Louisiana State University

LSU Scholarly Repository

LSU Major Papers Graduate School

2003

The role of Turkish percussion in the history and development of

the orchestral percussion section
D. Doran Bugg
Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_majorpapers

Part of the Music Commons

Recommended Citation
Bugg, D. Doran, "The role of Turkish percussion in the history and development of the orchestral
percussion section" (2003). LSU Major Papers. 27.
https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_majorpapers/27

This Major Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Scholarly Repository. It
has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Major Papers by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Scholarly
Repository. For more information, please contact gradetd@lsu.edu.
 THE ROLE OF TURKISH PERCUSSION IN THE HISTORY AND
DEVELOPMENT OF THE ORCHESTRAL PERCUSSION SECTION

A Monograph

Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the

Louisiana State University and
Agricultural and Mechanical College
in partial fulfillment of the
Requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Musical Arts

In
The School of Music
The College of Music and Dramatic Arts

by
D. Doran Bugg
B.M.E., University of Mississippi, 1988
M.M., Baylor University, 1990
December 2003
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the many persons who so

generously contributed their time, knowledge, and support during the preparation and

completion of this monograph. Special thanks are extended to Professor James Byo,

Professor Larry Campbell, Professor Michael Kingan, Professor Patricia Lawrence, Professor

John Raush, Professor Joseph Skillen, and Professor James West, members of my doctoral

committee.

I am forever indebted to my parents for encouraging my musical and educational

pursuits. Special appreciation is given to Dr. B. David Brooks and the members of Calvary

Baptist Church in Alexandria, Louisiana. Without their understanding and support, the

completion of this monograph would have never been realized.

I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Dr. John Raush for his endless

patience, support, and guidance during my graduate studies at Louisiana State University, for

continuing to chair my doctoral committee and direct the preparation of this monograph even

after his retirement.

Lastly, I wish to thank Benjamin, Libby, and most importantly, Kristie, for their years

of encouragement and unconditional support. This monograph is a reality because of their

sacrifices. I dedicate this monograph to them.

ii
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv

LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v

ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii

CHAPTER
1. DESCRIPTION AND INTRODUCTION OF THE STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2. PERCUSSION INSTRUMENTS OF TURKISH MUSIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

3. ORIGINAL ENTRY OF TURKISH PERCUSSION INSTRUMENTS

INTO THE ORCHESTRA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

4. SUBSEQUENT HISTORY AND USE OF TURKISH PERCUSSION

INSTRUMENTS IN THE ORCHESTRA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

APPENDIX: CHRONOLOGICAL LISTING OF MUSICAL COMPOSITIONS

STUDIED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 79

VITA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

iii
 LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1. Definition of Terms ……………………………………………………………………..... 3

iv
 LIST OF FIGURES

1. Turkish bass drum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

2. Long drum with beaters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

3. Cymbals similar to those used in the Turkish percussion section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

4. Sistrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

5. Triangle similar to one used in the Turkish percussion section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

6. Turkish Crescent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

7. Turkish Tambourine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

8. La Scala seating arrangement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

9. San Carlo seating arrangement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

10. Paris seating arrangement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

11. Iphigenia en Tauride by Gluck (cymbals) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

12. Iphigenia en Tauride by Gluck (triangle) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

13. Die Entführung as dem Serial by Mozart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

14. Symphony No. 100, “Military,” (movement II) by Haydn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

15. “Military” Symphony No. 100 (movement IV) by Haydn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

16. Die Ruinen von Athens by Beethoven . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

17. Symphony No. 9 (IV) by Beethoven . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

18. Overture to L’Italiana in Algeri by Rossini . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

19. Overture to Il barbiere di Siviglia by Rossini . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40

20. Overture to Preciosa by Weber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

21. Modern orchestral bass drum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

22. Symphonie Fantastique by Berlioz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

v
23. Grande Messe des Morts by Berlioz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

24. L’Apprenti-Sorcier by Dukas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

25. Le sacre du printemps by Stravinsky (example 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

26. Le sacre du printemps by Stravinsky (example 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

27. Antique Cymbals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

28. Romeo et Juliette by Berlioz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

29. La Mer by Debussy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

30. Symphony No. 1 by Schumann . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

31. Piano Concerto No. 1 by Liszt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

32. Scheherazade by Rimsky-Korsakov (triangle) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61

33. Symphony No. 4 (III) by Brahms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

34. Scheherazade by Rimsky-Korsakov (tambourine) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

35. Firebird by Stravinsky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

36. Petrouchka by Stravinsky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

vi
 ABSTRACT

The fascination of eighteenth century Western composers with the Eastern percussion

instruments of the Turks was the impetus behind the initial use of percussion instruments in

the orchestra. Consequently, the era beginning in the late eighteenth-century when percussion

instruments were first included deserves reexamination.

The objectives of this monograph include the examination of the manner in which

composers first utilized Turkish percussion (excluding kettledrums) in the orchestra. This

study then investigates the subsequent history of these instruments and manner in which

composers utilized them, leading to their recognition as musical instruments in their own

right. The findings of this study provide a resource for both performers and conductors who

seek to recreate authentic performances of music from that era.

Research methods included the examination of existing primary and largely secondary

sources that included musical scores and newspaper articles of the period. The organology of

these instruments and their performance practices were studied, aided by iconographical

evidence of the instruments and their performance.

Salient findings of this study were that the percussion instruments first incorporated

into the late eighteenth-century and early nineteenth-century orchestra consisted of the bass

drum, cymbals, and triangle. The Turkish crescent and tambourine was also occasionally

added. Some of these instruments entered the orchestra with a specialized performance

practice. The bass drum, for example, was struck by one hand on the side of the drum’s head

with a wooden beater; the other hand struck the opposite head with a switch most often made

of twigs, called a ruthe. Orchestral composers such as Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven were

among the first to incorporate Turkish percussion instruments, using them as a homogeneous

vii
group that produced a characteristic tone color through the simultaneous playing of each

instrument, reminiscent of their use in military bands. Each Turkish percussion instrument

experienced changes in design that resulted in a more independent use of each instrument.

Nineteenth-century composers such as Berlioz wrote parts for percussion and timpani integral

to the harmonic and textural structure of their orchestral compositions. Percussion

instruments have since become a frequent focal point of orchestration.

viii
 CHAPTER 1

DESCRIPTION AND INTRODUCTION OF THE STUDY

Importance of the Study

Of all the musical instruments in the standard symphony orchestra, it is

those of the percussion section which, by comparison with the others, have
been constantly neglected and mistreated by composers and arrangers alike.1

This study is intended to assist the symphonic percussionist and the conductor in

understanding the history and use of percussion instruments, which led to their entry into the

late eighteenth-century and early nineteenth-century orchestra. The result offers a concise

source of information concerning not only a description of Turkish percussion instruments

and their performance, but also the rise and development of these instruments in the orchestra

which provided the foundation for the modern expanded orchestral percussion section.

Objectives of the Study

There are three fundamental objectives of this monograph:

1. To investigate the manner through which composers first utilized Turkish percussion
(excluding kettledrums) in the orchestra.

2. To examine the subsequent history of these instruments and the manner in which
composers utilized them, leading to their recognition as musical instruments in their
own right.

3. To provide a resource for both performers and conductors who seek to recreate
authentic performances of music from that era.

These objectives were realized through the following chapter outline:

Chapter I. Description and Introduction of the Study

1
Edgar B. Gangware, The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration, diss. (Evanston:
Northwestern University, 1962), ii.

1
 Chapter II. Percussion Instruments of Turkish Music

Chapter III. Original Entry of Turkish Percussion Instruments Into the Orchestra

Chapter IV. The Subsequent History and Use of Turkish Percussion Instruments
In the Orchestra
Chapter V. Summary and Conclusions

Procedures of the Study

Iconographical evidence and available books and articles were used to briefly discuss

the origin of each Turkish percussion instrument first employed by European composers.

Brief references to other percussion instruments cited in selected musical examples were also

included. Musical scores and newspaper articles of the period were combined with other

available sources to examine aspects surrounding the original entry of Turkish percussion into

the late eighteenth-century and early nineteenth-century orchestra.

Historical writings and treatises concerning orchestral instrumentation, orchestration,

and the evolution of percussion practice and execution were studied. Selected musical scores

illustrated the inclusion of Turkish percussion instruments by composers in the orchestra.

Limitations of the Study

This document examined the original entry of Turkish percussion and the subsequent

history of percussion instruments, specific to the orchestra. The evolution of the use of

percussion in the military band or modern wind ensemble is outside the scope of this study.

While the existence and implementation of percussion instruments additional to the scope of

this study is acknowledged, percussion instruments beyond those instruments traceable to the

original entry of percussion instruments into the eighteenth-century European orchestra such

as melodic percussion instruments, gongs, Latin American instruments, and various drums are

2
not addressed in the monograph because their inclusion in the orchestra succeeds that of the

Turkish percussion instruments.

This monograph cites known orchestral repertoire in which Turkish percussion, or

stylistic features defining so-called “Turkish Music,” is a distinct compositional element.

“Turkish Music” will, for the purposes of this study, be defined by the use of Turkish

percussion in military bands which led to the original inclusion of percussion instruments

(excluding kettledrums) in the late eighteenth century and early nineteenth century orchestra.

The purpose of this study is not to examine all possible instances where Turkish percussion

instruments are found in an orchestral work, but to select available works that contribute

toward the acceptance of the percussion section in the orchestra. Additional musical

examples were selected to represent the development of these instruments following their

original entry, which has led to their function as independent members of the modern

orchestral percussion section.

TABLE 1

DEFINITION OF TERMS

This list illustrates the names of Turkish percussion instruments translated in English,

German, Italian, and French. Related instruments and implements are also included.2

English German Italian French

Bass Drum die Grosse Trommel la grancassa la grosse caisse

or gran cassa

Cymbals (pair or à 2) die (türkischen) Becken i piatti (a due) les cymbales

2
Karl Peinkofer and Fritz Tannigel, Handbook of Percussion Instruments, trans. Kurt and Else Stone (New
York: Schott Press of Belwin Mills Publishing Corp., 1969), 10-16.

3
Finger Cymbals die Fingerzimbeln i crotali les crotales
(Antique Cymbals) die Krotalen i cimbalini
(Crotales)

Kettledrums die Pauken i timpani les timbales

(Timpani) die Kesselpauken

Stick Schlagel Stock Bacchetta Baguette –

Mailloche
Strike (beat) Schlage Colpite Frappez (Blouser)

Switch Rute (Ruthe) Verga Verge

Tabor Tambourin Tamburo di -- Tambourin de –

Provenza Provence
die provenzalische – il tamburo -- le tambourin
Trommel provenzale (provencal)

Tambourine die Schellentrommel il tamburello le tambour—

(basco) de basque
das Tamburin il tamburino
il tamburo basco

Triangle der Triangel il triangolo le triangle

Turkish Crescent der Schellenbaum l’albero di sonagli le chapeau --

(Belltree) la barra di -- chinois
(Jingling Johnny) sospensione –

All other foreign terms encountered in this monograph were defined in the context of their

related use. Standard definitions of research terms were also used unless otherwise indicated

in the text.

During the first half of the eighteenth century, within their illustrious corps of

Janissaries, a noticeably exotic group of wind and percussion instruments used by the Turks

became the object of considerable European interest. This fascination with Eastern musical

practices was not only the impetus behind the eventual use of these percussion instruments by

Western composers, but was arguably the origin of the percussion section in the modern

orchestra.

4
 Before the influence of Turkish instruments, the kettledrum was the only member of

the percussion family with Eastern roots to have gained acceptance in the orchestra.

However, European interest in so-called Turkish Music (mehter3), significantly characterized

by its heavy emphasis on percussion, soon progressed beyond mere admiration, resulting in a

flood of new European compositions alla turka.4

The Janissary Corps was created in 1326 as the official royal guard of the Ottoman

Turk rulers. Spanning a five hundred year existence, the Janissaries were greatly feared and

respected. Throughout the centuries, growing musical interest within the Corps manifested

itself in a group of instrumental performers specifically trained to assist this select group of

fighters. Only the absolute cessation of the Corps could indicate that the colors were either

lost or furled in retreat, signifying the battle was over.5 Thus, the Janissary Band was born

with the objective of developing martial music to its most effective state. This music attracted

the attention of Europe’s armies, and by the second decade of the eighteenth century, August

II of Poland had acquired a complete Turkish military band – a gift from the Sultan of

Turkey.6

Not to be outdone by her southern neighbor, the Empress Anne of Prussia sent for a

comparable band from Constantinople in 1725. This band played treble and tenor shawms

3
The bands of the janissaries were called mehter, a term used also for some Ottoman state officials and thus
taken to mean not just the bands but the individual musicians as well. The New Grove Dictionary of Music and
Musicians, ed. Stanley Sadie, 3nd ed., s.v. “Janissary music,” by Michael Pirker.
4
Alla Turka is an Italian term, referring to the style of music played by eighteenth-century Turkish military
bands. Harper’s Dictionary of Music (New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1972), 386.
5
Henry George Farmer, Handel’s Kettledrums And Other Papers On Military Music. (London: Robert
Stockwell LTD., 1965), 41.
6
James L. Moore, “How Turkish Janizary Band Music Started Our Modern Percussion Section,” Percussive
Notes (1965): 7.

