1-s2.0-S1991790221000209
1-s2.0-S1991790221000209
1-s2.0-S1991790221000209
ScienceDirect
Original Article
a
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, National Defense Medical Center and Tri-Service
General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
b
Department of Dentistry, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei
City, Taiwan, ROC
KEYWORDS Abstract Background/purpose: Space-making is one of the essential factors for bone regen-
Bone tissue eration in severe bony defect. To test the hypothesis that an appropriately designed scaffold
engineering; may be beneficial for the bone formation in defect, the new bone formed in the critical-size
3-D printing scaffold; calvarial defect of rat was examined after implanted with a 3D-printed poly-3-caprolactone
Polycaprolactone; (PCL) scaffold, retaining with and without plasma rich fibrin (PRF).
Rat calvaria defect; Materials and methods: Thirty-two rats were divided into four groups (control, PCL, PRF, and
Platelet-rich fibrin PCL-plus-PRF). A custom-made 3D-printed PCL scaffold, 900 mm in pore size, retaining with and
without PRF, was implanted into a critical-sized calvarial defect, 6 mm in diameter. Animals
were sacrificed at week-4 or 8 after implantation for assessing the new bone formation by
dental radiography, micro-computed tomography (m-CT), and histology.
Results: By radiography and m-CT, significantly greater mineralization areas/volumes were
observed in defects with 3D-printed scaffold groups compared to that without the scaffold
in both two-time points. However, no advantage was found by adding PRF. Histology showed
that bone tissues grew into the central zone of the critical defect when 3D-printed PCL scaf-
fold was present. In contrast, for the groups without the scaffolds, new bones were formed
mostly along defect borders, and the central zones of the defects were collapsed and healed
with thin connective tissue.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that the use of a 900 mm pore size 3D-printed PCL scaffold may
have the potential in facilitating the new bone formation.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: fuearl@gmail.com (E. Fu).
1
Drs. Min-Chia Chen and Hsien-Chung Chiu contributed equally to this study.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.01.015
1991-7902/ª 2021 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under
the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 15,
2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Journal of Dental Sciences 16 (2021) 1214e1221
ª 2021 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier
B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
1215
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 15,
2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M.-C. Chen, H.-C. Chiu, P.-J. Kuo et al.
Figure 1 The computer-designed 3D-printed PCL scaffold customized for guided bone formation. (A. the scaffold, computer-
designed prototype; B and C. the scaffold, the cross-sectional and vertical views, by scanning electron microscopy; D. the
cartoon sculpture presenting a scaffold in the calvaria defect of the rat; E and F, the scaffolds implanted into the defects in rats)
(PCL: poly-caprolactone; PRF: plasma rich fibrin; and PCF þ PCL: PCL-plus-PRF).
were examined in a coronal view to determine the extent of were calculated. Among the four defect groups, the pa-
bone formation. The X-ray tube was operated at 70 kV with a rameters recorded in each of the defects and zones were
current of 6 mA for 0.12 s, at a distance 2 cm from source-to- compared.
