and the
Convention Against Torture, mandate universal jurisdiction for specific crimes.
 National Legislation: States often enact laws that allow their courts to exercise universal jurisdiction
over certain crimes.
Conclusion
State jurisdiction in international law encompasses several principles that allow states to exercise authority over
persons, property, and actions. Territorial jurisdiction is based on geographical boundaries, personal jurisdiction
on nationality, protective jurisdiction on national security interests, and universal jurisdiction on the nature of
the crime. These principles ensure that states can maintain order, protect their interests, and uphold international
legal standards.
State Responsibility
Principles of State Responsibility
Principles of State Responsibility in International Law
State responsibility is a fundamental principle in international law that holds states accountable for their actions,
particularly when those actions violate international obligations. The principles of state responsibility are codified
in the International Law Commission's (ILC) Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts
(2001). These principles outline the conditions under which a state is considered responsible for wrongful acts
and the consequences that follow.
Definition and Nature of State Responsibility
State responsibility arises when a state commits an internationally wrongful act, which consists of two main
elements:
1. Attribution: The act must be attributable to the state under international law.
2. Breach: The act must constitute a breach of an international obligation of the state.
Theories of State Responsibility
1. Fault or Subjective Theory:
o This theory posits that a state is responsible only if there is fault or negligence on its part. The
wrongful act must be intentional or due to a lack of due diligence.
Page 18 of 52
o Criticism: This theory is criticized for being too lenient, as it requires proof of intent or
negligence, which can be difficult to establish.
2. Risk or Objective Theory:
o According to this theory, a state is responsible for any breach of an international obligation,
regardless of fault or intent. The focus is on the occurrence of the wrongful act itself.
o Criticism: This theory is seen as too strict, as it holds states liable for acts beyond their control.
3. Eclectic Theories:
o These theories combine elements of both fault and objective theories, suggesting that state
responsibility should consider both the nature of the wrongful act and the circumstances under
which it occurred.
4. Absolute Liability:
o This theory holds states absolutely liable for certain activities that are inherently dangerous,
such as nuclear activities or environmental harm, regardless of fault or intent.
Elements of State Responsibility
1. Act or Omission:
o The wrongful act can be an action or a failure to act (omission) that violates an international
obligation.
2. Attribution to the State:
o The act must be attributable to the state, which includes actions by state organs, officials, or
entities exercising governmental authority.
3. Breach of International Obligation:
o There must be a breach of an international obligation, which can arise from treaties, customary
international law, or general principles of law.
4. No Justification or Excuse:
o The state must not have any valid justification or excuse for the breach, such as consent, self-
defence, or force majeure (unforeseeable circumstances preventing fulfilment of obligations).
Defenses Precluding State Responsibility
1. Consent:
o If the injured state consented to the act, it cannot later claim it as wrongful.
2. Self-Defense:
o Actions taken in self-defence in accordance with the UN Charter are not considered wrongful.
3. Countermeasures:
o Measures taken in response to a prior wrongful act by another state, intended to induce
compliance with international obligations, are permissible.
4. Force Majeure:
o Unforeseeable and irresistible events beyond the state's control that make it materially
impossible to perform the obligation.
5. Distress:
o Actions taken to save lives in situations of extreme peril, where there is no other reasonable
way to save lives.
6. Necessity:
o Actions taken to safeguard an essential interest against a grave and imminent peril, provided
they do not seriously impair an essential interest of the state or states towards which the
obligation exists.
Consequences of State Responsibility
1. Cessation and non-repetition:
o The responsible state must cease the wrongful act and offer assurances that it will not be
repeated.
2. Reparation:
o The responsible state must make full reparation for the injury caused, which can take the form
of:
 Restitution: Restoring the situation to what it was before the wrongful act.
 Compensation: Financial payment for damages that cannot be remedied by
restitution.
 Satisfaction: Acknowledgment of the breach, expression of regret, formal apology,
or other appropriate forms of reparation.
Significance of the Doctrine of Culpa
The doctrine of culpa (fault) plays a significant role in determining state responsibility. It emphasizes the
importance of intent or negligence in attributing responsibility to the state. However, modern international law
tends to favor a more objective approach, focusing on the breach of obligation rather than the subjective intent
of the state.
Conclusion
The principles of state responsibility are essential for maintaining order and justice in international relations.
They ensure that states are held accountable for their actions and provide mechanisms for redress when
international obligations are breached. The balance between fault-based and objective theories reflects the
complexity of international law and the need to adapt to diverse circumstances and evolving norms.
Consequences of Breach of International Obligations
Consequences of Breach of International Obligations
The breach of international obligations by a state triggers the principles of state responsibility, which are codified
in the International Law Commission's (ILC) Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts
Page 19 of 52
(2001). These principles outline the legal consequences that arise when a state commits an internationally
wrongful act.
Key Elements of State Responsibility
1. Attribution: The wrongful act must be attributable to the state under international law.
2. Breach: The act must constitute a breach of an international obligation of the state.
Consequences of Breach
When a state breaches its international obligations, several legal consequences follow:
1. Cessation and Non-Repetition:
o Cessation: The state must cease the wrongful act immediately.
o Non-Repetition: The state must provide assurances and guarantees that the wrongful act will
not be repeated in the future.
2. Reparation:
o The responsible state is obligated to make full reparation for the injury caused by the
internationally wrongful act. Reparation can take several forms:
 Restitution: Restoring the situation to what it was before the wrongful act occurred.
 Compensation: Providing financial payment for damages that cannot be remedied
by restitution.
Forms of Reparation
1. Restitution:
o Restitution aims to re-establish the situation that existed before the wrongful act was
committed. It is the primary form of reparation and is preferred whenever possible.
o Example: If a state unlawfully seizes property, restitution would involve returning the property
to its rightful owner.
2. Compensation:
o Compensation is required when restitution is not possible or does not fully repair the injury. It
covers any financially assessable damage, including loss of profits.
o Example: If a state damages another state's infrastructure, compensation would involve
paying for the repair or replacement of the damaged infrastructure.
3. Satisfaction:
o Satisfaction is appropriate when the injury cannot be made good by restitution or
compensation. It often involves a formal acknowledgment of the breach, an expression of
regret, or a formal apology.
o Example: A state may issue a formal apology for violating another state's sovereignty.
Defenses Precluding Wrongfulness
Certain circumstances can preclude the wrongfulness of an act that would otherwise constitute a breach of
international obligations. These defenses include:
1. Consent:
2. Self-Defense:
3. Countermeasures:
4. Force Majeure:
5. Distress:
way to save lives.
6. Necessity:
obligation exists.
Case Examples
1. Rainbow Warrior Case:
o France was held responsible for the breach of its obligations under the agreement with New
Zealand regarding the Rainbow Warrior incident. France was required to pay compensation and
provide assurances of non-repetition.
2. Corfu Channel Case:
o The International Court of Justice (ICJ) held Albania responsible for the damage caused to
British warships in the Corfu Channel and ordered Albania to pay compensation.
Conclusion
The breach of international obligations by a state leads to significant legal consequences under the principles of
state responsibility. These consequences include the cessation of the wrongful act, assurances of non-repetition,
and various forms of reparation such as restitution, compensation, and satisfaction. The framework provided by
the ILC's Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts ensures that states are held
accountable for their actions and that injured states receive appropriate remedies.
Page 20 of 52
Module 3: Law of the Sea and State Responsibility

Law of the Sea
Maritime Zones: Territorial Sea, Contiguous Zone, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone, High Seas
Maritime Zones under the Law of the Sea
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) defines various maritime zones, each with
specific rights and responsibilities for coastal states. These zones include the Territorial Sea, Contiguous Zone,
Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and High Seas.
1. Territorial Sea
Definition and Scope:
 The Territorial Sea extends up to 12 nautical miles (22.2 kilometres) from the baseline, which is
usually the low-water line along the coast.
 Within this zone, the coastal state exercises full sovereignty, similar to its land territory. This
includes the airspace above and the seabed and subsoil below.
Rights and Responsibilities:
 Sovereignty: The coastal state has the right to regulate navigation, fishing, resource exploitation,
and environmental protection.
 Innocent Passage: Foreign vessels are allowed innocent passage through the territorial sea,
meaning they can traverse it without entering internal waters, stopping, or anchoring unless
necessary. The passage must be continuous and expeditious and not prejudicial to the peace, good
order, or security of the coastal state.
Legal Basis:
 UNCLOS Article 2: Confirms the sovereignty of the coastal state over the territorial sea.
 UNCLOS Article 17: Establishes the right of innocent passage for foreign vessels.
2. Contiguous Zone
 The Contiguous Zone extends up to 24 nautical miles (44.4 kilometres) from the baseline,
overlapping with the Territorial Sea.
 It serves as a buffer zone where the coastal state can exercise limited control to prevent and punish
infringements of its customs, fiscal, immigration, and sanitary laws.
 Enforcement: The coastal state can take necessary measures to prevent violations of its laws and
regulations within its territory or territorial sea.
 Jurisdiction: The coastal state has the right to enforce laws concerning customs, taxation,
immigration, and pollution.
Legal Basis:
 UNCLOS Article 33: Defines the rights of the coastal state in the Contiguous Zone.
3. Continental Shelf
 The Continental Shelf comprises the seabed and subsoil of the submarine areas that extend beyond
the territorial sea to the outer edge of the continental margin, or up to 200 nautical miles (370
kilometers) from the baseline where the continental margin does not extend that far.
 It includes the natural prolongation of the land territory to the outer edge of the continental margin.
 Sovereign Rights: The coastal state has exclusive rights to explore and exploit the natural
resources of the continental shelf, including minerals and sedentary species.
 Jurisdiction: The coastal state has jurisdiction over the establishment and use of artificial islands,
installations, and structures.
Legal Basis:
 UNCLOS Article 76: Defines the Continental Shelf and the rights of the coastal state.
 UNCLOS Article 77: Confirms the sovereign rights of the coastal state over the Continental Shelf.
4. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)
 The EEZ extends up to 200 nautical miles (370 kilometers) from the baseline.
 It includes the water column, seabed, and subsoil.
 Sovereign Rights: The coastal state has exclusive rights to explore, exploit, conserve, and
manage natural resources, both living (e.g., fish) and non-living (e.g., oil, gas).
 Jurisdiction: The coastal state has jurisdiction over the establishment and use of artificial islands,
marine scientific research, and the protection and preservation of the marine environment.
Legal Basis:
 UNCLOS Article 56: Defines the rights, jurisdiction, and duties of the coastal state in the EEZ.
 UNCLOS Article 57: Establishes the breadth of the EEZ.
5. High Seas
 The High Seas are areas of the sea beyond the EEZ, not under the jurisdiction of any state.
 They are open to all states, whether coastal or land-locked.
Page 21 of 52

 Freedom of the High Seas: Includes freedom of navigation, overflight, fishing, laying submarine
cables and pipelines, and conducting scientific research.
 Common Heritage: The resources of the High Seas are considered the common heritage of
mankind, and their exploitation should benefit all humanity.
Legal Basis:
 UNCLOS Article 87: Defines the freedoms of the High Seas.
 UNCLOS Article 89: Prohibits claims of sovereignty over the High Seas.
Conclusion: The Law of the Sea, as codified in UNCLOS, establishes a comprehensive framework for the
governance of maritime zones. Each zone—Territorial Sea, Contiguous Zone, Continental Shelf, EEZ, and High
Seas—has specific rights and responsibilities for coastal states, balancing national interests with the principles of
international cooperation and the common heritage of mankind.
Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries

Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries
The delimitation of maritime boundaries is a crucial aspect of the Law of the Sea, governed primarily by the
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It involves the process of establishing the spatial
limits of various maritime zones between neighbouring states. These zones include the Territorial Sea,
Contiguous Zone, Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), and the Continental Shelf.
Key Principles and Methods of Delimitation
1. Equidistance Principle:
o This principle involves drawing a boundary line equidistant from the nearest points on the
baselines of the two states. It is often used as a starting point for delimitation.
o UNCLOS Article 15: For the Territorial Sea, the equidistance principle is applied unless there
is an agreement to the contrary or if historical title or other special circumstances justify a
different line.
2. Equitable Principles:
o Delimitation should achieve an equitable solution, taking into account relevant circumstances
and the interests of the states involved.
o UNCLOS Articles 74 and 83: These articles emphasize that the delimitation of the EEZ and
the Continental Shelf should be effected by agreement on the basis of international law to
achieve an equitable solution.
3. Relevant Circumstances:
o Factors such as the geography of the coastline, the presence of islands, the length of the
coastlines, and socio-economic considerations can influence the delimitation process.
o Case Example: In the North Sea Continental Shelf cases, the International Court of Justice
(ICJ) emphasized the importance of considering relevant circumstances to achieve an equitable
result.
4. Provisional Arrangements:
o Pending agreement on delimitation, states are encouraged to enter into provisional
arrangements of a practical nature and to make every effort to avoid jeopardizing or hampering
the reaching of a final agreement.
o UNCLOS Article 74(3) and 83(3): These articles provide for provisional arrangements and
emphasize the duty to negotiate in good faith.
Types of Maritime Boundaries
1. Territorial Sea:
o Extends up to 12 nautical miles from the baseline. The boundary is usually determined by the
equidistance principle unless special circumstances justify a different approach.
2. Contiguous Zone:
o Extends up to 24 nautical miles from the baseline. The delimitation is often aligned with the
Territorial Sea boundary but can be adjusted based on specific agreements.
3. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ):
o Extends up to 200 nautical miles from the baseline. The delimitation of the EEZ is based on
equitable principles, considering relevant circumstances to achieve an equitable solution.
4. Continental Shelf:
o Extends up to 200 nautical miles from the baseline or beyond, depending on the natural
prolongation of the land territory. The delimitation follows similar principles as the EEZ,
focusing on achieving an equitable solution.
5. High Seas:
o Beyond the EEZ, the High Seas are not subject to the sovereignty of any state. The delimitation
of maritime boundaries does not apply here as the High Seas are open to all states.
Case Studies and Examples
1. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (1969):
o The ICJ ruled that the delimitation of the Continental Shelf should be based on equitable
principles, taking into account relevant circumstances rather than strictly adhering to the
equidistance principle.
2. Gulf of Maine Case (1984):
Page 22 of 52
o The ICJ applied equitable principles to delimit the maritime boundary between the United
States and Canada, considering factors such as the geography of the coastline and the presence
of islands.
3. Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine, 2009):
o The ICJ used a three-step approach: drawing a provisional equidistance line, considering
relevant circumstances, and adjusting the line to achieve an equitable solution.
Conclusion
The delimitation of maritime boundaries is a complex process that requires careful consideration of legal
principles, geographical factors, and the interests of the states involved. UNCLOS provides a comprehensive
framework for delimitation, emphasizing the need for equitable solutions and encouraging states to negotiate in
good faith. The principles of equidistance and equity, along with the consideration of relevant circumstances,
guide the process to ensure fair and just outcomes.
Concept of "Common Heritage of Mankind"