5
(zurna), fifes (ney), a pair of kettledrums (kos), bass drums (daval - carried at the player’s

waist, heads to the side and struck with a double-headed stick on one head and a switch on the

other), two pairs of small cymbals (zil), one large pair of cymbals, and a triangle (large, most

likely with metal rings strung on the base which jingled when the instrument was struck). As

Turkish music spread westward, Austria and France joined the craze. By century’s end,

England too had included bass drums, cymbals, and tambourines in the Royal Artillery Band.

Turkish crescents were added to these bands by 1805.7

While the Turkish influence was first felt in the military band, it soon found its way

into the orchestral scores of Western composers when Turkish instruments caught their eyes

and ears in the mid 1760s. As one historian said, “It was . . . this so-called ‘Turkish Music’

that opened the eyes of the great composers, beginning with Mozart and Beethoven, to the

possibilities of a new tone color and fresh rhythmic devices in the wider realm of orchestra

music.”8 In the narrowest sense, the Europeans considered Turkish percussion as the

combination of bass drum, cymbals, and triangle. This was evidenced in the significant early

works noted for the incorporation of Turkish influences. The music played by these

instruments, before their inclusion in the orchestra, was not written down. Even after the

entry of Turkish percussion instruments into the orchestral ensemble, not every work

composed alla turka had printed percussion parts provided by the composer. Consequently,

most information about Turkish music concerns the instruments on which it was played.9

7
Harrison Powley, Encyclopedia of Percussion, s.v. “Janissary Music” ed. John H. Beck.
8
Ibid., 46.
9
The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, ed. Stanley Sadie, 3rd ed., s.v. “Janissary music,” by
Michael Pirker.

6
 The trend to incorporate percussion instruments as a section in the orchestra was slow

to develop. The nineteenth century and the first quarter of the twentieth century, however,

represent a key period of maturation and modification necessary for each of the Turkish

percussion instruments. These refinements inspired composers to realize new potential for

their orchestral use, weaning these instruments from their past standard usage and introducing

each to a variable degree of independence.10

With the twentieth century has come the incorporation of many varied percussion

instruments into the works of numerous orchestral composers. The status of percussion in

today’s orchestra follows years of only modest acceptance in the orchestra. Reexamining the

age of the inclusion of percussion instruments in the late eighteenth-century and early

nineteenth-century European orchestra will benefit those who seek to recreate authentic

performances of music from that era. It may also reshape our views of the subsequent

evolution of the modern orchestral percussion section.

10
Gangware, The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration, 255-56.

7
 CHAPTER 2

PERCUSSION INSTRUMENTS OF TURKISH MUSIC

The percussion instruments used in Turkish music included the bass drum, cymbals,

triangle, Turkish crescent, kettledrums, and, on occasion, the tambourine. Each of these

instruments, except for the Turkish crescent, differed somewhat from the modern orchestral

version. This document will examine the entry of the bass drum, cymbals, triangle, Turkish

crescent, and tambourine into the orchestra. Kettledrums will not be discussed in this study.

The bass drum dates back to the Sumerians as documented in artwork from the latter

half of the third millennium, B.C. which depicted an enormous drum five or six feet in

diameter. An early sixteenth-century Venetian painting by Carpaccio shows a Turkish

musician playing a drum almost exactly the same shape and size as the modern military bass

drum. With the introduction of Turkish Janissary music into the courts of Europe, a large

drum requiring a new playing technique entered Western music. This Turkish drum, known

as the daval, became an important instrument in Janissary music by the middle of the

eighteenth century.1

1
Gangware, The History and use of Percussion Instruments n Orchestration, 7; Geary H. Larrick, “Percussion:
Its Status from Antiquity to the Modern Era,” Percussive Notes (1968): 44; Peinkofer and Tannigel, Handbook
of Percussion Instruments, 94; The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., (2001), s.v. “Bass
Drum,“ and “Janissary Music.”

8
Figure 1. Turkish bass drum. Reprinted from James Blades, Percussion Instruments and
Their History (London: Faber and Faber Limited, 1984), 209

Figure 1 represents the Turkish bass drum as it appeared during the sixteenth century.

As it was known until the nineteenth century, this bass drum was most similar to the drum

used by the British and French military armies. Many sources note the dimensions of the bass

drum, or “long drum” as it had been termed by the English, to be greater in depth from head

9
to head than it was in diameter. Unlike the modern orchestral bass drum with its large heads

and relatively thin, cylindrical body, other accounts record the dimensions of the Turkish bass

drum to be generally equal in ratio of diameter to depth. With heads on both sides of the

drum, the skin heads were tuned by rope-tension. The rope or cord passed through holes on

the counter-hoops and across the shell in a “V” formation, and was tightened by leather

braces. This type of tuning system produced a powerfully low sound of indefinite pitch.

During its military use, the bass drum was often carried on the back of one person and

played by someone else marching behind. In other cases, as seen in Figure 2, two different

types of beaters were used.

Figure 2. Long drum with beaters. Reprinted from James Blades, Percussion Instruments and
Their History (London: Faber and Faber Limited, 1984), 128

One hand struck the head with a wooden stick and the other struck the opposite head with a

switch most often made of twigs, called a ruthe.2 The drummer would play the beat to aid in

proper marching with the stick, and then play a supplemental measured pulse with the switch

2
Other names for the ruthe include switch, rute (German), verga (Italian), or verge (French).

10
that was often doubled on the triangle. Prior to the bass drum’s entry into the orchestra, its

playing position often involved the placing of sling ropes over one’s head that allowed the

drum to rest comfortably over the abdomen. A wooden beater sounded the accented beats and

the ruthe sounded the unaccented beats on the other head, consistent with the original Turkish

playing technique. When parts were extant, this “stick and switch” method of play was

indicated through the use of down and up stems, corresponding respectively to the beater

(down stems) and switch (up stems).3 Musical examples notating this performance practice

are included in Chapter 3.

As mentioned in the previous paragraph, the style of play required of the Turkish bass

drummer was unique. In addition to the traditional beater usually played by the right hand, he

would supplement this sound with the ruthe in his left hand. The beater and the ruthe were

customarily assigned to separate heads of the drum. The player could strike the ruthe directly

onto the drum’s head, or strike both the head and the rim of the drum simultaneously. The

latter style of play created a rim shot effect that produced a high pitched “tock” sound which

contrasted the low “boom” of the wooden beater.4 The location on the bass drum struck by

the ruthe was determined by the timbre of sound desired. The ruthe was most likely made of

bound bundles of switches, birch branches, or strips of split bamboo, as determined by the

strength of sound desired.5

3
Michael Bayard, “Timpani Clinic: The Neo-Janizaries,” Percussive Notes (1987): 37; Moore, “How Turkish
Janizary Band Music Started Our Modern Percussion Section,” 10; Nicholas Ormrod, “The Ruthe in Authentic
Performance,” Percussive Notes (1995): 65; The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., (2001),
s.v. “Bass Drum.”
4
Michael Rosen, “Terms Used in Percussion: Die Rute,” Percussive Notes (1979): 49.
5
Peinkofer and Tannigel, Handbook of Percussion Instruments, 138.

11
 The cymbal received its name from its shape. Karl Peinkofer takes thorough notice of

this in Handbook of Percussion Instruments by translating the word “cymbal” from the Greek

kýmbre, meaning cup or bowl. The German name Becken is synonymous with the German

word for a shallow bowl, as is the Italian piatti with the word for (dinner) plate.

Cymbals are of ancient origin as evidenced by two types of cymbals referred to in the

fifth verse of Psalm 150 in the Old Testament of The Holy Bible. “Praise Him upon the loud

cymbals (mesiltayim); praise Him upon the high-sounding cymbals (selselim).”6 Making

their way from the Middle East via the Roman Empire, cymbals have been found in the early

civilizations of Egypt, Greece, Rome, India, Indonesia, and China. Their size and forms

varied from region to region, and include the small finger-type (also known today as antique

cymbals or crotales), the inverted-funnel type, and the flatter soup-plate type. The largest and

loudest cymbals were used historically as designations of war. Smaller cymbals were used in

the temples of worship and as ornaments of adornment. Each of these types of cymbals is

found in European history, but the inverted-funnel type of cymbal does not survive in the

present-day percussion family.7

Cymbals (zil) were heavily used in the mehter beginning as early as the fourteenth

century. The modern history of cymbals began in the early seventeenth century when an

alchemist of Constantinople named Avedis discovered a still secret process to produce

cymbals with extraordinarily clear and powerful sound. He was given the name “Zildjian,”

6
Ps. 105:5 KJB (King James Bible); The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., (2001), s.v.
“Cymbals.”
7
Gangware, The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration, 113-116.

12
the Turkish word for “cymbalsmith.” These became the cymbals used in the Turkish bands

that spread throughout Europe and eventually captured the interest of European composers.8

Cymbals were made of copper, bronze, brass, and occasionally silver. As seen in

Figure 2 and Figure 3, eighteenth-century European cymbals were generally smaller and

denser than cymbals used today, though larger and thinner than those used in the Middle

Ages.9 In the Classical era, cymbals were between 15 inches and 20 inches in diameter.10

The center of the cymbal has a drilled circular hole through which a leather loop is drawn

allowing each hand to hold one cymbal, and the two to be struck together. The center of the

Turkish cymbal, known as either the bell or the cup, was noticeably raised and proportionally

large in comparison to modern models. The earliest Turkish cymbals sounded a distinct

attack with little sustain, perhaps because of the repeated frenzy of crashes customary in

music composed alla turka.11

8
Gangware, The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration, 20-21, 113; Ben F. Miller, “A
Brief History of the Cymbal from Antiquity to the Renaissance,” Percussive Notes (1974): 46, 50; Walter C.
Schneider, “Percussion Instruments of the Middle Ages,” Percussive Notes (1978): 111; The New Grove
Dictionary of Music and Musicians (2001), s.v. “Cymbals.“
9
Medieval cymbals appear to be quite thick, approximately 5 to 10 inches in size.
10
Peinkofer and Tannigel, Handbook of Percussion Instruments, 120.
11
Bayard, “Timpani Clinic: The Neo-Janizaries,” 36; David Levine, “Percussion Instruments and Performance
Practices in Beethoven’s Music,” Percussive Notes (1977): 1.

13
Figure 3. Cymbals similar to those used in the Turkish percussion section. Reprinted from
James Blades and Jeremy Montagu, Early Percussion Instruments From the Middle Ages to
the Baroque (London: Oxford University Press, 1976), 16

Styles of performance were much the same for eighteenth-century cymbals as they are

today. They could be held vertically and played by striking one against the other, or held with

one plate resting above the lower hand and the other plate hanging below the upper hand,

suggesting a horizontal striking motion. There was little asked of the Turkish cymbal player

with regard to sonority of sound, since the aim of the first composers to write for Turkish

percussion was to simply transplant the marching “battery” sound of the military band into the

orchestral composition. Cymbal crashes were scored to produce a consistent, full-bodied

burst of color, and were used in combination with the other Turkish percussion instruments.

The initial borrowing of Turkish percussion players for the orchestra from military

bands may help to explain historical evidence that the designation for bass drum in some

orchestrations implied the simultaneous use of cymbals. Some researchers maintain this was

standard practice unless either the bass drum or cymbals was scored to play alone. This

14
opinion will be further discussed in Chapter 3. When Turkish percussion was first added to

the opera orchestra, parts for bass drum and cymbals were sometimes performed by one

player, requiring a special mounting of the lower cymbal to the top of the bass drum’s shell.

This new performance practice, though necessary in smaller cities where there were not

always enough capable percussionists to play both parts, has complicated modern day efforts

to authentically perform the music of composers such as Rossini. Several such works

preceding the full acceptance of the Turkish percussion section into the orchestra will be

discussed later in this study. Cymbals were always crashed in pairs until the Romantic era

when the use of a single cymbal, struck with beaters, became an acceptable cymbal technique

in the orchestra.