sensor. Images were processed with the INFINITT Dental
PACS image system (INFINITT North America Inc., Phillips- Histology and histometry
burg, New Jersey, USA) and the Image J processing software
(National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). After being fixed in 10% formalin for 24 h, the parietal
The mean mineralized density threshold was set as a bones were then soaked in alcohol for sequential dehy-
radiopaque area. In each bony defect, two zones were dration before embedding in resin.35 Sixty four calvaria
defined: central (<4 mm in diameter) and peripheral zones specimens were cut into 80-mm-thick sections in cross-
(>4 mm in diameter). Radiopaque area (mm2) in each of sectional direction by a microtome (SP1600, Leica, Wet-
the defects (<6 mm in diameter) was measured and zlar, Germany). The slides were then stained with hema-
compared among the four defect groups. The areas from toxylin and eosin36 and the histology characteristics were
two zones of every defect were also measured and evaluated under light microscopy (DMI3000B, Leica, Wet-
compared. zlar, Germany). Under the microscope, the healed fibrous
tissues, bony tissues, and the residual PCL struts in the
Micro-computerized tomography defects were compared grossly and quantitatively (histo-
metry) among groups. The sections were cut from the
Using a high-resolution micro-tomography scanner (Sky- middle of defects in a longitudinal direction. The healed
scan1076, Aartselaar, Belgium), the specimens were tissue area was defined as the tissue space between the
scanned. The tube was operated at 50 kVp accelerated periosteum of the skin flap and the dura mater. The areas
potential, 200 mA beam current for 460 ms, 18 mm image of bone, connective tissue, and residual PCL were recor-
pixel size, and a 0.8-degree rotation step. Data was ded as the tissue areas in mm.2 Besides, the percentage of
collected and reconstructed with medical image process- each component in defect, including bone, connective
ing software (Medical image illustrator, Visualization and tissue, and residual PCL, in the total tissue area, were also
Interactive Media Laboratory, National Center for High- measured and recorded as a tissue area in %. The central
performance Computing, Taipei, Taiwan). After stan- zone was defined as the central 4 mm in diameter of the
dardization, the coronal, axial, and sagittal slices of each 6 mm diameter defect, whereas the peripheral zone was
defect were assessed. In the region of interest, the defined as the 2 mm ring space mesial to the defect margin
mineralized volume (MV) and its relative volume (MV/TV) (Fig. 1F).
1216
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 15,
2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Journal of Dental Sciences 16 (2021) 1214e1221
Figure 2 Radiographic evaluation of the mineralization for the 4 defect groups received with 3D-PCL scaffold and PRF. The top
images are presenting the mineralization of the four defect groups (the defect control, PRF, PCL, and the PCL þ PRF groups) by
dental radiography at the observation intervals of weeks 4 and 8. The lower plots are showing the quantitative comparison of the
radiopaque areas recorded among 4 defect groups from either the whole defects or from the divided central and peripheral zones
at the week 4 and 8, respectively (Data presented as mean and SD; and *significantly difference vs control at p < 0.05).
1217
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 15,
2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M.-C. Chen, H.-C. Chiu, P.-J. Kuo et al.
Figure 3 Tomographic evaluation of the mineralization for the four defect groups received with 3D-PCL scaffold and PRF. The top
images, including the axial and coronal views, are presenting the mineralization grossly for the four defect groups (control, PRF,
PCL, and the PCL þ PRF) by m-CT at the observation intervals of week 4 and 8. In contrast, the half of reconstructed images, placed
in the third row, showing the mineralization at the red line cut through two images in the middle row at week-4 and -8, respec-
tively. The bottom plots are presenting the mineralization ratios (MV/TV) in whole defects and the central and peripheral zones
divided among groups (Data presented as mean and SD; and *significantly difference vs control at p < 0.05). (For interpretation of
the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
defect were statistical indifferent among the four groups; scaffolds simplify the bone augmentation procedure by its
however, the higher bone areas in %, but the less connec- close fit design into the defect (Fig. 1). The 3D-customized
tive tissue areas in %, were observed within the central scaffold provides a more predictable way in surgery; this
zones of the PCL groups than those without PCL. In pe- advantage has been noticed in several case reports.7,37e40
ripheral zones, the fewer bone areas in %, but the higher In the present study, mineralized tissue could be easily
connective tissue areas in %, were noted in groups with PCL observed in between PCL struts with dental radiographs and
compared to groups without PCL (statistical difference was m-CT after 4 and 8 weeks of healing. Mineralization
obtained only at week 8). The residuals of PCL were appeared as the lattices and evenly distributed in defects
observed in defects of groups with PCL. In contrast, the of the scaffold groups. A particular mineralized pattern was
measured areas in the two groups with PCL, including the observed in the 900 mm pore size PCL spaces. Similar de-
absolute and relative areas, were statistically indifferent. signs have been done in previous studies with smaller (i.e.