Concept of "Common Heritage of Mankind"
The concept of "Common Heritage of Mankind" (CHM) is a principle in international law that designates certain
global commons as the collective property of all humanity. This principle aims to ensure that these areas are
preserved for peaceful purposes and benefit all nations, including future generations. The concept is particularly
relevant in the context of the Law of the Sea, outer space, and other global commons.
Key Elements of the Common Heritage of Mankind
1. Non-Appropriation:
o No state or entity can claim sovereignty or ownership over areas designated as the common
heritage of mankind. These areas are not subject to national appropriation by any means,
including occupation or use.
2. Shared Management:
o The management and use of these areas are to be conducted collectively by the international
community. This often involves international organizations or treaties that oversee the
governance and regulation of these areas.
3. Peaceful Use:
o Activities in these areas must be conducted for peaceful purposes. Military activities and the
establishment of military bases are generally prohibited.
4. Benefit to All:
o The resources and benefits derived from these areas should be shared equitably among all
nations, with special consideration for the needs of developing countries.
5. Environmental Protection:
o The preservation and protection of the environment in these areas are paramount. Sustainable
use and conservation measures are essential to ensure that these areas remain viable for
future generations.
Applications of the Common Heritage of Mankind
1. The Deep Seabed:
o The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) designates the deep seabed
beyond national jurisdiction as the common heritage of mankind. The International Seabed
Authority (ISA) is responsible for regulating mineral-related activities in the international
seabed area, ensuring that the benefits are shared equitably.
2. Outer Space:
o The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 establishes outer space, including the Moon and other celestial
bodies, as the common heritage of mankind. It prohibits national appropriation and mandates
that the exploration and use of outer space be carried out for the benefit of all countries.
3. Antarctica:
o While not explicitly termed as the common heritage of mankind, the Antarctic Treaty System
embodies similar principles. It designates Antarctica as a scientific preserve, bans military
activity, and promotes international cooperation in scientific research.
Legal Basis and Development
 UNCLOS (1982): Articles 136-137 of UNCLOS explicitly state that the deep seabed and its resources
are the common heritage of mankind. The convention establishes the ISA to manage these resources.
 Outer Space Treaty (1967): This treaty lays down the principles for the use of outer space,
emphasizing that it should be used for the benefit of all countries and that outer space is not subject to
national appropriation.
 Antarctic Treaty (1959): Although it does not use the term "common heritage of mankind," the
treaty's principles align with the concept by promoting peaceful use and scientific cooperation.
Challenges and Criticisms
1. Implementation and Enforcement:
o Ensuring compliance with the principles of the common heritage of mankind can be challenging.
Effective enforcement mechanisms are often lacking, and there is a need for robust
international cooperation.
2. Equitable Benefit Sharing:
o Achieving equitable sharing of benefits, especially with regard to the resources of the deep
seabed and outer space, remains a contentious issue. Developing countries often argue that
they do not receive a fair share of the benefits.
Page 23 of 52
3. Environmental Concerns:
o Balancing resource exploitation with environmental protection is a significant challenge. There
is a need for stringent environmental regulations to prevent degradation of these global
commons.
Conclusion
The concept of the "Common Heritage of Mankind" is a cornerstone of international law, aiming to ensure that
certain global commons are preserved and used for the benefit of all humanity. It emphasizes non-appropriation,
shared management, peaceful use, equitable benefit sharing, and environmental protection. While the principle
is enshrined in various international treaties and agreements, its implementation poses challenges that require
ongoing international cooperation and commitment.
International Seabed Mining
International Seabed Mining
International seabed mining refers to the exploration and extraction of mineral resources from the seabed beyond
national jurisdiction, known as the "Area." This activity is governed by the United Nations Convention on the Law
of the Sea (UNCLOS) and is managed by the International Seabed Authority (ISA).
Legal Framework
1. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS):
o Part XI: This part of UNCLOS specifically deals with the Area and its resources, declaring them
the "common heritage of mankind." It establishes that activities in the Area shall be carried
out for the benefit of all humanity, with special consideration for the interests and needs of
developing countries.
o Article 136: States that the Area and its resources are the common heritage of mankind.
o Article 137: Prohibits any state from claiming or exercising sovereignty over any part of the
Area or its resources.
2. International Seabed Authority (ISA):
o Establishment: The ISA was established under UNCLOS to organize and control activities in
the Area, particularly with a view to administering the resources.
o Functions: The ISA is responsible for regulating seabed mining activities, ensuring that they
are conducted in an environmentally sustainable manner, and distributing the benefits derived
from these activities equitably.
Types of Resources
The primary resources targeted in international seabed mining include:
1. Polymetallic Nodules: These are potato-sized mineral deposits found on the ocean floor, rich in metals
like manganese, nickel, cobalt, and copper.
2. Polymetallic Sulphides: Found near hydrothermal vents, these deposits contain valuable metals such
as gold, silver, and copper.
3. Cobalt-rich Ferromanganese Crusts: These crusts are found on seamounts and contain high
concentrations of cobalt, nickel, and other metals.
Exploration and Exploitation
1. Exploration:
o Contracts: The ISA grants contracts to states and private entities for the exploration of
mineral resources in the Area. These contracts typically last for 15 years and can be extended.
o Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA): Before exploration activities commence,
contractors must conduct EIAs to assess the potential environmental impacts and propose
mitigation measures.
2. Exploitation:
o Mining Licenses: After successful exploration, entities can apply for exploitation licenses to
begin mining operations. These licenses are subject to strict environmental regulations and
oversight by the ISA.
o Revenue Sharing: A portion of the revenue generated from seabed mining is to be shared
with the international community, particularly benefiting developing countries.
Environmental and Ethical Considerations
1. Environmental Protection:
o Precautionary Principle: The ISA applies the precautionary principle to minimize
environmental harm. This involves taking preventive measures when there is a lack of scientific
certainty about potential environmental impacts.
o Marine Protected Areas: The ISA can designate certain areas as protected to conserve
marine biodiversity and ecosystems.
2. Ethical Issues:
o Equitable Benefit Sharing: Ensuring that the benefits from seabed mining are shared
equitably among all nations, especially developing countries, is a core principle under UNCLOS.
o Sustainable Development: Balancing economic development with environmental
sustainability is crucial. The ISA promotes sustainable practices to ensure that seabed mining
does not compromise the health of marine ecosystems.
Case Studies and Examples
1. Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ):
o The CCZ, located in the Pacific Ocean, is one of the most studied areas for polymetallic nodule
mining. Several exploration contracts have been granted in this region, and it serves as a key
area for developing seabed mining technologies and environmental management practices.
2. Solwara 1 Project:
Page 24 of 52
o This project, located in the Bismarck Sea off Papua New Guinea, was one of the first commercial
seabed mining projects targeting polymetallic sulphides. It faced significant environmental and
financial challenges, highlighting the complexities of seabed mining.
Conclusion
International seabed mining is a complex and evolving field governed by UNCLOS and managed by the ISA. It
offers significant economic opportunities but also poses environmental and ethical challenges. The legal
framework aims to ensure that seabed mining is conducted sustainably and that its benefits are shared equitably
among all nations, particularly developing countries. The balance between resource exploitation and
environmental protection remains a critical focus for the international community.
State Responsibility
International Wrongful Acts
Definition and Nature of Internationally Wrongful Acts
An internationally wrongful act is any action or omission by a state that constitutes a breach of an international
obligation. This concept is central to the principles of state responsibility under international law. The
International Law Commission (ILC) has codified these principles in the Articles on Responsibility of States for
Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001).
Elements of an Internationally Wrongful Act
For an act to be considered internationally wrongful, it must meet two key criteria:
1. Attribution:
o The act must be attributable to the state under international law. This means that the act must
be carried out by state organs, officials, or entities exercising governmental authority.
o Examples: Actions by the military, police, or other state agencies.
2. Breach of an International Obligation:
o The act must constitute a breach of an international obligation of the state. This can arise from
treaties, customary international law, or general principles of law.
o Examples: Violations of human rights treaties, breaches of environmental agreements, or
failure to uphold diplomatic immunities.
Attribution of Conduct to the State
The ILC Articles outline specific scenarios where conduct is attributable to the state:
1. Conduct of State Organs:
o Actions by any state organ, whether legislative, executive, judicial, or other, are attributable
to the state.
o Example: A court's decision that violates international human rights standards.
2. Conduct of Persons or Entities Exercising Elements of Governmental Authority:
o Actions by individuals or entities empowered by the state to exercise elements of governmental
authority are attributable to the state.
o Example: A private security company contracted by the government to perform police
functions.
3. Conduct of Persons Acting on the Instructions of, or Under the Direction or Control of, the
State:
o Actions by individuals acting under the state's instructions or control are attributable to the
state.
o Example: Paramilitary groups acting under the direction of state officials.
4. Conduct Acknowledged and Adopted by the State as Its Own:
o Actions by individuals or groups that the state acknowledges and adopts as its own are
attributable to the state.
o Example: A state publicly endorsing the actions of a non-state actor.
Breach of an International Obligation
A breach occurs when a state's conduct is not in conformity with what is required by an international obligation.
This can involve:
1. Treaty Obligations:
o Violations of specific provisions of international treaties to which the state is a party.
o Example: Breaching a disarmament treaty by developing prohibited weapons.
2. Customary International Law:
o Violations of established customs that are accepted as binding by the international community.
o Example: Engaging in acts of piracy or slavery.
3. General Principles of Law:
o Violations of fundamental principles recognized by civilized nations.
o Example: Denying access to justice or fair trial rights.
Consequences of Internationally Wrongful Acts
When a state commits an internationally wrongful act, several legal consequences follow:
1. Cessation and Non-Repetition:
o The state must cease the wrongful act immediately and provide assurances that it will not be
repeated.
2. Reparation:
o The state is obligated to make full reparation for the injury caused by the wrongful act.
Reparation can take several forms:
 Restitution: Restoring the situation to what it was before the wrongful act occurred.
 Compensation: Providing financial payment for damages that cannot be remedied
by restitution.
Page 25 of 52

Defenses Precluding Wrongfulness
Certain circumstances can preclude the wrongfulness of an act that would otherwise constitute a breach of
international obligations. These defenses include:
1. Consent:
2. Self-Defense:
3. Countermeasures:
4. Force Majeure:
5. Distress:
way to save lives.
6. Necessity:
obligation exists.
Case Examples
o France was held responsible for the breach of its obligations under the agreement with New
Zealand regarding the Rainbow Warrior incident. France was required to pay compensation and
provide assurances of non-repetition.
o The International Court of Justice (ICJ) held Albania responsible for the damage caused to
British warships in the Corfu Channel and ordered Albania to pay compensation.
Conclusion
Internationally wrongful acts are central to the principles of state responsibility in international law. They involve
actions or omissions attributable to the state that breach international obligations. The consequences of such
acts include cessation, non-repetition, and reparation. The ILC's Articles on Responsibility of States for
Internationally Wrongful Acts provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing these
issues, ensuring that states are held accountable for their actions on the international stage.
Attribution of Conduct to the State
Attribution of conduct to the state is a fundamental principle in the law of state responsibility. It determines when
actions or omissions by individuals or entities can be legally considered as actions of the state itself. This principle
is crucial for establishing state responsibility for internationally wrongful acts.
Legal Framework
The International Law Commission (ILC) has codified the principles of attribution in the Articles on Responsibility
of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001). These articles outline the conditions under which conduct is
attributable to the state.
Key Principles of Attribution
1. Conduct of State Organs:
o Article 4: Actions or omissions by any state organ, whether legislative, executive, judicial, or
other, are attributable to the state. This includes all entities that are part of the state's
organizational structure.
o Example: A court's decision that violates international human rights standards is attributable
to the state.
2. Conduct of Persons or Entities Exercising Elements of Governmental Authority:
o Article 5: Actions by individuals or entities empowered by the state to exercise elements of
governmental authority are attributable to the state. This applies even if these entities are not
formally part of the state's organizational structure.
o Example: A private security company contracted by the government to perform police
functions.
3. Conduct of Persons Acting on the Instructions of, or Under the Direction or Control of, the
State:
o Article 8: Actions by individuals or groups acting under the state's instructions, direction, or
control are attributable to the state. This includes situations where the state exercises effective
control over the actions of these individuals or groups.
o Example: Paramilitary groups acting under the direction of state officials.
4. Conduct Acknowledged and Adopted by the State as Its Own:
o Article 11: Actions by individuals or groups that the state acknowledges and adopts as its own
are attributable to the state. This can occur even if the actions were initially unauthorized.
o Example: A state publicly endorsing the actions of a non-state actor.
Specific Scenarios of Attribution
1. Ultra Vires Acts:
Page 26 of 52
o Article 7: Acts of state organs or entities that exceed their authority (ultra vires acts) are still
attributable to the state if they are performed in an official capacity.
o Example: A police officer using excessive force beyond their legal authority.
2. Conduct of Insurrectional Movements:
o Article 10: Conduct of an insurrectional movement that becomes the new government of a
state or establishes a new state in part of the territory is attributable to the state.
o Example: A revolutionary group that overthrows the government and assumes control.
3. Conduct of Private Individuals:
o Generally, the actions of private individuals are not attributable to the state unless they fall
under the specific scenarios outlined above (e.g., acting under state control or direction).
Case Examples
1. Nicaragua v. United States (1986):
o The International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that the actions of the Contras, a rebel group in
Nicaragua, were not attributable to the United States because the level of control exercised by
the U.S. was not sufficient to meet the threshold of effective control required for attribution.
2. Tehran Hostages Case (1980):
o The ICJ held that the actions of Iranian militants who seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran were
attributable to Iran because the militants were acting under the direction and control of the
Iranian government.
3. Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (2007):
o The ICJ held that the actions of the Bosnian Serb forces were not attributable to Serbia because
Serbia did not exercise effective control over the specific operations in question.
Conclusion
Attribution of conduct to the state is a critical aspect of state responsibility in international law. It ensures that
states are held accountable for actions or omissions that violate international obligations. The principles codified
by the ILC provide a comprehensive framework for determining when conduct is attributable to the state,
covering a wide range of scenarios from actions by state organs to those by private individuals acting under state
control. Understanding these principles is essential for assessing state responsibility and ensuring compliance
with international law.
Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness
In the context of state responsibility, certain circumstances can preclude the wrongfulness of an act that would
otherwise constitute a breach of international obligations. These circumstances are recognized under the
International Law Commission's (ILC) Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts
(2001). They provide legal justifications or excuses for states to avoid liability for actions that would typically be
considered internationally wrongful.
Key Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness
1. Consent:
o Definition: If a state consents to the conduct of another state, the act is not considered
wrongful as long as it remains within the limits of the consent given.
o Legal Basis: Article 20 of the ILC Articles.
o Example: A state allowing another state to station troops on its territory.
2. Self-Defense:
o Definition: Actions taken in self-defence in accordance with the United Nations Charter (Article
51) are not considered wrongful.
o Example: A state using force to repel an armed attack.
3. Countermeasures:
o Definition: Measures taken by a state in response to a prior wrongful act by another state,
intended to induce compliance with international obligations.
o Conditions: Countermeasures must be proportionate, temporary, and aimed at inducing the
offending state to comply with its obligations.
o Example: Economic sanctions imposed in response to a breach of an international treaty.
4. Force Majeure:
o Definition: Unforeseeable and irresistible events beyond the state's control that make it
materially impossible to perform the obligation.
o Conditions: The event must be beyond the control of the state, and the state must not have
contributed to the situation.
o Example: Natural disasters preventing a state from fulfilling its treaty obligations.
5. Distress:
o Definition: Actions taken to save lives in situations of extreme peril, where there is no other
reasonable way to save lives.
o Conditions: The peril must be grave and imminent, and the action must be the only way to
save lives.
o Example: A state aircraft making an emergency landing in another state's territory to save
passengers' lives.
6. Necessity:
Page 27 of 52
o Definition: Actions taken to safeguard an essential interest against a grave and imminent
peril, provided they do not seriously impair an essential interest of the state or states towards
which the obligation exists.
o Conditions: The action must be the only way to safeguard the essential interest, and it must
not seriously impair the interests of other states.
o Example: A state diverting water from an international river to prevent a catastrophic drought.
Case Examples
1. Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia):
o The International Court of Justice (ICJ) considered Hungary's invocation of necessity to justify
its suspension of a dam project. The court found that the conditions for necessity were not met
because the peril was not grave and imminent, and there were other means to address the
environmental concerns.
o France invoked force majeure and distress to justify the removal of its agents from detention
in New Zealand. The arbitral tribunal found that the conditions for force majeure were not met,
but accepted distress as a valid defense for one of the agents due to a medical emergency.
Conclusion
Circumstances precluding wrongfulness provide states with legal justifications for actions that would otherwise
be considered breaches of international obligations. These circumstances include consent, self-defense,
countermeasures, force majeure, distress, and necessity. Each circumstance has specific conditions that must
be met to be valid, ensuring that states cannot arbitrarily invoke these defenses to avoid responsibility. The
principles codified by the ILC provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and applying these
circumstances in international law.
Reparation for Injury
Reparation for injury is a fundamental principle in the law of state responsibility, which mandates that a state
responsible for an internationally wrongful act must make full reparation for the injury caused by that act. This
principle is codified in the International Law Commission's (ILC) Articles on Responsibility of States for
Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001).
Definition and Scope
Reparation aims to eliminate the consequences of the wrongful act and restore the situation to what it would
have been if the act had not occurred. It encompasses various forms, including restitution, compensation, and
satisfaction.
Forms of Reparation
1. Restitution:
o Definition: Restitution involves re-establishing the situation that existed before the wrongful
act was committed.
o Scope: It is the primary form of reparation and is preferred whenever possible.
o Example: Returning property that was unlawfully seized.
2. Compensation:
o Definition: Compensation is required when restitution is not possible or does not fully repair
the injury. It covers any financially assessable damage, including loss of profits.
o Scope: Compensation should be sufficient to cover the actual loss suffered by the injured
state.
o Example: Paying for the repair or replacement of damaged infrastructure.
3. Satisfaction:
o Definition: Satisfaction is appropriate when the injury cannot be made good by restitution or
compensation. It often involves a formal acknowledgment of the breach, an expression of
regret, or a formal apology.
o Scope: Satisfaction may also include disciplinary action against the individuals responsible for
the wrongful act.
o Example: Issuing a formal apology for violating another state's sovereignty.
Legal Basis
The ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts provide a comprehensive framework
for reparation:
 Article 31: States that the responsible state is under an obligation to make full reparation for the injury
caused by the internationally wrongful act.
 Article 34: Outlines the forms of reparation, including restitution, compensation, and satisfaction.
 Article 35: Specifies that restitution must be provided unless it is materially impossible or involves a
burden out of all proportion to the benefit deriving from restitution instead of compensation.
 Article 36: Details the requirements for compensation, emphasizing that it should cover any financially
assessable damage.
 Article 37: Describes satisfaction, including the need for acknowledgment of the breach, expression of
regret, and formal apology.
Case Examples
o Context: France was held responsible for the breach of its obligations under the agreement
with New Zealand regarding the Rainbow Warrior incident.
Page 28 of 52
o Reparation: France was required to pay compensation and provide assurances of non-
repetition.
o Context: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) held Albania responsible for the damage
caused to British warships in the Corfu Channel.
o Reparation: Albania was ordered to pay compensation for the damage.
o Context: The ICJ considered Hungary's suspension of a dam project and Slovakia's
countermeasures.
o Reparation: The court emphasized the need for equitable reparation, considering both
restitution and compensation.
Conclusion
Reparation for injury is a cornerstone of the law of state responsibility, ensuring that states are held accountable
for their internationally wrongful acts. The forms of reparation—restitution, compensation, and satisfaction—
provide a comprehensive framework for addressing the consequences of such acts and restoring the injured state
to its rightful position. The principles codified by the ILC ensure that reparation is fair, adequate, and effective,
reflecting the fundamental tenets of justice and equity in international law.
Module 4: Treaties and International Organizations