An early mention of the triangle is found in a tenth-century manuscript.12 It is later

depicted in the King Wenceslaus IV Bible from the late fourteenth century. There are many

instances from the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries where the triangle was used either for

simple decorative purposes or among a group of musical instruments. The Crusades re-

introduced the instrument to Europe from the East where it was used for centuries to

supplement the tone of other percussion instruments and/or in combination with a small wind

instrument know as the pipe. The Hamburg Opera House owned a triangle in 1710 and seven

years later two triangles were purchased for the Dresden Opera House, resulting from its early

orchestral use.13

12
This source cites no other specific information regarding the triangle in this manuscript. The New Grove
Dictionary of Music and Musicians, ed. Stanley Sadie, 3rd ed., s.v. “Triangle,” by James Blades and James
Holland.
13
Owen Clark, “Percussion in the Opera Orchestra of the 17th and 18th Centuries,” Percussive Notes (1966): 11,
quoting Mitchell Peters, “The Sistrum and the Triangle,” The Percussionist vol. 2, No. 1 and 2.

15
 The ancient sistrum, a primitive type of Egyptian rattle, is considered a prototype of

the triangle.14 The handle of the sistrum was attached to a horseshoe-shaped frame made of

bronze or copper. Thin wires holding multiple metal discs linked the sides of the frame.

Figure 4 illustrates the sistrum.

Figure 4. The sistrum. Reprinted from Joseph Adato and George Judy, The Percussionist’s
Dictionary: Translations, Descriptions and Photographs of Percussion Instruments from
Around the World (Melville: Belwin Mills Publishing Corp., 1984), 56

In its medieval form the triangle maintained the jingling discs of the sistrum; three or

more discs hung from the lower, horizontal bar. Ironically, the triangle was not always

triangular when it first appeared in the fifteenth century. Paintings of that era as seen in

Figure 5 depict a trapezoidal form resembling a medieval stirrup.

14
James Blades, Percussion Instruments and Their History (London: Faber and Faber Limited, 1984), 162.

16
 15

Figure 5. Triangle similar to one used in the Turkish percussion section. Reprinted from
James Blades and Jeremy Montagu, Early Percussion Instruments From the Middle Ages to
the Baroque (London: Oxford University Press, 1976), 11

Also, the triangle could have an open or closed end. A triangle with no opening between two

of its sides produced a definite pitch, distinguishing its sound from the indefinite pitch of

today’s accepted open-ended model. Unlike the sistrum, whose sound was generated by

vigorously shaking its handle, sound from the triangle required striking one of its sides with a

thin rod made of steel, iron, brass, or wood. Though some pictorial accounts show the top

angle of the triangle’s steel bar twisted into a loop through which the thumb of the performer

passes, the triangle is most often suspended by wire or string connected to the underside of the

instrument’s top angle. Triangles are historically shown in various sizes, with some as large

17
as fourteen inches on a side. Prior to its inclusion in the orchestra, its primary function was

decorative, supplementing the natural tone of the other instruments with a rattling or jingling

sound much like the Turkish crescent.16

Known by many different names including le chapeau chinois and “Jingling Johnny,”

the Turkish crescent consisted of a wooden pole topped by one or more metal crescents with

horsetail plumes of different colors hanging from the sides. Tiers of bells and jingles were

suspended from lavish ornaments so that when the pole was held vertically and shaken or

twisted, a rich mixture of bright colors and metallic tones resulted.

The predecessor of the Turkish crescent was originally carried as a staff by the

shaman, the religious leader of the natives of northern Asia, who believed that good and evil

spirits pervade the world and can be summoned or heard through inspired priests acting as

mediums.17 It was believed that the tinkling of its jingling discs could chase away evil spirits.

In China, the staff was raised to signal the start of ceremonial music throughout the Chou

dynasty (1122-255 B.C.). As the instrument moved westward, the Turkish crescent symbol

was added to adorn the top of the staff as a distinguishing icon. Janissary bands maintained

multiple crescent players, including one governor of the ensemble who carried his crescent at

the head of the band to assist in keeping the marching rhythm. The leader also led in dance-

like behavior that added a lively visual element to the band. By the time of Turkey’s conquest

in Europe the Turkish crescent had become the insignia of the highest dignitaries. It was

gradually revised with additional bells and mingled with other instruments in the military

16
James Blades, Percussion Instruments and Their History, (London: Faber and Faber Limited, 1984), 191;
Gordon B. Peters, “Treatise On Percussion” (M.A. thesis, University of Rochester, 1962), 104-06; Curt Sachs,
The History of Musical Instruments, (New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1940), 437; The New Grove
Dictionary of Music and Musicians (2001), s.v. “Triangle.”
17
The American Heritage Dictionary, 2nd ed., s.v. “Shamanism.”

18
band as seen in Figure 6. The novel, picturesque crescent was essential in the widespread

appeal of Turkish music.18

Figure 6. The Turkish crescent. Reprinted from The New Grove Dictionary of Music and
Musicians (2001), s.v. “Turkish crescent”

18
Thomas N. Akins, “The Use of Percussion in the Wind Bands of Britain in the Eighteenth Century,”
Percussive Notes (1969): 90; Peters, Treatise on Percussion, 97-98; Sachs, The History of Musical Instruments,
437-38.

19
 Interestingly, the symbolism behind the instrument’s appearance seems as significant

as its musical contribution to the ensemble of Turkish percussion instruments. For instance,

the quantity of plumes indicated the military rank of each band’s ambitious leader. Also, one

of the numerous crescents in each Janissary band was reserved to carry inside its bells the

names of the soldiers within that unit.19

The tambourine is a small single-headed frame drum with round metal discs called

jingles hung loosely in openings around a shallow wooden shell. Tambourines historically

appear four different ways: (1) with small brass bells attached, (2) with metal discs called

jingles, (3) with a snare across the head with either pellet bells or jingles, and (4) as a circular

frame without its drum head. The Turkish model from the eighteenth-century had several sets

of jingles arranged in pairs, but no snare across the diameter of its frame. Medieval

iconography as seen in Figure 7 sometimes shows a thin snare running either above or below

the head.20

The tambourine dates back to antiquity. Highlights of its colorful history include

mention in the Old Testament and its use by medieval minstrels and Spanish gypsies. It is

still popular today in Italy as a folk and dance instrument. The Sumerians, Assyrians,

Egyptians, Hebrews, Romans, and the Arabs used some form of the tambourine.

19
Bayard, “Timpani Clinic: The Neo-Janizaries,” 35; Peters, Treatise on Percussion, 97.
20
Blades, Percussion Instruments and Their History, 196-97; James Blades and Jeremy Montagu, Early
Percussion Instruments from the Middle Ages to the Baroque (London: oxford University Press, 1976), 14-18;
Gangware, The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration, 9-10, 116-17, 21, 25, 35-36, 41-42,
56-59; Peinkofer and Tannigel, Handbook of Percussion Instruments, 97, 100-02; Schneider, “Percussion
Instruments of the Middle Ages,” Percussive Notes (1978): 109; The New Grove Dictionary of Music and
Musicians (2001), s.v. “Tambourine.”

20
Figure 7. The tambourine. Reprinted from James Blades and Jeremy Montagu, Early
Percussion Instruments From the Middle Ages to the Baroque (London: Oxford University
Press, 1976), 14

Also in existence were other drums played without sticks such as the timbrel and various

frame drums. The Romans sometimes added little bells or metal discs to the sides of these

small drums, resulting in occasional confusion between the tambourine and its non-jingling

relatives. With the apparently widespread use of the tambourine, it is probable that Europeans

first noticed this instrument from its use by the Arabs. The tambourine thrived throughout the

Middle Ages in all parts of Europe, but was noticeably absent during the Baroque and

Classical periods. Known also as the timbrel, it found its place in the eighteenth-century

military bands following years of existence as a folk instrument.21

21
Ibid.

21
 CHAPTER 3

ORIGINAL ENTRY OF TURKISH PERCUSSION INTO THE ORCHESTRA

Sound-producing apparatus devoid of definite pitch belongs to the initial

attempts of primitive men to assist vocal expression of emotional feeling, to
accompany religious orgies, or to encourage their warriors on the march. The
modern orchestra includes the best of these primitive species, transformed into
perfected types of genuine artistic value, and has also drawn into requisition
various instruments originating in countries that are far apart. Most commonly
used are the bass drum, the cymbals, and the triangle . . . Their mission is
primarily to suggest “local” coloring or to emphasize rhythm for dancing.1

Thanks to composers such as Gluck, Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven, one can glean

some idea of how the Turkish ensemble of percussion instruments must have sounded to

European ears in the eighteenth century if allowances are made for the substitution of modern

instruments. As noted in the above quotation, the intent of such composers in their musical

compositions alla turka was to imitate local color, that is, to vividly recreate for the listeners

the authentic sounds of Turkish percussion as heard in military bands. At first, the term

“Turkish music” meant any or all of the various instruments borrowed from the Janissary

bands. Ultimately the term became synonymous with the use of the bass drum, cymbals,

triangle, and sometimes the tambourine.

The appeal of these instruments is evidenced by the desire of musicians to have the

sound of the Turkish music at their disposal in other ensemble settings outside the orchestra.

In 1710, a percussion pedal recreating the low “boom” of a drum was added to the organ in

the Salisbury Cathedral. Soon afterward a cymbalstern resembling the sound of the Turkish

crescent was added to the organ in the church at Weingarten. This feature was then adapted

1
Louis Adalphe Coerne, The Evolution of Modern Orchestration (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1908),
14.

22
to the pianoforte as an optional attachment to the pedal struck with the left foot, allowing a

pianist to supplement solo or chamber works with the color of the Turkish music. Wolfgang

A. Mozart (Sonata in A Major, 1778), Leopold Mozart (A Turkish Piece, pre-1787), and

Muzio Clementi (Twelve Waltzes for the Pianoforte with accompaniment for tambourine and

triangle, 1796), are some of the composers who included this attachment that became known

as the Turkish pedal in works for the pianoforte during the late eighteenth century. Such

innovations not only increased European awareness and the popularity of Turkish music, but

also may have made a decided impression on orchestral composers during that period.2

The orchestral works of the eighteenth century were available for purchase in separate

parts or by basic sets. With an eye to affordability, the quantity of parts was kept low, and

separate parts for woodwinds, horns, trumpets, and drums were commonly available in

manuscript rather than in engraved copies. Often the title page of a musical work would note

the availability of parts for double bass, trumpet, and drums for supplemental purchase.

These parts were provided only by direct contact with the manuscript copyist. Even when

percussion parts were extant, they sometimes included only skeletal notations, leaving an

incomplete impression of how the work may have sounded when performed by the larger

orchestras of that era.3 This practice strengthens the opinion of certain researchers who

believe the designation of bass drum also implied the simultaneous playing of other

percussion instruments such as cymbals in situations where no single percussion instrument

was scored to play alone.

2
Francis W. Galpin, European Musical Instruments, (London: Williams and Norgate, Ltd., 1946), 68. quoted in
Gangware, The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration, 198.
3
Moore, “How Turkish Janizary Band Music Started Our Modern Percussion Section,” 11-12.

23
 The bass drum, cymbals, and triangle entered the eighteenth-century orchestra as a

homogeneous group, producing a characteristic tone color through the simultaneous

performance of the instruments. This new percussion section was used quite independently

from the kettledrums (or timpani) which by this time had already carved their niche in the

orchestra. Turkish percussion instruments were routinely grouped together in stage and pit

arrangements, just as they had been in Turkish and European military bands. Though the

arrangement of seating for each instrumental section varied from orchestra to orchestra, some

similarities were found within the placement of players in assorted theaters and/or concert-

rooms. The size, depth, and shape of the pit or stage on which the orchestra performed

ultimately dictated much of the instrumental layout. Nevertheless, many seating charts for

orchestras of this period reveal that Turkish percussion and kettledrums were not yet

considered a cohesive unit within the orchestra, as they are routinely seen in the modern

orchestra. For example, a plan for the seating of the La Scala Orchestra in Milan (1825) as

seen in Figure 8 clearly shows that Turkish instruments and kettledrums were placed in the

back of the orchestra at opposing ends.

The seating arrangement of the San Carlo orchestra in Naples (1818) bears a likeness

to the one in Milan. In his book entitled The Orchestra from Beethoven to Berlioz, Adam

Carse notes the comment of a long time German resident of Naples, named only as Kandler,

who described the orchestra at San Carlo as “most distinguished” among the many opera

orchestras in Italy. Historical evidence supporting the far-reaching influence of the orchestra

at San Carlo validates his opinion. A sketch replicating the seating arrangement of the San

Carlo orchestra was highlighted as part of an article published several years later in a well-

circulated German musical periodical.

24
Figure 8. La Scala seating arrangement. Reprinted from Adam Carse, The Orchestra From
Beethoven to Berlioz: A History of the Orchestra in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century,
and of the Development of Orchestral Baton-Conducting (New York: Broude Brothers, 1949),
474

In the San Carlo plan, however, the Turkish music does not include the bass drum. That

instrument is clearly identified opposite the other Turkish percussion instruments, close to the

timpani, in an obvious attempt to position the instrument near the contrabasses. Even at this

early date, the percussion instruments within the Turkish group were being accorded some

individuality, and could function not only as a homogeneous group, but in combination with

other orchestral instruments. 4 Yet another seating arrangement used by one of the large

orchestras in Paris was published by the same German journal in 1810 (Figure 10).