200e750 mm) pore size PCL scaffold,16e23 but minimal new
bone formation or a maximum of 20% mineralization vol-
Discussion umes could be obtained in all of those studies without
adding other materials such as cells, mediators, bone
In this study, 900 mm pore size 3D-printed PCL scaffolds with grafts, or membrane. In contrast, around 40% of the surface
plasma-rich-fibrin were implanted into rat calvarial defects area of the defect may be mineralized in our study using a
without adding any bone graft or membrane. After 4 and 8 900 mm pore size scaffold instead. The relatively high new
weeks, new bone could be found in around 40% of the bone formation rate in our study was consistent with the
surface area in the central part of the defect when PCL results from a previous study showing around 30% BV/TV in
scaffold was present. In contrast, mineralization only porcine calvaria using a pore size of 1000 um.18 We further
existed along the defect borders in those groups without demonstrated that the new bone could be formed evenly in
scaffold (control and PRF groups) (Figs. 2 and 3). both central and peripheral zones of the defects with the
In general, because 3D-printed PCL scaffold does not help of PCL scaffold (Fig. 5). Further study is definitely
require additional cutting or shaping during surgery, the needed to explore the necessity of using such large pore
1218
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 15,
2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Journal of Dental Sciences 16 (2021) 1214e1221
Figure 4 Histological evaluation of tissue healed in 4 defects groups received with the 3D-PCL scaffold and PRF. The histological
sections were presenting the bone formation in the four calvaria defect groups, including the control, PRF, PCL, and PCL þ PRF
groups, respectively.
size; however, the pore size needs to be small enough to platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor,
prevent tissue from collapse, but at the same time large vascular endothelial growth factor, and epithelial growth
enough to provide space for bone growth. In the small pore factor (EGF). However, our result showed there is no sig-
size scaffold, the PCL struts were designed to support, but nificant benefit in healing rate or new bone formation ratio
they may further occupy the tissue spaces and let bone in 8 weeks. The details of the no significance are not
grow less. Therefore, an appropriate scaffold design with known; however, the concentrations of growth factors33
large enough pore size may be one of the key procedures in and the allogenic origins might not reach the effective-
using the scaffold for bone tissue engineering. ness. Finally, likewise the bone formation, connective tis-
In the present study, the histological finding of the newly sue growth into the defect space nearly to 60% of four
formed bone islands between the scaffold struts confirmed groups (Fig. 4), which means that a barrier to prevent soft
that the implanted scaffold could maintain the defect tissue invading during the early healing period may result in
volume well and might also present good compatibility with a better outcome.
surrounding tissue (Fig. 4). However, the new bone tissues Using a 3D-printed 900 mm pore size PCL scaffold, we
was not closely touching the strut but rather had a small demonstrated that a large pore size PCL scaffold was able
distance with connective tissue in between. This finding to provide an architecture for new bone formation without
suggests that the improvement in cell affinity with the PCL bone graft or membrane barrier in rat critical-size calvarial
scaffold is needed. defects. However, the beneficial effect of supplementary
When considering the effect of active loading agents, PRF was not able to be observed. Further research on the
PRF is believed to contain numerous growth factors, such as design modification of PCL and the necessity of adding
1219
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 15,
2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
M.-C. Chen, H.-C. Chiu, P.-J. Kuo et al.
Figure 5 Histometric analysis of the tissue area. The left plot A showing the tissue area (mm2) in the whole defects, as well as
the central (C) and the peripheral (P) zones; The right plot B presenting the tissue areas in % for the bone and connective tissue, as
well as the residual PCL, in the defects at the week 4 and 8. (White bar: control group, gray bar: PRF group, black bar: PCL group,
and dark bar: PRF þ PCL group) (*p < 0.05, vs control).
mediators or barrier membrane is still needed to find a Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taiwan, ROC (TCRD-
better result of 3D-printed PCL on alveolar bone TPE-108-43).
augmentation.
References
Authorship
1. Buser D, Bragger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and
Conception and design of study: Min-Chia Chen, Hsien- enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin
Chung Chiu, Cheng-Yang Chiang. Oral Implants Res 1990;1:22e32.
2. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical
Acquisition of data: Min-Chia Chen, Po-Jan Kuo.
bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a
Analysis and/or interpretation of data: Hsien-Chung
systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:203e15.