Law of Treaties
Definition, Kinds, and Essentials
Definition of a Treaty
A treaty is a formal, legally binding written agreement between sovereign states or international organizations,
governed by international law. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) provides a comprehensive
definition and framework for treaties.
 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 2(1)(a): Defines a treaty as "an international
agreement concluded between States in written form and governed by international law, whether
embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments and whatever its particular
designation".
Kinds of Treaties
Treaties can be classified based on various criteria, including the number of parties involved, their purpose, and
their form.
1. Based on the Number of Parties:
o Bilateral Treaties: Agreements between two states or parties. Example: The Treaty of Paris
(1783) between the United States and Great Britain.
o Multilateral Treaties: Agreements involving more than two states or parties. Example: The
Geneva Conventions, which involve multiple states and set standards for humanitarian
treatment in war.
2. Based on Purpose:
o Political Treaties: Include peace treaties, alliances, and disarmament agreements. Example:
The Treaty of Versailles (1919), which ended World War I.
o Commercial Treaties: Deal with trade, tariffs, and navigation. Example: The General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)
o Constitutional and Administrative Treaties: Establish and regulate international
organizations. Example: The Charter of the United Nations (1945).
o Human Rights Treaties: Protect and promote human rights. Example: The International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
o Environmental Treaties: Address global environmental issues. Example: The Paris
Agreement on climate change.
3. Based on Form:
o Conventions: Formal agreements that are often multilateral and open for participation by
many states. Example: The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969).
o Protocols: Additional agreements that modify or add to existing treaties. Example: The Kyoto
Protocol, which supplements the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(UNFCCC).
o Accords, Pacts, and Charters: Other forms of treaties that may vary in formality and scope.
Example: The Atlantic Charter (1941).
Essentials of a Treaty
For a treaty to be valid and binding under international law, it must meet certain essential criteria:
o Written Form: A treaty must be in written form, as stipulated by the Vienna Convention on
the Law of Treaties.
o Parties with Legal Capacity: The parties to a treaty must have the legal capacity to enter
into international agreements. This typically includes sovereign states and recognized
o Intention to Create Legal Obligations: The parties must intend to create binding legal
obligations. This intention is often expressed in the preamble and the substantive provisions of
the treaty.
o Consent of the Parties: The parties must freely consent to the terms of the treaty. Consent
is usually given through signature, ratification, acceptance, or approval.
Page 29 of 52
o Compliance with International Law: The treaty must comply with existing international
law. Treaties that violate peremptory norms (jus cogens) of international law are considered
void.
o Registration and Publication: Treaties must be registered with the United Nations
Secretariat and published to ensure transparency and accessibility.
Process of Treaty-Making
1. Negotiation: Representatives of the states or organizations involved negotiate the terms of the treaty.
This process can take years, depending on the complexity and scope of the agreement.
2. Signature: Once the terms are agreed upon, the treaty is signed by the representatives. Signature
indicates the parties' intention to be bound by the treaty, but it does not yet create legal obligations.
3. Ratification: Ratification is the formal approval of the treaty by the competent authorities of the states
involved. This process varies according to the domestic laws and constitutions of each state.
4. Entry into Force: The treaty enters into force once the specified conditions are met, such as the deposit
of a certain number of ratifications. The treaty then becomes legally binding on the parties.
5. Implementation: States are required to implement the treaty's provisions in good faith, often through
domestic legislation and administrative measures.
Conclusion
Treaties are a cornerstone of international law, providing a formal mechanism for states and international
organizations to create binding legal obligations. Understanding the definition, kinds, and essentials of treaties
is crucial for comprehending their role in maintaining international order and cooperation. The Vienna Convention
on the Law of Treaties provides a comprehensive framework for the creation, interpretation, and enforcement of
treaties, ensuring that they serve as effective instruments of international relations.
Inception, Interpretation, and Termination of Treaties
Inception of Treaties
The inception of treaties involves several stages, from negotiation to entry into force. The Vienna Convention on
the Law of Treaties (1969) provides a comprehensive framework for the creation and operation of treaties.
1. Negotiation:
o Representatives of the states or international organizations involved negotiate the terms of the
treaty. This process can be lengthy and involves discussions, compromises, and drafting of the
treaty text.
2. Adoption of the Text:
o The text of the treaty is adopted by the consent of all the parties involved. This usually occurs
at a diplomatic conference or through other agreed-upon procedures.
3. Authentication:
o The treaty text is authenticated by the signatures of the representatives of the parties.
Authentication confirms that the text is final and accurate.
4. Signature:
o The treaty is signed by the representatives of the parties. Signature indicates the parties'
intention to be bound by the treaty, but it does not yet create legal obligations.
5. Ratification, Acceptance, or Approval:
o After signature, the treaty must be ratified, accepted, or approved by the competent authorities
of the states involved. This process varies according to the domestic laws and constitutions of
each state.
o Ratification: Typically involves the formal approval of the treaty by the legislative or executive
branch of the government.
o Acceptance/Approval: Similar to ratification but may involve different procedures depending
on the state's legal system.
6. Entry into Force:
o The treaty enters into force once the specified conditions are met, such as the deposit of a
certain number of ratifications. The treaty then becomes legally binding on the parties.
7. Registration and Publication:
o Treaties must be registered with the United Nations Secretariat and published to ensure
transparency and accessibility.
Interpretation of Treaties
The interpretation of treaties is governed by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), particularly
Articles 31 to 33. The goal is to determine the meaning and intent of the treaty provisions.
1. General Rule of Interpretation (Article 31):
o Good Faith: Treaties must be interpreted in good faith.
o Ordinary Meaning: The terms of the treaty are to be given their ordinary meaning in the
context of the treaty and in light of its object and purpose.
o Context: The context includes the text of the treaty, its preamble, annexes, and any
agreements or instruments made in connection with the treaty.
o Subsequent Agreements and Practice: Any subsequent agreements between the parties
regarding the interpretation of the treaty or subsequent practice in the application of the treaty
are also considered.
2. Supplementary Means of Interpretation (Article 32):
o If the interpretation according to Article 31 leaves the meaning ambiguous or obscure, or leads
to a result that is manifestly absurd or unreasonable, supplementary means of interpretation
may be used.
Page 30 of 52
o Preparatory Work: The preparatory work of the treaty (travaux préparatoires) and the
circumstances of its conclusion can be considered.
3. Interpretation of Treaties Authenticated in Two or More Languages (Article 33):
o When a treaty is authenticated in multiple languages, each text is equally authoritative unless
the treaty provides otherwise.
o If there is a difference in meaning between the texts, the meaning that best reconciles the
texts, having regard to the object and purpose of the treaty, shall be adopted.
Termination of Treaties
Treaties can be terminated or suspended under various circumstances as outlined in the Vienna Convention on
the Law of Treaties (1969).
1. By Agreement (Article 54):
o A treaty may be terminated or suspended by the consent of all the parties involved, following
the procedures specified in the treaty or by mutual agreement.
2. Breach of Treaty (Article 60):
o A material breach of a treaty by one of the parties entitles the other parties to invoke the
breach as a ground for terminating or suspending the treaty in whole or in part.
o Material Breach: A repudiation of the treaty not sanctioned by the Convention or a violation
of a provision essential to the accomplishment of the object or purpose of the treaty.
3. Impossibility of Performance (Article 61):
o A treaty may be terminated if the performance of the treaty becomes impossible due to the
permanent disappearance or destruction of an object indispensable for the execution of the
treaty.
4. Fundamental Change of Circumstances (Article 62):
o A fundamental change of circumstances, which was not foreseen by the parties, may be
invoked as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from the treaty if the existence of those
circumstances constituted an essential basis of the consent of the parties to be bound by the
treaty, and the effect of the change is radically to transform the extent of obligations still to be
performed under the treaty.
5. Emergence of a New Peremptory Norm (Article 64):
o If a new peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens) emerges, any existing
treaty in conflict with that norm becomes void and terminates.
6. Withdrawal or Denunciation (Article 56):
o A party may withdraw from or denounce a treaty if the treaty provides for such a possibility or
if the parties intended to admit the possibility of withdrawal or denunciation.
7. Procedure for Termination (Articles 65-68):
o The party seeking to terminate or withdraw from a treaty must notify the other parties of its
intention and the reasons for doing so.
o If there is an objection, the parties must seek a solution through negotiation or other peaceful
means.
o The termination or withdrawal takes effect in accordance with the provisions of the treaty or,
if not specified, after a reasonable period.
Rights and Duties of Parties