4
Adam Carse, The Orchestra From Beethoven to Berlioz: A History of the Orchestra in the First Half of the
Nineteenth Century, and of the Development of Orchestral Baton-Conducting. (New York: Broude Brothers,
1949), 272, 472-75; Musical Times (Germany). “Orchestra for the Large Concerts and the Large Chorus in
Paris,” (August 1810): 46; “Orchestra of the New Great Theater San Carlo in Naples,” (July 1818): 27-28.

25
Figure 9. San Carlo seating arrangement. Reprinted from Musikalische Zeitung (Germany),
“Orchestra of the New Great Theater St. Carlo in Naples,” (July 1818), 27

Figure 10. Paris seating arrangement. Reprinted from Musikalische Zeitung (Germany),
“Orchestra for the Large Concerts and the Large Chorus in Paris,” (August 1810), 46

26
 Early works that precede the use of a full Turkish percussion section,5 yet set the stage

for compositions to be more fully discussed in this study include Strungk’s opera Esther (bass

drum, cymbals, 1680), Freschi’s opera Berenice (cymbals, 1680), André Modeste Grétry’s

operas La fausse magie (cymbals, triangle, 1775), Lucille (triangle, 1783) and La Caravane

du Caire (triangle, tambourine, 1783), Christopher Gluck’s opera Echo and Narcissus

(tambourine, 1779), Wolfgang A. Mozart’s “Turkish March” from Piano Sonata in A, K331

(bass drum, cymbals, 1778) and German Dances, K571 (cymbals, tambourine, sleigh bells,

1787), and Francois Boieldieu’s opera Le Calife de Bagdad (triangles, 1800). Each of these

compositions uses one or more Turkish percussion instruments. Most notable within these

compositions is Strungk’s experimental use of Turkish cymbals and Freschi’s use of the bass

drum and cymbals in their opera orchestras, both in 1680. Further distinctions include

Grétry’s first orchestral use of the triangle in operas such as La fausse magie and Lucile.

Christoph Willibald Gluck, in Echo and Narcissus (1779), and Grétry, in La Caravane du

Caire, included an improvised part for tambourine.

Composers maintained a consistent usage of Turkish percussion instruments during

the initial period of their use: a strongly marked downbeat, fast, repeated-note pulsations on

the triangle, and cymbals that reinforced the strong tonic accent, along with the bass drum.

When the Turkish crescent was used, it also reinforced the tonic accent. Composers generally

reserved the use of percussion (and trumpets) for the loudest movement in a composition,

meaning the first and last movements of a symphony, or the overture and finale of an opera.6

5
bass drum, cymbals, triangle, and sometimes the tambourine.
6
Carse, The Orchestra in the XVIIIth Century (Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons Ltd., 1940), 139.

27
 Eighteenth and early nineteenth century works representing the first orchestral

compositions to incorporate the bass drum, cymbals, and triangle include Gluck’s operas Le

Cade dupé (1761), La recontre imprévue, The Pilgrims of Mecca (both 1764), and Iphigénia

en Aulide (1774), Mozart’s Die Entführung as dem Serial (1782), Franz Joseph Haydn’s

“Military” Symphony No. 100 (1794), Ludwig Von Beethoven’s De Ruinen von Athens

(1812), Wellington’s Victory (1813), and the last movement of Symphony No. 9 (1823),

Gioacchino Rossini’s L’ Italiana in Algeri (1813), Il Barbiere di Siviglia Overture (1816), and

La Gazza Ladra (1817), and Franz Schubert’s Des Teufels Lustschloss, D. 84 (1814). Brief

excerpts from several of these works are illustrated in the following musical examples.7

Figure 11. Gluck’s use of cymbals in Iphigénia en Aulide. Reprinted from Hector Berlioz,
Treatise On Instrumentation, Revised by Richard Strauss. Translated by Theodore Front.
(New York: Edwin F. Kalmus, 1948), 226

7
Although several of the compositions listed include snare drum, the domestication of this instrument is not part
of the “Turkish movement,” and it is not part of this study.

28
 Gluck’s use of cymbals for special effects in Iphigénia en Aulide (Figure 11) excited

the often-critical Hector Berlioz. He wrote, “Never has there been a finer effect of cymbals

produced, than in the chorus of Scythians: ‘Les dieux,’ in Gluck’s Iphigénia en Aulide.”8

Here the cymbals play a steady quarter note rhythm that accents the eighth note pattern played

by the bass drum and string basses. Gluck later scored cymbals with snare drums to create a

barbaric tone symbolic of the central character, Iphigénia, who must cut the throat of her

murderous brother. In a letter sent from Paris in 1822, Berlioz wrote to his sister, Nanci:

Short of actually fainting, I couldn’t have felt stronger emotions that I did
seeing Gluck’s masterpiece Iphigénia en Aulide. . . I defy the most insensitive
human being not to be profoundly moved . . . 9

In the above musical excerpt from Berlioz’s A Treatise Upon Modern Instrumentation

and Orchestration (1858), the bass drum part is written in notational shorthand that is still

seen today in some printed percussion parts. A slash is placed on the stem of a note, or series

of notes, denoting the composer’s intent to divide the duration of the original note into

repeated eighth notes whose composite value is equal in length to that of the printed note. A

second slash on a note’s stem would indicate repeated sixteenth notes were intended.10 In this

instance, a single slash printed on each half note denotes a steady eighth note rhythm to be

played on the bass drum. This example marked “Allegro” shows only downward stemmed

notes, suggesting that Gluck most likely desired the use of two wooden beaters in place of a

single beater and a ruthe. Berlioz is equally impressed by Gluck’s individualistic use of the

8
Hector Berlioz, A Treatise Upon Modern Instrumentation and Orchestration, 2d ed., trans. Mary Cowden
Clarke (London: J. Alfred Novello, 1858), 226.
9
Macdonald, Hugh, ed., Selected Letters of Berlioz. Translated by Roger Nichols. (New York: W. W. Norton
and Company, 1995), 5-6.
10
A tremolo, sometimes called a trill or roll, is denoted by three slashes on a note. Such notation was not
common in this era.

29
triangle as seen in Figure 12. Though scored predictably to play an eighth note pattern,

Gluck’s experimental use of the triangle in combination with strings, bassoon, and horns

rather than the expected bass drum and cymbals marks a significant departure from the

triangle’s previous role in Turkish music.

Figure 12. Gluck’s use of triangle in Iphigénia en Aulide. Reprinted from Hector Berlioz,
Treatise On Instrumentation, Revised by Richard Strauss. Translated by Theodore Front.
(New York: Edwin F. Kalmus, 1948), 229

Mozart, in Die Entführung as dem Serial, and Haydn, in the “Military” Symphony,

were both careful to reproduce the performance practices of the bass drummers of the period

who struck one head of the instrument with a beater and the other head with the ruthe.11

Downward stems denote the notes played by the beater; notes to be played by the ruthe are

shown with upward stems. In Figure 13, the parts for the bass drum and cymbals are

generally the same, scored to be played by both instruments simultaneously. When parts for

bass drum and cymbals differ, the cymbals play quarter notes to accentuate the eighth-note

11
The ruthe could be used to strike the shell of the drum rather than the head.

30
“stick and switch” passages of the bass drum. The triangle maintains its characteristic time-

keeping function from start to finish, playing in one passage for more than 42 bars in common

meter. The execution of this part may have required mounting the triangle and striking it with

two identical beaters. Musically, Mozart’s Die Entführung as dem Serail (The Abduction of

the Seraglio) represents the orchestral influence of Turkish music at its height. Mozart’s use

of Turkish percussion in this work was essential in reflecting the political hostility between

Austria and other nations in the late eighteenth century.12 It remains in the repertory of major

opera companies throughout the world.

Figure 13. Die Entführung as dem Serail by Mozart. Reprinted from score, (Leipzig:
Ernst Eulenburg, 1900z)

12
The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., (2001), s.v. “Janissary Music,” by Michael Pirker.

31
 Turkish instruments earned Haydn’s Symphony No. 100 the distinction “Military.”

As demonstrated in Figure 14 from movement II marked “Allegretto,” Haydn’s percussion

parts alla turka are simplistic, clear, and seemingly transplanted directly from the military

band. The bass drum part indicates the use of the ruthe (stems up) on the beats that fall

between strikes of the wooden beater on the initial beat of each measure (stems down).

Cymbals also emphasize accented beats, while the triangle chimes a steady, repeated pulse.

In the edition shown below, each half note has one slash on its stem, meaning that the triangle

is to play steady eighth notes.13

Haydn also used the Turkish percussion instruments in the final movement of his

“Military” symphony as shown in Figure 15. So essential were the Turkish percussion

instruments to Haydn’s orchestration that he adapted their idiomatic usage to accommodate

the new, compound meter that replaces the duple time signature in movement II. The bass

drum and cymbals continue to accent the strong beats in each measure; strokes of the bass

drum are alternated between the beater (stems down) and the ruthe (stems up). The triangle

repeats a predictably steady pulse, now in 6/8. The triangle’s unchanging eighth-note rhythm

is fully notated in the measure beginning its use before appearing thereafter in abbreviated

notation.

13
The same excerpt in an earlier edition of Haydn’s work (New York: E. F. Kalmus, 1932) shows both timpani
and triangle playing repeated sixteenth notes. The cymbals, rather than accenting each strong beat, most often
play only the first beat of each measure along with the beater of the bass drum (stems down). This investigator
believes the excerpt shown from Dover Publications, Inc., is more historically accurate by comparison with other
musical examples studied. Reasons for this conclusion include the practical challenge of the player to repeatedly
play sixteenth notes on the triangle with clarity. Also, it is characteristic for the triangle to repeat a steady pulse
of eighth notes simultaneously with the bass drum’s quarter note rhythm in compositions alla turka.

32
Figure 14. “Military” Symphony No. 100 (movement II) by Haydn. Originally Published by
Ernst Eulenburg Ltd., London. Reprinted from score, (New York: Dover Publications, Inc.,
1985)

Gradually the use of Turkish percussion instruments by orchestral composers grew

from mere imitators of Turkish music into a more valued commodity. The “Turkish March”

of Beethoven’s Die Ruinen von Athens (The Ruin of Athens) is a good example of how the

basic Turkish instruments were used to add color and weight to the music. It calls for as

many “noisy” instruments as were available. These instructions are believed to have allowed

for the use of other percussion instruments including tambourine and castanets, but only bass

drum, cymbals, and triangle are acknowledged in the score. The cymbals and the bass drum

have identical yet independently notated parts that share the same line in the score. The

cymbal part was read high on the shared stave with stems written upward; the bass drum part

was notated low on the stave with downward stems.

33
Figure 15 “Military” Symphony No. 100 (movement IV) by Haydn. Originally Published by
Ernst Eulenburg Ltd., London. Reprinted from score, (New York: Dover Publications, Inc.,
1985)

The absence of upward stems on the bass drum line indicates Beethoven’s apparent desire to

strike the bass drum with only a beater. As seen in Figure 16, Beethoven uses both the

percussion and brass instruments rhythmically to accompany the Arabian melody played by

the woodwinds.

In the finale of Symphony No. 9, Beethoven once again employed the homogeneous

Turkish percussion section (see Figure 17). Appearing only in movement IV, the use of

percussion to conclude the work was a part of Beethoven’s earliest sketches.14 Written in

compound meter (6/8), the bass drum and bassoons softly accent the second strong beat of

each measure to begin the portion of the movement marked “Alla Marcia.” Clarinets and

trumpets enter the rhythmic texture before the first melodic phrase is begun in measure 343.

14
Blades, Percussion Instruments and Their History, 267.

34
Figure 16. Die Ruinen von Athens by Beethoven. Originally Published by Breitkopf & Härtel,
Leipzig. Reprinted from score, (Mineola: Dover Publications, Inc., 1999)

35
By the middle of the first melodic phrase, cymbals and triangle join the orchestration, mostly

doubling the bass drum and bassoons that now accent both strong beats in each measure. The

bass drum, cymbals, and triangle are each given their own line in the score until the end of the

symphony (marked “Prestissimo”), where the cymbals and bass drum are scored together.