Chiu, Po-Jan Kuo, Cheng-Yang Chiang, Earl Fu. 3. Lutz R, Neukam FW, Simion M, Schmitt CM. Long-term out-
Drafting the manuscript: Min-Chia Chen, Hsien-Chung comes of bone augmentation on soft and hard-tissue stability:
Chiu, Cheng-Yang Chiang, Martin M. Fu, Earl Fu. a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26(Suppl 11):
Revising the manuscript critically for important intel- 103e22.
lectual content: Min-Chia Chen, Martin M. Fu, Earl Fu. 4. Tevlin R, McArdle A, Atashroo D, et al. Biomaterials for
craniofacial bone engineering. J Dent Res 2014;93:1187e95.
5. Troeltzsch M, Troeltzsch M, Kauffmann P, et al. Clinical effi-
cacy of grafting materials in alveolar ridge augmentation: a
Declaration of competing interest systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016;44:1618e29.
6. Canullo L, Trisi P, Simion M. Vertical ridge augmentation
The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this around implants using e-PTFE titanium-reinforced membrane
article. and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (bio-oss): a case
report. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2006;26:355e61.
7. Ciocca L, Lesci IG, Mezini O, et al. Customized hybrid bio-
Acknowledgment mimetic hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue regeneration.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2017;105:723e34.
8. Khoury F, Hanser T. Mandibular bone block harvesting from the
The authors thank Yi-Fong Tsai for his help in the Fabrica-
retromolar region: a 10-year prospective clinical study. Int J
tion of customized 3D-scaffolds. The research reported Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:688e97.
here was supported in part by grants from the Ministry of 9. Hutmacher DW, Schantz T, Zein I, et al. Mechanical properties
Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC (MOST105-2314-B- and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds
016-020-MY2), the Ministry of National Defense Program, designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J Bio-
Taiwan, ROC (MAB-106-083) and Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, med Mater Res 2001;55:203e16.
1220
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 15,
2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Journal of Dental Sciences 16 (2021) 1214e1221
10. Izquierdo R, Garcia-Giralt N, Rodriguez MT, et al. Biodegrad- 26. Clipet F, Tricot S, Alno N, et al. In vitro effects of Choukroun’s
able PCL scaffolds with an interconnected spherical pore platelet-rich fibrin conditioned medium on 3 different cell
network for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;85: lines implicated in dental implantology. Implant Dent 2012;21:
25e35. 51e6.
11. Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH. Fused deposition 27. Li Q, Pan S, Dangaria SJ, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin promotes
modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering periodontal regeneration and enhances alveolar bone
applications. Biomaterials 2002;23:1169e85. augmentation. BioMed Res Int 2013;2013:638043.
12. Cao T, Ho KH, Teoh SH. Scaffold design and in vitro study of 28. Lee HM, Shen EC, Shen JT, et al. Tensile strength, growth
osteochondral coculture in a three-dimensional porous poly- factor content and proliferation activities for two platelet
caprolactone scaffold fabricated by fused deposition concentrates of platelet-rich fibrin and concentrated growth
modeling. Tissue Eng 2003;9(Suppl 1):S103e12. factor. J Dent Sci 2020;15:141e6.
13. Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and 29. Mazor Z, Horowitz RA, Del Corso M, et al. Sinus floor
cartilage. Biomaterials 2000;21:2529e43. augmentation with simultaneous implant placement using
14. Ciapetti G, Ambrosio L, Savarino L, et al. Osteoblast growth and Choukroun’s platelet-rich fibrin as the sole grafting material: a
function in porous poly epsilon-caprolactone matrices for bone radiologic and histologic study at 6 months. J Periodontol
repair: a preliminary study. Biomaterials 2003;24:3815e24. 2009;80:2056e64.
15. Schantz JT, Teoh SH, Lim TC, et al. Repair of calvarial defects 30. Simonpieri A, Choukroun J, Del Corso M, Sammartino G, Dohan
with customized tissue-engineered bone grafts I. Evaluation of Ehrenfest DM. Simultaneous sinus-lift and implantation using
osteogenesis in a three-dimensional culture system. Tissue Eng microthreaded implants and leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin
2003;9(Suppl 1):S113e26. as sole grafting material: a six-year experience. Implant Dent
16. Schantz JT, Hutmacher DW, Lam CX, et al. Repair of calvarial 2011;20:2e12.
defects with customised tissue-engineered bone grafts II. 31. You JS, Kim SG, Oh JS, Kim JS. Effects of platelet-derived
Evaluation of cellular efficiency and efficacy in vivo. Tissue Eng material (platelet-rich fibrin) on bone regeneration. Implant
2003;9(Suppl 1):S127e39. Dent 2019;28:244e55.