In international law, treaties are formal agreements between sovereign states or international organizations that
create binding legal obligations. The rights and duties of the parties to a treaty are fundamental to ensuring that
these agreements are respected and implemented effectively. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
(1969) provides a comprehensive framework for understanding these rights and duties.
Rights of Parties to a Treaty
1. Right to Participate in Treaty Negotiations:
o States and international organizations have the right to participate in the negotiation of
treaties. This includes the right to propose, discuss, and amend treaty provisions.
2. Right to Consent to be Bound:
o Parties have the right to consent to be bound by a treaty through signature, ratification,
acceptance, or approval. This consent is essential for the treaty to become legally binding on
the parties.
3. Right to Withdraw or Denounce:
o Parties have the right to withdraw from or denounce a treaty if the treaty provides for such a
possibility or if the parties intended to admit the possibility of withdrawal or denunciation. This
is governed by Article 56 of the Vienna Convention.
4. Right to Invoke Treaty Provisions:
o Parties have the right to invoke the provisions of a treaty to protect their interests. This includes
the right to seek enforcement of treaty obligations and to benefit from the rights conferred by
the treaty.
5. Right to Interpret the Treaty:
o Parties have the right to interpret the treaty in good faith, in accordance with the ordinary
meaning of its terms, in their context, and in light of its object and purpose (Article 31 of the
Vienna Convention).
6. Right to Seek Dispute Resolution:
Page 31 of 52
o Parties have the right to seek resolution of disputes arising from the interpretation or
application of the treaty. This can be through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or
adjudication by an international court or tribunal.
Duties of Parties to a Treaty
1. Duty to Perform Obligations in Good Faith (Pacta Sunt Servanda):
o Parties are obligated to perform their treaty obligations in good faith. This principle, known as
"pacta sunt servanda," is a cornerstone of international treaty law (Article 26 of the Vienna
Convention).
2. Duty to Refrain from Acts Defeating the Object and Purpose of the Treaty:
o Before a treaty enters into force, parties must refrain from acts that would defeat its object
and purpose (Article 18 of the Vienna Convention).
3. Duty to Implement Treaty Provisions:
o Parties are required to take necessary measures to implement the provisions of the treaty
within their domestic legal systems. This may involve enacting legislation, adopting
administrative measures, or taking other appropriate actions.
4. Duty to Settle Disputes Peacefully:
o Parties have a duty to settle disputes arising from the interpretation or application of the treaty
by peaceful means, in accordance with the principles of international law.
5. Duty to Notify and Consult:
o Parties have a duty to notify and consult with other parties regarding matters affecting the
implementation of the treaty. This includes providing information on measures taken to
implement the treaty and consulting on issues of common concern.
6. Duty to Respect Jus Cogens Norms:
o Parties must ensure that their treaty obligations do not conflict with peremptory norms of
general international law (jus cogens). Treaties that conflict with such norms are void (Article
53 of the Vienna Convention).
Case Examples
o The International Court of Justice (ICJ) emphasized the duty of parties to perform their treaty
obligations in good faith and to settle disputes peacefully. The court ruled that both Hungary
and Slovakia had violated their treaty obligations and called for negotiations to resolve the
dispute.
o The arbitral tribunal highlighted the duty of France to perform its treaty obligations in good
faith and to refrain from acts defeating the object and purpose of the treaty. France was found
to have breached its obligations under the agreement with New Zealand.
Conclusion
The rights and duties of parties to a treaty are essential for the effective functioning of international agreements.
These rights and duties ensure that treaties are negotiated, implemented, and enforced in a manner that respects
the principles of international law. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties provides a comprehensive
framework for understanding these rights and duties, emphasizing the importance of good faith, peaceful dispute
resolution, and respect for jus cogens norms.
Validity and Enforcement
Treaties: Validity and Enforcement
Validity of Treaties
The validity of treaties is governed by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), which sets out the
conditions under which treaties are considered valid and binding. Several factors can affect the validity of a
treaty:
1. Competence to Conclude Treaties:
o Only states and international organizations with the legal capacity to enter into treaties can do
so. The representatives of these entities must have the authority to negotiate and sign treaties.
o Article 7: Specifies who is considered competent to represent a state in the conclusion of a
treaty, such as heads of state, heads of government, and ministers for foreign affairs.
2. Consent to be Bound:
o The consent of the parties to be bound by the treaty must be freely given. This consent is
usually expressed through signature, ratification, acceptance, or approval.
o Article 11: Outlines the means by which consent to be bound by a treaty may be expressed.
3. Object and Purpose:
o The object and purpose of the treaty must be lawful. Treaties that conflict with peremptory
norms of general international law (jus cogens) are void.
o Article 53: States that a treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a
peremptory norm of general international law.
4. Absence of Coercion:
o The treaty must not be concluded under coercion or duress. Any treaty procured by the threat
or use of force is void.
o Article 52: Declares that a treaty is void if its conclusion has been procured by the threat or
use of force in violation of the principles of international law.
5. Fraud, Corruption, and Error:
o A treaty is invalid if it was concluded based on fraud, corruption, or a fundamental error.
o Articles 49-51: Address the invalidity of treaties due to fraud, corruption, and error.
Page 32 of 52
Enforcement of Treaties
The enforcement of treaties involves ensuring that the parties adhere to their obligations under the treaty.
Several mechanisms and principles facilitate the enforcement of treaties:
1. Pacta Sunt Servanda:
o This principle, meaning "agreements must be kept," is a cornerstone of international treaty
law. It obligates parties to perform their treaty obligations in good faith.
o Article 26: Enshrines the principle of pacta sunt servanda, stating that every treaty in force
is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.
2. Domestic Implementation:
o States are required to implement treaty obligations within their domestic legal systems. This
may involve enacting legislation or adopting administrative measures to give effect to the
treaty.
o Article 27: States that a party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification
for its failure to perform a treaty.
3. Monitoring and Compliance Mechanisms:
o Many treaties establish monitoring bodies or compliance mechanisms to oversee the
implementation of treaty obligations. These bodies may include committees, commissions, or
o Example: The Human Rights Committee monitors the implementation of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
4. Dispute Resolution:
o Treaties often include provisions for the resolution of disputes arising from their interpretation
or application. These provisions may provide for negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or
adjudication by an international court or tribunal.
o Article 33: Encourages parties to settle disputes by peaceful means, such as negotiation,
inquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, or resort to regional agencies
or arrangements.
5. Sanctions and Countermeasures:
o In cases of non-compliance, states may resort to sanctions or countermeasures to induce
compliance. These measures must be proportionate and aimed at restoring compliance with
the treaty.
o Example: Economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations Security Council in response to
violations of international obligations.
6. Role of International Organizations:
o International organizations, such as the United Nations, play a significant role in the
enforcement of treaties. They may facilitate negotiations, provide technical assistance, and
monitor compliance.
o Example: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) monitors compliance with the
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).
Case Examples
o The International Court of Justice (ICJ) emphasized the principle of pacta sunt servanda and
the obligation of states to perform their treaty obligations in good faith. The court ruled that
both Hungary and Slovakia had violated their treaty obligations and called for negotiations to
resolve the dispute.
o The arbitral tribunal highlighted the duty of France to perform its treaty obligations in good
faith and to refrain from acts defeating the object and purpose of the treaty. France was found
to have breached its obligations under the agreement with New Zealand and was required to
pay compensation and provide assurances of non-repetition.
Conclusion
The validity and enforcement of treaties are fundamental aspects of international law, ensuring that states and
international organizations adhere to their commitments. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties provides
a comprehensive framework for determining the validity of treaties and outlines the principles and mechanisms
for their enforcement. The principles of pacta sunt servanda, domestic implementation, monitoring and
compliance mechanisms, dispute resolution, and the role of international organizations are essential for
maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of international treaties.
The United Nations Organization
Principal Organs: General Assembly, Security Council, Economic and Social Council, International Court of Justice, Secretariat, Trusteeship
Council
The United Nations Organization: Principal Organs
The United Nations (UN) is an international organization founded in 1945, following the end of World War II, to
promote peace, security, and cooperation among states. The UN has six principal organs, each with specific
functions and responsibilities. These organs are the General Assembly, Security Council, Economic and Social
Council, International Court of Justice, Secretariat, and Trusteeship Council.
1. General Assembly
Definition and Composition:
 The General Assembly is the main deliberative body of the UN, comprising all 193 member
states, each with one vote.
Page 33 of 52
 It provides a unique forum for multilateral discussion of international issues covered by the UN
Charter.
Functions and Powers:
 Deliberation and Recommendations: The General Assembly discusses and makes
recommendations on a wide range of international issues, including peace and security,
development, human rights, and international law.
 Budgetary Control: It approves the UN budget and determines the financial contributions of
member states.
 Elections: The General Assembly elects non-permanent members of the Security Council,
members of the Economic and Social Council, and judges of the International Court of Justice.
It also appoints the Secretary-General on the recommendation of the Security Council.
 International Law: It initiates studies and makes recommendations to promote the
development and codification of international law.
Sessions:
 The General Assembly meets in regular annual sessions, and special sessions can be convened
at the request of the Security Council or a majority of member states.
2. Security Council
 The Security Council is responsible for maintaining international peace and security. It has 15
members: five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the
United States) with veto power, and ten non-permanent members elected for two-year terms.
 Peace and Security: The Security Council investigates disputes and situations that might lead
to international friction and recommends methods of adjustment or terms of settlement.
 Sanctions and Military Action: It can impose sanctions and authorize the use of force to
maintain or restore international peace and security.
 Peacekeeping Operations: The Security Council establishes and oversees UN peacekeeping
operations.
 Binding Decisions: Unlike the General Assembly, the Security Council's decisions are binding
on all UN member states.
Voting:
 Decisions on procedural matters require nine affirmative votes. Decisions on substantive
matters require nine votes, including the concurring votes of all five permanent members (the
veto power).
3. Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
 ECOSOC is responsible for promoting international economic and social cooperation and
development. It has 54 members elected by the General Assembly for three-year terms.
 Policy Review and Recommendations: ECOSOC conducts studies, makes
recommendations, and promotes respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
 Coordination: It coordinates the work of the UN's specialized agencies, functional
commissions, and regional commissions.
 Conferences and Summits: ECOSOC organizes major international conferences and summits
on economic, social, and environmental issues.
 Consultative Status: It grants consultative status to non-governmental organizations
(NGOs), allowing them to participate in its work.
4. International Court of Justice (ICJ)
 The ICJ, also known as the World Court, is the principal judicial organ of the UN. It is located
in The Hague, Netherlands, and consists of 15 judges elected by the General Assembly and the
Security Council for nine-year terms.
 Contentious Cases: The ICJ settles legal disputes between states submitted to it by those
states.
 Advisory Opinions: It provides advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by the
General Assembly, Security Council, or other UN organs and specialized agencies.
 Binding Judgments: The ICJ's judgments in contentious cases are binding on the parties
involved.
5. Secretariat
 The Secretariat is the administrative organ of the UN, headed by the Secretary-General, who
is appointed by the General Assembly on the recommendation of the Security Council for a
five-year renewable term.
 Administrative Support: The Secretariat provides administrative and logistical support to
the other UN organs.
Page 34 of 52
 Implementation: It implements the decisions of the UN and manages its day-to-day

operations.
 Research and Analysis: The Secretariat conducts research and analysis on various
international issues and prepares reports for the General Assembly, Security Council, and other
UN bodies.
 Diplomatic Functions: The Secretary-General acts as a mediator in international disputes
and represents the UN at international conferences and meetings.
6. Trusteeship Council
 The Trusteeship Council was established to oversee the administration of trust territories and
ensure that their inhabitants were prepared for self-government. It consists of the five
permanent members of the Security Council.
 Supervision: The Trusteeship Council supervises the administration of trust territories and
ensures that the administering authorities promote the political, economic, social, and
educational advancement of the inhabitants.
 Reports and Visits: It examines reports from the administering authorities and conducts
periodic visits to the trust territories.
 Termination of Trusteeships: The Trusteeship Council makes recommendations on the
termination of trusteeships and the attainment of self-government or independence by the
trust territories.
Current Status:
 With the independence of Palau in 1994, the last remaining trust territory, the Trusteeship
Council has suspended its operations. However, it remains in existence and can be reactivated
if necessary.
Conclusion
The principal organs of the United Nations each play a vital role in maintaining international peace and security,
promoting social and economic development, and upholding international law. The General Assembly, Security
Council, Economic and Social Council, International Court of Justice, Secretariat, and Trusteeship Council work
together to achieve the UN's objectives and address global challenges. Understanding the functions and powers
of these organs is essential for comprehending the structure and operation of the United Nations.
Functions and Powers
Functions and Powers of the United Nations (UN)
The United Nations (UN) is an international organization founded in 1945 to promote peace, security, and
cooperation among states. The UN has six principal organs, each with specific functions and powers. These
organs are the General Assembly, Security Council, Economic and Social Council, International Court of Justice,
Secretariat, and Trusteeship Council.
1. General Assembly
Composition:
 Comprises all 193 member states, each with one vote.
 Deliberation and Recommendations: Discusses and makes recommendations on a wide
range of international issues, including peace and security, development, human rights, and
international law.
 Budgetary Control: Approves the UN budget and determines the financial contributions of
member states.
 Elections: Elects non-permanent members of the Security Council, members of the Economic
and Social Council, and judges of the International Court of Justice. It also appoints the
Secretary-General on the recommendation of the Security Council.
 International Law: Initiates studies and makes recommendations to promote the
development and codification of international law.
 Sessions: Meets in regular annual sessions, and special sessions can be convened at the
request of the Security Council or a majority of member states.
2. Security Council
Composition:
 Consists of 15 members: five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom,
and the United States) with veto power, and ten non-permanent members elected for two-year
terms.
 Peace and Security: Investigates disputes and situations that might lead to international
friction and recommends methods of adjustment or terms of settlement.
 Sanctions and Military Action: Can impose sanctions and authorize the use of force to
maintain or restore international peace and security.
 Peacekeeping Operations: Establishes and oversees UN peacekeeping operations.
 Binding Decisions: Unlike the General Assembly, the Security Council's decisions are binding
on all UN member states.
Page 35 of 52
 Voting: Decisions on procedural matters require nine affirmative votes. Decisions on

substantive matters require nine votes, including the concurring votes of all five permanent
members (the veto power).
3. Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
Composition:
 Comprises 54 members elected by the General Assembly for three-year terms.
 Policy Review and Recommendations: Conducts studies, makes recommendations, and
promotes respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
 Coordination: Coordinates the work of the UN's specialized agencies, functional commissions,
and regional commissions.
 Conferences and Summits: Organizes major international conferences and summits on
economic, social, and environmental issues.
 Consultative Status: Grants consultative status to non-governmental organizations (NGOs),
allowing them to participate in its work.
4. International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Composition:
 Consists of 15 judges elected by the General Assembly and the Security Council for nine-year
terms.
 Contentious Cases: Settles legal disputes between states submitted to it by those states.
 Advisory Opinions: Provides advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by the General
Assembly, Security Council, or other UN organs and specialized agencies.
 Binding Judgments: The ICJ's judgments in contentious cases are binding on the parties
involved.
5. Secretariat
Composition:
 Headed by the Secretary-General, who is appointed by the General Assembly on the
recommendation of the Security Council for a five-year renewable term.
 Administrative Support: Provides administrative and logistical support to the other UN
organs.
 Implementation: Implements the decisions of the UN and manages its day-to-day
operations.
 Research and Analysis: Conducts research and analysis on various international issues and
prepares reports for the General Assembly, Security Council, and other UN bodies.
 Diplomatic Functions: The Secretary-General acts as a mediator in international disputes
and represents the UN at international conferences and meetings.
6. Trusteeship Council
Composition:
 Consists of the five permanent members of the Security Council.
 Supervision: Oversees the administration of trust territories and ensures that the
administering authorities promote the political, economic, social, and educational advancement
of the inhabitants.
 Reports and Visits: Examines reports from the administering authorities and conducts
periodic visits to the trust territories.
 Termination of Trusteeships: Makes recommendations on the termination of trusteeships
and the attainment of self-government or independence by the trust territories.
Current Status:
 With the independence of Palau in 1994, the last remaining trust territory, the Trusteeship
Council has suspended its operations. However, it remains in existence and can be reactivated
if necessary.
Conclusion
The principal organs of the United Nations each play a vital role in maintaining international peace and security,
promoting social and economic development, and upholding international law. The General Assembly, Security
Council, Economic and Social Council, International Court of Justice, Secretariat, and Trusteeship Council work
together to achieve the UN's objectives and address global challenges. Understanding the functions and powers
of these organs is essential for comprehending the structure and operation of the United Nations.
International Specialized Agencies and NGOs