There are no indications suggesting the ruthe was to be used in striking the bass drum. By the

time of Beethoven’s last symphony in 1824, Turkish percussion instruments had developed

into accepted members of the orchestra.15

Examples of the early use of Turkish percussion instruments in the orchestra illustrate

their effectiveness in creating dramatic effects. As previously mentioned in this chapter, use

of Turkish percussion instruments was sometimes intended by the composer even in the

absence of their specific mention in the score. In a dissertation entitled The History of

Percussion Instruments in Orchestration, Edgar Gangware includes the commentary of a

nineteenth-century French historian named Francois Gavaert who outlined several such

illustrations. According to Gavaert, Grétry included a written instruction for the use of

cymbals, triangles, and similar instruments in the “Bohemian March” of his opera, La fausse

magie (The Magic Flute, 1775), yet parts for these instruments are not written down. As

previously mentioned, Beethoven gave only general instructions for as many “noisy”

instruments as were available to accompany the authentically Arabian melody in De Ruinen

von Athens (The Ruin of Athens), composed in 1812.

15
New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, s.v. “Janissary Music,” “Bass Drum,” Cymbals.”

36
Figure 17. Symphony No. 9 (movement IV) by Beethoven. Reprinted from score, (New
York: Edwin F. Kalmus, 1900z)

37
 Rossini’s intended use of percussion in his opera orchestras remains a particular point

of controversy. He composed some thirty-six operas in just nineteen years before retiring at

age thirty-seven. The speed with which he produced his scores often resulted in his use of

spartitini, a type of compositional appendix where the remainder of parts beyond what would

fit on the staves of a page was gathered in a “mini score” at the end of a work. Though

Rossini did not include percussion in all his compositions, parts for those works involving

Turkish percussion were most often relegated to spartitini.16 Two particularly troublesome

works are his comic operas, L’ Italiana in Algeri (The Italian Girl in Algiers, 1813), and Il

Barbiere di Siviglia (The Barber of Seville, 1816).

Figure 18. Overture to L’Italiana in Algeri by Rossini. Reprinted from score, (Pesaro:
Fondazione Rossini, 1989)

16
Nicholas Ormrod, “Authentic Performance Practice in Rossini Opera,” Percussive Notes (February 1996): 48.

38
 As seen in Figure 18 from Rossini’s overture to L’ Italiana in Algeri, the published

score reserves a solitary stave for percussion which bears the description Gran Cassa e Banda

Turka (Gr.C. and B.T.). Such a vague designation for “Turkish Band” leaves doubt as to the

specific instruments intended by Rossini. As seen in the above example, each of the involved

percussion instruments read from the same repeated quarter note, notated with an upward

stem. Most sources agree that Banda Turka safely infers the joining of cymbals and triangle

to the beat of the bass drum. The supplemental use of the Turkish crescent, tambourine, tenor

drum, and/or small bells (campanella), however, is a matter of considerable debate. Though

no mention of these other instruments exists in the score, Luigi Picchianti wrote in 1830 that

the Turkish cymbals and Turkish crescent were always to be played in conjunction with the

bass drum’s rhythm “in such a way as to create a harmonious and excellent blend.”17

Rossini indicates in the spartitini that a single performer is to play in the quiet

sections, suggesting that the louder instruments such as cymbals and Turkish triangle would

leave the bass drum to play alone at these points. Speaking of Rossini’s orchestration in

L’ Italiana in Algeri, Berlioz was critical of “that infernal bass drum” pounding senselessly on

the accented beat of each bar.18 Documents from archives dating back to early performances

of Rossini’s works in Venice and Milan suggest that the availability of reliable and competent

percussionists may have played a decided role in determining the quantity of percussion

instruments included in each performance. Instruments from the Banda Turka may have also

been intended for use in the stretta of the Act I finale, but the majority of sources researched

in this study agree Rossini abandoned any original plans to use percussion beyond the

17
Michael Rosen, “Rossini Revisited.” Percussive Notes (April 1999): 60.
18
Ormrod, “Authentic Performance Practice in Rossini Opera,” 50.

39
overture of this opera. (Rossini’s intentions regarding the timpani in L’ Italiana in Algeri are

also ambiguous. Though the original manuscript includes a part for timpani in the finale of

Act I, it is absent in many editions. Timpani receives no mention in the overture.)

Figure 19. Overture to Il barbiere di Siviglia by Rossini. Reprinted from score, (Pesaro:
Fondazione Rossini, 1989)

Figure 19 depicts an excerpt from the overture of Rossini’s masterpiece, Il Barbiere di

Siviglia. Only timpani and bass drum are shown in the printed score. Written in common

meter, the bass drum is to be played by the beater and ruthe in a style faithful to its military

heritage. Its quarter note rhythm is divided between the beater and ruthe in two ways. First,

the beater plays the downbeat followed by the striking of the ruthe on the remaining beats in

each measure. The steady quarter note rhythm is then divided by alternating strokes between

40
the beater and the ruthe as the timpani plays a steady eighth note pattern that is rhythmically

reminiscent of the pattern often assigned to the triangle.

Questions regarding Rossini’s intended use of percussion in this work begin with his

scoring for bass drum in the overture, and continue into the two-act opera. It is not clear

whether the part scored for bass drum in the overture was to be doubled by cymbals. If this

was Rossini’s intent, the cymbals would most likely reinforce each strong beat played by the

bass drum beater (stems down). One player could have performed the playing of the bass

drum and cymbals by attaching the lower cymbal to the top of the bass drum’s shell. The

opera itself is scored for bass drum (potentially joined by cymbals), and sistro, the

predecessor to our modern orchestra bells. Though it is possible that Rossini desired bells,

there is no key signature given on the percussion stave as would be expected for an instrument

capable of producing definite pitches. It is likely that in characteristic haste, Rossini

misspelled his actual intent to score for the sistrum (sistri). In this case, the Turkish triangle

with its jingling discs suspended from the lower horizontal bar would not only offer a sound

in keeping with the sistrum, but also give added opportunity for dynamic contrast.19 Renato

Meucci, Professor of History of Musical Instruments at the University of Parma and a

specialist in the music of Rossini, states:

As regards the “sistro,” it is no doubt the name of triangle, and the use of
the plural, sistri, in “Barbiere” may have had a more general sense, such as for
example, triangle and jingling johnnie. The tradition of a glockenspiel being
used for a sistro dates back only to the end of the 19th century!20

19
Ibid., 51-52.
20
Rosen, “Rossini Revisited.” 60.

41
 The “Gipsy March” of Carl Maria Von Weber’s Preciosa (1820) includes a rhythmic

figure on a single stave played by triangle and tambourine.21 The historian Gaveart maintains,

however, that a tabor and cymbals were to be used as well. Since it is not practical for

cymbals to play the fast, tremolo-type rhythm seen in Figure 20, it is plausible the cymbal part

was to be improvised “ad libitum.”

21
Although the word “tamburino” seen in parenthesis in the included excerpt may sometimes indicate the use of
a drum, the instrumentation list preceding the score in the edition studied is clear that the triangle and the
tambourine is intended. Use of the tambourine in this work is also confirmed in the text of several sources
examined including Percussion Instruments and Their History by James Blades (London: Faber and Faber
Limited, 1984), 291.

42
Figure 20. Overture to Preciosa by Weber. Originally Published by Breitkopf & Härtel,
Leipzig. Reprinted from score, (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1986)

43
 CHAPTER 4

SUBSEQUENT HISTORY AND USE OF TURKISH PERCUSSION

INSTRUMENTS IN THE ORCHESTRA

The positive result of the Turkish influence on the orchestras of the

nineteenth century was that percussion instruments as an entire section were
then accorded a place in instrumental music ensembles. Not only the timpani,
but now a variety of percussion instruments of numerous timbres were
available for composers to use in various ways.1

The nineteenth century and the first quarter of the twentieth century represent a

segment of time necessary for the maturation of the Turkish percussion instruments accepted

into the orchestra. It was during this period that each of the standard instruments of the

percussion section was gradually weaned from its past standard usage and introduced to a

variable degree of independence. With the exception of the Turkish crescent, every member

of the Turkish percussion section included in the orchestra was to undergo changes during this

period of time that led composers to see the bass drum, cymbals, triangle, and tambourine

more autonomously. These instruments were given solos of different types, and were

accorded some individuality, functioning not only as a homogeneous group, but also in

combination with other orchestral instruments.2

The bass drum, seen in Figure 21, gradually began to assume a more modern

appearance by the beginning of the nineteenth century. Berlioz refers to two forms of the bass

drum: a deep, two-headed instrument known as the long drum in which the depth of the shell

was greater than the diameter of the heads, and a shallow Turkish drum of larger diameter,

also with two playable heads.

1
Gangware, The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration, 206.
2
Ibid., 256-57.

44
Figure 21. Modern orchestral bass drum. Reprinted from Karl Peinkofer and Fritz Tannigel,
Handbook of Percussion Instruments, Translated by Kurt and Else Stone. (New York: Schott
Press of Belwin-Mills Publishing Corp., 1976) 95

Even after its inclusion into the orchestra, the latter form was known as the Turkish bass drum

until the beginning of the nineteenth century. The orchestral model ranged in diameter from

approximately 30 inches to 40 inches; the depth of the shell around 20 inches. Later in the

century a tensioning screw mechanism was added, enabling finer tuning of the drum and a

more sonorous, full sound with good carrying power. The bass drum is almost always

double-headed.

The “stick and switch” style incorporating the playing of both a beater and a ruthe was

ultimately replaced by the use of two identical beaters. The most common beaters remained

wooden, covered with felt. Also called mallets, these beaters produced a deep, rich tone from

the drum. When only one beater was needed, the open hand could control the length of a

note’s resonance by muffling the head with the hand or forearm. Positioning of the drum

45
changed from its origin playing position upon its entry into the orchestra with the introduction

of the cradle, a circular metal axis connected to the outer shell of the drum by tensioned ropes.

The cradle was mounted on a secure, stationary base that allowed the rotation of the bass

drum to any angle desired by the player. Unlike the beater and ruthe that played on separate

heads, both beaters could play on the same head to produce one distinct tone. The drum was

struck in the center for a succession of short notes to minimize its natural reverberation; the

bass drum was struck several inches from the center of the head for general playing. These

refinements to the bass drum’s shape, size, stature, and sound distinguished it from its initial

use in the eighteenth-century orchestra as influenced by the military bands.

In his Treatise Upon Modern Instrumentation and Orchestration (1858), Berlioz was

openly critical, if not hostile, to what he considered an abusive use of the bass drum by many

composers prior to the mid-nineteenth century:

But to write it as it has been written for fifteen years past, in all full pieces, in
all finales, in the slightest chorus, in dance-tunes, even in cavatinas, is the
height of folly; and (to call things by their right names) of brute stupidity: and
the rather, because composers, in general, have not even the excuse of an
original rhythm, which they might be supposed to have wished to display and
render predominant over the accessory rhythm; nothing of the kind; they strike
senselessly the accented parts of each bar, they overwhelm the orchestra, they
overpower the voices; there is no longer either melody, harmony, design, or
expression; hardly does the prevailing key remain distinguishable! And then
they innocently think they have produced an energetic instrumentation, and
have written something very fine!3

Some years before writing this Berlioz included a noteworthy part for bass drum in his

Symphonie Fantastique (1830). According to the program notes often distributed to the

audience when this symphony was performed, Berlioz sought to musically portray various

3
Berlioz, Treatise Upon Modern Instrumentation and Orchestration, 226.

46
situations in the life of a young musician.4 In the last movement entitled “Dream of a

Witches’ Sabbath,” the bass drum was to be played erect like a military drum with sponge-

headed beaters. Authentic textual notes by Berlioz accompanying the score studied reveal his

intent for two players to simultaneously play on the same head of the drum to create a much

lower tone than was available from the lowest range of the timpani. Though the two sets of

timpani were muffled with a cloth on each drum, Berlioz preferred that sponge-headed sticks

be used in place of a cloth on the bass drum. Once updated into its nineteenth-century model,

sustaining the bass drum’s sound beyond the length of a single note became a practical

method of playing the instrument that composers, including Berlioz, added to their arsenal.

The tremolo, or roll, was produced like a roll on the timpani, with single beats alternated from

hand to hand. In Figure 22, the bass drum and timpani help to create a somber, sometimes

frightful mood, as the young musician envisions ghosts and monsters at his funeral.

In the Grande Messe des Morts (1837), Berlioz writes for the bass drum,

without cymbals, played with drumsticks that alternate on each side of the drum's heads (see

Figure 23). Berlioz indicates in the first page of the score that the bass drum is to sound a B

flat pitch as noted by the key signature seen on the stave where the part is written. Also

known as his Requiem, this gigantic work includes one hundred and forty players, four brass

choirs, four tam-tams, ten pairs of cymbals, a tuned tenor drum, bass drum, and sixteen

kettledrums.5 Berlioz experimented with a variety of bass drum beaters, giving constant

instructions in his scores for the use of soft, hard, or sponge-headed sticks for timpani,

cymbals, and the bass drum. He routinely provided his own beaters for the players to use.

4
Hector Berlioz, Symphonie Fantastique, Op. 14. (New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1971), 23-25.
5
Donald J. Grout, A History of Western Music, 4th ed. (New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1988), 676.