17. Pae HC, Kang JH, Cha JK, et al. 3D-printed polycaprolactone 32. Braghirolli DI, Steffens D, Quintiliano K, et al. The effect of
scaffold mixed with beta-tricalcium phosphate as a bone sterilization methods on electronspun poly(lactide-co-
regenerative material in rabbit calvarial defects. J Biomed glycolide) and subsequent adhesion efficiency of mesen-
Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2019;107:1254e63. chymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014;
18. Jensen J, Rolfing JH, Le DQ, et al. Surface-modified functionalized 102:700e8.
polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone repair: in vitro and in vivo 33. Nakatani Y, Agata H, Sumita Y, Koga T, Asahina I. Efficacy of
experiments. J Biomed Mater Res A 2014;102:2993e3003. freeze-dried platelet-rich plasma in bone engineering. Arch
19. Li J, Chen M, Wei X, Hao Y, Wang J. Evaluation of 3D-printed Oral Biol 2017;73:172e8.
polycaprolactone scaffolds coated with freeze-dried platelet- 34. Kretlow JD, Spicer PP, Jansen JA, et al. Uncultured marrow
rich plasma for bone regeneration. Materials 2017;10:831. mononuclear cells delivered within fibrin glue hydrogels to
20. Zhang ZZ, Zhang HZ, Zhang ZY. 3D printed poly(epsilon- porous scaffolds enhance bone regeneration within critical-
caprolactone) scaffolds function with simvastatin-loaded pol- sized rat cranial defects. Tissue Eng A 2010;16:3555e68.
y(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres to repair load-bearing 35. Goldschlager T, Abdelkader A, Kerr J, Boundy I, Jenkin G.
segmental bone defects. Exp Ther Med 2019;17:79e90. Undecalcified bone preparation for histology, histo-
21. Kwon DY, Kwon JS, Park SH, et al. A computer-designed scaf- morphometry and fluorochrome analysis. J Vis Exp 2010;8:
fold for bone regeneration within cranial defect using human 1707.
dental pulp stem cells. Sci Rep 2015;5:12721. 36. Cardiff RD, Miller CH, Munn RJ. Manual hematoxylin and eosin
22. Rezai-Rad M, Bova JF, Orooji M, et al. Evaluation of bone staining of mouse tissue sections. Cold Spring Harb Protoc
regeneration potential of dental follicle stem cells for treat- 2014;2014:655e8.
ment of craniofacial defects. Cytotherapy 2015;17:1572e81. 37. Holzapfel BM, Rudert M, Hutmacher DW. Scaffold-based bone
23. Bae EB, Park KH, Shim JH, et al. Efficacy of rhBMP-2 loaded tissue engineering. Orthopade 2017;46:701e10.
PCL/beta-TCP/bdECM scaffold fabricated by 3D printing 38. Liu A, Xue GH, Sun M, et al. 3D printing surgical implants at the
technology on bone regeneration. BioMed Res Int 2018;2018: clinic: a experimental study on anterior cruciate ligament
2876135. reconstruction. Sci Rep 2016;6:21704.
24. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): 39. Chen X, Possel JK, Wacongne C, et al. 3D printing and model-
a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part I: technolog- ling of customized implants and surgical guides for non-human
ical concepts and evolution. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol primates. J Neurosci Methods 2017;286:38e55.
Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:e37e44. 40. Thomas D, Singh D. 3D printing in surgery e the evolving
25. Kumar YR, Mohanty S, Verma M, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin: the paradigm-shift in surgical implants on demand. Int J Surg 2017;
benefits. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:57e61. 42:58e9.
1221
Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Egyptian Knowledge Bank from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on September 15,
2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2023. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.