International Labour Organization (ILO)
The International Labour Organization (ILO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations that focuses on
promoting social justice and internationally recognized human and labor rights. Established in 1919 as part of
the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I, the ILO is the only tripartite U.N. agency, bringing together
Page 36 of 52
governments, employers, and workers to set labor standards, develop policies, and devise programs promoting
decent work for all women and men.
Objectives and Mission
The ILO's primary objective is to promote rights at work, encourage decent employment opportunities, enhance
social protection, and strengthen dialogue on work-related issues. Its mission is to advance social and economic
justice through setting international labor standards.
Structure and Governance
The ILO operates through a unique tripartite structure that ensures the views of the social partners
(governments, employers, and workers) are closely reflected in its labor standards and policies. The main organs
of the ILO are:
1. International Labour Conference (ILC):
o Composition: The ILC is the ILO's supreme decision-making body, often referred to as the
"world parliament of labor." It meets annually and is composed of representatives from the
member states' governments, employers, and workers.
o Functions: The ILC sets international labor standards, adopts the ILO's budget, and elects the
Governing Body. It also discusses key social and labor questions and adopts resolutions that
provide guidelines for the ILO's policies and activities.
2. Governing Body:
o Composition: The Governing Body is the executive council of the ILO, composed of 56 titular
members (28 government representatives, 14 employer representatives, and 14 worker
representatives) and 66 deputy members.
o Functions: It meets three times a year and takes decisions on ILO policy, establishes the
program and budget, and elects the Director-General.
3. International Labour Office:
o Composition: The International Labour Office is the permanent secretariat of the ILO, headed
by the Director-General.
o Functions: It is responsible for implementing the decisions of the ILC and the Governing Body,
providing technical assistance to member states, and conducting research and publishing
reports on labor issues.
Functions and Activities
1. Setting International Labor Standards:
o The ILO sets international labor standards through conventions and recommendations.
Conventions are legally binding international treaties that member states are encouraged to
ratify and implement. Recommendations are non-binding guidelines that provide direction for
national policy and practice.
o Examples: The ILO has adopted numerous conventions, such as the Forced Labour Convention
(No. 29), the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention (No.
87), and the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (No. 182).
2. Promoting Decent Work:
o The ILO promotes the Decent Work Agenda, which aims to achieve decent and productive work
for all, in conditions of freedom, equity, security, and human dignity. This agenda focuses on
four strategic objectives: promoting jobs, guaranteeing rights at work, extending social
protection, and promoting social dialogue.
3. Technical Assistance and Capacity Building:
o The ILO provides technical assistance to member states to help them implement labor
standards and improve their labor market policies. This includes training programs, advisory
services, and capacity-building initiatives.
4. Research and Publications:
o The ILO conducts research on various labor and social issues and publishes reports, studies,
and statistical data. Notable publications include the "World Employment and Social Outlook"
and the "Global Wage Report."
5. Monitoring and Supervision:
o The ILO monitors the application of international labor standards through a supervisory system
that includes regular reporting by member states, observations by employers' and workers'
organizations, and examination by independent experts.
6. Promoting Social Dialogue:
o The ILO fosters social dialogue among governments, employers, and workers to address labor
issues and promote consensus-building. This includes facilitating negotiations, consultations,
and information exchange on labor policies and practices.
Achievements and Impact
1. Improvement of Labor Conditions:
o The ILO has significantly contributed to improving labor conditions worldwide by setting
standards that protect workers' rights, promote fair wages, and ensure safe working
environments.
2. Eradication of Child Labor:
o The ILO has played a crucial role in combating child labor through conventions and programs
aimed at eliminating the worst forms of child labor and promoting education and vocational
training for children.
3. Promotion of Gender Equality:
Page 37 of 52
o The ILO has been instrumental in promoting gender equality in the workplace, advocating for
equal pay for equal work, and addressing issues such as maternity protection and workplace
discrimination.
4. Support for Vulnerable Workers:
o The ILO has developed programs to support vulnerable workers, including migrant workers,
informal economy workers, and those affected by economic crises and natural disasters.
Conclusion
The International Labour Organization (ILO) is a pivotal institution in the global effort to promote social justice
and protect labor rights. Through its unique tripartite structure, the ILO sets international labor standards,
provides technical assistance, conducts research, and fosters social dialogue. Its work has led to significant
improvements in labor conditions, the eradication of child labor, the promotion of gender equality, and the
support of vulnerable workers. The ILO continues to play a vital role in shaping the future of work and ensuring
decent work for all.
World Trade Organization (WTO)
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is an international organization that regulates and facilitates international
trade between nations. Established on January 1, 1995, it succeeded the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
(GATT), which was created in 1948. The WTO aims to ensure that trade flows as smoothly, predictably, and
freely as possible.
The primary objectives of the WTO are to:
1. Promote Free Trade: By reducing barriers to trade such as tariffs, quotas, and subsidies.
2. Ensure Fair Competition: By establishing a level playing field for all member countries.
3. Encourage Economic Growth and Employment: By fostering an open and predictable trading
environment.
4. Enhance the Welfare of People: By ensuring that trade contributes to economic development and
poverty reduction.
5. Protect the Environment: By promoting sustainable development and considering environmental
protection in trade policies.
The WTO operates through a structured framework that includes several key bodies:
1. Ministerial Conference:
o Composition: The highest decision-making body, comprising representatives (usually trade
ministers) from all member countries.
o Functions: Meets at least once every two years to make major decisions on trade agreements
and policies.
2. General Council:
o Composition: Consists of representatives from all member countries, usually ambassadors or
heads of delegation.
o Functions: Manages the day-to-day operations of the WTO and meets regularly to oversee
the implementation of agreements and handle disputes. It also convenes as the Dispute
Settlement Body and the Trade Policy Review Body.
3. Councils for Trade:
o Council for Trade in Goods: Oversees the implementation of agreements related to trade in
goods.
o Council for Trade in Services: Manages agreements related to trade in services.
o Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS): Oversees
the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement.
4. Committees and Working Groups:
o Various specialized committees and working groups address specific issues such as agriculture,
market access, trade and environment, and trade and development.
5. Secretariat:
o Composition: Headed by the Director-General, the Secretariat provides technical and
administrative support to the WTO's bodies.
o Functions: Assists in the implementation of agreements, provides technical assistance to
developing countries, and conducts research and analysis on trade issues.
Functions and Activities
1. Trade Negotiations:
o The WTO provides a forum for member countries to negotiate trade agreements aimed at
reducing barriers to trade. These negotiations take place during trade rounds, the most recent
being the Doha Development Round.
2. Implementation and Monitoring:
o The WTO oversees the implementation of trade agreements and monitors compliance by
member countries. This includes reviewing national trade policies and ensuring that they align
with WTO rules.
3. Dispute Settlement:
o The WTO has a robust dispute settlement mechanism to resolve trade disputes between
member countries. The Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) administers this process, which
includes consultations, panels, and appellate review.
4. Building Trade Capacity:
o The WTO provides technical assistance and training to developing countries to help them build
their trade capacity and integrate into the global trading system.
Page 38 of 52
5. Outreach and Cooperation:

o The WTO engages with various stakeholders, including governments, international
organizations, civil society, and the private sector, to promote understanding and cooperation
on trade issues.
Key Agreements
1. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT):
o The foundational agreement that established the principles of non-discrimination,
transparency, and the reduction of trade barriers.
2. General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS):
o Covers trade in services and aims to create a credible and reliable system of international trade
rules.
3. Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS):
o Establishes minimum standards for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property
rights.
4. Agreement on Agriculture (AoA):
o Aims to reform trade in agriculture and make policies more market-oriented.
5. Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS):
o Sets out the basic rules for food safety and animal and plant health standards.
6. Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT):
o Ensures that technical regulations, standards, and conformity assessment procedures do not
create unnecessary obstacles to trade.
1. Reduction of Trade Barriers:
o The WTO has significantly reduced tariffs and other trade barriers, facilitating increased global
trade and economic growth.
2. Dispute Resolution:
o The WTO's dispute settlement mechanism has resolved numerous trade disputes, helping to
maintain stability and predictability in the global trading system.
3. Support for Developing Countries:
o The WTO has provided technical assistance and capacity-building support to developing
countries, helping them to participate more effectively in global trade.
4. Promotion of Fair Competition:
o The WTO's rules and agreements promote fair competition and prevent trade practices that
distort markets.
Challenges and Criticisms
1. Stalled Negotiations:
o The Doha Development Round has faced significant challenges, with member countries unable
to reach consensus on key issues.
2. Trade Protectionism:
o Rising protectionist measures by some countries pose a threat to the principles of free trade
and the multilateral trading system.
3. Inclusivity and Equity:
o Critics argue that the WTO's policies and agreements often favor developed countries and do
not adequately address the needs and concerns of developing countries.
4. Environmental and Social Concerns:
o There are concerns that the WTO's focus on trade liberalization may sometimes conflict with
environmental protection and social equity goals.
Conclusion
The World Trade Organization (WTO) plays a crucial role in regulating and facilitating international trade,
promoting economic growth, and ensuring fair competition. Through its structured framework, key agreements,
and various functions, the WTO aims to create a stable and predictable trading environment. Despite facing
challenges and criticisms, the WTO continues to be a central institution in the global trading system, working
towards the goal of free and fair trade for all member countries.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is a specialized agency of the
United Nations aimed at promoting world peace and security through international cooperation in education, the
sciences, and culture. Established in 1945, UNESCO seeks to build networks among nations that enable solidarity
by mobilizing for education, building intercultural understanding, pursuing scientific cooperation, and protecting
freedom of expression.
UNESCO's mission is to contribute to the building of peace, the eradication of poverty, sustainable development,
and intercultural dialogue through education, the sciences, culture, communication, and information. Its
objectives include:
1. Promoting Education:
o Ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities
for all.
o Supporting the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4) which aims to "ensure
inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all."
2. Fostering Cultural Diversity:
o Protecting and promoting cultural heritage and the equal dignity of all cultures.
Page 39 of 52
o Encouraging the identification, protection, and preservation of cultural and natural heritage
around the world, including through the World Heritage Convention.
3. Advancing Scientific Cooperation:
o Promoting scientific research and knowledge sharing to address global challenges.
o Supporting the development of science policies and the strengthening of science education.
4. Promoting Freedom of Expression:
o Defending freedom of expression, press freedom, and access to information.
o Supporting the development of free, independent, and pluralistic media.
UNESCO operates through a structured framework that includes several key bodies:
1. General Conference:
o Composition: Comprises representatives of all member states and meets every two years.
o Functions: Determines the policies and main lines of work of the organization, approves the
budget, and elects the members of the Executive Board and the Director-General.
2. Executive Board:
o Composition: Consists of 58 member states elected by the General Conference for four-year
terms.
o Functions: Prepares the work of the General Conference and ensures the proper execution of
its decisions. It also oversees the implementation of UNESCO's programs and budget.
3. Secretariat:
o Composition: Headed by the Director-General, who is appointed by the General Conference
for a four-year term.
o Functions: Implements the decisions of the General Conference and the Executive Board,
manages the day-to-day operations of UNESCO, and provides support to member states.
Key Programs and Initiatives
1. Education for All (EFA):
o A global movement led by UNESCO aiming to meet the learning needs of all children, youth,
and adults by 2015. It focuses on six key education goals, including expanding early childhood
care, ensuring universal primary education, and improving adult literacy.
2. World Heritage Program:
o Aims to identify, protect, and preserve cultural and natural heritage around the world
considered to be of outstanding value to humanity. Sites are listed on the World Heritage List,
and member states commit to their protection.
3. Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Program:
o Promotes sustainable development based on local community efforts and sound science. It
includes the designation of biosphere reserves, which are areas of terrestrial and coastal
ecosystems promoting solutions to reconcile the conservation of biodiversity with its
sustainable use.
4. International Hydrological Programme (IHP):
o The only intergovernmental program of the UN system devoted to water research, water
resources management, and education and capacity building in the field of hydrology.
5. Memory of the World Program:
o Aims to preserve and provide access to documentary heritage of global significance. It includes
a register of documents, manuscripts, oral traditions, audiovisual materials, and library and
archive holdings.
6. Creative Cities Network:
o Encourages cities to foster creativity as a strategic factor for sustainable urban development.
It includes cities recognized for their contributions to literature, film, music, crafts and folk art,
design, media arts, and gastronomy.
1. Promotion of Literacy and Education:
o UNESCO has played a significant role in promoting literacy and education worldwide,
particularly in developing countries. Its initiatives have contributed to increased access to
education and improved literacy rates.
2. Protection of Cultural Heritage:
o Through the World Heritage Program, UNESCO has helped protect and preserve numerous
cultural and natural sites of outstanding value, ensuring their conservation for future
generations.
3. Advancement of Scientific Research:
o UNESCO has supported scientific research and cooperation, contributing to advancements in
various fields, including water management, environmental conservation, and disaster risk
reduction.
4. Promotion of Cultural Diversity:
o UNESCO has promoted cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue, fostering mutual
understanding and respect among different cultures.
5. Support for Freedom of Expression:
o UNESCO has advocated for freedom of expression and press freedom, supporting the
development of free and independent media and promoting access to information.
Conclusion
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) plays a vital role in promoting
peace, sustainable development, and intercultural dialogue through its work in education, the sciences, culture,
Page 40 of 52
and communication. Its programs and initiatives have had a significant impact on global education, cultural
heritage preservation, scientific cooperation, and freedom of expression. Through its structured framework and
collaborative efforts with member states and other stakeholders, UNESCO continues to contribute to the building
of a more just and peaceful world.
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) is a specialized agency of the United Nations dedicated to providing
humanitarian and developmental aid to children worldwide. Established in 1946 to provide emergency food and
healthcare to children in countries that had been devastated by World War II, UNICEF has since expanded its
mission to address the long-term needs of children and mothers in developing countries.
UNICEF's mission is to advocate for the protection of children's rights, to help meet their basic needs, and to
expand their opportunities to reach their full potential. The organization is guided by the Convention on the
Rights of the Child (CRC), which sets out the civil, political, economic, social, health, and cultural rights of
children.
Key Functions and Activities
1. Child Survival and Development:
o Health and Nutrition: UNICEF works to reduce child mortality by providing essential health
services, improving nutrition, and ensuring access to clean water and sanitation.
o Immunization: The organization conducts immunization campaigns to protect children from
preventable diseases such as polio, measles, and tetanus.
2. Education:
o Access to Education: UNICEF promotes access to quality education for all children, with a
focus on girls and marginalized groups.
o Early Childhood Development: The organization supports early childhood education
programs to ensure that children are ready to start school.
3. Child Protection:
o Violence and Exploitation: UNICEF works to protect children from violence, exploitation, and
abuse, including child labor and trafficking.
o Legal Identity: The organization advocates for the registration of births to ensure that
children have a legal identity and can access their rights.
4. Emergency Response:
o Humanitarian Aid: In times of crisis, such as natural disasters or armed conflicts, UNICEF
provides emergency relief, including food, water, shelter, and medical care.
o Rehabilitation and Recovery: The organization supports the rehabilitation and recovery of
children affected by emergencies, helping them return to normalcy.
5. Advocacy and Policy:
o Child Rights: UNICEF advocates for the implementation of policies and laws that protect and
promote the rights of children.
o Research and Data: The organization conducts research and collects data to inform policies
and programs aimed at improving the lives of children.
1. Executive Board:
o Composition: The Executive Board is composed of representatives from 36 member states,
elected by the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) for three-year terms.
o Functions: The Board provides intergovernmental support and oversight to UNICEF, approving
policies, programs, and budgets.
2. Secretariat:
o Composition: The Secretariat is headed by the Executive Director, who is appointed by the
United Nations Secretary-General.
o Functions: The Secretariat is responsible for the day-to-day operations of UNICEF,
implementing programs and managing resources.
1. Reduction in Child Mortality:
o UNICEF's efforts in immunization, nutrition, and healthcare have contributed to a significant
reduction in child mortality rates worldwide.
2. Education for All:
o The organization has played a crucial role in increasing access to education, particularly for
girls and children in conflict-affected areas.
3. Protection from Violence and Exploitation:
o UNICEF's programs have helped protect millions of children from violence, exploitation, and
abuse, providing them with safe environments to grow and thrive.
4. Emergency Relief:
o In times of crisis, UNICEF's rapid response has saved countless lives and helped communities
recover and rebuild.
Conclusion
UNICEF is a vital organization in the global effort to protect and promote the rights and well-being of children.
Through its comprehensive programs in health, education, child protection, and emergency response, UNICEF
has made significant strides in improving the lives of children around the world. Its advocacy and policy work
continue to drive progress towards a world where every child can realize their full potential.
Page 41 of 52
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is the United Nations' global development network,
established in 1965. It aims to eradicate poverty, reduce inequalities, and build resilience so countries can sustain
progress. The UNDP operates in approximately 170 countries and territories, helping to achieve the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs).
UNDP's mission is to support countries in achieving sustainable development by focusing on three main areas:
1. Sustainable Development: Promoting inclusive and sustainable economic growth, employment, and
decent work for all.
2. Democratic Governance and Peacebuilding: Strengthening democratic governance, rule of law, and
peacebuilding efforts.
3. Climate and Disaster Resilience: Enhancing resilience to climate change and natural disasters, and
promoting environmental sustainability.
Key Functions and Activities
1. Policy Advice and Technical Assistance:
o UNDP provides policy advice, technical assistance, and capacity-building support to help
countries design and implement development strategies and policies.
2. Program Implementation:
o The organization implements a wide range of development programs and projects in
partnership with governments, civil society, and the private sector. These programs address
issues such as poverty reduction, gender equality, health, education, and environmental
sustainability.
3. Advocacy and Knowledge Sharing:
o UNDP advocates for sustainable development and the achievement of the SDGs. It also
facilitates knowledge sharing and the exchange of best practices among countries and
development partners.
4. Funding and Resource Mobilization:
o UNDP mobilizes financial resources from various sources, including governments, international
organizations, and the private sector, to support development initiatives.
5. Monitoring and Evaluation:
o The organization monitors and evaluates the impact of its programs and projects to ensure
accountability and effectiveness. It uses data and evidence to inform policy and program
decisions.
1. Executive Board:
o Composition: The Executive Board is composed of representatives from 36 member states,
elected by the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) for three-year terms.
o Functions: The Board provides intergovernmental support and oversight to UNDP, approving
policies, programs, and budgets.
2. Administrator:
o Role: The Administrator is the head of UNDP and is appointed by the United Nations Secretary-
General. The Administrator is responsible for the overall management and administration of
the organization.
3. Country Offices:
o Functions: UNDP operates through a network of country offices that work closely with national
governments and other stakeholders to implement development programs and projects.
1. Poverty Reduction: UNDP has played a significant role in reducing poverty and improving living
standards in many countries through its development programs and initiatives.
2. Promotion of Gender Equality: The organization has been instrumental in promoting gender equality
and empowering women, contributing to significant progress in areas such as education, health, and
economic participation.
3. Climate Action and Environmental Sustainability: UNDP has supported countries in addressing
climate change and promoting environmental sustainability through initiatives such as renewable energy
projects, conservation programs, and disaster risk reduction efforts.
4. Strengthening Democratic Governance: The organization has helped strengthen democratic
governance and the rule of law in many countries by supporting electoral processes, judicial reforms,
and anti-corruption measures.
Conclusion
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is a vital organization in the global effort to achieve
sustainable development and eradicate poverty. Through its comprehensive programs and initiatives, UNDP
supports countries in addressing key development challenges, promoting inclusive growth, and building
resilience. Its work in policy advice, program implementation, advocacy, and resource mobilization has had a
significant impact on improving the lives of people around the world.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible
for coordinating the organization's environmental activities and assisting developing countries in implementing
environmentally sound policies and practices. Established in 1972 following the United Nations Conference on
the Human Environment in Stockholm, UNEP's mission is to provide leadership and encourage partnership in
caring for the environment by inspiring, informing, and enabling nations and peoples to improve their quality of
life without compromising that of future generations.
Page 42 of 52