47
Figure 22. Symphonie Fantastique by Berlioz. Reprinted from score, (New York: W. W.
Norton and Company, 1971)

48
Figure 23. Grande Messe des Morts by Berlioz. Reprinted from Hector Berlioz, A Treatise
Upon Modern Instrumentation and Orchestration, 2d ed. Translated by Mary Cowden Clarke.
(London: J. Alfred Novello, 1858), 209

49
 Years after Berlioz composed for two players to play simultaneously on one drum in

his Requiem, Bela Bartók reverted back to a similar playing style widely seen during his

travels researching folk music of the Orient and Europe.6 In The Miraculous Mandarin

(1919), both sides of the bass drum were played with small sticks and mallets, reminiscent of

the “stick and switch” performance practice from the bass drum’s military use.

Like Berlioz and Bartok, Gustav Mahler in his compositions scored for a wide array of

percussion instruments such as tambourine, cowbells, chimes, glockenspiel, and celeste. It is

interesting to note, however, that only the bass drum, cymbals, triangle, and gong (in addition

to timpani) appear in each of his nine symphonies. In his Third Symphony (1895), Mahler

combines the bass drum and cymbal parts to be played by one performer, instructing that the

shell of the bass drum be struck with a ruthe. In both his Symphony No. 6 (1904) and

Symphony No. 7 (1905), Mahler scored for the bass drum to be struck with the beater and

ruthe.7

The subtle, yet effective use of the bass drum roll is also evidenced in L’Apprenti-

Sorcier by Paul Dukas (The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, 1897). As seen in Figure 24, Dukas

instructs the player to roll on one head of the drum with a double-headed beater. A rapid

oscillating movement of the wrist of one hand brings both heads of the stick into contact with

the drumhead to produce the single-handed roll.8

6
Peinkofer, Handbook of Percussion Instruments, 96.
7
Blades, Percussion Instruments and Their History, 328; Reginald Smith Brindle, Contemporary Percussion.
(London: Oxford University Press, 1975), 236-37.
8
The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 2nd ed., (2001), s.v. “Bass Drum.”

50
Figure 24. L’Apprenti-Sorcier by Dukas. Reprinted from Edgar Brand Gangware, Jr., “The
History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration,” Ph.D. diss., (Northwestern
University, 1962) 217

Igor Stravinsky’s use of the bass drum in the finale to Part One of Le sacre du

printemps (The Rite of Spring, 1913) is considered one of the instrument’s finest moments.9

In Figure 25, Stravinsky ends part one with a rhythmically exploding crescendo of triplets for

the bass drum (and brass) to play simultaneously against the sixteenth-note rhythm scored for

the timpani and strings.

Stravinsky also included a passage in Part Two requiring the bass drum to be played

near its edge with a wooden stick. In Figure 26, the bass drum and timpani are chosen from a

large percussion section (including cymbals, triangle, tambourine, tam-tam, and guiro) to

share an intricate rhythm that drives the work to its feverish conclusion.

9
Igor Stravinsky, Le sacre du printemps, (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1989).

51
Figure 25. Le sacre du printemps by Stravinsky (example 1). Originally Published by
Izdatel’stvo “Muzyka” (State Music Publishing House), Moscow. Reprinted from score,
(New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1989)

52
Figure 26. Le sacre du printemps by Stravinsky (example 2)

53
 Since the initial entry of Turkish percussion into the orchestra, composers have

consistently used cymbals to implement color, create climactic impact, and to achieve exotic

effects. There was little consideration for playing technique in the late eighteenth-century

orchestra, as the incorporation of cymbals in compositions was overwhelmingly defined by

the basic striking of one plate against the other with an oblique movement. It is surmised that

the player would hold each cymbal in the air to allow the sound to ring freely, and then damp

them against his chest to cease their sound. With the Romantic era, however, the interest of

composers in a wider range of cymbal sounds and effects emerged. As composers began to

experiment with the use of cymbals, they were eventually pardoned from their previous

pairing with the bass drum. The result was an expanded palette of sound capabilities and

playing techniques for the cymbal including the suspended cymbal roll. By holding or

“suspending” one of the two cymbals that were previously struck together, the player could

strike the sides of the cymbal plate repeatedly with the mallets to create a sound whose

duration and volume was easier to control. This performance technique is best known today

as a two-stick roll. Whereas crashing to accent strong beats had defined the cymbal’s use in

early orchestral works as influenced by the Turkish music, rolling allowed the tone from a

single cymbal to be maintained, increased, or decreased as desired by the composer. The

suspended cymbal’s sound was gradually damped or instantaneously choked by the fingers or

hands. Harder mallets produced a brighter tone and a more distinct sound with each stroke of

the mallet upon the plate; softer mallets yielded less sound upon each stroke of the beater,

blending into a sustained tone produced by the vibrating of the cymbal. According to James

Blades in Percussion Instruments and Their History, Berlioz is believed to be the first

composer to clearly indicate that a single cymbal be struck with drumsticks. Blades believes

54
it was through the abundant and innovative scoring by Berlioz and Richard Wagner that

cymbals achieved their position of importance in the nineteenth-century orchestra.

The effect created by rubbing the plates together with a rapid rotary movement is

known today as a two-plate roll. This roll, supposedly employed by Wagner, was uneven in

its sound as compared to the controlled tone achievable with the two-stick roll. It was also

possible to produce a hissing effect by the quick swishing of one plate across the other, known

as strisciato.10 An effect seldom demanded, the strisciato is scored by Leoncavallo in

I Pagliacci, and by Dallapiccola in The Prisoner.

In Romeo et Juliette (Romeo and Juliet, 1839), Berlioz introduced the gentle tinkle of

smaller pitched plates he called antique cymbals into the orchestra. Seen in Figure 27, these

cymbals were played in pairs by striking their edges together, Berlioz included two separate

pairs tuned a fifth apart to echo the melody scored for woodwinds, as seen in Figure 28.

Figure 27. Antique cymbals. Reprinted from Joseph Adato and George Judy, The
Percussionist’s Dictionary: Translations, Descriptions and Photographs of Percussion
Instruments from Around the World, (Melville: Belwin Mills Publishing Corp., 1984), 44

10
Brindle, Contemporary Percussion, 80-81; Peinkofer, Handbook of Percussion Instruments, 121.

55
Figure 28. Romeo et Juliette by Berlioz. Reprinted from score, (London: Edition Eulenburg
Ltd., 1900z)

Debussy captured the mystic atmosphere of a dream with the antique cymbals in L’après-midi

d’un faune (1894), where he combined them with the flute to play only ten notes. Stravinsky

combined two pitched cymbals with a bell (cloche) in Les Noces (The Wedding, 1912). In Le

sacre du printemps (1913), he scored antique cymbals with the triangle to play quarter notes

as the timpani strikes two separate pitches in an alternating eighth note rhythm.11

Striking the cymbal near its center (bell) produced a more bell-like sonority. In Figure

29 from La Mer (1905), Claude Debussy included a cymbal part significant to the overall

11
Peinkofer, Handbook of Percussion Instruments, 61,199.

56
color of his composition. He calls for a suspended cymbal in place of the customary pair of

cymbals. In addition to climactic crashes, Debussy created new sounds through measured

rolls, grace notes, even the scraping of a metal rod against the cymbal to generate a scratching

sound.12

Some cymbal manufacturers today label the instruments into three categories: French,

Viennese, and Germanic. Such distinctions, however, did not exist until the modern era. The

heavy cymbals used in Turkish music and adapted from the military band into the orchestra in

the eighteenth century are best described today as Viennese cymbals. Their plates are slightly

saucer-shaped with a central dome or cupola. The thickness of Viennese cymbals allows for

both high and low overtones to be heard when they are crashed together. By the Romantic

era, an even heavier model gained acceptance, establishing the Germanic sound as we know it

today. A French model of cymbals emerged with Berlioz, whose works demanded a

shimmering tone suitable for combination with any instrument or group of instruments in the

orchestra. Their bright splash of color blended especially well with strings or brass. French

cymbals are lightweight and produce an immediate sound upon impact. They have very few

sustaining characteristics. Today’s orchestral percussionist employs the use of cymbals from

each of these three schools.13

The evolution of the triangle from its origins in Turkish music was undeniably

dramatic. The loosely strung, metal rings attached to its lower, horizontal side were removed,

producing a clearer and more brilliant “tingling” sound in place of sustained “jingling.” A

12
Ibid., 210.
13
Leonard A. DiMuzio, “Cymbal Vibrations,” Percussive Notes (1975): 24.

57
slight opening at one angle became standard as the instrument matured following its

acceptance into the orchestra, defining the triangle as an instrument of indefinite pitch.

Figure 29. La Mer by Debussy. Reproduced from early French editions. Reprinted from
score, (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1983)

58
Smaller triangles were used to achieve a higher, brighter tone; larger triangles produced a

lower, heartier resonance. The greater the thickness of the metal, the higher and more

distinguishable are its overtones. The thickness and force of the steel beater that strikes the

triangle determines its volume.

When the triangle was first used as part of the orchestral percussion section, it served a

“time-keeping” function as it had done for years in military bands. Gluck’s experimental use

of the triangle as the single Turkish percussion instrument scored in combination with strings,

bassoon, and horns in Iphigénia en Aulide (1774) called only for the playing of a

characteristically steady eighth-note rhythm. Although the implementation of the triangle

remained limited, nineteenth-century composers such as Robert Schumann in his Symphony

No. 1 (1841) chose the triangle’s unique orchestral tone to introduce an unsteady, less-

traditional rhythm. This can be seen in Figure 30.

Figure 30. Symphony No. 1 by Schumann. Reprinted from Edgar Brand Gangware, Jr., “The
History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration,” Ph.D. diss., (Northwestern
University, 1962), 209a

59
While still accenting the strong beats of the texture shared by flute, violin, viola, and cello, its

use was no longer predictable. The first composer to utilize the triangle in a solo capacity was

Franz Listz, as seen in his Piano Concerto No. 1 (1855). Often subtitled “The Triangle

Concerto” because of the instrument’s soloistic usage, the triangle has a short four-note

rhythmic solo, unaccompanied, repeated several times as the statement to which the string

section replies. Listz’s innovation, shown in Figure 31, marks the turning point from the

triangle’s military history to a more aesthetic usage.14

Figure 31. Piano Concerto No. 1 by Listz. Reprinted from Edgar Brand Gangware, Jr., “The
History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration,” Ph.D. diss., (Northwestern
University, 1962), 209b

Triangle rolls are played inside the upper angle of the instrument by striking both sides

of the instrument back and forth rapidly, with a loose wrist. Wagner included the tremolo in

the overture to Die Meistersinger (1862-67), as did Edvard Grieg in Peer Gynt (1875), and

14
Gangware, The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration, 207-09; Gordon B. Peters, “The
Sistrum and the Triangle,” 55.

60
Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov in his Capriccio espagnol (1887) and Scheherazade (1888). An

excerpt from this last work cited is shown in Figure 32.

Figure 32. Scheherazade by Rimsky-Korsakov (triangle). Originally Published by M. P.

Belaieff, Leipzig. Reprinted from score, (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1984)

61
 In his Symphony No. 4 in E Minor, Op. 98 (1886), Johannes Brahms used the triangle

both rhythmically and sonorously (Figure 33). In the third movement marked “Allegro

giocoso,” the triangle rolls in unison with the high-voiced sections of the orchestra that are

answered in alternate measures by lower-voiced instruments. The half-note rhythm scored for

tutti orchestra then divides into quarter notes which are played by the woodwinds, brass, and

lower strings, fueled by a driving sequence of eighth and sixteenth notes shared by the upper

strings, timpani, and triangle. This passage could be played while suspending the instrument

in the player’s hand, although mounting the triangle and striking it with two matching beaters

may also assist in the execution of this excerpt.

Much like its initial use in Turkish music, the tambourine has remained an effective

occasional member of the orchestral percussion section. It has been used by nineteenth-

century and twentieth-century composers including Wagner (Das Liebesverbot 1834), Berlioz

(Roman Carnival 1844), Bizet (Carmen 1875), Peter Ilich Tchaikovsky (Capriccio italien

1880, and Nutcracker Ballet 1892), Rimsky-Korsakov (Scheherazade 1888), and Stravinsky

(The Firebird 1910, and Petrouchka 1911). Numerous methods of playing the tambourine

allow composers a wide range of possible uses beyond its Turkish role of supplying color.15

15
Blades, Percussion Instruments and Their History, 385-86; Gangware, The History and Use of Percussion
Instruments in Orchestration, 212-14; Peinkofer and Tannigel, Handbook of Percussion Instruments, 100-01.

62
Figure 33. Symphony No. 4 (movement III) by Brahms. Originally Published by Breitkopf &
Härtel, Leipzig. Reprinted from score, (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1974)

63
 The tambourine’s head may be struck with knuckles, fingertips, palm, closed first, or

the knee. In the dance entitled “Trepak” from Tchaikovsky’s Nutcracker Ballet (Figure 34)

the performer executes an intricate rhythm by striking the tambourine back and forth between

the knee and hand. The tambourine is held upside down so that its single head is closest to

the knee. The fingers strike underneath the head inside the instrument. In the movement

from Scheherazade entitled “The Young Prince and Princess,” Rimsky-Korsakov chooses for

the tambourine to play a strong, repeated pulse. This pulse is accompanied, but not copied by

the triangle, cymbals, and drum.

For softer passages, a player strikes the rim of the tambourine with the fingertips or

with mallets. The striking of the instrument with two mallets in an alternating pattern may

require the placement of the tambourine on a flat stand. Covering the stand with a soft cloth

or towel prevents undesirable sounds from the tambourine when it is struck. This playing

method may also be used for passages involving a rapid succession of notes.

As on the other percussion instruments, maintaining a desired length of sound is

achieved on the tambourine by rolling. The standard roll involves shaking the instrument

from its regularly held vertical position, allowing the sound from its jingles to sustain. The

tambourine roll is notated by three slashes on the stem of the rolled note. The length of the

roll is determined by the written value of the note. Unlike the suspended cymbal roll, the

shaking movement required to generate the jingling of the metal discs (located along the sides

of the tambourine’s shell) limits its dynamic range. The standard roll is ill suited for soft

passages.

64
Figure 34. Scheherazade by Rimsky-Korsakov (tambourine). Originally Published by M. P.
Belaieff, Leipzig. Reprinted from score, (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1984)

65
 A more virtuosic method of rolling involves a player rubbing his moistened thumb

around the rim of the tambourine’s head. This friction roll allows for a softer sounding roll,

but one more technically challenging to execute consistently. Extended durations of the

thumb roll are also difficult to sustain since the player must simultaneously press into the head

of the instrument while circling around the tambourine’s rim to generate sound from the metal

jingles. Figure 35 from Stravinsky’s The Firebird (1910) demonstrates the friction roll.

Figure 35. The Firebird by Stravinsky. Reprinted from Edgar Brand Gangware, Jr., “The
History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration,” Ph.D. diss., (Northwestern
University, 1962), 214

Stravinsky employs both the standard roll and the friction roll in Figure 36 from Petrouchka

(“Gypsies and a Rake Vendor”).

Figure 36. Petrouchka by Stravinsky. Reproduced by Boosey & Hawkes, Ltd. Reprinted
from James Blades, Percussion Instruments and Their History, (London: Faber and Faber
Limited, 1984), 386

66
 The Turkish crescent is only briefly mentioned by Berlioz in his Treatise On Modern

Instrumentation and Orchestration as an instrument adding brilliance to “lively pieces, and

pompous marches in military music.” It is included as pavillon chinois in his Symphonie

funébre et triomphale.16 There were no orchestral compositions found during this study,

however, to indicate the instrument survived beyond its role in the eighteenth-century

homogeneous Turkish percussion section.

16
Blades, Percussion Instruments and Their History, 266.

67
 CHAPTER 5

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The major findings of this study are summarized below. They are grouped into two

categories, historical and performance practice.

1. The percussion instruments first incorporated into the late eighteenth-century and

early nineteenth-century orchestra consisted of the bass drum, cymbals, and triangle. The

tambourine and Turkish crescent were also occasionally added.

2. At first, the term “Turkish music” meant the style of music played by the Janissary

band, a name originally associated with a select group of instrumental performers specifically

trained to assist an elite corps of fighters created by Turkish rulers in the fourteenth century.

This military music attracted the attention of Europe’s armies, and ultimately found its way

into the orchestral scores of Western composers. Eventually, the term became synonymous

with the use of the bass drum, cymbals, triangle, and sometimes the tambourine in the late

eighteenth century and early nineteenth century orchestra.

3. Upon their entrance into the late eighteenth-century and early nineteenth-century

orchestra, the bass drum, cymbals, and triangle formed a homogeneous group that produced a

characteristic tone color through the simultaneous performance of the instruments. This new

percussion section was used quite independently from the kettledrums (or timpani). Seating

charts for orchestras of this period reveal that the Turkish percussion and kettledrums were

not considered a cohesive unit within the orchestra at that time, as they are routinely seen in

the modern orchestra.

4. When the bass drum entered the orchestra, it did so with a specialized performance

practice. One hand struck a side of the drum’s head with a wooden beater; the other struck

68
the opposite head with a switch most often made of twigs, called a ruthe. Downward stems

denoted the notes played by the beater; notes played by the switch were shown with upward

stems. The ruthe often played on the unaccented beats that fell between strikes of the wooden

beater on strong beats. This method of playing remains essential in modern-day attempts to

recreate authentically accurate performances of many late eighteenth-century and early

nineteenth-century orchestral works.

5. The designation of bass drum in late eighteenth-century and early nineteenth-

century orchestral scores sometimes implied the simultaneous playing of other percussion

instruments, particularly the cymbals. Remembering that it was the homogeneous group of

Turkish percussion instruments as performed by the military bands that originally fascinated

Western composers, some researchers maintain that is was standard practice for the cymbals

to accompany the bass drum unless either the bass drum or cymbals was scored to play alone.

In smaller cities where there was not always enough capable percussionists, it was sometimes

necessary for the bass drum and cymbals to be performed by one player through the mounting

of one cymbal to the top of the bass drum’s shell. The player would strike the held cymbal

against the mounted cymbal simultaneous to the playing of the bass drum. Such performance

practices have complicated modern day efforts to authentically perform the music of

composers including Rossini.

6. Orchestral composers such as Haydn and Mozart were among the first to

incorporate Turkish percussion instruments, using them as a homogeneous group. Beethoven

began incorporating percussion in his compositions as a valued textural component. Berlioz

went further by writing parts for percussion and timpani integral to the harmonic and textural

structure of his works.

69
 7. Following their acceptance into the orchestra, Turkish percussion instruments

experienced changes in design that resulted in a less homogeneous, more independent use of

these instruments by composers. With the exception of the Turkish crescent, composers

began to see the bass drum, cymbals, triangle, and tambourine more autonomously.

8. Especially significant are the contributions of Hector Berlioz to the development

and use of percussion instruments by nineteenth-century, twentieth century, and modern-day

percussionists and composers alike. In A Treatise Upon Modern Instrumentation and

Orchestration, Berlioz devotes more space to the discussion of percussion instruments and

their use than any other section of the orchestra. His attack of early nineteenth-century

performance practices including the use of the bass drum only as an accent to mark the strong

beat of each bar, and the playing by a single performer of both the bass drum and cymbals,

helped to create a more aesthetic, less idiomatic perception of these instruments by orchestral

composers. It was Berlioz who suggested conservatory instruction for serious percussionists.

His literary contributions, innovative use of percussion instruments in his own compositions,

and visionary ideas were crucial to the advancement of percussion in the orchestra.

9. The incorporation of Turkish percussion instruments first implemented by

orchestral composers in the late eighteenth century and early nineteenth-century is the

foundation from which the modern orchestral percussion section evolved. In the years

following their acceptance, percussion instruments have in many instances become a focal

point of orchestration.

Based on this study, this writer suggests the following topics for future research:

1. Further examination regarding the performance practice of playing the bass drum

and crash cymbals by one performer is an interesting topic for future study.

70
 2. With rare exception, percussionists were considered incompetent and rarely

necessary in the orchestra until Berlioz and his contemporaries began writing parts for

percussion and timpani integral to the harmonic and textural structure of their compositions.

The impact of Hector Berlioz in reshaping the view of how percussion instruments could be

utilized in the orchestra also deserves serious examination.

71
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Musical Scores

Beethoven, Ludwig Van. Die Ruinen von Athens. Mineola: Dover Publications, Inc.,
1999.

________. Symphony No. 9, Op. 125. New York: Edwin F. Kalmus, 1900z.

________. Symphony No. 9, Op. 125. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1976.

________. Wellingtons Seig (“The Battle of Victoria”), Op. 91. New York: Dover
Publications, Inc., 1976.

Berlioz, Hector. Romeo et Juliette, Op. 17. London: Edition Eulenburg Ltd., 1900z.

________. Symphonie Fantastique, Op. 14. New York: W. W. Norton and Company,
1971.

Brahms, Johannes, Symphony No. 4 in E Minor, Op. 98. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.,
1974.

Debussy, Claude. La Mer. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1983.

Dukas, Paul. L’Apprenti-Sorcier. As reproduced in Edgar Gangware Jr., “The History

and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration.” Ph.D. diss., Northwestern
University, 1962.

Haydn, Franz Joseph. “Military” Symphony No. 100, G Major. New York: E. F. Kalmus,
1932.

Haydn, Franz Joseph. “Military” Symphony No. 100, G Major. New York: Dover
Publication, Inc., 1985.

Liszt, Franz. Piano Concerto No. 1 in E flat Major. As reproduced in Edgar Gangware
Jr., “The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration.” Ph.D.
diss., Northwestern University, 1962.

Mozart, Wolfgang Amadeus. Die Entführung aus dem Serail K. 384: Overture. Leipzig:
Ernst Eulenburg, 1900z.

________. Turkish March from Piano Sonata in A Major K. 331. Bryn Mawr: Theodore
Presser Company, 1956.

Rimsky, Korsakov, Nikolay. Scheherazade. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1984.

72
Rossini, Gioacchino. Il barbiere di Siviglia: Overture. Pesaro: Fondazione Rossini, 1989.

________. La Gazza Ladra: Overture. Pesaro: Fondazione Rossini, 1989.

________. L’ Italiana in Algeri: Overture. Pesaro: Fondazione Rossini, 1989.

________. Robert Bruce: Overture. Pesaro: Fondazione Rossini, 1989.

Schumann, Robert. “Spring” Symphony No. 1, Op. 38. As reproduced in Edgar

Gangware, Jr., “The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in
Orchestration.” Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University, 1962.

Stravinsky, Igor. Petrouchka. As reproduced in James Blades, Percussion Instruments

and Their History. London: Faber and Faber Limited, 1984.

________. Le sacre du printemps. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1989.

________. The Firebird. As reproduced in Edgar Gangware, Jr., “The History and
Use of Percussion Instruments in Orchestration.” Ph.D. diss., Northwestern
University, 1962.

________. The Firebird. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1989.

Weber, Carl Maria Von. Preciosa: Overture. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1986.

Books and Dissertations

Adato, Joseph, and George Judy. The Percussionist’s Dictionary: Translations,

Descriptions and Photographs of Percussion Instruments from Around the World.
Melville: Belwin Mills Publishing Corp., 1984.

Adkins, H. E. Treatise on the Military Band. London: Boosey and Hawkes, 1931.

Arbeau, Thoinot. Orchesography. Translated by Mary Stewart Evans. New York:

Dover Publications, Inc., 1967.

Beck, John H., ed. Encyclopedia of Percussion. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.,
1995.

Benvenga, Nancy. “Timpani and the Timpanist’s Art: Musical and Technical
Developments in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” Goteborg,
Sweden:Gothenburg University, 1979.

Berlioz, Hector. A Life of Love and Music: The Memoirs of Hector Berlioz 1803-1865.
Translated and Edited by David Cairns. London: The Folio Society, 1969.

73
________. A Treatise Upon Modern Instrumentation and Orchestration, 2d ed.
Translated by Mary Cowden Clarke. London: J. Alfred Novello, 1858.

________. Treatise On Instrumentation. Revised by Richard Strauss. Translated by

Theodore Front. New York: Edwin F. Kalmus, 1948.

Blades, James, and Jeremy Montagu. Early Percussion Instruments From the Middle
Ages to the Baroque. London: Oxford University Press, 1976.

Blades, James. Percussion Instruments and Their History. London: Faber and
Faber Limited, 1984.

Brindle, Reginald Smith. Contemporary Percussion. London: Oxford University Press,

1975.

Burney, Charles. An Account of the Musical Performance in Westminster Abbey.

Payne, London, 1785.

Caba, G. Craig. United States Military Drums 1745-1865: A Pictorial Survey. Harrisburg:
Civil War Antiquities LTD., 1977.

Camus, Raoul F. Military Music of the American Revolution. Chapel Hill: University of
North Carolina Press, 1976

Carse, Adam. Eighteenth Century Symphonies: A Short History. London: Augener,

1951.

________. Musical Wind Instruments: A History of the Wind Instruments Used in

European Orchestras and Wind-Bands from the Later Middle Ages up to the Present
Time. London: Macmillan and Company, Limited, 1939.

________. The History of Orchestration. New York: Dover Publications, 1964.

________. The Orchestra in the XVIIIth Century. Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons Ltd.,
1940.

________. The Orchestra From Beethoven to Berlioz: A History of the Orchestra in the
First Half of the Nineteenth Century, and of the Development of Orchestral Baton-
Conducting. New York: Broude Brothers, 1949.