UNEP's mission is to promote sustainable development and ensure that environmental considerations are
integrated into the development process. Its objectives include:
1. Environmental Governance: Strengthening international environmental governance and promoting
the development and implementation of international environmental laws and policies.
2. Sustainable Development: Supporting sustainable development by integrating environmental
considerations into economic and social policies and practices.
3. Environmental Science and Information: Providing scientific assessments, data, and information to
support environmental decision-making and policy development.
4. Capacity Building and Technology Transfer: Assisting countries, particularly developing nations, in
building capacity and accessing environmentally sound technologies.
5. Environmental Awareness and Education: Raising awareness and promoting education on
environmental issues to foster a global culture of sustainability.
UNEP operates through a structured framework that includes several key bodies:
1. United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA):
o Composition: The UNEA is the world's highest-level decision-making body on the
environment, comprising representatives from all 193 UN member states.
o Functions: It meets biennially to set priorities for global environmental policies and develop
international environmental law. It also provides guidance to UNEP and promotes a strong
science-policy interface.
2. Committee of Permanent Representatives (CPR):
o Composition: The CPR consists of representatives from member states who are based in
Nairobi, Kenya, where UNEP's headquarters are located.
o Functions: It acts as a subsidiary body to the UNEA, providing advice and oversight on the
implementation of UNEA decisions and UNEP's work program.
3. Executive Director:
o Role: The Executive Director is the head of UNEP and is appointed by the UN Secretary-
General. The Executive Director is responsible for the overall management and administration
of UNEP and represents the organization at international forums.
4. Secretariat: Functions: The Secretariat supports the work of UNEP by implementing its programs,
conducting research, and providing technical assistance to member states.
1. Climate Change: UNEP works to mitigate climate change by promoting renewable energy, energy
efficiency, and sustainable land use practices. It also supports adaptation efforts to help countries cope
with the impacts of climate change.
2. Biodiversity and Ecosystems: UNEP promotes the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity
and ecosystems. It supports the implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and
other international agreements related to biodiversity.
3. Chemicals and Waste: UNEP addresses the management of hazardous chemicals and waste to protect
human health and the environment. It supports the implementation of international agreements such
as the Basel, Rotterdam, and Stockholm Conventions.
4. Resource Efficiency: UNEP promotes sustainable consumption and production patterns to reduce the
environmental impact of economic activities. It supports initiatives such as the 10-Year Framework of
Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production (10YFP).
5. Environmental Governance: UNEP works to strengthen environmental governance at the global,
regional, and national levels. It promotes the development and implementation of environmental laws,
policies, and institutions.
6. Disasters and Conflicts: UNEP addresses the environmental dimensions of disasters and conflicts by
providing technical assistance and capacity building to countries affected by environmental
emergencies.
1. Global Environmental Conventions:
o UNEP has played a key role in the development and implementation of major international
environmental agreements, including the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the
Ozone Layer, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Paris Agreement on climate
change.
2. Scientific Assessments:
o UNEP conducts comprehensive scientific assessments, such as the Global Environment Outlook
(GEO) reports, which provide critical information on the state of the global environment and
inform policy decisions.
3. Capacity Building:
o UNEP has provided technical assistance and capacity-building support to numerous countries,
helping them develop and implement environmental policies and practices.
4. Public Awareness and Education:
o UNEP has raised global awareness of environmental issues through campaigns such as World
Environment Day and initiatives like the UNEP Champions of the Earth award.
Conclusion
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is a vital organization in the global effort to promote
sustainable development and protect the environment. Through its comprehensive programs and initiatives,
UNEP supports countries in addressing key environmental challenges, integrating environmental considerations
Page 43 of 52
into development policies, and building capacity for sustainable practices. Its work in climate change,
biodiversity, chemicals and waste management, resource efficiency, and environmental governance has had a
significant impact on improving the quality of life for people around the world while safeguarding the planet for
future generations.
Amnesty International
Amnesty International is a global non-governmental organization (NGO) focused on human rights. Founded in
1961 by British lawyer Peter Benenson, Amnesty International seeks to draw attention to human rights abuses
and campaigns for compliance with international laws and standards. The organization operates independently
of any government, political ideology, economic interest, or religion.
Amnesty International's mission is to conduct research and generate action to prevent and end grave abuses of
human rights and to demand justice for those whose rights have been violated. Its objectives include:
1. Protecting Human Rights:
o Advocating for the protection of human rights as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights and other international human rights instruments.
2. Ending Human Rights Abuses:
o Campaigning to end human rights abuses such as torture, extrajudicial executions, and
enforced disappearances.
3. Promoting Freedom of Expression:
o Defending the right to freedom of expression and fighting against censorship and persecution
of journalists and activists.
4. Abolishing the Death Penalty:
o Working towards the abolition of the death penalty worldwide.
5. Supporting Refugees and Asylum Seekers:
o Advocating for the rights of refugees and asylum seekers and providing support to those fleeing
persecution and conflict.
Amnesty International operates through a structured framework that includes several key bodies:
1. International Secretariat:
o Composition: The International Secretariat is the central body responsible for the day-to-day
operations of Amnesty International. It is headed by the Secretary-General.
o Functions: It coordinates global research, campaigns, and advocacy efforts, and provides
support to national sections and structures.
2. International Board:
o Composition: The International Board is elected by the Global Assembly and is responsible
for the overall governance of the organization.
o Functions: It sets strategic direction, ensures accountability, and oversees the work of the
International Secretariat.
3. Global Assembly:
o Composition: The Global Assembly is the highest decision-making body of Amnesty
International, comprising representatives from national sections and structures.
o Functions: It meets annually to discuss and decide on key issues, policies, and strategies.
1. Human Rights Education: Amnesty International conducts human rights education programs to raise
awareness and empower individuals to defend their rights and the rights of others.
2. Campaigns and Advocacy: The organization runs global and regional campaigns on various human
rights issues, such as ending violence against women, protecting the rights of indigenous peoples, and
promoting corporate accountability.
3. Research and Reporting: Amnesty International conducts in-depth research and publishes reports on
human rights violations. These reports are used to inform advocacy efforts and hold perpetrators
accountable.
4. Urgent Action Network: The Urgent Action Network mobilizes members and supporters to take
immediate action on behalf of individuals at risk of human rights abuses. This includes writing letters,
signing petitions, and engaging in social media campaigns.
5. Legal and Policy Advocacy: Amnesty International engages in legal and policy advocacy to influence
governments, international organizations, and corporations to adopt and implement human rights
standards.
1. Release of Prisoners of Conscience: Amnesty International has successfully campaigned for the
release of numerous prisoners of conscience—individuals imprisoned solely for their beliefs, ethnicity,
gender, or other characteristics.
2. Abolition of the Death Penalty: The organization has played a significant role in the global movement
to abolish the death penalty, contributing to the reduction in the number of countries that use capital
punishment.
3. Strengthening International Human Rights Standards: Amnesty International's advocacy has
contributed to the development and strengthening of international human rights standards and treaties.
4. Raising Global Awareness: Through its research, campaigns, and education programs, Amnesty
International has raised global awareness of human rights issues and mobilized millions of people to
take action.
Conclusion
Page 44 of 52
Amnesty International is a leading global NGO dedicated to protecting and promoting human rights. Through its
comprehensive programs and initiatives, the organization works to end human rights abuses, promote freedom
of expression, abolish the death penalty, and support refugees and asylum seekers. Its research, advocacy, and
education efforts have had a significant impact on advancing human rights worldwide.
Module 5: Contemporary Issues and Allied Laws