Coerne, Louis Adolphe. The Evolution of the Modern Orchestra. New York: The
Macmillan Company, 1908.

Daniels, David. Orchestral Music: A Handbook, 2nd ed. Landham: The Scarecrow
Press, Inc, 1982.

74
Duckles, Vincent H., and Michael A. Keller. Music Reference and Research Materials,
4th ed., rev. New York: Schirmer Books, 1994.

Farmer, Henry George. Handel’s Kettledrums and Other Papers on Military Music.
London, Robert Stockwell LTD., 1965.

________. Turkish Musical Instruments in the Seventeenth Century. Glasgow, 1937.

Gangware, Edgar Brand, Jr. “The History and Use of Percussion Instruments in
Orchestration.” Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University, 1962.

Girsberger, Russ. A Practical Guide to Percussion Terminology. Edited by Anthony J.

Cirone. Ft. Lauderdale: Meredith Music Publications, 1998.

Gauthreaux, Guy Gregoire II. “Orchestral Snare Drum Performance: An Historical

Study.” D.M.A. monograph, Louisiana State University, 1989.

Grout, Donald J. A History of Western Music, 4th ed. New York: W. W. Norton and
Company, 1988.

Hamm, Charles. Music in the New World. New York: W. W. Norton and Company,
Inc., 1983.

Kappey, J. A. Military Music. London: Boosey and Company, 1984.

Korzun, Jonathan Nicholas. “The Orchestral Transcriptions for Band of J. P. Sousa:

A Description and Analysis.” D.M.A. diss., University of Illinois/ Urbana-
Champagne, 1994.

Koury, Daniel James. “The Orchestra in the Nineteenth Century: Physical Aspects of
Its Performance Practice.” D.M.A. diss., Boston University Graduate School, 1981.

Macdonald, Hugh, ed. Selected Letters of Berlioz. Translated by Roger Nichols. New
York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1995.

Montagu, Jeremy. Making Early Percussion Instruments. Early Music Series. London:
Oxford University Press, 1976.

Peinkofer, Karl, and Fritz Tannigel. Handbook of Percussion Instruments. Translated by

Kurt and Else Stone. New York: Schott Press of Belwin-Mills Publishing Corp., 1976.

Peters, Gordon B. “Treatise On Percussion,” M.A. thesis, University of Rochester, 1962.

Randel, Don, ed. The New Harvard Dictionary Of Music (Cambridge: The Belknap
Press of Harvard University Press, 1986), s.v. “Janissary Music.”

75
Ritchey, Ralph C. “A Study of the Factors Which have Influenced the Evolution
of the Orchestra Instrumentation.” Master’s Thesis, Northwestern
University. 1941.

Sachs, Curt. The History of Musical Instruments. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1940.

Scholes, Percy A., ed. An Eighteenth-Century Music Tour In Central Europe and the
Netherlands. vol. 2, Dr. Burney’s Musical Tours in Europe. London: Oxford
University Press, 1959.

Stedman, Preston. The Symphony. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1979.

“Tabourot”. Historic Percussion – A Survey. Austin: The Tactus Press, 1994.

________. Royall Drummes & Martiall Musick. Austin: The Tactus Press, 1993.

Tanner, Peter Hyde. “Timpani and Percussion Writing in the Works of Hector Berlioz.”
DMA. diss., The Catholic University of America, 1967.

Whitwell, David. A Concise History of the Wind Band. Northridge: Winds, 1985.

________. A New History of Wind Music. Evanston: Instrumentalist Co., 1980.

________. Band Music of the French Revolution (1789-1799). Tutzing: Hans Schneider,
1979.

________. Wind Band and Wind Ensemble Literature of the Nineteenth Century.
Northridge: Winds, 1982.

Articles

Akins, Thomas N. “The Use of Percussion In the Wind Bands of Britain in the Eighteenth
Century." Percussive Notes (March 1969): 90-94.

Bayard, Michael. “Timpani Clinic: The Neo-Janizaries.” Percussive Notes (1987): 35-37.

Bowles, Edmund A. “Nineteenth-Century Innovations in the Use and Construction of

the Timpani.” Percussive Notes (1982): 6-75.

Cirone, Anthony. “Interpreting the Symphonic Percussion Part.” Percussive Notes

(October 1995): 52.

Clark, Owen. “Percussion In the Opera Orchestra of The 17th and 18th Centuries.”
Percussive Notes (1966): 11-14.

76
Corkhill, David. “The Unique Function of Cymbals.” Percussive Notes (June 2001):
50-52.

DiMuzio, Leonard A. “Cymbal Vibrations.” Percussive Notes (1975): 24.

Grover, Neil, and Garwood Whaley. “Triangle Techniques.” Percussive Notes

(October 1997): 72-73.

Hamon, Beth. “Percussion Instruments in the 16th Century Ottoman Empire.”

Percussive Notes (April 2001): 59-64.

Hong, Sherman. “Percussion In the Orchestra: 1750-1850.” Percussive Notes (1971):

115-129.

Johnson, Warren. “Techniques of Orchestral Cymbal Playing.” Percussive Notes

(Summer 1975): 153-56.

Larrick, Geary H. “Percussion: Its Status from Antiquity to the Modern Era.” Percussive
Notes (December 1968): 42-49.

Levine, David. “Percussion Instruments and Performance Practices in Beethoven’s

Music.” Percussive Notes (Fall 1977): 1-6.

Matthey, Jean-Louis. “Crash Cymbals.” Translated by Michael Rosen. Percussive

Notes (June 1994): 56-59

Miller, Ben F. “A Brief History of the Cymbal from Antiquity to the Renaissance.”
Percussive Notes (Winter 1974): 46-51.

Moore, James L. “How Turkish Janizary Band Music Started Our Modern Percussion
Section.” Percussive Notes (September 1965): 7-13.

Musikalische Zeitung (Germany). “Orchestra for the Large Concerts and the Large
Chorus in Paris.” (August 1810): 46.

________, “Orchestra of the New Great Theater St. Carlo in Naples.” (July 1818): 27-28.

Navin, Thomas R. “World’s Leading Cymbal Maker: Avedis Zildjian Company.” Percussive
Notes (1965): 3-5.

Obelkevich, Mary Rowen. “Turkish Effect in the Land of the Sun King.” The Musical
Quarterly LXIII, (July 1977): 367.

Ormrod, Nicolas. “Authentic Performance Practice in Rossini Opera.” Percussive

Notes (February 1996): 48-53.

77
________. “The Ruthe in Authentic Performance.” Percussive Notes (June
1995): 65-67.

Peters, Gordon B. “The Sistrum and the Triangle.” Percussive Notes (April 1966): 54-55

Rosen, Michael. “Rossini Revisited.” Percussive Notes (April 1999): 60-61.

________, “Terms Used in Percussion: Die Rute.” Percussive Notes (1979): 49-50.

Schneider, Walter C. “Percussion Instruments of the Middle Ages.” Percussive

Notes (1978): 106-17.

Vincent, David W. “Even A Bass Drummer Should Be a Musician.” Percussive Notes

(Winter 1978): 88-91.

78
 APPENDIX

CHRONOLOGICAL LISTING OF MUSICAL COMPOSITIONS STUDIED

1680 Strungk opera, Ester bass drum, cymbals

Freschi opera, Berenice cymbals
1706 Marias opera, Alcione snare drum
1761 Gluck opera, Le Cade dupé bass drum, cymbals, triangle
1764 opera, La recontre imprévue bass drum, cymbals, triangle
Gluck opera, The Pilgrims of Mecca bass, drum, cymbals, triangle
1775 Grétry opera, La fausse magie triangle, [cymbals, not written]
1778 Mozart “Turkish March” from
Piano Sonata in AM, K331 bass drum, cymbals
1779 Gluck opera, Iphigénia en Aulide bass drum, cymbals, triangle,
snare drum
opera, Echo & Narcissus tambourine
Grétry opera, Lucile triangle
1782 Mozart Die Entführung aus dem Serial bass drum, cymbals,
triangle
1783 Grétry opera, La Caravane du Caire triangle, tambourine
1787 Mozart German Dances, K571 cymbals, tambourine,
tuned sleigh bells
1794 Haydn Military Symphony #100 bass drum, cymbals, triangle
1800 Boieldieu opera, Le Calife de Bagdad 2 triangles
1812 Beethoven Die Ruinen von Athen bass drum, cymbals, triangle,
tambourine
(castagnets + others not written)
1813 Wellington’s Victory bass drum, cymbals, triangle,
“The Battle of Victoria” side drums, ratchets
1813 Rossini L’ Italiana in Algeri “Banda Turka”
1816 Rossini Il barbiere di Siviglia: Overture bass drum, cymbals
1817 Rossini La Gazza Ladra timpani + 4
1820 Weber Preciosa triangle, cymbal, tambourine,
snare drum
[cym. part not written]
1823 Beethoven Symphony No. 9 (IV) bass drum, cymbals, triangle
1829 Rossini William Tell Overture timpani + 3
1830 Berlioz Symphonie Fantastique, Op. 14 bass drum, snare drum,
cymbals, bells
1834 Wagner Das Liebesverbot tambourine
1837 Berlioz Grande Messe des Morts (Requiem) bass drum, cymbals,
tam-tams
1838 Glinka Russlan & Ludmilla tambourine
1839 Berlioz Romeo & Juliet bass drum, cymbal, triangle,
tambourine

79
1841 Schumann “Spring” Symphony No. 1, Op. 38 triangle
1842 Wagner Rienzi tenor drum
1844 Berlioz Roman Carnival tambourine
1855 Listz Piano Concerto in E flat triangle
1857 Wagner The Rhinegold 18 anvils – 3 sizes
The Valkyrie tenor drum
1861 Tannhäuser tambourine, castagnets
1867 Die Meistersinger triangle
1875 Bizet Carmen castagnets
Grieg Peer Gynt triangle
1878 Dvorak Slavonic Dances, Op. 46 bass drum, cymbals, triangle
1880 Tchaikovsky Capriccio italien tambourine
1886 Brahms Symphony No. 4 in E Minor, Op. 98 triangle
1887 Rimsky-Kors. Capriccio espanol triangle, cymbals, tambourine,
snare drum, tam-tam
1888 Scheherazade triangle, cymbals, tambourine,
snare drum, tam-tam
1892 Tchaikovsky “Trepak” from Nutcracker Suite cymbals, tambourine
Casse Noisette from Nutcracker… tambourine
1894 Mahler Symphony No. 1 cymbals
Symphony No. 3 bass drum, cymbals, triangle,
tambourine, chimes, gong,
glockenspiel
Debussy L’après-midi d’un faune crotales
1897 Dukas L’Apprenti-Sorcier bass drum + 3
1899 Elgar ‘Enigma’ Variations, No. 11 triangle
1901 Rakhmaninov Piano Concerto, No. 2 bass drum, cymbals
1901-5 Mahler Symphony No. 6 [used Berlioz “ideal”]
1902 The Dream of Gerontius bass drum, cymbals, gong,
side drum
1903 The Apostles gong, fingers cymbals

1904 Mahler Symphony No. 6 bass drum, cymbals, triangle,

tambourine, celeste, chimes,
glockenspiel
1905 Mahler Symphony No. 7 bass drum, cymbals, triangle,
tambourine, chimes, gong,
glockenspiel
Debussy La Mer suspended cymbal, tam-tam,
glockenspiel, triangle,
bass drum,
1907 Wand of Youth, Suite II xylo, tambourine, chimes
1910 Mahler Symphony No. 10 bass drum, cymbals
Stravinsky The Firebird tambourine

80
1911 Stravinsky Petrouchka xylo., bells, cymbals, tambourine
bass drum = 1 player
1912 Les Noces crotales, xylophone +
percussion ensemble
1913 Le sacre du printemps bass drum, cymbals, triangle
tambourine, tam-tam, guiro
1918 Stravinsky L’histoire du soldat 1 player – 6 instruments
1919 Bartók The Miraculous Mandarin bass drum, glockenspiel
1937 Bartók Sonata for 2 Pianos & Percussion 2 triangles

81
 VITA

D. Doran Bugg serves as the Minister of Music and Administrator of the

Calvary Conservatory of Music at Calvary Baptist Church in Alexandria, Louisiana.

A member of the Rapides Symphony Orchestra, Mr. Bugg has also performed with the

Baton Rouge and Waco Symphonies. His career includes teaching both percussion

and band on the collegiate, secondary, middle, and elementary levels.

A native of Corinth, Mississippi, Mr. Bugg received the Bachelor of Music

Education degree from the University of Mississippi in 1984, the Master of Music

degree in percussion performance from Baylor University in 1990, and will complete

the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in applied percussion with a minor in orchestral

conducting at Louisiana State University in 2003.

82