Extradition and Asylum
Principles and Procedures
Principles of Extradition
1. Principle of Reciprocity: This principle ensures mutual cooperation between states. If one state
extradites a fugitive to another, it expects the same treatment in return. Reciprocity fosters international
support and cooperation in law enforcement.
2. Principle of Double Criminality: The act for which extradition is requested must be a crime in both
the requesting and the requested states. This ensures that a person is not extradited for an act that is
not considered a crime in the country where they are currently located.
3. Principle of Double Jeopardy (Non-Bis in Idem): A person cannot be extradited if they have already
been tried and punished for the same offense in the requested state. This principle prevents multiple
prosecutions for the same crime.
4. Principle of Speciality: The requesting state can only try or punish the extradited person for the
offense for which they were extradited. This principle ensures that the extradited person is not
prosecuted for any other offenses committed before the extradition.
Procedures of Extradition
1. Request for Extradition: The process begins with a formal request from the requesting state to the
requested state. This request is usually made through diplomatic channels and must include details of
the alleged crime, evidence, and legal provisions under which the request is made.
 Judicial Review: In the requested state, the extradition request is reviewed by a judicial authority to
ensure it complies with the legal requirements and the terms of any applicable extradition treaty. The
court examines whether the evidence is sufficient to justify extradition and whether the principles of
double criminality and speciality are met.
 Arrest and Hearing: If the judicial authority finds the request valid, an arrest warrant is issued for the
fugitive. The fugitive is then brought before a court for an extradition hearing, where they can contest
the extradition on various grounds, such as the risk of political persecution or the possibility of facing
the death penalty.
 Decision and Appeal: The court decides whether to grant or deny the extradition request. If granted,
the decision can often be appealed to a higher court. If denied, the requesting state may be informed
of the reasons for the denial.
 Executive Decision: In many countries, the final decision to extradite rests with the executive branch,
such as the Secretary of State in the United States. The executive authority reviews the judicial findings
and makes the final decision, considering diplomatic and humanitarian factors.
o Surrender of the Fugitive: If the extradition is approved, the fugitive is handed over to the
authorities of the requesting state. The transfer is usually coordinated through diplomatic
channels and law enforcement agencies.
Asylum: Principles and Procedures
Principles of Asylum
1. Principle of non-Refoulement: This fundamental principle prohibits the return of refugees to a
country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom due to race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. It is enshrined in the 1951 Refugee
Convention and other international human rights instruments.
2. Right to Seek Asylum: Every individual has the right to seek asylum from persecution in other
countries. This right is recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 14) and the
1951 Refugee Convention.
3. Protection from Arbitrary Detention: Asylum seekers should not be arbitrarily detained. Detention
should only be used as a last resort and for the shortest period necessary, with respect for the
individual's rights and dignity.
4. Access to Fair and Efficient Asylum Procedures: Asylum seekers must have access to fair and
efficient procedures to determine their refugee status. This includes the right to legal assistance, the
right to be heard, and the right to appeal a negative decision.
Procedures of Asylum
1. Application for Asylum: An individual seeking asylum must submit an application to the relevant
authorities in the host country. This application should include personal information, reasons for seeking
asylum, and any supporting evidence of persecution.
2. Registration and Initial Assessment: The authorities register the asylum application and conduct an
initial assessment to determine if the application is admissible. This may involve a preliminary interview
to gather basic information about the applicant and their claim.
3. Personal Interview: A detailed personal interview is conducted to assess the credibility of the asylum
seeker's claim. The interview covers the reasons for fleeing their home country, the nature of the
persecution faced, and any supporting evidence.
4. Examination of the Claim: The authorities examine the asylum claim based on the information
provided during the interview and any additional evidence. They assess whether the applicant meets
the criteria for refugee status under international and national law.
Page 45 of 52
5. Decision: A decision is made on the asylum application. If the claim is accepted, the applicant is granted
refugee status or another form of international protection. If the claim is rejected, the applicant is
informed of the reasons and their right to appeal the decision.
6. Appeal Process: If the asylum claim is denied, the applicant has the right to appeal the decision. The
appeal process involves a review of the initial decision by an independent body or court, and the
applicant may present new evidence or arguments.
7. Integration or Return: If granted asylum, the refugee is provided with support to integrate into the
host country, including access to housing, education, healthcare, and employment. If the claim is
ultimately rejected, the individual may be required to return to their home country, provided it is safe
to do so.
Conclusion
Both extradition and asylum are critical components of international law, ensuring that individuals are either
brought to justice or protected from persecution. Extradition involves a formal process of returning fugitives to
the requesting state, governed by principles such as reciprocity, double criminality, double jeopardy, and
speciality. Asylum, on the other hand, provides protection to individuals fleeing persecution, guided by principles
like non-refoulement, the right to seek asylum, protection from arbitrary detention, and access to fair procedures.
Understanding these principles and procedures is essential for maintaining justice and human rights in the
international community.
Case Studies
Extradition Case Studies
Case Study 1: Soering v. United Kingdom (1989)
Case Facts:
 Jens Soering, a German national, was accused of committing a double murder in Virginia, USA, in 1985.
 He fled to the United Kingdom, where he was arrested.
 The United States requested his extradition to face charges, which could result in the death penalty.
Party Positions:
 United States: Requested Soering's extradition to stand trial for the murders, arguing that he should
face justice for his alleged crimes.
 United Kingdom: Initially agreed to extradite Soering but faced legal challenges based on human
rights concerns.
 Soering: Opposed extradition, arguing that he would face inhumane and degrading treatment, including
the death penalty and the "death row phenomenon" (prolonged periods of uncertainty and harsh
conditions on death row).
Ration Decidendi:
 The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) held that extraditing Soering to the United States would
violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment.
 The Court reasoned that the "death row phenomenon" constituted inhuman and degrading treatment,
and the UK could not extradite Soering without assurances that he would not face the death penalty.
Case Citation:
 Soering v. United Kingdom, Application No. 14038/88, European Court of Human Rights, Judgment of
7 July 1989.
Case Study 2: United States v. Alvarez-Machain (1992)
Case Facts:
 Humberto Alvarez-Machain, a Mexican national, was accused of participating in the kidnapping and
murder of a DEA agent in Mexico.
 The United States arranged for his abduction from Mexico to stand trial in the US.
Party Positions:
 United States: Argued that Alvarez-Machain's abduction was justified to bring him to justice for a
serious crime.
 Alvarez-Machain: Contended that his abduction violated international law and the US-Mexico
extradition treaty, and thus, the US courts had no jurisdiction over him.
Ration Decidendi:
 The US Supreme Court held that the abduction did not violate the US-Mexico extradition treaty and that
Alvarez-Machain could be tried in the United States.
 The Court reasoned that the treaty did not explicitly prohibit abductions and that the method of bringing
a defendant to trial did not affect the court's jurisdiction.
Case Citation: United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992).
Asylum Case Studies
Case Study 1: Matter of Kasinga (1996)

Case Facts:
 Fauziya Kasinga, a young woman from Togo, fled to the United States to escape female genital
mutilation (FGM) and a forced marriage.
 She applied for asylum in the US, arguing that she faced persecution based on her gender and
membership in a particular social group.
Page 46 of 52
Party Positions:
 Kasinga: Argued that she would face severe persecution, including FGM, if returned to Togo, and sought
asylum based on her fear of gender-based violence.
 US Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS): Initially denied her asylum claim, arguing that
FGM was a cultural practice and not grounds for asylum.
Ration Decidendi:
 The US Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) granted Kasinga asylum, recognizing that FGM constituted
persecution and that she was a member of a particular social group (young women of the Tchamba-
Kunsuntu tribe who opposed FGM).
 The BIA held that gender-based persecution could be a valid ground for asylum under US law.
Case Citation:
 Matter of Kasinga, 21 I&N Dec. 357 (BIA 1996).
Case Study 2: Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy (2012)
Case Facts:
 A group of Somali and Eritrean migrants attempted to reach Italy by boat but were intercepted by the
Italian authorities and returned to Libya.
 The migrants claimed that they faced persecution and inhumane treatment in Libya and sought asylum
in Italy.
Party Positions:
 Migrants: Argued that their forced return to Libya violated their rights under the European Convention
on Human Rights, including the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment (Article 3)
and the right to an effective remedy (Article 13).
 Italy: Contended that the interception and return were part of efforts to combat illegal immigration and
that the migrants had not formally applied for asylum.
Ration Decidendi:
 The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) held that Italy's actions violated the European Convention
on Human Rights.
 The Court reasoned that Italy had exposed the migrants to the risk of ill-treatment in Libya and had
failed to provide them with access to asylum procedures.
 The Court emphasized the principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits returning individuals to a
country where they face serious harm.
Case Citation: Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, Application No. 27765/09, European Court of Human Rights,
Judgment of 23 February 2012.
Nationality and Statelessness

Definition and Acquisition of Nationality
Definition of Nationality
Nationality is a legal bond between an individual and a sovereign state, establishing the person as a subject or
national of that state. This bond affords the state jurisdiction over the person and provides the person with the
protection of the state against other states. Nationality is a fundamental aspect of international law and is
essential for the exercise of various rights and duties.
Key Points:
 Legal Status: Nationality is a legal status that denotes membership in a nation or sovereign state.
 Rights and Duties: It gives rise to reciprocal rights and duties between the individual and the state.
 Protection: Nationality allows a state to protect its nationals abroad and to exercise diplomatic and
consular protection.
 International Law: The right to a nationality is recognized under international law, including Article
15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that "Everyone has the right to a
nationality" and "No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change
his nationality".
Acquisition of Nationality
Nationality can be acquired through various means, which are generally governed by the national laws of each
state. The primary modes of acquiring nationality include:
1. By Birth (Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis):
o Jus Soli (Right of the Soil): Nationality is acquired by being born within the territory of a
state. This principle is commonly used in countries like the United States and Canada.
o Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood): Nationality is acquired through descent, meaning that a
person inherits nationality from one or both parents, regardless of the place of birth. This
principle is prevalent in many European countries.
2. By Naturalization:
o Naturalization is the process by which a non-national can acquire nationality after fulfilling
certain conditions set by the state. These conditions often include a period of residence,
language proficiency, and knowledge of the country's culture and laws.
o Example: A person who has lived in a country for a specified number of years, passed a
citizenship test, and demonstrated good character may be granted nationality through
naturalization.
3. By Marriage:
Page 47 of 52
o Some countries grant nationality to individuals who marry a national of that country. The
conditions and procedures for acquiring nationality through marriage vary from state to state.
o Example: A foreign spouse may acquire nationality after a certain period of marriage and
residence in the country.
4. By Adoption:
o In some cases, a child adopted by nationals of a state may acquire the nationality of the
adoptive parents.
o Example: An adopted child may automatically acquire the nationality of the adoptive parents
if the adoption is recognized by the state.
5. By Option:
o Some states allow individuals to choose their nationality under specific circumstances, such as
when a territory is transferred from one state to another.
o Example: Residents of a territory that has been ceded to another state may be given the option
to retain their original nationality or acquire the nationality of the new state.
6. By Birth on a Ship or Aircraft:
o Nationality can also be acquired by being born on a ship or aircraft registered in a particular
state. The nationality of the vessel or aircraft may determine the nationality of the child.
o Example: A child born on a ship flying the flag of a particular country may acquire the
nationality of that country.
Conclusion
Nationality is a crucial legal status that establishes the relationship between an individual and a sovereign state,
conferring rights and duties on both parties. It can be acquired through various means, including birth,
naturalization, marriage, adoption, option, and birth on a ship or aircraft. Understanding the principles and
procedures for acquiring nationality is essential for comprehending the legal framework that governs the rights
and responsibilities of individuals and states in the international community.
Loss of Nationality
Loss of Nationality: Principles and Procedures
Definition of Loss of Nationality
Loss of nationality refers to the legal process by which an individual ceases to be a national of a country. This
can occur through various mechanisms, either voluntarily or involuntarily, and is governed by both national laws
and international legal principles. The loss of nationality can have significant implications for individuals, including
the potential for statelessness, which is the condition of not being considered a national by any state.
Principles Governing Loss of Nationality
1. Prohibition of Arbitrary Deprivation: Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states
that "No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality." This principle is echoed in various
international treaties and conventions, emphasizing that the loss of nationality must be based on clear
legal grounds and follow due process.
2. Prevention of Statelessness: International law, particularly the 1961 Convention on the Reduction
of Statelessness, aims to prevent statelessness resulting from the loss of nationality. States are
generally prohibited from depriving individuals of their nationality if it would render them stateless,
except in specific cases such as fraud or misrepresentation.
3. Right to a Fair Process:
 Individuals must be provided with a fair process, including the right to be heard, the right to appeal,
and the right to legal representation, in cases involving the loss of nationality. Decisions must be made
in accordance with the law and be subject to judicial review.
Modes of Losing Nationality
1) Voluntary Renunciation: Individuals may voluntarily renounce their nationality, often as a
prerequisite for acquiring another nationality. This process typically requires a formal application and
approval by the state. Example: A person who acquires the nationality of another country may choose
to renounce their original nationality to avoid dual citizenship.
2) Deprivation by the State: States may deprive individuals of their nationality under certain conditions,
such as:
a. Fraud or Misrepresentation: If nationality was acquired through fraudulent means or false
information.
b. Disloyalty or Treason: Engaging in activities that are seriously prejudicial to the vital
interests of the state, such as espionage or terrorism.
c. Service in a Foreign Military: Voluntary service in the armed forces of a foreign state without
permission.
3) Automatic Loss: Some states have laws that automatically result in the loss of nationality under
specific circumstances, such as:
a. Acquisition of Another Nationality: Automatically losing nationality upon acquiring another
nationality.
b. Prolonged Residence Abroad: Losing nationality after residing abroad for an extended
period without maintaining ties to the home country.
4) Loss Due to Change in Personal Status: Changes in personal status, such as marriage, divorce, or
adoption, can sometimes result in the loss of nationality. Example: A woman may lose her nationality
upon marrying a foreign national if the laws of her country stipulate such a consequence.
Case Studies
1. Janko Rottmann Case (European Court of Justice, 2010):
o Case Facts: Janko Rottmann, an Austrian national, acquired German nationality by
naturalization. Later, it was discovered that he had concealed information about criminal
Page 48 of 52
proceedings against him in Austria. Germany decided to withdraw his nationality, which would
render him stateless.
o Party Positions: Rottmann argued that the withdrawal of his nationality was disproportionate
and violated his rights. Germany argued that the naturalization was obtained fraudulently.
o Ration Decidendi: The European Court of Justice held that while states have the right to
withdraw nationality obtained by fraud, they must consider the principle of proportionality and
the consequences of statelessness. The case was referred back to the German courts to assess
these factors.
o Case Citation: Janko Rottmann v. Freistaat Bayern, Case C-135/08, European Court of
Justice, Judgment of 2 March 2010.
2. Genovese v. Malta (European Court of Human Rights, 2011):
o Case Facts: Jacob Genovese, born out of wedlock to a Maltese father and a British mother,
was denied Maltese nationality because his parents were not married at the time of his birth.
o Party Positions: Genovese argued that the denial of nationality based on his parents' marital
status was discriminatory. Malta argued that its nationality laws were consistent with its legal
framework.
o Ration Decidendi: The European Court of Human Rights held that the denial of nationality
based on the parents' marital status constituted discrimination and violated Article 14
(prohibition of discrimination) in conjunction with Article 8 (right to respect for private and
family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
o Case Citation: Genovese v. Malta, Application No. 53124/09, European Court of Human
Rights, Judgment of 11 October 2011.
Conclusion
The loss of nationality is a complex legal issue governed by both national laws and international principles. It can
occur through voluntary renunciation, deprivation by the state, automatic loss, or changes in personal status.
International law emphasizes the prohibition of arbitrary deprivation, the prevention of statelessness, and the
right to a fair process. Understanding these principles and procedures is essential for ensuring that the loss of
nationality is handled in a manner that respects human rights and legal standards.
Double Nationality
Double Nationality: Definition and Explanation
Definition of Double Nationality
Double nationality, also known as dual nationality or dual citizenship, occurs when an individual is legally
recognized as a citizen of two different countries simultaneously. This means that the person holds two sets of
legal rights and obligations under the laws of both countries.
Causes of Double Nationality
Double nationality can arise through various circumstances, including:
1. Birth:
o Jus Soli (Right of the Soil): A child born in a country that grants citizenship by birth on its
soil (e.g., the United States) may acquire that country's nationality.
o Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood): If the child's parents are nationals of another country that
grants citizenship by descent, the child may also acquire the parents' nationality.
2. Naturalization: An individual who acquires a new nationality through naturalization in another country
may retain their original nationality if the laws of the original country allow dual citizenship.
3. Marriage: Some countries grant nationality to individuals who marry their nationals. If the individual's
original country also allows dual nationality, they may hold both nationalities.
4. Adoption: A child adopted by parents of a different nationality may acquire the nationality of the
adoptive parents while retaining their original nationality.
5. Legislation: Some countries have specific laws that allow or recognize dual nationality under certain
conditions.
Legal Implications of Double Nationality
1. Rights and Obligations: Individuals with double nationality have the rights and obligations of citizens
in both countries. This includes the right to vote, work, and reside in both countries, as well as
obligations such as paying taxes and, in some cases, military service.
2. Diplomatic Protection: Dual nationals may seek diplomatic protection from either country. However,
this can be complicated if the individual is in one of the countries of their nationality, as that country
may not recognize the other nationality.
3. Conflicts of Law: Double nationality can lead to conflicts of law, particularly in areas such as taxation,
military service, and legal jurisdiction. Each country may have different legal requirements and
obligations for its nationals.
4. Travel and Mobility: Dual nationals may benefit from greater travel flexibility, as they can use the
passport of either country. However, they must comply with the entry and exit requirements of both
countries.
International Law and Double Nationality
International law does not prohibit double nationality, but it also does not require states to recognize it. The
treatment of dual nationals is primarily governed by the national laws of the respective countries. Some
international agreements and conventions address issues related to double nationality, such as:
1. The Hague Convention on Certain Questions Relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws
(1930):
o This convention seeks to reduce cases of double nationality and statelessness by establishing
rules for the acquisition and loss of nationality.
2. European Convention on Nationality (1997):
Page 49 of 52
o This convention, adopted by the Council of Europe, provides guidelines for the acquisition,
retention, and loss of nationality, including provisions related to dual nationality.
Case Example: Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala, 1955)
Case Facts:
 Friedrich Nottebohm, a German national, acquired Liechtenstein nationality through naturalization in
1939. He had long-standing business interests in Guatemala, where he had resided for many years.
 During World War II, Guatemala treated Nottebohm as an enemy alien due to his German nationality
and confiscated his property.
Party Positions:
 Liechtenstein: Claimed that Nottebohm was its national and sought to protect his interests against
Guatemala.
 Guatemala: Argued that Nottebohm's naturalization in Liechtenstein was not genuine and that he
remained a German national.
Ration Decidendi:
 The International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that Nottebohm's naturalization in Liechtenstein did not
create a genuine link between him and Liechtenstein. The Court emphasized the need for a real and
effective connection between the individual and the state claiming to protect them.
 The ICJ ruled in favor of Guatemala, stating that Liechtenstein could not exercise diplomatic protection
on behalf of Nottebohm against Guatemala.
Case Citation:
 Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala), Second Phase, Judgment of April 6, 1955, ICJ Reports
1955, p. 4.
Conclusion
Double nationality, or dual citizenship, occurs when an individual is recognized as a citizen of two countries
simultaneously. It can arise through birth, naturalization, marriage, adoption, or specific legislation. While double
nationality offers certain benefits, it also presents legal complexities and potential conflicts of law. International
law does not prohibit double nationality but provides guidelines for its management. Understanding the principles
and implications of double nationality is essential for navigating the rights and obligations associated with holding
multiple nationalities.
Diplomatic and Consular Relations

Diplomatic Envoys and Consuls
Diplomatic Envoys Diplomatic envoys refer to representatives sent by one state to another state to conduct
diplomatic relations. They are the official representatives of a state and play a crucial role in international
relations. The main functions of diplomatic envoys include:
1. Representing the sending state and protecting its interests in the receiving state.
2. Negotiating with the government of the receiving state on various matters.
3. Reporting back to the sending state about the political, economic and social conditions in the receiving
state.
4. Promoting friendly relations and cooperation between the sending and receiving states.
5. Providing consular assistance to the citizens of the sending state who are present in the receiving state.
Diplomatic envoys are classified into different categories based on their rank and status:
1. Ambassadors - They are the highest-ranking diplomatic representatives and are accredited to the head
of state of the receiving country.
2. Ministers - They are diplomatic representatives of a lower rank than ambassadors, accredited to the
head of government of the receiving state.
3. Chargés d'Affaires - They are diplomatic representatives who head the mission in the absence of the
ambassador or minister.
4. Counselors, Secretaries, Attachés - They are lower-ranking diplomatic staff who assist the head of the
mission.
Diplomatic envoys enjoy certain privileges and immunities under international law to enable them to effectively
carry out their functions. These include:
1. Inviolability of their person, residence, and official premises.
2. Immunity from the criminal, civil and administrative jurisdiction of the receiving state.
3. Exemption from taxation on their salaries and emoluments.
4. Freedom of movement within the receiving state.
5. Freedom of communication with their home government.
Consuls Consuls are official representatives of a state posted in foreign countries, but they have a different role
and status compared to diplomatic envoys. The main functions of consuls include:
1. Protecting the interests of the sending state and its citizens in the receiving state.
2. Facilitating commercial and economic relations between the sending and receiving states.
3. Issuing passports, visas and other documents to the citizens of the sending state.
4. Providing assistance and welfare services to the citizens of the sending state in the receiving state.
5. Gathering and reporting information about the economic, commercial and political conditions in the
receiving state.
Consuls are classified into different categories based on their rank:
1. Consul General - The highest-ranking consul, who heads the consular post.
2. Consul - A consul of the regular rank.
3. Vice-Consul - A consul of a lower rank.
Page 50 of 52
4. Consular Agent - The lowest-ranking consular officer.

Consuls enjoy certain privileges and immunities, but these are more limited compared to diplomatic envoys.
They are generally immune from the criminal jurisdiction of the receiving state for acts performed in their official
capacity. They also enjoy some exemptions from taxation and customs duties. In summary, diplomatic envoys
are the official representatives of a state responsible for conducting diplomatic relations, while consuls are officials
posted abroad to protect the interests of the sending state and its citizens in the receiving state. Both play
important roles in international relations, but with distinct functions and privileges.
Privileges and Immunities
Here is an overview of the privileges and immunities of diplomatic envoys and consuls under international law:
Diplomatic Envoys Diplomatic envoys enjoy certain privileges and immunities under international law to enable
them to effectively carry out their functions. These include:
1. Inviolability of their person, residence, and official premises. Diplomatic agents cannot be arrested or
detained, and their premises cannot be entered or searched.
2. Immunity from the criminal, civil and administrative jurisdiction of the receiving state. Diplomatic agents
cannot be prosecuted in the courts of the receiving state for any official or private acts.
3. Exemption from taxation on their salaries and emoluments. Diplomatic agents are exempt from all dues
and taxes, personal or real, national, regional or municipal.
4. Freedom of movement within the receiving state. Diplomatic agents have the freedom to move and
travel freely within the territory of the receiving state.
5. Freedom of communication with their home government. Diplomatic agents have the right to
communicate freely with their government, using various means of communication, including diplomatic
bags which are inviolable.
Consuls Consuls enjoy more limited privileges and immunities compared to diplomatic envoys. The main
privileges and immunities of consuls include:
1. Immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of the receiving state for acts performed in their official capacity.
2. Exemption from taxation on their salaries and emoluments received as payment for their consular
services.
3. Exemption from customs duties and inspection, except in certain cases, on articles intended for their
personal use or for the use of the consular post.
4. Inviolability of the consular archives and documents.
5. The right to communicate with their home government and the nationals of the sending state.
The privileges and immunities of consuls are more limited in scope compared to diplomatic agents, as consuls
are primarily engaged in consular functions like protecting the interests of the sending state and its nationals in
the receiving state. The receiving state has more control and jurisdiction over consular officers compared to
diplomatic agents. Overall, the privileges and immunities of diplomatic envoys and consuls are crucial to enable
them to effectively carry out their functions and maintain cordial international relations between states. They
help ensure the independence and autonomy of diplomatic and consular missions.
International Health Regulations
World Health Organization (WHO)
The World Health Organization (WHO) The World Health Organization (WHO) is the United Nations agency
responsible for international public health. It was established in 1948 and is headquartered in Geneva,
Switzerland. The key functions and roles of the WHO include:
1. Providing leadership on global health matters, shaping the health research agenda, and setting norms
and standards.
2. Articulating evidence-based policy options, providing technical expertise and monitoring the health
situation globally.
3. Coordinating the international response to public health emergencies, such as disease outbreaks,
natural disasters, and humanitarian crises.
4. Promoting improved access to essential medicines and vaccines, especially for the world's poorest
populations.
5. Monitoring and assessing global health trends and addressing social, economic, environmental, and
other determinants of health.
6. Setting the global health agenda and promoting the development of comprehensive public health
policies and programs.
The WHO is governed by 194 member states through the World Health Assembly, which is the decision-making
body of the organization. The Assembly is attended by delegations from all member states and determines the
policies of the organization. The International Health Regulations (IHR) The International Health Regulations
(IHR) are an international legal instrument that is binding on 196 countries across the globe, including all the
member states of the WHO. The IHR were first adopted in 1969 and have been revised over time, with the most
recent version coming into effect in 2005. The key features and objectives of the IHR include:
1. Providing a global legal framework for coordinating the management of events that may constitute a
public health emergency of international concern.
2. Requiring countries to develop certain minimum core public health capacities, including the ability to
detect, assess, notify and respond to public health emergencies.
3. Establishing rights and obligations for countries to report certain disease outbreaks and public health
events to the WHO.
4. Outlining procedures for the WHO to determine if an event constitutes a "public health emergency of
international concern" and to recommend appropriate response measures.
5. Preventing unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade while ensuring a coordinated
international response to public health risks and emergencies.
Page 51 of 52
The IHR are intended to help the international community prevent and respond to acute public health risks that
have the potential to cross borders and threaten people worldwide. They provide an overarching legal framework
that guides countries in developing and strengthening their public health security and preparedness. In summary,
the WHO is the leading global health agency that sets norms, standards and policies, while the IHR provide the
legal framework for countries to coordinate their efforts in preventing, detecting and responding to public health
emergencies of international concern. Together, they play a crucial role in protecting global health security.
Global Health Law Consortium
The Global Health Law Consortium (GHLC) is an international network of academic institutions, research centers,
and individual experts focused on advancing global health law and governance. The key aspects of the GHLC
are: Purpose and Objectives:
 Promote research, education, and capacity-building in global health law and governance
 Facilitate collaboration and knowledge-sharing among experts and institutions working in this field
 Provide technical assistance and policy advice to governments, international organizations, and other
stakeholders
 Contribute to the development of global health law frameworks and norms
Key Activities:
 Conducting interdisciplinary research on critical global health law issues
 Organizing conferences, workshops, and training programs
 Publishing scholarly articles, policy briefs, and other knowledge products
 Providing technical support and policy advice to national governments and international organizations
 Building the capacity of early-career scholars and practitioners in global health law
Membership and Structure:
 The GHLC is a consortium of leading academic institutions, research centers, and individual experts
from around the world
 It is hosted by the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law at Georgetown University
 The GHLC has a Steering Committee that provides strategic direction and oversight
Some Key Focus Areas of the GHLC:
 International health regulations and pandemic preparedness
 Access to medicines and pharmaceutical innovation
 Global governance of non-communicable diseases
 Human rights and ethical dimensions of global health
 Climate change and planetary health
Overall, the GHLC plays a crucial role in advancing the field of global health law by fostering collaboration,
generating evidence, and informing policy and practice in this critical domain of international cooperation and
governance.
Communicable Diseases and International Health Regulations (IHR)
Communicable Diseases Communicable diseases, also known as infectious diseases, are illnesses that can be
transmitted from one person to another. They are caused by pathogenic microorganisms such as bacteria,
viruses, parasites or fungi. Some examples of communicable diseases include:
 Influenza (flu)
 COVID-19
 HIV/AIDS
 Tuberculosis
 Malaria
 Hepatitis
 Measles
 Cholera
 Ebola
Communicable diseases can spread through various modes of transmission, such as:
1. Direct contact: Through physical touch, bodily fluids, or close personal contact.
2. Indirect contact: Via contaminated surfaces, objects, food, or water.
3. Airborne transmission: Via tiny respiratory droplets or aerosols.
4. Vector-borne transmission: Through vectors like mosquitoes, ticks, or rodents.
The spread of communicable diseases can have significant public health, economic and social impacts. Outbreaks
and epidemics of such diseases can overwhelm healthcare systems, disrupt economies, and lead to loss of life.
Controlling the spread of communicable diseases is a major global health priority. International Health
Regulations (IHR) The International Health Regulations (IHR) are an international legal instrument that is binding
on 196 countries across the globe, including all the member states of the World Health Organization (WHO). The
IHR were first adopted in 1969 and have been revised over time, with the most recent version coming into effect
in 2005. The key features and objectives of the IHR include:
1. Providing a global legal framework for coordinating the management of events that may constitute a
public health emergency of international concern.
2. Requiring countries to develop certain minimum core public health capacities, including the ability to
detect, assess, notify and respond to public health emergencies.
Page 52 of 52
3. Establishing rights and obligations for countries to report certain disease outbreaks and public health
events to the WHO.
4. Outlining procedures for the WHO to determine if an event constitutes a "public health emergency of
international concern" and to recommend appropriate response measures.
5. Preventing unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade while ensuring a coordinated
international response to public health risks and emergencies.
The IHR are intended to help the international community prevent and respond to acute public health risks that
have the potential to cross borders and threaten people worldwide. They provide an overarching legal framework
that guides countries in developing and strengthening their public health security and preparedness. The COVID-
19 pandemic has highlighted the critical importance of the IHR in coordinating a global response to communicable
disease outbreaks. The IHR have been instrumental in guiding countries' actions and the WHO's role in
monitoring, assessing and responding to the pandemic. In summary, communicable diseases pose significant
global health challenges, and the International Health Regulations provide the legal framework for countries to
collaborate in preventing, detecting and responding to public health emergencies of international concern,
including outbreaks of communicable diseases.
Disclaimer
Hemant Patil, GLC Mumbai Batch of 2025, freely shares these notes with all law students, regardless of their
institution or location, without any discrimination. Redistribution of these notes is encouraged to benefit
everyone. The author does not guarantee the completeness, accuracy, reliability, or suitability of the information
provided. Any reliance on this information is at your own risk. The author is not liable for any loss or damage,
including indirect or consequential loss, or any loss of data or profits arising from the use of this document. The
author reserves the right to change, add, or remove any information in this document at any time without notice.
These notes continue to keep improving, and it is always advisable to check for the latest available version. For
the latest version, please request it by providing your full name, contact details, and institution to
hbpatil@gmail.com.

Pil - 30sep24

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pil - 30sep24

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pil - 30sep24

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ABSTRACT

Short summary notes in reference to the previous year

Hemant Patil. Digital Rights Law

Validity and Enforcement ................................................................................................................31

Question Topic Marks Freq Notes

Territorial Sea and High Seas 12 or Medium Page 19

Module 1: Introduction to International Law

Module 2: Statehood and Recognition

Module 3: Law of the Sea and State Responsibility

Rights and Responsibilities:

Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries

Concept of "Common Heritage of Mankind"

 Satisfaction: Acknowledgment of the breach, expression of regret, formal apology,

Module 4: Treaties and International Organizations

Rights and Duties of Parties

 Implementation: It implements the decisions of the UN and manages its day-to-day

 Voting: Decisions on procedural matters require nine affirmative votes. Decisions on

International Specialized Agencies and NGOs

5. Outreach and Cooperation:

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

Objectives and Mission

Module 5: Contemporary Issues and Allied Laws

Asylum Case Studies

Case Study 1: Matter of Kasinga (1996)

Nationality and Statelessness

Diplomatic and Consular Relations

4. Consular Agent - The lowest-ranking consular officer.

You might also like